pgsql-hackers since 2002-05-12 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

May 12, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review Joe Conway 03:28
Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway 03:36
Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? Rajesh Kumar Mallah. 05:46
Re: [HACKERS] internal voting Bartus Levente 10:15
Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? D'Arcy J.M. Cain 11:05
Re: FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Jason Tishler 14:34
Re: Nested transactions RFC Tom Lane 15:31
Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane 15:34
Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? Tom Lane 15:37
Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof Peter Eisentraut 15:46
TRUNCATE Rod Taylor 15:53
Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review Ian Barwick 15:54
Re: TRUNCATE Tom Lane 16:30
Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor 16:40
Re: Nested transactions RFC Stephan Szabo 17:23
Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Patrick Welche 17:45
Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton 19:48
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) Tom Lane 20:33
Operator Comments Dave Page 21:03
Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor 21:35
Easy upgrade Doug Hughes 22:03
Re: Operator Comments Rod Taylor 22:50
Re: Operator Comments Tom Lane 23:25

May 13, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Nested transactions RFC Hiroshi Inoue 00:53
Re: Operator Comments Rod Taylor 01:53
Re: TRUNCATE Christopher Kings-Lynne 02:17
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) Joe Conway 04:08
Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton 04:12
Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton 04:14
Re: TRUNCATE Neil Conway 04:24
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) Tom Lane 04:31
Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? Rajesh Kumar Mallah. 04:50
Re: TRUNCATE Christopher Kings-Lynne 05:14
Re: Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB 📎 Enke, Michael 09:57
Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? D'Arcy J.M. Cain 10:21
Re: Operator Comments Mike Mascari 11:42
Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? Rajesh Kumar Mallah. 12:04
Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor 12:18
strange explain Oleg Bartunov 13:42
Re: Native Win32, How about this? Jason Tishler 13:59
Re: strange explain Tom Lane 14:04
Re: Join of small table with large table Rod Taylor 14:11
Re: Join of small table with large table Rod Taylor 14:17
Re: Join of small table with large table Tom Lane 14:48
Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over mlw 14:56
Re: strange explain Rod Taylor 15:17
Re: strange explain Tom Lane 15:24
Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over C. Maj 15:49
Re: strange explain Oleg Bartunov 16:08
Re: Join of small table with large table Stephan Szabo 16:09
Re: strange explain Oleg Bartunov 16:30
Re: strange explain Tom Lane 17:10
Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton 18:43
pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane 18:58
Interval precision busted? Tom Lane 22:11
Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Lamar Owen 23:05
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Rod Taylor 23:42

May 14, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor 00:31
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Neil Conway 00:33
What's the meaning of system column in views Hiroshi Inoue 00:34
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane 00:37
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane 00:42
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Rod Taylor 01:08
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane 01:24
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii 01:29
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Rod Taylor 01:43
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane 02:03
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane 02:33
Re: What's the meaning of system column in views Tom Lane 02:39
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Marc G. Fournier 04:13
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Christopher Kings-Lynne 04:26
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Oliver Elphick 05:58
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane 06:08
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Oliver Elphick 06:29
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Jean-Michel POURE 06:35
Re: strange explain Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 06:37
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii 07:52
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Hannu Krosing 08:21
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Hannu Krosing 08:35
Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Lincoln Yeoh 10:42
Current anon cvs does not generate GNUmakefile Oliver Elphick 12:06
Re: Current anon cvs does not generate GNUmakefile Oliver Elphick 12:49
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii 13:18
Re: Interval precision busted? Thomas Lockhart 13:39
Re: strange explain Tom Lane 13:39
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Hannu Krosing 13:40
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane 13:52
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Jan Wieck 14:17
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane 14:30
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Myron Scott 14:54
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane 15:59
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Myron Scott 16:17
Global Variables (Was: Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) ) Marc G. Fournier 16:29
Final(?) proposal on GUC hook extensions Tom Lane 17:04
Re: Global Variables (Was: Re: Discontent with development mlw 17:55
can't cast varchar as integer? Scott Royston 18:56
7.2.2 ? Oleg Bartunov 19:27
Re: can't cast varchar as integer? Joel Burton 21:20
Re: can't cast varchar as integer? David Stanaway 21:47
Re: 7.2.2 ? Tom Lane 21:50
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) Joe Conway 22:27
Re: [SQL] can't cast varchar as integer? Scott Royston 23:02
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) Tom Lane 23:15
Re: can't cast varchar as integer? Tom Lane 23:29

May 15, 2002

Thread Author Time
Array iterators Rod Taylor 01:15
resetting stats on the fly Christopher Kings-Lynne 02:25
Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Marc G. Fournier 03:45
Re: 7.2.2 ? Marc G. Fournier 03:46
Re: 7.2.2 ? Tom Lane 04:11
Re: 7.2.2 ? Marc G. Fournier 04:16
Re: Array iterators Tom Lane 04:48
Re: Array iterators Nicolas Bazin 07:10
Re: Array iterators Rod Taylor 11:55
Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Daniel 12:43
Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Tom Lane 14:13
A fairly obvious optimization? Dann Corbit 18:23
Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Daniel 18:38

May 16, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) 📎 Joe Conway 05:16
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) 📎 Joe Conway 05:30
Re: A fairly obvious optimization? Hannu Krosing 06:21
Re: A fairly obvious optimization? Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 08:07
Money type D'Arcy J.M. Cain 10:11
Re: Money type Karel Zak 10:51
WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Joerg Hessdoerfer 11:47
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Marc G. Fournier 13:38
Re: Money type Tom Lane 14:07
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Hannu Krosing 14:57
Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Bear Giles 15:09
Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Peter Eisentraut 17:21
Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Peter Eisentraut 17:21
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton 18:00
Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Andrew Sullivan 19:54
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Mike Mascari 19:56
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Magnus Naeslund(f) 20:10
Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Michael Alan Dorman 20:30
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Joerg Hessdoerfer 20:35
libpgtcl - backend version information patch 📎 Nigel J. Andrews 22:49
interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Joe Conway 23:51

May 17, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Magnus Naeslund(f) 00:16
Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) Mike Embry 00:34
minor CVS regression Neil Conway 02:00
Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Tom Lane 02:10
Re: minor CVS regression Tom Lane 02:21
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Christopher Kings-Lynne 02:25
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Marc G. Fournier 03:17
SSL client cert patch submitted Bear Giles 06:00
Trouble with pg_encoding_to_char youenn.ballouard2 08:02
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Enke, Michael 09:55
Future plans Michael Meskes 11:58
Poster(s) needed Michael Meskes 12:00
Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane 13:31
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Peter Eisentraut 13:36
Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information patch Peter Eisentraut 13:37
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton 13:57
Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Alvaro Herrera 14:47
More schema queries Dave Page 15:32
Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Manfred Koizar 17:37
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Manfred Koizar 19:21
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Tom Lane 20:16
Re: More schema queries Tom Lane 20:25
Re: +AFs-HACKERS+AF0- More schema queries Dave Page 22:23
Re: More schema queries Tom Lane 22:23
Re: More schema queries Dave Page 22:38
Error on PQputline() Dann Corbit 23:00
Re: More schema queries Tom Lane 23:01
Re: Error on PQputline() Tom Lane 23:10
Re: Error on PQputline() Dann Corbit 23:18
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Tom Lane 23:22
Re: Error on PQputline() Tom Lane 23:37
Re: Error on PQputline() Dann Corbit 23:41
Re: Error on PQputline() Tom Lane 23:46
Re: Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat 7.3 Mike Castle 23:56

May 18, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat 7.3 Thomas Lockhart 01:23
Re: Trouble with pg_encoding_to_char Barry Lind 01:54
Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara 04:34
Re: Poster(s) needed Marc G. Fournier 05:56
Re: More schema queries Dave Page 09:06
Re: Poster(s) needed Lincoln Yeoh 10:51
Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Joerg Hessdoerfer 13:57
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Tom Lane 15:22
Sequence privileges Peter Eisentraut 15:45
Re: Poster(s) needed Tom Lane 15:46
Re: Sequence privileges Tom Lane 16:24
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton 16:34
UTF-8 safe ascii() function Jean-Michel POURE 16:53
SASL, compression? Bear Giles 17:39
Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information patch Nigel J. Andrews 18:11
pq_eof() broken with SSL Bear Giles 18:38
*new* libpgtcl - backend version information patch Nigel J. Andrews 18:52
Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) Tom Lane 19:02
Re: SASL, compression? Neil Conway 19:18
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Tom Lane 19:26
Re: SASL, compression? Tom Lane 19:45
Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information patch Tom Lane 20:11
Re: SASL, compression? Bear Giles 20:33
Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton 20:48
Set-returning function syntax Joel Burton 20:51
Re: SASL, compression? Bear Giles 21:11
Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information Nigel J. Andrews 21:41
Re: Set-returning function syntax 📎 Joe Conway 22:16

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31