pgsql-hackers since 2015-08-13 13:44
The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!
Search the Archives
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next
Aug. 13, 2015
Aug. 14, 2015
Thread |
Author |
Time |
Multi-tenancy with RLS 📎
|
Haribabu Kommi |
02:00 |
Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving,
PITR, etc. 📎
|
Michael Paquier |
03:32 |
Re: Test code is worth the space
|
Jim Nasby |
05:11 |
Re: TAP tests are badly named
|
Noah Misch |
07:32 |
Re: replication slot restart_lsn initialization
|
Michael Paquier |
07:44 |
Re: replication slot restart_lsn initialization
|
Andres Freund |
07:54 |
Re: replication slot restart_lsn initialization
|
Shulgin, Oleksandr |
09:09 |
Re: replication slot restart_lsn initialization
|
Andres Freund |
09:10 |
Configure checks and optimizations/crc32 tests
|
Andres Freund |
09:20 |
query in PostgreSQL
|
Rahul Majumdar/TVM/TCS |
09:32 |
Re: query in PostgreSQL
|
Thomas Munro |
09:45 |
Re: commitfest app bug/feature
|
Magnus Hagander |
10:37 |
Re: Test code is worth the space
|
Simon Riggs |
11:47 |
Re: Configure checks and optimizations/crc32 tests
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
12:35 |
Re: buildfarm does not test "make check"
|
Robert Haas |
13:27 |
Re: TAP tests are badly named
|
Andrew Dunstan |
13:27 |
Re: TAP tests are badly named 📎
|
Andrew Dunstan |
13:31 |
Re: buildfarm does not test "make check"
|
Andrew Dunstan |
13:32 |
why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?
|
Robert Haas |
13:33 |
Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something
more descriptive
|
Alexander Korotkov |
13:53 |
Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more
descriptive
|
Tom Lane |
14:11 |
Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting
process?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
14:14 |
Re: Configure checks and optimizations/crc32 tests
|
Andres Freund |
16:27 |
How to compile, link and use a C++ extension
|
jacques klein |
16:38 |
Re: Configure checks and optimizations/crc32 tests
|
Andres Freund |
16:42 |
Management of simple_eval_estate for plpgsql DO blocks
|
Tom Lane |
16:42 |
Re: How to compile, link and use a C++ extension
|
Andres Freund |
16:51 |
Re: How to compile, link and use a C++ extension
|
Tom Lane |
17:28 |
Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?
|
Robert Haas |
18:00 |
Re: How to compile, link and use a C++ extension
|
Peter Geoghegan |
18:10 |
Re: How to compile, link and use a C++ extension
|
Andres Freund |
18:16 |
FDW question - how to identify columns to populate in response?
|
Bear Giles |
18:18 |
Re: Management of simple_eval_estate for plpgsql DO blocks
|
Andrew Dunstan |
18:27 |
Re: How to compile, link and use a C++ extension
|
Andrew Dunstan |
18:30 |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 📎
|
Andres Freund |
18:40 |
Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting
process?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
18:57 |
Re: FDW question - how to identify columns to populate in response?
|
Tom Lane |
21:13 |
alter-table-1 isolation test spec contains a duplicate step name
|
Robert Haas |
21:13 |
Re: alter-table-1 isolation test spec contains a duplicate step name
|
Tom Lane |
21:18 |
[RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART, TO_CHAR and
so on.
|
Dickson S. Guedes |
23:58 |
Aug. 15, 2015
Thread |
Author |
Time |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART, TO_CHAR
and so on. 📎
|
Dickson S. Guedes |
00:09 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Gavin Flower |
00:32 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
David G. Johnston |
00:40 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Dickson S. Guedes |
01:06 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Gavin Flower |
01:09 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Dickson S. Guedes |
01:11 |
Re: Test code is worth the space
|
Jim Nasby |
01:35 |
Re: alter-table-1 isolation test spec contains a duplicate step name
|
Robert Haas |
02:15 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
David G. Johnston |
02:26 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Robert Haas |
03:04 |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
|
Robert Haas |
03:08 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Tom Lane |
03:55 |
Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process? 📎
|
Robert Haas |
04:17 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT, DATE_PART,
TO_CHAR and so on.
|
Dickson S. Guedes |
04:48 |
Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?
|
Tom Lane |
05:16 |
Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting
process?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
05:17 |
Re: Test code is worth the space
|
Petr Jelinek |
09:45 |
Small improvement to get_base_rel_indexes() 📎
|
David Rowley |
10:45 |
Re: replication slot restart_lsn initialization 📎
|
Michael Paquier |
12:16 |
Add support for RADIUS passwords longer than 16 octets 📎
|
Marko Tiikkaja |
15:55 |
Re: [RFC] allow 'semester' in functions EXTRACT,
DATE_PART, TO_CHAR and so on.
|
David Fetter |
16:18 |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
|
Noah Misch |
16:47 |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
|
Andres Freund |
17:01 |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
|
Tom Lane |
17:48 |
Re: Small improvement to get_base_rel_indexes()
|
Tom Lane |
19:05 |
Potential GIN vacuum bug
|
Jeff Janes |
21:58 |
DTrace build dependency rules 📎
|
Mark Johnston |
22:45 |
Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
|
Noah Misch |
22:47 |
Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING
|
Zhaomo Yang |
23:30 |
Aug. 16, 2015
Aug. 17, 2015
Aug. 18, 2015
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next