pgsql-hackers since 2016-01-11 18:33

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Jan. 11, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Pavel Stehule 18:33
Re: Speedup twophase transactions 📎 Jesper Pedersen 18:40
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Jim Nasby 18:41
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 18:43
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Pavel Stehule 18:46
Re: Making plpython 2 and 3 coexist a bit better Jim Nasby 18:50
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Jesper Pedersen 18:51
Re: Making plpython 2 and 3 coexist a bit better 📎 Tom Lane 19:00
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Andres Freund 19:03
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Andres Freund 19:07
Re: 2016-01 Commitfest Peter Geoghegan 19:08
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Jim Nasby 19:11
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 19:15
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 19:16
Re: Making plpython 2 and 3 coexist a bit better Jim Nasby 19:17
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Andres Freund 19:18
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 19:20
Re: PATCH: Extending the HyperLogLog API a bit Alvaro Herrera 19:22
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Andres Freund 19:27
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 19:39
Re: Making plpython 2 and 3 coexist a bit better Tom Lane 19:46
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Vladimir Sitnikov 19:50
Re: Speedup twophase transactions 📎 Simon Riggs 19:57
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Edson Richter 19:59
Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases Alvaro Herrera 20:03
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Andres Freund 20:10
Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases Tom Lane 20:12
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Vladimir Sitnikov 20:42
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Edson Richter 20:49
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Vladimir Sitnikov 20:54
Re: Weighted Stats David Fetter 21:26
Re: PATCH: add pg_current_xlog_flush_location function Simon Riggs 21:35
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 21:46
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Andres Freund 22:24
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Vladimir Sitnikov 22:31
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Vladimir Sitnikov 22:35
Re: Driver behaves differently with prepareThreshold and timestamp fields when daylights is active (was Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102) Edson Richter 22:44
pg_dump fails on domain constraint comments 📎 Elvis Pranskevichus 22:56
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Stas Kelvich 23:11
Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Alvaro Herrera 23:31
Re: Making plpython 2 and 3 coexist a bit better 📎 Tom Lane 23:33
Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering Alvaro Herrera 23:50
Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Tom Lane 23:57

Jan. 12, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex Alvaro Herrera 00:16
Re: Spelling corrections Peter Geoghegan 00:34
Re: ExecGather() + nworkers Peter Geoghegan 01:20
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Amit Langote 01:30
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Amit Langote 02:21
Re: pg_conversion seems rather strangely defined Tatsuo Ishii 02:26
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Vinayak Pokale 02:28
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Vinayak Pokale 02:35
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 04:28
Re: Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations 📎 Michael Paquier 04:55
Re: Speedup twophase transactions 📎 Simon Riggs 05:14
Re: PATCH: add pg_current_xlog_flush_location function Michael Paquier 05:58
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Michael Paquier 06:35
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Michael Paquier 06:41
Re: Proposal: BSD Authentication support 📎 Marisa Emerson 07:27
Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions 📎 Michael Paquier 07:51
Re: PATCH: add pg_current_xlog_flush_location function Simon Riggs 07:59
Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex Aleksander Alekseev 08:20
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 08:21
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 08:26
Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions Fabien COELHO 08:52
Re: Minor code improvements to create_foreignscan_plan/ExecInitForeignScan Etsuro Fujita 09:00
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer 09:03
Re: Relation extension scalability 📎 Dilip Kumar 09:11
Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Teodor Sigaev 09:36
Re: Removing Functionally Dependent GROUP BY Columns Julien Rouhaud 10:37
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 10:44
Question about DROP TABLE Michal Novotny 10:57
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Pavel Stehule 11:01
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Andres Freund 11:05
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer 11:11
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Michal Novotny 11:14
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Michal Novotny 11:17
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Pavel Stehule 11:17
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. 📎 Anastasia Lubennikova 11:19
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Andres Freund 11:20
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Marko Tiikkaja 11:22
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Pavel Stehule 11:25
Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW 📎 Etsuro Fujita 11:26
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 11:26
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Michal Novotny 11:27
Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW Rushabh Lathia 11:31
Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) Thom Brown 11:36
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Andres Freund 11:37
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer 11:38
Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex Andres Freund 11:45
Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) Etsuro Fujita 11:49
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 11:52
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Michal Novotny 11:55
Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer 12:00
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja 12:15
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Albe Laurenz 12:15
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer 12:17
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer 12:19
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Amit Kapila 12:20
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Andres Freund 12:22
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Jeremy Whiting 12:33
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 12:37
Allow to specify (auto-)vacuum cost limits relative to the database/cluster size? Andres Freund 12:42
Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions Michael Paquier 12:44
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Michael Paquier 12:49
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Michael Paquier 12:53
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Fabien COELHO 12:54
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 📎 Vladimir Sitnikov 13:26
Re: Question about DROP TABLE Michal Novotny 13:32
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Amit Kapila 13:47
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Andres Freund 13:48
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Andres Freund 13:54
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Albe Laurenz 14:08
Re: Speedup twophase transactions 📎 Jesper Pedersen 14:48
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. 📎 Masahiko Sawada 15:16
pgbench doc typos 📎 Erik Rijkers 15:27
Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex Alvaro Herrera 15:51
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 15:52
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule 15:55
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Alvaro Herrera 15:56
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 16:01
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule 16:16
Re: count_nulls(VARIADIC "any") Marko Tiikkaja 16:27
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Pavel Stehule 16:50
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Alvaro Herrera 16:54
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Catalin Iacob 16:59
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. 📎 Anastasia Lubennikova 16:59
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Pavel Stehule 17:05
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Catalin Iacob 17:25
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Jeff Janes 17:47
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Andres Freund 18:14
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Stas Kelvich 19:53
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 19:57
Re: Speedup twophase transactions Simon Riggs 20:30
pg_dump dumps event triggers and transforms unconditionally Tom Lane 20:37
Re: pg_dump dumps event triggers and transforms unconditionally Alvaro Herrera 20:56
Re: WIP: Rework access method interface Alvaro Herrera 21:11
Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization Adam Brightwell 22:12
Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization Adam Brightwell 22:13
Re: pg_dump dumps event triggers and transforms unconditionally Tom Lane 22:13
Re: WIP: Rework access method interface Tom Lane 22:17
Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff Alvaro Herrera 22:32
blocking the alter role command JotaComm 22:32
Re: blocking the alter role command Fabrízio de Royes Mello 22:39
Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION Jim Nasby 22:44
Re: Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION Tom Lane 23:00

Jan. 13, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: pg_dump and premature optimizations for objects not to be dumped 📎 Tom Lane 00:20
PGCon 2016 CFP - one week left Dan Langille 01:23
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. David Rowley 01:27
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. David Rowley 01:47
Re: Some bugs in psql_complete of psql Peter Eisentraut 02:46
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Amit Kapila 03:17
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Amit Langote 06:16
Re: ExecGather() + nworkers 📎 Amit Kapila 08:19
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 10:44
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Anastasia Lubennikova 12:56
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule 13:12
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 13:27
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja 13:28
Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions 📎 Fabien COELHO 13:28
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja 13:30
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 13:36
Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff Fabien COELHO 13:37
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja 13:47
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Anastasia Lubennikova 13:58
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 14:02
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Andres Freund 14:12
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Chapman Flack 14:25
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 14:26
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja 14:33
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 14:34
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Andres Freund 14:35
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja 14:36
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 14:38
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Andres Freund 14:43
pgindent-polluted commits Noah Misch 14:48
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 14:49
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 15:17
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Albe Laurenz 15:18
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 15:22
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule 15:34
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule 15:43
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Tom Lane 15:47
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 15:57
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov 16:12
Re: pg_dump and premature optimizations for objects not to be dumped Tom Lane 16:24
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule 16:45
Python 3.x versus PG 9.1 branch 📎 Tom Lane 16:46
Re: pgindent-polluted commits Simon Riggs 16:54
Re: pgindent-polluted commits Tom Lane 17:13
Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Jim Nasby 18:40
Re: pgindent-polluted commits Mark Dilger 19:07
Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Jeff Janes 19:14
Re: Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION Jim Nasby 19:16
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. David Rowley 19:24
Re: pgindent-polluted commits Peter Geoghegan 20:03
Re: pg_dump and premature optimizations for objects not to be dumped 📎 Tom Lane 20:05
Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Tom Lane 20:37
Re: Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION 📎 Tom Lane 22:00
PgConf.US Hackers Track CFP Joshua D. Drake 22:02
Truncation of identifiers Thomas Munro 22:26

Browse Archives

Prev | Next