Army Tactics Field Manual FM 3-90
Army Tactics Field Manual FM 3-90
Tactics
JULY 2001
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:
Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited
HEADQUARTERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
*FM 3-90
TACTICS
Contents
Page
FIGURES.................................................................................................................... vi
TABLES .................................................................................................................... xii
PREFACE..................................................................................................................xiii
PART ONE TACTICAL FUNDAMENTALS
Chapter 1 THE ART OF TACTICS ...........................................................................................1-1
The Tactical Level of War.........................................................................................1-2
The Science and Art of Tactics ................................................................................1-3
Historical Example....................................................................................................1-6
Hasty Versus Deliberate Operations ........................................................................1-9
Solving Tactical Problems ......................................................................................1-13
ii
Contents
iii
FM 3-90
iv
Contents
v
Figures
Figure Page
1-1. Initial Situation ............................................................................................. 1-7
1-2. British Moves............................................................................................... 1-8
1-3. Final Battle Stage ........................................................................................ 1-8
1-4. Risk Reduction Factors ............................................................................. 1-13
2-1. Doctrinal Hierarchy of Operations ............................................................... 2-2
2-2. Flanks of a Stationary Unit .......................................................................... 2-7
2-3. Flanks of an Armor-Heavy Team Moving in an Echelon Right Formation .. 2-7
2-4. Generic Air Corridor .................................................................................. 2-12
2-5 Corps with Contiguous Areas of Operations ............................................. 2-16
2-6. Corps with Noncontiguous Areas of Operations ....................................... 2-17
2-7. Assembly Areas ........................................................................................ 2-19
2-8. Checkpoint 13 ........................................................................................... 2-19
2-9. Contact Point 8.......................................................................................... 2-20
2-10. Engagement Areas ................................................................................... 2-21
2-11. Sectors of Fire........................................................................................... 2-22
2-12. Target Reference Point ............................................................................. 2-23
2-13. Trigger Lines ............................................................................................. 2-23
2-14. Deep, Close, and Rear Areas ................................................................... 2-25
2-15. Coordinated Fire Line................................................................................ 2-27
2-16. Fire Support Coordination Line ................................................................. 2-27
2-17. Free-Fire Area........................................................................................... 2-28
2-18. A Formal Airspace Coordination Measure ................................................ 2-29
2-19. No-Fire Area.............................................................................................. 2-30
2-20. Restrictive Fire Area.................................................................................. 2-30
2-21. Restrictive Fire Line .................................................................................. 2-31
2-22. Targets ...................................................................................................... 2-31
2-23. Forward Line of Own Troops..................................................................... 2-32
2-24. Line of Contact .......................................................................................... 2-32
2-25. Named Area of Interest ............................................................................. 2-33
2-26. Obstacle Control Measure Graphics ......................................................... 2-34
2-27. Phase Lines Used with Other Control Measures ...................................... 2-37
2-28. Position Area for Artillery........................................................................... 2-38
2-29. Routes ....................................................................................................... 2-38
vi
Figures
vii
FM 3-90
viii
Figures
ix
FM 3-90
x
Figures
xi
FM 3-90
Tables
Table Page
5-1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Limited-Visibility Attacks...................... 5-8
11-1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Delay Techniques............................ 11-10
12-1. Typical Size of Security Forces for a Given Mission and Echelon ............ 12-6
12-2. Screen Movement Methods .................................................................... 12-17
13-1. Typical ISR Assets Available..................................................................... 13-6
13-2. Dedicated Reconnaissance Units and Forms of Reconnaissance
Operations................................................................................................. 13-8
xii
Preface
Doctrine provides a military organization with a common philosophy, a language,
a purpose, and unity of effort. Tactics is the art and science of employing all
available means to win battles and engagements. Specifically, it comprises the
actions taken by a commander to arrange units and activities in relation to each
other and the enemy.
PURPOSE
FM 3-90 introduces the basic concepts and control measures associated with the
art of tactics. It cannot be read in isolation. To understand FM 3-90, the reader
must understand the operational art, principles of war, and links between the
operational and tactical levels of war described in FM 3-0, Operations. He should
understand how the activities described in FM 3-07, Stability Operations and
Support Operations, carry over and affect offensive and defensive operations and
vice versa. He should understand the operations (plan, prepare, execute, and
assess) process described in FM 6-0, Command and Control, and how that
process relates to the military decision making process and troop-leading
procedures described in FM 5-0, Army Planning and Orders Production. FM 3-90
also refers to joint publications (JPs). Reviewing referenced JPs will also aid in
understanding FM 3-90.
FM 3-90 focuses on the tactics used to employ available means to win in combat.
Those tactics require judgment in application. The ability to seize and secure
terrain, with its populations and productive capacity, distinguishes land forces
conducting decisive offensive and defensive operations. FM 3-90 provides a com-
mon discussion of how commanders from the battalion task force level through
the corps echelon conduct tactical offensive and defensive operations and their
supporting tactical enabling operations. It is not prescriptive, but authoritative.
Tactical fundamentals do not change with the fielding of each new piece of
equipment. However, the integration of new equipment and organizations
usually requires changes in related techniques and procedures. FM 3-90 provides
guidance in the form of combat-tested concepts and ideas modified to exploit
emerging Army and joint capabilities.
SCOPE
FM 3-90 focuses on the organization of forces, minimum essential control
measures, and general planning, preparation, and execution considerations for
each type and form of combat operation. It is the common reference for all
students of the tactical art, both in the field and the Army school system. A fam-
ily of subordinate manuals address the techniques and procedures used by
tactical combat forces at each echelon. Assessment concepts described in FM 6-0
and FM 6-22, Army Leadership, also apply. All operations process considerations
are modified as necessary to account for the specific factors of METT-TC existing
during each operation.
xiii
Tactical enabling operations and special environments discussed in other man-
uals are not repeated in FM 3-90. That is why FM 3-90 does not discuss why
information operations (FM 3-13), river-crossing operations (FM 3-97.13), and
combined arms breaching operations (FM 3-34.2).
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Readers of FM 3-90 should be aware that the rules regarding the use of land
mines are evolving. A commander should seek legal guidance concerning
currently applicable rules and policies regarding land mines before directing
their employment. The rules of engagement he provides to his subordinates
should reflect those guidelines.
The historical examples used in FM 3-90 were deliberately chosen to illustrate
the fact that American tacticians should widen their areas of study of the
military profession to include other armies and other times.
In FM 3-90, the term heavy applies to armored, aviation, cavalry, mechanized
infantry and their associated combined arms elements. The term light applies to
airborne, air assault, and light infantry and their associated combined arms
elements. The term special operations forces applies to rangers, special forces,
special operations aviation, civil affairs, and psychological operations elements.
The initial brigade combat teams (IBCTs) are the prototypes of a medium force
and are included in the discussion of heavy and light forces as appropriate.
In FM 3-90, the term battalion applies to a battalion, battalion task force, or a
cavalry squadron unless differences in capabilities requires that a specific
organization be named. The term company refers to a company, company team,
battery, or troop size organization.
FM 3-90 uses planning process to indicate both the military decision making
process and troop leading procedures. Battalion-sized and larger units use the
military decision making process. Company-sized and smaller units follow troop
leading procedures.
Unless otherwise stated, whenever FM 3-90 uses the singular form of decisive
operation or shaping operation; both the singular and plural forms are included.
The glossary lists most terms used in FM 3-90 that have joint or Army
definitions. Terms for which FM 3-90 is the proponent manual (the authority) are
indicated with an asterisk. Definitions for which FM 3-90 is the proponent
manual are printed in boldface in the text. For other definitions the term is
italicized and the number of the proponent manual follows the definition.
Cross-references use the new field manual numbering system. The bibliography
lists field manuals by new number followed by old number.
Unless stated otherwise, masculine nouns or pronouns do not refer exclusively to
men.
Headquarters, US Army Training and Doctrine Command is the proponent for
this publication. Send comments and recommended changes and the rational for
those changes to: Commander, US Army Combined Arms Center and Fort
Leavenworth, ATTN: ATZL-SWW, 1 Reynolds Road, Fort Leavenworth, KS
66027-1352.
xiv
PART ONE
Tactical Fundamentals
Chapter 1
1-1
FM 3-90
1-2
The Art of Tactics
THE SCIENCE
1-10. The science of tactics encompasses the understanding of those
military aspects of tactics—capabilities, techniques, and proced-
ures—that can be measured and codified. The science of tactics includes
the physical capabilities of friendly and enemy organizations and systems,
such as determining how long it takes a division to move a certain distance. It
also includes techniques and procedures used to accomplish specific tasks,
such as the tactical terms and control graphics that comprise the language of
tactics. While not easy, the science of tactics is fairly straightforward. Much of
what is contained in this manual is the science of tactics—techniques and
procedures for employing the various elements of the combined arms team to
achieve greater effects.
1-11. Mastery of the science of tactics is necessary for the tactician to under-
stand the physical and procedural constraints under which he must work.
These constraints include the effects of terrain, time, space, and weather on
friendly and enemy forces. However—because combat is an intensely human
activity—the solution to tactical problems cannot be reduced to a formula.
This realization necessitates the study of the art of tactics.
1-3
FM 3-90
THE ART
1-12. The art of tactics consists of three interrelated aspects: the
creative and flexible array of means to accomplish assigned mis-
sions, decision making under conditions of uncertainty when faced
with an intelligent enemy, and understanding the human dimen-
sion—the effects of combat on soldiers. An art, as opposed to a science,
requires exercising intuitive faculties that cannot be learned solely by study.
The tactician must temper his study and evolve his skill through a variety of
relevant, practical experiences. The more experience the tactician gains from
practice under a variety of circumstances, the greater his mastery of the art
of tactics.
1-13. The tactician invokes the art of tactics to solve tactical problems within
his commander’s intent by choosing from interrelated options, including—
· Types and forms of operations, forms of maneuver, and tactical mission
tasks.
· Task organization of available forces, to include allocating scarce re-
sources.
· Arrangement and choice of control measures.
· Tempo of the operation.
· Risks the commander is willing to take.
1-14. These options represent a starting point for the tactician to create a
unique solution to a specific tactical problem. Each decision represents a
choice among a range of options; each balances competing demands requiring
judgment at every turn. While there may be checklists for techniques and
procedures, there are no checklists for solving tactical problems. The com-
mander must not look for a checklist approach to tactics; instead, he must use
his experience and creativity to outthink his enemy.
1-15. There are three aspects to the art of tactics that define a competent tac-
tician. The first is the creative and flexible application of the tools available to
the commander, such as doctrine, tactics, techniques, procedures, training,
organizations, materiel, and soldiers in an attempt to render the enemy’s sit-
uational tactics ineffective. The tactician must understand how to train and
employ his forces in full spectrum operations. The factors of mission, enemy,
terrain and weather, troops, time available, and civil considerations
(METT-TC) are variables whose infinite mutations always combine to form a
new tactical pattern. (FM 6-0 discusses the factors of METT-TC in detail.)
They never produce exactly the same situation; thus there can be no check-
lists that adequately address each unique situation. Because the enemy
changes and adapts to friendly moves during the planning, preparation, and
execution of an operation, there is no guarantee that a technique which
worked in one situation will work again. Each tactical problem is unique and
must be solved on its own merits.
1-16. The second aspect of the art of tactics is decision making under condi-
tions of uncertainty in a time-constrained environment and demonstrated by
the clash of opposing wills—a violent struggle between two hostile, thinking,
and independent opposing commanders with irreconcilable goals. Each com-
mander wants to impose his will on his opponent, defeat his opponent’s plans,
1-4
The Art of Tactics
and destroy his opponent’s forces. Combat consists of the interplay between
these two opposing commanders, with each commander seeking to accomplish
his mission while preventing the other from doing the same. Every command-
er needs a high degree of creativity and clarity of thought to outwit a willing
and able opponent. He must quickly apply his judgment to a less than omni-
scient common operational picture provided by his command and control (C2)
system to understand the implications and opportunities afforded him by the
situation. The commander always uses the most current intelligence in order
to facilitate his visualization of the enemy and environment. That same C2
system transmits the decisions resulting from his situational understanding
to those individuals and units required to engage and destroy the enemy
force.
1-17. The third and final aspect of the art of tactics is understanding the
human dimension—what differentiates actual combat from the problems en-
countered during training and in a classroom. Combat is one of the most com-
plex human activities, characterized by violent death, friction, uncertainty,
and chance. Success depends at least as much on this human aspect as it does
on any numerical and technological superiority.
1-5
FM 3-90
1-18. The tactician cannot ignore the human aspect. He seeks to recognize
and exploit indicators of fear and weakness in his enemy, and to defeat the
enemy’s will, since soldiers remain key to generating combat power. More
than any other human activity, continuous combat operations against an in-
telligent enemy takes a toll on soldiers, severely straining their physical and
mental stamina. This creates in soldiers the tangible and intangible effects of
courage, fear, combat experience, exhaustion, isolation, confidence, thirst,
and anger. If left unchecked these effects can result in decreased vigilance,
slowed perception, inability to concentrate, communication difficulties, and
an inability to accomplish manual tasks.
1-19. Leaders must be alert to indicators of fatigue, fear, lapses in discipline
standards, and reduced morale in friendly and enemy soldiers. They must
work to counteract the effects on the friendly force while taking measures to
enhance these effects on the enemy. When the friendly force has the initia-
tive, it can force the enemy to conduct continuous operations to react to
friendly actions and then exploit the effects of continuous operations on the
enemy. These conditions can have a cumulative effect on units that can lead
to collapse. The tactician must understand how they affect human endurance
and factor them into his plans. He must understand the limits of human en-
durance in combat. This is the subtle difference between pushing soldiers be-
yond their limits to exploit success versus resting them to prevent the col-
lapse of unit cohesion. (FM 6-22.5 discusses the effects of continuous combat
operations.)
HISTORICAL EXAMPLE
1-20. The following vignette discusses the Battle of Cowpens fought during
the American Revolution. It illustrates the need for the tactician to combine
the effects of the science of tactics with his application of the tactical art.
1-6
The Art of Tactics
infantry, and no artillery. However, his militia force’s rifles had a longer range than
the British muskets, and the terrain allowed him to mask his reserves from view.
Morgan deployed his forces on the battlefield, confident that Tarleton would not
attempt to flank his position. Rather, Morgan believed that Tarleton would initially
attack him with part of his cavalry supported by infantry, wait for confusion, and
then exploit those vulnerabilities with his cavalry reserve. This had been his pat-
tern of operations in previous engagements with the Americans.
In the main line of battle, LEGEND
Morgan placed his Continen- American Forces
SITUATION AS OF
were former Continentals, on III
920
3rd (WASHINGTON)
0700
980
-N
mand. They numbered 450.
940
980
-
About 150 meters downhill, 960
yards
500
1-7
FM 3-90
SITUATION AS OF
was more ragged as it began 920 0730
980
-N
his right-hand troop of dra- 980 III 940
-
3rd (WASHINGTON)
goons to charge the militia as 960
CONTINENTALS
it withdrew. The American
940 920
(HOWARD)
Y II
I
I
As the British moved hastily
960
940
900 940
960
SITUATION AS OF
nized the danger to their right 920 0750
flank and ordered the right 940
960
940
980
-
3rd (WASHINGTON)
920 900
900 940
960
1-8
The Art of Tactics
into the British lines. Simultaneously, Morgan’s cavalry attacked the British right
from the rear. Meanwhile, the militia, having reformed, returned to the field on the
American right and attacked the British left flank units. (See Figure 1-3.) The bat-
tle was over within an hour of Tarleton’s first assault. The British losses were 110
killed, 200 wounded, and 700 prisoners, although Tarleton personally escaped
with about 140 of his cavalry. The British could not replace the mobile forces that
Tarleton lost at the Cowpens. Without a mobile force, the British no longer had an
effective counter to American partisans and light forces. The British later won at
Guilford Court House, but suffered such heavy losses that they had to abandon
their operations in the interior of the Carolinas.
Morgan combined the science of tactics with his application of the tactical art to
defeat superior numbers of British forces under Tarleton. Morgan arrived at a
unique and creative solution to his tactical problems. Trusted information about
Tarleton’s style was a crucial part of his deployment plan. Morgan understood the
diverse military and social elements of his force (untried militia, Continentals, and
volunteers). He asked no more of any element than it could deliver and used the
strengths of each to the fullest. Daniel Morgan used tactical art to convert his
understanding of American troops, knowledge of human nature, and rapport with
his soldiers into the vital components of a brilliant tactical victory.
1-9
FM 3-90
of the enemy situation, and his assessment of whether the assets available (to
include time), and the means to coordinate and synchronize those assets, are
adequate to accomplish the mission. If they are not he takes additional time
to plan and prepare for the operation or bring additional forces to bear on the
problem. The commander makes that choice in an environment of uncer-
tainty, which always entails some risk.
1-24. The commander may have to act based only on his available combat in-
formation in a time-constrained environment. Combat information is uneval-
uated data gathered by or provided to a commander that, due to its highly
perishable nature or the critical nature of the tactical situation, cannot be
processed into tactical intelligence or other staff products in time to meet the
commander’s information requirements (FM 6-0). The commander must un-
derstand the inherent risk of acting only on combat information since it is
vulnerable to enemy deception operations and can be misinterpreted at any
stage up through reporting channels. The unit intelligence staff helps the
commander assign a level of confidence to combat information he uses in deci-
sion making.
1-25. Uncertainty and risk are inherent in tactical operations and cannot be
eliminated. A commander cannot be successful without the capability of act-
ing under conditions of uncertainty while balancing various risks and taking
advantage of opportunities. Although the commander strives to maximize his
knowledge about his forces, the terrain and weather, civil considerations, and
the enemy, he cannot let a lack of information paralyze him. The more intelli-
gence on the enemy, the better able the commander is to make his assess-
ment. Less information means that the commander has a greater risk of
making a poor decision for the specific situation. A commander never has per-
fect intelligence, but knowing when he has enough information to make a de-
cision within the higher commander’s intent and constraints is part of the art
of tactics and is a critical skill for a commander.
1-26. The commander should take the minimum time necessary in planning
and preparing to ensure a reasonable chance of success. Reduced coordination
at the start of the operation results in less than optimum combat power
brought to bear on the enemy, but often allows for increased speed and mo-
mentum while possibly achieving surprise. The commander must balance the
effects of reduced coordination against the risk that the effects of increased
coordination will not match the enemy’s improved posture over time. The
more time the commander takes to prepare for the operation, including im-
proving his situational understanding, the more time the enemy has to pre-
pare and move additional units within supporting range or distance. Addi-
tionally, it reduces the time his subordinates have to conduct their own
planning and preparations. If the enemy can improve his disposition faster
than the friendly force can, the delays in execution decrease the commander’s
chances of success.
1-27. It is better to err on the side of speed, audacity, and momentum than on
the side of caution when conducting military operations, all else being equal.
Bold decisions give the best promise of success; however, one must differenti-
ate between calculated risks and a military gamble. A calculated risk is an
operation in which success is not a certainty but which, in case of failure,
leaves sufficient forces to cope with whatever situations arise (FM 6-0). The
1-10
The Art of Tactics
RISK REDUCTION
1-30. An important factor in reducing a commander’s risk is how much intel-
ligence he has about the enemy. As intelligence becomes available, the com-
mander determines where along the continuum of hasty versus deliberate
operations he will operate to accomplish his mission. There is no set of rules
to determine this point—any choice entails risk. If the commander decides to
execute a hasty operation based on limited intelligence, he risks an uncoordi-
nated operation against an enemy about which he knows little. Moreover his
forces may not be strong enough to accomplish their mission with minimum
casualties. This could lead to piecemeal commitment and potential defeat in
detail. He must balance this option against the risk of waiting to attack,
which allows the enemy time to reinforce or conduct additional preparation.
1-31. When higher headquarters determines the time to start an operation,
or in a defense when the enemy initiates the operation, the commander has
little flexibility regarding where to operate along the continuum of hasty
versus deliberate operations. In these situations he must use all the time
1-11
FM 3-90
1-12
The Art of Tactics
the disposition of the main body may change frequently. The commander
must continually weigh this balance and make adjustments as needed.
1-37. These adjustments can create problems. Too many changes or changes
made too rapidly in task organization, mission, and priorities can have nega-
tive effects on the operations process. For example, if a commander changes
the task organization of his force too frequently, the force fails to develop the
flexibility provided by teamwork. On the other hand, if he fails to change the
task organization when dictated by circumstances, the force lacks flexibility
to adapt to those changing circumstances. It is then unable to react effectively
to enemy moves or act with the concentration of effects that lead to mission
success.
1-13
FM 3-90
1-14
The Art of Tactics
solves the specific tactical problem facing him by following the general princi-
ples outlined in this manual, there is no single, doctrinally correct, procedur-
ally derived solution to any problem. The tactician who employs the more
appropriate tactics given the existing situation has a distinct advantage over
his opponent, even if their forces have equal combat power.
1-44. The tactician uses his mastery of the art and science of tactics, his
understanding of the situation, and his judgment to create unique solutions
appropriate to the mission and the other specific factors of METT-TC. There
are usually several solutions that might work, although some will be more ef-
fective. He seeks a solution that defeats the enemy in the time available at
the least cost in men and materiel. It should be a decisive solution that pos-
tures the unit for future missions and provides for the greatest flexibility to
account for unexpected enemy actions or reactions. The solution must be in
accordance with the higher commander’s intent. A thorough understanding of
the enemy greatly assists the commander in his development of workable so-
lutions. Commander’s visualization is the doctrinal term for this process.
(FM 6-0 describes commander’s visualization.)
1-45. The tactician learns to cut to the heart of a situation, recognize its im-
portant elements, and base his decisions on those important elements as he
masters his profession. The ability to do this cannot be acquired overnight. A
tactician develops this capability after years of schooling, self-study, and
practical training experiences, which eventually develop the intuitive facul-
ties required to solve tactical problems. He rarely gets the opportunity to
practice the science and art of tactics under actual combat conditions.
1-46. Doctrine requires human judgment when applied to a specific situation.
In choosing a solution to a tactical problem, applicable laws and regulations,
the mission, the laws of physics, human behavior, and logistic realities con-
strain the tactician, not standardized techniques and procedures. The true
test of the tactician’s solution is not whether it uses the specific techniques or
procedures contained in this manual, but whether the techniques and proce-
dures used were appropriate to the situation. Tactical proficiency is not de-
fined by mastery of written doctrine, but by the ability to employ available
means to win battles and engagements. A solution may not match any previ-
ous doctrinal example; however, the language used to communicate that con-
cept must be technically precise and doctrinally consistent, using commonly
understood and accepted doctrinal terms and concepts.
1-47. Transitions between the types and forms of operations are difficult and,
during execution, may create unexpected opportunities for Army or enemy
forces. The tactician must quickly recognize such opportunities. He develops
transitions as branches during the planning process and acts on them immed-
iately as they occur. Transition between one type or form of an operation to
another is a complex operational consideration.
1-48. Tactical victory occurs when the opposing enemy force can no longer
prevent the friendly force from accomplishing its mission. That is the end
goal of all military operations. Decisive tactical victory occurs when the en-
emy no longer has the means to oppose the friendly force. It also occurs when
the enemy admits defeat and agrees to a negotiated end of hostilities. Histori-
cally, a rapid tactical victory results in fewer friendly casualties and reduced
1-15
FM 3-90
resource expenditures. However, the tactician avoids gambling his forces and
losing his combined arms synchronization in search of rapid victory.
1-49. In closing, solutions to tactical problems are a collective effort. Success
results from the commander’s plan and the ability of subordinates to execute
it. The commander must have full confidence in his subordinates’ mastery of
the art and science of tactics and in their ability to execute the chosen solu-
tion. (See FM 6-0 for a full discussion of this concept.)
1-16
Chapter 2
The tactician must understand the common tactical concepts and defini-
tions used by the military profession in the conduct of offensive and de-
fensive operations. This chapter introduces the doctrinal hierarchy that
forms the framework by which this manual is organized. The concepts
and terms in this chapter are common to most operations. This manual
discusses those concepts and terms specific to a type or form of operations
in the corresponding chapter. For example, Chapter 4 discusses the objec-
tive as a control measure.
DOCTRINAL HIERARCHY
2-1. Figure 2-1 on page 2-2 shows the doctrinal hierarchy and relationship
between the types and subordinate forms of operations. While an operation’s
CONTENTS
Doctrinal Hierarchy......................................2-1 Basic Tactical Graphic Control
The Operational Framework .......................2-3 Measures .............................................. 2-10
Principles of War .........................................2-3 Air Corridor........................................... 2-11
Tenets of Army Operations.........................2-4 Area of Operations and Boundaries .. 2-12
The Factors of METT-TC .............................2-4 Assembly Areas ................................... 2-18
Elements of Operational Design ................2-4 Checkpoint ........................................... 2-19
Battlefield Operating Systems....................2-5 Contact Point........................................ 2-20
Basic Tactical Concepts .............................2-5 Critical Friendly Zone .......................... 2-20
Combined Arms ......................................2-6 Direct Fire Control Measures.............. 2-20
Decisively Engaged ................................2-6 Deep, Close, and Rear Areas .............. 2-24
Defeat in Detail ........................................2-7 Fire Support Coordination
Flanks.......................................................2-7 Measures .............................................. 2-26
Maneuver .................................................2-8 Fire Support Targets............................ 2-31
Mutual Support .......................................2-8 Forward Line of Own Troops.............. 2-32
Operation .................................................2-8 Line of Contact..................................... 2-32
Piecemeal Commitment .........................2-9 Names Area of Interest ........................ 2-33
Reconstitution.........................................2-9 Obstacle Control Measures ................ 2-33
Rules of Engagement .............................2-9 Phase Line ............................................ 2-37
Supporting Distance.............................2-10 Position Area of Artillery ..................... 2-37
Supporting Range.................................2-10 Route ..................................................... 2-38
Tactical Mobility....................................2-10 Targeted Area of Interest..................... 2-38
2-1
FM 3-90
TYPES OF
MILITARY OFFENSE DEFENSE STABILITY SUPPORT
OPNS
FORMS OF TYPES OF TYPES OF FORMS OF
MANEUVER DEFENSIVE STABILITY OPNS SUPPORT
TYPES OF —
—
Envelopment
Turning Movement
OPNS — PEACE OPNS OPNS
— AREA — FOREIGN INTERNAL – Relief Opns
MILITARY — Frontal Attack
DEFENSE DEFENSE – Support to
— Penetration — SECURITY ASSIST Incidents
OPNS — Infiltration — MOBILE — HUMANITARIAN & CIVIC Involving WMD
DEFENSE ASSIST – SPT to Civil Law
AND — RETROGRADE — SUPPORT TO Enforcement
TYPES OF
THEIR OFFENSIVE OPNS
OPERATIONS INSURGENCIES
— SUPPORT TO CD OPNS
– Community
Assistance
– Delay
SUBORD- —MOVEMENT TO CONTACT – Withdrawal
— CBTING TERRORISM
– Search and Attack — NONCOMBATANT TYPES OF
INATE —ATTACK
– Ambush*
– Retirement EVACUATION OPNS
SUPPORT
– Feint* — ARMS CONTROL
FORMS –
–
Counterattack*
Demonstration*
– Raid*
— SHOW OF FORCE OPERATIONS
*Also known as
— DOMESTIC SPT
– Spoiling Attack*
—EXPLOITATION special purpose OPNS
—PURSUIT attacks — FOREIGN
HUMANITARIAN
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE
2-2. The commander conducts tactical enabling operations to assist the plan-
ning, preparation, and execution of any of the four types of military opera-
tions (offense, defense, stability, and support). Tactical enabling operations
are never decisive operations in the context of offensive and defensive opera-
tions; they are either shaping or sustaining operations. Part IV of this man-
ual discusses tactical enabling operations that are not the subject of a sepa-
rate field manual. The commander uses tactical enabling operations to help
him conduct military actions with minimal risk.
2-2
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-3. This hierarchy does not describe discrete, mutually exclusive operations.
All tactical missions can contain elements of several different types and sub-
ordinate forms. For example, an attacking commander may have one subordi-
nate conducting an envelopment, with another subordinate conducting a
frontal attack to fix the enemy. The enveloping force usually attacks once the
direct-pressure force makes a movement to contact while repeatedly
attacking to keep pressure on the fleeing enemy. The encircling force uses an
envelopment to conduct a series of attacks to destroy or clear enemy forces in
its path on the way to its blocking position. Once it occupies the blocking posi-
tion, the unit may transition to a defense as it blocks the retreat of the fleeing
enemy force.
PRINCIPLES OF WAR
2-6. The nine principles of war defined in FM 3-0 provide general guidance
for conducting war and military operations other than war at the strategic,
operational, and tactical levels. They are fundamental truths governing
combat operations. The principles are the enduring bedrock of Army doctrine.
First published in 1923 as general principles in Field Service Regulations
United States Army, they have stood the tests of analysis, experimentation,
and practice. They are not a checklist and their degree of application varies
with the situation. Blind adherence to these principles does not guarantee
success, but each deviation may increase the risk of failure. The principles of
war lend rigor and focus to the purely creative aspects of tactics and provide a
crucial link between pure theory and actual application.
2-3
FM 3-90
2-4
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-5
FM 3-90
COMBINED ARMS
2-12. Combined arms is the synchronized or simultaneous application of
several arms—such as infantry, armor, artillery, engineers, air defense, and
aviation—to achieve an effect on the enemy that is greater than if each arm
was used against the enemy separately or in sequence (FM 3-0). Weapons and
units are more effective when they operate in concert. No single action,
weapon, branch, or arm of service generates sufficient power to achieve the
effects required to dominate an opponent.
2-13. Combined arms is more than the combat arms working together. Each
branch of the Army provides unique capabilities that complement the other
branches. A combined arms team consists of two or more arms supporting one
another. The commander takes his available combat, combat support (CS),
and combat service support (CSS) elements and forms them into a combined
arms team focused on mission accomplishment. The proper combination of
actions and systems by the combined arms team is the essence of combined
arms. The use of combined arms provides complementary and reinforcing ef-
fects and may have asymmetrical effects on an enemy force. (See FM 3-0 for
more information on symmetrical and asymmetrical effects.)
2-14. Armor, attack helicopter, and infantry units are normally the nucleus
of the combined arms team. However, emerging capabilities allow the com-
mander to use any combat arms unit, such as artillery and aviation, to form
that nucleus. The commander uses his combat arms forces in different combi-
nations to provide flexibility in conducting different types of operations in
varied terrain. For example, a commander may have his infantry lead in
mountains and cities when moving dismounted, while his armor leads in open
terrain. Attack helicopters can deliver large quantities of precision munitions
throughout the AO. A commander can conduct decisive operations using field
artillery Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) and cannons augmented
by the effects of fixed-wing aviation, given the correct conditions. Air defense
artillery destroys enemy aerial assets to assist the free movement of the
friendly force. Engineers enhance the friendly force’s mobility, degrade the
enemy’s mobility, and assist in providing for survivability of the friendly
force. Combat support and CSS members of the combined arms team support
the combined arms nucleus by combining capabilities in an appropriate
manner to support and sustain the combined arms force.
DECISIVE ENGAGEMENT
2-15. A decisive engagement is an engagement in which a unit is considered
fully committed and cannot maneuver or extricate itself. In the absence of
outside assistance, the action must be fought to a conclusion and either won
or lost with the forces at hand (JP 1-02). The unit’s mission is what usually
results in the acceptance of decisive engagement rather than the unit’s
physical ability to extricate itself. For example, a unit might become
decisively engaged to hold key terrain, defeat a specific enemy force, or secure
a specific objective. Less common is a defender’s decisive engagement as a
result of being placed in a position of disadvantage by an attacker.
2-6
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
DEFEAT IN DETAIL
2-16. Defeat in detail is achieved by concentrating overwhelming
combat power against separate parts of a force rather than defeating
the entire force at once. A smaller force can use this technique to achieve
success against a larger enemy. Defeat in detail can occur sequentially (de-
feat of separate elements one at a time in succession). For example, a com-
mander can mass overwhelming combat power effects against an enemy
element outside the supporting distance of the rest of the enemy force. This
allows the commander to destroy the targeted enemy element before it can be
effectively reinforced.
FLANKS
2-17. Flanks are the right
or left limits of a unit. For
a stationary unit, they are ENEMY LOCATION
designated in terms of an TEAM TEAM
enemy’s actual or expected LEFT FLANK RIGHT FLANK
location. (See Figure 2-2.)
For a moving unit, they are
defined by the direction of
movement. (See Figure 2-3.)
The commanders tries to
deny the enemy opportuni- BP 74
ties to engage his flanks be-
cause a force cannot concen-
trate as much direct fire on
the flanks as it can to the
front. Commanders seek to
engage enemy flanks for the
same reason. Figure 2-2. Flanks of a Stationary Unit
2-7
FM 3-90
link into other forces. When a commander has an assailable flank, he may at-
tempt to refuse it by using various techniques, such as supplementary posi-
tions.
2-19. A flanking position is a geographical location on the flank of a
force from which effective fires can be placed on that flank. An attack-
ing commander maneuvers to occupy flanking positions against a defending
force to place destructive fires directly against enemy vulnerabilities. A
defending commander maneuvers to occupy flanking positions on the flanks
of a hostile route of advance for the same reason. A flanking position that an
advancing enemy can readily avoid has little value to the defender unless the
enemy does not realize it is occupied.
MANEUVER
2-20. Maneuver is the employment of forces on the battlefield through move-
ment in combination with fire, or fire potential, to achieve a position of ad-
vantage in respect to the enemy in order to accomplish the mission (JP 1-02).
Maneuver creates and exposes enemy vulnerabilities to the massed effects of
friendly combat power. A commander employs his elements of combat power
in symmetrical and asymmetrical ways so as to attain positional advantage
over an enemy and be capable of applying those massed effects.
MUTUAL SUPPORT
2-21. Mutual support is that support which units render to each other
against an enemy because of their assigned tasks, their position relative to
each other and to the enemy, and their inherent capabilities (JP 1-02). Mu-
tual support exists between two or more positions when they support one
another by direct or indirect fire, thus preventing the enemy from attacking
one position without being fired on from one or more adjacent positions. That
same relationship applies to units moving with relation to each other, except
they can maneuver to obtain positional advantage to achieve that support. It
is normally associated with fire and movement (maneuver), although it can
also relate to the provision of CS and CSS.
2-22. In the defense, the commander selects tactical positions to achieve the
maximum degree of mutual support. Mutual support increases the strength
of defensive positions, prevents the enemy from attempting to defeat the at-
tacking friendly forces in detail, and helps prevent infiltration. In the offense,
the commander maneuvers his forces to ensure a similar degree of support
between attacking elements.
OPERATION
2-23. An operation is a military action or the carrying out of a strategic,
tactical, service, training, or administrative military mission (JP 1-02). It
includes the process of planning, preparing, executing, and assessing those
offensive, defensive, stability, and support operations needed to gain the
objectives of any engagement, battle, major action, or campaign. It also
includes activities that enable the performance of full spectrum operations,
such as security, reconnaissance, and troop movement.
2-8
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
PIECEMEAL COMMITMENT
2-24. Piecemeal commitment is the immediate employment of units in
combat as they become available instead of waiting for larger ag-
gregations of units to ensure mass, or the unsynchronized employ-
ment of available forces so that their combat power is not employed
effectively. Piecemeal commitment subjects the smaller committed forces to
defeat in detail and prevents the massing and synchronizing of combat power
with following combat and CS elements. However, piecemeal commitment
may be advantageous to maintain momentum and to retain or exploit the ini-
tiative. A commander may require piecemeal commitment of a unit to rein-
force a faltering operation, especially if the commitment of small units pro-
vide all of the combat power needed to avert disaster. The “pile-on” technique
associated with search and attack operations employs the piecemeal commit-
ment of troops. (See Chapter 5 for a discussion of search and attack opera-
tions.)
RECONSTITUITON
2-25. Reconstitution is those actions that commanders plan and implement to
restore units to a desired level of combat effectiveness commensurate with
mission requirements and available resources. Reconstitution operations
include regeneration and reorganization (FM 4-100.9). Reconstitution is a
total process. It is not solely a CSS operation, though CSS plays an integral
role. The commander conducts reconstitution when one of his subordinate
units becomes combat ineffective or when he can raise its combat effec-
tiveness closer to the desired level by shifting available resources. Besides
normal support actions, reconstitution may include—
· Removing the unit from combat.
· Assessing it with external assets.
· Reestablishing the chain of command.
· Training the unit for future operations.
· Reestablishing unit cohesion.
2-26. Reconstitution transcends normal day-to-day force sustainment actions.
However, it uses existing systems and units to do so. No resources exist solely
to perform reconstitution. (See FM 4-100.9.)
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
2-27. Rules of engagement (ROE) are directives issued by competent military
authority which delineate the circumstances and limitations under which
United States forces will initiate and/or continue combat engagement with
other forces encountered (JP 1-02). Operational requirements, policy, and law
define the commander’s ROE. Rules of engagement impact on how a com-
mander conducts his operations in all four types of military operations by im-
posing political, practical, operational, and legal limitations on his actions.
They may extend to criteria for initiating engagements with certain weapon
systems, such as employing unobserved indirect fires within the echelon rear
area, or reacting to an attack. They always recognize the right of self-defense
and the commander’s right and obligation to protect assigned personnel.
CJCSI 3121.01A establishes the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s standing ROE.
2-9
FM 3-90
SUPPORTING DISTANCE
2-28. Supporting distance is the distance between two units that can be
traveled in time for one to come to the aid of the other. For small units, it is
the distance between two units that can be covered effectively by their fires
(FM 3-0). Supporting distance is a factor of combat power, dispositions, com-
munications capability, and tactical mobility of friendly and enemy forces.
SUPPORTING RANGE
2-29. Supporting range is the distance one unit may be geographically
separated from a second unit, yet remain within the maximum range of the
second unit’s indirect fire weapons systems. (FM 3-0). Major factors that af-
fect supporting range are terrain relief, the range of the supporting unit’s
weapon systems, and their locations in relation to the supported unit’s posi-
tion.
TACTICAL MOBILITY
2-30. Tactical mobility is the ability to move rapidly from one part of
the battlefield to another, relative to the enemy. Tactical mobility is a
function of cross-country mobility, firepower, and protection. The terrain, soil
conditions, and weather affect cross-country mobility. Heavy ground maneu-
ver units have good tactical mobility—except in restrictive terrain—combined
with firepower and protection. They can move on the battlefield against most
enemy forces unless faced with an enemy who can defeat their protection and
cannot be suppressed by friendly fires. Light ground maneuver units have a
tactical mobility advantage against enemy heavy forces in restrictive terrain,
but limited firepower and protection. Army aviation maneuver units have
good tactical mobility in most types of terrain, good firepower, but limited
protection. Extreme weather conditions can restrict the tactical mobility of
Army aviation units.
2-10
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-11
FM 3-90
BI
the joint force commander
RD
for land and naval forces.
ACP
Areas of operations do not
MA
3
typically encompass the A N
IR D M
N
entire operational area of
the joint force commander,
ACP B
2
but should be large enough
for component command- Figure 2-4. Generic Air Corridor
ers to accomplish their
missions and protect their forces (JP 1-02). The joint force land component
commander (JFLCC) or the Army service component command (ASCC)
commander will in turn assign their subordinates their own AOs. Those
subordinates will further assign their subordinates AOs down to the battalion
or company level based on the factors of METT-TC. A unit assigned an AO,
the owning unit, may not change control measures imposed by a higher
headquarters within their AO. However, it may establish additional control
measures to coordinate and synchronize its operations.
2-37. Assigning an AO to a subordi-
An avenue of approach is
nate headquarters maximizes decen-
the air or ground route
tralized execution by empowering
leading to an objective (or
subordinate commanders to use their
key terrain in its path) that
own initiative to accomplish their
an attacking force can use.
assigned missions. This encourages
the use of mission command. (See FM 6-0 for a discussion of mission com-
mand.) At the same time it adds the responsibilities listed in Paragraph 2-40
below to the lower headquarters. Conversely, failure to designate subordinate
AOs maximizes centralized execution and limits the subordinates’ tactical
options. The latter choice should be made only when mandated by the factors
of METT-TC. For example, a brigade commander responsible for blocking an
enemy advance along a single avenue of approach may assign his subordinate
battalions battle positions to support a brigade engagement area (EA) instead
of subdividing his AO and the avenue of approach into battalion AOs.
2-38. A higher headquarters designates an AO using boundaries. It normally
assigns an AO to a maneuver unit, but it may also assign one to CS or CSS
units. Having an AO assigned both restricts and facilitates the movement of
units and use of fires. It restricts units not assigned responsibility for the AO
from moving through the AO. It also restricts outside units from firing into or
allowing the effects of its fires to affect the AO. Both of these restrictions can
be relaxed through coordination with the owning unit. It facilitates the move-
ment and fires of the unit assigned responsibility for, or owning, the AO. The
assigned AO must encompass enough terrain for the commander to accom-
plish his mission and protect his forces.
2-12
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
Terrain Management
2-41. The commander assigned an AO is responsible for terrain management
within its boundaries. A higher headquarters may dictate that another unit
position itself within a subordinate unit’s AO, but the commander assigned
the AO retains final approval authority for the exact placement. This ensures
the unit commander controlling the AO knows what units are in his AO and
where they are located so that he can deconflict operations, control move-
ment, and prevent fratricide. Only the owning commander assigns subordi-
nate unit boundaries within the AO.
Movement Control
2-42. Units may not move across boundaries into another unit’s AO without
receiving clearance from the unit owning the AO. Once assigned an AO, the
owning unit controls movement throughout the AO. The designation, mainte-
nance, route security, and control of movement along routes within an AO are
the responsibility of the owning unit unless the higher echelon’s coordinating
instructions direct otherwise. The commander may designate movement
routes as open, supervised, dispatch, reserved, or prohibited. Each route’s
designation varies based on the factors of METT-TC. FM 4-01.30 discusses
movement planning and control measures.
2-13
FM 3-90
Fires
2-43. Within its AO, the owning unit may employ any direct or indirect fire
system without receiving further clearance from superior headquarters.
There are three exceptions: The first and most common is that a unit may not
use munitions within its own AO without receiving appropriate clearance if
the effects of those munitions extend beyond its AO. For example, if a unit
wants to use smoke, its effects cannot cross boundaries into another AO
unless cleared with the adjacent owning unit. Second, higher headquarters
may explicitly restrict the use of certain munitions within an AO or parts of
an AO, such as long-duration scatterable mines. Third, higher headquarters
may impose a restrictive fire support coordinating measure (FSCM) within an
AO to protect some asset or facility, such as a no-fire area around a camp
housing dislocated civilians. These FSCM tend to be linear in nature in a con-
tiguous AO while they are more likely areas in a noncontiguous AO.
2-44. The commander may not employ indirect fires across boundaries with-
out receiving clearance from the unit into whose AO the fires will impact. He
may employ direct fires across boundaries without clearance at specific point
targets that are clearly and positively identified as enemy.
Security
2-45. The security of all units operating within the AO is the responsibility of
the owning commander. This fact does not require that commander to con-
duct area security operations throughout his AO. (See Chapter 12 for a dis-
cussion of area security responsibilities.) He must prevent surprise and pro-
vide the amount of time necessary for all units located within the AO to
effectively respond to enemy actions by employing security forces around
those units. If the commander cannot or chooses not to provide security
throughout his AO, he must clearly inform all concerned individuals of when,
where, and under what conditions he is not going to exercise this function.
The commander generally depicts these locations using permissive FSCM.
Each unit commander remains responsible for his unit’s local security.
2-14
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
that liaison capability with the airspace control authority (ACA). (See
FM 3-52 and JP 3-52 for additional information regarding airspace control
doctrine.)
2-48. The vertical dimension, or airspace, of the AO is inherently permissive
because all branches and services require the use of airspace. There are pro-
cedural and positive airspace control measures (ACM) available to synchro-
nize military operations in the airspace above the AO. Among the procedural
ACM is the coordinating altitude, which separates fixed- and rotary-wing air-
craft by determining an altitude below which fixed-wing aircraft will norm-
ally not fly and above which rotary-wing aircraft will normally not fly. It al-
lows the ground commander to use the airspace above his AO for his organic
aviation assets to complement ground maneuver forces, but it is not a bound-
ary for which he has responsibility. The ACA, normally the joint force air
component commander, must establish the coordinating altitude, promulgate
it through the airspace control plan, address it in the airspace control order,
and include a buffer zone for small altitude deviations. Coordinating altitudes
are permissive ACM.
Boundaries
2-49. A boundary is a line that delineates surface areas for the purpose of
facilitating coordination and deconfliction of operations between adjacent
units, formations, or areas (JP 0-2). The commander uses graphic control
measures to define the limits of an AO and, as such, establish ground forces’
responsibilities. He uses ACM to control the vertical dimension. The com-
mander bases his subordinates’ boundaries on clearly defined terrain fea-
tures. This requirement is less important if all units in the AO have precision
navigation capabilities. Boundaries should not split roads, rivers, or railways.
Responsibility for an avenue of approach and key terrain should belong to
only one unit. The commander adjusts his boundaries as necessary in re-
sponse to the evolving tactical situation. Any areas not delegated to a subord-
inate remain the responsibility of the commander.
2-15
FM 3-90
BRIGADE
FORWARD XX XX
BOUNDARIES DIVISION DEEP DIVISION DEEP BRIGADE
AREA AREA SECURITY
X AREAS
X X X X
X X
X
FEBA
DIVISION BRIGADE
FEBA
CLOSE LATERAL
CORPS
XXX
DIVISION
X LATERAL X
xx
XXX
AREA X BOUNDARY
BOUNDARIES CLOSE
X X AREA
X X X X
II DIVISION DIVISION
RESERVE REAR
DIVISION REAR AREA AREA BRIGADE
REAR
xx xx BOUNDARIES
CORPS
DIVISION REAR BOUNDARIES
REAR BOUNDARY
CORPS REAR AREA
XXX
2-52. The commander bases his decision to establish contiguous AOs on his
analysis of the factors of METT-TC. Units with contiguous AOs are normally
within supporting distance of one another and may be within supporting
range. Other reasons why a commander establishes contiguous AOs include—
· Limited size of the AO in relation to the number of friendly forces.
· Decisive points in close physical proximity to each other.
· Political boundaries or enemy force concentrations require establishing
contiguous AOs.
· Reduced risk of being defeated in detail because of an incomplete op-
erational picture or when the friendly force is significantly outnum-
bered.
· Greater concentration of combat power along a single avenue of
approach or movement corridor.
2-16
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-53. A noncontiguous AO does not have distinctive forward, rear, and lateral
boundaries. It is established by a boundary that encloses the entire area.
Subordinate boundaries will be continuous, 360-degree arcs that closely ap-
proximate the subordinate unit’s area of influence. For example, the com-
mander would normally place a noncontiguous brigade boundary at the limit
of observed fires for its security forces. Because noncontiguous boundaries
must provide all-around security, they generally allow for less concentration
of combat power along a single axis. A brigade, division, or corps commander
who establishes noncontiguous AOs for his subordinates still designates an
echelon rear area. Battle positions are not AOs since a unit is not restricted
from operating outside its battle position. A commander who deploys his sub-
ordinates into battle positions is not conducting noncontiguous operations.
Chapter 8 defines a battle position.
2-54. Operations directed against enemy forces and systems outside a non-
contiguous AO are the responsibility of the organization that owns that loca-
tion. For example, in Figure 2-6 the middle enemy division is the corps’ re-
sponsibility since it is not within either of the corps’ two divisions’ AOs.
SPT
SPT
SPT DAG
III
DAG III
III
X DAG III III
III
X III
X
II III
X
II
II III II
X
II X
X
XX
II
X
X
X X
X
X
X
SPF II
X
SPF
XXX
SPF
DIVISION X DSA
AO DIVISION
ROUTE C
AO
CORPS
SPF
JSOA X
{
AO
{
BLACK XX
X X
X X
LARK
2-17
FM 3-90
ASSEMBLY AREAS
2-57. An assembly area (AA) is an area a unit occupies to prepare for
an operation. Ideally, an assembly area provides—
· Concealment from air and ground observation.
· Cover from direct fire.
· Space for dispersion; separate each AA by enough distance from other
AAs to preclude mutual interference.
· Adequate entrances, exits, and internal routes.
· Good drainage and soil conditions that can sustain the movement of the
unit’s vehicles and individual soldiers.
· Terrain masking of electromagnetic signatures.
· Terrain allowing observation of ground and air avenues into the AA.
· Sanctuary from enemy medium-range artillery fires because of its
location outside the enemy’s range.
2-18
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-58. The commander assigns each unit its own AA. In Figure 2-7, the ex-
ample of multiple units occupying one AA is a graphical shortcut taken when
the map scale would make depiction of multiple assembly areas unreadable.
In reality, the commander would subdivide AA Thomas into two smaller AAs,
one for each unit. A unit AA is normally within the AO of another unit. An
AA area is usually treated as a noncontiguous AO. This means that a unit has
the same responsibilities within its assigned AA as it has for any other AO.
AA MEADE II
II 3 68 AA ORD
3 68
OCCUPIED OCCUPIED
{
II
3 68 AA HANCOCK
AA THOMAS
II 3 68
2 13
2-59. The proper location of AAs contributes significantly to both security and
flexibility. It should facilitate future operations so movement to subsequent
positions can take place smoothly and quickly by concealed routes. Because of
their smaller signature, light units can use AAs closer to the enemy than
heavy units without excessive risk of enemy detection. The tactical mobility of
heavy units allows them to occupy AAs at a greater distance from the line of
departure (LD) than light units.
CHECKPOINT
2-60. A checkpoint is a predetermined
CP 13
point on the ground used to control move-
ment, tactical maneuver, and orientation.
Units can also use a checkpoint as a fire control
measure in lieu of the preferred control meas-
ure, a target reference point. Checkpoints are
useful for orientation. Units may use check-
points to supplement or as substitutes for phase
lines (PLs). They are also used in the conduct of
CSS. Figure 2-8 depicts Checkpoint 13. Figure 2-8. Checkpoint 13
2-19
FM 3-90
CONTACT POINT
2-61. A contact point is an easily identi-
fiable point on the terrain where two or
more ground units are required to make
physical contact. A commander establishes a
contact point where a PL crosses a lateral
071830Z
FEB02 8
boundary or on other identifiable terrain as a
technique to ensure coordination between two
units. He provides a date-time group to
indicate when to make that physical contact. Figure 2-9. Contact Point 8
Figure 2-9 depicts Contact Point 8.
2-62. The mutual higher commander of two moving units normally desig-
nates the location of contact points and times of contact. When one unit is sta-
tionary, its commander normally designates the location of the contact point
and the meeting time, and transmits this information to the commander of
the moving unit.
2-20
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
Engagement Area
2-65. An engagement area (EA) is an area where the commander in-
tends to contain and destroy an enemy force with the massed effects
of all available weapons and supporting systems. This includes organic
direct fire systems and supporting systems, such as close air support. Fig-
ure 2-10 depicts several EAs used within the context of a battalion defense.
The commander determines the size and shape of the EA by the relatively un-
obstructed intervisibility from the weapon systems in their firing positions
and the maximum range of those weapons. The commander designates EAs
to cover each enemy avenue of approach into his position. He also can use
them to designate known or suspected enemy locations. Once the commander
selects his EA, he arrays his forces in positions to concentrate overwhelming
effects into these areas. He routinely subdivides his EA into smaller EAs for
his subordinates using one or more target reference points or by prominent
terrain features. The commander assigns sectors of fires to subordinates to
prevent fratricide, but responsibility for an avenue of approach or key terrain
is never split. These sectors normally do not affect friendly maneuver. Com-
manders of units up to battalion task force size normally use this control
measure.
PL JOANN
DISENGAGEMENT
LINE EA
EA ALPHA OMEGA
+ +
NZ1542
I
NZ1540
+
I
TRIGGER
+
TRIGGER NZ1539 NZ1541
LINE/ LINE/
PL JAN PL PEGGY
I I
+
NZ1545
EA + NZ1543
TRIGGER LINE/
PL DICK
PHI
+ NZ1544
I
Engagement Criteria
2-66. Engagement criteria are protocols that specify those circum-
stances for initiating engagement with an enemy force. They may be
restrictive or permissive. For example, a company commander could tell his
1st Platoon to wait until three enemy tanks reach a target reference point
2-21
FM 3-90
Engagement Priority
2-67. Engagement priority specifies the order in which the unit en-
gages enemy systems or functions. The commander assigns engagement
priorities based on the type or level of threat at different ranges to match
organic weapon systems capabilities against enemy vulnerabilities. Engage-
ment priorities are situationally dependent. The commander uses engage-
ment priorities to distribute fires rapidly and effectively. Subordinate ele-
ments can have different engagement priorities. For example, the commander
establishes his engagement priorities so that his M2 Bradley fighting vehicles
engage enemy infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers while
his M1 Abrams tanks engage enemy tanks. Normally, units engage the most
dangerous targets first, followed by targets in depth.
Sector of Fire
2-68. A sector of fire is that
area assigned to a unit, a
crew-served weapon, or an ENCLOSED PRIMARY
2-22
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
Trigger Line
2-70. A trigger line is a
DIRECT-FIRE FIRE SUPPORT
phase line used to initiate TRIGGER TRIGGER
and mass fires into an LINE LINE
engagement area or an
objective at a predeter- ENY
2-23
FM 3-90
likely to traverse in the time it takes from when fires are requested to when
artillery rounds impact. (See Figure 2-13.) This gives time for the fire support
systems to respond to the initial call for fire. For example, in a desert envi-
ronment—a battalion task force commander’s fire support trigger line is ap-
proximately four kilometers beyond the point where he wants to engage the
enemy with indirect fires when he has M109A6 howitzers in direct support. It
is approximately six kilometers when he has M109A3 howitzers in direct sup-
port. The shorter distance reflects the more rapid response capabilities of the
M109A6 compared to the M109A3, all other factors being equal.
2-72. The commander can establish another trigger line for his most accurate
long-range weapon system in the vicinity of the area where the fire support
impacts to capitalize on the asymmetric attack. However, dust and debris
resulting from the artillery fire may prevent his direct-fire systems from
engaging the enemy. He establishes other trigger lines and TRPs for shorter-
range systems. He may give guidance to extremely proficient crews to engage
the enemy at longer than normal ranges or give them different engagement
priorities than the rest of the force, such as giving priority to engaging air de-
fense or engineer-breaching systems. This could result in losing the effect
that the sudden application of massed fires has on an enemy.
2-73. When the enemy reaches these closer trigger lines, the commander es-
tablishes a decision point to help him determine if he wants his longer-range
systems to continue to fire in depth or to concentrate his fires on a single
point. Many factors impact his decision, most of which concern the enemy and
how he maneuvers and the effects of the defending force’s fires.
Deep Area
2-75. When designated, the deep area is an area forward of the close area
that commanders use to shape enemy forces before they are encountered or
engaged in the close area (FM 3-0). It extends from the subordinate’s forward
boundary to the forward boundary of the controlling echelon. Thus, the deep
area relates to the close area not only in terms of geography but also in terms
of purpose and time. The extent of the deep area depends on how far out the
force can acquire information and strike targets. Commanders may place
forces or employ effects in the deep area to conduct shaping operations. Some
of these operations may involve close combat. However, most ground maneu-
ver forces stay in the close area.
2-76. New weapon systems and advanced information technology continue to
increase the capability of Army forces to engage enemy forces in depth. In the
past, deep attacks aimed to slow and disrupt the advance of enemy forces.
2-24
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
Today, Army forces may engage enemy formations with precision fires at
substantial distances from the close area. This capability allows the
commander to employ greater depth and simultaneity of action than ever
before when conducting operations.
BRIGADE
FORWARD XX XX
BOUNDARIES DIVISION DEEP DIVISION DEEP BRIGADE
AREA AREA SECURITY
X AREAS
X X X X
X X
X
FEBA
DIVISION BRIGADE
FEBA
CLOSE LATERAL
CORPS
XXX
DIVISION
X LATERAL X
xx
XXX
AREA X BOUNDARY
BOUNDARIES CLOSE
X X AREA
X X X X
II DIVISION DIVISION
RESERVE REAR
DIVISION REAR AREA AREA BRIGADE
REAR
xx xx BOUNDARIES
CORPS
DIVISION REAR BOUNDARIES
REAR BOUNDARY
CORPS REAR AREA
XXX
Close Area
2-77. When designated, the close area is where forces are in immediate con-
tact with the enemy and the fighting between the committed forces and
readily available tactical reserves of both combatants is occurring, or where
commanders envision close combat taking place. Typically, the close area
assigned to a maneuver force extends from its subordinates’ rear boundaries
to its own forward boundary (FM 3-0). Typically, the close area is where the
majority of close combat occurs. It also includes the activities of forces directly
supporting the fighting elements, such as direct support field artillery and
logistics elements. The close area is historically the only location where the
commander could conduct his decisive operation. One unit may conduct the
decisive operation, while another conducts shaping operations within a close
area. Division commanders whose AOs constitute the corps close area have
the option of designating their own deep, close, and rear areas. Figure 2-14
illustrates this option.
Rear Area
2-78. Unlike close and deep areas, a rear area can be designated by the
commander regardless of the organization of his AO into contiguous or
2-25
FM 3-90
2-26
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
Permissive FSCM
2-82. The primary purpose of permissive measures is to facilitate the attack
of targets. Once they are established, further coordination is not required to
engage targets affected by the measures. Permissive FSCM include a
coordinated fire line, fire support coordination line, and free-fire area.
2-83. Coordinated Fire Line. A
coordinated fire line (CFL) is a
line beyond which conventional,
direct, and indirect surface fire CFL (1ST BDE)
support means may fire at any 080003Z
time within the boundaries of the FLOT FLOT
establishing headquarters without
additional coordination. The pur- 3X1 1X 2
pose of the CFL is to expedite the
surface-to-surface attack of tar-
gets beyond the CFL without co-
ordination with the ground com-
Figure 2-15. Coordinated Fire Line
mander in whose area the targets
are located (JP 3-09). Brigades or divisions usually establish a CFL, although
a maneuver battalion may establish one. It is located as close as possible to
the establishing unit without interfering with maneuver forces to open up the
area beyond to fire support. A higher echelon may consolidate subordinate
unit CFLs. If this occurs, any changes to the subordinate CFLs are co-
ordinated with the subordinate headquarters. (See Figure 2-15.)
2-84. Fire Support Coordination
Line. The fire support coordination line PL III CORPS FSCL
(FSCL) is a FSCM that is established and
IRON EFF 202100Z-270800 SEP
adjusted by appropriate land or
amphibious force commanders within
III (US)
2-27
FM 3-90
of targets beyond the FSCL. However, failure to do so may increase the risk
of fratricide and could waste limited resources (JP 3-09).
2-85. The commander designating a FSCL remains responsible for estab-
lishing the priority, effects, and timing of fires impacting beyond the FSCL.
Coordination for attacks beyond the FSCL is through the air tasking order.
The appropriate land or amphibious commander controls attacks short of the
FSCL. That commander uses the tactical air control system or the Army air-
ground system to control the execution of close air support (CAS).
2-86. Free-Fire Area. A free-fire area (FFA)
is a specific area into which any weapon
system may fire without additional coordina-
tion with the establishing headquarters
(JP 3-09). Normally, division or higher head- FFA
quarters establish a FFA on identifiable ter- 080800-082000ZJUL
rain. (See Figure 2-17.) 1CD
Restrictive FSCM
2-87. A restrictive FSCM prevents fires into
Figure 2-17. Free-Fire Area
or beyond the control measure without
detailed coordination. The primary purpose of restrictive measures is to
provide safeguards for friendly forces. Restrictive FSCM include an airspace
coordination area, no-fire area, restrictive fire area, and restrictive fire line.
Establishing a restrictive measure imposes certain requirements for specific
coordination before the engagement of those targets affected by the measure.
2-88. Airspace Coordination Area. The airspace coordination area (ACA)
is a three-dimensional block of airspace in a target area, established by the
appropriate ground commander, in which friendly aircraft are reasonably
safe from friendly surface fires. The airspace coordination area may be formal
or informal (JP 3-09.3). Time, space, or altitude separates aircraft and indi-
rect fire. The purpose of the ACA is to allow the simultaneous attack of tar-
gets near each other by fixed-wing aircraft and other fire support means.
Several techniques may be used in this role. The technique selected depends
on the time available, tactical situation, unit SOPs, and state of training.
(FM 3-52 defines ACM.)
2-89. The airspace control authority establishes formal ACAs at the request
of the appropriate ground commander. This is normally a separate brigade or
higher-echelon commander. Formal ACAs require detailed planning. The de-
sign of the ACA’s vertical and lateral limits allows freedom of action for air
and surface fire support for the greatest number of foreseeable targets.
2-90. The echelon fire support cell coordinates the location and extent of the
ACM with the A2C2) element and the fire direction center. It is located above
the target area as recommended by the air liaison element to the fire support
cell. The type of aircraft and the ordnance dictate the size of the area. Vital
information defining the formal ACA includes minimum and maximum
altitudes, a baseline designated by grid coordinates at each end, the width of
the ACA from either side of the baseline, and effective times. (See Fig-
ure 2-18.)
2-28
Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
III
U
XX S
ED ACA 2A
LLI D
A X 2AD
II XX US MIN ALT: 400
III MAX ALT: 2700
EFF 080600-080630Z
2A
91 XX D D
7
CS 2A X
G X D
4M
2-91. The maneuver commander may establish informal ACAs. He may sep-
arate aircraft and surface fires by distance (lateral, altitude, or a combina-
tion) or by time. Lateral separation is effective for coordinating fires against
targets that are adequately separated by at least one kilometer from flight
routes to ensure aircraft protection from the effects of friendly fires. An ex-
ample of a lateral separation technique is: “Aircraft stay west of grid line 62.”
Altitude separation is effective for coordinating fires when aircraft remain
above indirect fire trajectories and their effects. This technique is effective
when aircrews and firing units engage the same or nearby targets. An ex-
ample of altitude separation is: “Aircraft remain above 3000 feet mean sea
level in quadrant northwest of grid PK7325.”
2-92. A combination of lateral and altitude separation is the most restrictive
technique for aircraft and may be required when aircraft must cross the gun
target line of a firing unit. Time separation requires the most detailed
coordination and may be required when aircraft must fly near indirect-fire
trajectories or ordnance effects. The commander must coordinate the timing
of surface fires with aircraft routing. This ensures that even though aircraft
and surface fires may occupy the same space, they do not do so at the same
time. Surface and air-to-ground fires should be synchronized. All timing for
surface fires will be based on a specific aircraft event time. Fire support
personnel and tactical air controllers should select the separation technique
that requires the least coordination without adversely affecting timely fires or
the aircrew’s ability to safely complete the mission.
2-29
FM 3-90
2-30
______________________________________ Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
A1B
AG1712 AG1712 AG1706
AG1709
AG1717
POINT
TARGET GROUP OF CIRCULAR
TARGETS TARGET
A1B
AG1711
AG1723
AG1717 AG1201
AG7005 AG1744
2-97. Doctrine classifies each fire support target as either a planned target or
a target of opportunity. Targets of opportunity are not planned in advance
and are engaged as they present themselves in accordance with established
engagement criteria and rules of engagement. Planned targets are ones on
which fires are prearranged, although the degree of this prearrangement may
vary.
2-98. Individually planned fire support targets may be further subdivided
into scheduled and on-call fires. Scheduled targets are planned targets on
2-31
FM 3-90__________________________________________________________________________________
which field artillery and other fire support assets deliver their fires in accord-
ance with a pre-established time schedule and sequence. On-call targets are
planned targets engaged in response to a request for fires rather than in ac-
cordance with an established time schedule. An on-call target requires less
reaction time than a target of opportunity. The degree of prearrangement for
the on-call target influences the reaction time from request to execution–the
greater the prearrangement, the faster the reaction time. Priority targets are
an example of on-call targets that have short reaction times since each prio-
rity target has a fire unit placed on it when it is not engaged in other fire mis-
sions. The final protective fires (FPF) of A Battery, 1st Battalion 16th Field
Artillery in Figure 2-22 is an example of a priority target. (See FM 3-09 for
additional information regarding fire support.)
2-32
______________________________________ Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
Obstacle Zones
2-33
FM 3-90__________________________________________________________________________________
are allowed to employ tactical obstacles (JP 1-02). Corps and division
commanders use them to grant obstacle-emplacement authority to brigades
(including armored cavalry regiments and other major subordinate units).
Obstacle zones are permissive, allowing brigades to place reinforcing obsta-
cles to support their scheme of maneuver without interfering with future op-
erations.
EM P LAC EM ENT
O BS TA C LE AU TH OR ITY
C O N T RO L G RA P H IC E XA M PL E
M EA SUR E FR O M TO
CORPS D IV Le tter A
De sign ation 2
ZONE
D IV BDE Effect G ra ph ic
O ption al
3
CORPS BDE 1 1
Nu m b er
De sign ation
B EL T D IV BDE 1
BDE TF
Effect Gra ph ic
No rm a l
1
CO E ffect Sy m bol is
TF TR P the G raphic
A B
O BST ACL E
RE STR ICTE D 52 ID
AR EA ANY 12 0900-
16 2400SepXX
(O R A )
G raphic
E ffects
Sym bols D isrupt Fix Turn Block
2-34
______________________________________ Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-105. If the obstacle zone encompasses the entire brigade AO, another
graphic is unnecessary. Commanders may designate the entire AO as an ob-
stacle zone, with the unit boundaries defining the geographical limits of the
zone. Obstacle zones do not cross brigade boundaries. Commanders assign ob-
stacle zones to a single subordinate unit to ensure unity of effort, just as they
would when assigning defensive AOs or battle positions. This keeps tactical
obstacle responsibility along the same lines as control of direct and indirect
fires. This does not normally create vulnerabilities on the boundary between
units since the commander bases his assignment of both subordinate AOs and
obstacle zones on defined avenues of approach.
2-106. A commander does not normally assign an obstacle effect (block, fix,
turn, or disrupt) to an obstacle zone. This allows his subordinate commanders
flexibility in using obstacles. The commander should establish construction
and resourcing priorities between different obstacle zones.
Obstacle Belts
2-107. An obstacle belt is a brigade-level command and control measure,
normally given graphically, to show where within an obstacle zone the
ground tactical commander plans to limit friendly obstacle employment and
focus the defense (JP 1-02). It assigns an intent to the obstacle plan and
provides the necessary guidance on the overall effect of obstacles within a
belt. They plan obstacle belts within assigned obstacle zones to grant
obstacle-emplacement authority to their major subordinate units. Obstacle
belts also focus obstacles to support the brigade scheme of maneuver and
ensure that obstacles do not interfere with the maneuver of any higher
headquarters.
2-108. Obstacle belts are restrictive, but also direct a subordinate unit to con-
struct one or more obstacles to achieve an effect in the area. They do not spe-
cify the type or number of obstacles. Obstacle belts do not cross unit bound-
aries for the same reasons as discussed in obstacle zones. A single unit is re-
sponsible for a belt; however, a commander may assign more than one belt to
a unit.
2-109. A brigade commander normally assigns an obstacle effect and priority
to each obstacle belt. As with the obstacle zone, the target and relative loca-
tion are apparent. Adding a specific obstacle effect gives purpose and direc-
tion to battalion task force obstacle planning. When brigade commanders
assign an obstacle effect, they ensure that obstacles within the belt comple-
ment the brigade fire plan.
2-110. A corps, division, or brigade commander may authorize emplacement
authority for certain types of protective obstacles outside of obstacle zones or
belts. Normally, the commander authorizes company team and base com-
manders to emplace protective obstacles within 500 meters of their positions,
depending on the factors of METT-TC. The commander usually limits the
types of obstacles a unit may use for protective obstacles that are outside of
obstacle-control measures. For example, he may allow only wire- and
command-detonated mines outside of control measures for protective obsta-
cles. Furthermore, he may require that minefields be fenced on all sides to
2-35
FM 3-90__________________________________________________________________________________
Obstacle Groups
2-111. Obstacle groups are one or more individual obstacles grouped
to provide a specific obstacle effect. Task forces use obstacle groups to
ensure that company teams emplace individual obstacles supporting the task
force’s scheme of maneuver. In rare cases, brigades, divisions, or even corps
may use obstacle groups for specific tactical obstacles. Also, units integrate
obstacle groups with their direct- and indirect-fire plans. Brigade and task
force commanders can plan their placement anywhere in the obstacle zones
or belts, respectively.
2-112. Unlike obstacle zones or belts, obstacle groups are not areas but rela-
tive locations for actual obstacles. Commanders normally show obstacle
groups using the obstacle-effect graphics. When detailed planning is possible
(to include detailed on-the-ground reconnaissance), commanders may show
obstacle groups using individual obstacle graphics.
2-113. The company team commander and the engineer can adjust obstacles
in the group if the intent and link to the fire plan remain intact. Company
team commanders make minor changes to obstacles and fire-control meas-
ures based on terrain realities. For example, a commander may move a fixing
obstacle group and direct-fire TRPs a hundred meters to avoid having them
masked by rolling terrain. A major change to the obstacle group location re-
quires the approval of the commander who ordered the obstacle group em-
placement.
Individual Obstacles
2-114. Each type of individual obstacle, such as abatis, antitank ditch, booby
traps, mines and minefields, roadblocks, craters, and wire obstacles has its
associated graphic. Once a unit constructs an individual obstacle, the ob-
stacle’s location is recorded and reported through the chain of command.
Commanders must report individual obstacles in sufficient detail so any unit
moving through the area can bypass or reduce the obstacle without excessive
risk. Each headquarters is responsible to ensure exact obstacle locations are
disseminated throughout its organization. Individual obstacle graphics are
rarely shown on maps above the battalion echelon and are not depicted in
this manual. (FM 3-34.1 defines individual obstacles and establishes the
graphics for them.)
Obstacle Restrictions
2-115. Commanders may use obstacle restrictions to provide additional obsta-
cle control and to limit the specific types of obstacles used, such as no buried
mines. These restrictions ensure that subordinates do not use obstacles with
characteristics that impair future operations. It also allows commanders to
focus the use of limited resources for the decisive operation by restricting
their use elsewhere. An obstacle restricted area (ORA) is a command and
control measure used to limit the type or number of obstacles within an area
(JP 1-02). The commander with emplacement authority uses ORAs to restrict
2-36
______________________________________ Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
obstacle placement. The ORA graphic depicts the area effected, the unit
imposing the restriction, and the restrictions in effect.
PHASE LINE
2-116. A phase line (PL) is a line utilized for control and coordination of mili-
tary operations, usually a terrain feature extending across the operational
area [JP 1-02 uses zone of action] (JP 1-02). (See Figure 2-27.) A commander
establishes PLs to control the maneuver of his units. Phase lines are not
boundaries unless designated as such and do not establish any specific
responsibilities between units, unless the operations order so specifies. When
possible, the commander places them along easily recognizable terrain
features—such as roads, railroad tracks, rivers, and ridgelines—to ensure
easy identification. As with boundaries, this is less important if all units are
equipped with precision navigation devices. Some PLs have additional
designations for specific purposes, such as a LD or a probable line of
deployment (PLD). Chapter 5 discusses these specific purposes.
PL ROBERT
PL RON
X
PL JOHN
PL BASIL
LD/LC
OBJ OBJ
ATTACK ZEKE PAT
PSN OBJ
KAI
(LIMIT OF ADVANCE)
GOLD
TF 2-58
II
TF 3-67
ATTACK
PSN
ASLT
BLUE AXIS PSN
PL JOHN
PL BASIL
PL ROBERT
JAN
LD/LC
PEGGY
PL RON
2-37
FM 3-90__________________________________________________________________________________
ROUTE
2-120. A route is the pre- 071800ZJUL00 19 RP 3
scribed course to be traveled
from a specific point of TCP 8
origin to a specific destina-
tion (JP 1-02). (See Route 50 80
40 50
Iron in Figure 2-29.) Routes 071600ZJUL00 13 A2
A2
20m
RU
IR 52
ed as adjectives to specify E 23
U
T
XX
RO
U AD MD
20 23 O
different types of routes. Ex- R
XX
ID AD
amples of such routes in- SP 7
LL 23
clude passing route and XX
JTF
main supply route (MSR). AA RAMONA
2-38
______________________________________ Common Tactical Concepts and Graphic Control Measures
2-39









