Scribd
Upload
206 views2 pages

Ph.D. Oral Defence Evaluation Form

The document is an evaluation form for a Ph.D. oral defense at Rajasthan Technical University. It collects information about the student, thesis details, recommendations from three examiners on accepting, revising, or rejecting the thesis, confirmation that examiner suggestions were incorporated, verification that the work is the student's own, examiner comments on the presentation and answers to questions, and signatures from internal and external examiners indicating if the student passed or failed.

Uploaded by

manish_chaturvedi_6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
206 views2 pages

Ph.D. Oral Defence Evaluation Form

The document is an evaluation form for a Ph.D. oral defense at Rajasthan Technical University. It collects information about the student, thesis details, recommendations from three examiners on accepting, revising, or rejecting the thesis, confirmation that examiner suggestions were incorporated, verification that the work is the student's own, examiner comments on the presentation and answers to questions, and signatures from internal and external examiners indicating if the student passed or failed.

Uploaded by

manish_chaturvedi_6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RAJASTHAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, KOTA

Ph.D. Oral Defence Evaluation Form

1. Name of the student:

2. Enrollment Number:
3. Date* ,Time &
Venue of oral Exam:

4. Name of University Department


/University Center/Research Center:

5. Title of Thesis:

6. Thesis Supervisor (s):

7. Recommendations of Thesis Examiners: (Strike out which is not applicable)


i. Examiner 1 Accept / Revise / Reject

ii. Examiner 2 Accept / Revise / Reject

iii. Examiner3 Accept / Revise / Reject

7. Necessary modifications suggested by the thesis YES / NO


examiners have been incorporated:
8. Authenticate the work as the students’ own: YES / NO
9. Comments (elicit the candidate’s replies to the questions raised by the thesis examiners and judge if the presentation
of the work by the student and the answers to the questions asked have been satisfactory): (Continue on reverse, if
necessary)

1
10. The candidate has PASSED / FAILED

Internal Examiner External Examiner

Signature

Name

Designation

Department &
Institute
* Details of Oral examination shall be adequately notified well in advance to enable interested students and
faculty members of the University to attend it
.

Date: Chairperson
Department Research Committee

Dean (Research)

Hon’ble Vice Chancellor

You might also like