A

PROJECT REPORT
ON
Brand Preference
Of
Mobile Phones among College Students

Submitted to:

Submitted By:

Dr. Chetan Sriwastava

Suruchi Verma

Faculty Member

(12MBMA56)

School of Management Studies

School of Management Studies

University of Hyderabad

University of Hyderabad

CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Suruchi Verma, student of School of Management Studies,
University of Hyderabad has completed her project on the topic of Brand Preference
of Mobile Phones among College Students under the supervision and guidance of Dr.
Chetan Srivastawa, Faculty member, School of Management Studies, University of
Hyderabad.

To best of my knowledge the report is original and has not been copied or submitted
anywhere else. It is an independent work done by her.

Dr. Chetan Sriwastava

Faculty Member
School of Management Studies
University of Hyderabad

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
When I embarked this project, it appeared to me as onerous task. Slowly as I progressed I
did realized that I was not alone after all.

I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Chetan Srivastava, Factalty, School of Management

Studies, University of Hyderabad who have extended their kind help, guidance and suggestion
without which it could not have been possible for me to complete this project report.

My sincere thanks to all the students for offering me all kinds of support and help in preparing
the project.

SURUCHI VERMA
(12MBMA56)

P RE F AC E

The project gives an insight of the telecom sector. It basically helps understanding the
brand preference of students with regard to mobile phones. It helps us to know what are
the bases on which a students choose a particular brand when he/she purchases a new
handset.
The project will help to learn about the growing telecom sector in India. The research will also
bring to light what all factors a student considers at the time of purchase of a new mobile
phone.

Table of Contents
1.

INTRODUCTION
....................................................................................................7 a.
Definition of Cellular/Mobile
phone ..............................................................7 b.

The Global Cellular

Mobile Industry: ...................................................................8 c. Telecom

Industry in India ...............................................................................9 d.
History of Indian Telecommunications
...............................................................10 e.

The Key players in the

Telecom Market in India........................................11

Innovation in
partnership ................................................................................21 f.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
........................................................................22
2.

RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................24

a.

SAMPLING
METHODOLOGY: ..........................................................................24
RESEARCH

b.
DESIGN:

-.......................................................................................24 c.

DATA

COLLECTION: ........................................................................................24
3.

DATA

ANALYSIS

INTERPRETATION........................................................26 4.

AND
CHI-

SQUARE ANALYSIS.....................................................................................35
5.
FINDINGS............................................................................................................
.40

6.

RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................
41

7.

LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................
42

8.

BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................................

.43 [Link]
..........................................................................................................44

1. INTRODUCTION
a. Definition of Cellular/Mobile phone
The Cellular telephone
"handphone")

is

(commonly "mobile phone"

long-range,

portable

electronic

or

"cell phone"

device

used

for

or
mobile

communication. In addition to the standard voice function of a telephone, current mobile phones
can support many additional services such as SMS for text messaging, email, packet
switching for access to the Internet, and MMS for sending and receiving photos and video. Most
current mobile phones connect to a cellular network of base stations (cell sites), which is in turn
interconnected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (the exception is satellite
phones.

Cellular telephone is also defined as a type of short-wav

analog or digital

telecommunication in which a subscriber has a wireless connection from a mobile telephone to a

relatively nearby transmitter. The transmitter's span of coverage is called a cell. Generally,
cellular telephone service is available in urban areas and along major highways. As the cellular
telephone user moves from one cell or area of coverage to another, the telephone is effectively
passed on to the local cell transmitter. A cellular telephone is not to be confused with a
cordless telephone (which is simply a phone with a very short wireless connection to a local
phone outlet). A newer service similar to cellular is personal communications services (PCS).

b. The Global Cellular Mobile Industry:

The global mobile phone industry is based on many different manufacturers and operators. The
industry is based on advanced technology and many of the manufacturers are operating
in

different

industries,

where

they

use

their technological skills, distribution network,

market knowledge and brand [Link] manufacturers of mobile phones who are today
dominating the global mobile phone industry; Samsung, Nokia, Apple, LG, Sony, L e n o v o e t c .
In addition to these companies there are many manufacturers that operate globally and locally

c. Telecom Industry in India

India is the worlds second-largest telecommunications market. The mobile phone industry in India
is likely to contribute US$ 400 billion to the countrys gross domestic product (GDP) and has the
potential to generate about 4.1 million additional jobs by 2020, as per Ms Anne Bouverot, Director
General, Groupe Speciale Mobile Association (GSMA).
Indias data story is very promising. Vodafone is investing nearly US$ 3 billion over the next two
years in India in expanding its network infrastructure and distribution channel in the country, as per
Mr Vittorio Colao, CEO, Vodafone Plc.
The telecommunications industry attracted foreign direct investments (FDI) worth US$ 59,796
million between April 2000 to January 2014, an increase of 6 per cent to the total FDI inflows in
terms of US$, according to data published by Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion
(DIPP).
BlackBerry has chosen India as the third country to set up enterprise solutions centres to educate
corporate customers about various BlackBerry Enterprise Service (BES) 10 solutions. "India is one
of the fastest growing markets in terms of smartphone and mobile data adoption, said Mr Sunil
Lalvani, Managing Director (MD), BlackBerry India.
Indias global system for mobile (GSM) operators added 4.14 million rural subscribers in January
2014, taking the total to 285.35 million.
India's GSM cellular subscriber base increased marginally in November to 688.02 million with an
addition of 4.87 million new subscribers during the month, said industry body Cellular Operators
Association of India (COAI).
Japanese companies are keen to establish telecom gear test labs in India even as the government
prepares to invite bids from private lab operators to pave the way for local testing from July 2014.
The telecom industry and the Government need to work together to attract investments and exploit
advances in technology. With the success in voice-connectivity being carried forward to data and

emerging technologies including cloud computing, the government is targeting broadband

connectivity to over 600 million in 2020.

d. History of Indian Telecommunications:

Started in 1851 when the first operational land lines were laid by the government near Calcutta
(seat of British power). Telephone services were introduced in India in 1881. In 1883 telephone
services were merged with the postal system. IndianRadio Telegraph Company (IRT) was
formed in 1923. After independence in 1947, all the foreign telecommunication companies were
nationalized to form the Posts, Telephone and Telegraph (PTT), a monopoly run by the
government's Ministry of Communications. Telecom sector was considered as a strategic
service and the government considered it best to bring under state's control.
The first wind of reforms in telecommunications sector began to flow in 1980s when the private
sector was allowed in telecommunications equipment manufacturing. In 1985, Department of
Telecommunications (DOT) was established. It was an exclusive provider of domestic and
long distance service that would be its own regulator (separate from the postal system). In
1986, two wholly government- owned companies were created: the Videsh Sanchar Nigam
Limited (VSNL) for international

telecommunications

and

Mahanagar

Telephone

Nigam

Limited (MTNL) for service in metropolitan areas.

In 1990s, telecommunications sector benefited from the general opening up of the economy. Also,
examples of telecom revolution in many other countries, which resulted in better quality of
service and lower tariffs, led Indian policy makers to initiate a change process finally resulting in
opening up of telecom services sector for the private sector. National Telecom Policy (NTP) 1994
was the first attempt to give a comprehensive roadmap for the Indian telecommunications sector.
In 1997, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was created. TRAI was formed to act as a
regulator to facilitate the growth of the telecom sector. New National Telecom Policy was
adopted in 1999 and cellular services were also launched in the same year.

Telecommunication sector in India can be divided into two segments: Fixed Service Provider
(FSPs), and Cellular Services. Fixed line services consist of basic services, national or domestic
long distance and international long distance services. The state operators (BSNL and MTNL),
account for almost 90 per cent of revenues from basic services. Private sector services are
presently available in selective urban areas, and collectively account for less than 5 per cent of
subscriptions. However, private services focus on the business/corporate sector, and offer reliable,
high- end services, such as leased lines, ISDN, closed user group and videoconferencing.

Cellular services can be further divided into two categories: Global System for Mobile
Communications (GSM) and Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA). The GSM sector is
dominated by Airtel, Vodfone-Essar, and Idea Cellular, while the CDMA sector is dominated
by Reliance and Tata Indicom. Opening up of international and domestic long distance telephony
services are the major growth drivers for cellular industry. Cellular operators get substantial
revenue from these services, and compensate them for reduction in tariffs on airtime, which
along with rental was the main source of revenue. The reduction in tariffs for airtime, national long
distance, international long distance, and handset prices has driven demand.

e. The Key players in the Telecom Market in World

1.
2.

SAMSUNG
NOKIA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1

A P P L E
L G
Z T E
H U A W E I
L E N O V O
T C L
S O N Y
B L A C K B E R R Y

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0 .

1 )

S A M S U N G

sales: 107 million

Market share: 24.7%
2)

NOKIA:
sales: 61 million
Market share: 14%

3)

APPLE:
sales: 32 million
Market share: 7.3%

4)

LG:
sales: 17 million
Market share: 3.9%

5)

ZTE:
sales: 15.2 million
Market share: 3.5%

6)

HUAWEI:
sales: 11.2 million
Market share: 2.6%

7)

LENOVO
sales: 11 million
Market share: 2.5%

8)

TCL
sales: 10.13 million
Market share: 2.3%

9)

SONY:
sales: 9.5 million
Market share: 2.2%

10)

BLACK BERRY:

sales: 9.4 million

Market share: 1.8%

f. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The Primary Objective was to study the perception & buying behavior of students towards
various mobile brands.
The Secondary Objectives of this study were to identify:

To know about the student preference level associated with different mobile phones.

To find out the students satisfaction towards the various mobile phones.

Major features, which a customer looks for in a mobile before making a purchase.

Factors that influence decision-making in purchasing a mobile phone.

To know which advertisement media puts more impact on the buying decision of
students.

Factors, which help in increasing the sale of mobile phones.

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
a. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY:
Sample Size 100 respondents
Sample Unit- Students of Integrated and the Post Graduation have been taken as sample unit.
Sampling Area University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.
Sampling Technique - Random Sampling technique

b. RESEARCH DESI GN:

Visited the students in the University & gathered information required as per the
questionnaire.

The research design is probability research design and is descriptive research.

c. DATA COLLECTION:
Primary data has been used by me in the form of Questionnaire & Observation,
which are the two basic methods of collecting primary data, which suffices all
research objectives.
Secondary data sources like catalogue of the company, product range book of the company &
various internet sites such as [Link], [Link], [Link] & [Link] have been
used.

3. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Q-1 Sex ratio of the respondents
Table Number - 1
PARTICULARS

NUMBER

%AGE

MALE

41

41%

FEMALE

59

59%

Interpretation:
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of the 100
Respondents,
41 were male and 59 were female.

Q.2- occupation of the Respondents Family

Table Number 2
PARTICULARS

NUMBER

%AGE

Service

109

43.6

Professional

34

13.6

Business

76

30.4

Others

31

12.4

Total

250

100

120
100
80
60
40

N
u
m
be
r
of
th
e
R
es
po
nd
en
ts
Perc
enta
ge of
the
Resp
onde
nts

20
0
Service Professional

Business Others

Interpretation
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of the 250
respondents,
109 respondents belong to the service family, 76 were from business, 34
were from
the professional and 31 were from the others family.

Q- 3 Income level of the respondents family

Table Number- 3
PARTICULARS

NUMBER

%AGE

Less than 15,000

101

40.4

15,001-25,000

61

24.4

25,001-35,000

52

20.8

35001 & above

36

14.4

250

100

Total

120
100
80

Number of the Respondents

60
the

Percentage of
Respondents

40

20
0
Les
s
than
15,
00
0

15,
001
25,
000

25,
001
35,
000

35,001 &
above

Interpretation

The graphical representation of the table shows that out of the 250
respondents,

101 respondents were from the family whose income is less than
15,000, 61
respondents were from the family whose income is between the
15,001 25,000, 52 respondents were from the family whose
income is between 25,001- 35,000 and rest were from the
family whose income is above 35,001.

Q-4. Educational Backgroud of the Respondents parents

Table Number- 4
PARTICULARS

NUMBER

%AGE

High school

34

13.6

Intermediate

23

9.2

Graduate

89

35.6

Post graduate

98

39.6

Other

2.4

Total

250

100

120
100
80
60
40

N
u
m
be
r
of
th
e
R
es
po
nd
en
ts
Perc
enta
ge of
the
Resp
onde

ts
20
0

Interpretation:
The graphical representation shows that out of the 250
respondents, 98
respondents parents are post graduate, 89 respondents parents are
graduate, 34
respondents parents are high school, 23 are intermediate and rest
have others
educational background.

Q-5 - Which mobile phone you are using?

Table No. 5
[Link]
1

Name of the Mobile

Number of the

Percentage of

Phones

Respondents

Respondents

Apple

Nokia

Samsung

Sony Ericson

LG

Motorola

Others
Total

Number of the Respondents with

Various Mobile Phones
18
0
16
0
14
0
120
respondents 100
80
Percentage of 60
Respondents
4
0
2

No of the

0
0

Interpretation
Out of the 250 respondents, 155 are using the Nokia phones, 34 are using the Sony
Ericson, 6 are using the Sumsung, 22 are using the LG, 22 are using the Motorola
and 11 are using the Others.

Q.6 - How long you are using the mobile phones?

Table No.- 6
[Link]

Time Period of using

Number of the

Percentage of

the mobile phones

Respondents

Respondents

Less than 1 year

48

19.2

1-2 years

75

30

2-4 years

56

22.4

Above 4 years

71

28.4

250

100.0

Total

Number of the Respondents on the basis of usage time period

8

0 10

7
0
6
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2

Less than 1 1-2 year

year

of the
Respondents
Percentage of
N

the

Respondents

m
b
er
2-4year

Above 4 year

Interpretation
Out of the 250 respondents 48 are using for less than year, 75 are using
for 12years, 56 are using for 2-4 years, 71 are using for above 4 years.

Q.7- How often do you change your mobile phone?

Table No.- 7

[Link]

Frequency of

Number of the

Percentage of

changing the mobile

Respondents

Respondents

phones
1

Less than 1 year

59

23.6

1-2 years

88

35.2

2-4 years

43

17.4

Above 4 years

60

24

250

100.0

Total

Number of the Respondents on the basis of

frequency of changing the mobile phones
1
0
0
9
0
8
0
7
0
6
0
5
0
4
0
3

0 20 10 0
Less than 1 1-2 year
year

r of the
Respondents
N

Percentage of

the

Respondents

b
e
2-4year Above 4 year

Interpretation
Out of the 250 respondents 59 are using for less than year, 88 are using
for 12years, 48 are using for 2-4 years, 60 are using for above 4 years.

Q.8 What will you be willing to pay for a mobile phone by respondents.
Table Number- 8
PARTICULARS

NUMBER

%AGE

Less than 10,000

142

56.8

10,000 to 20,000

86

34.4

20,001 to 40,000

15

Any amount

2.8

Total

250

100

160
140
120
Num
ber
of
the
Resp
onde
nts

100
80
60
40
20
0
Les
s
than
10,
00
0

10,0
0120,0
00

20,001any
40,000

Percent
age of
the
Respon
dents

amount

Interpretation:
The graphical representation shows that out of the 250
respondents, 142
respondents were willing to spend less than 10,000, 86 were willing
to spend

between 10,001 to 20,000, 15 were willing to pay betweem 20,001 to

40,000 and
rest were ready to pay any amount.

Q-9 . Consider the TV advertisement you like most what brand is it

promoting by respondents.
Table Number- 9
PARTICULARS

NUMBER

%AGE

Nokia

122

48.8

Samsung

43

17.2

Sony Ericson

42

16.8

LG

11

4.4

Motorola

24

9.6

Iphone

.8

Blackberry

1.6

Other

.8

250

100

Total
140
120
100
80
60
of the 40

Number of the
Respondents
Percentage
Respondents

20
0

Interpretation:
Out of the 250 respondents, 122 like the Nokia advertisement most, 43 like the
samsung, 42 like the Sony Ericson, 24 like the Motorola, 11 like the LG and rest like
others.

4. CHI- SQUARE ANALYSIS

Chi- square analysis on the relationship between gender and time

period of usage the mobile phone.
GENDER

LESS THEN 1-2 YEAR

2-4 YEAR

1 YEAR

ABOVE 4 Total
YEAR

MALE

23

38

32

45

138

FEMALE

25

36

25

26

112

TOTAL

48

74

57

71

250

Ho; there is no significant relationship between the gender and time period of using
the mobile phone.
H1; there is a significant relationship between the gender and time period of using
the mobile phone.
O

23

26.5

12.25

.462

25

40.8

7.84

.192

38

31.4

.36

.011

36

39.2

33.64

.858

32

21.5

12.25

.570

25

33.2

7.84

.236

45

25.5

.25

.009

26

31.9

34.81

1.091

3.429

X2 = (O-E)2 / E = 3.429
Number of degree of freedom:

(O-E)2

(O-E)2/E

ndf = (row-1) (column 1)

= (2-1) (4-1)
=3
Table value of x2 at 1% level of significant = 7.78
Conclusion
Thus calculated X is less than the tabulated X . X calculated =3.429<X square=7.78.
So we will accept null hypothesis that is there is no difference significance
relationship between gender and time period of change the mobile phones.
CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
INCOME AND SPENDING ON MOBILE PHONES
Income

Less than

10,000

10,000-

20,000-

40,000 &

20,000

40,000

above

Total

Spendi
Less

66

27

101

than
15,000
15,000

35

23

61

25,000
25,000

29

20

52

35,000
35,000 &

10

18

36

above
Total

140

88

15

250

Ho; There is no significant relationship between the income and spending on the
mobile phones.
Ha; There is a significant relationship between the income and spending on the
mobile phones.

(O-E)2

(O-E)2/E

66

56.66

89.11

1.57

35
29
10

34.16
29.12
20.16

.70
.01
103.2

.02
.00
5.11

27
23

35.55
21.47

73.10
2.34

2.05
.11

20

18.30

2.89

.16

18
4
3

12.67
6.06
3.66

28.40
4.24
.435

2.24
.70
.12

1
7
4

3.12
2.16
2.82

4.49
23.42
1.39

1-44
10.84
.50

1.70
1.45

2.89
.30

1.7
.21

0
E

0
26.77

X2 = (O-E)2 / E = 26.77
Number of degree of freedom:
ndf = (row-1) (column 1)
= (4-1) (4-1)
=9
Table value of x2 at 1% level of significant = 14.7
Conclusion:
HO is rejected since the calculated value of x2 (26.77) more than the table value of
x2 (12.59) hence there is a significant relationship between income and
spending on mobile phones.

CHI-SQUARE

ANALYSIS

ON

THE

RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN Gender AND Frequency of changing the

MOBILE PHONES
GENDER

LESS THEN 1-2 YEAR

2-4 YEAR

ABOVE 4 Total

1 YEAR

YEAR

MALE

38

45

23

33

139

FEMALE

21

43

20

27

111

TOTAL

59

88

43

60

250

Ho; There is no significant relationship between the income and frequency of

changing the mobile phones.
Ha; There is a significant relationship between the income and frequency of
changing the mobile phones.
O

38

32.80

27.04

.82

45

48.92

15.36

.31

23

23.90

.04

33

33.36

.13

.00

21

26.20

27.04

1.03

43

39.07

15.44

.40

20

19.09

.82

,04

27

26.64

.13

.00

2.64

X2 = (O-E)2 / E = 2.64
Number of degree of freedom:
ndf = (row-1) (column 1)
= (2-1) (4-1)
=3

(O-E)2

(O-E)2/E

Table value of x2 at 1% level of significant = 7.78

Conclusion:
HO is accepted since the calculated value of x2 (2.64) less than the table value of x2
(7.78) hence there is no significant relationship between gender and frequency of
changing the mobile phones.

5. FINDINGS

Nokia is the most favorite brand of the college student.

35% student change their mobile phones within 1to2 years
30% students are using the mobile phones since last 1 to 2 years.
51% students are ready to pay for a mobile phone less than 10,000 and
they spend according to their family income.
49% students like the Nokia advertisement most.
Mostly students use the mobile phones for talking, SMS and for using
the GPRS function.
Mostly students have handsfree, bloothooth and memory card.
Almost all students are aware about the GPRS, Blootooth and MMS
service but least students are aware about the 3G function.
Most favourite brand among the college students is Nokia and the
least favorite brand is LG.
Appearance, Price, Brand Image and advertisement are the important
factors for the students while purchasing mobile phones.
Mostly students prefer slim, medium in weight and large in size handset
Mostly students see advertisement on television
Story, spokesperson and the music are the important factor in advertisement
Mostly students have the hanging and service problem with the Nokia.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS
Nokia should provide better service and try to solve the hanging problem
Cellular companies should increase the awareness about the 3G service.
Companies should offer more range of Rs. 10,000 or less than 10,000.
LG and Samsung should try to expand its market share and also should try to
increase the awareness through the television advertisement.
All companies should increase their distribution channel.
The companies should continue to work on the Strategy of T.Q.M (Total
Quality Management)
Consumers do not get satisfied with the promotional policies of the
companies. New techniques of promotion is required to create awareness
about the entire range of companies products.

7. LIMITATIONS

A small sample size of 250 students is taken, so we can not draw inferences
about the population from this sample size.
Time period is short and resource constraints.
The scope of the project is limited to the city of Ghaziabad. So, we cannot say
that the same response will exist throughout India.
This study is based on the prevailing students satisfaction. But the students
satisfaction may change according to time, fashion, technology, development,
etc.

8. BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS:

MARKETING
MANAGEMENT -

V.S. Ramaswamy,
[Link]

[Link]
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY Vittal
OPERATION RESEARCH
-

Web Resources:

[Link]
http ://[Link]/t -aboutus-ttsl-organization. aspx
[Link] .in/webapp/Aboutus/[Link]
http ://[Link]/[Link]? nfpb=true&pageLabel=LG Page
AboutLG
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]

9. ANNEXURE

Questionnaire

Section A: Personal Informations

1. Name:
2.(a) Age:
(b) Gender
Male

Female

3. Occupation of Father
Service
Professional
Business
Others
Specify
4. Income Level (per month)
Less than 15,000
15,001 25,000
25,001 35,000
35,001 & above

5. Educational Background ( Parents)

High School
Intermediate
Graduate
Post Graduate
If Other
Specify

Section B: About mobile phones

6) Which mobile phone you are using.
A) Nokia

C) Sony Ericson
E) Motorola

G)
Blackberry

B) Samsung
D) LG

F) iPhone
H) Others
Specify

7) Please write the model of your phone

ple: Nokia 1100, Ericson k800i, etc.)

8) How long you are using the mobile phone

 Less than 1
year 1 2 years
2 4 years
Above 4 years
9) What are the reasons for using the above mentioned model.
A) WAP

B) Just to talk on it

C) Use GPRS function

D) Receive Email & SMS

E) Down Load Files

F) Others (Specify

10) How often do you change your mobile

phone Less than 1 year
1 2 years
2 4 years
Above

years
11) What phone Accessories do you have?

A) Handsfree
B) Bloothooth Head Set
C) USB Data Cable

D) Memory Card (SD Card)

E) Others(Specify

12) Latest Mobile facilities which you are aware of:(Can tick multiple boxes of the facilities you know.)
A) GPRS

B)

3G

C)

MMS

D)

BLOOTOOTH

E)

INFRARED

F)

VIDEO

CALL

G) OTHER FACILITIES (Specify)

13) What is your favourite brand in Mobiles?

(Please choose your 3 favorite brands in order of preference from the brands in
the table below. 1-most favorite,
3-least favorite.)
1

A) Nokia

B) Samsung

C
)

Sony Ericson

D)

LG

E)

G)

Motorola
Blackberry

H) Others
Specify the brand.

14) Why you like the brands you chose above?(Please indicate the important of
below
factors when you choose the brands. 1-very important, 2-somewhat important, 3-neither
important
nor unimportant, 4-less important, 5- unimportant.)
1
A) Advertisement

B) Appearance
C) Price
D)
Functions
E)
Quality
F)
Brand Image

G) Service
Recommended by friends

H)

I) Others

Specify.

15) Do you prefer phones to be

Slim or medium or thick
Light or medium or heavy
Small or medium or large

16) What would you be willing to pay for a mobile

phone Less than 10,000
10,001

to

20,000

20,001

to

40,000

Any

amount(

Specify

17) Where did you often see the mobile advertisement?

A) TV

B) News Paper

D) Online

C) Magazine

F) Radio

E) Outdoor

G) Leaflets

H) Others
(specify

18) Consider the TV advertisement you like what brand is it promoting

A) Nokia
C) Sony
Ericson

B) Samsung

D) LG

F) iPhone

E)
Motorola
G) Blackberry

H) Others

Specify

19) Which of the following would impress you the most?

(Please indicate the important of below factors when you
choose the brands. 1-very important, 2-somewhat important, 3neither important nor unimportant, 4-less important, 5unimportant.)

Slogan
B.
Picture
C
. Color
D
. Story
E.
Spokesperson
F. Music

3
A.

 G.
Others
H. Recommended by
Friends
I.

Others

(Specify)

20.) Are there any general comments you would make about what you
like/dislike about mobile phones? (This could be pricing, location of
sales, reception, colour, memory, or anything else.)