Scribd
Upload
37 views2 pages

Step 2: Compute For Validation SBM Assessment Score (40%)

This document outlines a scoring process for validating schools' implementation of School-Based Management. It involves 3 steps: 1) determining a Performance Improvement score based on indicators of access, efficiency, and quality, 2) computing an SBM Assessment score by rating principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management, and 3) calculating a final rating by weighing the Performance and SBM scores. Schools must achieve a "Better" rating on their Performance Improvement to qualify for the full validation assessment. The final rating will classify their SBM implementation as Developing, Maturing, or Advanced.

Uploaded by

Shanks D. Teach
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views2 pages

Step 2: Compute For Validation SBM Assessment Score (40%)

This document outlines a scoring process for validating schools' implementation of School-Based Management. It involves 3 steps: 1) determining a Performance Improvement score based on indicators of access, efficiency, and quality, 2) computing an SBM Assessment score by rating principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management, and 3) calculating a final rating by weighing the Performance and SBM scores. Schools must achieve a "Better" rating on their Performance Improvement to qualify for the full validation assessment. The final rating will classify their SBM implementation as Developing, Maturing, or Advanced.

Uploaded by

Shanks D. Teach
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Step 2: Compute for Validation SBM Assessment Score (40%) CUMULATIVE SCORE OF VALIDATION PER

PRINCIPLE
SBM PRINCIPLES WEIGHT
SCORE WEIGTED SCORE
Leadership 30% 0
Curriculum and Instruction 30% 0
Accountability 25% 0
Resource Management 15% 0
SUBTOTAL 100% 0

Interpretation: ________Good ________Better ________Best

Numerical Rating Scale: Description


0.50-1.49 Good
1.50-2.49 Better
2.50-3.00 Best

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating


Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance Improvement 60%
B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40%
TOTAL 100%

Interpretation: _____Developing (I) _____Maturing (II) _____Advanced (III)

Prepared by:

Name of School Head Over Printed Name


Repubic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
Iriga City

SBM VALIDATION FORM


Name of School: Division:

Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)


Rating and Equivalent Computation Result
Thematic Area Performance Indicator Points
ENROLMENT INCREASE % of Increase
SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 1%
ACCESS (45%) SY 2016-2017 increase, 2-Average: at
least 7% increase, 3-High:
SY 2017-2018 at least 10% increase
AVE. % INCREASE %
DROP-OUT RATE (DR) % of Decrease
Baseline: 7.06
SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 25%
SY 2016-2017 increase, 2-Average: at
SY 2017-2018 least 50% increase, 3-High:
has 0 dropout
AVE. % DECREASE
COMPLETION RATE (CR) % of Increase
Baseline: 75%
SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 5%
increase, 2-Average: at
EFFICIENCY (25%) SY 2016-2017
least 7% increase, 3-High:
SY 2017-2018 at least 10% increase
AVE. % INCREASE
COHORT SURVIVAL RATE (CSR) % of Increase
Baseline: 76%
SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: at least 25%
SY 2016-2017 increase, 2-Average: at
least 50% increase, 3-High:
SY 2017-2018 at least 10% increase
AVE. % INCREASE
NAT MPS % of Increase
SY 2015-2016 1-Marginal: 26-50%
QUALITY (30%) SY 2016-2017 2-Average: 51-75%
SY 2017-2018 3-High: 76-100%
AVE. % INCREASE %
Sub-Total

Interpretation Good
Better
Best

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale


0.50-1.49 Good
1.50-2.49 Better
2.50-3.00 Best

Note: Only schools having a Performance of Improvement of "Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation

You might also like