0% found this document useful (0 votes)
534 views3 pages

International Joint Ventures Analysis

1. The document discusses Danone SA's joint venture arrangements in Bangladesh, China, and India. It explores the benefits and problems encountered in each venture. 2. The joint ventures provided market entry, risk sharing, knowledge exchange, and competitive advantages. However, Danone faced compatibility issues, loss of autonomy, and changing circumstances with partners. 3. To avoid problems, Danone should have more thoroughly evaluated partners and formalized agreements to clarify roles and responsibilities.

Uploaded by

preetimutiaray
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
534 views3 pages

International Joint Ventures Analysis

1. The document discusses Danone SA's joint venture arrangements in Bangladesh, China, and India. It explores the benefits and problems encountered in each venture. 2. The joint ventures provided market entry, risk sharing, knowledge exchange, and competitive advantages. However, Danone faced compatibility issues, loss of autonomy, and changing circumstances with partners. 3. To avoid problems, Danone should have more thoroughly evaluated partners and formalized agreements to clarify roles and responsibilities.

Uploaded by

preetimutiaray
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

BBDM3133 International Business Management

Tutorial 8
Case Discussion
Look Before You Leap
The closing case describes Group Danone SAs joint venture arrangements with the Grameen
Group (Bangladesh), angshou !ahaha Group ("hina), and Britannia #ndustries $td% (#ndia)% #t
discusses the reasons &or, the objectives o& the ventures and identi&ies man' o& the bene&its and
problems that the' have encountered%
(e' )oints*
Group Danone is a )aris+based manu&acturer and mar,eter o& nutrition products in
three major segments* dair' products, water and in&ant &ood, and medical nutrition%
#ts product line consists o& 'ogurt, non+alcoholic beverages (water) and in&ant
nutrition products%
#t is the worlds largest seller o& &resh dair' products and the second largest
supplier o& bottled water%
Danone has a signi&icant commitment to doing business with the lesser developed
-emerging mar,ets. o& the world% /evenues in these mar,ets currentl' represent
one+third o& Danones overall sales% #& 'ou loo, at their web page, 'ou will note that
the' state, -The' invent business models that bene&it the most disadvantaged
populations%.
The case identi&ies and comments on three joint venture relationships*
Bangladesh (Grameen Group), "hina (0ing 1inghan), and #ndia (Britannia
#ndustries and the !adia &amil')%

Case Questions
1. Grameen Danone is a joint venture among two companies the non-profit Grameen
Group and the for-profit Group Danone SA. What are the benefits to each of these
companies? Wh did each choose to participate in the joint venture?
The Grameen Group is a lending s'stem that enables the disadvantaged
Bangladeshis (particularl' women) to increase their income and improve living
conditions% Danone provided the ,now+how in the technical areas (construction, plant
maintenance, 'ogurt production, etc%), while the mar,eting o& the 'ogurt is being
handled b' the women who are Grameens clients% The 'ogurt product was designed
to provide nutrients essential to the health o& the Bangladeshi population, most
speci&icall' the children%
Danone became involved in the project, as the' were among the &irst companies to
establish the concept o& integrating their business with social and environmental
issues%
!. "rom the perspective of each of these companies# are there an potentia$ pitfa$$s to
joining this venture?
2or the Grameen organi3ation, it was a win+win situation% 4n the other hand,
Danones ris,s were primaril' &inancial% 2rom a purel' corporate pro&it+driven
scenario, perhaps the return on investment might not come as 5uic, nor be as
pro&itable as an investment in the developed world%
%. &ow consider Danone's venture in (hina what are the benefits of this joint venture
to each of these companies? Wh did each choose to participate in the joint
venture?
The bene&its to each o& these companies were* ease o& mar,et entr', shared ris,,
shared ,nowledge6e7pertise, and s'nerg'6competitive advantage% Danone bene&ited
b' having a partner to help them get around competition and potential government
regulations, and also provided them with immediate access to this huge mar,et% 4n
the other hand, the "hinese partner bene&ited &rom Danones technical e7pertise in
the production o& so&t drin,s, sport drin,s, and bottled water%
). What cou$d Danone have done to avoid the prob$ems it is encountering in (hina and
*ndia?
The problems that Danone had with both the projects in "hina and #ndia had to deal
with incompatibilit' with their partners, con&licts over operations, loss o& autonom',
and changing circumstances% The ,e' in both situations was the &ailure to -+oo,
-efore .he +eaped%. The' should have been more thorough in identi&'ing and
evaluating partners, and the' should have been more diligent in &ormali3ing the
agreement% The' needed to ma,e sure that the agreement stated in a clear and
unambiguous wa' the status and responsibilities o& each partner%
Essay Questions
1. What are the basic differences between joint ventures and other tpes of strategic
a$$iances?
A strategic alliance is a business arrangement in which two or more &irms agree to cooperate &or
their mutual bene&it% A joint venture, a special t'pe o& strategic alliance, involves the creation o&
a new business entit' that is independent o& the parent companies% This separate entit' can
then be broader in purpose, scope, and duration than other t'pes o& strategic alliances% 8oint
ventures t'picall' have &ormal management s'stems, while other t'pes o& strategic alliances
ma' be more in&ormall' managed% Strategic alliances are usuall' considered less stable than
joint ventures because the' lac, &ormal organi3ational structures and have narrow missions%
!. What are the potentia$ pitfa$$s of strategic a$$iances?
The potential pit&alls o& strategic alliances include con&lict among partners (one o& the primar'
causes o& &ailure), access to in&ormation (&irms ma' pre&er to ,eep certain in&ormation secret),
distribution o& earnings (pro&its must be shared among partners), potential loss o& autonom'
(control must be shared among partners), and changing circumstances (as circumstances
change, the rationale behind the &ormation o& an alliance ma' no longer e7ist)%
%. Wh wou$d a firm decide to enter a new mar,et on its own rather than using a strategic
a$$iance?
There are numerous reasons wh' a &irm might decide to enter a new mar,et on its own rather
than using a strategic alliance% Some o& the more common reasons are protection o& proprietar'
in&ormation, distribution o& earnings, and strategic autonom'% A &irm ma' want to protect
proprietar' in&ormation and conse5uentl' might internali3e its e7pansion e&&ort rather than use a
strategic alliance% A &irm might want to capitali3e on the &ull potential o& a mar,et rather than
share pro&its with a strategic alliance partner% A &irm ma' want to maintain its strategic autonom'
and would there&ore enter a new mar,et on its own rather than in conjunction with a partner%

You might also like