Discussion of PostgreSQL's performance issues. Please see Guide to reporting problems and Slow Query Questions for some tips on how to write your performance question.
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| RE: proposal: schema variables | DUVAL REMI | 15:44 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 18:54 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 21:15 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 16:05 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 16:14 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 18:12 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | David Rowley | 02:47 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Justin Pryzby | 03:10 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 10:15 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 10:31 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Justin Pryzby | 12:12 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 13:08 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 13:16 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | David Rowley | 21:43 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Richard Michael | 19:31 |
| Re: Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Justin Pryzby | 21:59 |
| Re: Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Tom Lane | 22:54 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Justin Pryzby | 20:43 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 18:44 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 05:58 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 07:18 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 08:28 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 12:02 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Andreas Kretschmer | 13:37 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Tom Lane | 14:26 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 15:45 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 15:59 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Tom Lane | 19:35 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 21:13 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Tom Lane | 22:55 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 07:40 |
| JOIN on partitions is very slow | daya airody | 17:22 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | Michael Lewis | 18:08 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Partitions to improve write/update speed for tables with indexes? | Arya F | 01:22 |
| Re: Partitions to improve write/update speed for tables with indexes? | Justin Pryzby | 01:29 |
| Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 | Ronnie S | 03:45 |
| Re: Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 | Justin Pryzby | 04:10 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | daya airody | 07:40 |
| Re: Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 | Ronnie S | 14:18 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | Michael Lewis | 16:16 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | Thomas Kellerer | 16:33 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Random function | Luis Roberto Weck | 18:10 |
| Re: Random function | Tom Lane | 18:33 |
| Re: Random function | David G. Johnston | 18:33 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 22:55 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 14:13 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Michael Lewis | 14:41 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Laurenz Albe | 14:46 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 14:55 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 14:56 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Rick Otten | 15:03 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Justin Pryzby | 15:09 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 15:15 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | daya airody | 15:24 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Laurenz Albe | 04:32 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 06:47 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 06:56 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 08:12 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 10:12 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 13:09 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 13:33 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 13:40 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Tom Lane | 16:02 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 16:18 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Tom Lane | 16:36 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 16:49 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Could someone please help us share the procedure to troubleshoot the locks on proc issues. | postgann2020 s | 05:11 |
| slow query | dangal | 16:03 |
| Re: slow query | Justin Pryzby | 16:07 |
| Re: slow query | dangal | 16:18 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 21:46 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good | Tejaswini GC | 06:27 |
| Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good | Julien Rouhaud | 07:06 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Arya F | 17:48 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Andreas Kretschmer | 18:41 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Tom Lane | 18:55 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Arya F | 19:50 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Neil | 20:48 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 14:19 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Justin Pryzby | 04:59 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Tom Lane | 05:09 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Laurenz Albe | 06:42 |
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 07:53 |
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 09:08 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Thomas Kellerer | 09:18 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Thomas Kellerer | 09:24 |
| Re: slow query | Michael Christofides | 10:20 |
| PostgreSQL DBA consulting | daya airody | 11:50 |
| Re: PostgreSQL DBA consulting | Justin Pryzby | 11:56 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 17:30 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| High kswapd | Don Seiler | 14:34 |
| Re: High kswapd | Justin Pryzby | 14:42 |
| Re: High kswapd | Don Seiler | 14:46 |
| Re: High kswapd | Justin Pryzby | 14:58 |
| Re: PostgreSQL DBA consulting | Amol Tarte | 15:04 |
| Re: High kswapd | Don Seiler | 15:08 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicate WHERE condition changes performance and plan | singh400@gmail.com | 19:55 |
| Using unlogged tables for web sessions | Stephen Carboni | 22:53 |
| Re: Duplicate WHERE condition changes performance and plan | David Rowley | 23:57 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 14:28 |
| Postgres not using index on views | David G. Johnston | 14:55 |
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 15:12 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Duplicate WHERE condition changes performance and plan | singh400@gmail.com | 00:50 |
| Re: Duplicate WHERE condition changes performance and plan | Justin Pryzby | 02:33 |
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 11:10 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Duplicate WHERE condition changes performance and plan | singh400@gmail.com | 16:33 |
| Re: PostgreSQL does not choose my indexes well | Jeff Janes | 18:26 |
| Re: PostgreSQL does not choose my indexes well | Stephen Frost | 18:33 |
| Re: PostgreSQL does not choose my indexes well | Tom Lane | 19:39 |
| The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. | Moises Lopez | 21:11 |
| Re: PostgreSQL does not choose my indexes well | Jeff Janes | 22:59 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: PostgreSQL does not choose my indexes well | Stephen Frost | 12:02 |
| Re: The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. | Tom Lane | 14:24 |
| Re: PostgreSQL does not choose my indexes well | Arcadio Ortega Reinoso | 19:47 |
| Re: The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. | Michael Lewis | 20:40 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Recursive query slow on strange conditions | Jean-Christophe Boggio | 17:49 |
| Re: Recursive query slow on strange conditions | Justin Pryzby | 18:10 |
| Re: Recursive query slow on strange conditions | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 19:37 |
| Re: Recursive query slow on strange conditions | Jean-Christophe Boggio | 20:22 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| NUMA settings | Marc Rechté | 06:54 |
| Re: NUMA settings | Laurenz Albe | 08:50 |
| Re: The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. 📎 | Moises Lopez | 19:21 |
| Re: The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. | Michael Lewis | 19:36 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. | Michael Lewis | 15:52 |
| Re: The query plan get all columns but I'm using only one column. | Moises Lopez | 16:26 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Best partition type for billions of addresses | Arya F | 13:20 |
| Re: Best partition type for billions of addresses | Justin Pryzby | 14:00 |
| Re: Best partition type for billions of addresses | Stephen Frost | 14:01 |
| Re: Best partition type for billions of addresses | Arya F | 14:33 |
| Re: Best partition type for billions of addresses | Stephen Frost | 14:39 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | James Thompson | 08:58 |
| Re: Duplicate WHERE condition changes performance and plan | singh400@gmail.com | 11:39 |
| Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | Justin Pryzby | 15:38 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: good book or any other resources for Postgresql | Bhupendra Babu | 03:37 |
| Re: NUMA settings | Marc Rechté | 05:56 |
| Re: NUMA settings | Laurenz Albe | 08:00 |
| Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | Laurenz Albe | 08:08 |
| Re: NUMA settings | Marc Rechté | 08:11 |
| Re: NUMA settings | Laurenz Albe | 08:25 |
| Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | Justin Pryzby | 19:28 |
| Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | James Thompson | 21:10 |
| Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | Justin Pryzby | 21:35 |
| Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m | Tom Lane | 21:42 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: 600 million rows of data. Bad hardware or need partitioning? | Arya F | 00:15 |
| Re: 600 million rows of data. Bad hardware or need partitioning? | Arya F | 00:31 |
| Re: 600 million rows of data. Bad hardware or need partitioning? | Justin Pryzby | 01:37 |
| Inaccurate Rows estimate for "Bitmap And" causes Planner to choose wrong join | Steve Pritchard | 16:19 |
| Re: Inaccurate Rows estimate for "Bitmap And" causes Planner to choose wrong join | Justin Pryzby | 16:34 |
| Re: Inaccurate Rows estimate for "Bitmap And" causes Planner to choose wrong join | Jeff Janes | 18:24 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | Amarendra Konda | 11:19 |
| Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | Adrian Klaver | 14:40 |
| Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | David G. Johnston | 15:46 |
| pg_attribute, pg_class, pg_depend grow huge in count and size with multiple tenants. | samhitha g | 17:10 |
| Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | Amarendra Konda | 17:36 |
| Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | Amarendra Konda | 17:49 |
| Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | Amarendra Konda | 18:07 |
| AutoVacuum and growing transaction XID's | github kran | 18:23 |
| Re: AutoVacuum and growing transaction XID's | Michael Lewis | 18:32 |
| Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) | Amarendra Konda | 18:51 |