pgsql-hackers since 2018-01-09 20:11
The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!
Search the Archives
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next
Jan. 9, 2018
Jan. 10, 2018
Jan. 11, 2018
Thread |
Author |
Time |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
|
Tom Lane |
00:09 |
Re: [PATCH] GET DIAGNOSTICS FUNCTION_NAME
|
Yugo Nagata |
02:03 |
Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes
|
Masahiko Sawada |
02:17 |
Re: refactor subscription tests to use PostgresNode's
wait_for_catchup
|
Peter Eisentraut |
02:45 |
Re: refactor subscription tests to use PostgresNode's
wait_for_catchup
|
Michael Paquier |
03:24 |
Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
|
Noah Misch |
05:08 |
Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
|
David Rowley |
05:14 |
Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
|
Amit Khandekar |
05:18 |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
|
Rushabh Lathia |
06:17 |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
|
David Rowley |
06:21 |
numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Chapman Flack |
06:22 |
Re: [HACKERS] Planning counters in pg_stat_statements
|
Haribabu Kommi |
06:36 |
RE: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
|
Christian Ullrich |
06:42 |
pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
|
Michael Paquier |
06:49 |
Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots 📎
|
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
06:59 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Tom Lane |
07:07 |
Re: Incorrect comment for expand_single_inheritance_child
|
Etsuro Fujita |
07:53 |
Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient
|
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
07:54 |
Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly 📎
|
Etsuro Fujita |
07:58 |
Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use
strcmp
|
Michael Paquier |
08:01 |
Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? 📎
|
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
08:03 |
Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution 📎
|
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
08:08 |
Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
|
Antonin Houska |
09:34 |
Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster
partition pruning 📎
|
Amit Langote |
09:52 |
Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
|
Sergei Kornilov |
09:55 |
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
|
Amit Langote |
10:00 |
Re: [HACKERS] Creating backup history files for backups taken from standbys
|
Masahiko Sawada |
10:10 |
Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
|
Andrey Borodin |
10:14 |
Minor code improvement to estimate_path_cost_size in postgres_fdw 📎
|
Tatsuro Yamada |
10:14 |
Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster
partition pruning
|
David Rowley |
10:23 |
Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster
partition pruning
|
David Rowley |
10:40 |
Re: [HACKERS] Planning counters in pg_stat_statements 📎
|
Thomas Munro |
11:00 |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY 📎
|
Alexander Korotkov |
11:00 |
Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping 📎
|
Jeevan Chalke |
11:00 |
Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
|
Amit Khandekar |
11:07 |
add queryEnv to ExplainOneQuery_hook 📎
|
Tatsuro Yamada |
11:16 |
Re: add queryEnv to ExplainOneQuery_hook
|
Thomas Munro |
11:43 |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
|
Teodor Sigaev |
11:56 |
Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations 📎
|
Konstantin Knizhnik |
11:59 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Chapman Flack |
12:26 |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
|
Alvaro Herrera |
12:27 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= |
12:39 |
Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
|
Marina Polyakova |
12:42 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Sergei Kornilov |
12:44 |
Re: add queryEnv to ExplainOneQuery_hook
|
Michael Paquier |
12:46 |
Re: [HACKERS] Creating backup history files for backups taken from
standbys
|
Michael Paquier |
12:47 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= |
12:54 |
Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
|
Greg Stark |
13:56 |
Re: [HACKERS] Early locking option to parallel backup
|
Stephen Frost |
14:02 |
Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of
partition key
|
Stephen Frost |
14:36 |
Re: [HACKERS] [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)
|
David Fetter |
14:43 |
Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
|
Andrew Dunstan |
15:16 |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
|
Tom Lane |
15:19 |
Animals baiji, mastodon and narwhal
|
Dave Page |
15:20 |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
|
Alvaro Herrera |
15:42 |
Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
|
Tom Lane |
15:42 |
The first function call
|
Diego Silva e Silva |
15:52 |
Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench 📎
|
Ildar Musin |
15:53 |
Re: [HACKERS] PoC: custom signal handler for extensions
|
Arthur Zakirov |
15:53 |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
|
Tom Lane |
15:55 |
Identifying ALTER TABLE "sub-command"
|
Jeremy Finzel |
15:56 |
Re: The first function call
|
Tom Lane |
15:59 |
Re: The first function call
|
David G. Johnston |
16:01 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Chapman Flack |
16:16 |
Re: Identifying ALTER TABLE "sub-command" 📎
|
Sergei Kornilov |
16:19 |
Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench
|
Ildar Musin |
16:21 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
16:23 |
Re: Identifying ALTER TABLE "sub-command"
|
Alvaro Herrera |
16:25 |
Re: numeric regression test passes, but why?
|
Chapman Flack |
16:30 |
[PATCH] ECPG bug fix in preproc when indicator struct is shorter than
record struct 📎
|
Rader, David |
16:47 |
Re: Minor code improvement to estimate_path_cost_size in postgres_fdw
|
Tom Lane |
16:54 |
Re: add queryEnv to ExplainOneQuery_hook
|
Tom Lane |
17:02 |
master make check fails on Solaris 10 📎
|
Marina Polyakova |
17:21 |
Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant 📎
|
Stephen Frost |
17:22 |
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next