0% found this document useful (1 vote)
140 views22 pages

2.4 Capacity Planning

The document discusses capacity planning techniques. It describes capacity planning as determining needed capacity levels to achieve production schedules and adjusting capacity or schedules if needed. Four common techniques are described: capacity planning factors, bill of capacity, time-phased bill of capacity, and capacity requirements planning. The document provides examples of calculating capacity planning factors and constructing a bill of capacity using routing and bill of material data.

Uploaded by

Alfian Purwanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
140 views22 pages

2.4 Capacity Planning

The document discusses capacity planning techniques. It describes capacity planning as determining needed capacity levels to achieve production schedules and adjusting capacity or schedules if needed. Four common techniques are described: capacity planning factors, bill of capacity, time-phased bill of capacity, and capacity requirements planning. The document provides examples of calculating capacity planning factors and constructing a bill of capacity using routing and bill of material data.

Uploaded by

Alfian Purwanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2.

4 Capacity Planning
Learning Objectives
 Explain functions & importance of capacity planning
 State four techniques for capacity planning
 Explain capacity planning factor and bill of capacity
techniques
Capacity Planning
 Determining the level of capacity needed to achieve
scheduled production
 Comparing this with available capacity
 Plan necessary adjustments in capacity levels or schedules
 Critical elements:
 Labor
 Machine hours
 Facilities
 Warehouse space
 Engineering
Results of Insufficient Capacity
 Shortages
 Failure to meet production targets
 Overdue shipments to customers
 Frustrated production managers, and
 Loss of confidence in the formal system
Results of Too Much Capacity
 Low utilization of resources
 Manufacturing inefficiency
 High cost, and
 Reduced profit margins
Actions when Capacity is Under-Utilized
 Retrenchment
 Transfer out workers
 Look for more jobs
 Re-training of the workers
Prepare Production Schedule

Determine Required Capacity

Iterative No
Required Capacity =
Available Capacity?
Yes STOP

Process for
Production
No

Scheduling
Plan Adjusted Capacity

and Capacity Plan


Capacity Satisfactory?

Planning Yes

STOP
The Hierarchy of Capacity Plans and their
Relationship with Production Schedule
Schedule Planning Capacity Planning

Production Planning Resource Planning

Master Production Rough Cut Capacity


Scheduling Planning

Material Requirement Capacity Requirement


Planning Planning

Production Activity Control


Planning Horizons and Degree of Detail
for Capacity Plan
Planning
Horizon

Long Resource Plan

Medium
Rough Cut Capacity Plan

Medium- Capacity
Short Requirement Plan

Plant Department Work Center

Degree of Detail
Capacity Planning Techniques
Business Planning

Demand Management
- Forecasting
Market Planning
- Distribution Req. Planning
- Order Entry Top
Management

 Capacity Planning Production Planning


Resource Planning
Planning

Factors
 Bill Of Capacity Final Assembly Master Production Rough Cut Operations
Management
Scheduling Scheduling Capacity Planning

 Time-Phased Bill
Planning

Of Capacity
Material Capacity
Requirement Requirement
Planning (MRP) Planning

 Capacity
Requirements Production Activity Control
- Order Release
Purchasing
- Vendor Selection
Operations
Management

Planning
- Operations Scheduling
- Order Placement Execution
- Dispatching
- Vendor Scheduling
- Expediting
- Order Follow-up
- Production Reporting

Performance
Measurement
Capacity Planning Factors
 Conversion unit used to convert a planning output into the
number of units of some resource required to produce that
output
 Conversion unit is obtained indirectly from aggregate
historical data (Product Family quantity)
Calculating CPF
305/840X100
Data Used in Resource Planning using CPF
Total standard hours produced last quarter = 840
Number of units of product produce last quarter = 120
Average standard hours per unit (= 840/120) = 7
Department Standard Labor Hours Percentage of Standard
Produced Last Quarter Labor Hours
1 305 36.3
2 535 63.7
Total 840 100.0

Production Plan Next Quarter


Month Jan Feb Mar Total
Units 40 48 50 138

Resource Plan Load in Standard Labor Hours for Next Quarter


Department Jan Feb Mar Total
1 0.363X280 101.64 121.97 127.05 350.66
2 0.637X280 178.36 214.03 222.95 615.34
Total 280 336 350 966
7X40 7X48 7X50 7X138
Limitation of CPF Technique
 No consideration is given to the lead times
 No consideration is given to current on-hand and work-in-
progress inventories of components
 The average hours per unit used assumes that the same
product mix experienced in the past will continue in the
future
 No consideration is given to service parts and rework
Bill of Capacity
 States the capacities needed to produce a product
according to the bill of material
 Basic data needed to construct a BOC are found in the
BOM and routing files
 No consideration for lead times and current on-hand and
in process inventories of components
 Does not take into account manufacturing lead times or
current on hand and in-process inventories of
components
Product Structure for Product U and V

U V

W X W Y

RM RM RM RM
Fixed
Variable per Batch
Routing Data batch Size
Item Oper No Dept No Work Run Time/Unit Setup Time Avg Lot
Center No (Std. Hrs) (Std. Hrs) Size

U 10 1 15 1.6 2.0 4

V 10 1 15 2.4 3.0 6

W 10 2 35 1.2 1.0 20

20 2 40 0.4 0.5 20

X 10 2 35 1.1 2.1 8

20 2 40 0.6 0.6 8

Y 10 2 35 0.5 1.4 6

20 2 40 2.1 0.5 6
Standard Hours per Units I
t
e
m
Ope
r No
De
pt
No
Work
Cent
er
No
Run
Time/Uni
t (Std.
Hrs)
Setup
Time
(Std.
Hrs)
Avg
Lot
Size

U V U 10 1 15 1.6 2.0 4

V 10 1 15 2.4 3.0 6

W 10 2 35 1.2 1.0 20

20 2 40 0.4 0.5 20
W X W Y
X 10 2 35 1.1 2.1 8

20 2 40 0.6 0.6 8

Y 10 2 35 0.5 1.4 6
RM RM RM RM
20 2 40 2.1 0.5 6

Item Dept Work Center Std. Hrs per unit


U 1 15 2.100 1.6+2/4
V 1 15 2.900 2.4+3/6
W 2 35 1.250 1.2+1/20
2 40 0.425 0.4+0.5/20
X 2 35 1.363 1.1+2.1/8
2 40 0.675 0.6+0.6/8
Y 2 35 0.733 0.5+1.4/6
2 40 2.183 2.1+0.5/6
U V

Bill of Capacity W X W Y

RM RM RM RM

Dept. Product U Std. Labor


Work Center Hrs per unit
1 15 2.100
2 35 2.613
40 1.100

Dept. Product V Std. Labor Item Dept Work Std. Hrs per
Work Center Hrs per unit Center unit

1 15 2.900 U 1 15 2.100

2 35 1.25(W)+0.733(Y) 1.983 V 1 15 2.900


W 2 35 1.250
40 0.425(W)+2.183(Y)2.608
2 40 0.425
X 2 35 1.363
2 40 0.675
Y 2 35 0.733
2 40 2.183
MPS for Product U and V
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
U 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 5
V 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 8
Total (week) 10 10 10 10 11 12 12 13
Total (month) 40 X 48
Dept. Product U Std. Labor
X Work Center Hrs per unit

BOC
1 15 2.100
2 35 2.613
40 1.100

Dept. Product V Std. Labor


4x2.613+6X1.983 Work Center Hrs per unit
1 15 2.900
2 35 1.983

Rough Cut Capacity Planning


40 2.608

Week 1 + 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
WC15 25.8 26.6 26.6 26.6 29.5 31.6 31.6. 33.7
WC35 22.4 21.7 21.7 21.7 23.7 26.3 26.3 28.9
WC40 20.0 21.6 21.6 21.6 24.2 25.3 25.3 26.4
Total (week) 68.2 69.9 69.9 69.9 77.4 83.2 83.2 89.0
Total (month) 277.9 332.8
4X1.1+6X2.608
Characteristics of BOC
 Conversion factors are developed directly and in detail
 Facilitates the separate and more accurate treatment of
capacity required for service parts and rework
 Conversion factors are developed by product and applied
to the MPS, the effects of projected changes in product
mix can be taken into account
Time-Phase BOC (TPBOC)
 Similar to the BOC except time buckets in which loads occur
are determined by backward scheduling from MPS using
standard lead times
 Current on-hand and in-process inventories of components
are not taken into account

You might also like