Scribd
Upload
100 views4 pages

Correlations: Porchaseofgoo D Employeecost Adminexpense S Year Pearson Correlation

This document analyzes the correlation and relationship between sales, consumption, purchases, employee costs, and administrative costs from 2010-2018. A regression analysis found that sales are highly correlated with and can be predicted from consumption, purchases, employee costs, and administrative costs, with an adjusted R-squared value of 0.984. The regression model shows that sales values change significantly with fluctuations in these expenses.

Uploaded by

PRAGYAN PANDA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100 views4 pages

Correlations: Porchaseofgoo D Employeecost Adminexpense S Year Pearson Correlation

This document analyzes the correlation and relationship between sales, consumption, purchases, employee costs, and administrative costs from 2010-2018. A regression analysis found that sales are highly correlated with and can be predicted from consumption, purchases, employee costs, and administrative costs, with an adjusted R-squared value of 0.984. The regression model shows that sales values change significantly with fluctuations in these expenses.

Uploaded by

PRAGYAN PANDA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CORELATION ANALYSIS

YEAR SALES CONSUMPTIO PURCHAS EMPLOYE ADMI


N E E COST N
COST
2018.0 2455.2 544.83 342.22 115.23 260.52
0 9
2017.0 2320.4 612.52 353.56 114.10 203.72
0 0
2016.0 2481.6 591.63 353.56 118.56 325.42
0 8
2015.0 2332.2 576.86 343.30 113.29 334.73
0 7
2014.0 2047.2 524.50 283.41 94.96 294.49
0 0
2013.0 1684.8 494.10 243.79 99.65 285.27
0 6
2012.0 1294.7 395.89 145.06 64.66 233.44
0 0
2011.0 1000.2 299.70 90.53 50.57 184.78
0 5
2010.0 904.46 238.27 40.85 43.46 161.47
0
2009.0 772.81 235.89 - 34.64 89.56
0

Correlations
porchaseofgoo adminexpense
year sales consumption d employeecost s
year Pearson Correlation 1 .962** .926** .937** .943** .670*
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .034
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
sales Pearson Correlation .962** 1 .971** .990** .982** .793**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .006
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
consumption Pearson Correlation .926** .971** 1 .988** .984** .809**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .005
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
porchaseofgood Pearson Correlation .937** .990** .988** 1 .990** .728*
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .026
N 9 9 9 9 9 9
employeecost Pearson Correlation .943** .982** .984** .990** 1 .825**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .003
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
adminexpenses Pearson Correlation .670* .793** .809** .728* .825** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .034 .006 .005 .026 .003
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Variables Entered/Removeda
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
1 Employee cost, . Enter
admin
expenses,
consumption,
purchase of
goodb
a. Dependent Variable: sales

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
1 .996a .992 .984 80.04616
a. Predictors: (Constant), employee cost, admin expenses,
consumption, purchase of good
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 3182418.826 4 795604.707 124.170 .000b
Residual 25629.549 4 6407.387
Total 3208048.375 8
a. Dependent Variable: sales
b. Predictors: (Constant), employee cost, admin expenses, consumption, purchase of good

Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval
Coefficients Coefficients for B
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) 1402.721 372.893 3.762 .020 367.403 2438.039
consumption -3.385 1.403 -.716 -2.413 .073 -7.279 .510
Admin .222 .693 .022 .321 .764 -1.702 2.146
expenses
Purchase of 9.761 2.268 1.885 4.303 .013 3.463 16.059
good
Employee cost -4.382 7.007 -.205 -.625 .566 -23.835 15.072
a. Dependent Variable: sales

From the data we have taken above we kept net sales as dependent variable and admin cost,
employee cost , purchase and consumption of goods as independent variable. We wanted to
see the changes happening to sales by various expenses occurring in the organization as the p
value is less than .05 it can be concluded it is significant and shows that sales value changes
with the expenses made.

You might also like