pgsql-hackers since 2008-07-18 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

July 18, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving David Fetter 00:10
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris 00:40
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline 📎 Sushant Sinha 01:16
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 01:41
Re: pgsql: Allow TRUNCATE foo, foo to succeed, per report from Nikhils. Bruce Momjian 02:10
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Bruce Momjian 02:20
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Alvaro Herrera 03:35
Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 03:46
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 03:57
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Tom Lane 04:22
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane 04:28
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 04:35
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 04:45
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane 04:46
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan 04:51
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Tom Lane 05:00
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 05:11
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule 05:13
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane 05:19
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris 05:21
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Tom Lane 05:37
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule 06:01
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan 06:23
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs 07:52
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Marko Kreen 08:22
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 Michael Paesold 08:39
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Gregory Stark 10:07
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs 10:35
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 13:04
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Alvaro Herrera 13:42
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 David Fetter 13:45
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches David Fetter 14:18
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Heikki Linnakangas 14:44
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris 14:48
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Gregory Stark 14:52
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris 14:53
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane 14:55
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter 14:56
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Tom Lane 15:06
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter 15:13
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Gregory Stark 15:15
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 15:41
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 15:47
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 15:48
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Marko Kreen 16:01
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 16:08
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Tom Lane 16:23
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera 16:30
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler 16:53
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 17:12
Re: typedefs for indent Bruce Momjian 17:16
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Bruce Momjian 17:20
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall 17:23
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Erik 17:30
pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane 20:26
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Tom Lane 20:42
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall 20:58

July 19, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: temp table problem Tom Lane 01:11
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 01:39
Re: temp table problem Robert Haas 02:13
Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane 03:28
Re: phrase search Sushant Sinha 04:30
Re: phrase search Oleg Bartunov 07:41
gsoc, oprrest function for text search 📎 Jan Urbański 11:15
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Adriaan van Os 11:35
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Jan Urbański 12:40
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 15:52
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 15:54
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane 16:39
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Florian G. Pflug 17:00
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Peter Eisentraut 23:16
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Peter Eisentraut 23:42

July 20, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera 00:21
pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 03:07
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 04:47
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane 05:36
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Bruce Momjian 06:08
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance 📎 Simon Riggs 06:37
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Peter Eisentraut 07:50
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane 13:48
Re: temp table problem 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 15:27
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 15:42
Re: temp table problem Tom Lane 16:04
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tom Lane 16:22
CommitFest dragging? Josh Berkus 17:17
Re: CommitFest dragging? Joshua D. Drake 17:22
Re: pg_dump lock timeout Tom Lane 18:50
Re: CommitFest dragging? Tom Lane 19:05
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 21:43
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 21:59
Re: CommitFest dragging? Andrew Chernow 22:20
Re: CommitFest dragging? Josh Berkus 22:38
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii 23:19

July 21, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter 00:00
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii 01:13
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Radek Strnad 01:15
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 01:18
Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql? laser 01:39
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance daveg 01:49
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 01:58
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 03:34
Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence Tom Lane 05:38
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Pavan Deolasee 06:06
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 06:11
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 06:17
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 06:47
Re: pg_dump lock timeout daveg 07:21
Re: pg_dump lock timeout Tom Lane 07:43
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 08:40
Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas 08:53
overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 11:08
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the 📎 Markus Wanner 11:33
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 11:46
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 11:54
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 11:56
Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark 13:46
WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 14:04
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Markus Wanner 14:14
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Tatsuo Ishii 14:22
Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 14:29
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane 14:31
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Pavel Stehule 14:41
Re: overlaps performance Tom Lane 14:44
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris 14:45
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Markus Wanner 14:55
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Tom Lane 15:02
Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 15:09
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Andrew Dunstan 15:19
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas 15:23
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane 15:27
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 15:38
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain 16:07
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas 16:14
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain 16:50
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler 18:55
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 19:26
Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 19:43
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) 📎 Robert Lor 19:47
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus 19:53
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan 19:59
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 20:07
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Simon Riggs 20:08
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:14
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marc Munro 20:17
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:17
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 20:18
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan 20:19
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 20:21
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Sullivan 20:28
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Tom Lane 20:33
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:37
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:38
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 20:38
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Cramer 20:55
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Decibel! 20:58
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 21:00
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 21:11
Re: typedefs for indent Andrew Dunstan 21:27
Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 21:50
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan 22:13
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Alvaro Herrera 22:15
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 23:19
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane 23:38
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane 23:59

July 22, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 01:29
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 01:32
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 01:39
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane 02:19
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 02:51
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Owen Hartnett 03:53
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Matthew T. O'Connor 04:31
Re: pg_dump lock timeout 📎 daveg 05:57
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout 06:33
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 06:35
Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner 08:04
Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark 09:15
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut 09:48
pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 10:57
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 11:28
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 12:21
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 12:43
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Simon Riggs 12:44
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark 13:39
shared_buffers and shmmax dx k9 13:39
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Page 13:47
Re: shared_buffers and shmmax Valentin Bogdanov 14:08
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala 14:32
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane 14:34
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Andrew Sullivan 14:39
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 14:42
Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Tom Lane 14:45
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 14:50
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 14:53
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Christopher Browne 14:54
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane 14:55
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark 15:00
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 15:25
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 15:25
Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs 15:35
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 15:47

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31