Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

2012 Resources

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Contents

RESOURCES
Self-Assessment Professional Growth and Improvement Plans Pre- and Post- Conference Sample Questions Performance Rubric: Record of Evidence Conducting a Walkthrough / Informal Observation Post Conference Planning

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Self-Assessment
Name Date
Areas for Growth Priorities (Check 2)

Self-Assessment Summary Tool

Directions: Teachers should record evidence to indicate strengths and areas for growth for each standard. Then, look across all of the standards holistically and identify two priorities for the upcoming year. Note these two priorities with check marks in the far-right column.
Standard Knowledge of how students learn and of student development Understanding of what students know and are able to do High expectations for all students Respect for all students Identification, instruction and intervention for special populations Knowledge of content Use of content- specific instructional strategies to teach concepts and skills Knowledge of school and district curriculum priorities and Ohio academic content standards Relationship of knowledge within the discipline to other content areas Connection of content to life experiences and career opportunities Knowledge of assessment types Use of varied diagnostic, formative and summative assessments Analysis of data to monitor student progress and to plan, differentiate, and modify instruction Communication of results Inclusion of student self-assessment and goal-setting Alignment to school and district priorities and Ohio academic content standards Use of student information to plan and deliver instruction Communication of clear learning goals Application of knowledge of how students learn to instructional design and delivery Differentiation of instruction to support learning needs of all students Use of activities to promote independence and problem-solving Use of varied resources to support learner needs Fair and equitable treatment of all students Creation of a safe learning environment Use of strategies to motivate students to work productively and assume responsibility for learning Creation of learning situations for independent and collaborative work Maintenance an environment that is conducive to learning for all students Clear and effective communication Shared responsibility with parents/caregivers to support student learning Collaboration with other teachers, administrators, school and district staff Collaboration with local community agencies Strengths Standard 1: Students Standard 6: Collaboration & Communication Standard 5: Learning Environment Standard 4: Instruction Standard 3: Assessment Standard 2: Content

5/18/12

Standard 7: Professional Responsibility and Growth

Understanding of and adherence to professional ethics, policies and legal codes Engagement in continuous, purposeful professional development Desire to serve as an agent of change, seeking positive impact on teaching quality and student achievement

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Professional Growth Plan

Professional Growth Plan

As a result of the evaluation process, teachers and evaluators should focus on accelerating and continuing teacher growth through professional development. Professional development should be individualized to the needs of the teacher, and specifically relate to his/her areas of refinement as identified in the teachers evaluation. The evaluator should recommend professional development opportunities, and support the teacher by providing resources (e.g., time, financial).

Self-Directed

Collaborative

Teacher

Evaluator Date Record dates when discussed Areas for Professional Growth supports needed, resources, professional development Comments during conference with teacher and evaluator are made appropriate to the needs of the teacher.

Annual Focus These are addressed by the evaluator as appropriate for this teacher.

Goal 1: Student Achievement/Outcomes for Students Goal Statement: Evidence Indicators:

Goal 2 : Teacher Performance on the Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession Goal Statement: Evidence Indicators:

Evaluator Signature

Date

Teacher Signature

Date

The signatures above verify that the teacher and evaluator have discussed and agreed upon this Professional Growth Plan.

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Improvement Plan

Improvement Plan
Teacher Name: School year: Building: Grade Level/ Subject: Date of Improvement Plan Conference:

Written improvement plans are to be developed in the circumstances when an educator makes below expected academic growth with his/ her students AND/OR receives an overall ineffective rating or an ineffective rating on any of the components of the OTES system. The purpose of the improvement plan is to identify specific deficiencies in performance and foster growth through professional development and targeted support. If corrective actions are not made within the time as specified in the improvement plan, a recommendation may be made for dismissal or to continue on the plan. Section 1: Improvement Statement - List specific areas for improvement as related to the Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession. Attach documentation. Performance Standard(s) Addressed in this Plan Date(s) Improvement Area or Concern Observed Specific Statement of the Concern: Areas of Improvement

Section 2: Desired Level of Performance List specific measurable goals to improve performance. Indicate what will be measured for each goal. Beginning Date Ending Date Level of Performance Specifically Describe Successful Improvement Target(s)

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Improvement Plan

Improvement Plan (continued)

Section 3: Specific Plan of Action Describe in detail specific plans of action that must be taken by the teacher to improve his/her performance. Indicate the sources of evidence that will be used to document the completion of the improvement plan. Actions to be Taken Sources of Evidence that Will Be Examined

Section 4: Assistance and Professional Development Describe in detail specific supports that will be provided as well as opportunities for professional development.

Date for this Improvement Plan to Be Evaluated: Teachers Signature: Evaluators Signature: Date: Date:

The evaluators signature on this form verifies that the proper procedures as detailed in the local contract have been followed.

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Improvement Plan

Improvement Plan: Evaluation of Plan

Teacher Name: School year: Building: Grade Level/ Subject: Date of Evaluation:

The improvement plan will be evaluated at the end of the time specified in the plan. Outcomes from the improvement plan demonstrate the following action to be taken; Improvement is demonstrated and performance standards are met to a satisfactory level of performance* The Improvement Plan should continue for time specified: Dismissal is recommended.

Comments: Provide justification for recommendation indicated above and attach evidence to support recommended course of action.

I have reviewed this evaluation and discussed it with my evaluator. My signature indicates that I have been advised of my performance status; it does not necessarily imply that I agree with this evaluation. Teachers Signature: Evaluators Signature: Date: Date:

The evaluators signature on this form verifies that the proper procedures as detailed in the local contract have been follow ed.

*The acceptable level of performance varies depending on the teachers years of experience. Teachers in resi dencyspecifically in Years 1 through 4are expected to perform at the Developing level or above. Experienced teacherswith five or more years of experienceare expected to meet the Proficient level or above.

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Pre- and Post- Conference Questions

Pre-Observation Planning and Lesson Reflection Resource Questions

The questions provided are intended to guide thinking and conversation; every question may not be answered or relevant for every observation. INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING FOCUS (Standard 4: Instruction) What is the focus for the lesson? What content will students know/understand? What skills will they demonstrate? What standards are addressed in the planned instruction? Why is this learning important? ASSESSMENT DATA (Standard 3: Assessment) What assessment data was examined to inform this lesson planning? What does pre-assessment data indicate about student learning needs? PRIOR CONTENT KNOWLEDGE/ SEQUENCE/CONNECTIONS (Standard 1: Students / Standard 2: Content / Standard 4: Instruction) What prior knowledge do students need? What are the connections to previous and future learning? How does this lesson connect to students real-life experiences and/or possible careers? How does it connect to other disciplines? KNOWLEDGE OF STUDENTS (Standard 1: Students) What should the evaluator know about the student population? (See Data Measures Inventory for the Classroom) How is this a developmentally appropriate learning activity? RESOURCES (Standard 2: Content / Standard 4: Instruction) What resources/materials will be used in instruction? How will technology be integrated into lesson delivery? CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT (Standard 1: Students / Standard 5: Learning Environment) How will the environment support all students? How will different grouping strategies be used? How will safety in the classroom be ensured? How will respect for all be modeled and taught? ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING (Standard 3: Assessment) How will you check for understanding during the lesson? What specific products or demonstrations will assess student learning / achievement of goals for instruction? How will you ensure that students understand how they are doing and support students self-assessment? How will you use assessment data to inform your next steps?

INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT LESSON DELIVERY (Standard 2: Content / Standard 4: Instruction) How will the goals for learning be communicated to students? What instructional strategies and methods will be used to engage students and promote independent learning and problem solving? What strategies will be used to make sure all students achieve lesson goals? How will content-specific concepts, assumptions, and skills be taught? DIFFERENTIATION (Standard 1: Students / Standard 4: Instruction) How will the instructional strategies address all students learning needs? How will the lesson engage and challenge students of all levels? How will developmental gaps be addressed?

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES COLLABORATION AND COMMUNICATION (Standard 6) How do you cooperate with colleagues? How do you work with others when there is a problem? What is your communication style with students? With families? With colleagues? In what ways do you seek the perspectives of others? Give an example. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GROWTH (Standard 7) How do you apply knowledge gained from other experiences into your teaching? Discuss ways you reflect and analyze your teaching. What are some proactive ways you further your own professional growth?

5/18/12

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Assessment of Teacher Performance

Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric

The Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric is intended to be scored holistically. This means that evaluators will assess which level provides the best overall description of the teacher. The scoring process is expected to occur upon completion of each thirty (30) minute observation and post-conference. The evaluator is to consider evidence gathered during the pre-observation conference, the observation, the post-observation conference, and classroom walkthroughs (if applicable). When completing the performance rubric, please note that evaluators are not expected to gather evidence on all indicators for each observation cycle. Likewise, teachers should not be required to submit additional pieces of evidence to address all indicators. The professionalism section of the rubric may use evidence collected during the pre-observation and post-observation conferences as well as information from the Professional Growth and/or Improvement Plan (if applicable).

INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING Ineffective FOCUS FOR LEARNING (Standard 4: Instruction) INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference
The teacher does not demonstrate a clear focus for student learning. Learning objectives are too general to guide lesson planning and are inappropriate for the students, and/or do not reference the Ohio standards.

Developing
The teacher communicates a focus for student learning, develops learning objectives that are appropriate for students and reference the Ohio standards but do not include measureble goals.

Proficient
The teacher demonstrates a focus for student learning, with appropriate learning objectives that include measurable goal(s) for student learning aligned with the Ohio standards. The teacher demonstrates the importance of the goal and its appropriateness for students.

Accomplished
The teacher establishes challenging and measurable goal(s) for student learning that aligns with the Ohio standards and reflect a range of student learner needs. The teacher demonstrates how the goal(s) fit into the broader unit, course, and school goals for content learning and skills.

Evidence

The teacher does not plan for the assessment of student learning or does not analyze student learning data to inform lesson plans.

ASSESSMENT DATA (Standard 3: Assessment) Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference

The teacher does not use or only uses one measure of student performance.

The teacher explains the characteristics, uses, and limitations of various diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments but does not consistently incorporate this knowledge into lesson planning.

The teacher demonstrates an understanding that assessment is a means of evaluating and supporting student learning through effectively incorporating diagnostic, formative, and/or summative assessments into lesson planning.

The teacher purposefully plans assessments and differentiates assessment choices to match the full range of student needs, abilities, and learning styles, incorporating a range of appropriate diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments into lesson plans. Student learning needs are accurately identified through an analysis of student data; the teacher uses assessment data to identify student strengths and areas for student growth.

The teacher uses more than one measure of student performance but does not appropriately vary assessment approaches, or the teacher may have difficulty analyzing data to effectively inform instructional planning and delivery.

The teacher employs a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques to collect evidence of students knowledge and skills and analyzes data to effectively inform instructional planning and delivery.

Evidence

5/18/12

INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING Ineffective

The teachers lesson does not build on or connect to students prior knowledge, or the teacher may give an explanation that is illogical or inaccurate as to how the content connects to previous and future learning.

Developing
The teacher makes an attempt to connect the lesson to students prior knowledge, to previous lessons or future learning but is not completely successful.

Proficient
The teacher makes clear and coherent connections with students prior knowledge and future learningboth explicitly to students and within the lesson.

Accomplished
The teacher uses the input and contributions of families, colleagues, and other professionals in understanding each learners prior knowledge and supporting their development. The teacher makes meaningful and relevant connections between lesson content and other disciplines and real-world experiences and careers as well as prepares opportunities for students to apply learning from different content areas to solve problems. The teacher plans and sequences instruction that reflects an understanding of the prerequisite relationships among the important content, concepts, and processes in school and district curriculum priorities and in state standards as well as multiple pathways for learning depending on student needs. The teacher accurately explains how the lesson fits within the structure of the discipline.

INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING

PRIOR CONTENT KNOWLEDGE / SEQUENCE / CONNECTIONS (Standard 1: Students; Standard 2: Content; Standard 4: Instruction) Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference

The teacher plans and sequences instruction to include the important content, concepts, and processes in school and district curriculum priorities and in state standards.

Evidence

5/18/12

10

INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING
The teacher demonstrates a lack of familiarity with students backgrounds and has made no attempts to find this information. The teacher demonstrates some familiarity with students background knowledge and experiences and describes one procedure used to obtain this information. The teacher demonstrates familiarity with students background knowledge and experiences and describes multiple procedures used to obtain this information. The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the purpose and value of learning about students background experiences, demonstrates familiarity with each students background knowledge and experiences, and describes multiple procedures used to obtain this information. The teachers analysis of student data (student development, student learning and preferred learning styles, and student backgrounds/prior experiences) accurately connects the data to specific instructional strategies and plans. The teacher plans for and can articulate specific strategies, content, and delivery that will meet the needs of individual students and groups of students.

KNOWLEDGE OF STUDENTS (Standard 1: Students) INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING Sources of Evidence: Analysis of Student Data Pre-Conference

The teachers plan for instruction does not demonstrate an understanding of students development, preferred learning styles, and/or student backgrounds/prior experiences.

The teachers instructional plan draws upon a partial analysis of students development, readiness for learning, preferred learning styles, or backgrounds and prior experiences and/or the plan is inappropriately tailored to the specific population of students in the classroom.

The teachers instructional plan draws upon an accurate analysis of the students development, readiness for learning, preferred learning styles, and backgrounds and prior experiences.

Evidence

5/18/12

11

Instruction and Assessment Ineffective

A teachers explanations are unclear, incoherent, or inaccurate, and are generally ineffective in building student understanding. The teacher uses language that fails to engage students, is inappropriate to the content, and/or discourages independent or creative thinking. The teacher fails to address student confusion or frustration and does not use effective questioning techniques during the lesson. The lesson is almost entirely teacher-directed.

Developing
Teacher explanations are accurate and generally clear but the teacher may not fully clarify information based on students questions about content or instructions for learning activities or the teacher may use some language that is developmentally inappropriate, leading to confusion or limiting discussion. The teacher re-explains topics when students show confusion, but is not always able to provide an effective alternative explanation. The teacher attempts to employ purposeful questioning techniques, but may confuse students with the phrasing or timing of questions. The lesson is primarily teacher-directed.

Proficient
Teacher explanations are clear and accurate. The teacher uses developmentally appropriate strategies and language designed to actively encourage independent, creative, and critical thinking.

Accomplished
Teacher explanations are clear, coherent, and precise. The teacher uses well-timed, individualized, developmentally appropriate strategies and language designed to actively encourage independent, creative, and critical thinking, including the appropriate use of questions and discussion techniques. The teacher accurately anticipates confusion by presenting information in multiple formats and clarifying content before students ask questions. The teacher develops high-level understanding through effective uses of varied levels of questions. The lesson is student-led, with the teacher in the role of facilitator.

LESSON DELIVERY (Standard 2: Content; Standard 4: Instruction; Standard 6: Collaboration and Communication)

Sources of Evidence: Formal Observation Classroom Walkthroughs/ Informal Observations

The teacher effectively addresses confusion by re-explaining topics when asked and ensuring understanding. The teacher employs effective, purposeful questioning techniques during instruction. The lesson is a balance of teacher-directed instruction and student-led learning.

INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

Evidence

DIFFERENTIATION (Standard 1: Students; Standard 4: Instruction) Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference Formal Observation Classroom Walkthroughs/ Informal Observations

The teacher does not attempt to make the lesson accessible and challenging for most students, or attempts are developmentally inappropriate.

The teacher relies on a single strategy or alternate set of materials to make the lesson accessible to most students though some students may not be able to access certain parts of the lesson and/or some may not be challenged.

The teacher supports the learning needs of students through a variety of strategies, materials, and/or pacing that make learning accessible and challenging for the group..

The teacher matches strategies, materials, and/or pacing to students individual needs, to make learning accessible and challenging for all students in the classroom . The teacher effectively uses independent, collaborative and wholeclass instruction to support individual learning goals and provides varied options for how students will demonstrate mastery.

Evidence

5/18/12

12

Instruction and Assessment Ineffective RESOURCES (Standard 2: Content; Standard 4: Instruction) Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference Formal Observation Classroom Walkthroughs/ Informal Observations
Instructional materials and resources used for instruction are not relevant to the lesson or are inappropriate for students.

Developing
The teacher uses appropriate instructional materials to support learning goals, but may not meet individual students learning styles/needs or actively engage them in learning.

Proficient
Instructional materials and resources are aligned to the instructional purposes and are appropriate for students learning styles and needs, actively engaging students.

Accomplished
Instructional materials and resources are aligned to instructional purposes, are varied and appropriate to ability levels of students, and actively engage them in ownership of their learning.

Evidence

5/18/12

13

Instruction and Assessment Ineffective

There is little or no evidence of a positive rapport between the teacher and students. For example, the teacher may respond disrespectfully to students or ignore their questions or comments.

Developing
The teacher is fair in the treatment of students and establishes a basic rapport with them. For example, the teacher addresses students questions or comments but does not inquire about their overall well-being.

Proficient
The teacher has positive rapport with students and demonstrates respect for and interest in all students. For example, the teacher makes eye contact and connects with individual students.

Accomplished
The teacher has positive rapport with students and demonstrates respect for and interest in individual students experiences, thoughts and opinions. For example, the teacher responds quietly, individually, and sensitively to student confusion or distress. Routines are well-established and orderly and students initiate responsibility for the efficient operation of the classroom.

There are no evident routines or procedures; students seem unclear about what they should be doing or are idle.

INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT (Standard 1: Students; Standard 5: Learning Environment; Standard 6: Collaboration and Communication) Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference Formal Observation Classroom Walkthroughs/ Informal Observations

Routines and procedures are in place, but the teacher may inappropriately prompt or direct students when they are unclear or idle.

Routines and procedures run smoothly throughout the lesson, and students assume age-appropriate levels of responsibility for the efficient operation of the classroom. Transitions are efficient and occur smoothly. There is evidence of varied learning situations (whole class, cooperative learning, small group and independent work). The teacher engages in two-way communication and offers a variety of volunteer opportunities and activities for families to support student learning.

Transitions are inefficient with considerable instructional time lost. Lessons progress too slowly or quickly so students are frequently disengaged.

The teacher transitions between learning activities, but occasionally loses some instructional time in the process.

Transitions are seamless as the teacher effectively maximizes instructional time and combines independent, collaborative, and whole-class learning situations.

The teacher creates a learning environment that allows for little or no communication or engagement with families.

The teacher welcomes communication from families and replies in a timely manner.

The teacher engages in two-way, ongoing communication with families that results in active volunteer, community, and family partnerships which contribute to student learning and development. A classroom management system has been designed, implemented, and adjusted with student input and is appropriate for the classroom and individual student needs. Students are actively encouraged to take responsibility for their behavior. The teacher uses research-based strategies to lessen disruptive behaviors and reinforce positive behaviors.

Expectations for behavior are not established or are inappropriate and/or no monitoring of behaviors occurs. The teacher responds to misbehavior inappropriately.

Appropriate expectations for behavior are established, but some expectations are unclear or do not address the needs of individual students. The teacher inconsistently monitors behavior.

A classroom management system has been implemented that is appropriate and responsive to classroom and individual needs of students. Clear expectations for student behavior are evident . Monitoring of student behavior is consistent, appropriate, and effective.

Evidence

Instruction and Assessment Ineffective The teacher does not routinely use ASSESSMENT OF assessments to measure student mastery. STUDENT LEARNING (Standard 3: Assessment) Sources of Evidence: Pre-Conference Formal Observation Developing
The teacher uses assessments to measure student mastery, but may not differentiate instruction based on this information.

Proficient
The teacher uses assessment data to identify students strengths and needs, and modifies and differentiates instruction accordingly, although the teacher may not be able to anticipate learning obstacles.

Accomplished
The teacher uses assessment data to identify students strengths and needs, and modifies and differentiates instruction accordingly, as well as examines classroom assessment results to reveal trends and patterns in individual and group progress and to anticipate learning obstacles.

INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

5/18/12

14

Instruction and Assessment Ineffective Classroom Walkthroughs/ The teacher rarely or never checks the students understanding of content. The Informal Observations teacher fails to make adjustments in Post-Conference
response to student confusion.

Developing
The teacher checks for student understanding and makes attempts to adjust instruction accordingly, but these adjustments may cause some additional confusion

Proficient
The teacher checks for understanding at key moments and makes adjustments to instruction (whole-class or individual students).The teacher responds to student misunderstandings by providing additional clarification.

Accomplished
The teacher continually checks for understanding and makes adjustments accordingly (whole-class or individual students). When an explanation is not effectively leading students to understand the content, the teacher adjusts quickly and seamlessly within the lesson and uses an alternative way to explain the concept. By using student data from a variety of sources, the teacher appropriately adapts instructional methods and materials and paces learning activities to meet the needs of individual students as well as the whole class. The teacher provides substantive, specific, and timely feedback to students, families, and other school personnel while maintaining confidentiality. The teacher provides the opportunity for students to engage in self-assessment and show awareness of their own strengths and weaknesses. The teacher uses student assessment results to reflect on his or her own teaching and to monitor teaching strategies and behaviors in relation to student success.

The teacher persists in using a particular strategy for responding to misunderstandings, even when data suggest the approach is not succeeding.

The teacher gathers and uses student data from a few sources to choose appropriate instructional strategies for groups of students.

The teacher gathers and uses student data from a variety of sources to choose and implement appropriate instructional strategies for groups of students.

The teacher does not provide students with feedback about their learning.

Students receive occasional or limited feedback about their performance from the teacher.

The teacher provides substantive, specific, and timely feedback of student progress to students, families, and other school personnel while maintaining confidentiality.

Evidence

5/18/12

15

Professionalism Ineffective The teacher fails to communicate clearly PROFESSIONAL with students and families or collaborate RESPONSIBILITIES effectively with professional colleagues. (Standard 6: Collaboration and Communication; Standard 7: Professional Responsibility and Growth) PROFESSIONALISM Sources of Evidence: Professional Development Plan or Improvement Plan; Pre-conference; Post-conference; daily interaction with others
The teacher fails to understand and follow regulations, policies, and agreements.

Developing
The teacher uses a variety of strategies to communicate with students and families and collaborate with colleagues, but these approaches may not always be appropriate for a particular situation or achieve the intended outcome.

Proficient
The teacher uses effective communication strategies with students and families and works effectively with colleagues to examine problems of practice, analyze student work, and identify targeted strategies.

Accomplished
The teacher communicates effectively with students, families, and colleagues. The teacher collaborates with colleagues to improve personal and team practices by facilitating professional dialogue, peer observation and feedback, peer coaching and other collegial learning activities. The teacher meets ethical and professional responsibilities and helps colleagues access and interpret laws and policies and understand their implications in the classroom. The teacher sets and regularly modifies short-and long-term professional goals based on self-assessment and analysis of student learning evidence.

The teacher understands and follows district policies and state and federal regulations at a minimal level.

The teacher meets ethical and professional responsibilities with integrity and honesty. The teacher models and upholds district policies and state and federal regulations. The teacher sets data-based short- and long-term professional goals and takes action to meet these goals.

The teacher fails to demonstrate evidence of an ability to accurately self-assess performance and to appropriately identify areas for professional development.

The teacher identifies strengths and areas for growth to develop and implement targeted goals for professional growth.

Evidence

5/18/12

16

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Classroom Walkthroughs and Informal Observations

Classroom Walkthroughs / Informal Observation

An informal observation/ classroom walkthrough is a: Tool to inform evaluation that provides the opportunity to gather evidence of instruction over a series of short classroom visits; Process for giving targeted evidenced-based feedback to teachers; and Means for principals to visit classrooms more frequently and more purposefully. An informal observation/ classroom walkthrough is not a(n): Formal observation; Gotcha opportunity for supervisors or evaluators; Isolated event; or Shortcut to the observation protocol required as part of the teacher evaluation process. Classroom walkthroughs/ Informal observations, as part of the teacher evaluation system, may be general in nature or focused on observing a specific aspect of teacher performance. Summary data collected through a series of walkthroughs along with evidence documented through formal observations will come together to inform the teachers summative performance rating: ineffective, developing, proficient or accomplished .

Guidelines for Informal Classroom Observations

Informally Observe All Teachers All teachers benefit from informal classroom observations. Informal observations should last from 15 to20 minutes; therefore, conduct only as many observations in a day as you can follow up with on either the same or next day. Teachers need and deserve some type of immediate feedback. Informally Observe As Often As You Can The principals presence in the classroom sends a positive message to teachers: the principal cares. Including informal classroom observation as a schoolwide initiative requires consistency and frequency. Find times in the day to observe teachers at varying times of the day: for most teachers, what occurs in the morning is much different than what occurs in the afternoon. Focusing on One or Two Areas Although there may be no predetermined focus established (because of no pre-conference), find a focus based on the instruction, events or discussions that are occurring in the classroom. A focus may also occur based upon past conferences and the need for follow up observations.

5/18/12

17

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Classroom Walkthroughs and Informal Observations

Make Time to Follow Up Follow-up communication to informal classroom observations is a critical component. Follow-up will often be in writing but the evaluator should extend to the teacher an invitation to discuss any comments provided face-to-face. The evaluator may also offer resources to help teachers refine their practice. Teacher Driven Observations While it is recognized that evaluators have many demands on their time, encouraging teachers to identify instructional periods for the evaluator to observe can be a means for the evaluator to collect evidence related to a specific focus the teacher and evaluator may be working on. Types of Data Data collected as evidence of teacher practice may be quantitative, qualitative, or a combination of both. Quantitative data includes frequencies, distributions and other counts or tallies. For example the observer could use a checklist to tally how many questions were asked of children in the front row or children who had their hands raised versus not. The evaluator might also chart the types of questions asked (higher versus lower levels). Qualitative data can include scripted notes detailing patterns of activities, vocabulary used, and events observed. In both cases accuracy is essential to ensure the credibility of the process and the evaluator.

5/18/12

18

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Classroom Walkthroughs and Informal Observations

Informal Observation: General Form

Teacher Name: Evaluator Name: Grade(s)/Subject Area(s): Time Walkthrough Begins: Date: Time Walkthrough Ends:

Directions: This form serves as a record of an informal walkthrough by the teachers evaluator. The evaluator will likely not observe all the teaching elements listed below in any one informal observation. This record, along with records of additional informal observations, will be used to inform the summative evaluation of the teacher.

Instruction is developmentally appropriate

EVALUATOR OBSERVATIONS Lesson content is linked to previous and future learning Classroom learning environment is safe and conducive to learning Teacher provides students with timely and responsive feedback Instructional time is used effectively Routines support learning goals and activities Multiple methods of assessment of student learning are utilized to guide instruction Other:

Learning outcomes and goals are clearly communicated to students Varied instructional tools and strategies reflect student needs and learning objectives Content presented is accurate and grade appropriate Teacher connects lesson to real-life applications Instruction and lesson activities are accessible and challenging for students Other: Evaluator Summary Comments:

Recommendations for Focus of Informal Observations:

Evaluator Signature:

Photocopy to Teacher

5/18/12

19

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Classroom Walkthroughs and Informal Observations

Informal Observation: Open-Ended Form

Teacher Name: Evaluator Name: TIMES Grade(s)/Subject Area(s): Time Walkthrough Begins: Date: Time Walkthrough Ends: OBSERVATIONS

Evaluator Summary Comments:

Evaluator Signature:

Photocopy to Teacher

5/18/12

20

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Planning for the Post-Observation Conference

Post Conference Planning

The goal for the conference leader is to cognitively coach the teacher through the use of reflective questions. Record 3 reflective questions you would ask the teacher aligned to the area of reinforcement. 1. 2. 3. Record 3 reflective questions you would ask the teacher aligned to the area of refinement. 1. 2. 3.

Four Key Elements of the Instructional Post-Conference

Conducting the Post-Conference: To be discussed at Day 3 Training prior to conducting the post-conference 1. Introduction/Greeting/Establish Length Review Conference Process General Impression Question - How do you think the lesson went? 2. Reinforcing the Teacher Identify an area of Reinforcement (ONLY one area) Ask Self-Analysis Question Provide evidence from notes Refining the Teachers Skill: Identify an area of Refinement (ONLY one area) Ask Self-Analysis Question Provide evidence from notes Give a recommendation for future practice Present evidence and rating connected to the rubric

3.

4.

5/18/12

21

Ohio Teacher Evaluation System

Final Summative Rating

Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness

Proficiency on Standards 50% Cumulative Performance Rating (Holistic Rating using Performance Rubric) Areas of reinforcement/ refinement: Student Growth Data 50% Student Growth Measure of Effectiveness Areas of reinforcement/ refinement: BELOW EXPECTED GROWTH EXPECTED GROWTH ABOVE EXPECTED
GROWTH

INEFFECTIVE

DEVELOPING

PROFICIENT

ACCOMPLISHED

Final Summative (Overall) Rating

INEFFECTIVE

DEVELOPING

PROFICIENT

ACCOMPLISHED

Check here if Improvement Plan has been recommended. Teacher Signature Evaluator Signature Date Date

The signatures above indicate that the teacher and evaluator have discussed the Summative Rating. Note: The teacher may provide additional information to the evaluator within 10 working days of the receipt of this form, and may request a second conference with the evaluator. Any additional information will become part of the summative record. Challenges may be made according to the local contract agreement.

5/18/12

22