Ta
Age Frequenc Percentag
bl y e e
50 years old and above 5 10%
1. 40-49 8 16%
30-39 7 14%
20-29 18 36%
Below 20 years old 12 24%
Total 50 100%
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents Profile
when grouped according to Age.
Table 1 presents Frequency and Percentage Distribution of
Respondents Profile when grouped according to Age.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 5 or 10 % are in the
age bracket of 50 years old and above. This is closely followed
by those in the age bracket of 40-49, having a frequency of 8 or
16% of the respondents. Next, are at the age of 30-39, with a
frequency of 7, representing the 14% of the respondents. There
are 18 or 36% are in the age bracket of 20-29 while 12 or 24%
aging below 20 years old.
Table 2. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Profile when grouped according to Gender.
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 23 46%
Female 27 54%
Total 50 100%
Table 2 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents Profile when grouped according to Gender.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 23 or 46% are in male
and the other 27 or 54% are female.
Table 3. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Profile when grouped according to Civil Status.
Civil Status Frequency Percentage
Single 29 58%
Married 20 40%
Separated 1 2%
Total 50 100%
Table 3 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents Profile when grouped according to Civil Status.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 29 or 58% are single.
This is followed by 20 or 40% married respondents. Then, there is
1 or 2% who is separated.
Table 4. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Profile when grouped according to Educational Attainment.
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage
Elementary 3 6%
High School 19 38%
College 26 52%
Post-Graduate 2 4%
Total 50 100%
Table 4 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents Profile when grouped according to Educational
Attainment.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 3 or 6% are elementary
graduates. It is followed by 19 or 38% of the respondents who
attained High School level. Then, 26 or 52% of the respondents
are College graduates and 2 or 4% have attained Post-Graduate
level.
Table 5. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Profile when grouped according to Salary Bracket.
Salary Bracket Frequency Percentage
21,000 and above 8 32%
16,000-20,000 6 24%
11,000-15,000 4 16%
6,000-10,000 6 24%
5,000 and below 1 4%
Total 25 100%
Table 5 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents Profile when grouped according to Salary Bracket.
It shows that of the 25 respondents, 8 or 32% have a salary
bracket of 21,000 and above. It is closely followed by those who
have salary bracket of 16,000-20,000, having a frequency of 6 or
24% of the respondents. Next, those who have a salary bracket of
11,000-15,000, with a frequency of 4 or 16% of the respondents.
There are 6 or 24% having a salary bracket of 6,000-10,000 while
1 or 4% has a salary of 5,000 below.
Table 6. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Profile when grouped according to Health Status.
Health Status Frequency Percentage
Underweight 10 20%
Healthy 36 72%
Overweight 4 8%
Total 50 100%
Table 6 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents Profile when grouped according to Health Status.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 10 or 20% are
underweight. Those who are healthy have a frequency of 36
representing the 72% of the respondents. There are 4 or 8% who
are obese.
Table 7. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents who
have eaten Pawa.
Have they eaten Pawa? Frequency Percentage
Yes 50 100%
No 0 0%
Total 50 100%
Table 7 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents who have eaten Pawa.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 50 or 100% have eaten
Pawa.
Table 8. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of how often the
Respondents eat Pawa.
Phase Frequency Percentage
Always 1 2%
Often 10 20%
Occasionally 19 38%
Rarely 20 40%
Total 50 100%
Table 8 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of how often the Respondents eat Pawa.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 1 or 2% always eat
Pawa. Next to it is having a frequency of 10 representing the20%
that just often eat Pawa. There are 19 or 38% who occasionally
eat Pawa while 20 or 40% rarely eat Pawa.
Table 9. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents who
prefer a variation on Pawa.
Answer Frequency Percentage
Yes 47 94%
No 3 6%
Total 50 100%
Table 9 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents who prefer a variation of Pawa.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 47 or 94% prefer a
variation of Pawa and 3 or 6% does not want a variation of Pawa.
Table 10. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Preferred
Flavors of Pawa.
Preferred Flavors Frequency Percentage
Chocolate 34 68%
Ube 29 58%
Mango 12 24%
Other flavors 17 34%
Table 10 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Preferred Flavors of Pawa.
It shows that of 47 respondents who want a variation of
Pawa, 34 or 68% prefer Chocolate. The 29 or 58% of the
respondents also prefer the Ube flavor. Mango flavor is also
preferred by respondents, having a frequency of 19, representing
the 38% of respondents. There are 8 or 16% who prefer other
flavors such as Cheese, Strawberry, Buko, Pandan and Monggo.
Table 11. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Satisfaction on the Product.
Satisfaction Level Frequency Percentage
Very Much 10 20%
Much 27 54%
Not Much 13 26%
Not at All 0 0%
Total 50 100%
Table 11 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Respondents Satisfaction on the Product.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 10 or 20% are very much
satisfied with the product. The respondents who are much
satisfied with the product, have a frequency of 27, representing
the 54% of respondents while 13 or 26% are not much satisfied
with the product.
Table 12. Frequency and Percentage Distribution about the flavors
complementing each other.
Answers Frequency Percentage
Yes 42 84%
No 8 16%
Total 50 100%
Table 12 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
about the flavors complementing each other.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 42 or 84% agree that
the flavors are complementing each other while there are 8 or 16%
who disagree.
Table 13. Frequency and Percentage Distribution about the
recommendation of the product to the family and friends of the
respondents.
Answers Frequency Percentage
Yes 44 88%
No 6 12%
Total 50 100%
Table 13 present the Frequency and Percentage Distribution about
the recommendation of the product to the family and friends of
the respondents.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 44 or 88% said that
they will recommend the product to their family and friends while
6 or 12% said that they will not do the same.
Table 14. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Satisfaction
in the price of the product.
Answers Frequency Percentage
Yes 42 84%
No 8 16%
Total 50 100%
Table 14 present the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Satisfaction in the price of the product.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 42 or 84% are satisfied
with the price of the product while 8 or 16% are not.
Table 15. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Price that
respondents are willing to pay.
Price Frequency Percentage
Above 25 0 0%
25-16 35 70%
Below 16 15 30%
Total 50 100%
Table 15 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution of
Price that respondents are willing to pay.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 35 or 70% are willing
to pay 25-16 pesos for the product and 15 or 30% are willing to
pay below 16.
Table 16. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Price that
Product would look cheap.
Price Frequency Percentage
Above 25 0 0%
25-21 2 4%
20-16 2 4%
Below 16 46 92%
Total 50 100%
Table 16 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Price that Product would look cheap.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 2 or 4% said that
having a price of 25-21 would make it look cheap. The same number
of frequency with 4% representing the respondents said that 20-16
would make it look cheap. The majority having a frequency of 46
or 92% of the respondents said that having a price of below 16
would make it look cheap.
Table 17. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Price that
Product would look expensive.
Price Frequency Percentage
Above 25 40 80%
25-21 7 14%
20-16 3 6%
Total 50 100%
Table 17 presents the Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of Price that Product would look expensive.
It shows that of the 50 respondents, 40 or 80% said that
having a price of above 25 would make it look expensive. It is
followed by 7 or 14% of the respondents who said a price of 25-21
would make it look expensive while there are 3 or 6% who said
that 20-16 would already make it look expensive.
