0% found this document useful (0 votes)
190 views8 pages

Hydraulic Profile - Rev. 1.1

This document provides design parameters for a wastewater treatment plant including flowrates, ratios, and elevations for various components in both summer and winter scenarios. It includes details on the inlet piping, coarse screening, and inlet pumping pit such as pipe diameters, screen specifications, water depths and elevations.

Uploaded by

unconformist
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
190 views8 pages

Hydraulic Profile - Rev. 1.1

This document provides design parameters for a wastewater treatment plant including flowrates, ratios, and elevations for various components in both summer and winter scenarios. It includes details on the inlet piping, coarse screening, and inlet pumping pit such as pipe diameters, screen specifications, water depths and elevations.

Uploaded by

unconformist
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Parameter Unit Value

Scenario Summer Winter


0.1 Flowrates
m3/d 5000 5000
Influent flowrate
3 208,3 208,3
m /h
Mechanical pre-treatments - 1,60 1,60
Peak factor
Biological treatments - 1,10 1,10
3 250 250
m /d
Internal wastewater line 3
m /h 10,4 10,4
Ratio - 5,00 5,00
RAS (Return Activated Sludge) 3 27500 27500
m /d
Flowrate
m3/h 1145,8 1145,8
Ratio - 3,38 4,83
IMLR (Internal Mixed-Liquor Recycle) 3
m /d 18604 26577
Aerobic to anoxic stage Flowrate
3 775,2 1107,4
m /h
Ratio - 2,00 1,70
IMLR (Internal Mixed-Liquor Recycle) 3
m /d 11000 9350
Anoxic to anaerobic stage Flowrate
3 458,3 389,6
m /h
3 104
Membrane filtration tank drainage flowrate m /d
m3/h 104,0
3 -
Membrane soaking tank drainage flowrate m /d
3 41,6
m /h
Sludge dewatering drainage flowrate m3/d 123
3 21,5
m /h
0.2 Elevation data
Reference m 34,300
0.3 WWTP layout
Coarse screening - 1
Inlet pumping - 1
Grit removal - 2
Fine screening - 2
Number of lanes Biological treatments - 2
Membrane filtration - 2
Permeate holding - 1
Membrane soaking - 1
Sludge dewatering - 1
Parameter Unit Value
Scenario Summer Winter
1.1 Inlet piping
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate 3 333,3 333,3
m /h
Slope - 0,50%
Strickler coefficient 1/3 110
m /s
Filling degree - 50% 50%
Wetted angle rad 3,14 3,14
F coefficient - 0,16 0,16
Calculated mm 381,2 381,2
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 470,8
Material - PVC
Pipe Pressure - PN 8
Diameter mm OD 500
Effective F coefficient value - 0,09 0,09
Effective filling degree value - 37% 37%
Effective wetted angle value rad 2,61 2,61
Effective average flow value m/s 1,61 1,61
Elevation of the bottom of the pipe Final section m 26,800
Elevation of the free surface Final section m 26,940 26,940
1.2 Coarse screening
Design flowrate m3/h 333,3 333,3
Width of channel m 0,50
Length of channel m 6,00
Slope of channel - 0,50%
Strickler coefficient of channel m1/3/s 75
Water depth of channel m 0,163 0,163
Water depth in front of the screen m 0,215 0,215
Flow velocity in front of the screen m/sec 0,86 0,86
Distance between bars mm 15
Width of bars mm 10
Screen inclination 75
Shape coefficient of bars - 2,42
Distance of the upstream screening section from the inlet m 2,00
Head losses trough the screen m 0,051 0,051
Critical water level m 0,120 0,120
Initial section m 26,500
Elevation of the bottom of the channel Screening section m 26,490
Final section m 26,470
Initial section m 26,663 26,663
Upstream screening section m 26,705 26,705
Elevation of the free surface
Downstream screening section m 26,653 26,653
Final section m 26,590 26,590
1.3 Inlet pumping pit
Design flowrate m3/h 343,8 343,8
Maximum water level m 0,500 0,500
Minimum water level m 0,900 0,900
Elevation of the bottom of the pit m 25,500
1.4 Piping from grit removal to fine screening
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate m3/h 171,9 171,9
Design average speed m/s 0,60
Calculated mm 318,3 318,3
Minimum internal diameter
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 309,7
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 300
Effective average flow m/s 0,63 0,63
Length m 10,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,001 0,001
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 5
Elbow 45 - 1
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 0,076 0,076
1.5 Fine screening
Design flowrate m3/h 171,9 171,9
Drum diameter m 1,00
Drum length m 2,00
Filling degree - 60%
Wetted angle rad 3,54
Active drum surface m2 3,54
Discharge coefficient - 0,70
Head losses trough the screen m 0,000 0,000
1.6 Piping from to fine screening anaerobic stage
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate 3 171,9 171,9
m /h
Design average speed m/s 0,60
Calculated mm 318,3 318,3
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 309,7
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 300
Effective average flow m/s 0,63 0,63
Length m 8,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,001 0,001
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 1
Elbow 45 - 2
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 0,052 0,052
1.7 Pre-treatments bypass piping
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate 3 333,3 333,3
m /h
Slope - 0,10%
Strickler coefficient 1/3 110
m /s
Filling degree - 70% 70%
Wetted angle rad 3,96 3,96
F coefficient - 0,26 0,26
Calculated mm 424,9 424,9
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 470,8
Material - PVC
Pipe Pressure - PN 8
Diameter mm OD 500
Effective F coefficient value - 0,20 0,20
Effective filling degree value - 58% 58%
Effective wetted angle value rad 3,45 3,45
Effective average flow value m/s 0,89 0,89
Length of the pipe m 55,00
Initial section m 26,400
Elevation of the bottom of the pipe
Final section m 26,345
Initial section m 26,645 26,645
Elevation of the free surface
Final section m 26,590 26,590
Parameter Unit Value
Scenario Summer Winter
2.1 Distribution channel
Design influent flowrate m3/h 171,9 171,9
Design bypassed flowrate 3 57,3 57,3
m /h
Design effluent flowrate m3/h 114,6 114,6
Width of channel m 0,60
Length of channel m 7,00
Slope of channel - 0,05%
Strickler coefficient of channel 1/3 75
m /s
Initial section m 37,185
Elevation of the bottom of the channel Downstream the overflow discharge m 37,183 37,183
Final section m 37,181
Initial section m 37,322 37,322
Water level inside the channel Downstream the overflow discharge m 37,331 37,331
Final section m 37,329 37,329
2.2 Excess influent flowrate overflow
Overflow heigth m 0,120 0,120
Downstream water level m 0,148 0,148
Downstream specific energy m 0,154 0,154
Critical flowrate 3 223,3 223,3
m /h
Check - Ok Ok
Upstream water level - 0,137 0,137
Flow coefficient - 0,40
Overflow length m 2,64 2,64
2.3 Discharge from distribution channel to anaerobic stage
Width of discharge m 1,00
Water level at the discharge section m 0,047 0,047
Minimum water free fall m 0,200 0,200
2.4 Anaerobic stage
Elevation of the bottom of the tank m 31,080
Water level inside the tank m 37,082 37,082
2.5 Connection from anaerobic to anoxic stage
Design flowrate 3 343,8 309,4
m /h
Width of connection m 1,00
Height of connection m 1,00
Area of connection m2 1,00
Flow coefficient - 0,616
Head losses trough the connection m 0,001 0,001
2.6 Anoxic stage
Elevation of the bottom of the tank m 31,080
Water level inside the tank m 37,081 37,081
2.7 Connection from anoxic to aerobic stage
Design flowrate m3/h 502,2 668,3
Width of connection m 2,00
Height of connection m 1,00
Area of connection m2 2,00
Flow coefficient - 0,616
Head losses trough the connection m 0,001 0,001
2.8 Aerobic stage
Elevation of the bottom of the tank m 31,080
Design water depth m 6,00 6,00
Water level inside the tank m 37,080 37,080
2.9 Discharge from anoxic stage to membrane loading pumping pit
Design flowrate 3 687,5 687,5
m /h
Width of discharge m 2,00
Water level at the discharge section m 0,098 0,098
2.10 Membrane loading pumping pit
Minimum water free fall m 0,200 0,200
Water level inside the tank m 36,782 36,782
2.11 Membrane filtration stage
Elevation of the bottom of the tank m 34,028
Design water depth m 3,20 3,20
Water level inside the tank m 37,228 37,228
2.7 RAS piping
Number of parallel pipes - 3
Design flowrate 3 191,0 191,0
m /h
Design average speed m/s 1,20
Calculated mm 237,2 237,2
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 260,4
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 250
Effective average flow m/s 1,00 1,00
Length m 8,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,004 0,004
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 3
Elbow 45 - 0
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 0,148 0,148
2.8 Permeate holding tank discharge
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate 3 229,2 229,2
m /h
Design average speed m/s 1,20
Calculated mm 259,9 259,9
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 260,4
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 250
Effective average flow m/s 1,20 1,20
Length m 75,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,005 0,005
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 3
Elbow 45 - 0
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Minor head losses

Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 0,542 0,542
2.9 Secondary treatments bypass piping
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate 3 114,6 114,6
m /h
Design average speed m/s 1,20
Calculated mm 183,8 183,8
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 260,4
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 250
Effective average flow m/s 0,60 0,60
Length m 80,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,001 0,001
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 3
Elbow 45 - 0
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 0,152 0,152
2.10 Membrane filtration drain piping
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate m3/h 104,0
Design average speed m/s 1,20
Calculated mm 175,1
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 159,3
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 150
Effective average flow m/s 1,45
Length m 70,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,012
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 4
Elbow 45 - 0
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 1
Total head losses m 1,181
Parameter Unit Value
Scenario Summer Winter
3.1 Membrane soaking drain piping
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate 3 41,6
m /h
Design average speed m/s 1,20
Calculated mm 110,7
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 107,1
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 100
Effective average flow m/s 1,28
Length m 70,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,016
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 3
Elbow 45 - 0
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 1,309
3.2 Sludge dewatering drain piping
Number of parallel pipes - 1
Design flowrate m3/h 21,5
Design average speed m/s 1,20
Calculated mm 79,6
Minimum internal diameter
Chosen mm 107,1
Material - SS AISI 304
Pipe Pressure - -
Diameter mm DN 100
Effective average flow m/s 0,66
Length m 15,00
Major head losses
Roughness coefficient - 140
(Hazen-Williams formula)
Hydraulic slope m/m 0,005
Inlet - 1
Outlet - 1
Elbow 90 - 2
Elbow 45 - 0
Minor head losses Expansion - 0
Contraction - 0
Tee - 0
Butterfly valve - 0
Gate valve - 0
Total head losses m 0,117

You might also like