pgsql-hackers since 2012-09-06 02:07

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Sept. 6, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows Bruce Momjian 02:07
Re: Draft release notes complete Bruce Momjian 02:08
Re: Draft release notes complete Andrew Dunstan 02:12
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Tom Lane 02:14
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Andrew Dunstan 02:29
Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows 📎 Andrew Dunstan 02:35
Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows Bruce Momjian 02:41
Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows Bruce Momjian 02:45
Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows Andrew Dunstan 02:46
Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows Bruce Momjian 02:57
Re: Draft release notes complete Stephen Frost 03:01
Re: too much pgbench init output Peter Eisentraut 03:14
Re: [repost] Help me develop new commit_delay advice Greg Smith 03:20
Re: Draft release notes complete Andrew Dunstan 03:33
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav Greg Smith 03:43
Re: Draft release notes complete Stephen Frost 03:44
Re: Draft release notes complete Andrew Dunstan 03:54
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Daniel Farina 04:44
Behavior difference for walsender and walreceiver for n/w breakdown case Amit Kapila 06:09
Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management 📎 Amit kapila 09:08
Re: txid failed epoch increment, again, aka 6291 Noah Misch 10:04
Re: Draft release notes complete Alvaro Herrera 13:00
Issue observed in cascade standby setup and analysis for same Amit Kapila 14:06
Re: embedded list v2 📎 Alvaro Herrera 16:09
Re: Issue observed in cascade standby setup and analysis for same Josh Berkus 16:28
Re: embedded list v2 Robert Haas 17:01
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Jeff Davis 17:56
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Robert Haas 19:39
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Tom Lane 19:55
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Robert Haas 20:07
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Heikki Linnakangas 20:08
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Robert Haas 20:10
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Tom Lane 20:23
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Boy de Laat 20:24
Re: Minor document updates Robert Haas 21:01
Re: bug of pg_trgm? Andrew Dunstan 21:02
Re: Reduce the time to know trigger_file's existence Robert Haas 21:03
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Robert Haas 21:06
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Alvaro Herrera 21:07
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Robert Haas 21:08
Re: bug of pg_trgm? Tom Lane 21:09
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Alvaro Herrera 21:13
Re: bug of pg_trgm? Andrew Dunstan 21:24

Sept. 7, 2012

Thread Author Time
improving python3 regression test setup 📎 Peter Eisentraut 00:33
Re: improving python3 regression test setup Alvaro Herrera 00:56
Re: 9.2rc1 produces incorrect results 📎 Tom Lane 02:54
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Pavan Deolasee 03:48
pg_dump transaction's read-only mode Pavan Deolasee 04:52
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Gezeala M. Bacuño II 06:45
Re: txid failed epoch increment, again, aka 6291 Daniel Farina 08:37
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Pavan Deolasee 09:19
Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode Kevin Grittner 12:36
Re: txid failed epoch increment, again, aka 6291 📎 Noah Misch 12:49
Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management 📎 Amit kapila 13:14
Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Pavan Deolasee 13:29
Re: Draft release notes complete Magnus Hagander 13:57
Re: Issue observed in cascade standby setup and analysis for same Amit Kapila 14:53
Re: Draft release notes complete Andrew Dunstan 16:50
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol 📎 Tom Lane 17:49
Re: improving python3 regression test setup Peter Eisentraut 18:05
Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Pavan Deolasee 18:29
Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Gezeala M. Bacuño II 18:40
Re: txid failed epoch increment, again, aka 6291 Daniel Farina 18:47
Re: Draft release notes complete Alvaro Herrera 19:07
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Heikki Linnakangas 19:31
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Tom Lane 19:38
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol 📎 Tom Lane 20:10
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Merlin Moncure 21:21
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Andres Freund 21:22
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Jim Nasby 21:47
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 23:17

Sept. 8, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 00:43
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Gurjeet Singh 01:54
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 01:55
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 02:46
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 04:03
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Albert Cervera i Areny 14:52
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 15:06
patch: disable bypass of expand variadic for "ANY" variable function, format_array function for formatting with params in array 📎 Pavel Stehule 15:10
Re: patch: disable bypass of expand variadic for "ANY" variable function, format_array function for formatting with params in array Tom Lane 15:23
Re: patch: disable bypass of expand variadic for "ANY" variable function, format_array function for formatting with params in array Pavel Stehule 15:57
Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Jeff Davis 18:34
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 19:48
Python version dependency in plpython regression tests Tom Lane 20:35
Re: Python version dependency in plpython regression tests Peter Eisentraut 20:46
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 20:46
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 20:52
Re: Python version dependency in plpython regression tests Tom Lane 20:52
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 20:54
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 20:58
pg_test_fsync output and commit_delay 📎 Peter Geoghegan 21:26
pg_upgrade testing for MSVC 📎 Andrew Dunstan 21:31
Re: pg_test_fsync output and commit_delay Josh Berkus 22:27
Supporting plpython 2+3 builds better 📎 Tom Lane 23:18
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 23:20
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 23:54

Sept. 9, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 00:35
Re: Python version dependency in plpython regression tests Peter Eisentraut 01:20
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Peter Eisentraut 01:26
Re: Supporting plpython 2+3 builds better Peter Eisentraut 01:42
Re: [BUGS] BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump Gezeala M. Bacuño II 05:59
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 07:29
Re: Supporting plpython 2+3 builds better Tom Lane 07:35
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Amit kapila 08:06
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 15:14
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Tom Lane 15:15
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Andres Freund 15:23
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 15:31
Re: embedded list v2 Andres Freund 15:36
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 15:45
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 15:50
Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2 Andres Freund 15:54
a sentence in sepgsql.sgml says 180-degree opposite 📎 Kohei KaiGai 17:06
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 18:05
Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2 Tom Lane 18:40
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 18:43
Re: Draft release notes complete Stefan Kaltenbrunner 18:52
Re: Draft release notes complete Stefan Kaltenbrunner 18:56
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 18:57
Re: Draft release notes complete Stefan Kaltenbrunner 18:58
Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2 Andres Freund 20:14
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Peter Eisentraut 20:32
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Peter Eisentraut 20:35
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 20:54
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 21:00
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 21:18

Sept. 10, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Amit Kapila 03:29
Re: Minor document updates Etsuro Fujita 03:29
Re: reviewing the "Reduce sinval synchronization overhead" patch / b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4 Nils Goroll 07:46
Re: ALTER command reworks 📎 Kohei KaiGai 11:08
Re: Supporting plpython 2+3 builds better 📎 Peter Eisentraut 12:50
Re: Supporting plpython 2+3 builds better Alvaro Herrera 13:26
Enum binary access Petr Chmelar 13:42
Re: Enum binary access Merlin Moncure 14:33
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Amit Kapila 14:50
Re: Draft release notes complete Bruce Momjian 14:55
Re: Draft release notes complete Alvaro Herrera 15:06
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Gurjeet Singh 15:12
Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management 📎 Amit kapila 15:16
Re: Draft release notes complete Bruce Momjian 15:19
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Aidan Van Dyk 15:28
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Heikki Linnakangas 15:43
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Kevin Grittner 16:15
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Gurjeet Singh 16:25
Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode Pavan Deolasee 16:30
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Tom Lane 16:50
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Josh Berkus 16:59
Re: Supporting plpython 2+3 builds better Peter Eisentraut 17:14
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Kevin Grittner 17:16
Extend argument of OAT_POST_CREATE 📎 Kohei KaiGai 17:27
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Jeff Davis 17:52
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Kevin Grittner 18:38
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Tom Lane 18:44
Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results Andrew Dunstan 18:51
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol Daniel Farina 21:02
ossp-uuid Contrib Patch David E. Wheeler 22:14
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch Tom Lane 23:16
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch David E. Wheeler 23:23

Sept. 11, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch Tom Lane 00:15
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch Peter Eisentraut 01:01
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch Peter Eisentraut 01:05
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Dan Ports 01:59
Re: Draft release notes complete Bruce Momjian 02:17
Re: 64-bit API for large object 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 02:36
Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes 📎 Dan Scott 03:59
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Jeff Davis 05:44
prefetching and asynchronous io johnlumby 05:53
Re: Draft release notes complete Stefan Kaltenbrunner 06:27
Re: gistchoose vs. bloat Jeff Davis 06:35
Re: gistchoose vs. bloat Alexander Korotkov 06:43
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts 📎 Jeff Davis 07:13
Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink 📎 Shigeru HANADA 09:30
[Feature Request] explaining sql statements executed in UDF's Hassan Syed 13:37
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol 📎 Amit kapila 13:37
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Alvaro Herrera 15:39
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Kohei KaiGai 15:46
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Alvaro Herrera 15:58
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Kohei KaiGai 16:25
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Alvaro Herrera 16:35
Math and logic mistakes in tsquery_opr_selec Tom Lane 16:49
Switching timeline over streaming replication 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 17:23
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Boszormenyi Zoltan 17:29
Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Kevin Grittner 20:34
Re: Draft release notes complete Bruce Momjian 21:13
Cast Operator Precedence David E. Wheeler 23:23
Re: Cast Operator Precedence Tom Lane 23:39

Sept. 12, 2012

Thread Author Time
Correction to comment regarding atomicity of an operation Gurjeet Singh 00:02
Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes Kevin Grittner 00:52
Re: Correction to comment regarding atomicity of an operation Amit Kapila 03:19
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Amit Kapila 03:30
Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts Dan Ports 03:43
Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Alvaro Herrera 03:50
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch David E. Wheeler 03:58
Re: ossp-uuid Contrib Patch David E. Wheeler 03:58
Re: Cast Operator Precedence David E. Wheeler 04:00
Comment typo 📎 Etsuro Fujita 07:20
Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes Magnus Hagander 07:25
slow hashjoin - NTUP_PER_BUCKET again Pavel Stehule 08:08
Re: Correction to comment regarding atomicity of an operation Gurjeet Singh 10:44
Re: Issue observed in cascade standby setup and analysis for same Amit Kapila 11:35

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30