DYNAMIC PACKAGING
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Despite having a grand plan during the DPC’s strategic planning process, the company is unsure what
strategic direction to take in order to achieve its aim of becoming the number one firm in the repacking
business.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the strategies DPC should execute to increase its market share.
2. To document the processes in order to implement the strategies effectively.
ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION
1. Maintain and improve liquid line services.
Liquid Line Services has low manufacturing/fixed cost
DPC may lose focus and neglect their other product lines
2. Retail the repacked items under the company’s own brand name.
Provides more control on the products being packaged.
They’ll be able to create their own name both in the packaging and commodity provider
industry
Costly because they may need an R&D team to formulate new products
They’ll have increased liability in the items that they’d release in the market
3. Create new and related product lines.
Increases the number of product lines
They’ll be able to really meet the customers’ other needs
Requires research about the market they want to tap
Risky because it is going beyond what they are used to
RECOMMENDATION
Maintain and improve liquid line services.
The Liquid Line Services of DPC posed the greatest opportunity for growth. This service line bested in
the contribution margin analysis because of higher returns, limited players in the industry, and the huge
potential for growth. In order to maximize this strength, DPC should invest to improve its Liquid Line
Services.
ANALYSIS OF RELEVANT FACTS
STRENGTHS:
Operates in three service lines
3rd Place in terms of market share in the industry
The president is hands-on in the operations
Provides packing services to several big companies such as RFM, LTS, Phils., Wrigleys, Kraft
WEAKNESSES:
Did not have formal written company policies on procedures of different functions
Packaging or repacking function did not bear DPC’s name
Centralized organizational structure
OPPORTUNITIES:
Limited industry players, huge growth potential
Diversification to repacking even non-food items (e.g. shampoo, toothpaste, gel, etc)
Venture into retailing or repacking items carrying their own brand name
THREATS:
Greatest competitor holds 50% of marker share
Possibility of major clients repacking their own products