pgsql-hackers since 2018-01-28 22:02

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Jan. 28, 2018

Thread Author Time
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Pierre Ducroquet 22:02
Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots Thomas Munro 22:07
Re: Write lifetime hints for NVMe Dmitry Dolgov 22:09
Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach Peter Geoghegan 22:31
Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian 23:00
Re: Documentation of pgcrypto AES key sizes 📎 Thomas Munro 23:02
Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts 📎 Rady, Doug 23:02
Re: Built-in connection pooling Ivan Novick 23:11
Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit 📎 Bruce Momjian 23:35
Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10) Bruce Momjian 23:53

Jan. 29, 2018

Thread Author Time
Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian 00:16
Re: list partition constraint shape Amit Langote 00:50
Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables Amit Langote 01:08
Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop Craig Ringer 01:43
Re: Invalid result from hash_page_items function Masahiko Sawada 02:25
Re: Boolean partitions syntax Amit Langote 02:45
Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables Michael Paquier 03:03
Re: Updating timezone data to 2018c Michael Paquier 03:06
Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Amit Kapila 03:13
Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop Tom Lane 04:07
Re: Boolean partitions syntax 📎 Amit Langote 04:21
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension Jing Wang 04:29
Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop Craig Ringer 04:31
Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations Thomas Munro 04:34
Re: Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Tom Lane 04:35
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Michael Paquier 04:43
Linking PostgreSQL as a C++ program Craig Ringer 04:46
Re: Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Thomas Munro 04:48
Re: Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Thomas Munro 04:59
Re: Linking PostgreSQL as a C++ program Michael Paquier 05:02
Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Masahiko Sawada 05:03
Re: Linking PostgreSQL as a C++ program Craig Ringer 05:03
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation 📎 Yuto Hayamizu 05:12
Re: CREATE ROUTINE MAPPING Ashutosh Bapat 05:12
Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause Ashutosh Bapat 05:40
Re: Boolean partitions syntax Tom Lane 05:57
Re: list partition constraint shape 📎 Etsuro Fujita 06:15
Re: Reorder C includes in partition.c Etsuro Fujita 06:19
Re: list partition constraint shape Amit Langote 06:22
RE: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Tsunakawa, Takayuki 06:33
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Pierre Ducroquet 06:59
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Masahiko Sawada 07:12
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Nikhil Sontakke 07:15
Re: Query related to alter table ... attach partition Ashutosh Bapat 07:25
Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables 📎 Amit Langote 07:28
A Generic Question about Generic type subscripting Hannu Krosing 07:45
Re: pgsql: Local partitioned indexes 📎 Amit Langote 08:04
Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host Michael Paquier 08:06
Re: Regarding ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup index methods Masahiko Sawada 08:18
Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables Amit Langote 08:29
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down Antonin Houska 08:32
Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping 📎 Jeevan Chalke 08:42
Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11) Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 08:50
Re: Built-in connection pooling Konstantin Knizhnik 08:57
Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts Fabien COELHO 08:58
Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11) Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 09:01
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 09:36
Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench 📎 Ildar Musin 09:43
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 09:46
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1 Andres Freund 09:53
Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)? David Rowley 09:55
Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)? 📎 David Rowley 10:12
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Pierre Ducroquet 10:20
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs 10:23
Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots 📎 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 10:26
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups Masahiko Sawada 10:28
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs 10:38
Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots 📎 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 10:40
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views 📎 Yugo Nagata 11:25
Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods 📎 Ildus Kurbangaliev 11:44
Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench Fabien COELHO 12:03
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 📎 Konstantin Knizhnik 12:45
Re: A Generic Question about Generic type subscripting Arthur Zakirov 12:47
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups Michael Paquier 12:54
Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench Ildar Musin 12:55
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Jesper Pedersen 13:13
Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations 📎 Konstantin Knizhnik 13:24
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Tomas Vondra 13:34
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting Arthur Zakirov 13:41
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs 13:49
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down Chapman Flack 14:01
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 📎 Simon Riggs 14:11
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Tomas Vondra 14:13
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups David Steele 14:13
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs 14:17
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavel Stehule 14:19
Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Ildar Musin 14:29
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Claudio Freire 14:31
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 14:40
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down Robert Haas 14:43
Re: Cancelling parallel query leads to segfault Robert Haas 14:51
Re: \describe* Ryan Murphy 14:51
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavel Stehule 14:55
Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach Robert Haas 14:55
Re: \describe* David Fetter 14:56
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Robert Haas 15:07
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 15:12
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 15:32
Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian 15:34
Re: A Generic Question about Generic type subscripting Tom Lane 15:42
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Bruce Momjian 15:44
Re: Built-in connection pooling Vladimir Sitnikov 16:02
Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Ildus Kurbangaliev 16:04
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Tom Lane 16:06
Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian 16:06
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 16:13
dsa_allocate() faliure Rick Otten 16:19
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Chapman Flack 16:23
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 16:34
Re: dsa_allocate() faliure Tom Lane 16:37
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Bruce Momjian 16:44
Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations 📎 Konstantin Knizhnik 16:46
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Tom Lane 16:50
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 16:51
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions 📎 Oliver Ford 16:55
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 17:00
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 17:03
Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Tomas Vondra 17:04
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 17:08
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavel Stehule 17:18
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan 17:23
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan 17:35
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 18:14
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups David Steele 18:17
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Jeff Davis 18:28
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions 📎 Nikhil Sontakke 18:35
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 18:40
Re: Built-in connection pooling Vladimir Sitnikov 19:06
Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables Peter Eisentraut 20:30
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan 20:41
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups Adam Brightwell 20:45
Re: dsa_allocate() faliure Thomas Munro 20:52
Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries 📎 Andres Freund 21:05
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Tom Lane 21:28
Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask 📎 David Steele 21:29
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 21:34
Re: dsa_allocate() faliure Rick Otten 21:35
VALUES nodes and expression initialization Andres Freund 21:46
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 📎 Tomas Vondra 21:51
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 21:57
Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions 📎 Robert Haas 22:00
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Tomas Vondra 22:01
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Oliver Ford 22:09
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 22:17
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan 22:31
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 📎 Tomas Vondra 22:49
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Tom Lane 22:50
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Oliver Ford 23:05
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 23:15
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Tomas Vondra 23:16
[PATCH] pgbench - refactor some connection finish/null into common function 📎 Rady, Doug 23:20
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund 23:24
Re: Security leak with trigger functions? Peter Eisentraut 23:45

Jan. 30, 2018

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Peter Geoghegan 00:06
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Michael Paquier 00:15
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Tom Lane 00:28
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Peter Eisentraut 00:39
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote 00:57
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups Masahiko Sawada 01:10
Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)? David G. Johnston 01:14
Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups David Steele 01:44
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1 Craig Ringer 02:03
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support 📎 Peter Eisentraut 02:16
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Andres Freund 02:24
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Michael Paquier 03:33
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Michael Paquier 03:36
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Tom Lane 03:41
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Andres Freund 04:03
Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host Haribabu Kommi 04:10
Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Masahiko Sawada 04:36
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Jeff Davis 04:53
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Michael Paquier 04:53
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views Tatsuo Ishii 04:58
Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host Michael Paquier 05:02
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views 📎 Yugo Nagata 05:17
RE: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Tsunakawa, Takayuki 05:43
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views Tatsuo Ishii 05:48
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views Thomas Munro 06:21
Re: PATCH: pgbench - break out timing data for initialization phases Fabien COELHO 07:52
Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask Michael Paquier 08:01
Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan Tatsuro Yamada 08:06
Re: [HACKERS] generated columns Michael Paquier 08:17
csv format for psql 📎 Daniel Verite 08:31
Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Michael Meskes 08:31
Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory Yoshimi Ichiyanagi 08:37
Regarding drop index Abinaya Kajendiran 09:12
Re: csv format for psql Fabien COELHO 09:14
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 📎 Simon Riggs 09:16
Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing Etsuro Fujita 09:22
Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause Alexander Kuzmenkov 09:31
Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication atorikoshi 09:36
Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing Amit Langote 09:39
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs 09:45
Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables Amit Langote 09:49
Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing Etsuro Fujita 09:52
Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements Masahiko Sawada 10:00
Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data 📎 John Naylor 10:13
Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Oliver Ford 10:48
Re: [PATCH] pgbench - refactor some connection finish/null into common function Fabien COELHO 11:41
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning 📎 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 11:43

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31