0% found this document useful (0 votes)
232 views2 pages

Denial of Counsel Appointment in Laverdure Case

ORDER DENYING 2 Application for Appointment of Counsel filed by Randle Laverdure Signed by Honorable Robert H Cleland. (LWag) 2:2007cv11055 Michigan Eastern District Court

Uploaded by

Justia.com
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
232 views2 pages

Denial of Counsel Appointment in Laverdure Case

ORDER DENYING 2 Application for Appointment of Counsel filed by Randle Laverdure Signed by Honorable Robert H Cleland. (LWag) 2:2007cv11055 Michigan Eastern District Court

Uploaded by

Justia.com
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Laverdure v. Booker Doc.

4
Case 2:07-cv-11055-RHC-SDP Document 4 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

RANDLE LAVERDURE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 2:07-CV-11055

RAYMOND BOOKER,

Respondent.
________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’ S APPLICATION


FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s “Application for Appointment of

Counsel . . . .” Petitioner has filed a financial affidavit in support of his request indicating

that he is unable to afford counsel. Petitioner has submitted his habeas petition, but

Respondent has not yet filed an answer to the petition.

Petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas

corpus review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492

(6th Cir. 1995); see also Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992) (citing Pennsylvania

v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)). “‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a

matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.’” Childs v.

Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Madden, 352

F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)). Petitioner has submitted his pleadings in support of his

claims. Neither an evidentiary hearing nor discovery are necessary at this time, and the

interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. §

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-11055-RHC-SDP Document 4 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 2

3006A(a)(2)(B); 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, Rules 6(a) and 8(c). Accordingly,

Petitioner’s “Application for Appointment of Counsel . . . .” [Dkt # 2] is DENIED.

S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 28, 2007

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, March 28, 2007, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\07-11055.LAVERDURE.DenyCounselRequest.CB.wpd

You might also like