Concerned Dam Photograph

Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP)

Inspection Report of …… … Name of Dam

… ……
Doc. No.:

Agency
………….(Month),………(Year) Logo

Name of Agency / Department

Name of State
Quality Control:

Version Date Writers/Contributors Checked by

Issued/Copied to:

I/C Date Name Organisation

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. General.....................................................................................................................................2
2. Salient features........................................................................................................................3
3. Geology.....................................................................................................................................3
4. Hydrological Safety Review....................................................................................................3
5. Issues in Dam and Appurtenant Structures..........................................................................4
6. Concrete / Masonry Dams / Spillway....................................................................................5
7. Hydro-Mechanical Items........................................................................................................5
8. Instrumentation, Surveillance, SCADA and Data Transfer...............................................6
9. Recommended Investigations.................................................................................................6
10. Non-Structural Measures.......................................................................................................7
11. Operation and Maintenance Manual....................................................................................8
12. Security Arrangement for Dam and Dam Appurtenances..................................................8
13. Basic Dam Facilities................................................................................................................8
14. Sources of Secondary Revenue Generation..........................................................................8
15. Final Recommendations..........................................................................................................9
16. Important Documents to be Annexed....................................................................................9
17. Photographs.............................................................................................................................9
18. References................................................................................................................................9
Annexures

Annexure-I: Structures, Features, Events And Evidence To Be Examined During

Inspections......................................................................................................................................10
Annexure-II: Scheduled Dam Safety Inspection Form..............................................................20
Annexure-III: Checklist Of Various Instruments Installed On Large Dams..........................55
 Central Water Commission
Central Dam Safety Organisation

Format for Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP) Report

The basic purpose of DSRP inspection is to bring out overall safety aspects of the dam
and its appurtenant structures. This report must cover all important distresses in a dam
which require short and long term rehabilitation measures to ensure the safety of dam and
its appurtenances structures, population, property and environment on downstream of
dam. This report is the sole document, based on which Project Screening Template (PST)
is to be developed by dam owner citing experts recommendations linked with various
kind of rehabilitation measures along with estimated cost to firm up the proposal for
rehabilitation of dam and its appurtenances under next phase of DRIP.

The role of DSRP is very important while inspecting each component of a given dam
thoroughly. The dam in-charge may invite all experienced staff who are involved in day
to day operation and maintenance activities of dam operating various parts of dam to
interact with DSRP experts who may be very important source of information for few of
the issues dam is facing. Also, retired personnel who were engaged in dam
construction/important dam rehabilitation/expert studies etc. may also be invited (if
possible) by dam owner to give complete over view of the past history of dam to the
DSRP.

Each DSRP Expert is supposed to carry high resolution camera in order to take important
photographs of the inspected part of the dam, and needs to make photographs related to
distresses as part of Inspection Report. The Dam Safety Organisation or Incharge of
Safety Inspection of given dams of a State/Agency, is supposed to have balance
composition of DSRP Experts as per the “Guidelines For Safety Inspection of Dams,
CWC, 2018” in order to ensure bankable Safety Inspection of a given dam which may be
used for framing a proper rehabilitation plan during the project execution.

The Inspection Report of DSRP shall cover the details about specific kind of distressed
being faced by individual dam component/dam appurtenances, past rehabilitations, past
safety inspection records, challenges anticipated during the proposed rehabilitations,

Page 1 of 59
reasons for not implementing the past rehabilitation measures for a given dam etc. need to
be brought out clearly in the report.

The DSRP is supposed to give adequate time while inspecting the dam, shall inspect
main dam body, any geological issues in the dam foundation or abutments, any
deformation within the dam, spillway glacis and gates with hoisting mechanism,
foundation as well as other drainage galleries, energy dissipating arrangement, block
joints, all instruments, seepage through dam body and its measurement history, its
variation with respect to varying reservoir water levels, uplift pressure measuring gauges,
sump well, any cracks inside the gallery or dam body, abutment joints or joint between
the overflow and non-overflow section, standby power arrangement, SCADA,
Surveillance, Security system etc. as per the details given in the relevant Guidelines.

The prime objective of sharing this standardized format is to ensure uniformity in the
DSRP Reports across the Country, as well as ensure availability of important facts and
findings in the report in order to ensure sound planning of proposed measures. DSRP
report needs to use only MKS system of units. The all members of DSRP may also refer
important the Guidelines for Safety Inspection of Dams published by CWC in year 2018
as referred in the preceding Para. List of guidelines published recently by CWC is
available on official web site [Link].

A brief summary of items to be covered in DSRP Report is given as under.

1. GENERAL
a) Brief construction history with starting date and date of commissioning of the
project, detail of any important incident in the dam history i.e. may be dam
failure, any past operational failure, any other incident related to dam safety etc.
b) Summary of Annual Pre and Post Monsoon Dam Safety Inspections conducted.
If yes, summary of last five year reports giving the details of category of dam
(Category I/Category II/Category III)... Any Comprehensive Dam Safety
Inspection done in the past, if so, brief summary with recommendations.
c) Brief summary of past safety recommendations, rehabilitation works,
modifications done in the past alongwith brief chronology of any expert
investigations/testings etc.

Page 2 of 59
2. SALIENT FEATURES
Important Salient Features to be appended as Annexure.

3. GEOLOGY
This para will provide guidance to enhance the communication of geologic
conditions and environment, construction methods, foundation treatment and
foundation/ structure performance over time in order to reduce uncertainty and
improve estimates of foundation performance for dam safety. The important task
of evaluating, summarizing and portrayal of this geological and geotechnical
information is essential for planning rehabilitations, estimating risk, and has
always been an important aspect for all dam designs, as well as safety programs.
Any recent development noticed by dam engineers regarding orientation,
width/spacing of discontinuities (joints, shears, bedding, faults), infilling
characteristics of discontinuities (extent, physical properties), continuity of open
joints, shears, bedding, faults etc, leading to excessive leakage in foundation need
to be brought out.

4. HYDROLOGICAL SAFETY REVIEW

a) General
Gross storage (MCM), Live Storage (MCM), Height of dam above river bed
(m) and deepest foundation level (m), category of dam (small/ Intermediate/
large), recommended design flood (Return Period Flood/ SPF/PMF)
b) Design Flood Review
Original design flood (cumec), Outflow Design Flood (cumec), Spillway
design rating curve, Design Flood Review chronology, if any, Append past
DFR reports, Highest historical observed discharge (cumec), Any dam
specific Flood Regulation Manual/Guidelines/Procedures in place (if yes,
details thereof, copy needs to appended), Early Flood Warning System,
Final Recommendation for Design Flood Review
In case dam has more than one spillway, i.e., main spillway, auxiliary
spillway/emergency spillway, fuse plug etc., its design details, design flood
capacity of each of these spillway, expert review, recommendations, etc.

Page 3 of 59
 c) Reservoir Sedimentation Review
Sediment Inflow
Original rate of sediment planning in mm/year, bathymetric survey detail,
actual rate of sediment in flow in mm/year, detail of capacity loss, sediment
problem classification (In significant/Significant/Serious) any silt
management measurement proposed with detailed justification, history of
any Expert Group Review the past, and Recommendations
De-siltation Aspect (if any)
Background, Reasons for de-siltation proposed, Bathymetry survey must be
emphasised before Feasibility Report, Feasibility Report as per published
Guidelines (if any expert assistance required or can be prepared in-house),
and Recommendations
d) Water Quality Aspects
Paragraph on Water Quality of Reservoir, Problem including a description
and its history, Water Quality Test(s), Nature of Water (Acidic/
neutral/Basic), Cause of Problem, Its Impacts on Dam body, H-M system,
Power Plant and appurtenances etc., Any Expert Group Recommendation in
the past, Appendices for all such Reports, Recommendations

5. ISSUES IN DAM AND APPURTENANT STRUCTURES

Regarding this Para, DSRP Experts are advised to refer Guidelines for Safety
Inspection of Dams published by CWC in year 2018 for relevant detail. Although
brief summary of items are reproduced from the same guidelines under this Para
for reference. The details of “Structures, Features, Events and Evidence to be
examined during inspection” given in Annexure-I and “Schedule Dam Safety
Inspection Form” given in Annexure-II need to be referred by DSRP for filling and
reporting status of health of embankment/masonry/concrete dam and appurtenant
structures as a part of standard safety protocol in the DSRP report. However, a
brief outline of items to be addressed by the DSRP for safety assessment and
finalizing the rehabilitation plan for the dam are given as under.
i. Remedial works required to arrest seepage into intake wells, conduits of
outlets in embankment dams, etc.

Page 4 of 59
 ii. Repairs for drainage system, road at dam top, Chute drains on d/s face of
the dam and at the d/s areas of the dam, toe drains etc.
iii. Longitudinal / transverse cracks on the dam.
iv. Localized subsidence / settlement / sloughing.
v. Requirement of raising the dam height for revised flood.

6. CONCRETE / MASONRY DAMS / SPILLWAY

i. Any cracks/spalling/breaking of parapet walls at dam top
ii. Any cracks on downstream face or crest of dam
iii. Source of seepage at downstream from dam body, masonry joints, block
joints, and remedial measures.
iv. Source of seepage in the inspection/drainage /foundation gallery and
remedial measures.
v. Status of approaches, lighting, safety handrails and instrumentation in
galleries
vi. Adequacy of pumping for sump wells (with alternate source of power)

7. HYDRO-MECHANICAL ITEMS
i. Review of existing condition of Hydro-Mechanical works in terms of their
physical state, performance quality, functional deficiencies, structural
weakness and the necessary integrity tests for establishing the structural
soundness be proposed
ii. Whether timely servicing, maintenance, rehabilitation or replacement
exercises are being conducted in view of ageing and biological rusting of
old hydro-mechanical equipment
iii. Whether timely availability of spare parts, servicing lubricants, tools and
tackles, trained manpower, essential workshop facilities or the services of
empaneled vendors etc. can be mobilized immediately for emergencies?
iv. Whether meeting the automation requirements for Dam Safety?

Page 5 of 59
 v. Whether historical data on maintenance is available? Are the records like
original construction drawings and designs, records of modifications
adopted, maintenance records and frequencyavailable/accessible?
vi. Appraisal of deficiencies in servicing, maintenance and operational skills
noted during inspection and need for training requirements, if any,
proposed?
vii. Requirement of stop log, if not available

8. INSTRUMENTATION, SURVEILLANCE, SCADA AND DATA TRANSFER

a) Instrumentation
Existing state of instrumentation and their adequacy, need for additional
instrumentation including seismic instruments, automation, Data Management,
Digitization and archival of old instrumentation records, Training of field
personnel and other officers responsible for instrumentation etc., Linking of Data
and updating of Instrumentation Data base at State and National level, Feasibility
of Linking Dam Safety Instrumentation with SCADA, Surveillance Procedures
being adopted or needs to be adopted, Logistic constraints (availability of GPRS/
GSM/ VSAT, etc.)
b) SCADA
To control Gate opening and closing via SCADA based on Flood warning, Inputs
through wired and remote communication, To access Gate opening control via
Remote location, To troubleshoot problems in Gate control systems remotely
c) Instrumentation Data Capture, Transfer, Analysis and Evaluation
Review of existing data network adequacy, operation and maintenance system,
data recording, retrieval, analysis, and evaluation, Integrated data transfer network,
control room at dam site and Centralized Control Room etc.

9. RECOMMENDED INVESTIGATIONS
i. Geological / Geotechnical Investigations
a) Need for conducting Surface / Subsurface geological investigations
in case of non-availability of any past records for checking stability of

Page 6 of 59
 critically distressed dams and landslide/slope stability problems (if any),
in the given reservoir
b) Need of any special sampling investigations/testing for geological
weaknesses or area of concern in case of construction of additional
structures required for dam safety
c) Need for routine tests and special investigations required
ii. Special testing and investigation needs for safety problems being faced at
Dam site for reducing risk i.e. NDT as well as DT techniques to be done for
any special issue to be brought out clearly
iii. Geophysical Investigations
Seismic refraction, Electrical Resistivity, Sonic Tomography, Geo-Radar etc.
iv. Other Investigative Studies
a) Bathymetry (compulsory for de-silting for pre and post stage)
b) Under Water Scanning (through ROVs / Drivers)
c) Material Testing (destructive / non-destructive)
d) Physical Modeling in case of additional spillway, Energy Dissipating
Arrangement etc. any other important recommendation.

10. NON-STRUCTURAL MEASURES

Whether Dam Break Analysis (DBA), Emergency Action Plan (EAP) has been
completed as per latest “Guidelines for Developing Emergency Action Plans for
Dams”, released by CWC, January 2018, whether EAP has been shared with all
the stakeholders including Disaster Management Agencies, Whether Tabletop-
exercises have been carried out to test EAP procedures, Whether Warning System
has been installed in the dam and downstream villages with less than 2 hours of
warning time
Whether Integrated Early Flood Warning System is in place, Integrated Reservoir
Operation, Integrated Coordination with all Disaster Management Agencies,
protocols are published clear assigned roles and responsibilities, Whether Incident
Response Plan displayed at the entry gate of power station or not etc.

Page 7 of 59
11. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Availability of O&M Manuals and any revision required as per latest “Guidelines
for Preparing Operations and Maintenance Manuals for Dams, CWC, January
2018”, detail of official allocated annual O&M budget and expenditures incurred
for last 5 years in respect of dam maintenance excluding establishment
expenditure, detail of official as well as present establishment set up for dam
operation and maintenance, also reservoir operation protocols/rule curves in
practice, any water sharing agreement for the dam in place, when it was updated
last time etc.

12. SECURITY ARRANGEMENT FOR DAM AND DAM APPURTENANCES

All dams of national importance are supposed to have a fool proof security
arrangement in place to ensure security of dam and appurtenances from any kind of
man made threats. DSRP may interact with security in charge in place, may review
the Standard Operating protocols of this system. This arrangement shall be
reflected in Inspection Report.

13. BASIC DAM FACILITIES

The basic dam facilities covers the approach roads to dam, access roads to dam top
as well as road to downstream still basin arrangement, Guest House, proper
lighting within the dam complex as well as inside the various drainage galleries,
guest house, adequacy of staff quarters for permanent staff deputed to dam site
during normal as well as flood season, public conveniences, proper signage at
appropriate locations including proper numbering of blocks inside the inspection as
well as drainage galleries along with proper elevations, central control room
housing SCADA and Surveillance system along with instrumentation monitoring
etc. need to be reviewed by DSRP and shall be reflected in the Inspection Report.

14. SOURCES OF SECONDARY REVENUE GENERATION

Possibility of secondary revenue generation through tourism development,
fisheries, dam top solar power, secondary power, water sports, and recreation
facilities may be examined by DSRP and accordingly recommendation may be
made. While recommending tourism development, present location of dam from

Page 8 of 59
 nearby cities, its on way location to any major tourist destination etc. need to be
explored.

15. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

DSRP shall make a critical assessment of various deficiencies and examine them
rationally, discuss with project authorities about the critical issues as well as
proposed recommendations. Based on the discussion, Dam Safety Inspection,
DSRP shall prioritize the important recommendations for rehabilitation of given
dam.

16. IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS TO BE ANNEXED

Official order of DSRP constitution, General index map of river basin showing the
concerned dam, its upstream as well as downstream existing projects, project
layout, any expert report and its recommendations, any important
investigation/testing done after dam construction etc.

17. PHOTOGRAPHS
The Report should contain high resolution photographs of critical deficiencies
noted during the inspection in individual components giving the text title for each
photographs

18. REFERENCES

Page 9 of 59
 ANNEXURE-I:

STRUCTURES, FEATURES, EVENTS AND EVIDENCE TO BE EXAMINED DURING

INSPECTIONS1

1 General

The performance of dams and appurtenant structures is controlled by

(1) their designs,

(2) the characteristics of their constituent materials,
(3) the nature of their foundations, and
(4) their regional settings.

The fundamental objective of dam safety inspections is the detection of any

existing or developing structural of hydraulic weakness. In searching for
weaknesses, dam inspectors must recognize and understand the inter-relationship
of the demands which control performance.

2 Changes In The Characteristics Of Materials

2.1 General: Observe for defective, unsuited or deteriorated materials. A variety of

different materials makes up the different types of dams and appurtenances. The
quality and durability of these materials must always be determined in every
instance and the need for such critical examination and what to look for as listed in
this section are not normally repeated in the sections on specific structures.

2.2 Concrete
(1) Alkali – aggregate reaction, pattern of crushing and cracking
(2) Leaching
(3) Abrasion
(4) Spalling
(5) General deterioration
(6) Strength loss

2.3 Rock
(1) Degradation
(2) Softening
(3) Dissolution
2.4 Soils
1
This annexure is derived from the published Guideline for Safety Inspections of Dam, Chapter 10, Pages 175 – 183
(2018). The use of this abbreviated checklist serves as an “OK Card” for assurance that all aspects of the Dam
Safety Review Panel’s site inspection have been considered any project dam.

Page 10 of 59
 (1) Degradation,
(2) Dissolution
(3) Loss of plasticity
(4) Strength loss
(5) Mineralogical change

2.5 Soil-Cement
(1) Loss of cementation
(2) Crumbling

2.6 Metals
(1) Loss of cementation
(2) Corrosion
(3) Stress-corrosion
(4) Fatigue
(5) Tearing and rupture
(6) Galling
(7) Steels Chains, steel (wire ropes/pulleys-wear and tear, loss of greasing)

2.7 Timber
(1) Rotting
(2) Shrinkage
(3) Combustion
(4) Attack by organisms

2.8 Rubber
(1) Hardening
(2) Loss of elasticity
(3) Heat deterioration
(4) Chemical degradation

2.9 Joint-sealers
(1) Loss of plasticity
(2) Shrinkage
(3) Melting

3 Generic Occurrences

3.1 General: Observe occurrences for their characteristics, locations and frequency.
These occurrences are of a universal nature regardless of structure type of
foundation class. The details of what to look for in observing these occurrences,
actual or evidential, are not repeated in the sections on specific structures.

Page 11 of 59
3.2 Seepage and leakage
(1) Discharge - stage relationship
(2) Increasing or decreasing
(3) Turbidity and piping
(4) Colour
(5) Dissolved solids
(6) Location and pattern
(7) Temperature
(8) Taste
(9) Evidence of pressure
(10) Boils
(11) Frequency and duration

3.3 Drainage
(1) Obstructions
(2) Chemical precipitates and deposits
(3) Unimpeded outfall
(4) Sump pump facilities
(5) Bacterial growth

3.4 Cavitation
(1) Surface pitting
(2) Sonic evidence
(3) Vapour pockets

3.5 Stress and strain: Evidence and clues

(1) In concrete-cracks, crushing, displacements, offsets, shears and creep
(2) In steel-cracks, extensions, contractions, bending & buckling
(3) In timber crushing, buckling, bending, shears, extensions and compressions
(4) In rock and soils-cracks, displacements, settlement, consolidation,
subsidence, compression, zones of extension & compression

3.6 Stability, evidence and clues

(1) In concrete and structures – tilting, tipping, sliding & over turning
(2) In embankment structures, cut slopes natural slopes – building, sloughing,
slumping, sliding, cracks & escarpments
(3) In rock cut slopes, foundation and unlined tunnels – slumps, slides,
rockfalls, bulges & cracks

4 Operation and Maintenance

4.1 Service reliability of outlet, spillway sump pump mechanical – electrical features

Page 12 of 59
 (1) Broken or disconnected lift chains and cables
(2) Test operation including auxiliary power sources
(3) Reliability and service connections of primary sources
(4) Verification of operations understanding and ability to operate
(5) Case and assurance of access to control stations
(6) Functioning of lubrication systems

4.2 Gate chamber, galleries, tunnels and conduits

(1) Ventilation and heat control of damp, corrosive environment of mechanical
– electrical equipment

4.3 Accessibility visibility

(1) Obscuring & vegetal overgrowth
(2) Galleries-access ladders & lighting
(3) Access roads and bridges
(4) Communication and remote-control lines, cables and telemetering systems

4.4 Control of vegetation and burrowing animals

(1) Harmful vegetation in embankments-oversize & dead root channels
(2) Harmful vegetation in structural concrete joints
(3) Obstructing vegetal growth in hydraulic flow channels
(4) Ground squirrels, rats and beavers

5 Behaviour

5.1 Every attempt should be made to anticipate and have engineer observers present
on site at items of large spillway and outlet discharge. Resident operational
personnel can often supply valuable information and may be the only available
observers (during earthquakes) for example.

5.2 Warning, safety and performance instrumentation

(1) Piezometers, flow recorders, accelerometers, seismoscopes, joint meters &
gauge points, strain meters, stress meters, inclinometers, direct & inverted
plumb lines, surface reference monuments, stage recorders, extension meters.
(2) Serviceability
(3) Access to readout stations ·
(4) Type and location suitable for conditions being observed
(5) Need for recalibration
(6) Faulty readings, sources and reasons
(7) Alarm systems operable and at appropriate set points'
(8) Random check readings during inspections

Page 13 of 59
 (9) Quiz operators to determine their understanding of purpose and functioning of
instruments.

5.3 During and after large floods

(1) Drift marked high waterlines
(2) Evidence of taxed spillway capacity
(3) Undesirable or dangerous spillway flow patterns directly observed or deduced
from flow strains, erosion trails, swept vegetation & deposition of solids.

5.4 During and after large outlet releases

(1) Undesirable or dangerous spillway flow patterns, dynamic pressures, vibrations
& cavitation sonics.

5.5 After earthquakes

(1) Cracks, displacements, offsets in structural features
(2) Cracks, slumps, slides, displacements, settlements in embankments, cut
slopes and fill slopes.
(3) Broken stalactites in galleries, tunnels & chambers.
(4) Toppled mechanical equipment
(5) Sand boils.

6 Concrete Dams

(Any of these observations are applicable also to reservoir impounding power

intake structures, spillway control structures lock walls).

6.1 Stress and Strain: Evidence and clues

(1) Cracks, crushing, displacements, offsets in concrete monoliths, buttresses, face
slabs, arch barrels visible on exterior surfaces and in galleries, valve &
operating chambers and conduit interior surfaces.
(2) Typical stress and temperature crack patterns in buttresses, pilasters,
diaphragms and arch barrels.
(3) Retention of design forces in post tensioned anchorages and tendons.

6.2 Stability: Evidence and Clues

(1) Excessive or mal-distributed uplift pressures revealed by piezomete1s, pressure
spurts from foundation drain holes, construction joints and cracks.
(2) Differential displacements of adjacent months, buttresses and supported arch
barrels or face slabs.
(3) Disparities in region near the interface between arches and thrust blocks.
(4) Movement along construction joints.
(5) Uplift on horizontal surfaces revealed by seepage on downstream face and in
galleries at construction lift elevations.

Page 14 of 59
6.3 Hillsides and river channels adjacent to the abutments and river section foundation
along the downstream toe of the dam.
(1) Leakage
(2) Seepage
(3) Stability
(4) Boils

6.4 Special attention to stability and seepage control at discontinuities and junctures
(1) Embankment wraparound sections
(2) Water stops in monoliths and face slabs
(3) Reservoir impounding backfill at spillway control sections and retaining walls.

6.5 Foundation
(1) Piping of weathering products from old solution channels and rock joint
structure.
(2) Efficiency of foundation seepage control systems - drains, drainage holes, grout
curtains, cutoffs & drainage tunnels.
(3) History of shear zones, faults & cavernous openings.
(4) Zones of varying permeability
(5) Orientation of stratification and bedding planes - effect on permeability, uplift
& foundation stability.
(6) Subsurface erosion and piping.
(7) Thin weaker interbeds - effect on stability.

7 Embankment – Type Dams

7.1 Stress and strain: Evidence and clues

(1) Settlement
(2) Consolidation
(3) Subsidence
(4) compressibility
(5) Cracks, displacements, offsets, joint opening changes in concrete facing on
rockfills
(6) Loss of freeboard from settlement
(7) Zones of extension and compression visible along dam crest or elsewhere
(8) Crushing of rock points of contact
(9) Differential settlement of embankment cross sectional zones visible along dam
crest, indicating stress transfer along region of zone interface (increases
possibility of hydraulic fracturing).
(10) Dam top (crest)- drainage arrangement

Page 15 of 59
7.2 Stability: Evidence and clues
(1) Cracks, displacements, openings, offsets, sloughs, slides, bulges, escarpments
on embankment crest and slopes and on hillsides adjacent to abutments.
(2) Sags and misalignments in parapet walls, guardrails, longitudinal conduits or
other alignments parallel to embankment axis.
(3) Irregularities in alignment and variances from smooth, uniform face planes.
(4) Bulges in ground surfaces beyond toes of slopes.

7.3 Inadequate seepage control: Evidence and clues

(1) Wet spots
(2) New vegetal growth
(3) Seepage and leakage
(4) Boils
(5) Saturation patterns on slopes hillsides and in streambed
(6) Depressions and sinkholes
(7) Evidence of high escape gradients

7.4 Erosion control

(1) Loss, displacement & deterioration of upstream face riprap, underlayment and
downstream face slope protection.
(2) Leaching

7.5 Foundation
(1) See 6.5 also
(2) Consolidation
(3) Liquefaction

7.6 Other endangerments

(1) Utility pressure conducts on, over or through embankments.
(2) Diversion ditches along abutment hillsides.

8 Spillways

8.1 Approach channel

(1) Obstructions
(2) Slides slumps and cracks & cut slopes

8.2 Log booms

(1) Submergence
(2) Uncleared accumulated drift
(3) Parting
(4) Loss of anchorage

Page 16 of 59
 (5) Inadequate sleek for low reservoir stages.

8.3 Hydraulic control structure

(1) Stability
(2) Retention of capacity rating
(3) Erosion at toe
(4) Unauthorized installations on crest, raising storage level and decreasing spilling
capacity.
(5) Gate piers
(6) Trash control systems
(7) Nappe and crotch aeration
(8) Siphon prime settings
(9) Glacis- surface erosion, pitting, abrasion etc.

8.4 Headwater control (gates, flashboards, fuse plugs)

Unauthorized position
(1)
Wedging
(2)
Gate trunnion displacements
(3)
Loss of gate anchorage post-tensioning
(4)
Undesirable eccentric loads from variable positions of adjacent gates.
(5)
Gate-seal
(6)
Erosive seal leakage
(7)
Failure of system
(8)
Availability of bulkhead facilities for unwatering, and of cranes and lifting
(9)
beams.

8.5 Operating deck and hoists

(1) Broken or disconnected lift chains and cables
(2) Unprotected exposure of electrical-mechanical equipment to weather, sabotage,
vandalism.
(3) Structural members and connections.

8.6 Shafts, conduits and tunnels

(1) Vulnerability to obstruction
(2) Evidence of excessive external overloading-pressure jets contorted cross-
sections, cracks, displacements & circumferential joints.
(3) Serviceability of linings (concrete and steel), materials deterioration, cavitation
& erosions.
(4) Rockfalls
(5) Severe leakage about tunnel plugs
(6) Support system for pressure conduits in walk-in tunnels.

8.7 Bridges

Page 17 of 59
 (1) Possibility of collapse with consequent flow obstruction.
(2) Serviceability of operational and emergency equipment transport.

8.8 Discharge carrier (open channel or conduit)

(1) Vulnerability to obstruction
(2) Evidence of excessive external sidewall leading - large wall deflections, cracks,
differential deflections at vertical joints.
(3) Invert anchorage and foundation support – dummy soundings, buckled lining &
excessive uplift.
(4) Observation of evidence of dangerous hydraulic flow patterns – cross water,
inadequate freeboard, wall climb, unwetted surface, uneven distribution, ride up
on horizontal curves, negative pressures at vertical curves & pressure flow
deposition.
(5) Drain system serviceable
(6) Air injection and expulsion
(7) Tendency for jump formation in conduits
(8) Buckling & slipping of slope lining
(9) Erosion of unlined channels.

8.9 Terminal structures

(1) Inadequate dissipation of energy
(2) Jump sweep out
(3) Undercutting
(4) Retrogressive erosion
(5) Loss of foundation support for flip bucket substructure
(6) Unsafe jet trajectory and impingement
(7) Erosive endangerment of adjacent dam or other critical structures.

8.10 Return channels

(1) Impaired outfall
(2) Obstructions
(3) Slides, slumps & cracks in cut slopes
(4) Erosion of deposition creating dangerous tailwater elevations or velocities.
(5) Evidence of destructive eddy currents.

9 Outlets

9.1 Genera! : Many of the observations made of outlet components are similar in
nature and purpose to these made for spillway components, stilling basins for
example.

9.2 Approach channels (may seldom be directly visible and may require underwater
inspection).

Page 18 of 59
 (1) Siltation
(2) Underwater slides and slumps

9.3 Intake structure (including appended, inclined and free-standing towers with wet
and dry).
(1) Lack of dead storage
(2) Siltation
(3) Potential for burial by slides and slumps
(4) Damage or destruction of emergency and service bulkhead installation facilities
(5) Availability of bulkhead, cranes & lifting beams
(6) Serviceability of access bridges

9.4 Trash racks and raking equipment

(1) Clogging of bar spacing
(2) Lodged debris on horizontal surfaces
(3) Collapse

9.5 Gate chambers, gate valves, hoist controls electrical equipment, air demand ducts
(1) Accessibility to control station under all conditions
(2) Ventilation
(3) Unauthorized gate or valve positions
(4) Binding of gate seals ·
(5) Seizing
(6) Erosive seal leakage
(7) Failure of lubrication system
(8) Drainage arc sump pump serviceability
(9) Vulnerability to flooding under reservoir pressure through conduits, by passes
and gate bonnets surfacing in chamber.

9.6 Conduits and tunnels

(1) See 8.6 also
(2) Seepage or leakage along external periphery of conduit
(3) Extension strains in conduits extending through embankments
(4) Capacity and serviceability' of air relief and vacuum valves on conduits.

9.7 Terminal structures

See 8.9 above

9.8 Return channels

See 8.10 above

Page 19 of 59
 ANNEXURE-II

SCHEDULED DAM SAFETY INSPECTION FORM2

Part 1a - Inspection Details:

Dam Name: Project ID Code (PIC):

Dam Type: Dam Purpose:
Dam Owner: Hazard Classification:
Dam Operator: Type of Inspection:
Commissioning
Inspection by:
Date:
City/State/PIN: Date of Inspection:
Reservoir water level in
District: metre on the date of
inspection:
Storage Capacity (i) Gross ……..
Latitude:
(MCM): (ii) Live……
Longitude: Weather Conditions:
a) TBL RL …….
b) MWL RL ……………
c) FRL RL ……………..
Important
d) Spillway Crest RL …………
Controlling Level
e) MDDL RL ……………
f) Lowest River bed RL ……..
g) Deepest foundation level RL ………

2
This annexure is derived from the published Guideline for Safety Inspections of Dam, Appendix-B “Scheduled Dam Safety Inspection, Instructions and Forms,
Pages B-1 to B-12.

Page 20 of 59
 Part 1b - Inspection Remarks:
Please provide any additional information or comments not covered by Part 1a form above.

Page 21 of 59
 Part 2a - Inspection Checklist:

Response Observations and Conditionb

a
Sl. recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
Inspection Item
No. any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
Y N NA
inspecting officer Satisfactory)
A-Reservoir
A-1.1 General Condition
1.1.1 Is the reservoir water level unusually high or low?
1.1.2 Are there signs of decline in water quality?
1.1.3 Are there signs of recent sediment deposition?
1.1.4 Is floating debris present?
1.1.5 Any indications of major active or inactive landslide area in the
reservoir rim
If so, indicate their locations and extent.
1.1.6 Are there people or livestock in and around reservoir?
1.1.7 Any other issues?
B-Dam and Dam Reach (Embankment)
B-1.1 General Condition
1.1.1 Any major alterations or changes to the dam since the last
inspection?
1.1.2 Is there any new nearby development in the downstream
floodplain?
1.1.3 Any misalignment of poles, fencing or walls due to dam
movement?
B-1.2 Upstream Slope
1.2.1 Any signs of bulging or concavity (depressions)?
If so, indicate their locations and extent.
(Check up the cross-sections with tape and level at random
locations, at least two)

Page 22 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.2.2 Does the section of the dam and upstream slope appear inspecting officer Satisfactory)
structurally sound and stable?
1.2.3 Presence of longitudinal or transverse cracks?
1.2.4 Whether any signs of distress to stability of slopes noticed at
any time in any part of the dam?
If so, give brief details of the incidents and location, the method
of treatment adopted and its effectiveness.
Indicate the general condition of upstream pitching.
1.2.5 Any degradation to slope protection (rip-rap)?
1.2.6 Is there any profuse growth of bushes or weeds over any portion
of the dam?
If so, indicate the locations.
1.2.7 Does the upstream slope shows existence of crab holes or holes
made by rodents or burrowing animals or ant hills?
If so, indicate the locations.
1.2.8 Any other issues?
B-1.3 Crest of Dam
1.3.1 Is the crest profile at proper elevation?
(To be test checked at random locations by taking level)
1.3.2 Does it show any signs of excessive and/or uneven settlement?
If so, indicate such locations and extent of settlement.
(Surface settlement points must be installed for observing this
aspect)
1.3.3 Is the surface of the crest free from undulations and local
depressions or heaving?
1.3.4 Does it provide an all-weather road surface?
1.3.5 Any degradation to access road (sealed/unsealed)?

Page 23 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.3.6 Does it develop any visible cracks in transverse or longitudinal inspecting officer Satisfactory)
directions?
If so, attach a map showing their locations and extent. Depth of
cracks must be ascertained by taking open trenches extending
below the bottom of cracks.
1.3.7 What is the condition of the edges of crest? Have got eroded
and cut up resulting in reduced effective width?
1.3.8 Is the crest free from local slips throughout its length on either
sides?
1.3.9 Do the headers, guard stones and parapet wall provided at the
edges of the crest appear in proper profile and plumb?
1.3.10 Any degradation to upstream parapet or downstream curb wall?
1.3.11 Evidence of livestock on dam crest?
1.3.12 Trees or profuse growth of weeds/bushes at any location?
1.3.13 Proper lighting arrangement at dam top?
1.3.14 Any other issues?
B-1.4 Downstream Slope
1.4.1 Any signs of bulging or concavity (depressions)?
1.4.2 Are there any wet or slushy patches or any concentrated leaks,
springs or trickles observed on the downstream slopes or the
toe?
If so, indicate their locations and extent.
Please look out for patches of extensive vegetation growth and
examine them carefully and record the findings.
1.4.3 Presence of longitudinal or transverse cracks?
1.4.4 Any signs of distress to the stability of slopes?
1.4.5 Are rain cuts/erosion channels present at any location?

Page 24 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.4.6 Are all the rain cuts and erosion channels properly treated and inspecting officer Satisfactory)
made good? Please indicate location of recurring damages, if
any.
1.4.7 Is there any profuse growth of bushes or weeds over any portion
of the dam?
If so, indicate the locations.
1.4.8 Does the downstream slope shows existence of crab holes or
holes made by rodents or burrowing animals or ant hills? If so,
indicate the locations.
1.4.9 Any other degradation to slope protection (turfing)?
Indicate the general condition of downstream pitching/ turfing
and rock toe.
1.4.10 Is the downstream area clear of debris and free draining?
1.4.11 Any other issues?
B-1.5 Downstream Drainage
1.5.1 Are there any signs of water logging, slushy conditions or
growth of aquatic weeds on the downstream of the dam?
To be checked upto 300 m downstream of toe
1.5.2 Are there any standing pools of water in the downstream of
dam? If so, give their locations and extent.
To be checked upto 300 m downstream of toe
1.5.3 Are there any boils observed in the vicinity of the downstream
toe of the dam? If so, give locations.
1.5.4 Is the downstream area sufficiently clear and free draining?
1.5.5 What is the depth of ground water table on the downstream as a) Max. ground
evident from the existing wells in the vicinity of the dam water
To be checked upto 300 m downstream of toe. Does the water level………

Page 25 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
table show any marked variation in accordance with the b)inspecting officer
Location ……… Satisfactory)
variations in reservoir water level? c) Date…………
d) Corresponding
Reservoir level…
1.5.6 Are all the exposed drains working satisfactorily?
1.5.7 Toe drains and cross drains.
i. Are the portions of longitudinal toe drain and exposed
cross drains beyond the downstream toe of the dam in
regular section and freely draining?
ii. Is the pitching to these drains intact?
iii. Is there any weed growth in these drains?
iv. Indicate other defects noticed in the drains, if any.
1.5.8 Outfall Drain:
(a) Is the outfall drain in proper shape and grade and freely
draining?
(b) Is the outfall drain properly cleaned and maintained?
Does the outfall drain show any stagnant pools of water or weed
growth?
B-1.6 Surface Drainage of Downstream Slope
1.6.1 Is the condition of the downstream slope drainage
arrangements, if provided, satisfactory?
1.6.2 Is the paving to these drains intact?
1.6.3 Are all the drains properly maintained and free of
vegetation growth and debris?
1.6.4 Does the slope have a tendency to develop severe rain cuts at
any location?
1.6.5 Enumerate any other defects noticed in the surface drainage of

Page 26 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
downstream slope. inspecting officer Satisfactory)
B-1.7 Seepage Measurement
1.7.1 Is the quantity of seepage being daily or periodically measured
and recorded? Please check the registers and record
observations.
1.7.2 Does it show any abnormal rise or fall? If so, does it have any
relation to a certain reservoir level elevation?
1.7.3 Does the seepage show a turbid colour at any stage? Was such a
phenomenon observed at any stage at any location in the past?
1.7.4 What is the measured rate of seepage flow with date and
reservoir level; a) Date
i. On the day of present inspection b) Rateofseepage
ii. Maximum since last June flow (lpm)
iii. Minimum since last June c) Reservoirlevel (m)
1.7.5 Is the portion upstream and downstream of measuring points of
seepage easily accessible with proper steps and paths and free
of vegetation growth?
1.7.6 Are the measuring points properly located, constructed and
maintained so as to give accurate and reliable measurements of
seepage in accordance with the relevant IS Codes?
1.7.7 Is the method of taking seepage measurements satisfactory?
B-1.8 Breaching Section (if provided)
1.8.1 Is the breaching section easily accessible?
1.8.2 Is the condition of the breaching section satisfactory?
1.8.3 Is the note of instructions as to when and how to operate the
breaching section available on record?
1.8.4 For reconstruction after the breach are the following items

Page 27 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
decided in advance? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
a) Quarry for embankment material
b) Suitable routes of access
Is the maintenance staff fully aware of the instructions related to
operation of the beaching section and for reconstruction after
the breach
1.8.5 Ascertain and indicate the latest event of operation of breaching
section and its performance.
1.8.6 Evidence of recent degradation?
1.8.7 Any other issues?
B-1.9 Junction of Earth work with Masonry/Concrete dam sections and outlets
1.9.1 Is there any existence of leaks, springs or wet spots in the earth
work in the vicinity of the junctions between earth work and
masonry works?
If so, what is the approximate rate and colour of the leakage?
Does it turn turbid at any time? Please ascertain from enquiries
and record the findings.
1.9.2 Is there any tendency for separations, cracking, settlement or
upheaval of the earth work in the vicinity of masonry or
concrete?
If so, indicate the locations and the exact nature of deficiency.
1.9.3 Is there any tendency for surface erosion or slope instability at
the junction?
1.9.4 If the outlet conduit is located in the earth dam section, is the
entire length of the conduit in perfect order and profile and free
from offsets, open joints, cracks and leakage?
Examine the conduit carefully from the downstream or from

Page 28 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
inside, if possible, and indicate the deficiencies observed, if any. inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.9.5 Any other issues?
B-1.10 Relief Wells
1.10.1 Are the relief wells in good working condition and functioning
well?
1.10.2 Are the relief properly surged and cleaned periodically?
1.10.3 Please indicate the dates of last surging and cleaning and the
next surging due.
1.10.4 Are the necessary plant and equipment for cleaning the relief
wells, available with the office?
1.10.5 Is the record of periodical measurements of discharge from each
relief well maintained?
If so, indicate total discharge and maximum discharge observed
from a single well on the date of inspection.
B-1.11 Abutment Contacts
1.11.1 Any presence of leaks, springs or wet spots near the abutment?
1.11.2 Any presence of cracking, settlement or upheaval of earthwork?
1.11.3 Any evidence of erosion or slope instability?
1.11.4 Trees or profuse growth of weeds/bushes?
1.11.5 Any degradation to up/downstream slope protection (rip-rap,
turfing)?
1.11.6 Any other issues?
C-1 Dam and Dam Block/Reach (Concrete/Masonry)
C-1.1 General Condition
1.1.1 Any major alterations or changes to the dam since the last
inspection?
1.1.2 Is there any new nearby development in the downstream

Page 29 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
floodplain? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.1.3 Any misalignment of poles, fencing or walls due to dam
movement?
C-1.2 Upstream Face
1.2.1 Evidence of surface defects (honeycombing, staining,
stratification)?
1.2.2 Concrete/masonry deterioration (spalling, leaching,
disintegration)?
1.2.3 Is cracking present (structural, thermal, along joints)?
1.2.4 Evidence of differential settlement (displaced/offset/open
joints)?
1.2.5 Presence of vegetation (growth in joints between blocks)?
1.2.6 Evidence of any other damage to joints and/or water stops?
1.2.7 Any other issues?
C-1.3 Crest of Dam
1.3.1 Evidence of differential settlement (displaced/offset/open
joints)?
1.3.2 Presence of cracking (structural, thermal, along joints)?
1.3.3 Profuse growth of weeds/grass/plants at any location?
1.3.4 Any degradation to access road?
1.3.5 Any degradation to upstream parapet or downstream curb wall?
1.3.6 Any other issues?
C-1.4 Downstream Face
1.4.1 Evidence of surface defects (honey-combing, staining,
stratification)?
1.4.2 Concrete/masonry deterioration (spalling, leaching,
disintegration)?

Page 30 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.4.3 Presence of cracking (structural, thermal, along joints)? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.4.4 Evidence of differential settlement (displaced/offset/open
joints)?
1.4.5 Presence of vegetation (growth in joints between blocks)?
1.4.6 Evidence of any other damage to joints and/or water stops?
1.4.7 Excessive seepage/sweating at any location on downstream
face?
1.4.8 Significant leakage at any location on downstream face?
1.4.9 Any other issues?
C-1.5 Abutment Contacts
1.5.1 Any presence of leaks, springs or wet spots in vicinity of
abutment?
1.5.2 Any presence of cracking or settlement?
1.5.3 Profuse growth of weeds/grass/plants at any location?
1.5.4 Any other issues?
D Gallery/Shaft and Drainage (Concrete/Masonry)
D-1.1 General Condition
1.1.1 Slushy condition or water logging immediately downstream of
dam?
1.1.2 Any evidence of boiling in vicinity of dam toe?
D-1.2 Gallery/Shaft Condition
1.2.1 Any problems accessing or inspecting gallery/shaft
(obstruction)?
1.2.2 Any safety issues (inadequate handrails, lighting or
ventilation)?
1.2.3 Problems of inadequate drainage (slippery stairs, water logging
of gallery, clogged porous or foundation drains)?

Page 31 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.2.4 Evidence of differential settlement (displaced/offset/open inspecting officer Satisfactory)
joints)?
1.2.5 Excessive seepage/sweating at any location along gallery/shaft?
1.2.6 Significant or excessive leakage at any location along
gallery/shaft / porous drain? If yes, provide location(s).
1.2.7 Are proper arrangements made for the measurement of seepage
into the gallery? Is the seepage measured separately from-
1. Porous pipes?
2. Foundation drains? And
3. Monolith Joints?
Are the above arrangements satisfactory?
1.2.8 Has there been substantial progressive reduction in the seepage
through the foundations? Is it due to choking of the drain holes?
If so, indicate number of holes choked.
1.2.9 Are all the foundation and porous holes periodically cleaned
with reaming tool and air water jetting? Indicate the last date of
such cleaning and extent of variation observed in the seepage
discharge before and after the cleaning.
1.2.10 Is the seepage water and the deposit, if any, from the seepage
being regularly examined for chemical composition? If so,
indicate the result and the probable source of dissolved salts, if
any.
1.2.11 Are any seepage water springs observed in the downstream area
any where? If so, indicate the locations and state the physical
nature of this seepage. Look out for such seepage spots
particularly near the dykes, fault zone etc. Ascertain if chemical
testings are made of water samples from such springs for
dissolved salts.

Page 32 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.2.12 Is there any leachate deposition? If yes provide location inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.2.13 Any other issues?
D-1.3 Drain Condition
1.3.1 Is the flow in the drain unusually high or low?
1.3.2 Presence of calcium or other deposits in drain?
1.3.3 Is dewatering pumping station fully operational?
1.3.4 Any problem inspecting pump?
1.3.5 Any obstruction preventing or impairing smooth operation?
1.3.6 Any deterioration of pump and associated equipment?
1.3.7 Is sump well clean and maintained?
1.3.8 Is V-notch before sump well clean and maintained?
1.3.9 Any other evidence of the drain being blocked/having reduced
section?
1.3.10 Is the flow in the drain noticeably sporadic/irregular?
1.3.11 Does the drainage water have unusual color (leachate)?
1.3.12 Any other issues?
D-1.4 Body Wall (Masonry/Concrete) of ‘NOF’ Dam and Spillway
1.4.1 What is the total seepage into gallery from the porous pipes in
the dam at lake full condition? How does it compare with the
seepage when the reservoir was first filled? (For the
corresponding water level)
1.4.2 If there has been substantial reduction in this seepage?
Ascertain and indicate the probable reasons therefore.
1.4.3 Has there been a tendency for gradual reduction of drainage
through pipes and progressive appearance of sweating on the
downstream face of the dam?

Page 33 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.4.4 Has there been considerable leaching from the seepage water inspecting officer Satisfactory)
and deposition of lime near the seepage exit spots?
1.4.5 Are the samples of the seepage water and reservoir water being
regularly tested for reactive and corrosive properties?
1.4.6 Is there excessive seepage, sweating at any locations on the
downstream face of the dam?
(Examine the monolith or construction joints for such seepage
and leaching and indicate the findings)
1.4.7 Is there any swelling or cracking observed on the downstream
face especially near the points of concentration of stresses like
the toe or locations of abrupt change in geometry of the face of
the opening? If so, indicate the details of observations.
1.4.8 Is the pointing on upstream face of the dam in good condition?
If not, indicate the nature and extent of deficiency.
1.4.9 Are the registers and graphs showing the periodical
measurements of seepage discharge from the porous drains in
the gallery and from the downstream face at various lake levels
maintained at site?
D 1.5 Waste Weir Bar and Tail Channel
1.5.1 Is the Concrete/masonry spillway bar in good condition? Is
there any leakage through the masonry or from the foundation?
If so, what remedial measures are proposed/taken for
minimizing the leakage? Is the record of leakage measurement
maintained? What is the quantity of Seepage/Leakage on the
date of inspection?
1.5.2 Is the coping over the spillway bar in good condition?
1.5.3 Does the upstream and downstream face of waste weir bar need

Page 34 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
pointing? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.5.4 Is there any scouring on downstream side of the bar and/or
EDA? If so what remedial measures are proposed/taken?
1.5.5 Are there any damages or undermining to guide walls, divide
wall and other appurtenants? If so, what remedial measures are
proposed/taken?
D 1.6 Structural performance of the ‘NOF’ and ‘OF’ Portions of Dam Foundations
1.6.1 Are there any signs of structural distress noticed in the dam
spillway and foundations in the form of-
i. Excessive deflection with respect to permissible deflection at
the time of design
ii. Tendency of gradual sliding
iii. Cracking and upheaval or settlement in any part of the body
wall or foundations,
iv. Excessive uplift,
v. Excessive seepage and leaching through the body of the dam
and the foundation.
1.6.2 Conspicuous weathering of materials or components in any
portion of the body wall or the foundations.
E Spillway and Energy Dissipation Structure
E 1.1 Spillway
1.1.1 Any problems inspecting spillway (obstructed access, damaged
catwalk)?
1.1.2 Any obstructions in or immediately downstream of the
spillway?
1.1.3 Evidence of abrasion, cavitation or scour on glacis (e.g. exposed
reinforcement)?

Page 35 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.1.4 Presence of displaced, offset or open joints? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.1.5 Presence of cracking (structural, thermal, along joints)?
1.1.6 Evidence of surface defects (honeycombing, staining,
stratification)?
1.1.7 Concrete/masonry deterioration (spalling, leaching,
disintegration)?
1.1.8 Presence of vegetation (growth in joints between blocks)?
1.1.9 Evidence of any other damage to joints and/or waterstops?
1.1.10 Excessive seepage/sweating at any location on spillway glacis?
1.1.11 Significant leakage at any location on spillway glacis?
1.1.12 Any other issues?
E-1.2 Energy Dissipation Structure
1.2.1 Any problems inspecting energy dissipation structure?
1.2.2 Any obstructions in or immediately downstream of dissipation
structure?
1.2.3 Evidence of abrasion, cavitation or scour on dissipation
structure?
1.2.4 Presence of displaced, offset or open joints?
1.2.5 Presence of cracking (structural, thermal, along joints)?
1.2.6 Evidence of surface defects (honeycombing, staining,
stratification)?
1.2.7 Concrete/masonry deterioration (spalling, leaching,
disintegration)?
1.2.8 Presence of vegetation (growth in joints between blocks)?
1.2.9 Evidence of any other damage to joints?
1.2.10 Any problems with under-drainage (blockage of open drain
holes)?

Page 36 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.2.11 Can the tail pond be drained easily for inspection of the stilling inspecting officer Satisfactory)
basin or bucket? If not, what are the alternatives available for
dewatering? Please ascertain and indicate the last event of
inspection of stilling basin (or bucket).
1.2.12 From the examination of the levels and contour plans and
reference marks in tail channel; ascertain if there is progressive
erosion and retrogression in the tail channel. If so, indicate the
extent and location of such erosion with reference to the various
components of dam, spillway, outlet, power house etc.
1.2.13 Is the concrete surface of the stilling basin and apron (or bucket)
in good condition? Are there any indications of pitting,
cracking, spalling or wearing of the surface of bedding
concrete? If so, please give details of the nature and extent of
the damage.
1.2.13 Is there any indication of abrasion and cavitation damage
(pitting of concrete) especially at friction blocks , chute blocks
and slotted roller teeth, the surface near the lower tangent point
and the end sill? If so, please give the details of nature and
extent of damage.
1.2.14 Is the under drainage of the stilling basin (or bucket)
satisfactory? Are all the open drain holes clear and functioning
well?
1.2.15 Any other issues?
F Intake/Outlet and Water Conveyance Structure
F-1.1 Intake/Outlet Structure
1.1.1 Any problems inspecting intake/outlet structure (obstructed /
unsafe access)?

Page 37 of 59
 ResponseObservations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.1.2 Any obstructions in, upstream or downstream of intake/outlet inspecting officer Satisfactory)
structure?
1.1.3 Evidence of abrasion, cavitation or scour on intake/outlet
structure?
1.1.4 Any evidence of structural distress (displaced/offset/open joints,
cracking)?
1.1.5 Any evidence of surface defects and/or concrete/masonry
deterioration?
1.1.6 Any other issues?
F-1.2 Water Conveyance Structure
1.2.1 Any problems inspecting intake/outlet structure (obstructed/
unsafe access)?
1.2.2 Any obstructions in, upstream or downstream of water
conveyance structure?
1.2.3 Evidence of abrasion, cavitation or scour on structure?
1.2.4 Any evidence of structural distress (displaced/offset/open joints,
cracking)?
1.2.5 Any evidence of surface defects and/or material deterioration?
1.2.6 Any evidence of seepage or leakage from water conveyance
structure?
1.2.7 Any other issues?
G-1 Hydro-Mechanical Component and Pump
G-1.1 Spillway Gates (Radial gates, Vertical lift gates, Automatic gates)
1.1.1 Any problems inspecting gate/Stop-logs (obstructed/unsafe
access)?
1.1.2 Is the condition of the steel surface and the surface paint
deteriorated?

Page 38 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.1.3 Are any connection bolts of rubber seals loosened or damaged? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
If so, indicate the details of defects.
1.1.4 What is the general condition of rubber seals? Do any of the
rubber seals show signs of weathering, hardening, cracking or
tearing and damage?
1.1.5 Are the rubber seals of side and bottom touching uniformly all
along the sealing surface?
1.1.6 Do the rollers (wherever applicable) touch the track plates
uniformly? Are the rollers well lubricated?
1.1.7 Are the embeded parts of spillway gates, emergency gates and
stop-logs in sound condition and free from corrosion, uneven
wear, cracking, chipping and dents? If not, state the nature of
defects or deficiencies and observation, if any, regarding such
defects.
1.1.8 Check the following for structural soundness of all members
and welded, bolted and riveted connections, uneven wear,
uneven bearing, cracking, chipping and dents and indicate the
findings:
(1) Gate leaf and stiffeners
(2) End arms
(3) Trunnion girders / Yoke girder
(4) Stop logs
(5) Lifting beams
(6) Gantry cranes
(7) Tracks
(8) Trunnion bracket
(9) Chains/ wire ropes
(10) Bridge structure

Page 39 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.1.9 Are the trunnion bearings of radial gates properly lubricated? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.1.10 Is there any damage or wear caused to the seal plates? If so,
indicate the nature of damage noticed.
1.1.11 Are any of the mechanical or structural components and fastners
or seals subjected to excessive wear? If so, please give details.
Is there any tendency for recurring damage to any particular
component? If so, please give details.
1.1.12 Is sufficient stock of spares which need frequent replacement
maintained at the site?
1.1.13 Any issues with storage of equipment (emergency stop logs,
lifting beam and gate leaves)?
1.1.14 Any deterioration, corrosion? scaling? pitting? or cracking? of
equipment (connecting bolts, welds?)
1.1.15 Any obstructions preventing or impairing smooth operation?
1.1.16 Any problems with the rollers (not touching tracks, inadequate
lubrification)?
1.1.17 Any debris, etc., in the gate grooves?
1.1.18 Any damages to Radial Gate trunion pins? gate arms?
lubrication? etc.?
1.1.19 Any damage to embedded parts above waterline? access
structure?
1.1.20 Any damage to concrete grooves?
1.1.21 Is the staff posted at the site for maintenance and operation of
gates, hoists, equipments and electrical installations, well
experienced, fully trained and conversant with the job
requirements and responsibilities?
1.1.22 Are the following documents maintained at the respective

Page 40 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
location of all the units? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
(1) Maintenance schedules specifying each operation, its
frequency and ‘due’ and’ done’ dates.
(2) Operating instructions with ‘dos’ and ‘don’t’ for all
operational units.
1.1.23 Are the trunnion hub and the brackets well maintained?
1.1.24 Are the trunnions likely to get submerged during actual working
of the spillway? if so, ascertain the causes for the same and
specify. Please enquire for occurrence of such events, if any.
1.1.25 Are all the nuts of connecting bolts and anchorages properly
tightened?
1..1.26 Any other issues?
G-1.2 Hoists, Cranes and Operating Mechanisms
1.2.1 Are the hoists working satisfactorily?
1.2.2 Any problems inspecting hoist/crane/operating mechanism?
1.2.3 Is sufficient stock of spares which need frequent replacement
maintained at the site?
1.2.4 Is the full length of the chains or wire rope of the hoist in sound
condition and free from broken strands?
1.2.5 Is the electrical wiring in sound condition?
1.2.6 Is the alternative power system for gate operation working
properly?
1.2.7 Is the alternate hand operation system of hoist working
1.2.8 Any deterioration of equipment (connecting bolts, welds,
surface, paint work?)
1.2.9 Any wear or damage to wire cables and other moving parts?
1.2.10 Any obstructions preventing or impairing smooth operation?

Page 41 of 59
 ResponseObservations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.2.11 Any health and safety concerns (e.g. lack of "danger" sign inspecting officer Satisfactory)
during maintenance)?
1.2.12 Any other issues?
G 1.3. Spillway Bridge, Hoist Bridge, Trunnion Level Bridge Catwalks
1.3.1 Are the decking, girders and structural supports of spillway
bridge, hoist bridge, trunnion level bridge and catwalks
structurally sound?
1.3.2 Is the chequered platform of the bridge structurally sound and
safe?
1.3.3 Is there satisfactory arrangement to prevent unauthorized entry
into the control structures and bridges?
1.3.4 Are the structural members and joints sound and free from
corrosion?
1.3.5 When were the steel components painted last?
1.3.6 Is the surface of steel work and paints satisfactory?
1.3.7 Is the parapet or railing over the bridges sound, safe and
painted?
1.3.8 Is the walkway properly enchored to the piers?
1.3.9 Are the track rails for gantry cranes structurally sound and
intact?
G-1.4 Valves
1.4.1 Any problems inspecting valve?
1.4.2 Any obstructions preventing or impairing smooth operation?
1.4.3 Any deterioration of valve and associated equipment?
1.4.4 Any other issues?
G-1.5 Walls: Guide walls/Divide walls/Junction walls/Return walls/Spray walls etc. (Strike out
whichever is not applicable)

Page 42 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.5.1 Are all the locations of such wall accessible for inspection, inspecting officer Satisfactory)
maintenance and repairs?
1.5.2 Is the drainage of back sides of the walls (wherever applicable)
from the weep holes satisfactory? If not, indicate the nature of
deficiencies.
1.5.3 Is there any tendency for the water to undercut the ends of the
walls?
1.5.4 Is there any foundation erosion or scour noticed in the vicinity
of such walls? If so, give the details of nature and extent of such
damage.
1.5.5 Is there any surface erosion/damage caused, to face or body of
such walls?
1.5.6 Do any of the walls show symptoms of unusual settlement,
developments of cracks and tilting? If so, give details of the
defects noticed.
1.5.7 Is there any damage to guide bunds? If so, give details of the
damage.
G-1.6 EndWeir
1.6.1 Is it accessible?
1.6.2 Is there any erosion, pitting or spalling of the concrete or
masonry surface?
If so, give details
1.6.3 Is there any scour noticed on the immediate downstream of
such weir? If so, give details of location and extent of such
damage.
G-1.7 HydraulicPerformanceofEnergy DissipationArrangements
1.7.1 Do the flow conditions in the stilling basin (or bucket) have a

Page 43 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
tendency to draw material into the bucket and cause its inspecting officer Satisfactory)
churning and abrasion damage to the surface of buckets baffle
blocks, apron and end sill?
Is the hydraulic performance in agreement with the results of
model studies? (wherever applicable)
Ascertain the performance from observed tail water rating
curves and deficient observation, if any, such as sweep outs
and excessive erosion under plunge pools and locations of
secondary rollers and retrogression.
G-1.8 Trash Racks
1.8.1 Is the trash rack fixed or movable?
1.8.2 What is the mode of cleaning? Is it manual or by TRCM?
1.8.3 Is the welding work on Trash Rack in sound health?
1.8.4 Any problems inspecting trash rack?
1.8.5 Problems of excessive debris and/or inadequate cleaning?
1.8.6 Any deterioration of trash rack (rust, corrosion, and damaged
blades)?
1.8.7 Any other issues?
G-1.9 Trash Rack Cleaning Machines
1.9.1 Any problems inspecting trash rack cleaning machine?
1.9.2 Missing or inadequate spare parts (particularly requiring regular
replacement)?
1.9.3 Any deterioration of equipment (wheel trolleys, gantry
structures, operating mechanism, connecting bolts, welds,
surface, paint work?)
1.9.4 Any wear or damage to wire cables and other moving parts?
1.9.5 Any obstructions preventing or impairing smooth operation?

Page 44 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.9.6 Missing or inadequate provision of back-up/standby power inspecting officer Satisfactory)
supply?
1.9.7 Any health and safety concerns (e.g. lack of "danger" sign
during maintenance)?
1.9.8 Any other issues?
G-1.10 Pumps
1.10.1 Any problems inspecting pump?
1.10.2 Any obstructions preventing or impairing smooth operation?
1.10.3 Any deterioration of pump and associated equipment?
1.10.4 Any other issues?
G-1.11 Approachb r i d g e ,operationplatformandcabin(foroutlets):
1.11.1 Are the decking, girders and structural supports of approach
bridge structurally sound?
1.11.2 Is the floor of the operating platform structurally sound and
safe?
1.11.3 Is there satisfactory arrangement to prevent unauthorized entry
into the control structures of the outlet?
1.11.4 Are the structural members and joints sound and free from
corrosion?
1.11.5 When were the steel components painted last?
1.11.6 Is the surface of steel work and paint satisfactory?
1.11.7 Is the parapet or railing over the control tower, operating
platform and approach bridge sound and safe?
G-1.12 Outlet
1.12.1 Is the air vent periodically cleaned?
1.12.2 Are there any structural damages to the intake well?
1.12.3 Is there any leakage observed through the well proper and the

Page 45 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
conduit concrete or masonry? If so, give details of its location inspecting officer Satisfactory)
and extent.
1.12.4 Is there any damage noticed to the conduit concrete, breast wall
and gates lots?
1.12.5 Isthebye-pass valve/filling-in-valve (wherever provided)
operating satisfactory?
(a) Take operation trials of the following as provided
andrecord the observations and defects noticed, if any.
(1) Service gate(s).
(2) Emergency gate(s).
(3) Stop-log gate(s).
(4) Sluice valves.

Note-
(i) The operating trial for the emergency gate shall be taken
with service gate in partially open position to test the
capability of emergency gate for self-closing under these
conditions. The trial for the operation of the emergency
gate under balanced condition of water pressure also needs to
be taken
(ii) To guard against the possibility of outlet gate hoist being
operated forcibly after closed position of gate a “Distinctive
Mark” should be insisted or check the functioning of the
limit switches.
1.12.6 Are there vibrations and noise noticed in operation of out-let
gates at any time?
If so, are any periodical observations taken to ascertain their
severity?

Page 46 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.12.7 Is the energy dissipation arrangement working satisfactorily for all inspecting officer Satisfactory)
the discharges?
Is there any structural damage to the energy dissipation structure?
If so, give details of nature and extent of damage.
1.12.8 Is the conduit structurally sound and reasonably leak proof? If not,
give details of nature and extent of the defects.
1.12.9 Is there any seepage noticed around the conduit as ascertained
from the observations of the downstream conditions? If so, is it
likely to cause (In case of earth dams) erosion and piping?
G-1.13 OutletGates
1.13.1 Is the surface of gates and the paint deteriorated?
1.13.2 Are the connecting bolts of rubber seals properly tightened or
damaged?
1.13.3 Do the rubber seals show signs of weathering and damage and
need replacements?
1.13.4 Are the rubber seals of side sand bottom touching the bearing
surface uniformly?
1.13.5 Do all the rollers touch the track plates?
1.13.6 Are the rollers well lubricated?
1.13.7 Are the stem rods for lifting the gates perfectly straight?
1.13.8 Is the operation of outlet gates smooth?
Are the actual operations of lifting and lowering of the gates
and hoist mechanisms adequate and smooth?
1.13.9 Are all the gears and hoist mechanisms well lubricated?
1.13.10 Is the storing arrangement for emergency gate leaves and the
stop logs in satisfactory condition?
1.13.11 Are the seal plates/seats in sound condition?

Page 47 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
1.13.12 Is the full length of wire rope (wherever applicable) of the hoist inspecting officer Satisfactory)
in serviceable condition and free from any broken strands?
1.13.13 Are all the nuts of connecting bolt and anchors properly
tightened?
1.13.14 Are all the lifting beams in proper working order and in levelled
condition. If not ascertain the nature and extent of problems.
Do any of the mechanical or structural parts of the gate,
fasteners of hoist show signs of excessive wear? If so, please
give details.
1.13.15 Is there any tendency for recurring damage to any particular
component or components? If so, please give details.
1.13.16 Is sufficient stock of spares, which need frequent replacement,
maintained at the site?
G-1.14 River Outlet/River S luice
1.14.1 Is the overall condition of river outlet works/river sluices
satisfactory?
Is the operation of the gate (Service/Emergency/Stop-log)
satisfactory as ascertained by taking operating trial? If not,
indicate the defects noticed.
1.14.2 Are the trash racks (wherever provided) cleaned
before monsoon?
1.14.3 Is there excessive silting on the upstream of the sluice?
1.14.4 When were the gates last opened for desilting, etc.?
1.14.5 Please indicate the approximate quantity of the leakage through
the gates, if any.
1.14.6 Is there any seepage or leakage through the conduit surface?
1.14.7 Is there any damage to the upstream and downstream

Page 48 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
convergence of the conduit? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.14.8 Is the condition of energy dissipation arrangement satisfactory?
If not, indicate nature and extent of damage. Is there any
retrogression noticed in the downstream channel? If so, give
details of nature and extent of damage.
H-1 Access Road
H-1.1 General Condition
1.1.1 Any problems ensuring security of dam site (including gates
and fencing)?
1.1.2 Is there a properly constructed and well maintained all weather
access road to the dam site?
1.1.3 What is the type of the pavement of the access road and its
condition?
1.1.4 Are there properly constructed and well maintained access road
arrangements to the following components for inspection,
maintenance and repairs? Top of Dam Spillway Gates and
hoisting arrangement Drainage gallery, adits and exits Bridge
structure Downstream stilling basin Junction and abutments
Outlet control tower Outlet gates Toe of earth dam, downstream
drainage arrangements and berms. All saddle dams.
1.1.5 What is the general condition of all the masonry structures on
various access roads?
1.1.6 Are all the structures on the access roads adequately safe for
allowing passage of plant machinery for emergent repairs?
1.1.7 Any obstructions along or at entrance to access road (temporary
or long-term)?
1.1.8 Any slope stability issues (road embankment or adjacent

Page 49 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
slopes)? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.1.9 Profuse growth of weeds/grass on or in vicinity of access road?
1.1.10 Any drainage problems (standing water on or adjacent to road)?
1.1.11 Any other degradation to road surface (ruts, potholes, cavities,
cracking)?
1.1.12 Any other issues?
I-1 Instrumentation
I-1.1 General Condition
1.1.1 Are all the instruments installed accessible? (Attach separate As per Annexure-III
list).
Are all the locations properly lighted, ventilated and adequately
protected from possibilities of damage?
1.1.2 Any problems inspecting instrument (obstructed/unsafe access)?
1.1.3 Is the instrument vulnerable to damage or theft (inadequate
protection)?
1.1.4 Any problems ensuring correct functioning of instrument
(lighting, ventilation)?
1.1.5 Any evidence of degradation to condition of instrument
(rusting, vandalism)?
1.1.6 Are all the instruments in working order? Ascertain the cases of
instruments going out of order and indicate.
1.1.7 Are all the registers of observations posted up-to-date? Please
take test observations and initial the register.
1.1.8 Are all the plotting of the instrumentation data completed up-to-
date?
Are sufficient stocks of spares, gauges, master gauges,
stationary items etc., maintained at the site for uninterrupted

Page 50 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
data collection? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
1.1.9 Operator or public safety issues?
1.1.10 Any other issues?
I-1.2 CommunicationFacilities
1.2.1 Are following facilities available at dam site?
(1) Wireless Telephone / mobile/Fax/Internet
1.2.2 Any other issue (please indicate part, location, etc., as
necessary)
K-1 Emergency Preparedness
K-1.1. Emergency Action Plan
1.1.1 Is the Emergency Action Plan (EAP) prepared for the dam as
per the national guidelines? If not, the expected date of
preparation of guidelines
1.1.2 When EAP was last updated?
1.1.3 If not, are any dam staff unaware or insufficiently conversant
with the EAP?
1.1.4 Any concerned authorities unaware or insufficiently conversant
with the EAP?
1.1.5 Are communication directories/contact details and other
dynamic information are being updated annually?
1.1.6 Any problems accessing or operating the communication/
warning system?
1.1.7 Are inundation maps updated and available to concerned
authorities?
1.1.8 Are the concerned authorities informed about the system of
emergency reporting procedures and warning?
1.1.9 Are available safety spots on the downstream of the dam

Page 51 of 59
 Response Observations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
identified and made known to the concerned authorities? inspecting officer Satisfactory)
Are adequate warning devices and facilities provided at the
dam?
1.1.8 Are proper arrangements made for security of the dam and
preventing cases of unauthorized trespass, vandalism and
sabotage to the dam works?
1.1.9 Date of last annual stakeholder consultation meeting along with
mock drill exercise conducted
1.1.10 Does the EAP disseminated to all the concerned stakeholders?
1.1.11 Any other issues?
K-1.2 Inspection of Records
1.2.1 Whetherfollowing Dam Safety Documents areprepared and
approved by the competent authority?
I. As Built Drawings
II. EAP
III. Completion Report
IV. DataBook
V. OandMmanual
1.2.2 Are the relevant documents reviewed and updated from time to
time?
1.2.3 Are all the members of the maintenance staff adequately trained
and fully conversant with their responsibilities concerning.
(a) Designer’s Operation Criteria.
(b) Standing Operating Procedures.
(c) Maintenance and Vigilance Procedures of the dam.
(d) Maintenance and operation of all control equipments.
(e) Reservoir Operation Schedules, Gate Operation Schedule

Page 52 of 59
 ResponseObservations and Conditionb
Sl. a
Inspection Item recommendations, if (Unsatisfactor
No.
Y N NA any, of the authorized y /Poor/Fair/
(f) Maintenance and Operation of all instruments. inspecting officer Satisfactory)
(g) Identification of signs of deficient behavior.
(h) Reporting Procedures of emergency situations.
(i) Emergency repairs

L-1.1 Inspection Photographs

1.1.1 Information to be furnished as per Annexure - II
a
Respond either yes (Y), no (N) or not applicable (NA).
b
Condition: Please rate the condition as either Satisfactory, Fair, Poor or Unsatisfactory as described below:
1. Satisfactory - No existing or potential dam safety deficiencies are recognized. Acceptable performance is
expected under all loading conditions (static, hydrologic, seismic) in accordance with the applicable
regulatory criteria or tolerable risk guidelines.
2. Fair - No existing dam safety deficiencies are recognized for normal loading conditions. Rare or extreme
hydrologic and/or seismic events may result in a dam safety deficiency. Risk may be in the range to take
further action.
3. Poor - A dam safety deficiency is recognized for loading conditions which may realistically occur.
Remedial action is necessary. Poor may also be used when uncertainties exist as to critical analysis
parameters which identify a potential dam safety deficiency. Further investigations and studies are
necessary.
4. Unsatisfactory - A dam safety deficiency is recognized that requires immediate or emergency remedial
action for problem resolution.

Part 2b – Consolidated Dam Health Status Report:

Page 53 of 59
 Observations/Significant
SN Remedial Measures Suggested
Deficiencies Noticed
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

..

..

10.

Overall condition of dam based on above inspection – Unsatisfactory/Poor/Fair/Satisfactory (tick

appropriate)
Overall Safety Category* of the Dam -
*
Category I– deficiencies which may lead to failure;
Category II – major deficiencies requiring prompt remedial measures;
Category III – minor remedial measures which are rectifiable during the year

Name of Official(s) and Signature(s) :

Date:

Page 54 of 59
 ANNEXURE-III

CHECKLIST OF VARIOUS INSTRUMENTS INSTALLED ON LARGE DAMS

Name of Dam: Location:

Date last
Agency Analysis
Since Whether calibratio Data sent
n Observation responsibl of data
when in to DSO
Sl. Locatio s e for data done at
Name of Instruments Nos. installed working Date for maintained collection regularly Remarks
No. n field
(Month/ condition next ?
(Yes/No) and level
Year) (Yes/No) calibratio (Yes/No)
processing (Yes/No)
n
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS
1. Raingauge on Dam
Raingauge in the
2.
Catchment
3. Pan Evaporimeter
Wind Velocity
4.
Recorder
Wind Direction
5.
Recorder
6. Wave Height Recorder
Wet and dry bulb
7.
Thermometer
8. Barometer
Thermometers for air
9.
Temp.

Page 55 of 59
 Date last
Agency Analysis
Since Whether calibratio Data sent
n Observation responsibl of data
when in to DSO
Sl. Locatio s e for data done at
Name of Instruments Nos. installed working Date for maintained collection regularly Remarks
No. n field
(Month/ condition next ?
(Yes/No) and level
Year) (Yes/No) calibratio (Yes/No)
processing (Yes/No)
n
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
Thermometers for
10. Reservoir Water
Temp.
Automatic Weather
11.
Station
Reservoir level gate
12. (i) Staff gate
(ii) Automatic
Other Hydro-
meteorological
Instruments, if any
13.
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
GEO-TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS
Piezometers
(i) Stand pipe
1. (ii) Casagrande
(iii) Twin Tube
(iv) Vibrating wire

Page 56 of 59
 Date last
Agency Analysis
Since Whether calibratio Data sent
n Observation responsibl of data
when in to DSO
Sl. Locatio s e for data done at
Name of Instruments Nos. installed working Date for maintained collection regularly Remarks
No. n field
(Month/ condition next ?
(Yes/No) and level
Year) (Yes/No) calibratio (Yes/No)
processing (Yes/No)
n
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
Uplift pressure cell
(i) For permeable
2. foundation
(ii) For Rock
foundation
Strain Gauge
(i) Mechanical Strain
3. Gauge
(ii) Electrical Strain
Gauge
Strain Meter
4.
(i) Vibrating wire
Thermometers
5. (i) Resistance
(ii) Vibrating Wire
Stress Meter
6. (i) Mechanical
(ii) Electrical
7. Seepage Measurement
(i) V-Notch

Page 57 of 59
 Date last
Agency Analysis
Since Whether calibratio Data sent
n Observation responsibl of data
when in to DSO
Sl. Locatio s e for data done at
Name of Instruments Nos. installed working Date for maintained collection regularly Remarks
No. n field
(Month/ condition next ?
(Yes/No) and level
Year) (Yes/No) calibratio (Yes/No)
processing (Yes/No)
n
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
(ii) Other devices
Automation
(i) Data logger
8. (ii) Data Acquisition
system
(iii) Computers
9. (i) Plumb Bob –
Direct
(ii) Plumb Bob –
Inverted
(iii) Detachable
Gauges for
Surface
Displacement
(iv) Joint meter for
internal joint
movement
(v) Tilt Meter
(vi) Foundation
Settlement
Deformation
Meter

Page 58 of 59
 Date last
Agency Analysis
Since Whether calibratio Data sent
n Observation responsibl of data
when in to DSO
Sl. Locatio s e for data done at
Name of Instruments Nos. installed working Date for maintained collection regularly Remarks
No. n field
(Month/ condition next ?
(Yes/No) and level
Year) (Yes/No) calibratio (Yes/No)
processing (Yes/No)
n
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
(vii)Inclinometer
Other Geotechnical
Instruments, if any
10. (i)
(ii)
(iii)
GEODETIC INSTRUMENTS
1. Total Station
2. Survey Markers
3. Settlement Plates
SEISMIC INSTRUMENTS
1. Seismograph
2. Accelerograph

Page 59 of 59