0% found this document useful (0 votes)
414 views22 pages

Design for Excellence in Product Development

The document discusses design for manufacturing (DFM) and design for assembly (DFA). DFM aims to optimize manufacturing processes during design to reduce costs. DFA focuses on optimizing part and system assembly through principles like minimizing parts, using self-locating features, and standardizing fasteners. Examples demonstrate how redesigning products using DFM and DFA principles can significantly reduce assembly time, part counts, and overall manufacturing costs.

Uploaded by

Karandeep Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
414 views22 pages

Design for Excellence in Product Development

The document discusses design for manufacturing (DFM) and design for assembly (DFA). DFM aims to optimize manufacturing processes during design to reduce costs. DFA focuses on optimizing part and system assembly through principles like minimizing parts, using self-locating features, and standardizing fasteners. Examples demonstrate how redesigning products using DFM and DFA principles can significantly reduce assembly time, part counts, and overall manufacturing costs.

Uploaded by

Karandeep Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Design for Excellence (DFX)
  • Design for Manufacturing (DFM)
  • Design for Assembly (DFA)

Lesson 14

Product Design and Development


Design for X (DFX)
Dr. Inderdeep Singh
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

1
Design for Excellence (DFX)
• Design for Excellence or DFX is a systematic design approach that entails
wide range of guidelines and standards focused on optimizing the product
realization lifecycle.

• In reality, the term DFX is better thought of as Design for “X” where the
variable X is interchangeable with one of many values depending on the
particular objectives of the venture.
Design for Excellence (DFX) cont..

These guideline ensures the issues related to manufacturing, cost, quality,


assembly and serviceability are addressed at the design stage.

If these guidelines are not adhered during the design stage, it can lead to
engineering changes occurring at later stages of product lifecycle which are
highly expensive and can cause product delays and cost over-runs.
Some of the most common
substitutes for X includes: Design for
Assembly

Design for Design for


• Design for Manufacturing Reliability Manufacturing

(DFM)

• Design for Assembly (DFA)


Design for
Manufacturing
and Assembly DFX Design for
Production

• Design for Manufacturability


and Assembly (DFMA) Design for
Safety
Design for Cost

Design for

• Design for Production


Service
Design for Manufacturing

Definition
“DFM is the method of design for ease of manufacturing of the collection
of parts that will form the product after assembly”

“Optimization of the manufacturing process”


Design for Manufacturing cont..

• Design for manufacturing (DFM) is a development practice, emphasizing


manufacturing issues throughout the product development process.

• Successful DFM results in lower production cost without sacrificing


product quality.
Estimate the Manufacturing Costs
Equipment Information Tooling

Raw Materials

Labor Manufacturing
Finished Goods
Purchased
System
Components

Energy Supplies Services Waste

Source: Ulrich, K. & Eppinger, S. (2000). Product Design and Development. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Elements of the Manufacturing Cost of a Product

Manufacturing
Cost

Components Assembly Overhead

Equipment Indirect
Standard Custom Labor and Tooling Support
Allocation

Raw
Processing Tooling
Material
Manufacturing Cost of a Product
• Component Costs (parts of the product)
 Parts purchased from supplier
 Custom parts made in the manufacturer’s own plant or by suppliers according to the
manufacturer’s design specifications

• Assembly Costs (labor, equipment, & tooling)

• Overhead Costs (all other costs)


 Support Costs (material handling, quality assurance, purchasing, shipping, receiving,
facilities, etc.)
 Indirect Allocations (not directly linked to a particular product but must be paid for
to be in business)
Fixed Costs vs. Variable Costs

• Fixed Costs: incurred in a predetermined amount, regardless of number of


units produced (i.e. setting up the factory work area or cost of an injection
molding machine)

• Variable Costs: incurred in direct proportion to the number of units


produced (i.e. cost of raw materials)
Proposed Design

DFM Method Estimate the


Manufacutring Costs

Reduce the Costs of Reduce the Costs Reduce the Costs of


Components of Assembly Supporting Production

Consider the Impact of


DFM Decisions on
Other Factors

Recompute the
Manufacturing Costs

Good
N
enough
?
Y

Ulrich, K. & Eppinger, S. (2000). Product Design and Development. Boston,


Acceptable Design
MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
DFM Method

• Estimate the manufacturing costs.


• Reduce the costs of components.
• Reduce the costs of assembly.
• Reduce the costs of supporting production.
• Consider the impact of DFM decisions on other factors.
Example
• In a sheet-metal design, specifying hole sizes, locations, and their alignment is critical.
• It is always better to specify hole diameters that are greater than the sheet’s thickness (T).
• Spacing between holes also matters. It should be at least two times the sheet thickness
(2T), if not more.
• Distance between holes ensures strength of the metal and prevents holes from deforming
during the bending or forming processes.

Source: [Link]
Design for Assembly
(DFA)
Design for Assembly

Definition
DFA is the method of design of the product for ease of assembly.

“Optimization of the part/system assembly”


Design for Assembly cont..

• DFA is a tool used to assist the design teams in the design of products that
will transition to production at a minimum cost, focusing on the number of
parts, handling and ease of assembly.

.
Design for Assembly Principles
• Minimize part count
• Design parts with self-locating features
• Design parts with self-fastening features
• Minimize reorientation of parts during assembly
• Design parts for retrieval, handling, & insertion
• Emphasize ‘Top-Down’ assemblies
• Standardize parts…minimum use of fasteners.
• Encourage modular design
• Design for a base part to locate other components
• Design for component symmetry for insertion
Example 1

• Original design for a thermal


gunsight reticle in a US tank,
made by Texas Instruments,
Inc.

• There are a large number of


fasteners.

Source: Boothroyd, Dewhurst and Knight (1994)


• Redesigned thermal gunsight reticle:
simpler to assemble, and less to go
wrong!

Source: Boothroyd, Dewhurst and Knight (1994)


Measuring Improvement

Original Redesign Improvement

Assembly time (h) 2.15 0.33 84.7%

Number of different parts 24 8 66.7%

Total number of parts 47 12 74.5%

Total number of operations 58 13 77.6%

Metal fabrication time (h) 12.63 3.65 71.1%

Weight (lb) 0.48 0.26 45.8%


Example 2

• Redesign of
motor drive
assembly
following
design for
assembly
(DFA)
analysis.
Cost of Assembly Vs Cost of Part Manufacture
Saving Total Saving

Assembly Saving
(DFA)

Part Manufacture
Optimum Saving (DFM)

Part Count Reduction

You might also like