Advanced Techniques
of Ultrasonic Examination
Ultrasonic Examination
Level 3 (EN 473)
Advanced Techniques
of Ultrasonic Examination
Automated Ultrasonic Examination
Computer Aided Processing of Ultrasonic Data
ALOK
SAFT
TOFD
Phased Array
Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT)
Advanced Techniques
of Ultrasonic Examination
Automated Ultrasonic
Examination
Automated Ultrasonic Examination
Recording of data
Ultrasonic system
Position data by mechanical devices
• Scanning a cluster of probes along the surface
of the test object
or
• Fixed cluster of probes and moving of the test
object
Presentation of data
Correlation of the probe‘s position to the
ultrasonic data
Assembling of the
Examination Equipment
Probe 1
Triggering Control of Manipulator
Recording of Position Data
Probe n
Evaluation Presentation Processing Recording Ultrasonic
of Data of Data of Data of Data Electronic
Data
Storage
Stationary Equipment
Characteristics
stationary installed
examination of a specific assembly in production lines
high automation level
automated evaluation
high examination speed
Example
continuos in-production examination of steel products (plates,
bars, rails, tubes)
Machine for examination of objects like axel leg, rolls, screws,
balls, stud, cylinders
In-production examination of assemblies for mechanical
engineering (shaft, wheel disk)
Manufacturing inspection of objects for aerospace (composite
material, glas fiber reinforced plasticsre, carbon fiber reinforced
plastics)
In-process controlling (random test)
Mobile Equipment
Characteristics
not tied to a certain place
mostly applicable for variable examinations
• configure by adapting or exchange of assemblies
Example
Basic inspection and in-service inspection of components
• power plants
• chemical plants
• pipelines
Basic inspection and in-service inspection of means of
transportation
• air
• rail
ALOK
Response Locus of
Amplitude and Travel
Time
ALOK
Response Locus of Amplitude and Travel Time
Signal processing which allows the detection of all echo
maxima appearing in the HF signal without limitated by
using a travel time monitor
Resolution of reflectors being one near to the other
Recording of every maxima detected within the A-scan by
amplitude
and
travel time
Correlation of the reflector‘s position to its maximum
Principle
HF Presentation
amplitude
travel time response locus
travel time
amplitude
response locus
Processing of Signals
rectified A-scan (half-wave presentation)
dejamed and non-densified data
amplitude
A3 A4
A1 A5
A2
trevel time
AM
filter function
-6dB AM-2 < AM
rise time [half-wave]: i = 2 AM-1 ≤ AM
AM/2
decay time [half-wave]: k=3 AM+1 ≤ AM
AM+2 ≤ AM
AM+3 ≤ AM
rectified A-scan (half-wave presentation)
dejamed and pre-densified data
amplitude
A3 A4
A1 A5
A2
travel time
Signal Processing
Storage of raw data
recorded and pre-densified data were stored as couple
maximum amplitude – travel time
recording of position data via movement of manipulator
axis and position of the probes in the cluster
Multi-channel system requires complete signal
processing and storage of the raw data for each
channel
simultanously application of many probes and beam
angles
increase of examination speed und detectivity
Detection of all relevant echo signals of the
A-scan in spite of dat reduction
Resolution
Signal identification by means of i,k-filter
Signal identification parameter k defines the resolution of
neighbouring echo signals in the A-scan
When detecting an echo signal the next can be identified
after a distance of k+1 half-waves
λ
R = (k + 1) ⋅
2
Resolution depends on
decay of the signals (characteristic of the probe)
wave length
Interfering Amplitudes
stochastic
noise
interfering
interfering signal signal
stochastic noise
rough interface
echos due to geometrical shape
Signal Pattern Identification
response locus interfering signals and stochastic
amplitude
of amplitudes noise
no dynamic in travel time
isolated points in response locus of
travel time
echos from interfaces and
geometric shape
dynamic in travel time, but the rise
time is not characteristic for the
technique
reduction of data
travel time
response locus prerequisite for reconstruction of
of travel time the reflector
up to 90%
Presentation of the Data
Calculation of elements of the image for each
data set (position of the element)
travel time
beam angle
sound velocity
Presentation of amplitude height
coloured presentation according to their echo height for
each element
Presentation of the Data
C-Scan y
x
lack of fusion
pore
x y
B-Scan D-Scan
z
Presentation as Response Locus
Response locus of travel Response locus of amplitudes
time amplitude vis probe position
travel time vis probe of one scan path
position of one scan path
travel time
amplitude
probe position x probe position x
Triangulation
¾ complete description of the reflector
by surrounded sampling
z Examination with different beam
angles
z Scanning from opposite directions
z direct scanning and scanning after
skip distance
interface of the defect to
analyze is positioned on the
arc originated by different
probe positions
Abstract
Detection independent on travel time monitor
Digitalizing of the HF-signal
Signal identification by i,k-filters
Data reduction by identification of dynamic pattern
(characteristic incline of the response locus of the travel
time)
non-sensitive for noise and default signals
applicable for multi-channel examination
high examination speed
Computer Aided Processing of
Ultrasonic Data
Synthetic Aperture Focusing
Technique
SAFT
Basics
Imagining Technique
Analyzing technique of material defects
detected by searching technique
Determination of type, location, and dimensions of
defects is prerequisite for evaluating construction saftys
Developing of SAFT
based on RADAR technique (70th)
developed continuously to 3D-SAFT Algorithm
Resolution of Ultrasonic Examination
Good resolution when detailed description
of materail defects required
Axiale resolution determined by length of the
pulse
• use of high dampend probes
Lateral resolution determined by width of the
sound beam at the location of the defect
which has to be analyzed
• use of focussed sound beam
Focussing of Sound Beam
Optimized near field length by standardized
probes
Focussing probes with lenses of perspex
Phased array probes with electronically
controlled focus distance
Synthetic aperture
Standard Probes
D
Optimized field of
application in a distance
to the defect according
to the near field length
near field length
Focussed Probes
D
Point- or linear focussed
Focussing length possible
only in the range of near
field length of the
appropriated probe with
same diameter and
frequency
Probes for long distances
focus
have a large diameter
Range of long distances
need more than one probe
near field length
Phased Array
D
Electronic controlled focus
distance
Focussing length possible only
in the range of near field
length of the appropriated
probe with same diameter
probes for long distances have
a large diameter
sequential Coupling specially on curved
focussing
surfaces difficult or impossible
in all depth
location Range of long depth needs
only one probe
near fiel length
Synthetic Aperture Simulation of a large probe by
moving a probe with a very
D‘ small diameter D along the
D distance D‘ (aperture)
Near field length is given by
aperture and frequency
Ultrasonic signals detected along
the distance D‘ are recorded,
stored, processed in the
computer, and calculated to the
respective volume
simultanious By re-construction algorithm a
focussing focussing can be realized
in all depth simultanous for all positions
positions between coupling surface and
near field length
Du to the use of small probes
coupling problems can be
near field length
avoided
Recording and Processing of Data
Recording and storage of the digitalized HF signal
digitalizing frequency about five times probe frequency
probe will be moved along of one ore more of one path
along the surface
digitalizing and storage of the HF signal along the
scanning path
Distance of two pulses ∆x aquivalent to half of
the wave length projected to the scanning
surface
λ ⋅ sin α
∆x <
2
4 MHz, transverse wave probe, 45° beam angle
⇒ ∆x = 0.28 mm
Beam Spread
(x, y) scanning line x
1
2
3 Beam spread as
beam spread great as possible
Ultrasonic signals of
several defects in
2 3 the beam are
1
simultanously
detected
defect are located
on the arc, the
angle is unknown
travel time t = tmax
t = t0
Reconstruction of the Reflector‘s Location
deviation of the image plane into small pixel for reconstruction
constant distance in scan direction (x-direction)
constant distance in direction perpendicular to the scan direction
(z-direction)
all pixel were seized with zero before starting reconstruction
Pixel (1,n)
Pixel (1,1)
Pixel (2,1) Pixel (2,n)
Pixel (n,n)
Pixel (n,1)
Reconstruction of the reflector‘s location
Movement of the probe is simulated in the computer
seizure of image elements with signal amplitude laying
within the beam spread
(x, y)
Averageing of the Amplitude Signal
Production of a B-scan by summarizing the amplitudes of different
probe locations
constructive interference of material areas with high amplitude
destructive interference of material areas with statistic noise signals
Simulation of a focus probe with unique focussing power along the
complete depth range
Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio by increas of examination density
Pixel (l,m)
Resolution and Accuracy of the Reconstruction
Axial resolution is given by the length of the
pulse
Lateral resolution is equal to half the probe‘s
diameter, when the aperture is long enough to
detect all signals which may be transmitted by
the reflector
Accuracy of the reflector‘s reconstruction
depends on
accuracy of sound velocity in the test object
accuracy of probe‘s delay distance
signal-to-noise ratio of the recorded ultrasound signals
recision of the manipulator
coupling fluctuation
knowledge of the test object‘s geometrie
homogeneity of the material
Aims of SAFT-Reconstruction
Determination of the defect‘s characteristics
location in depth
elongation in depth
type of defect
classification as planar or non-planar
as basis for fracture mechanic assessment
calculation
Interpretation of SAFT-Reconstruction
Restriction of interpretation due to effects of
wave dispersion and wave mode conversion
on interfaces
on the defect
L-wave
T-wave
T-wave
L-wave
L-wave
TL-LT
TLL
Geometry of the Object
Knowledge is important for interpretation of
indications
Appliance of additionally probes
e.g. image of the back wall
Mechanic and optic methods
scanning the outline of the surface
Detection of interfaces
e.g. transition between base matal and weld metal to
characterize lack of side wall fusion
Computer Aided Processing of
Ultrasonic Data
Time of Flight Defraction
Technique
TOFD
Basics
4 – 1: incidence wave
– 2: reflected wave
– 3: penetrated wave
– 4: defracted wave
1
2
4
Performance of Examination
Use of two probes scanning oposite to another
transmitter
receiver
located symmetrically to
the center of the weld
couple of probes
are moved
parallel to
the weld
seam on
one path
(non
parallel
examination)
Performance of Examination
transmitter Receiver
upper tip of
crack reflection
back wall
lower tip of
surface crack
wave
Performance of examination
Generally use of longitudinal waves
using transverse waves generates mode conversion that may
complicate the interpretation of the signals
Storage of HF signal every 1 mm on the scanning path
Digitalizing frequency equal to to higher than four times
nominal frequency of the probes
Range between
Signal of surface wave and
backwall signal
Large beam spreed
large examination volume
one couple of probes sufficient for wall thickness up to 70 mm
Performance of Examination
Maximum defraction when acoustic axis are orientated
120° one to another
setting the probe distance according to the expected depth of
the defects
Adapting to different geometries by
probe distance
probe frequency
size of transducers
Signal of defraction is low
about 20 dB to 30 dB below the level of the reflected signal
using puls-echo technique
considerable influence on the condition of the scanning
surface
no evaluation of signal height
upper crack tip
reflection of backwall
lower crack tip
surface wave
movement
of probes
travel time Evaluation
Evaluation
Examination with high sensitivity
no regording level because of size of defraction signal
does not correspond with size of defect
recording of signals from small material irregularities
recording of the weld geometry
High number of indications requires high effort
for interpretation
much experience of the personnel required
Interpretation
1
2
3 Phase of the defracted
4 signal
1. surface wave
2. upper tip (or defect with
4 not measurable depth)
2
• same phase than
1 3 signal from back wall
3. lower tip of defect
• same phase than
surface wave
4. signal of backwall
Interpretation
Defects touching the
3
4 examination surface
3. lower tip of the defect
4 4. signal from back wall
3 • also changing of the
surface signal to a
grater travel time
Interpretation
Location in depth
Calculation by difference from travel time of the surface
wave to defracted signal
Extension in depth
Calculation by the distance to the surface
calculation as difference between first and second
signal of defraction
Additional examination with other beam angles ,
frequencies or probe distances
Parallel examination
examination path parallel to scanning direction of the
probes
moving the probes perpendicular to the weld direction
Accuracy of Determination of Depth and Location
depends on
accuracy of travel time measurement
inaccurateness of sound velocity
inaccurateness of probe distance
deviation of the defect from the center line of the weld
• during non parallel examination will be assumed that the
defect is located in the center between the two probes
Limits of the Technique
Dead zone due to the surface wave (except
defects touching the surface)
Dead zone due to the back wall signal when
defects touching the surface opposite the
scanning surface
Very small irregularities (pores, inclusions) were
indicated as cracks
Signals of severe cracks may be classified as
defects without extension
weld must be accessible from both sides