F R A M E W O R K D E S I G N

F OR ME T A L - C E R A MI C R E S T OR AT I ON S
Manual
2
The fabrication of aesthetic and functional
metal-supported ceramic restorations
requires both comprehensive knowledge
and high skills. Restorations are often
assessed solely on the basis of their
aesthetic appearance. However, this is not
quite sufficient for a functional, durable
restoration. This Manual on "Framework
design for metal-ceramic restorations"
discusses the physical properties and
materials science aspects of the two
material types used, i.e. alloys and
veneering ceramic, in order to outline the
complex context.
In addition to the theoretical basics, the
fabrication of two different framework
constructions in dependence of the alloy
properties will be explained step by step.
To further explain the interplay between
the framework material and the veneering
ceramic, all the veneers have been reduced
on one side (see cover picture).
The objective of this Manual is to support
you even better in your daily work.
3
Overview
Framework statics (stability) 4
Strength of bridge frameworks 5
Connector areas of bridge frameworks 6
Connector areas / material dynamics 7
Connector areas / direction of loading 12
Factors for the strength of alloys
and metal-ceramics 114
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion CTE 15
Heat resistance 16
Basic prerequisites of abutment preparation 17
Framework design in the marginal area 18
Functional framework design for the veneering ceramic 21
Functional support of the veneering ceramic 1 23
Framework design for bridge frameworks 24
Transition from the alloy to the veneering ceramic 25
Design of bridge pontics 28
Design of the proximal area 32
Framework design from an aesthetic point of view 33
Step-by-step instructions 38
Trouble shooting chart 48
Literature 50
4
Framework statics (stability)
In order not to compromise the optical and
functional aspects (hygiene ability), the frame-
work reinforcements are positioned in the less
obvious areas.
During oxidation and the subsequent ceramic
firings, alloy frameworks are exposed to
considerable thermal stress. If the framework
design is incorrect and the wall thicknesses are
insufficient, the heat treatment may cause
distortion of the framework alloy and,
eventually, inaccuracy of fit. The ceramic exerts
compressive stress on the framework during
sintering and the subsequent cooling phase.
Only an appropriate design of the framework
protects from deformation.
Only if the framework is stable enough, is the
fabrication of a full ceramic veneer possible. If
not enough space is available, the stress-bearing
areas of the veneered bridge are fabricated of
metal (with a fully anatomic design).
Heat treatment may result in deformation of too thin and too delicate
framework constructions. This may lead to considerable problems affecting the
marginal integrity during firing and during the cooling phase due to residual
thermal stress caused by the difference between the CTE of the alloy and that of the
ceramic material.
During mastication, compressive, flexural, shear, and tensile stresses are exerted on
the alloy framework. The ceramic veneering material tolerates torsional movements
of the metal framework only to a certain extent.
In connector areas between bridge pontics and abutment teeth, the framework
material must demonstrate adequate thickness. The framework construction
must be able to withstand the mentioned forces.
5
Strength of bridge frameworks
The alloys and the working technique have to be selected in such a way that the
fabrication of a stable framework for ceramic veneering material is possible.
The strength of the alloy framework is influenced by the preparation, abutment
teeth, contour of the abutment teeth, type of alloy, and the design of the frame-
work.
Important
It is important to know the properties of the alloy, particularly the modulus of
elasticity and the 0.2 % proof stress.
The lower the modulus of elasticity and the 0.2 % proof stress, the more stable
the framework walls and connector areas of the bridge framework have to be
designed.
If the alloy features a high modulus of elasticity and proof stress, a high amount
of force is required to deform the alloy framework.
Base metal alloys with a higher modulus of elasticity and a higher proof stress
may be used for more delicate framework designs.
Since base metal alloys oxidize more easily and intensively and show a darker oxide on
their surface, they have to be appropriately masked with a thicker opaquer layer.
Bridge reconstruction made of a high-gold alloy Bridge reconstruction made of a palladium-based alloy
6
Since a metal-ceramic bridge is also planned with aesthetic considerations in mind,
special requirements are placed on the connector areas of a bridge framework. The
objective is to design the connector areas in such a way that they are both
stable and satisfy the aesthetic demands.
Connector variants:
Single-piece casting
Attachment connections
Joining technique
Solder connections before and after firing (see Soldering Manual)
Laser arc and impulse welding connections
Single-piece casting is the most commonly used method to achieve the best
possible strength of the bridge framework. The cast structure must be
homogeneous.
Connector areas of bridge
frameworks
The functional requirements of a metal-ceramic restoration must
always take precedence over the aesthetic considerations.
TIP
If divergences exist between the abutment teeth, they are evened out
by means of attachment connections.
7
Connector areas /
material dynamics
Important: From a clinical standpoint the height can scarcely be
replaced by width.
The geometry and size of the cross-section influence the strength of the bridge
restoration. For dental alloys, longish and round cross-sections are selected, since
the tensile and compressive strengths are basically equal to each other.
Note
The deflection of a bridge that rests on two abutments depends on the
geometry of the connector cross-section
The deflection of a bridge may lead to extreme stress exerted on the
abutments
The larger the span width between the abutment teeth, the
higher the risk of deformation for the bridge reconstruction.
Single width of the connector
= Single stability
Double width of the connector
= Double stability
Double height of the connector with
single width
= Eightfold stability
The dimensions of the framework cross-section must be large enough, especially in
the direction of loading. For the posterior area, an adequate height of the connec-
tors is important, while a horizontal reinforcement in the lingual direction should
be provided in the anterior area.
Note
The height of the connector cross-section counteracts the degree of
deformation
By doubling the height, the degree of deformation is reduced by a factor of 8
By doubling the span, the degree of deformation is increased by a factor of 8
The flexural resistance is equal for all three
test samples.
h 3
h 2
h 4
b 2
b 4.74
b 16
8
An increased curvature of the beam and/or a thicker ceramic layer at the underside
of the restoration increases the tensile stress.
The cross-section of the interdental connector area decisively influences both the
strength of the restoration during the dental-lab procedures and the clinical long-
term success after cementation. Therefore, the cross-section of the interdental
connector must be adequately dimensioned in accordance with the alloy used
(particularly with high-gold alloys). The thermal behaviour of the selected alloy
during the working procedure in the dental laboratory has to be considered for the
connector design.
In bridge restorations with a shorter span width, the connector
cross-section must comply with the minimum requirements. If
the same deformation load is applied to two beams, one of
which is half the length of the other, the curvature of the shorter one
will be four times more pronounced than that of the longer one. The
maximum tensile strength not only depends on the absolute
deflection value, but also on the corresponding curvature.
Single width of the connector
= Single stability
Double width of the connector
= Double stability
Double height of the
connector with single width
= Eightfold stability
Masticatory stress = F
Tensile stress
Connector cross-sections
Materials have a limit of elastic deformation i.e. the elastic limit. The elasticity of
a material is quantified by the modulus of elasticity. The modulus of elasticity
describes the resistance against elastic deformation.
For reasons of easier measurability, the 0.2 % proof stress is used as an alternative
technical elastic limit.
It is actually beyond the true elastic limit, since at this load, an alloy will undergo
0.2 % permanent, i.e. plastic deformation in tensile tests.
The connector cross-sections in dental restorations must be designed in such a way
that the 0.2 % proof stress is not reached under the usual masticatory forces.
9
Masticatory load = F
Deformation = d
Pontic span / length = l
The connector cross-sections listed in the table have been defined taking the
physical data of the alloys and veneering ceramic into account.
These connector dimensions are to be considered minimum requirements. They
include a double safety margin as regards the specified minimum requirements.
The dimensions of the connector cross-sections depend on the physical properties
of the materials.
Since the vertical masticatory load in the posterior region differs from the verti-
cal/horizontal load in the anterior region, the connector cross-sections may also
show some differences.
Masticatory load = F
Pontic span
length = I 20 mm
Masticatory load = F
Pontic span
length = I 10 mm
Alloy:
0.2 % proof stress
Load-bearing capacity in N
Restoration
Connector cross-sections in mm
270 MPa
360 MPa
500 MPa
700 MPa
3-unit
metal-ceramic restoration
4-unit
metal-ceramic restoration
1000 N
Premolars,
molars
600 N
Anterior
1000 N
Premolars,
molars
600 N
Anterior
5
3
4
3
4
3
3.2
3
3
2.5
6
3
5.5
3
4.5
3
3.8
3
3
3
3
2.5
2.5
2.5
5
3
4
3
3.5
3
3
3
10
In addition to the 0.2 % proof stress, a number of other factors also
influence the connector cross-sections:
Modulus of elasticity - the higher the modulus of elasticity, the lower is the
elastic deformation
Span of the metal-ceramic restoration
Layer thickness of the veneering ceramic the thicker the layer of the
veneering ceramic, the higher is the tensile stress (especially in the basal area)
Fracture of a metal-ceramic posterior bridge
Example of a restoration that fractured as a result of an inadequately dimensioned connector cross-section
Schematic diagram of the connector areas of two alloys with a different 0.2 % proof stress in MPa, in dependence of the masticatory load in N.
Incorrect cross-section of the metal-framework of
1.5 x 2.5 mm = 3.75 mm
2
vertical dimension only
1.5 mm in the bending direction!
Correct cross-section
The connector dimensions are
way below the required
minimum values.
Only the correct dimensioning
of the connector cross-section
results in appropriate stability
for a fully functional
restoration.
11
The following aspects have to be observed in the fabrication of metal-
ceramic restorations in the dental laboratory:
Only if there is enough space between the alveolar process and the antagonist,
may the alloy framework be veneered on all sides.
If space is limited, attempts should be made to compensate the missing height
by increasing the width. However, this is most often not possible without
substantially compromising the conditions for self-cleaning and oral hygiene. If
the height of the alloy framework has to be reduced, the required strength can
be achieved by leaving certain surfaces non-veneered.
Scallops in invisible areas of the restoration increase its strength.
If additional strength is necessary, the palatal surface in maxillary restorations
and/or the lingual surface in mandibular restorations may be left non-veneered.
If space is extremely limited, yet another outer surface of the restoration must
remain non-veneered. This may either be the vestibular or occlusal surface in
the mandible, while it is always the occlusal surface in the maxilla.
If there is only enough space for the minimum metal cross-section, the bridge
restoration cannot be veneered.
The alloy framework must never be designed with weak statics just to fabricate
a questionable veneer.
For bridges with shorter span widths, the same minimum requirements must be
observed.
The aim is to achieve an even ceramic surface.
If uneven ceramic layer thicknesses cannot be prevented, the thicker layers
should always be located in the pressure areas.
12
Connector areas /
direction of loading
In pure posterior bridges, vertical occlusal forces are the strongest of the occurring
forces. In the anterior region, horizontal stress in a sagittal direction caused by
protrusive and lateral movements of the mandible during intercuspation are also
exerted on bridge reconstruction in addition to the vertical occlusion forces.
Framework connectors between the anterior and the posterior
region, therefore, also have to be given an adequately stable
design in a horizontal lingual direction, as well as the suitable
height.
Stable connector areas
for adequate strength
with U-shaped design
The connector areas are designed in such away that
they extend to the occlusal surface
U-shaped design in the
connector area
The design of proximal
areas should be gentle to
the periodontium
Extend the connector area lingually and
proximally as close to the occlusal and labial
surface as possible.
Extend the connectors as far as possible towards
the labial/buccal and occlusal/cervical aspect
without overly compromising the aesthetic
properties. The connector area must provide
adequate strength and stability.
13
Particularly in the canine area, tensile and torsional stresses are also exerted on the
connector areas, in addition to the vertical and horizontal stresses.
The connector areas must always be designed to ensure
adequate stability. The lingual area should have a U-shaped
design towards the gingiva.
The connectors of canines should be particularly
pronounced, since they have to withstand
extremely high stress.
14
Factors for the strength of alloys
and metal-ceramics
The most important factors determining the strength of the
metal-ceramic restoration include the bonding strength at the
interfaces, the strength of the framework, and the different
coefficients of thermal expansion of the alloy and the ceramic.
The average thickness of veneered framework constructions is 1.52.0 mm on the
labio-buccal side; 1.21.5 mm thereof are made up of ceramic material and 0.3
0.5 mm of alloy. The greater part of the occurring forces (e.g. occlusal forces) is
borne by the alloy framework.
The strength of a metal-ceramic bridge largely depends on the alloy framework, if
tensile stress at the ceramic surface is to be expected.
The homogeneous bond between the alloy and
the ceramic layers not only increases the
strength of ceramic-veneered frameworks, but
also substantially reduces the fracture
susceptibility of ceramic materials. In fact, it is
this sound bond between alloys and veneering
ceramics that permits minimum alloy framework
thicknesses of 0.30.5 mm.
The applied force produces compressive stresses
at the upper side of the bridge reconstruction
and tensile stresses at its underside. The
compressive strength of the ceramic is
considerably higher than its tensile strength. If
the tensile stress exceeds the tensile strength of
the ceramic, cracks may develop which will
ultimately result in fracture.
Veneering ceramic
1.21.5 mm
Tensile stress
Force F
Force F
h
b
Compressive stress
Tensile stress
Framework
0.30.5 mm
Opaquer
15
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
(CTE)
As a rule, the CTE of the veneering ceramic must be lower than
the CTE of the alloy. In this way, the veneering ceramic is put
under compressive stress.
Ceramic alloys and ceramic veneering materials must have similar coefficients of
thermal expansion in the temperature ranges of 25500 C or 20600 C in order
to keep the stresses in the interface areas of both materials to a minimum.
Ceramic alloys have a slightly higher coefficient of thermal expansion than ceramic
veneering materials. This results in the development of tensile stresses in the alloy
during cooling after firing, and of compressive stresses in the veneering ceramic.
Ceramic materials with a CTE value that is approximately 1 mm / m k lower than
that of the alloy are selected. This means that for traditional feldspar ceramics, the
CTE value should be at least 5 % but a maximum of 10 % below the CTE value of
the alloy. Basically, the instructions of the corresponding manufacturers have to be
observed.
High CTE of the alloy / Select a firing cycle with slow cooling
low CTE of the ceramic
Low CTE of the alloy / Select a firing cycle with quick cooling
high CTE of the ceramic
The coefficient of thermal expansion is a unit of measure for the dimensional
changes of a substance under a defined thermal influence. The CTE is the unit of
measure to determine a possible alloy-ceramic combination.
16
Heat resistance
During oxidation and firing of the veneering ceramic, the alloy
must demonstrate adequate heat resistance to prevent the
alloy framework from sagging (sag resistance). This is
particularly important for long-span bridges. Therefore, alloys
are usually required to have a solidus temperature that is
approximately 100 C higher than the firing temperature of the
veneering ceramic.
The heat resistance depends on the following factors:
Composition of the alloy: In general, high-gold alloys that do not contain any
metals of the platinum group demonstrate low distortion resistance.
Framework design: Depending on the alloy type used, the contouring of the
framework must be carried out in such a way that adequate support is
provided. Large span widths with massive pontics always increase the weight
of the restoration and thus require a stable framework.
Density of the alloy: The higher the density of the alloy, the higher is also its
weight.
Temperature: If possible, the solidus point of the alloy should be as far away
from the firing and soldering temperatures as possible.
Duration of the heat treatment: The longer the duration of the heat treatment,
the higher is the risk of distortion.
Oxide firing: In order to achieve an accurately fitting bridge framework after
firing, the framework must always be adequately supported during the firing
procedures (starting with oxide firing and continuing with all the subsequent
firing cycles). All abutments must be supported using firing pins.
Furnace calibration: The ceramic furnace must be regularly calibrated to ensure
exact temperature control.
Heat resistance describes the stability of shape of materials under the influence of
heat.
Pins before a heat resistance test
Dimensions of the pins: Length 50 mm,
diameter 4 mm
Metal pins bent by gravity after a
10-minute heat treatment at 1005 C,
i.e. 50 C below the solidus point
17
An adequately stable and aesthetic metal-ceramic restoration is also achieved by a
preparation with ample available space.
If the minimum space requirements cannot be met because the
abutment tooth cannot be adequately reduced (prepared), a
metal-ceramic restoration is contraindicated.
Basic prerequisites of
abutment preparation
The minimum reduction for the preparation is 1.21.3 mm in the central area and
usually 1.51.6 mm in the incisal area.
If conventional cementation is to be applied, a minimum height of the prepared
stump of 3 mm and a convergence angle of approximately 6 have to be observed.
More space for the metal-ceramic restoration is always considered ideal and should
be preferred.
030
3
1

6
0

6
1

9
0

Acute Flat Shoulder

1.2 mm
2.0 mm
1.5 mm
1.2 mm
2.0 mm
1.5 mm
1.5 mm
1.2 mm
Preparation in the marginal area:
The larger the marginal angle, the more ideal are the conditions for creating a
ceramic shoulder or for neatly veneering the metal margin with ceramic. With
angles smaller than 50, the metal margin may only be covered with an over-
contoured ceramic layer. A visible alloy margin is then almost unavoidable.
18
For the physiological design of the crown margin, the following
aspects apply:
The crown margin ...
... must show sound accuracy of fit with the preparation margin
must be able to withstand the effects of masticatory stress
must demonstrate permanent stability of shape
must produce a smooth, gapless transition to the prepared tooth
must run in the sulcus gingivae
Framework design in
the marginal area
The crown design in the marginal area and the accuracy of fit on the natural tooth
stump directly influence the periodontal health.
For ceramic veneers, the materials at the crown margin must demonstrate a
minimum thickness in order to achieve ample stability and appropriate shade repro-
duction.
The accuracy of fit of the alloy framework must be maintained even after several
ceramic firings.
Deformation of the alloy, which might occur as a result of the slight difference
between the solidus point of the alloy and the firing temperature of the ceramic
(approximately 150 C), must be prevented by designing a stable, robust frame-
work.
During the ceramic firing cycles, the framework in general and the margin area in
particular must not expand.
Only the definite end of the
margin is tapered.
Framework thickness
in the marginal area
min. 0.30.5 mm
Framework thickness
in the marginal area
min. 0.30.5 mm
incorrect incorrect incorrect
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
Framework too thin
0.3 mm
Framework too thin
0.3 mm
19
Important:
An inadequate crown margin design may lead to (secondary) caries and injury to
the marginal periodontium.
The restorative crown margins should be designed in such a way that the natural
tooth contour is continued in the marginal area of the crown and the veneer. Over-
or undercontoured crown margins have to be avoided, since they may lead to
injury of the marginal periodontium.
A flawless crown margin is indispensable.
Fused-on ceramic shoulder
Shoulder or chamfer preparation
The entire shoulder area is supplemented with ceramic shoulder material
Presents optimum possibilities for a precise marginal finish
A ceramic shoulder produces the least stress in the cervical area
In aesthetically critical areas, optimum space conditions for the framework and
the ceramic should result in excellent aesthetics
Note
With fused-on ceramic shoulders, it must be
made sure that the framework, as well as the
veneer is supported by the prepared tooth. Reduce the
framework exactly up to the inner edge of the chamfer
or shoulder preparation. In this way, functional support
of the framework by the preparation is ensured.
Ceramic shoulder
min. 0.8 mm
Framework thickness in
the marginal area
min. 0.30.5 mm
incorrect correct
The metal framework can only be veneered by overcontouring the ceramic If the overcontoured area is eliminated, the opaquer is exposed
Exposed
opaquer
Overcontoured
ceramic
20
incorrect correct
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
1.0 mm
0.5 mm
correct
incorrect incorrect
Tapered (non-visible) metal margin
Shoulder or chamfer preparation
The metal margin is reduced and thinly tapered and then
veneered with ceramic material
By reinforcing the framework in the shoulder area,
the ceramic is prevented from bending up
Good accuracy of fit is achieved with a shoulder preparation
Preferably, the crown margin should be placed slightly sub-
gingival
Metal margin
Bevelled shoulder or chamfer preparation
Depending on the width of the bevel, the alloy margin will be visible in the
marginal area
A good marginal seal is possible with a bevelled shoulder
Visible alloy margins in aesthetically non-critical areas
The tapered margins must be reinforced to counteract the bending up of the
margins during ceramic firing
The opaquer layer of at least 0.25 mm must be covered with ceramic material,
even in the marginal area. Exposed, coarse-grained opaquer material will lead
to irritation of the gingiva and plaque accumulation
Tangential margin
Is ground like a tapered margin and, in ideal cases, describes the root cross-
section and the crown margin demarcation line
Easy to prepare and features the least loss in tooth structure
The preparation margin is barely visible in the oral cavity and on the working
die
An exact crown margin is difficult to achieve and rather left to chance
Can be used for young teeth with a large pulp chamber
Overcontouring in the marginal area must be prevented
Exposure of the opaquer must be prevented (irritation of the gingiva, plaque
accumulation)
21
Varying layer thicknesses of the veneering material result in
undesired shade differences and uncontrollable shrinkage of the
ceramic material coupled with tensile stress.
Layer thickness
veneering ceramic
0.82.0 mm
Framework thickness
min. 0.30.5 mm
Functional framework design for
the veneering ceramic
The design of the alloy framework for the veneering ceramic is of utmost
importance. The functional and structural balance of the framework construction
is decisive for the success or failure of the metal-ceramic restoration.
The contoured crown and bridge frameworks
should always allow an even layer thickness of the
veneering ceramic. In order to achieve an even
shade of the veneer, the layering thickness of the
ceramic veneer should not fall below 0.8 mm or
exceed 2.0 mm.
If this layer thickness is not possible in the
marginal area of the crown due to the risk of over-
contouring, the opaquer must at least be covered
with a ceramic layer of 0.25 mm.
The minimum thickness of the framework after
finishing has to be at least 0.3 mm for single
crowns and at least 0.5 mm for abutment crowns
in bridge frameworks.
The reduced dimensions of the prepared abutment
teeth are always evened out by the wax-up of the
framework.
22
TIP
If no situation model is available, a full wax-up of the intended restora-
tion should always be fabricated. The wax-up is then evenly and
proportionally reduced for the ceramic veneer (11.5 mm; reduced
contours). The thus produced reduced tooth shape then serves as the
statically supporting framework for the veneering ceramic.
Alloy frameworks for ceramic veneers must meet the following
requirements:
Wax-up of the suitable framework construction
Use of a suitable alloy
A compatible alloy-ceramic combination must be used
Stress exerted on the ceramic must be absorbed by the framework construction
The cross-sections of the framework connectors must be dimensioned in such a
way that they provide ample stability
Scallops reinforce the framework and enable even cooling
The pontics should be fabricated in such a way that they support the veneering
ceramic and enable more even cooling, e.g. by creating scallops
The transition areas between the metal and the ceramic must never be located
in contact or gliding areas
At the ceramic-alloy interface, the framework should be perpendicular to the
ceramic (in this way, stress concentration at the ceramic-alloy interface is
reduced and exposure of the ceramic opaquer at the bonding interface is
prevented)
The framework should be given a design that enables an even layer thickness
of the veneering ceramic
To achieve a true-to-nature shade effect of the veneering ceramic, a minimum
layer thickness of 0.8 mm is required
The surface of the framework construction must not show any sharp angles or
edges it must always be smooth and rounded
Cast frameworks must not show any defects, such as porosity or bubbles
Framework constructions must demonstrate sufficient firing stability,
particularly in the marginal area
The stress-bearing framework must be designed as stable as possible
23
Functional support of
the veneering ceramic
The framework reflects the reduced tooth shape. It must be contoured in such a
way that it provides incisal and occlusal support. An even, proportional layer
thickness should be achieved in the incisal area, as well as in the cusp and fissure
areas. In this way, the forces that are applied during static and functional
masticatory loading are mainly transmitted to the framework and not to the
veneering ceramic alone.
Anterior crowns
Premolar crowns
Molar crowns
correct incorrect
correct incorrect
The main load of the forces that are applied, e.g. occlusal forces
and stress in a labio-lingual direction, is absorbed by the alloy
framework.
correct incorrect
24
Framework design for
bridge frameworks
On frameworks veneered with ceramic, thermal stress is exerted during firing and
functional masticatory stress after cementation. These forces must be transmitted
to the framework rather than to the ceramic veneer. In bridge frameworks, the
stability in the connector areas between the bridge abutments and bridge pontic in
particular must be ensured by the framework design and adequate framework
thickness.
correct
correct
incorrect
25
Transition from the alloy to the
veneering ceramic
The transition from the alloy framework to the veneering ceramic must be clearly
defined. The interfaces to the ceramic material must not demonstrate any sharp
edges, grooves, angles, hollow spaces, or undercuts.
Requirements for the transition area
An adequate layer thickness in the transition
area must be ensured
The opaquer layer should not be exposed
(plaque accumulation on coarse-grained,
porous opaquer material, irritation of the
gingiva)
The external angle between the framework
and the veneering ceramic should be 90
The transition areas should be given convex
contours
A smooth transition area ensures an
optimum surface and supports polishing
and cleaning
Chamfer preparation
0.51.0 mm
1.01.5 mm
0.51.0 mm
1.01.5 mm
Exposed opaquer
Exposed
opaquer
Opaquer
Framework
Ceramic
Gap
Marginal shrinkage of the ceramic
in the deep chamfer
Transition area between alloy and ceramic correct
26
Occlusal and proximal contacts or contacts established by excursive movements must
consist of either metal alone or ceramic alone.
Occlusal and proximal contacts
Transition areas between metal and ceramic must be at least 2.5 mm away from any contact
points in the occlusal area and at least 1 mm in the proximal area.
Occlusion at the incisal edge
Gliding surface entirely on the ceramic material
Occlusion at the interface between metal and ceramic
Gliding surface on metal and ceramic
Contact point with adjacent gliding surface
During excursive movements of the mandible guided by the palatal surface of
the maxillary canine the interface between the framework and the veneer must
not be located on this gliding path.
The interface between metal and ceramic must never be located on a gliding
surface or a contact point. The gliding surface of the maxillary teeth, particularly
the canines, must be designed of metal alone or ceramic alone. The palatal surface
is designed in accordance with the depth of the overbite.
2.5 mm
Fracture
of the
ceramic
correct incorrect
min. 1 mm
min. 1 mm
Framework thickness
min. 0.50.8 mm
Transition
metal ceramic
Transition
metal ceramic
Framework thickness
min. 0.30.5 mm
Contact point
Contact point
27
Occlusion in the cervical area
Gliding surface entirely on the metal
framework
Occlusion in the central area
Gliding surface entirely on the ceramic
Occlusion in the cervical area
Gliding surface entirely on the ceramic
correct
correct
correct
28
Design of bridge pontics
The bridge pontics represent a reduction of the original shape of the natural tooth
to be replaced. During fabrication, hygienic, functional, and aesthetic aspects are
taken into account. Adequate personal oral hygiene and an individualized
preventive treatment regime are the basic prerequisites for long-term success.
Functional requirements for bridge pontics
Basically, bridge pontics are fabricated in the same way as abutment frameworks.
They represent the load-bearing framework for the veneering ceramic. Therefore,
the same basic prerequisites apply:
The bridge pontic replaces the missing tooth and carries the veneering ceramic
The connector areas between the bridge pontic and the bridge abutment have
to be given a stable design
Lingual reinforcement of the bridge pontics by contoured scallops is indicated
for certain alloy types
Massive bridge pontics are evenly and thus better cooled if they have a
scalloped design
When including scallops, the bridge pontics must already be given a convex
design during the fabrication of the wax-up
Framework
Connector area
Scallop
Scallop
Framework
Connector
area
29
Because of the cusp-fossa
intercuspation, the palatal
cusps in the maxilla are
under higher masticatory
stress than the lingual
cusps in the mandible
(normal bite). Providing
adequate support is
especially important for the
stress-bearing palatal cusps
in the maxilla.
Masticatory load
Masticatory load Fracture
Bridge pontics 22, 12, 1416
30
The bridge pontic must support the veneering ceramic at the basal surface towards the gingiva.
Too large a distance between the framework and the gingiva at the basal surface has to be
prevented. Sharp edges and angles have to be rounded out and an even layer thickness of the
veneering ceramic has to be ensured.
In cantilevered bridges, the dimensions of the bridge pontics have to be reduced. The
cantilevered pontic has to be supported by at least two abutment teeth. Even cooling of the
massive bridge pontic should be ensured by way of a scalloped design.
correct incorrect
The lower the modulus of elasticity and the 0.2 % proof stress of an alloy, the
more a scalloped design of the bridge pontics is recommended. In massive
bridge pontics, a scalloped design provides a cooling area which minimizes the
stresses occurring within the ceramic.
31
Rest area of the bridge pontics on the gingiva
Sanitary bridges
Indicated for regions in the oral cavity, in
which neither aesthetic considerations, nor
phonetic functions play an important role.
Spot-type, drop-shaped bridge pontic
rest
The bridge pontic rests only on certain
points on the gingiva and demonstrates a
convex shape. In such restorations, the
morphology and the phonetic functions are
limited.
Reduced bridge pontic rest
Labial and buccal similar to a natural tooth.
The lingual, convex shape of the bridge
pontic is extended to the center of the
alveolar ridge. High aesthetic quality. Self-
cleaning is ensured by the convex shape of
the bridge pontic.
Saddle rest of the bridge pontic
The bridge pontic follows the natural shape
of the tooth. High aesthetic quality, since
the bridge pontic fills the entire gap
between the teeth. A pleasant feeling for
the tongue.
The basal surface of the bridge pontic should be made of ceramic, since it comes
into direct contact with the gingiva. Glazed ceramics demonstrate the highest
biocompatibility. The critical transition areas between metal and ceramic should
not come into contact with the soft oral tissues.
Cleaning capabilities of bridge pontics
Spot-type, drop shaped rest Reduced rest Saddle rest
32
Design of the proximal area
Once the clinically required strength of a bridge restoration has been achieved, the proximal areas
must also be given a clinically sound design. The framework and its thickness must also meet the
optical and functional requirements. Moreover, the aspects of periodontal hygiene must be given
particular attention.
Extend the connectors up to
the occlusal surface
U-shaped design of the connector
area facing the periodontium
Periodontium-friendly design of
the proximal area
correct incorrect incorrect
The framework connectors in the posterior region should be extended up to the occlusal surface.
This type of framework design also enables a suitable design of the proximal area towards the
periodontium
The connector area facing the periodontium should always be given a U-shaped, rather than a
V-shaped design
The periodontium must not be affected or even displaced by an overly pronounced design of the
proximal area
The convex shape of the bridge pontics guide the hygiene aids into the interdental spaces
Cleaning capabilities with interdental brushes
The proximal areas must enable adequate oral hygiene and individualized preventive treatment
regimes. During framework design, an adequate opening of the interdental area must be taken into
consideration so that oral hygiene with interdental brushes and dental floss can be performed. No
black triangles should be created.
33
Framework design from an
aesthetic point of view
During the fabrication of the framework, the light transmission (passage of light)
of the veneering ceramic must also be taken into account. Aesthetic considerations
for veneered restorations are directly related to the layer thickness of the veneering
material.
In order to achieve relatively high translucency in the mesial and distal proximal areas, as well as in
the incisal area of the veneering ceramic, a statically correctly reduced framework construction
should be achieved.
The balance between a statically sound and aesthetic framework construction is necessary for a
metal-ceramic restoration.
Light transmission Light transmission
Adequate framework reduction favours the light transmission in the
interdental and incisal area
Without framework reduction, light transmission is prevented
min. 1 mm
min. 1 mm
Framework thickness
min. 0.50.8 mm
Interface between
metal and ceramic
Interface between
metal and ceramic
Framework thickness
min. 0.30.5 mm
Contact point
Contact point
Light
penetration
Reinforced
framework
area
Light
penetration
Too thinly tape-
red transition
between metal
and ceramic
Framework
too thin
Reinforced
framework area
34
In order to meet the static and aesthetic requirements, the framework reinforcements are placed in
the non-visible, lingual area.
If the framework construction reaches too far
into the proximal or occlusal area, clear shadows
will be visible.
Correct framework reduction prevents the
creation of shadows in the veneering ceramic in
the proximal and occlusal areas.
Incident light
TIP
To achieve adequate light transmission, certain basic requirements must be fulfilled:
Chamfer or shoulder of 11.2 mm
Minimum space requirement for the veneering ceramic of 0.8 mm
Thickness of the ceramic veneer in the occlusal area of at least 1.5 mm
Framework thickness of at least 0.30.5 mm depending on the alloy type and design
of the framework
Optimally reduced, but adequately stable framework construction
In order to achieve light
transmission, the framework
construction is reduced in a
targeted fashion.
Important!
The framework reduction must not
result in unacceptable weakening of
the framework
The available space in the proximal
and occlusal areas, as well as the alloy
type used, must be taken into
consideration in this context
35
In order to fabricate an aesthetic restoration, the
framework should be contoured in such a way
that it does not extend too far into the incisal
area lingually.
Ceramic incisal area
1.11.2 mm
Opaquer material
0.10.2 mm
Dentin material
1.5 mm
Central
ceramic area
0.80.9 mm
Framework thickness 0.30.5 mm Framework thickness 0.30.5 mm
Ceramic incisal area
1.52.0 mm
Framework
thickness
0.5 mm
The framework construction must support the veneering ceramic. However, it is
reduced in a statically sensible manner to allow the fabrication of aesthetic
restorations.
Framework and ceramic layer thicknesses for aesthetic restorations
Palatal and lingual framework design
incorrect correct correct
Opaquer material
0.10.2 mm
36
To achieve a good aesthetic appearance, the vertical dimensions of the alloy
margin should not be excessively increased.
In the visible areas of the restoration, an alloy margin should not be fabricated for
aesthetic reasons. A chamfer with an invisible metal edge or, even better, a ceramic
shoulder are solutions that meet the aesthetic requirements. In the less visible
posterior region, a subgingival alloy margin is often possible and helps support the
veneering ceramic.
The framework construction is instrumental in
fabricating translucent restorations. In metal-
ceramic veneers, the transition areas at the
proximo-incisal and lingual surfaces have to be
taken into consideration. The interfaces should be
moved to the lingual area to as large an extent as
possible. In this way, a darkening of the veneering
ceramic by incident light of a certain angle can be
prevented.
In metal-ceramic restorations, incident light is
reflected by the opaquer layer and, ultimately, by
the metal framework. Depending on the incident
angle, shadows are created at the proximal
surfaces. These shadows, however, may be
minimized by an optimized reduction of the
framework construction. With an optimum frame-
work construction, the light is reflected to a
higher or lesser degree, depending on the
incident angle.
A true-to-nature in-depth effect is achieved if light can
penetrate deeply into the veneering ceramic = translucency.
In restorations with low translucency, light is more strongly
refracted. The light rays are more strongly reflected instead of
penetrating the veneering ceramic.
Penetrating scattered light
Specular light
penetration
Alloy framework
No light penetration
Direct light transmission
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
l
i
g
h
t
Direct
reflection
Scattered
reflection
Specular reflection
Reflection and penetration of incident light
37
Scattering of light reflection or refraction occur in a
transparent substance if the light falls on another substance
that has a different refractive index.
Translucency with an in-depth effect is achieved with a sufficiently thick layer of
(translucent) ceramic material. Sufficiently thick in this instance means that the
material sufficiently reduces the direct reflection of the opaquer layer.
Incident light is directly reflected by the
opaquer material layer and the reflected light is
scattered. Light penetration occurs in the incisal
and proximal areas of the veneering ceramic.
Incident light
Shadows
Wrap-around effect in metal-ceramic restorations
Conventional ceramic layering Ideal ceramic layering Natural tooth
38
Starting situation of the metal-ceramic restoration
A master model or model with detachable segments based on the impression is fabricated as a
working model. The preparation is carefully exposed and marked. A sealer layer is applied to harden
the stone die. However, the sealer must not result in any dimensional changes. After that, a spacer
may be applied.
The following pages will describe two ways of fabricating an alloy framework for metal-ceramic
restorations.
Step-by-step instructions
Fabrication of a master model or model with detachable segments and model oriented in the Stratos 300 according to average values
Dies with applied sealer and spacer
39
Framework fabrication
Full wax-up
The framework reflects the reduced anatomical tooth shape (tooth shape-supporting contouring).
In this way, the veneering ceramic may be applied as an even layer and is adequately supported.
Basically, a full wax-up and the fabrication of a silicone key to check the space conditions are
recommended.
Fully anatomical contouring of the tooth shape from occlusal, labial
buccal, and palatal
40
Contouring / reduction
During contouring, it has to be made sure that the frameworks for single crowns demonstrate a
minimum thickness of 0.3 mm and those for bridge abutments 0.5 mm after finishing. These
thicknesses are a prerequisite for the stability of the alloy framework.
Fabrication of a silicone key to check the reduced wax pattern for the alloy framework
Controlled step-by-step reduction of the contoured anteriors, ...
premolars
and molars.
Completely contoured wax framework
Cast homogeneous alloy framework Wax framework sprued for conventional bar casting
41
42
Finishing the alloy frameworks
The cast alloy frameworks are carefully divested, sandblasted or pickled, and their fit checked on the
model. After separation, the alloy frameworks are finished using tungsten carbide metal burs and/or
ceramic-bonded grinding instruments. A scalloped design is used to reinforce alloy frameworks with
lower physical values. It also permits even cooling.
Fitting and inspection on the master model
Finishing with tungsten carbide metal burs and/or ceramic-bonded grinding instruments
Checking the space conditions with the silicone key
..to ensure even layer thickness of the veneering ceramic
Framework fabrication for palladium-based
and base metal alloys
Supported framework fabrication for
high-gold and gold-reduced alloys
43
After finishing, the alloy framework is carefully blasted with Al2O3 aluminium oxide. The required
pressure depends on the alloy type. Therefore, the instructions of the alloy manufacturer have to be
observed. Use only pure, disposable jet medium.
Carefully blasted alloy framework after finishing from labial,.
... buccal
... and palatal. Alloy framework
with a reinforcing scalloped design
44
Finished and thoroughly cleaned alloy framework ready for oxidation
Alloy framework with all the abutment teeth firmly supported on the firing tray.
Oxidation according to the instructions of the alloy manufacturer
Processing and layering of the veneering ceramic according to the corresponding
Instructions for Use.
45
Completely opaquerized alloy frameworks
The first opaquer layer (wash) is thinly applied using a brush
The second opaquer layer covers the entire framework
Opaquer firing
After the application of shoulder materials and Dentin, Incisal, and Impulse layers, the ceramic
firings are completed with a glaze firing cycle. The visible alloy areas are finished and/or pickled and
subsequently polished using commercial rubber polishers and polishing pastes.
46
with and without supporting scallops
The alloy framework is invisible
from buccal
Alloy framework with
palatal reinforcements
Metal-ceramic restoration from palatal.
Completed metal-ceramic restoration
47
48
Trouble shooting chart
SOLUTIONS POSSIBLE CAUSES TYPE OF
DEFECT
I Residue from grinding instruments
I Grinding pressure too high
I Overlaps
I Jet medium
I Porous casting
I Flux on the alloy surface
Frog eyes I Use only recommended grinding instruments
I Observe recommended speed
I Use grinding instruments in one direction only
I Use only clean, disposable jet medium
I Veneer only homogeneous, clean casting objects
I Thoroughly clean the alloy surface after soldering
I No support for the veneering
ceramic
I Framework too thin
I No supporting scallops
Incorrect
framework design
I Evenly support the veneering ceramic with a
correctly dimensioned framework
I Stable framework design of 0.30.5 mm
I A scalloped design supports the framework
during firing and contributes to even cooling
I No correct, stable framework
design
I Connector areas too weak
I No supporting scallops
Framework is lifted
off, distortion
I Observe framework thickness of 0.30.5 mm
I Create adequately large connectors; the vertical
dimension is particularly important
I A scalloped design supports the framework
construction
I No cleaning capabilities because
the interdental spaces are closed
I Connectors too close to the gingiva
and V-shaped
I Incorrectly located transition area
between metal and ceramic
Incorrect pontic and
connector design
for periodontal
hygiene
I Fabricate a wax-up in order to design a restoration
that allows the best possible periodontal hygiene
I Provide the connectors with a hygiene-friendly,
U-shaped design
I The interfaces between metal and ceramic must
not be located in the area of the gingiva
I Not adequately dimensioned
framework
I Coefficients of thermal expansion
(CTE) of the alloy and ceramic are
not coordinated
I Use of non-coordinated solders
I Incorrect framework design
I Uneven ceramic layer on the metal
framework
I Inappropriate cooling
(thermal shock)
I Sharp edges and angles on the
framework
Fracture and
cracks in the
ceramic
I Observe framework thickness of 0.30.5 mm
I Check the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE)
of the alloy and the ceramic for compatibility
(standard, short-term, or long-term cooling)
I Use only a coordinated alloy / solder combination
I Always fabricate a wax-up and a silicone key
I Design the framework in such a way that it supports
the ceramic, which then allows the application of an
even ceramic layer
I Observe the correct firing parameters
I Round out sharp edges and angles on the
framework
49
SOLUTIONS POSSIBLE CAUSES TYPE OF
DEFECT
I Transition between metal and
ceramic not at a right angle
I Exposed opaquer
I Porous interface between metal
and ceramic
I Interface between metal and
ceramic in the area of the gingiva
I Interface between metal and
ceramic in the contact area with
the antagonist
Inaccurate
transition area
between the metal
and the ceramic
I Design the interface between the metal and
ceramic with a right angle
I The opaquer must be covered with fired ceramic
I Design flawless interfaces between the metal and
ceramic
I The interface between the metal and ceramic must
not be located in the area of the gingiva
I The interface between the metal and ceramic must
not be located in the contact areas to the antagonist
(at least 2.5 mm distance in the occlusal area and
1 mm in the proximal area)
I Connectors too thin
I Alloy type contraindicated for
long-span bridges
I Inhomogeneous, porous casting
object
Fractures of
metal-ceramic
restorations
I Adequate connector design for the selected
alloy type
I Use an alloy type suitable for long-span bridges
(observe the corresponding indications)
I Use only clean, homogeneous casting objects
I Incorrectly dimensioned frame-
work design
I Failure to observe the cooling
behaviour
I Heat accumulation in massive
bridge pontics
Delamination of
ceramic material
I Contour a wax-up, fabricate a correctly
dimensioned framework, which allows even ceramic
layering
I Long-term cooling may be required for certain
alloy types, CTE values, and sizes of restorations
I Massive bridge pontics should be given a
scalloped design to facilitate cooling
I Connector area not adequately
stable
I Connector not high enough
I Connector with a V-shaped
design in the interdental area
I Not enough space for a
metal-ceramic restoration
Connector areas
not correct
I Contour large enough connector areas in the
wax-up
I A lack in height of the connector area can rarely
be compensated by increasing the width (wider alloy
surfaces)
I Always give the connector a U-shaped design in the
interdental area
I Depending on the available space, the framework
may be veneered with ceramic if space is limited,
certain surfaces must be contoured in metal to
provide adequate support
50
Literature
Eichner, K., Kappert, H.F.:
Zahnrztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung, Band 1 Grundlagen
und ihre Verarbeitung. Stuttgart 2000
Hohmann, A., Hielscher, W.:
Lehrbuch der Zahntechnik, Band 1. Berlin 1985
Hohmann, A., Hielscher, W.:
Lehrbuch der Zahntechnik, Band 2. Berlin 2001
Hohmann, A., Hielscher, W.:
Zahntechnik in Frage und Antwort. Mnchen 1995
Mc Lean, J.W.:
Wissenschaft und Kunst der Dentalkeramik, Band 2. Berlin 1981
The science and art of dental ceramics Vol. 2, Chicago, Quintessenz
Publishing Company Inc., 1980
Knischewski/Rau.:
Grundwissen fr Zahntechniker 1, Werkstoffkunde Metalle.
Mnchen 1984
Marxkors, R.:
Lehrbuch der Zahnrztlichen Prothetik. Kln 2000
Schwickerath H.:
Vertrglichkeit von Dentallegierungen unter besonderer
Bercksichtigung alternativer Verfahren zur Diagnostik. Kln 1998
Dr. Strietzel, R.:
Die Werkstoffkunde der Metall-Keramik-Systeme. Mnchen 2005
Strub, J.R., Trp, J. C., Witkowski, S., Hrzeler, M.B., Kern, M.:
Curriculum Prothetik, Band 2. Berlin 1999
Uebe, HD.:
Grundwissen fr Zahntechniker 13, Handbuch des Kronen- und
Brckenersatzes. Mnchen 1996
Yamamoto, M.:
Metallkeramik Prinzipien und Methoden von Makoto Yamamoto.
Berlin 1986
Metal Ceramics - Principles and Methods of Makoto Yamamoto.
1985, Quintessenz Pub.
51
Ivoclar Vivadent worldwide
Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Bendererstrasse 2
FL-9494 Schaan
Liechtenstein
Tel. +423 235 35 35
Fax +423 235 33 60
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent Pty. Ltd.
1 5 Overseas Drive
P.O. Box 367
Noble Park, Vic. 3174
Australia
Tel. +61 3 979 595 99
Fax +61 3 979 596 45
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent GmbH
Bremschlstr. 16
Postfach 223
A-6706 Brs
Austria
Tel. +43 5552 624 49
Fax +43 5552 675 15
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent Ltda.
Rua Geraldo Flausino Gomes,
78 6. andar Cjs. 61/62
Bairro: Brooklin Novo
CEP: 04575-060 So Paulo SP
Brazil
Tel. +5511 5102 2020
Fax. +5511 5102 4704
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent Inc.
2785 Skymark Avenue, Unit 1
Mississauga
Ontario L4W 4Y3
Canada
Tel. +1 905 238 5700
Fax +1 905 238 5711
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent
Marketing Ltd.
Rm 603 Kuen Yang
International Business Plaza
No. 798 Zhao Jia Bang Road
Shanghai 200030
China
Tel. +86 21 5456 0776
Fax. +86 21 6445 1561
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent
Marketing Ltd.
Calle 134 No. 7-B-83, Of. 520
Bogot
Colombia
Tel. +57 1 627 33 99
Fax +57 1 633 16 63
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent SAS
B.P. 118
F-74410 Saint-Jorioz
France
Tel. +33 450 88 64 00
Fax +33 450 68 91 52
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent GmbH
Dr. Adolf-Schneider-Str. 2
D-73479 Ellwangen, Jagst
Germany
Tel. +49 (0) 79 61 / 8 89-0
Fax +49 (0) 79 61 / 63 26
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent
Marketing Ltd
114, Janki Centre
Shah Industrial Estate
Veera Desai Road,
Andheri (West)
Mumbai 400 053
India
Tel. +91 (22) 673 0302
Fax. +91 (22) 673 0301
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent s.r.l. & C. s.a.s
Via Gustav Flora, 32
39025 Naturno (BZ)
Italy
Tel. +39 0473 67 01 11
Fax +39 0473 66 77 80
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent K.K.
1-28-24-4F Hongo
Bunkyo-ku
Tokyo 113-0033
Japan
Tel. +81 3 6903 3535
Fax +81 3 5844 3657
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent S.A. de C.V.
Av. Mazatln No. 61, Piso 2
Col. Condesa
06170 Mxico, D.F.
Mexico
Tel. +52 (55) 5062-1000
Fax +52 (55) 5062-1029
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent Ltd
12 Omega St, Albany
PO Box 5243 Wellesley St
Auckland, New Zealand
Tel. +64 9 914 9999
Fax +64 9 630 61 48
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent
Polska Sp. z.o.o.
ul. Jana Pawla II 78
PL-01-501 Warszawa
Poland
Tel. +48 22 635 54 96
Fax +48 22 635 54 69
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent
Marketing Ltd.
Derbenevskaja Nabereshnaja
11W
115114 Moscow
Russia
Tel. +7495 913 66 16
Fax +7495 913 66 15
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent
Marketing Ltd.
180 Paya Lebar Road
# 07-03 Yi Guang Building
Singapore 409032
Tel. 65-68469183
Fax 65-68469192
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent S.A.
c/Emilio Muoz, 15
Esquina c/Albarracn
E-28037 Madrid
Spain
Tel. + 34 91 375 78 20
Fax + 34 91 375 78 38
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent AB
Dalvgen 14
S-169 56 Solna
Sweden
Tel. +46 8 514 93 930
Fax +46 8 514 93 940
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent UK Limited
Ground Floor Compass Building
Feldspar Close
Warrens Business Park
Enderby
Leicester LE19 4SE
United Kingdom
Tel. +44 116 284 78 80
Fax +44 116 284 78 81
[Link]
Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc.
175 Pineview Drive
Amherst, N.Y. 14228
USA
Tel. +1 800 533 6825
Fax +1 716 691 2285
[Link]
5
9
9
5
8
8
/
0
4
0
8
/
e
/
W