SAMPLE SBM VALIDATION FORM Name of School: STEP 1: Determine the Performance Improvement (60%) Thematic Area Access
45% Performance Indicators Enrollment Increase % of Inc SY 2009-10: 6061 SY 2010-11: 5007 -1054 SY 2011-12: 4609 -398 Ave. % of Increase -15.75 Dropout Rate (DR) % of Dec SY 2009-10: 4.89 SY 2010-11: 9.11 4.22 SY 2011-12: 6.51 -2.6 Ave. % of Decrease 12.44 Completion Rate (CR) % of Inc SY 2009-10: 87.75 SY 2010-11: 77.71 -10.04 SY 2011-12: 93.88 16.17 Ave. % of Increase 3.26 Cohort-Survival Rate (CSR) % of Inc SY 2009-10: 91.24 SY 2010-11: 80.85 -10.39 SY 2011-12: 82.00 1.15 Ave. % of Increase -5.63 Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR): 10.07 NAT MPS % of Inc SY 2009-10: 37.39 SY 2010-11: 40.79 3.4 SY 2011-12: 40.50 -0.29 Ave. % of Increase 3.84 Good Better Best Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 - 1.49 1.50 - 2.49 2.50 - 3.00 Description Good Better Best Rating & Equivalent Points 1 - Marginal: At leat 1% increase 2 - Average: At least 7% increase 3 - High: At least 10% increase Baseline: 7.06 1 - Marginal: At least 25% decrease 2 - Average: At least 50% decrease 3 - High: Has 0 DR Baseline: 75% 1 - Marginal: At leat 5% increase 2 - Average: At least 7% increase 3 - High: At least 10% increase Baseline: 76% 1 - Marginal: At leat 5% increase 2 - Average: At least 7% increase 3 - High: At least 10% increase
Efficiency 25%
Quality 30%
1 - Marginal: 26 - 50 % 2 - Average: 51 - 71 % 3 - High: 76 - 100 %
INTERPRETATION
Legend:
STEP 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%) Commulative Scores of Validators per Principle Computation
SBM Principle
WEIGHT
Leadership Curriculum & Learning Accountability Resource Mangement Subtotal INTERPRETATION
7/5 = 1.4 16/10 = 1.6 9/5 = 1.8 10/5 = 2
1.4 x 0.3 1.6 x 0.3 1.8 x 0.25 2 x 0.15
Good Better Best Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 - 1.49 1.50 - 2.49 2.50 - 3.00 Description Good Better Best
Legend:
Step 3: Compute for the Final Rating AREAS A. Performance Improvement B. SBM Assessment Score (D-O-D) TOTAL INTERPRETATION
Weight 60% 40% 100% Developing (Level I) Maturing(Level II) Advanced (Level III)
Computation 0 x 0.60 1.65 x 0.40
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 - 1.49 1.50 - 2.49 2.50 - 3.00
Description Developing Maturing Advanced
COMPUTATION
RESULTS
_____ x 0.45
_____ x 0.25
_____ x 0.30
Results
0.42 0.48 0.45 0.3 1.65
Results 0 0.66 0.66
Aspects of the Training
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Session 1 - Introduction to Access and Revised Framework Session 2 - The Revised SBM-PASBE Framework Session 3 - Revised Assessment Session 4 - The SBM Assessment and Validation Process Session 5 - DOD Validating System and Process Session 6 - Monitoring and Evaluation Session 7 - PASBE:What, Why, and How? Workshop Activities Time Management Training Venue Food
Average
3.65 3.66 3.65 3.66 3.65 3.65 3.66 3.65 3.75 3.69 3.74
Overall Rating
3.67
Legend: 4321-
Verbal Interpretation
Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
