1
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
Learning can be defined as permanent changes in behavior induced by life. It
is a knowledge that is gained and acquired through living, and also a process whereby
knowledge is created through the transformation of experience. Facilitating the
learning process is the primary aim of teaching. Understanding the learning behavior
of the students is considered to be a part of the process of learning. Therefore the
concept of learning style has become a popular topic in recent literatures, with many
theories about learning styles put forward to better understand the dynamic process of
learning.
“Learning Style”, a comfort of an individual to be able to understand and gain
new information and learning in its own unique way. It can also be a new strategic
instrument to improve student’s academic performance as visual, kinesthetic, and
auditory.
Additionally, learners could have different learning styles namely: Visual,
auditory and kinesthetic learning style. Visual learning style is defined as the gaining
of information through the use of images, videos, tutorials, and other visual materials.
Next is auditory learning style, it is when the learners much prefer to study in a quiet
place or listening to music, speaking, and through the use of other audio materials.
Lastly is kinesthetic, it is when the learners used to gain information by application,
handy work, and actual making to retain the learning in their memory.
According to Ibrahim R.H. and Hussein D. (2016) learning style refers to the
ability of learner to perceive information in learning situation. Visual, auditory, and
2
kinesthetic (VAK) learning style is a learning style in which students use three of
sensory perception to receive information. Visual learners learn through seeing, so
tools like diagrams, flowcharts, pictures, and symbols as the key for better
understanding concepts. Auditory learners learn through listening. As such, attending
lectures, tutorials and group discussion are really significant to them. Kinesthetic
learners learn through doing. They learn by trying to take an example from the text, or
lecture, or lab, and then try creating your own example.
Many researchers studied the relationship between the learning style and
academic performance of High School, college and Elementary students. They
conducted certain studies on how learning styles affect the academic performance of
the said students and formulated possible solutions and recommendations for the
improvement of their academic performance.
Since K-12 program, is timely and relevant to the Philippines, and senior high
school was just freshly introduce, the researchers found out that there is no further
study that focuses only on the learning style and its correlation to the academic
performance of senior high school students.
The researchers conducted a quantitative study that will investigate the
relationship between learning style and academic performance among grade 11 senior
high school students. The researchers contextualized the quantitative study in the
grade 11 senior high school students at Vicente P. Trinidad National High School.
The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between learning
styles and academic performance of senior high school students. The researchers
aimed to know the preferred style of learning of the grade 11 students in order to
improve their academic performance
3
Statement of the problem
The general problem of this study is: how may the learning style correlate to
the academic performances of the senior high school students.
Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents?
2. What is the academic performance of the respondents in terms of their general
average during first grading period of the 1st semester in S.Y. 2019-2020?
3. What is the preferred learning style of senior high school students?
4. Is there a significant relationship between learning style and academic
performance of senior high school students?
Significance of the study
This study was conducted to determine the learning styles of the grade 11
senior high school and how does it correlate to their academic performance. The result
of the study will be great significant to the following:
Students – This study benefited the learners in the sense of helping them to
know their own prefer learning style, and give them further knowledge about the
relationship of learning style and academic performance.
Teachers – This study served as a guide to understand the various learning
style favored by the learners. The given data enabled the teachers to match their
teaching strategies to their students learning styles by explaining and presenting
things in different ways using alternative teaching aids and techniques and tailoring
the activities that they provide to suit their student’s learning style.
4
Parents – Like the teachers, the parents benefited by this study in a sense that
they will have further understanding about the different learning style of their
children. Furthermore, it gives them an idea on how they can help their children to
develop their learning style towards good academic performance.
School Administrators-The given data guided the teachers and administrators
on what to do and what program to conduct in order to enhance the students learning
style towards academic performance.
Future Researchers: To conduct a further study that will fills other gaps.
Furthermore, it served as the guide for them to provide deep understanding with
regards to learning style of senior high school students and their academic
performances.
Scope and delimitation of the study
This study limits its coverage only to the grade 11 senior high school students.
Its main purpose is to determine the learning style used by the students and its
correlation to their academic performance. This study conducted at the senior high
school building in Vicente P. Trinidad National High School located at Ruby St.,
Phase V, Sta. Lucia Village Punturin Valenzuela City. The timeframe of this study is
limited only for the second quarter of second semester in school year 2019-2020.
The study is limited only to a small number of respondents. The results and
findings may differ upon the number of respondents because if there are more
respondents’ different results may find and it will give more accurate learning styles
of grade 11 senior high school. Furthermore, the study did not include: the effect of
teaching strategies to the learning style of the students in academic performance, and
5
comparison of learning style among senior high school to junior high school. Also,
the study did not include the comparison of learning style among tracks and the
concept of multiple intelligences in identifying student ways of processing
information.
The study focused only to the three learning styles which are visual, auditory
and kinesthetic (VAK), and its relationship to their academic performance. The
respondents had given a questionnaire containing a question used to determine the
different learning style of the students.
As the researchers only focused on three mention learning style, they did not
include other leaning styles aside from visual, auditory and kinesthetic. Therefore, this
study suggest to the future researchers to find what are the other learning styles of the
senior high school student and also it suggests to the future researchers to focus on
this area that the researcher did not include.
Definition of terms
The following terms are being defined conceptually;
Academic Performance- It is defined as how well a student meet the standards
set out by the by the local government which is the Dep-Ed and its institution.
Furthermore, it is a result of every action and performance of the students inside the
school.
Learning Style- defined as the way human beings prefer to concentrate on or
to learn in an easiest way, store and remember new and/or difficult information It is a
6
comfort of an individual to be able to understand and gain new information and
learning, can also be a new strategic instrument to improve student’s academic
performance as visual, kinesthetic, and auditory.
Learning – a process of gaining information through experience and the use of
learning styles
Auditory learning style- is defined as the gaining of information through
listening to music, speaking, and other audio materials. It enables auditory learners to
learn best by hearing or through verbal communication.
Kinesthetic learning style- is defined as the gaining of information by
application, handy work, and actual making to retain the learning in their memory. It
is the prefer learning style by kinesthetic learners wherein they are comfortable to
learn things by applying and performing it handily.
Visual learning style- is defined as the gaining of information through the use
of images, videos, tutorials, and other visual materials. It is the prefer learning style
by visual learners wherein they use those sensory objects and images which stimulate
and support learning.
7
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter presents a substantial amount of literature at the beginning of the
study to provide direction to the research question and hypothesis. It is also used to
introduce a problem or to describe in detail the existing literature in the “learning style
and academic performances of senior high school students”, or more other similar
phrase. Furthermore, this chapter also introduce relevant theories, and describe each
theory that will be used and suggest why it is a useful theory to examine.
Relevant Theories
The researchers present the following relevant theories that are related to the
study of relationship of learning style and academic performance of senior high
school:
Meta-cognition – this theory is first to defined by Flavell (1978). It is a
knowledge that takes as its object or regulates any aspect of cognitive endeavor. The
term meta-cognition used to describe the awareness of knowing in relation to
memory. Brown and Baker (1984) further defined the idea of meta-cognitive
knowledge by emphasizing the difference between static and strategic knowledge.
Static knowledge is what people are able to verbalize about cognition; whereas
strategic knowledge consists of strategies that people used to regulate in a particular
cognitive activity. In addition, meta-cognition is an awareness of what skills,
strategies and resources are needed to perform the task effectively.
8
In similar to this theory, the study is also discusses about learning by using
meta-cognitive thinking skills and it will be more maximize through the use of
learning style. Moreover, like what the theory says, the meta-cognition used to
describe the awareness of knowing in relation to memory. Meaning to say, using
visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style can help the learner retain the
knowledge durably and easily.
Constructionism – this theory states that a learner are constructing knowledge
and learning through experience. Constructionism is a building of knowledge
structure through progressive internalization of actions. It then adds the idea that this
happens especially suited and appropriate in an environment where the learner is
consciously engage in constructing knowledge while doing an actual work. In
addition the theory says that the learners should have greater focus on learning
through making rather than cognitive potentials (Papert, 1980, p.1)
The theory is closely related to the study particularly in kinesthetic learning
style where in it says that learners who have this kind of learning style are very much
prefer to gain knowledge through making, handy works, actions and applications. The
theory helps us understands how the ideas are formed and transformed when
expressed through different media, when actualized in a particular environment, and
when work out in individual minds.
The theory that supported to the study is the VAK theory it is designed to
describe how distinct type of learner’s process information. VAK stands for visual,
auditory, and kinesthetic. The VAK learning style uses the three main sensory
receivers to determine a person’s preferred learning style. The Visual learners learn
best from charts, graphs, pictures, videos and others. They process the information
9
much quicker when the information is presented in front of them while auditory
learners learn best through listening such as discussion, talking things through and
listening to what others have to say and lastly kinesthetic learners learn best through
moving, doing and touching. They learn through hands on approach and actively
exploring the physical world around them. This theory was pioneered in 1987 by Neil
Fleming.
As similar to the theory, the researchers also focus to the three types of
learning style namely: visual, auditory and kinesthetic. Visual learning style is defined
as the gaining of information through the use of images, videos, tutorials, and other
visual materials. Next is auditory learning style, it is when the learners much prefer to
study in a quiet place or listening to music, speaking, and other audio materials.
Lastly is kinesthetic, it is when the learners used to gain information by application,
handy work, and actual making to retain the learning in their memory.
Related Literature
On one hand, the concept of learning style became synonymous with the
concept of multiple intelligences. According to the theory of multiple intelligences,
human being has one central “computer “where intelligence stored” (Howard
Gardner, 1983). Meaning to say, different intelligences are being installed and used at
the same time and depending upon the situation.
On the other hand, learning styles based on the study of Barbara Prashnig
(2005), defined as the way human beings prefer to concentrate on or to learn in an
easiest way, store and remember new and/or difficult information. It means that a
learner has one dominant unique way of gaining knowledge which is called the
learning style. On the other hand, multiple intelligences did not give information
10
about the specific learning needs of a student has during the information intake
process.
It only scopes the ability to reason, calculate and handle logical thinking while
in the other hand learning style are the ways in which an individual approach a
range of tasks. It provides insight into students’ reflective or impulsive thinking
styles, sequential or simultaneous brain processing and overall possibilities for either
analytic or holistic brain dominance (Prashnig, 2005).
Moreover, learning style is defined as consistent way of functioning that
reflects the underlying causes of learning behavior. It is both a characteristic which
indicates how a student likes to learn, as well as instructional strategy informing the
cognition, context and content of learning. Previous studies have reported that
student’s learning performance could be improved if proper learning style dimensions
could be taken into consideration when developing any learning or instructional
process (Graff, Liu &Kinshuk, 2010). Furthermore, it is a comfort of an individual to
be able to understand and gain new information in a unique way; it can also be a new
strategic instrument to improve student’s academic performance as visual, kinesthetic,
and auditory.
Additionally, learners can have different learning styles namely: Visual,
auditory and kinesthetic learning style. Visual learning style is defined as the gaining
of information through the use of images, videos, tutorials, and other visual materials.
Next is auditory learning style, it is when the learners much prefer to study in a quiet
place or listening to music, speaking, and other audio materials. Lastly is kinesthetic,
it is when the learners used to gain information by application, handy work, and actual
making to retain the learning in their memory.
11
According toIbrahim R.H. and Hussein D. (2016) learning style refers to the
ability of learner to perceive information in learning situation. Visual, auditory, and
kinesthetic learning style is a learning style in which students use three of sensory
perception to receive information. Visual learners learn through seeing, so tools like
diagrams, flowcharts, pictures, and symbols as the key for better understanding
concepts. Auditory learners learn through listening. As such, attending lectures,
tutorials and group discussion are really significant to them. Kinesthetic learners learn
through doing. They learn by trying to take an example from the text, or lecture, or
lab, and then try creating your own example.
In addition, academic performance is defined as how well a student meets the
standards set out by the local government and its institution and its result (Bell J.
2018).
At the end of the study, the researcher then revisits the literature and makes a
comparison between the results with the existing findings in the literature. In this
model, the quantitative researchers use the literature deductively as a framework for
the research question or hypothesis.
The researchers used Library research gathering data from library materials
which includes textbooks, both published and unpublished academic documents such
as journal articles, conference proceedings, dissertations and theses. Library research
also has information and data got from internet search. Moreover, the researchers used
international journals especially those that report foreign research studies. There are
journals widely read at your field, and typically they are publication with high quality
editorial board consisting of individuals from around the United States or abroad.
12
The researchers also used local studies those studies that was conducted in the
Philippines, to have comparison with the foreign. Lastly is web, it also gives helpful
materials, related studies and related concepts for the literature review. Follow up on
references at the end of the articles for more resources to examine.
This paper used thematic approach. In a thematic literature review, the
researchers arrange, discuss and organize existing literature based on topics themes or
theoretical concepts he or she thinks are important in understanding the topic of the
study. Moreover, thematic analysis provides a highly flexible approach that can be
modified for the needs of many studies, providing a full and detailed, yet complex
account of data (Braun & Clarke, 2006; King, 2004).
Related Studies
As stated by the study of Jahambakhsh R. (2012), the study investigates the
relationship between the learning styles of Iranian high school girl’s student and their
academic achievement based on their majors. The 3483 students were chosen by
means of random sampling method. The results of the study showed that the learning
styles of the student have significant correlation with the academic achievement of the
student whose major was science.
In addition, the article of Ilcinet, et al (2018) determines if the learning styles
of the students could affect their academic performance. 184 physiotherapy students
were selected. The result found out that the participants learning styles was related
with significantly higher academic performance.
Moreover, the study of Amad F., et al. (2009), determines the most dominate
learning styles of students taking English paper in SMK TengkuIntanZahara and if the
13
teachers were aware of these learning styles. The study used cluster random sampling
among 60 selected form 4 students and 48 form 5 students. The study found out that
the most preferred learning styles of the students is visual learning style and also the
study showed that the teachers were aware of the students preferred learning styles
and tried their best to match their teaching styles to synchronize the student
preferences.
In similar to the study of Kibasan& Singson (2016), that determines the
learning style of Libyan college students in Tripoli, Libya. The result of the study
found out that majority of the Libyan college students were visual Learners.
In the study of Almigbal (2015), determines the relationship between the
learning style preferences of Saudi Medical Students and their academic
achievements. The study has 600 medical students-respondents at King of Saudi
University. The VARK Questionnaire was used to categorize and identify the learning
style preferences. The result shows that 43% of the students preferred to learn using
all VARK modalities (visual, auditory, read/write, and kinesthetic).
While in the Philippines the study of Lumanong (2016), determine the
learning styles and preferred effective learning styles of the college freshmen students
in Bukidnon State University. The gathered among 43 regulars first year students. The
findings discovered that there are 44% and 28% who are visual and auditory learners
who prefer the facilitator teaching style.
Then in the study of Magulod (2019), determine the learning style preference,
study habits and level of academic achievement, of the students enrolled in applied
science that needs to complement instructional strategies and activities to become
better learners. The study uses a descriptive correlation research design in a total of 75
14
respondents. The results of the study acknowledge that the students need visual, group
and kinesthetic as a major learning style.
The study of Carbonel (2013), focused on the description and evaluation of
perceptional learning style, study habits and academic performance of the college
students at Kalinga-Apayao State college, Philippines. The study includes 100 college
students enrolled during second semester of 2013 at Kalinga Apayao colleges. The
results showed that 46% of the students are have desirable learning through visual
style, 36% prefer auditory and 18% prefer tactile style of learning.
Additionally, the study of Magulod (2019) learning styles, study habbits and
academic performance of Filipino University students in applied science courses,
examines the learning style preferences of students enrolled in applied science courses
of one campus of a public higher education institution in the Philippines. The study
found out that the student respondents in applied science course preferred visual and
kinesthetic learning styles as major learning style
This study focuses and aims to identify the learning styles of the senior high
school students and their academic performance. The study aims to identify the
relationship between SHS learning styles and their academic performances.
Majority of the study agrees that the use of visual and kinesthetic learning
style is the most effective way on how the students learn. Also, the study agrees that
the learning style has significant correlations with the academic achievement of the
student. In contrast, some of the study indicated that there is no significant
relationship in the academic achievement of the students that correspond to their
preferred learning style.
15
The study is conducted to investigate the relationship between learning style
and academic performance among senior high school students. Future studies on this
topic should continue to investigate whether teaching strategy correlate to the learning
style of the student and to their academic performance. Furthermore, due to a small
number of respondents, it is anticipated that future researchers will consider bigger
number of respondents in which results can be different and more accurate the results
of this study.
Overall, the study aims to conduct a quality quantitative researched that will
give the beneficiaries an idea regarding the learning styles of the senior high school
students and its correlation to their academic performances. Furthermore, this study
will help the students to identify their preferred learning style and to help them
develop it and to focus on that strength of them.
Conceptual Paradigm of the Study
Independent Variable Dependents Variable
1. Demographic
Profile
2. Learning Style Academic
Performance
2.1Visual
1stgrading Period in
2.2Auditory S.Y 2019-2020.
2.3 Kinesthetic
Figure 1: Relationship between learning style and academic performances of SHS.
16
According to Regoniel (2015), conceptual framework represents the researcher’s
syntheses of literature on how to explain a phenomenon. It maps out actions required
in the course of study given his previous knowledge of other researcher’s point of
view and his observation on the subject of research. Statistically speaking, the
conceptual framework describes the relationship of the variables identified in the
study. The conceptual framework is also called the research paradigm
In the independent variable, the researcher used rectangular shape because they
are manifest variables wherein the variables can be measured easily. Inside the
rectangle the independent variable are the demographic profile and the learning style
which is the visual, auditory and kinesthetic (VAK).
On the other hand, the dependent variable is putted on the oval shape for latent
variable wherein the variables cannot be measured easily which is the academic
performance of the grade 11 senior high school student in the 1st grading period in
school year 2019-2020.
Hypothesis of the Study
The learning style of senior high school students has no significant
relationship to their academic performance
17
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter explained the method adopted by this research. This chapter
mentioned every component involved in conducting this research from selecting
participants, research design and sampling techniques used for the survey. Finally,
this paper provides a detailed explanation of the selected mode of analysis used and
data collection method.
Methods and technique of the Study
The researchers used quantitative research method. A quantitative research is
defined as the systematic investigation of phenomena by gathering quantifiable data
and performing statistical, mathematical or computational techniques. The researchers
used the descriptive correlation as a research design
A descriptive correlation study is a type of research design where a researcher
used to understand if there is a correlation and what kind of relationships naturally
occurring variables have with one another. In other words, correlation research is used
to determine if two or more variables are related and, if there is, in what way Mertler
((2016) define descriptive research as a non-experimental research design that
embody a group of techniques used to conduct quantitative research where there is no
manipulation done to any variable in the study. Mertler (2016) also states that in a
descriptive research, the researcher simply studying the phenomenon of interest as it
exists naturally, no attempt to manipulate the individuals, condition, or it is used to
describe and interpret, the current status of individuals, settings conditions of events
18
This research design will help to understand what a variable is. Variables can
be seen as topics of interest that can take on different values. A naturally occurring
variable is a variable that has not undergone any manipulation by the researcher. Data
are gathered from multiple variables then correlation statistical techniques are applied
to the gathered data.
Sampling technique
To determine the number of respondents that will be taken from grade 11
senior high school student, proportional stratified sampling technique was used.
Johnson & Christensen (2014) define proportional sampling technique as a sampling
technique in which the sample proportion is made to be the same as the population
proportion in the stratification variable.
Population and Sample of the study
Variable
Sex Frequency Percentage
Male 54 40.3
Female 80 59.7
Age Frequency Percentage
15 – 17 116 86.57
18 – 20 16 11.94
Above 20 2 1.49
19
This study was conducted to the total number of 134 respondents among grade
11 senior high school students, age range 15-20 years old, male and female in Vicente
P. Trinidad National High School located at Ruby St., Phase V, Sta. Lucia Village
Punturin Valenzuela City, specifically in senior high school department. The building
of senior high school was built last May 2014. It is a four-storey building that is
consists of seven classrooms for the accommodation of the learners in each academic
strand they had offered namely: General Academic Strand (GAS), Technical
Vocational and Livelihood (TVL), and lastly the Accountancy, Business and
Management (ABM). Each strand has one section per year level.
Research Instrument
The researchers used a standardized test which was used by the previous
researcher therefore the test used has been tested. The researchers are just
contextualized the question according to the respondents which are the grade 11
senior high school students of Vicente P. Trinidad National High School.
Specifically, the research instrument used in the study is consists of three
sections: section one is for visual learning style, section two is for auditory learning
style and section three is for kinesthetic. Each question has a range of 5-1. Each
category or range stands for ALWAYS (5), VERY OFTEN (4), SOMETIMES (3),
RARELY (2) and NEVER (1).
20
Data gathering procedure
The researchers asked permission from the grade 11 student-respondents of
this research study with the help of the letter of consent signed by the teachers and the
principal. The respondents will be given a questionnaire. They will write their answer
on questionnaires itself. If the respondents are done answering the questions, their
papers will be collected, and the researcher will give their appreciation to the
respondents for cooperating. The result of the collected papers will be the researcher’s
basis for the analysis, interpretation, findings, conclusion and recommendations of the
study.
The researcher used a survey questionnaire as major instrument to collect
data and information. This questionnaire is designed to acquire information on the
learning style of senior high school student and their academic performance. All
surveys were structured; it is a document that consists of a set of standardized
questions which specifies the exact wording and order of the questions, for gathering
information from respondents. The survey was conducted with the total number of
grade 11 senior high school students. The survey questions focus to the different
learning styles of the students.
Data Processing and Statistical Treatment
To determine the relationship between learning style and the academic
performance of the senior high school students, this study used Pearson Correlation
Coefficient as a statistical treatment. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a technique
for investigating the relationship between quantitative, continuous variable. Pearson
correlation coefficient is a measure of strength of the association between the two
variables (O’Loughlin E., 2015).
21
CHAPTER IV
DATA PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION
This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of data which were
obtained through survey questionnaire pertaining to the specific problems posed by
the study. All information from Vicente P. Trinidad National High School were
tabulated and analyzed and data were organized in tabular form.
Table 1
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents by Personal Profile
Variable
Sex Frequency Percentage
Male 54 40.3
Female 80 59.7
Age Frequency Percentage
15 – 17 116 86.57
18 – 20 16 11.94
Above 20 2 1.49
N = 134
Table 1 shows the description of personal profile of the senior high school
respondents.
22
In terms of age variables, students ranging 15-17 years old is the dominant
among population with the total number of 116 out of 134 respondents with the
frequency of 86.57%.On the contrary, students whose age ranging above 20 has the
least respondents of 2 with the frequency of 1.49%.On one hand, students whose age
is 16 is the most dominant among ages of 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, and 22, representing the
mode with relative frequency of 60%. The group is considered teenager with the mid
age of 18 years old
For the gender variable, it is indicated that there are more female compared to
male by the frequency distribution of 80 for female and 54 for male. It also indicates
that the senior high school student respondent is 60% female and 40% male.
Table 2
Frequency Distribution on Responses Academic Performance
Range Description Frequency Mean Percentage
90 – 100 Outstanding 7 92.43 5.22
85 – 89 Very 35 86.71 26.12
Satisfactory
80 – 84 Satisfactory 54 81.85 40.30
75 – 79 Fairly 37 77.68 27.61
Satisfactory
Below 75 Did Not Meet 1 70.00 0.75
Expectations
N = 134
23
The Table 2, Shows the frequency distribution of the general average of the
senior high school students of Vicente P. Trinidad National High School in the first
grading period, school year 2019-2020 of their academic performance.
Based on the data presents on the table, majority of the senior high school
students are having satisfactory average with the frequency of 54 ranging to 80-84 %.
Moreover, most of the students are in the middle average of below 75 (did not meet
expectation) which has 0.75 percent and ranging 90-100 (outstanding) with 5.22 %.
The findings indicate that most of the senior high school students are on average state
in terms of academic performance in acquiring knowledge; not excelling higher nor
failing too low but in the middle of two.
Table 3
Summary of Respondents’ Learning Style
Learning Style Point Average Descriptive
Equivalent
3.47 To a very great extent
Visual
Auditory 3.31 To a great extent
Kinesthetic 3.32 To a great extent
24
The table 3 presents the summary of respondents learning style in terms of
visual, auditory and kinesthetic (VAK).
Based on the table, the visual learning style has the highest point average in
the conducted survey. A point average of 3.47 signifies that most of the senior high
school students prefer to learn using images, text and other visual materials. On the
same hands, kinesthetic is the second preferred learning style at point average of 3.32
which means that the senior high school students also comfortable to learn things by
applying and performing it handily. On the other hand, auditory learning style with
the total average of 3.31 is the least preferred learning style of the student’s which
means that not most of the senior high school students prefer to learn by listening oral
lectures and other auditory materials.
The findings of the result of the conducted survey on the most preferred
learning style of the senior high school students indicates that majority of the said
students are more acquiring knowledge through visualization. It means that using
images, texts, arts, and other forms of visual learning materials help the students
understand and gain more knowledge.
25
Table 4
The relationship between Learning Style and Academic Performance
Performance Interpretation
Pearson Correlation -.154
No Not
Visual Sig. (2-tailed) .075
Correlation Significant
N 134
Pearson Correlation .004
\ No Not
Auditory .968 Significant
Sig. (2-tailed) Correlation
N 134
Pearson Correlation -.035
No Not
Kinesthetic Sig. (2-tailed) .691
Correlation Significant
N 134
A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was computed to assess the
relationship between the learning style and the academic performance. The result
shows that there is a negligible correlation between the two variables: Visual (r = -
.154, n = 134, p =.075), Auditory (r = -.004, n =134, p= .968), Kinesthetic (r= -.035,
n= 134, p=.691)
26
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This chapter presents the summary of the study, the presentation of findings,
conclusion and recommendations derived from analysis and interpretation of data
presented in the previous chapter.
Findings
The general problem of the study is: Is there a significant relationship between
learning style and academic performance of senior high school students?
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:
It is indicated that there are more female compared to the male respondent in
grade 11 studying in Vicente P. Trinidad National High school. Based on the result,
the common age of the grade 11 students is sixteen years old. Few respondents
belong to eighteen years old.
This finding is supported by the study of Wehrwein et.,al (2007), conducted a
gender differences learning style preference among Undergraduate Physiology
Students. 48 out of 86 (55.8%) students, where female is 54.2% and male is 12.5 who
returned the survey. Questionnaire indicates that among students, 4.2% preferred
visual learning style, 16.7% prefer reading & writing and 33% preferred kinesthetic
while 0% preferred auditory.
2. What is the academic performance of the students-respondents in the 1st
grading period?
27
The findings indicate that most of the senior high school students are on
average state in terms of academic performance in acquiring knowledge; not excelling
higher nor failing too low but in the middle of two.
3. What is the preferred learning style of senior high school students?
Most of the senior high school students prefer to learn using images, text, and
other visual materials. On the same hand, kinesthetic is the second preferred learning
style which indicates that they also comfortable in applying the learning handily. On
the other hands, the least prefer is the auditory learning style which means that not
most of the students prefer listening, oral lectures and other auditory materials.
Furthermore, the finding indicates that majority of the said students are more
acquiring knowledge through visualization. It means that using images, texts, arts, and
other forms of visual learning materials help the students understand and gain more
knowledge.
In similar to the result, the study of Amad F., et al. (2009), determines the
most dominate learning styles of students taking English paper in SMK TengkuIntan
Zahara and if the teachers were aware of these learning styles. The study used cluster
random sampling among 60 selected form 4 students and 48 form 5 students. The
study found out that the most preferred learning styles of the students is visual
learning style and also the study showed that the teachers were aware of the students
preferred learning styles and tried their best to match their teaching styles to
synchronize the student preferences.
Additionally, the study of Magulod (2019) learning styles, study habbits and
academic performance of Filipino University students in applied science courses,
examines the learning style preferences of students enrolled in applied science courses
28
of one campus of a public higher education institution in the Philippines. The study
found out that the student respondents in applied science course preferred visual and
kinesthetic learning styes as major learning style
4. Is there a significant relationship between the learning style and the academic
performance of the senior high school students?
The result of the study indicates no relationship between the learning style and
the academic performance of the grade 11 students.
On one hand, the study of Katowa-Mukwato et. al (2017) is similar to the result
of the study. It determines the learning styles and intelligence types and academic
performance of nursing students of the University of Zambia. Data was collected
using the VARK questionnaire proposed by Neil Fleming. The result finds out there
is negative correlation and no significant association with the academic performance
of the student. The negative correlation of the two variables indicates that the
teaching methods really affect the performance of students without necessarily
favoring a specific learning style.
Conclusions
The demographic profile of the students indicated that more female
compared to the male respondents are enrolled in Vicente P. Trinidad National
High School. While, in terms of age, the common age of the grade 11 students is
sixteen years old.
While in the academic performance of grade 11students is in the
average level. Based on the findings, although they are not that excellent at all
most of them are doing their best not to have a failing remark in every quarter.
29
Majority of the student-respondents are visual learners wherein they
prefer to learn easily using images, texts, arts, and other forms of visual learning
materials help the students understand and gain more knowledge
There is no relationship between the learning style and the Academic
Performance of the grade 11 Senior high school students. Therefore, accept the
null hypothesis. This indicates that there are more possible variables that may
affect the academic performance of senior high school students in Vicente P.
Trinidad National High School aside from learning style.
Overall, the researcher concluded that although the senior high
school students have a preferred learning style which is visual learning style, it is
still has no correlation with the academic performance because in senior high
school curriculum, not all the subject, visual can be apply. There are applied
subjects that are needed another learning styles. For instance, the Cookery,
Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Practical Research,
Accounting, and Personality Development are subjects that needed an application
work.
Recommendation
Based on the foregoing findings and conclusions, the following
recommendations are humbly offered:
Students- This study informing the grade 11 students of senior high school in
Vicente P. Trinidad National High School that there preferred learning style was
visual learning style. In that point, they will focus on that strength of them. So that it
will help them to learn more easily.
30
Schools administrators and teachers- Since the study finds out that the
preferred learning styles of grade 11 senior high school students was visual learning
style, the researchers suggest to the school administrators and teachers to use visual
materials such as: visual aids, text, images and drawing that will make students learn
easily. For the teachers, it is primary concern for them to know the preferred learning
style of their students so they can develop better teaching strategy to enhance student
ways of processing information.
Future researchers- It is recommended for the future researchers to conduct
further study about other variables that affects the student academic performance
aside from learning style. Moreover, this study suggests the future researcher to focus
on the delimitations that were mentioned on the previous pages. In addition to that,
since the researchers focused only to the three learning styles which are visual,
kinesthetic and auditory (VAK), the future researcher may focus on the other learning
style that may affect or have a relationship with academic performance.
31
Reference
Amad F., Mulalic A., Shah P. (2009). Learning Style Preference of ESL Students.
[Link]
STYLE_PREFERENCE_OF_ESL_STUDENTS.
Brown A. (1984) Metacognition, executive control, self- regulation, and other more
mysterious mechanisms. Metacognition, motivation, and understanding pp.65-
116. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Flavell, J.H. (1987) Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition.
Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding pp.21-29. –In F.E Weinert and
R.H Kluwe (Eds); (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum)
Gardner H. (1987). Multiple Inteligences. Retrieved from
[Link]
Graff, Liu &Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of Learner’s Navigational Behavior and Their
Learning Style in an Online Course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
26(2), 116-131. Wiley. Retrieved January 30 2020
Https://Www/[Link]/P/108289/.
Ibrahim R.H. and Hussein D. (2016). Assessment of Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic
Learning Style Among Undergraduate Nursing Students. International Journal
of Advanced Nursing Studies. Retrived from
[Link]/[Link]: 1014419/ijans.v5il5124
Katowa-Mukwato P., Chapima F., Victoria B. (2017). Learning style and intelligent
types versus academic performance of nursing students of the University of
32
Zambia. Journal of nursing Education and Practice 7 (10), 83-90, 2017.
[Link]
Learning_style_and_intelligence_types_versus_academic_performance_of_nu
rsing_students_of_the_university_of_Zambia/links/5bf71a73458515a69e34ab
b2/Learning-styles-and-intelligence-types-versus-academic-performance-of-
[Link]
Magulod G.C., Jr (2019). Filipino University students in applied science courses:
Implications for instruction.
[Link]
habits_and_academic_performance_of_Filipino_University_students_in_appli
ed_science_courses_Implications_for_instruction/
Magulod G.C., Jr (2019).Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of
Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for
instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-
[Link] from https:/[Link]/10.3926/jotse.504
Mertler, C.A. (2016). Introduction to Educational Research(2nd ed.). Los Angeles,
Arizona: SAGE PublicationInc Easy Steps.
[Link]
statistics/correlation-coefficient-formula/
Papert S. (1980). Mindstorms Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York:
Basic Books.
33
Prashnig B. (2005). Learninng Styles in Action. Retrived from
[Link]
Prashnig/dp/1855392089
Erica W., Heidi L., & Stephen D. Gender Differences in Learning Style Preferences
among Undergraduate Physiology Students. Retrieved from
[Link]
Regoniel P. (2015). Conceptual Framework: A Step by Stepv Guide on How to Make
One. [Link]
guide/?fbclid=IwAR3gxVxxNdj_UhhYG41n5wMaUTUkJYz6AXqrgMG-
3FWpLFgyL_p2GBKnPaM
O’Briens (1985). Learning Style. Retrieve from [Link]
34
APPENDICES
A. Letter to the Respondents
35
B. Research Instrument
Part I. Name: __________________________
Direction: Put check or write down your answer on the given line.
Gender:
( ) Male
( ) Female
Age: ___
Average in 1st Grading Period: ___
Part II. This is an adaptation of questionnaire by O’ Brien (1985).
Direction: Read each sentence carefully and consider if it applies to you. Check the
appropriate box to indicate your response. Each category stands for ALWAYS (5),
VERY OFTEN (4), SOMETIMES (3), RARELY (2) and NEVER (1).
No. STATEMENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 I enjoy doodling and even lots of picture and arrows in them.
2 I remember something better if I write it down.
3 I get lost or am late if someone tells me how to get to a new place, and I don’t write down the direction.
4 When trying to remember someone’s telephone or something new like that, It helps me to get picture of it in my
mind.
5 If I am taking a test, I can “see” the textbook page and where the answer is located.
6 It helps me to look at the person while listening; it keeps me focused.
7 Using flashcard helps me to retain material for tests.
8 It’s hard for me to understand what a person is saying when there are people talking or music playing.
9 It’s hard for me to understand a joke when someone tells me.
10 It’s better for me to get work done in a quiet place.
SECTION ONE: VISUAL
AVERAGE:
No. STATEMENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 My written work doesn’t look neat to me. My papers have crossed-out words and erasures.
2 It helps to use my finger as a printer when reading to keep my place.
3 Papers with very small print, blotchy dittos or poor copies are tough on me.
4 I understand how to do something if someone tells me, rather than having to read the same thing to myself.
5 I remember things that I hear, rather than things I see or read.
6 Writing is tiring. I press down too hard with my pen or pencil.
7 My eyes get tired fast, even though the eye doctor says that my eyes are not ok.
8 When I read, I mix up words that look alike, such as “them” and “then”, “bad” and “dad”.
9 It’s hard for me to read other people’s handwriting.
10 If I had the choice to learn new information through a lecture or textbooks, I would choose to hear it rather
that read it.
36
SECTION TWO: AUDITORY
AVERAGE:
SECTION THREE: KINESTHETIC
No. STATEMENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 I don’t like to read directions; I’d rather just start doing.
2 I learn best when I am shown how to do something, and I have the opportunity to do it.
3 Studying at a desk is not for me.
4 I tend to solve problems through a more trial and error approach, rather than from a step by step method.
5 Before I follow directions, it helps me to see someone else do it first.
6 I find myself needing frequent breaks while studying.
7 Using flashcard helps me to retain material for tests.
8 I do not become easily lost, even in strange surroundi9ngs.
9 I think better when I have the freedom to remove around.
10 When I can’t think of a specific word, I’ll use my hands a lot and call something a “what-cha-ma-call-it” or a
“thing-a-man-jig”.
AVERAGE:
The research instrument is consists of three sections: section one is for visual
learning style, section two is for auditory learning style and section three is for
kinesthetic. Each question has a range of 5-1. Each category or range stands for
ALWAYS (5), VERY OFTEN (4), SOMETIMES (3), RARELY (2) and NEVER (1).
This questionnaire is an adaptation of Learning Style Questionnaire by O’
Brien (1985).
37
C. Certificate of Plagiarism
38
D. Certificate of Grammar Check
39
E. Certificate of Statistics Check
40
F. Defense Document