Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

RUBRIC For Final Defense Output

This document contains rubrics for grading a student's quarterly exam and oral defense for the subject Practical Research 2. The exam rubric has 4 criteria (thesis clarity, organization, support, and conventions) and assigns point values from 5 to 15 points depending on the level of proficiency demonstrated. The oral defense rubric also has 4 criteria and assigns point values from 8 to 25 points. It will be used to grade students on how clearly they state their purpose, organize their ideas, support their arguments, and speak without errors. The document provides transparency to students on how their work will be assessed.

Uploaded by

Jamaica Molina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

RUBRIC For Final Defense Output

This document contains rubrics for grading a student's quarterly exam and oral defense for the subject Practical Research 2. The exam rubric has 4 criteria (thesis clarity, organization, support, and conventions) and assigns point values from 5 to 15 points depending on the level of proficiency demonstrated. The oral defense rubric also has 4 criteria and assigns point values from 8 to 25 points. It will be used to grade students on how clearly they state their purpose, organize their ideas, support their arguments, and speak without errors. The document provides transparency to students on how their work will be assessed.

Uploaded by

Jamaica Molina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Rubric for Grading Practical Research 2: Provides criteria and point distribution for scoring the quarterly exams in Practical Research 2.
  • Rubric for Grading Oral Defense: Details criteria and scoring for the assessment of oral defense presentations in Practical Research 2.

Name: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________

Yr. & Section: ___________ Instructor: Ms. Keisha Mae Vidamo Permit #: ____________

ISHRM Senior High School


Bacoor
2nd Quarter
A.Y: 2019-2020
1st Semester
Practical Research 2

I. Rubrics for grading the Quarterly Exam for the subject Practical Research 2. (60 pts.)
NO LIMITED SOME AVERAGE HIGH
QUALITY →
PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCY EVIDENCE OF PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCY
SCORE
PROFICIENCY
CRITERIA ↓
5 8 10 12 15
Reader cannot Purpose are Purpose are
Thesis clarity Vague or
THESIS determine the fairly clear to clear, match
missing loosely related
CLARITY clarity task task
Organized Organized
Unclear
Some signs of sequence, but sequence of
Disorganized organization,
organization could be ideas is
ORGANIZATION confusing
improved effective
Substantial,
Some solid
Underdeveloped Offers support logical, &
No support for support,
support of ideas, of obvious concrete
ideas or details assumption not
SUPPORT off-topic, errors details support of all
all clear
ideas
Poor grammar Repeated
Weak grammar, Errors, that do
and usage, weaknesses in Essentially
usage, hard to not interfere
meaning mechanics and error free
CONVENTIONS understand with meaning
unclear usage
TOTAL SCORE
Name: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________
Yr. & Section: ___________ Instructor: Ms. Keisha Mae Vidamo Permit #: ____________

II. Rubric for grading the Quarterly Output Oral Defense for the subject Practical Research 2.
(100 pts.)

NO LIMITED SOME AVERAGE HIGH


QUALITY →
PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCY EVIDENCE OF PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCY
SCORE
PROFICIENCY
CRITERIA ↓
8 10 15 18 25
Purpose are
Researcher Purpose are
Thesis clarity Vague or clear, match
THESIS cannot determine fairly clearly
missing loosely related task by the
CLARITY the clarity stated
researcher
Organized
Some signs of sequence, but Organized
Unclear organization could be sequence of
Ideas aren’t
organization, with the way improved by ideas is
showing
confusing even to the researcher using words effectively
ORGANIZATION cohesion
the researcher explained more showcased by
everything appropriate to the researcher
the idea
Substantial,
Underdeveloped logical, &
No support for Some solid
support of ideas, Offers support concrete
ideas or details support,
off-topic, errors of obvious support of all
cited by the assumption not
SUPPORT are committed by details ideas are
researcher all clear
the researcher stated by the
researcher
Errors, that do
Repeated
Poor grammar Weak grammar, not interfere
weaknesses in Essentially
and usage, usage, hard to with meaning
mechanics and error free
meaning understand are committed
CONVENTIONS wrong usage statements
unclear by the
of words
reseracher
TOTAL SCORE

EDUARDO D. HIPOLITO ORLANDO M. DE VILLA


Coordinator, Senior High School Dept. Dean, Tech Voc. Training & SHS Dept.

You might also like