SAMPLE CALCULATION
Power emitted = QHHCpH(THin- THout)
= (3.33x10-5)(985.118)(4.179)(6)
= 0.822538=822.5W
Power absorbed = QCCCpC(TCout TCin)
= (2.5x10-5)(4.174)(994.766)(10.2)
= 1.058799 = 1058.799W
Power lost = power emitted power absorbed
= 822.5-1058.799
= -236.261W
Efficiency =
x 100%
100% = 99.283%
Log mean temperature difference tm =
) (
(
(
)
)
)
= 27.6142s
Overall heat transfer coefficient U =
=
= 598.1678
where,
area = Surface area of contact
= x ODinner pipe x Length
= (3.142 x 0.015 x 1.36) m
= 0.0641 m
Reynolds number, Re =
Nusselt number = 0.023 (Re0.8) (Pr0.33)
Prandtl number, Pr =
Surface heat transfer coefficient, h = Nu
Theoretical Heat Coefficient,
[cold side] +
Where,
= density,
= dynamic viscosity,
cp=specific heat,
k= thermal conductivity
d=diameter of pipe
Percentage error =
For hot water:
Water at 60 : Density, = 983.2kg/m3
Dynamic viscosity, = 0.467x10-3N.s/m2
Specific heat, cp= 4185J/kgK
Thermal conductivity, k=0.65W/mK
Flow rate, Q= 3.33 x 10-5 m3 /s
A=
= 0.000127 m2
[hot side]
By continuity equation, Q=Av
V=
=
= 0.2622 m/s
Reynolds number, Re =
)(
= 7176 > 4000 (turbulent flow)
Prandtl number, Pr =
=3
By turbulent flow, Nusselt number, Nu = 0.023(Re0.8)(Pr0.33)
Nusselt number, Nu = 0.023(71760.8)(30.33)
= 40.1683
Surface heat transfer coefficient, h =
= 2008.415W/m
For cold water:
Water at 30 :
Density,
= 995.65kg/m
Dynamic viscosity, = 0.798x10-3 N.s/m
Specific heat, cp
= 4179J/kg.K
Thermal conductivity, k= 0.62W/m.K
Flow rate, Q= 2.50x 10-5 m/s
Cross Sectional Diameter,de=ID for outer pipe(cold water) OD for inner pipe(hotwater)
=Di - do
= 20mm 15mm
= 5mm
= 0.005m
Cross Sectional Area, A
((
((
))
))
= 1.37x 10-4 m2
By continuity equation, Q=Av
V=
=
= 0.1825m/s
Reynolds number, Re =
)(
= 1138.51 < 4000 (laminar flow)
For the laminar flow, Nusselt number for concentric tube heat exchanger can be found
from table 11.3 pg. 638, Heat & Mass Transfer (Fundamentals & Applications),
McGrawHill 4th Edition,
=
= 0.75
extrapolated and found Nu = 5.3
Surface heat transfer coefficient, h =
= 657.2 W/mK
Theoritical U, U =
= 495.1692 W/m2.K
=
(
Experimental U = 644.9115W/mK
Percentage error =
=
= -30.24%
x 100%
x 100%