100% found this document useful (1 vote)
359 views18 pages

ODM Boiler Energy Production Analysis

The document provides calculations for two scenarios (A and B) of an anaerobic digestion process using cattle manure and maize silage as feedstocks. Scenario B includes both cattle manure and maize silage as feedstocks, whereas Scenario A only considers cattle manure. Key outputs are calculated including biogas production, methane production, energy values, digester sizing requirements, and heat and energy balances. However, values are only partially calculated as inputs are given but many calculations are marked as '-' pending further input values.

Uploaded by

Sabariyanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • Mass Balance,
  • Digestate Production,
  • Volume of Feedstock,
  • Mass Reduction,
  • Outside Air Temperature,
  • Organic Dry Matter Calculation,
  • Biogas Mass,
  • Dry Matter,
  • Scenario Analysis,
  • Energy Balance
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
359 views18 pages

ODM Boiler Energy Production Analysis

The document provides calculations for two scenarios (A and B) of an anaerobic digestion process using cattle manure and maize silage as feedstocks. Scenario B includes both cattle manure and maize silage as feedstocks, whereas Scenario A only considers cattle manure. Key outputs are calculated including biogas production, methane production, energy values, digester sizing requirements, and heat and energy balances. However, values are only partially calculated as inputs are given but many calculations are marked as '-' pending further input values.

Uploaded by

Sabariyanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • Mass Balance,
  • Digestate Production,
  • Volume of Feedstock,
  • Mass Reduction,
  • Outside Air Temperature,
  • Organic Dry Matter Calculation,
  • Biogas Mass,
  • Dry Matter,
  • Scenario Analysis,
  • Energy Balance

PROCESS CALCULATIONS

Scenario A

Cattle Maize
FEEDSTOCK PARAMETERS Manure Silage

DM % 8% 33%
ODM % 87% 95%
CH4 % 58% 55%
BMP [Link]-1 190 400
Specific Gravity kg.m-3 1.03 1.05
Manure Production [Link]-1.d-1 60 -
Animals No. 500 -
Mass tonne.d-1 30.0 0.0
Volume m3.d-1 29.1 0.0
Mass [Link]-1 10,950 0

Dry matter tonne.d-1 2.4 0.0


Organic Dry Matter tonne.d-1 2.1 0.0
Methane Production m3.d-1 397 0
Biogas Production m3.d-1 684 0

DIGESTER CAPACITY CALCULATION


Mass of Feedstock tonne.d-1 - -
Volume of Feedstock m3.d-1 - -
Organic Dry Matter tonne.d-1 - -
Digester Capacity m3 - -
Hydraulic Retention Time d - -
Organic Loading Rate [Link]-3.d-1 - -

ENERGY BALANCE
Methane Production m3.d-1 397 0
Energy Value of Biogas MJ.d-1 14,163 0
Energy Value of Biogas kWh.d-1 3,934 0
Energy Value of Biogas kW 164 0
Biogas for Boiler % - -
Biogas for CHP % - -
Biogas Flared % - -
Heat Efficiency of Boiler % - -
Electrical Efficiency of CHP % - -
Heat Efficiency of CHP % - -

Energy Production
Heat Production from Boiler kW - -
Heat Production from CHP kW - -
Total Heat Production kW - -
Total Heat Production kWh.d-1 - -
Electricity Production kW - -
Electricity Production kWh.d-1 - -

Digester Heat Input


Temperature of Feedstock o
C 10 25
Temperature of Digester o
C - -
Heat Input to Feedstock MJ.d-1 3,771 0
Heat Input to Feedstock kW 44 0
Digester Surface Area m2 - -
Thermal Conductivity [Link]-1 - -
Outside Air Temperature o
C - -
Digester Heat Loss kW - -
Digester Heat Loss MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input kW - -
Digester Heat : Available Heat % - -

Energy Balance
Electricity Production kW - -
Digester Electricity Consumption kWh.d-1 - -
Digester Electricity Consumption kW - -
Digester Electricity : Output % - -

Heat Production kW - -
Total Digester Heat Input MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input kW - -
Digester Heat : Available Heat % - -

MASS BALANCE
Mass of Feedstock [Link]-1 10,950 0
Volume of CH4 [Link]-1 144,803 0
Volume of CO2 [Link]-1 104,857 0
Mass of CH4 [Link]-1 103 0
Mass of CO2 [Link]-1 206 0
Mass of Biogas [Link]-1 308 0
Mass of Digestate [Link]-1 10,642 0
Mass Reduction [Link]-1 308 0
% Mass Reduction % 3% #DIV/0!
Feedstock
Food Waste Total Notes

25% 8%
90% 87%
60% 58%
420 190
1.05 1.03
- -
- -
0.0 30.0
0.0 29.1 = mass / SG.
0 10,950

0.0 2.4 = mass x %DM


0.0 2.1 = DM x %ODM
0 397 = ODM x BMP
0 684 = CH4 / %CH4

- 30.0
- 29.1
- 2.1
- 600
- 20.0 = Digester Capacity / Feedstock Volume
- 3.5 = Organic Dry Matter * 1000/ Digester Capacity

0 397
0 14,163 = CH4 * 35.7
0 3,934 = MJ / 3600
0 164 = kWh / 24
- 5%
- 90%
- 5%
- 85%
- 30%
- 55% = 85% - Electrical Efficiency

- 7 = Energy Value * Boiler% * Boiler Efficiency


- 81 = Energy Value * CHP% * CHP Heat Efficiency
- 88
- 2,115 = kW * 24
- 44 = Energy Value * CHP% * CHP Electrical Efficiency
- 1,062

15 10
- 40
0 3,771 = Mass * Delta T * 4.19
0 44 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 394 Assumes Height = Diameter
- 0.35 Assumes 100mm of Mineral Wool
- 5
- 5 = Tank Area x Delta T x Conductivity / 1000
- 417 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 4,188 = Heat to Feedstock + Heat Loss
- 48 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 55%

- 44
- 50
- 2 = kWh /24
- 5%

- 88
- 4,188
- 48 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 55%

0 10,950
0 144,803
0 104,857 = Biogas - Methane
0 103 = CH4 * 0.71 / 1000
0 206 = CO2 * 1.96 / 1000
0 308
0 10,642 = Feedstock Mass - Biogas Mass
0 308
#DIV/0! 3%
PROCESS CALCULATIONS
Scenario B

Cattle Maize
FEEDSTOCK PARAMETERS Manure Silage

DM % 8% 33%
ODM % 87% 95%
CH4 % 58% 55%
BMP [Link]-1 190 400
Specific Gravity kg.m-3 1.03 1.05
Manure Production [Link]-1.d-1 60 -
Animals No. 500 -
Mass tonne.d-1 30.0 20.0
Volume m3.d-1 29.1 19.0
Mass [Link]-1 10,950 7,300

Dry matter tonne.d-1 2.4 6.6


Organic Dry Matter tonne.d-1 2.1 6.3
Methane Production m3.d-1 397 2,508
Biogas Production m3.d-1 684 4,560

DIGESTER CAPACITY CALCULATION


Mass of Feedstock tonne.d-1 - -
Volume of Feedstock m3.d-1 - -
Organic Dry Matter tonne.d-1 - -
Digester Capacity m3 - -
Hydraulic Retention Time d - -
Organic Loading Rate [Link]-3.d-1 - -

ENERGY BALANCE
Methane Production m3.d-1 397 2,508
Energy Value of Biogas MJ.d-1 14,163 89,536
Energy Value of Biogas kWh.d-1 3,934 24,871
Energy Value of Biogas kW 164 1,036
Biogas for Boiler % - -
Biogas for CHP % - -
Biogas Flared % - -
Heat Efficiency of Boiler % - -
Electrical Efficiency of CHP % - -
Heat Efficiency of CHP % - -

Energy Production
Heat Production from Boiler kW - -
Heat Production from CHP kW - -
Total Heat Production kW - -
Total Heat Production kWh.d-1 - -
Electricity Production kW - -
Electricity Production kWh.d-1 - -

Digester Heat Input


Temperature of Feedstock o
C 10 25
Temperature of Digester o
C - -
Heat Input to Feedstock MJ.d-1 3,771 1,257
Heat Input to Feedstock kW 44 15
Digester Surface Area m2 - -
Thermal Conductivity [Link]-1 - -
Outside Air Temperature o
C - -
Digester Heat Loss kW - -
Digester Heat Loss MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input kW - -
Digester Heat : Available Heat % - -

Energy Balance
Electricity Production kW - -
Digester Electricity Consumption kWh.d-1 - -
Digester Electricity Consumption kW - -
Digester Electricity : Output % - -

Heat Production kW - -
Total Digester Heat Input MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input kW - -
Digester Heat : Available Heat % - -

MASS BALANCE
Mass of Feedstock [Link]-1 10,950 7,300
Volume of CH4 [Link]-1 144,803 915,420
Volume of CO2 [Link]-1 104,857 748,980
Mass of CH4 [Link]-1 103 650
Mass of CO2 [Link]-1 206 1,468
Mass of Biogas [Link]-1 308 2,118
Mass of Digestate [Link]-1 10,642 5,182
Mass Reduction [Link]-1 308 2,118
% Mass Reduction % 3% 29%
Feedstock
Food Waste Total Notes

25% 18%
90% 93%
60% 55%
420 348
1.05 1.04
- -
- -
0.0 50.0
0.0 48.2 = mass / SG.
0 18,250

0.0 9.0 = mass x %DM


0.0 8.4 = DM x %ODM
0 2,905 = ODM x BMP
0 5,244 = CH4 / %CH4

- 50.0
- 48.2
- 8.4
- 2,300
- 46.0 = Digester Capacity / Feedstock Volume
- 3.6 = Organic Dry Matter * 1000/ Digester Capacity

0 2,905
0 103,699 = CH4 * 35.7
0 28,805 = MJ / 3600
0 1,200 = kWh / 24
- 5%
- 90%
- 5%
- 85%
- 40%
- 45% = 85% - Electrical Efficiency

- 51 = Energy Value * Boiler% * Boiler Efficiency


- 486 = Energy Value * CHP% * CHP Heat Efficiency
- 537
- 12,890 = kW * 24
- 432 = Energy Value * CHP% * CHP Electrical Efficiency
- 10,370

15 16
- 40
0 5,028 = Mass * Delta T * 4.19
0 58 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 965 Assumes Height = Diameter
- 0.35 Assumes 100mm of Mineral Wool
- 5
- 12 = Tank Area x Delta T x Conductivity / 1000
- 1,021 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 6,049 = Heat to Feedstock + Heat Loss
- 70 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 13%

- 432
- 600
- 25 = kWh /24
- 6%

- 537
- 6,049
- 70 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 13%

0 18,250
0 1,060,223
0 853,837 = Biogas - Methane
0 753 = CH4 * 0.71 / 1000
0 1,674 = CO2 * 1.96 / 1000
0 2,426
0 15,824 = Feedstock Mass - Biogas Mass
0 2,426
#DIV/0! 13%
PROCESS CALCULATIONS
Scenario C

Cattle Maize
FEEDSTOCK PARAMETERS Manure Silage

DM % 8% 33%
ODM % 87% 95%
CH4 % 58% 55%
BMP [Link]-1 190 400
Specific Gravity kg.m-3 1.03 1.05
Manure Production [Link]-1.d-1 60 -
Animals No. 500 -
Mass tonne.d-1 30.0 20.0
Volume m3.d-1 29.1 19.0
Mass [Link]-1 10,950 7,300

Dry matter tonne.d-1 2.4 6.6


Organic Dry Matter tonne.d-1 2.1 6.3
Methane Production m3.d-1 397 2,508
Biogas Production m3.d-1 684 4,560

DIGESTER CAPACITY CALCULATION


Mass of Feedstock tonne.d-1 - -
Volume of Feedstock m3.d-1 - -
Organic Dry Matter tonne.d-1 - -
Digester Capacity m3 - -
Hydraulic Retention Time d - -
Organic Loading Rate [Link]-3.d-1 - -

ENERGY BALANCE
Methane Production m3.d-1 397 2,508
Energy Value of Biogas MJ.d-1 14,163 89,536
Energy Value of Biogas kWh.d-1 3,934 24,871
Energy Value of Biogas kW 164 1,036
Biogas for Boiler % - -
Biogas for CHP % - -
Biogas Flared % - -
Heat Efficiency of Boiler % - -
Electrical Efficiency of CHP % - -
Heat Efficiency of CHP % - -

Energy Production
Heat Production from Boiler kW - -
Heat Production from CHP kW - -
Total Heat Production kW - -
Total Heat Production kWh.d-1 - -
Electricity Production kW - -
Electricity Production kWh.d-1 - -

Digester Heat Input


Temperature of Feedstock o
C 10 25
Temperature of Digester o
C - -
Heat Input to Feedstock MJ.d-1 3,771 1,257
Heat Input to Feedstock kW 44 15
Digester Surface Area m2 - -
Thermal Conductivity [Link]-1 - -
Outside Air Temperature o
C - -
Digester Heat Loss kW - -
Digester Heat Loss MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input kW - -
Digester Heat : Available Heat % - -

Energy Balance
Electricity Production kW - -
Digester Electricity Consumption kWh.d-1 - -
Digester Electricity Consumption kW - -
Digester Electricity : Output % - -

Heat Production kW - -
Total Digester Heat Input MJ.d-1 - -
Total Digester Heat Input kW - -
Digester Heat : Available Heat % - -

MASS BALANCE
Mass of Feedstock [Link]-1 10,950 7,300
Volume of CH4 [Link]-1 144,803 915,420
Volume of CO2 [Link]-1 104,857 748,980
Mass of CH4 [Link]-1 103 650
Mass of CO2 [Link]-1 206 1,468
Mass of Biogas [Link]-1 308 2,118
Mass of Digestate [Link]-1 10,642 5,182
Mass Reduction [Link]-1 308 2,118
% Mass Reduction % 3% 29%
Feedstock
Food Waste Total Notes

25% 19%
90% 92%
60% 56%
420 363
1.05 1.04
- -
- -
10.0 60.0
9.5 57.7 = mass / SG.
3,650 21,900

2.5 11.5 = mass x %DM


2.3 10.6 = DM x %ODM
945 3,850 = ODM x BMP
1,575 6,819 = CH4 / %CH4

- 60.0
- 57.7
- 10.6
- 3,000
- 50.0 = Digester Capacity / Feedstock Volume
- 3.5 = Organic Dry Matter * 1000/ Digester Capacity

945 3,850
33,737 137,435 = CH4 * 35.7
9,371 38,176 = MJ / 3600
390 1,591 = kWh / 24
- 5%
- 90%
- 5%
- 85%
- 40%
- 45% = 85% - Electrical Efficiency

- 68 = Energy Value * Boiler% * Boiler Efficiency


- 644 = Energy Value * CHP% * CHP Heat Efficiency
- 712
- 17,084 = kW * 24
- 573 = Energy Value * CHP% * CHP Electrical Efficiency
- 13,744

15 16
- 40
1,048 6,076 = Mass * Delta T * 4.19
12 70 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 1,151 Assumes Height = Diameter
- 0.35 Assumes 100mm of Mineral Wool
- 5
- 14 = Tank Area x Delta T x Conductivity / 1000
- 1,219 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 7,294 = Heat to Feedstock + Heat Loss
- 84 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 12%

- 573
- 1,000
- 42 = kWh /24
- 7%

- 712
- 7,294
- 84 = MJ * 1000 / 3600 /24
- 12%

3,650 21,900
344,925 1,405,148
229,950 1,083,787 = Biogas - Methane
245 998 = CH4 * 0.71 / 1000
451 2,124 = CO2 * 1.96 / 1000
696 3,122
2,954 18,778 = Feedstock Mass - Biogas Mass
696 3,122
19% 14%

Common questions

Powered by AI

Feedstock temperature significantly impacts the heat input requirements for an anaerobic digester. An increase in the feedstock temperature reduces the amount of external heat required to maintain the optimal temperature within the digester. For example, in the provided scenarios, there is a reduction in the heat input requirement when the feedstock temperature increases from 10°C to 25°C, as observed where the heat input to the feedstock decreases from 3,771 MJ/day to 1,257 MJ/day . This is because warmer incoming feedstock reduces the thermal gradient between the feedstock and the digester environment, resulting in lower energy needs to achieve and maintain the desired operational temperature.

Biogas flaring serves as a safety measure and a means to manage excess biogas that cannot be utilized due to capacity or operational constraints in an anaerobic digestion plant. While necessary for operational safety and environmental compliance (preventing methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from being released), flaring represents a loss in potential energy recovery. Unburnt flared biogas translates to missed opportunities for electricity or heat generation, thus negatively impacting the plant's overall energy efficiency. Optimizing plant capacity and operational strategies to minimize flaring can enhance energy recovery and improve the sustainability credentials of the plant .

The choice of feedstock significantly impacts the biochemical methane potential (BMP) and subsequent biogas production due to variations in the organic content and biodegradability of materials. For example, maize silage, with a BMP of 400, offers higher methane yields than cattle manure, which has a BMP of 190 as per scenarios B and C . This difference in BMP reflects the inherent differences in the organic matter composition and the efficiency with which microorganisms can decompose these materials to produce methane. The organic dry matter content and other parameters like specific gravity also contribute to the feedstock's behavior in the digester, affecting the biogas volume produced .

Electrical efficiency significantly influences the energy balance of a combined heat and power (CHP) system by determining how much biogas energy input is converted into electrical output. Higher electrical efficiency means more of the energy derived from the biogas is transformed into useful electricity rather than being lost as waste heat, thus improving the overall energy conversion and recovery from the digester process. For example, improvements in CHP electrical efficiency allow for greater electricity production per unit of biogas, enhancing the energy output share from anaerobic digestion and potentially improving the economic viability of the system .

Organic loading rate (OLR) significantly affects the performance and stability of an anaerobic digester by determining the amount of organic material introduced per volume of the digester per day. A higher OLR increases the substrate availability, potentially leading to higher biogas production, but can also lead to digester instability if not managed properly due to the risk of overloading, which can cause acid accumulation and system upset. Conversely, a lower OLR may ensure stability but could lead to suboptimal methane production and efficiency. Therefore, balancing OLR is crucial: it requires precise management based on feedstock characteristics and system design to maintain conducive conditions for microbial activity and optimal digester performance .

Several factors contribute to digester heat losses, including thermal conductivity of the digester construction material, surface area, and the temperature difference between the digester and the outside environment. Minimizing these losses is crucial for maintaining energy efficiency. One effective strategy is improving insulation, such as using mineral wool, which reduces thermal conductivity and thus heat loss. Additionally, optimizing design parameters such as digester surface area (assumption: height equals diameter) and maintaining a consistent interior temperature help in minimizing heat dissipation. For example, in scenarios using mineral wool insulation, a reduction in thermal conductivity aids in minimizing heat loss and thus conserves energy input needed for maintaining optimal digester temperatures .

Manure production directly impacts the design and capacity planning of an anaerobic digester by influencing the volume and characteristics of the feedstock that the digester must process. The quantity of manure, as exemplified by production rates of 60 kg per animal with a total of 500 animals in one of the scenarios, determines the necessary size and hydraulic loading capacity of the digester to ensure efficient processing without overflow or underloading . The specific characteristics of the manure, such as its dry matter content and biodegradability, also inform the choice of digester configuration and operational strategies. Accurate prediction and adjustment for manure variability are crucial for designing robust and scalable digester systems capable of optimizing biogas production while accommodating different feedstock types .

Methane production variations between cattle manure and maize silage in anaerobic digestion are primarily driven by the differences in their feedstock parameters such as dry matter (DM%), organic dry matter (ODM%), and biochemical methane potential (BMP). Maize silage typically has a higher ODM and BMP, which results in higher methane yields per unit of feedstock compared to cattle manure. For instance, in Scenario A, maize silage has a BMP of 400, which is more than double that of cattle manure's BMP of 190 . Additionally, the specific gravity and the consistency of these feedstocks also affect the hydraulic and organic loading rates in the digester, influencing methane output .

Mass reduction percentages can have significant implications on the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process. A higher mass reduction percentage indicates more effective conversion of feedstock into biogas, translating to better performance and efficiency of the digestion system. In the scenarios provided, mass reduction percentages differ significantly: for instance, Scenario B shows a 29% mass reduction compared to 3% in Scenario A . This suggests more organic material in Scenario B is converted into biogas, likely resulting in greater energy recovery from the same amount of feedstock, thereby enhancing the system's overall efficiency and reducing the volume of digestate that needs further disposal or use.

The temperature of feedstock prior to entering an anaerobic digester affects the digester's thermal balance significantly, as it determines the initial heat load required to bring feedstock to the optimal digestion temperature. By increasing the entering temperature from 10°C to 25°C, less supplementary heat input is needed, reducing the overall energy demands of the digester system. This thermal efficiency gains contribute to enhancing the energy balance of the digester by reducing the cost and energy consumption associated with heating the feedstock to ideal operating conditions, ultimately facilitating a more cost-effective and energy-efficient anaerobic digestion process .

You might also like