pgsql-hackers since 2008-07-26 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

July 26, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Alvaro Herrera 00:15
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane 00:26
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump daveg 00:33
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Alvaro Herrera 00:37
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane 00:44
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera 02:36
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Greg Sabino Mullane 02:39
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 03:23
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich 03:41
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich 03:50
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane 04:03
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Ron Mayer 05:27
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane 05:38
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner 08:17
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 09:05
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs 09:08
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs 09:09
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs 09:35
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Gregory Stark 10:29
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan 11:47
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs 12:28
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan 13:08
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs 14:22
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan 14:50
pg_dump(all) library David Fetter 15:09
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 15:11
Re: pg_dump(all) library Stephen Frost 15:13
Executor question Andrew Gierth 15:19
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Kenneth Marshall 16:06
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 16:20
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 16:24
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 16:43
Re: pg_dump(all) library Tom Lane 16:46
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 16:56
Re: pg_dump(all) library Joshua D. Drake 16:59
Re: Executor question Tom Lane 17:20
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 17:43
Re: pg_dump(all) library Andrew Dunstan 17:44
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 17:56
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Joshua D. Drake 18:03
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 20:05
patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission 📎 Robert Haas 21:44
Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Greg Smith 21:47
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane 23:09
Re: Auto-explain patch Tom Lane 23:44

July 27, 2008

Thread Author Time
Search for version-numbered tclsh? Tom Lane 00:28
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance daveg 01:33
Re: Search for version-numbered tclsh? Andrew Dunstan 03:03
Re: Regd: TODO Item : Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE issue NOTICE messages ... Ramya Chandrasekar 03:45
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii 08:47
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 09:31
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 09:37
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Joshua D. Drake 16:57
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg 19:00
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Andrew Dunstan 23:42

July 28, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Joshua D. Drake 00:24
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 00:44
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 00:52
Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump additional options for performance daveg 01:32
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Joshua D. Drake 02:40
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 02:50
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Pavel Stehule 06:55
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas 07:28
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 07:29
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Zdenek Kotala 08:17
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg 08:35
Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ? Bjorn Munch 10:00
window function v03 against HEAD 📎 H.Harada 10:25
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala 10:27
about postgres-r setup. leiyonghua 10:41
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala 11:32
gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 📎 Jan Urbański 11:34
Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Magnus Hagander 11:49
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Dave Cramer 11:53
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? 📎 Marko Kreen 12:41
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Marko Kreen 13:03
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Andrew Dunstan 13:09
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Robert Haas 13:32
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas 13:46
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 14:06
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala 14:13
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane 14:16
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 14:56
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Asko Oja 15:11
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 15:20
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? 📎 Hiroshi Saito 15:31
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Marko Kreen 15:51
Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane 15:56
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Hiroshi Saito 15:57
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Greg Smith 15:59
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan 16:01
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Andrew Dunstan 16:06
dblink security Marko Kreen 16:16
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Joshua D. Drake 16:19
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Gregory Stark 16:33
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 16:44
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg 16:45
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marko Kreen 16:48
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Joshua D. Drake 17:00
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 17:06
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 17:27
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 17:39
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Dave Cramer 17:54
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? A.M. 18:24
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg 18:29
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Andrew Garner 18:36
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 18:49
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 18:57
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 19:15
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 19:29
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 19:35
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan 19:42
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 19:49
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan 20:05
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 20:22
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Gregory Stark 20:30
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Martijn van Oosterhout 20:40
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg 21:04
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Decibel! 21:29
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 21:39
Re: CVS Head psql bug? Guillaume Smet 22:12
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dawid Kuroczko 22:16
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Martijn van Oosterhout 22:24
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 22:48
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark 22:54
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 23:04
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Dunstan 23:09
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane 23:13
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor 23:17
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane 23:18
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor 23:39
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor 23:54

July 29, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane 00:06
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth 00:13
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 00:49
Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter 01:24
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 01:31
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor 05:23
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? tomas 06:05
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Pavel Stehule 06:42
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Heikki Linnakangas 07:23
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Jan Urbański 07:27
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut 07:53
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Peter Eisentraut 07:58
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Heikki Linnakangas 08:01
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Peter Eisentraut 08:03
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Peter Eisentraut 08:41
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen 10:12
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Asko Oja 10:52
Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?) Stephen R. van den Berg 10:55
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Gregory Stark 10:56
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Asko Oja 10:56
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost 11:08
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Greg Sabino Mullane 11:24
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Peter Eisentraut 12:21
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] KaiGai Kohei 12:24
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Peter Eisentraut 12:25
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Robert Haas 12:31
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost 13:03
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost 13:11
pg_regress inputdir 📎 Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway 13:16
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Zdenek Kotala 13:26
Re: Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?) Stephen R. van den Berg 14:03
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas 14:27
Location of ident code Magnus Hagander 14:41
Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera 14:43
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane 14:56
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Tom Lane 15:08
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Gregory Stark 15:48
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 15:58
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 16:09
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane 16:24
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing 16:27
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane 16:46
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Asko Oja 16:48
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 16:59
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Greg Smith 17:03
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing 17:10
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Andrew Dunstan 17:23
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 18:01
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 18:03
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Robert Haas 18:21
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 18:41
Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler 18:53
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Zdenek Kotala 19:12
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane 19:15
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Zdenek Kotala 19:19
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql David Fetter 19:24
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane 20:12
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler 20:24
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane 21:00
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler 21:15
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane 21:33
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler 22:06
Re: about postgres-r setup. Markus Wanner 22:14
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 📎 Jan Urbański 22:17
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane 22:35
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler 23:22
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane 23:45
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler 23:53

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31