IWAS WHEELCHAIR FENCING

RULES FOR COMPETITION

BOOK 4: CLASSIFICATION RULES

Version: February 2018
Organisation
Organisation .......................................................................................................................... 5
Part One: General Provisions .............................................................................................. 5
Scope and Application................................................................................................ 5
Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................. 6
Part Two: Classification Personnel ...................................................................................... 8
Classification Personnel ................................................................................................ 8
Classifier Competencies, Training and Certification ............................................... 9
Classifier Code of Conduct ....................................................................................... 11
Part Three: Athlete Evaluation .......................................................................................... 12
General Provisions ....................................................................................................... 12
Eligible Impairment ..................................................................................................... 12
Minimum Impairment Criteria ................................................................................... 14
Sport Class .................................................................................................................... 15
Classification Not Completed ................................................................................ 16
Part Four: Athlete Evaluation and the Classification Panel ......................................... 17
The Classification Panel ........................................................................................... 17
Classification Panel Responsibilities ....................................................................... 17
Evaluation Sessions ................................................................................................... 18
Observation in Competition ................................................................................... 19
Sport Class Status ...................................................................................................... 20
Notification ................................................................................................................ 22
Part Five: Sport Class Not Eligible ..................................................................................... 23
Sport Class Not Eligible ............................................................................................ 23
Part Six: Protests ................................................................................................................... 25
18 Scope of a Protest .................................................................................................... 25
19 Parties Permitted to Make a Protest ...................................................................... 25
20 National Protests ....................................................................................................... 25
21 National Protest Procedure .................................................................................... 25
22 Protests ....................................................................................................................... 26
23 Protest Procedure ..................................................................................................... 27
24 Protest Panel ............................................................................................................. 27
25 Provisions Where No Protest Panel is Available ................................................... 28
26 Special Provisions...................................................................................................... 28

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 2
27 Ad Hoc Provisions Relating to Protests .................................................................. 28
Part Seven: Misconduct during Evaluation Session ....................................................... 29
Failure to Attend Evaluation Session ..................................................................... 29
Suspension of Evaluation Session ........................................................................... 29
Part Eight: Medical Review ............................................................................................... 31
Medical Review ........................................................................................................ 31
Part Nine: Intentional Misrepresentation ......................................................................... 32
Intentional Misrepresentation ................................................................................. 32
Part Ten: Use of Athlete Information ................................................................................ 34
32 Classification Data ................................................................................................... 34
33 Consent and Processing ......................................................................................... 34
34 Classification Research ........................................................................................... 34
35 Notification to Athletes ............................................................................................ 34
36 Classification Data Security .................................................................................... 35
37 Disclosures of Classification Data .......................................................................... 35
38 Retaining Classification Data ................................................................................. 35
39 Access Rights to Classification Data ..................................................................... 36
Classification Master Lists ........................................................................................ 36
Part Eleven: Appeals .......................................................................................................... 36
41 Appeal ....................................................................................................................... 36
42 Parties Permitted to Make an Appeal .................................................................. 36
43 Appeals ...................................................................................................................... 36
44 Ad Hoc Provisions Relating to Appeals ................................................................. 37
Part Twelve: Glossary ......................................................................................................... 37
Appendix One .................................................................................................................... 43
Athletes with Physical Impairment ................................................................................... 43
1 Eligible Impairment Types .......................................................................................... 43
1.1 Eligible Impairment Types………………………………………………………………….43
1.2 Non eligible Impairment Types……………………………………………………………44
2 Minimum Impairment Criteria……………………………………………………………….45
2.1 Limb Deficiency……………………………………………………………………………..45
2.2 Impaired Muscle Power……………………………………………………………………45
2.3 Impaired Passive Range of Movement…………………………………………………45
2.4 Hypertonia……………………………………………………………………………………45
2.5 Ataxia…………………………………………………………………………………………46

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 3
2.6 Athetosis………………………………………………………………………………………46
3 Methods of Assessment………………………………………………………………………47
3.1 Assessments regulating the use of Adaptive Equipment……………………………47
3.2 Assessment of the Muscle Power in the Fencing Arm……………………………….48
3.3 Observation in Competition………………………………………………………….…..48
3.4 Table 1: Bench Test for Upper and Lower Limbs………………………………………49
3.5 Table 2: Bench Test for Trunk and Functional Tests…………………………………..50
3.6 Point Score for Bench Tests………………………………………………………………..50
3.7 Point Score for Function Tests……………………………………………………………..51
4 Sport Class and the Designation of Sports Class Status………………………………..54
4.1 Class 1A……………………………………………………………………………………….54
4.2 Class 1B……………………………………………………………………………………….54
4.3 Class 2…………………………………………………………………………………………54
4.4 Class 3…………………………………………………………………………………………55
4.5 Class 4…………………………………………………………………………………………55
Appendix Two……………………………………………………………………………………56
1 Non Eligible Impairment types for all Athletes…………………………………………..56
2 Health Conditions that are not Underlying Health conditions for all Athletes…….56

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 4
Part One: General Provisions
Scope and Application
Adoption
1.1 These Classification Rules and Regulations are referred to throughout this
document as the ‘Classification Rules’. They have been prepared by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing to implement the requirements of the 2015 IPC Athlete
Classification Code and International Standards.
1.2 The Classification Rules have been adopted by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing on
[date].
1.3 These Classification Rules refer to a number of Appendices. These
Appendices form an integral part of the Classification Rules.
1.4 These Classification Rules form part of the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Rules
and Regulations.
1.5 The Classification Rules are supplemented by a number of Classification
forms that have been prepared to assist Athlete Evaluation. These forms are
available from IWAS Wheelchair Fencing, and can be amended by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing from time to time.
Classification
1.6 Classification is undertaken to:
a) define who is eligible to compete in IWAS Wheelchair Fencing and
consequently who has the opportunity to reach the goal of becoming
a Paralympic Athlete; and
b) group Athletes into Sport Classes which aim to ensure that the impact
of Impairment is minimised and sporting excellence determines which
Athlete or team is ultimately victorious.

Application
1.7 These Classification Rules apply to all Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel
who are registered and/or licensed with IWAS Wheelchair Fencing, and/or
participate in any Events or Competitions organised, authorised or
recognised by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
1.8 These Classification Rules must be read and applied in conjunction with all
other applicable rules of IWAS Wheelchair Fencing, including but not limited
to the Technical Rules, the Material Rules and the Organisational Rules of
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing. In the event of any conflict between these
Classification Rules and any other rules, the Classification Rules shall take
precedence.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 5
International Classification
1.9 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing will only permit an Athlete to compete in an
International Competition if that Athlete has been allocated a Sport Class
(other than Sport Class Not Eligible) and designated with a Sport Class Status
in accordance with these Classification Rules.
1.10 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing will provide opportunities for Athletes to be
allocated a Sport Class and designated with a Sport Class Status in
accordance with these Classification Rules at Recognised Competitions (or
other such locations as defined by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing). IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing will advise Athletes, National Bodies and National
Paralympic Committees in advance as to such Recognised Competitions (or
other such locations).
Interpretation and Relationship to Code
1.11 References to an ‘Article’ mean an Article of these Classification Rules,
references to an ‘Appendix’ mean an Appendix to these Classification
Rules, and Capitalised terms used in these Classification Rules have the
meaning given to them in the Glossary to these Classification Rules.
1.12 References to a ‘sport’ in these Classification Rules refer to both a sport and
an individual discipline within a sport for example Men’s Epee, Women’s Foil
etc.
1.13 The Appendices to these Classification Rules are part of these Classification
Rules both of which may be amended, supplemented and/or replaced by
the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing from time to time.
1.14 Headings used in these Classification Rules are used for convenience only
and have no meaning that is separate from the Article or Articles to which
they refer.
1.15 These Classification Rules are to be applied and interpreted as an
independent text but in a manner, that is consistent with the 2015 IPC Athlete
Classification Code and the accompanying International Standards.

Roles and Responsibilities

2.1 It is the personal responsibility of Athletes, Athlete Support Personnel, and
Classification Personnel to familiarise themselves with all the requirements of
these Classification Rules.
Athlete Responsibilities
2.2 The roles and responsibilities of Athletes include to:
c) be knowledgeable of and comply with all applicable policies, rules and
processes established by these Classification Rules;
d) participate in Athlete Evaluation in good faith;

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 6
 e) ensure when appropriate that adequate information related to Health
Conditions and Eligible Impairments is provided and/or made available
to IWAS Wheelchair Fencing;
f) cooperate with any investigations concerning violations of these
Classification Rules; and
g) actively participate in the process of education and awareness, and
Classification research, through exchanging personal experiences and
expertise.

Athlete Support Personnel Responsibilities

2.3 The roles and responsibilities of Athlete Support Personnel include to:
a) be knowledgeable of and comply with all applicable policies, rules and
processes established by these Classification Rules;
b) use their influence on Athlete values and behaviour to foster a positive
and collaborative Classification attitude and communication;
c) assist in the development, management and implementation of
Classification Systems; and
d) cooperate with any investigations concerning violations of these
Classification Rules.

Classification Personnel Responsibilities

2.4 The roles and responsibilities of Classification Personnel include to:
a) have a complete working knowledge of all applicable policies, rules
and processes established by these Classification Rules;
b) use their influence to foster a positive and collaborative Classification
attitude and communication;
c) assist in the development, management and implementation of
Classification Systems, including participation in education and
research; and
d) cooperate with any investigations concerning violations of these
Classification Rules.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 7
Part Two: Classification Personnel
Classification Personnel
3.1 Classification Personnel are fundamental to the effective implementation of
these Classification Rules. IWAS Wheelchair Fencing will appoint a number
of Classification Personnel, each of whom will have a key role in the
organisation, implementation and administration of Classification for the
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
Head of Classification
3.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must appoint a Head of Classification. The Head
of Classification is a person responsible for the direction, administration, co-
ordination and implementation of Classification matters for IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing.
3.3 If a Head of Classification cannot be appointed, IWAS Wheelchair Fencing
may appoint another person, or group of persons collectively (provided
such person or group of persons agrees to comply with the Classifier Code
of Conduct), to act as the Head of Classification.
3.4 The Head of Classification is not required to be a certified Classifier.
3.5 The Head of Classification may delegate specific responsibilities and/or the
transfer specific tasks to designated Classifiers, or other persons authorised
by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
3.6 Nothing in these Classification Rules prevents the Head of Classification (if
certified as a Classifier) from also being appointed as a Classifier and/or
Chief Classifier.
Classifiers
3.7 A Classifier is a person authorised as an official and certified by the IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing to conduct some or all components of Athlete
Evaluation as a member of a Classification Panel.
Chief Classifiers
3.8 A Chief Classifier is a Classifier appointed to direct, administer, co-ordinate
and implement Classification matters for a specific Competition or at such
other location as defined by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing. In particular, a Chief
Classifier may be required by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to do the following:
3.8.1 identify those Athletes who will be required to attend an Evaluation
Session;
3.8.2 supervise Classifiers to ensure that these Classification Rules are properly
applied during Classification;
3.8.3 manage Protests in consultation with IWAS Wheelchair Fencing; and
3.8.4 liaise with the relevant Competition organisers to ensure that all travel,
accommodation and other logistics are arranged in order that
Classifiers may carry out their duties at the Competition.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 8
3.9 A Chief Classifier may delegate specific responsibilities and/or transfer
specific tasks to other appropriately qualified Classifiers, or other
appropriately qualified IWAS Wheelchair Fencing officers or representatives,
and/or appropriately qualified persons in the local organising committee of
a Competition.
Trainee Classifiers
3.10 A Trainee Classifier is a person who is in the process of formal training by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing.
3.11 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may appoint Trainee Classifiers to participate in
some or all components of Athlete Evaluation under the supervision of a
Classification Panel, to develop Classifier Competencies.

Classifier Competencies, Training and Certification

4.1 A Classifier will be authorised to act as a Classifier if that Classifier has been
certified by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing as having the relevant Classifier
Competencies.
4.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must provide training and education to Classifiers
to ensure Classifiers obtain and/or maintain Classifier Competencies.
4.3 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must specify and publish Classifier Competencies
in a manner that is transparent and accessible. The Classifier Competencies
must include that a Classifier has:
4.3.1 a thorough understanding of these Classification Rules;
4.3.2 an understanding of the sport(s) for which they seek certification to act
as a Classifier, including an understanding of the technical rules of the
sport(s);
4.3.3 an understanding of the Code and the International Standards; and
4.3.4 a professional qualification(s), level of experience, skills and/or
competencies in order to act as a Classifier for IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing. These include that Classifiers must either:
a) be a certified health professional in a field relevant to the Eligible
Impairment category which IWAS Wheelchair Fencing at its sole
discretion deems acceptable, such as a physician or physiotherapist
for Athletes with a Physical Impairment; or

b) have an extensive coaching or other relevant background in the

particular sport(s); or a recognised and reputable academic
qualification which encompasses a requisite level of anatomical,
biomechanical and sport-specific expertise, which IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing at its sole discretion deems to be acceptable.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 9
4.4 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must establish a process of Classifier Certification
by which Classifier Competencies are assessed. This process must include:
4.4.1 a process for the certification of Trainee Classifiers;
4.4.2 quality assessment for the period of certification;
4.4.3 a process for handling substandard performance, including options for
remediation and/or withdrawal of certification; and
4.4.4 a process for Re-certification of Classifiers.
4.5 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must specify Entry-Level Criteria applicable to
persons who wish to become Trainee Classifiers. IWAS Wheelchair Fencing
will provide Entry-Level Education to Trainee Classifiers.
4.6 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must provide Continuing Education to Classifiers
for the purposes of Certification and Re-certification.
4.7 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may provide that a Classifier is subject to certain
limitations, including (but not limited to):
4.7.1 a limitation on the Impairment type for which a Classifier is certified to
act as a Classifier;
4.7.2 a limitation on the components of Athlete Evaluation that a Classifier is
certified to conduct;
4.7.3 a limitation on the level of Competition or Event that a Classifier is
authorised to act as a Classifier;
4.7.4 the maximum time that a Classifier Certification is valid;
4.7.5 that Classifier Certification is subject to review within a specific time
frame by reference to the Classifier Competencies;
4.7.6 that a Classifier may lose Classifier Certification if IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing is not satisfied that the Classifier possesses the required Classifier
Competencies; and/or
4.7.7 that a Classifier may regain Classifier Certification if IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing is satisfied that the Classifier possesses the required Classifier
Competencies.
4.8 Further information regarding the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Classification
Certification Training Programme can be found here:
http://www.iwasf.com/iwasf/index.cfm/sports/iwas-wheelchair-
fencing/classification1/

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 10
 Classifier Code of Conduct
5.1 The integrity of Classification in IWAS Wheelchair Fencing depends on the
conduct of Classification Personnel. IWAS Wheelchair Fencing has therefore
adopted a set of professional conduct standards referred to as the ‘Classifier
Code of Conduct’.
5.2 All Classification Personnel must comply with the Classifier Code of Conduct.
5.3 Any person who believes that any Classification Personnel may have acted
in a manner that contravenes the Classifier Code of Conduct must report
this to IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
5.4 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing receives such a report it will investigate the
report and, if appropriate, take disciplinary measures.
5.5 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing has discretion to determine whether or not a
Classifier has an actual, perceived and/or potential conflict of interest.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 11
Part Three: Athlete Evaluation
General Provisions
6.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing has specified in these Classification Rules the
process, assessment criteria and methodology whereby Athletes will be
allocated a Sport Class and designated a Sport Class Status. This process is
referred to as Athlete Evaluation.
6.2 Athlete Evaluation encompasses a number of steps and these Classification
Rules therefore include provisions regarding:
6.2.1 an assessment of whether or not an Athlete has an Eligible Impairment
for the sport;
6.2.2 an assessment of whether an Athlete complies with Minimum
Impairment Criteria for the sport; and
6.2.3 the allocation of a Sport Class (and designation of a Sport Class Status)
depending on the extent to which an Athlete is able to execute the
specific tasks and activities fundamental to the sport.

Eligible Impairment
7.1 Any Athlete wishing to compete in a sport governed by IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing must have an Eligible Impairment and that Eligible Impairment must
be Permanent.
7.2 Appendices Appendix One, and Two of these Classification Rules specify
the Eligible Impairment(s) an Athlete must have in order to compete in a
sport governed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
7.3 Any Impairment that is not listed as an Eligible Impairment in Appendices
One or Two is referred to as a Non-Eligible Impairment. Appendix Two
includes examples of Non-Eligible Impairments.
Assessment of Eligible Impairment
7.4 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must determine if an Athlete has an Eligible
Impairment.
7.4.1 In order to be satisfied that an Athlete has an Eligible Impairment, IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing may require any Athlete to demonstrate that he or
she has an Underlying Health Condition. Appendix lists examples of
Health Conditions that are not Underlying Health Conditions.
7.4.2 The means by which IWAS Wheelchair Fencing determines that an
individual Athlete has an Eligible Impairment is at the sole discretion of
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing. IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may consider that
an Athlete’s Eligible Impairment is sufficiently obvious and therefore not
require evidence that demonstrates the Athlete’s Eligible Impairment.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 12
 7.4.3 If in the course of determining if an Athlete has an Eligible Impairment
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing becomes aware that the Athlete has a
Health Condition, and believes that the impact of that Health
Condition may be that it is unsafe for that Athlete to compete or there
is a risk to the health of the Athlete (or other Athletes) if that Athlete
competes, it may designate the Athlete as Classification Not
Completed (CNC) in accordance with Article 10 of these Classification
Rules. In such instances IWAS Wheelchair Fencing will explain the basis
of its designation to the relevant National Body and/or National
Paralympic Committee.
7.5 An Athlete must (if requested to do so) supply IWAS Wheelchair Fencing with
Diagnostic Information that must be provided as follows:
7.5.1 The relevant National Body and/or National Paralympic Committee
must submit a Medical Diagnostics Form to IWAS Wheelchair Fencing,
upon completing the registration of an Athlete.
7.5.2 The Medical Diagnostics Form must be completed in English and dated
and signed by a certified health care professional.
7.5.3 The Medical Diagnostic Form must be submitted with supportive
Diagnostic Information if required by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
7.6 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may require an Athlete to re-submit the Medical
Diagnostics Form (with necessary supportive Diagnostic Information) if the
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing at its sole discretion considers the Medical
Diagnostic Form and/or the Diagnostic Information to be incomplete or
inconsistent.
7.7 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing requires an Athlete to provide Diagnostic
Information it may consider the Diagnostic Information itself, and/or may
appoint an Eligibility Assessment Committee to do so.
7.8 The process by which an Eligibility Assessment Committee is formed and
considers Diagnostic Information is as follows:
7.8.1 The Head of Classification will notify the relevant National Body or
National Paralympic Committee that Diagnostic Information must be
provided on behalf of the Athlete. The Head of Classification will explain
what Diagnostic Information is required, and the purposes for which it is
required.
7.8.2 The Head of Classification will set timelines for the production of
Diagnostic Information.
7.8.3 The Head of Classification will appoint an Eligibility Assessment
Committee. The Eligibility Assessment Committee must, if practicable,
be comprised of the Head of Classification and at least two other
experts with appropriate medical qualifications. All members of the
Eligibility Assessment Committee must sign confidentiality undertakings.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 13
 7.8.4 If the Head of Classification believes that he or she does not hold the
necessary competencies to assess the Diagnostic Information, he or she
will not participate in the review of the Diagnostic Information, but will
assist the Eligibility Assessment Committee.
7.8.5 Wherever possible all references to the individual Athlete and the
source(s) of the Diagnostic Information should be withheld from the
Eligibility Assessment Committee. Each member of the Eligibility
Assessment Committee will review the Diagnostic Information and
decide whether such information establishes the existence of an Eligible
Impairment.
7.8.6 If the Eligibility Assessment Committee concludes that the Athlete has
an Eligible Impairment the Athlete will be permitted to complete
Athlete Evaluation with a Classification Panel.
7.8.7 If the Eligibility Assessment Committee is not satisfied that the Athlete
has an Eligible Impairment the Head of Classification will provide a
decision to this effect in writing to the relevant National Body or
National Paralympic Committee. The National Body or National
Paralympic Committee will be given an opportunity to comment on the
decision and may provide further Diagnostic Information to the Eligibility
Assessment Committee for review. If the decision is subsequently
revised, the Head of Classification will inform the National Body or
National Paralympic Committee.
7.8.8 If the decision is not changed, the Head of Classification will issue a final
decision letter to the National Body or National Paralympic Committee.
7.8.9 The Eligibility Assessment Committee may make its decisions by a
majority. If the Head of Classification is part of the Eligibility Assessment
Committee, he or she may veto any decision if he or she does not agree
that the Diagnostic Information supports the conclusion that the Athlete
has an Eligible Impairment.
7.9 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may delegate one or more of the functions
described above to a Classification Panel.

Minimum Impairment Criteria

8.1 An Athlete who wishes to compete in a sport must have an Eligible
Impairment that complies with the relevant Minimum Impairment Criteria for
that sport.
8.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing has set Minimum Impairment Criteria to ensure
that an Athlete’s Eligible Impairment affects the extent to which an Athlete
is able to execute the specific tasks and activities fundamental to the sport.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 14
8.3 Appendix One, of these Classification Rules specify the Minimum
Impairment Criteria applicable to each sport and the process by which an
Athlete’s compliance with Minimum Impairment Criteria is to be assessed by
a Classification Panel as part of an Evaluation Session.
8.4 Any Athlete who does not comply with the Minimum Impairment Criteria for
a sport must be allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) for that sport.
8.5 A Classification Panel must assess whether or not an Athlete complies with
Minimum Impairment Criteria. This will take place as part of an Evaluation
Session. Prior to participating in an Evaluation Session, an Athlete must first
satisfy the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing that he or she has an Eligible
Impairment.
8.6 In relation to the use of Adaptive Equipment, IWAS Wheelchair Fencing has
set Minimum Impairment Criteria as follows:
8.6.1 for Eligible Impairments the Minimum Impairment Criteria must not
consider the extent to which the use of Adaptive Equipment might
affect how the Athlete is able to execute the specific tasks and
activities fundamental to the sport;

Sport Class
9.1 A Sport Class is a category defined by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing in these
Classification Rules, in which Athletes are grouped by reference to the
impact of an Eligible Impairment on their ability to execute the specific tasks
and activities fundamental to a sport.
9.1.1 An Athlete who does not have an Eligible Impairment or does not
comply with the Minimum Impairment Criteria for a sport must be
allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) for that sport in accordance with
the provisions of Article 17 of these Classification Rules.
9.1.2 An Athlete who complies with the Minimum Impairment Criteria for a
sport must be allocated a Sport Class (subject to the provisions in these
Classification Rules concerning Failure to Attend Athlete Evaluation and
Suspension of Athlete Evaluation).
9.1.3 Except for the allocation of Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing (in accordance with Article 17.1), the allocation of
a Sport Class must be based solely on an evaluation by a Classification
Panel of the extent to which the Athlete’s Eligible Impairment affects
the specific tasks and activities fundamental to sport. This evaluation
must take place in a controlled non-competitive environment, which
allows for the repeated observation of key tasks and activities.
9.2 Appendix One, of these Classification Rules specify the assessment
methodology and assessment criteria for the allocation of a Sport Class and
the designation of Sport Class Status.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 15
 Classification Not Completed
10.1 If at any stage of Athlete Evaluation IWAS Wheelchair Fencing or a
Classification Panel is unable to allocate a Sport Class to an Athlete, the
Head of Classification or the relevant Chief Classifier may designate that
Athlete as Classification Not Completed (CNC).
10.2 The designation Classification Not Completed (CNC) is not a Sport Class and
is not subject to the provisions in these Classification Rules concerning
Protests. The designation Classification Not Completed (CNC) will however
be recorded for the purpose of the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Classification
Master List.
10.3 An Athlete who is designated as Classification Not Completed (CNC) may
not compete in the sport of IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 16
Part Four: Athlete Evaluation and the Classification Panel
The Classification Panel
11.1 A Classification Panel is a group of Classifiers appointed by IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing to conduct some or all of the components of Athlete Evaluation
including as part of an Evaluation Session.
General Provisions
11.2 A Classification Panel must be comprised of at least of two certified
Classifiers. In exceptional circumstances a Chief Classifier may provide that
a Classification Panel comprise only one Classifier, subject to that Classifier
holding a valid medical qualification.
11.3 A Trainee Classifier may be part of a Classification Panel in addition to the
required number of certified Classifiers, and may participate in Athlete
Evaluation.

Classification Panel Responsibilities

12.1 A Classification Panel is responsible for conducting an Evaluation Session. As
part of the Evaluation Session the Classification Panel must:
12.1.1 assess whether an Athlete complies with Minimum Impairment Criteria
for the sport;
12.1.2 assess the extent to which an Athlete is able to execute the specific
tasks and activities fundamental to the sport; and
12.1.3 conduct (if required) Observation in Competition.
12.2 Following the Evaluation Session, the Classification Panel must allocate a
Sport Class and designate a Sport Class Status, or designate Classification
Not Completed (CNC).
12.3 Prior to the Evaluation Session, the assessment as to whether an Athlete has
an Eligible Impairment must be undertaken by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing,
unless IWAS Wheelchair Fencing requests this to be undertaken by a
Classification Panel.
12.4 The Evaluation Session must take place in a controlled non-competitive
environment that allows for the repeated observation of key tasks and
activities.

12.4.1 Although other factors such as low fitness level, poor technical
proficiency and aging may also affect the fundamental tasks and
activities of the sport, the allocation of Sport Class must not be affected
by these factors.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 17
12.5 An Athlete who has a Non-Eligible Impairment and an Eligible Impairment
may be evaluated by a Classification Panel on the basis of the Eligible
Impairment, provided the Non-Eligible Impairment does not affect the
Classification Panel’s ability to allocate a Sport Class.
12.6 The Sport Class allocated to the Athlete will be in accordance with the
processes specified in Appendix One.

Evaluation Sessions
13.1 This Article applies to all Evaluation Sessions.
13.2 The Athlete’s National Body or National Paralympic Committee is
responsible for ensuring that Athletes comply with their duties in relation to
the provisions in this Article.
13.3 In respect of Athletes:
13.3.1 Athletes have the right to be accompanied by a member of the
Athlete’s National Body or National Paralympic Committee when
attending an Evaluation Session. The Athlete must be accompanied if
the Athlete is a minor or has an Intellectual Impairment.
13.3.2 The person chosen by the Athlete to accompany the Athlete at an
Evaluation Session should be familiar with the Athlete’s Impairment and
sport history.
13.3.3 The Athlete and accompanying person must acknowledge the terms
of the Athlete Evaluation Agreement Form as specified by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing.
13.3.4 The Athlete must verify his or her identity to the satisfaction of the
Classification Panel, by providing a document such as a passport, ID
card, IWAS Wheelchair Fencing license card or event accreditation.
13.3.5 The Athlete must attend the Evaluation Session with any sports attire or
equipment relevant to the sport for which the Athlete wishes to be
allocated a Sport Class.
13.3.6 The Athlete must disclose the use of any medication and/or medical
device/implant to the Classification Panel.
13.3.7 The Athlete must comply with all reasonable instructions given by a
Classification Panel.
13.4 In respect of the Classification Panel:
13.4.1 The Classification Panel may request that an Athlete provide medical
documentation relevant to the Athlete’s Eligible Impairment if the
Classification Panel believes that this will be necessary in order for it to
allocate a Sport Class.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 18
 13.4.2 The Classification Panel will conduct Evaluation Sessions in English unless
otherwise stipulated by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing. If the Athlete requires
an interpreter, a member of the Athlete’s National Body or National
Paralympic Committee will be responsible for arranging for an
interpreter. The interpreter is permitted to attend the Evaluation Session
in addition to the person referred to in Article 13.3.1 above.
13.4.3 The Classification Panel may at any stage seek medical, technical or
scientific opinion(s), with the agreement of the Head of Classification
and/or a Chief Classifier if the Classification Panel feels that such
opinion(s) is necessary in order to allocate a Sport Class.
13.4.4 In addition to any opinion(s) sought in accordance with Article 13.4.3,
a Classification Panel may only have regard to evidence supplied to it
by the relevant Athlete, National Body, National Paralympic
Committee and IWAS Wheelchair Fencing (from any source) when
allocating a Sport Class.
13.4.5 The Classification Panel may make, create or use video footage and/or
other records to assist it when allocating a Sport Class.

Observation in Competition
14.1 A Classification Panel may require that an Athlete undertake Observation in
Competition Assessment before it allocates a final Sport Class and
designates a Sport Class Status to that Athlete.
14.2 The methods by which Observation in Competition Assessment may be
undertaken, and the matters to be observed, are set out in Appendix One
14.3 If a Classification Panel requires an Athlete to complete Observation in
Competition Assessment, the Athlete will be entered in the Competition with
the Sport Class allocated by the Classification Panel after the conclusion of
the initial components of the Evaluation Session.
14.4 An Athlete who is required to complete Observation in Competition
Assessment will be designated with Tracking Code: Observation Assessment
(OA). This replaces the Athlete’s Sport Class Status for the duration of
Observation in Competition Assessment.
14.5 Observation in Competition Assessment must take place during First
Appearance. In this regard:
14.5.1 First Appearance is the first time an Athlete competes in an Event during
a Competition in a particular Sport Class.
14.5.2 First Appearance within a Sport Class applies to participation in all
Events within the same Sport Class.
14.5.3 An Athlete who competes in a Team Sport must make First Appearance
during the preliminary rounds of a Competition. First Appearance must
not take place in the elimination rounds of a Competition.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 19
14.6 If an Athlete is:
a) subject to a Protest following Observation in Competition; and
b) the second Evaluation Session is conducted at that same
Competition; and
c) pursuant to the second Evaluation Session the Athlete is required to
undergo Observation in Competition,
Observation in Competition must take place at the next opportunity
within the Sport Class allocated to the Athlete by the Protest Panel with
Tracking Code Observation Assessment (OA).
14.6.1 The Classification Panel must allocate a Sport Class and replace the
Athlete’s Tracking Code Observation Assessment (OA) by designating
a Sport Class Status upon completion of First Appearance (or
completion of any Observation in Competition conducted as part of a
Protest). If changes to an Athlete’s Sport Class or Sport Class Status are
made following Observation in Competition, the changes are effective
immediately.
14.7 The impact of an Athlete changing Sport Class after First Appearance on
medals, records and results is detailed in the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Rules
and Regulations.

Sport Class Status

15.1 If a Classification Panel allocates a Sport Class to an Athlete, it must also
designate a Sport Class Status. Sport Class Status indicates whether or not an
Athlete will be required to undertake Athlete Evaluation in the future; and if
the Athlete’s Sport Class may be subject to Protest.
15.2 The Sport Class Status designated to an Athlete by a Classification Panel at
the conclusion of an Evaluation Session will be one of the following:
 Confirmed (C)
 Review (R)
 Review with a Fixed Review Date (FRD)
Sport Class Status New
15.3 An Athlete is allocated Sport Class Status New (N) by IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing prior to attending the Athlete’s first Evaluation Session. An Athlete
with Sport Class Status New (N) must attend an Evaluation Session prior to
competing at any International Competition, unless IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing specifies otherwise.
Sport Class Status Confirmed
15.4 An Athlete will be designated with Sport Class Status Confirmed (C) if the
Classification Panel is satisfied that both the Athlete’s Eligible Impairment
and the Athlete’s ability to execute the specific tasks and activities
fundamental to the sport are and will remain stable

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 20
 15.4.1 An Athlete with Sport Class Status Confirmed (C) is not required to
undergo any further Athlete Evaluation (save pursuant to the provisions
in these Classification Rules concerning Protests (Article 18), Medical
Review (Article 30) and changes to Sport Class criteria (Article 15.7)).
15.4.2 A Classification Panel that consists of only one Classifier may not
designate an Athlete with Sport Class Status Confirmed (C) but must
designate the Athlete with Sport Class Status Review (R).

Sport Class Status Review

15.5 An Athlete will be designated Sport Class Status Review (R) if the
Classification Panel believes that further Evaluation Sessions will be required.
15.5.1 A Classification Panel may base its belief that further Evaluation Sessions
will be required based on a number of factors, including but not limited
to situations where the Athlete has only recently entered Competitions
sanctioned or recognised by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing; has a
fluctuating and/or progressive Impairment/Impairments that is/are
permanent but not stable; and/or has not yet reached full muscular
skeletal or sports maturity.
15.5.2 An Athlete with Sport Class Status Review (R) must complete Athlete
Evaluation prior to competing at any subsequent International
Competition, unless IWAS Wheelchair Fencing specifies otherwise.
Sport Class Status Review with Fixed Review Date
15.6 An Athlete may be designated Sport Class Status Review with a Fixed Review
Date (FRD) if the Classification Panel believes that further Athlete Evaluation
will be required but will not be necessary before a set date, being the Fixed
Review Date.
15.6.1 An Athlete with Sport Class Status Review with a Fixed Review Date
(FRD) will be required to attend an Evaluation Session at the first
opportunity after the relevant Fixed Review Date.
15.6.2 An Athlete who has been allocated Sport Class Status Review with a
Fixed Review Date (FRD) may not attend an Evaluation Session prior to
the relevant Fixed Review Date save pursuant to a Medical Review
Request and/or Protest.
15.6.3 A Classification Panel that consists of only one Classifier may not
designate an Athlete with Sport Class Status Review with a Fixed Review
Date (FRD) but must designate the Athlete with Sport Class Status
Review (R).
Changes to Sport Class Criteria
15.7 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing changes any Sport Class criteria and/ or
assessment methods defined in the Appendices to these Rules, then:

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 21
 15.7.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may re-assign any Athlete who holds Sport
Class Status Confirmed (C) with Sport Class Status Review (R) and
require that the Athlete attend an Evaluation Session at the earliest
available opportunity; or
15.7.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may remove the Fixed Review Date for any
Athlete and require that the Athlete attend an Evaluation Session at the
earliest available opportunity; and
15.7.3 in both instances the relevant National Body or National Paralympic
Committee shall be informed as soon as is practicable.

Notification
16.1 The outcome of Athlete Evaluation must be notified to the Athlete and/or
National Body or National Paralympic Committee and published as soon as
practically possible after completion of Athlete Evaluation.
16.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must publish the outcome of Athlete Evaluation at
the Competition following Athlete Evaluation, and the outcomes must be
made available post Competition via the Classification Master List at IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing website.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 22
Part Five: Sport Class Not Eligible
Sport Class Not Eligible
General Provisions
17.1 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing determines that an Athlete:
17.1.1 has an Impairment that is not an Eligible Impairment; or
17.1.2 does not have an Underlying Health Condition,
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must allocate that Athlete Sport Class Not Eligible
(NE).
17.2 If a Classification Panel determines that an Athlete who has an Eligible
Impairment does not comply with Minimum Impairment Criteria for a sport
that Athlete must be allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) for that sport.
Absence of Eligible Impairment
17.3 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing determines that an Athlete does not have an
Eligible Impairment, that Athlete:
17.3.1 will not be permitted to attend an Evaluation Session; and
17.3.2 will be allocated with Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) and designated with
Sport Class Status Confirmed (C) by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
17.4 If another International Sport Federation has allocated an Athlete with Sport
Class Not Eligible (NE) because the Athlete does not have an Eligible
Impairment IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may likewise do so without the need
for the process detailed in Article 7 of these Classification Rules.
17.5 An Athlete who is allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) by IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing or a Classification Panel (if delegated by [IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing]) because that Athlete has
17.5.1 an Impairment that is not an Eligible Impairment; or
17.5.2 a Health Condition that is not an Underlying Health Condition;
has no right to request such determination be reviewed by a second Classification
Panel and will not be permitted to participate in any sport.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 23
 Absence of Compliance with Minimum Impairment Criteria
17.6 A second Classification Panel must review by way of a second Evaluation
Session any Athlete who is allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) on the basis
that a Classification Panel determines that the Athlete does not comply with
Minimum Impairment Criteria. This must take place as soon as is practicable.
17.6.1 Pending the second Evaluation Session the Athlete will be allocated Sport
Class Not Eligible (NE) and designated Sport Class Status Review (R). The
Athlete will not be permitted to compete before such re-assessment.
17.6.2 If the second Classification Panel determines the Athlete does not comply
with Minimum Impairment Criteria (or if the Athlete declines to participate in
a second Evaluation Session at the time set by the Chief Classifier); Sport
Class Not Eligible (NE) will be allocated and the Athlete designated with
Sport Class Status Confirmed (C).
17.7 If an Athlete makes (or is subject to) a Protest on a previously allocated Sport
Class other than Not Eligible (NE) and is allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE)
by a Protest Panel, the Athlete must be provided with a further and final
Evaluation Session which will review the decision to allocate Sport Class Not
Eligible (NE) made by the Protest Panel.
17.8 If a Classification Panel allocates Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) on the basis
that it has determined that an Athlete does not comply with Minimum
Impairment Criteria for a sport the Athlete may be eligible to compete in
another sport, subject to Athlete Evaluation for that sport.
17.9 If an Athlete is allocated Sport Class Not Eligible (NE), this does not question
the presence of a genuine Impairment. It is only a ruling on the eligibility of
the Athlete to compete in the sport of IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 24
Part Six: Protests
Protests
18 Scope of a Protest
18.1 A Protest may only be made in respect of an Athlete’s Sport Class. A Protest
may not be made in respect of an Athlete’s Sport Class Status.
18.2 A Protest may not be made in respect of an Athlete who has been allocated
Sport Class Not Eligible (NE).

19 Parties Permitted to Make a Protest

A Protest may only be made by one of the following bodies:
19.1 a National Body (see Articles 20-21); or
19.2 a National Paralympic Committee (see Articles 20-21); or
19.3 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing (see Articles 22-23).

20 National Protests
20.1 A National Body or a National Paralympic Committee may only make a
Protest in respect of an Athlete under its jurisdiction at a Competition or
venue set aside for Athlete Evaluation.
20.2 If the outcome of Athlete Evaluation is published during a Competition
(pursuant to Article 16 of these Classification Rules) a National Protest must
be submitted within one (1) hour of that outcome being published. If the
outcome of Athlete Evaluation is published following Observation in
Competition a National Protest must be submitted within fifteen (15) minutes
of that outcome being published.
20.3 If an Athlete is required by a Classification Panel to undergo Observation in
Competition Assessment, a National Body or a National Paralympic
Committee may make a Protest before or after First Appearance takes
place. If a Protest is made before First Appearance takes place the Athlete
must not be permitted to compete until the Protest has been resolved.

21 National Protest Procedure

21.1 To submit a National Protest, a National Body or a National Paralympic
Committee must show that the Protest is bona fide with supporting evidence
and complete a Protest Form, that must be made available by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing at the Competition and via IWAS Wheelchair Fencing
website, and must include the following:
21.1.1 the name and sport of the Protested Athlete;

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 25
 21.1.2 the details of the Protested Decision and/or a copy of the Protested
Decision;
21.1.3 an explanation as to why the Protest has been made and the basis on
which the National Body or National Paralympic Committee believes
that the Protested Decision is flawed;
21.1.4 reference to the specific rule(s) alleged to have been breached; and
21.1.5 the Protest Fee set by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
21.2 The Protest Documents must be submitted to the Chief Classifier of the
relevant Competition within the time frames specified by IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing. Upon receipt of the Protest Documents the Chief Classifier must
conduct a review of the Protest, in consultation with IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing, of which there are two possible outcomes:
21.2.1 the Chief Classifier may dismiss the Protest if, in the discretion of the
Chief Classifier, the Protest does not comply with the Protest
requirements in this Article 21; or
21.2.2 the Chief Classifier may accept the Protest if, in the discretion of the
Chief Classifier, the Protest complies with the Protest requirements in this
Article 21.
21.3 If the Protest is dismissed the Chief Classifier must notify all relevant parties
and provide a written explanation to the National Body or National
Paralympic Committee as soon as practicable. The Protest Fee will be
forfeited.
21.4 If the Protest is accepted:
21.4.1 the Protested Athlete’s Sport Class must remain unchanged pending
the outcome of the Protest, but the Protested Athlete’s Sport Class
Status must immediately be changed to Review (R) unless the Protested
Athlete’s Sport Class Status is already Review (R);
21.4.2 the Chief Classifier must appoint a Protest Panel to conduct a new
Evaluation Session as soon as possible, which must be either at the
Competition the Protest was made or at the next Competition; and
21.4.3 WAS Wheelchair Fencing must notify all relevant parties of the time and
date the new Evaluation Session is to be conducted by the Protest
Panel.

22 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Protests

22.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may, in its discretion, make a Protest at any time
in respect of an Athlete under its jurisdiction if:
22.1.1 it considers an Athlete may have been allocated an incorrect Sport
Class; or

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 26
 22.1.2 a National Body or National Paralympic Committee makes a
documented request to IWAS Wheelchair Fencing. The assessment of
the validity of the request is at the sole discretion of IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing

23 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Protest Procedure

23.1 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing decides to make a Protest, the Head of
Classification must advise the relevant National Body or National Paralympic
Committee of the Protest at the earliest possible opportunity.
23.2 The Head of Classification must provide the relevant National Body or
National Paralympic Committee with a written explanation as to why the
Protest has been made and the basis on which the Head of Classification
considers it is justified.
23.3 If IWAS Wheelchair Fencing makes a Protest:
23.3.1 the Protested Athlete’s Sport Class must remain unchanged pending
the outcome of the Protest;
23.3.2 the Protested Athlete’s Sport Class Status must immediately be
changed to Review (R) unless the Protested Athlete’s Sport Class Status
is already Review (R); and
23.3.3 a Protest Panel must be appointed to resolve the Protest as soon as is
reasonably possible.

24 Protest Panel
24.1 A Chief Classifier may fulfil one or more of the Head of Classification’s
obligations in this Article 24 if authorised to do so by the Head of
Classification.
24.2 A Protest Panel must be appointed by the Head of Classification in a manner
consistent with the provisions for appointing a Classification Panel in these
Classification Rules.
24.3 A Protest Panel must not include any person who was a member of the
Classification Panel that:
24.3.1 made the Protested Decision; or
24.3.2 conducted any component of Athlete Evaluation in respect of the
Protested Athlete within a period of 12 months prior to the date of the
Protested Decision, unless otherwise agreed by the National Body,
National Paralympic Committee or IWAS Wheelchair Fencing
(whichever is relevant).
24.4 The Head of Classification must notify all relevant parties of the time and
date for the Evaluation Session that must be conducted by the Protest Panel.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 27
24.5 The Protest Panel must conduct the new Evaluation Session in accordance
with these Classification Rules. The Protest Panel may refer to the Protest
Documents when conducting the new Evaluation Session.
24.6 The Protest Panel must allocate a Sport Class and designate a Sport Class
Status. All relevant parties must be notified of the Protest Panel’s decision in
a manner consistent with the provisions for notification in these Classification
Rules.
24.7 The decision of a Protest Panel in relation to both a National Protest and an
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Protest is final. A National Body, National
Paralympic Committee or IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may not make another
Protest at the relevant Competition.

25 Provisions Where No Protest Panel is Available

25.1 If a Protest is made at a Competition but there is no opportunity for the
Protest to be resolved at that Competition:
25.1.1 the Protested Athlete must be permitted to compete in the Sport Class
that is the subject of the Protest with Sport Class Status Review (R),
pending the resolution of the Protest; and
25.1.2 all reasonable steps must be taken to ensure that the Protest is resolved
at the earliest opportunity.

26 Special Provisions
IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may make arrangements for some or all of the
components of Athlete Evaluation to be carried out at a place and at a
time away from a Competition. If so, IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must also
implement Protest provisions to enable Protests to take place in respect of
any Evaluation Sessions carried out away from a Competition.

Application during Major Competitions

27 Ad Hoc Provisions Relating to Protests
27.1 The IPC and/or IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may issue special ad hoc
provisions to operate during the Paralympic Games or other Competitions.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 28
Part Seven: Misconduct during Evaluation Session
Failure to Attend Evaluation Session
28.1 An Athlete is personally responsible for attending an Evaluation Session.
28.2 An Athlete’s National Body or National Paralympic Committee must take
reasonable steps to ensure that the Athlete attends an Evaluation Session.
28.3 If an Athlete fails to attend an Evaluation Session, the Classification Panel will
report the failure to the Chief Classifier. The Chief Classifier may, if satisfied
that a reasonable explanation exists for the failure to attend and subject to
the practicalities at a Competition, specify a revised date and time for the
Athlete to attend a further Evaluation Session before the Classification Panel.
28.4 If the Athlete is unable to provide a reasonable explanation for non-
attendance, or if the Athlete fails to attend an Evaluation Session on a
second occasion, no Sport Class will be allocated, and the Athlete will not
be permitted to compete at the relevant Competition.

Suspension of Evaluation Session

29.1 A Classification Panel, in consultation with the Chief Classifier, may suspend
an Evaluation Session if it cannot allocate a Sport Class to the Athlete,
including but not limited to, in one or more of the following circumstances:
29.1.1 a failure on the part of the Athlete to comply with any part of these
Classification Rules;
29.1.2 a failure on the part of the Athlete to provide any medical information
that is reasonably required by the Classification Panel;
29.1.3 the Classification Panel believes that the use (or non-use) of any
medication and/or medical procedures/device/implant disclosed by
the Athlete will affect the ability to conduct its determination in a fair
manner;
29.1.4 the Athlete has a Health Condition that may limit or prohibit complying
with requests by the Classification Panel during an Evaluation Session,
which the Classification Panel considers will affect its ability to conduct
the Evaluation Session in a fair manner;

29.1.5 the Athlete is unable to communicate effectively with the Classification

Panel;
29.1.6 the Athlete refuses or is unable to comply with any reasonable
instructions given by any Classification Personnel to such an extent that
the Evaluation Session cannot be conducted in a fair manner; and/or
29.1.7 the Athlete’s representation of his or her abilities is inconsistent with any
information available to the Classification Panel to such an extent that
the Evaluation Session cannot be conducted in a fair manner.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 29
29.2 If an Evaluation Session is suspended by a Classification Panel, the following
steps must be taken:
29.2.1 an explanation for the suspension and details of the remedial action
that is required on the part of the Athlete will be provided to the Athlete
and/or the relevant National Body or National Paralympic Committee;
29.2.2 if the Athlete takes the remedial action to the satisfaction of the Chief
Classifier or Head of Classification, the Evaluation Session will be
resumed; and
29.2.3 if the Athlete fails to comply and does not take the remedial action
within the timeframe specified, the Evaluation Session will be
terminated, and the Athlete must be precluded from competing at any
Competition until the determination is completed.
29.3 If an Evaluation Session is suspended by a Classification Panel, the
Classification Panel may designate the Athlete as Classification Not
Completed (CNC) in accordance with Article 10 of these Classification
Rules.
29.4 A Suspension of an Evaluation Session may be subject to further investigation
into any possible Intentional Misrepresentation.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 30
Part Eight: Medical Review
Medical Review
30.1 This Article applies to any Athlete who has been allocated a Sport Class with
Sport Class Status Confirmed (C) or Review with Fixed Review Date (FRD).
30.2 A Medical Review Request must be made if a change in the nature or
degree of an Athlete’s Impairment changes the Athlete’s ability to execute
the specific tasks and activities required by a sport in a manner that is clearly
distinguishable from changes attributable to levels of training, fitness and
proficiency.
30.3 A Medical Review Request must be made by the Athlete’s National Body or
National Paralympic Committee (together with a non-refundable fee,
specified on the Medical Review Request Form, and any supporting
documentation). The Medical Review Request must explain how and to
what extent the Athlete’s Impairment has changed and why it is believed
that the Athlete’s ability to execute the specific tasks and activities required
by a sport has changed.
30.4 A Medical Review Request must be received by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing
as soon as reasonably practicable.
30.5 The Head of Classification must decide whether or not the Medical Review
Request is upheld as soon as is practicable following receipt of the Medical
Review Request.
30.6 Any Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel who becomes aware of such
changes outlined in Article 30.2 but fails to draw those to the attention of
their National Body, National Paralympic Committee or IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing may be investigated in respect of possible Intentional
Misrepresentation.
30.7 If a Medical Review Request is accepted, the Athlete’s Sport Class Status will
be changed to Review (R) with immediate effect.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 31
Part Nine: Intentional Misrepresentation
Intentional Misrepresentation
31.1 It is a disciplinary offence for an Athlete to intentionally misrepresent (either
by act or omission) his or her skills and/or abilities and/or the degree or nature
of Eligible Impairment during Athlete Evaluation and/or at any other point
after the allocation of a Sport Class. This disciplinary offence is referred to as
‘Intentional Misrepresentation’.
31.2 It will be a disciplinary offence for any Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel
to assist an Athlete in committing Intentional Misrepresentation or to be in
any other way involved in any other type of complicity involving Intentional
Misrepresentation, including but not limited to covering up Intentional
Misrepresentation or disrupting any part of the Athlete Evaluation process.
31.3 In respect of any allegation relating to Intentional Misrepresentation a
hearing will be convened by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to determine
whether the Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel has committed Intentional
Misrepresentation.
31.4 The consequences to be applied to an Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel
who is found to have been guilty of Intentional Misrepresentation and/or
complicity involving Intentional Misrepresentation will be one or more of the
following:
31.4.1 disqualification from all events at the Competition at which the
Intentional Misrepresentation occurred, and any subsequent
Competitions at which the Athlete competed;
31.4.2 being allocated with Sport Class Not Eligible (NE) and designated a
Review with Fixed Review Date (FRD) Sport Class Status for a specified
period of time ranging from 1 to 4 years;
31.4.3 suspension from participation in Competitions in all sport for a specified
period of time ranging from 1 to 4 years; and
31.4.4 publication of their names and suspension period.
31.5 Any Athlete who is found to have been guilty of Intentional
Misrepresentation and/or complicity involving Intentional Misrepresentation
on more than one occasion will be allocated Sport Class Not Eligible with
Fixed Review Date Status for a period of time from four years to life.
31.6 Any Athlete Support Personnel who is found to have been guilty of
Intentional Misrepresentation and/or complicity involving Intentional
Misrepresentation on more than one occasion will be suspended from
participation in any Competition for a period of time from four years to life.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 32
31.7 If another International Sports Federation brings disciplinary proceedings
against an Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel in respect of Intentional
Misrepresentation which results in consequences being imposed on that
Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel, those consequences will be
recognised, respected and enforced by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
31.8 Any consequences to be applied to teams, which include an Athlete or
Athlete Support Personnel who is found to have been guilty of Intentional
Misrepresentation and/or complicity involving Intentional Misrepresentation,
will be at the discretion of IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
31.9 Any disciplinary action taken by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing pursuant these
Classification Rules must be resolved in accordance with the applicable
Board of Appeal of Classification Bylaws.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 33
Part Ten: Use of Athlete Information
32 Classification Data
32.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may only Process Classification Data if such
Classification Data is considered necessary to conduct Classification.
32.2 All Classification Data Processed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must be
accurate, complete and kept up-to-date.

33 Consent and Processing

33.1 Subject to Article 33.3, IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may only Process
Classification Data with the consent of the Athlete to whom that
Classification Data relates.
33.2 If an Athlete cannot provide consent (for example because the Athlete is
under age) the legal representative, guardian or other designated
representative of that Athlete must give consent on their behalf.
33.3 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may only Process Classification Data without
consent of the relevant Athlete if permitted to do so in accordance with
National Laws.

34 Classification Research
34.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may request that an Athlete provide it with
Personal Information for Research Purposes.
34.2 The use by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing of Personal Information for Research
Purposes must be consistent with these Classification Rules and all
applicable ethical use requirements.
34.3 Personal Information that has been provided by an Athlete to IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing solely and exclusively for Research Purposes must not
be used for any other purpose.
34.4 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may only use Classification Data for Research
Purposes with the express consent of the relevant Athlete. If IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing wishes to publish any Personal Information provided by an Athlete
for Research Purposes, it must obtain consent to do so from that Athlete prior
to any publication. This restriction does not apply if the publication is
anonymised so that it does not identify any Athlete(s) who consented to the
use of their Personal Information.

35 Notification to Athletes
35.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must notify an Athlete who provides Classification
Data as to:

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 34
 35.1.1 that fact that IWAS Wheelchair Fencing is collecting the Classification
Data; and
35.1.2 the purpose for the collection of the Classification Data; and
35.1.3 the duration that the Classification Data will be retained.

36 Classification Data Security

36.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must:
36.1.1 protect Classification Data by applying appropriate security
safeguards, including physical, organisational, technical and other
measures to prevent the loss, theft or unauthorised access, destruction,
use, modification or disclosure of Classification Data; and
36.1.2 take reasonable steps to ensure that any other party provided with
Classification Data uses that Classification Data in a manner consistent
with these Classification Rules.

37 Disclosures of Classification Data

37.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must not disclose Classification Data to other
Classification Organisations except where such disclosure is related to
Classification conducted by another Classification Organisation and/or the
disclosure is consistent with applicable National Laws.
37.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may disclose Classification Data to other parties
only if such disclosure is in accordance with these Classification Rules and
permitted by National Laws.

38 Retaining Classification Data

38.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must ensure that Classification Data is only
retained for as long as it is needed for the purpose it was collected. If
Classification Data is no longer necessary for Classification purposes, it must
be deleted, destroyed or permanently anonymised.
38.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must publish guidelines regarding retention times
in relation to Classification Data.
38.3 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must implement policies and procedures that
ensure that Classifiers and Classification Personnel retain Classification Data
for only as long as is necessary in order for them to carry out their
Classification duties in relation to an Athlete.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 35
39 Access Rights to Classification Data
39.1 Athletes may request from IWAS Wheelchair Fencing:
39.1.1 confirmation of whether or not that IWAS Wheelchair Fencing Processes
Classification Data relating to them personally and a description of the
Classification Data that is held;
39.1.2 a copy of the Classification Data held by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing;
and/or
39.1.3 correction or deletion of the Classification Data held by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing.
39.2 A request may be made by an Athlete or a National Body or a National
Paralympic Committee on an Athlete’s behalf and must be complied with
within a reasonable period of time.

Classification Master Lists

40.1 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must maintain a Classification Master List of
Athletes, which must include the Athlete’s name, gender, year of birth,
country, Sport Class and Sport Class Status. The Classification Master List must
identify Athletes that enter International Competitions.
40.2 IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must make available the Classification Master List
to all relevant National Bodies on the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing website.

Part Eleven: Appeals

41 Appeal
41.1 An Appeal is the process by which a formal objection to how Athlete
Evaluation and/or Classification procedures have been conducted is
submitted and subsequently resolved.

42 Parties Permitted to Make an Appeal

42.1 An Appeal may only be made by one of the following bodies:
42.1.1 a National Body; or
42.1.2 a National Paralympic Committee.

43 Appeals
43.1 If a National Body or National Paralympic Committee considers there have
been procedural errors made in respect of the allocation of a Sport Class
and/or Sport Class Status and as a consequence an Athlete has been

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 36
 allocated an incorrect Sport Class or Sport Class Status, it may submit an
Appeal.
43.2 The Board of Appeal of Classification (BAC) will act as the hearing body for
the resolution of Appeals.
43.3 An Appeal must be made and resolved in accordance with the applicable
BAC Bylaws.

44 Ad Hoc Provisions Relating to Appeals

44.1 The IPC and/or IWAS Wheelchair Fencing may issue special ad hoc
provisions to operate during the Paralympic Games or other Competitions.

Part Twelve: Glossary

Adaptive Equipment: Implements and apparatus adapted to the special needs of
Athletes, and used by Athletes during Competition to facilitate participation and/or
to achieve results.
Appeals: The means by which a complaint that IWAS Wheelchair Fencing has made
an unfair decision during the Classification process is resolved.
Athlete: For purposes of Classification, any person who participates in sport at the
international level (as defined by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing) or national level (as
defined by each National Federation) and any additional person who participates
in sport at a lower level if designated by the person's National Federation.
Athlete Evaluation: The process by which an Athlete is assessed in accordance with
these Classification Rules in order that an Athlete may be allocated a Sport Class
and Sport Class Status.
Athlete Support Personnel: Any coach, trainer, manager, interpreter, agent, team
staff, official, medical or para-medical personnel working with or treating Athletes
participating in or preparing for training and/or Competition.
BAC: The IPC Board of Appeal of Classification.
Chief Classifier: A classifier appointed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to direct,
administer, co-ordinate and implement Classification matters for a specific
Competition according to these Classification Rules.
Classification: Grouping Athletes into Sport Classes according to how much their
Impairment affects fundamental activities in each specific sport or discipline. This is
also referred to as Athlete Classification.
Classification Data: Personal Information and/or sensitive Personal Information
provided by an Athlete and/or a National Body and/or any other person to a
Classification Organisation in connection with Classification.
Classification Intelligence: Information obtained and used by an International Sport
Federation in relation to Classification.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 37
Classification Master List: A list made available by the IWAS Wheelchair Fencing that
identifies Athletes who have been allocated a Sport Class and designated a Sport
Class Status.
Classification Not Completed: the designation applied to an Athlete who has
commenced but not completed Athlete Evaluation to the satisfaction of IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing.
Classification Organisation: Any organisation that conducts the process of Athlete
Evaluation and allocates Sport Classes and/or holds Classification Data.
Classification Panel: A group of Classifiers, appointed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing,
to determine Sport Class and Sport Class Status in accordance with these
Classification Rules.
Classification Personnel: Persons, including Classifiers, acting with the authority of a
Classification Organisation in relation to Athlete Evaluation, for example
administrative officers.
Classification Rules: Also referred to as Classification Rules and Regulations. The
policies, procedures, protocols and descriptions adopted by IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing in connection with Athlete Evaluation.
Classification System: The framework used by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to develop
and designate Sport Classes within a IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
Classifier: A person authorised as an official by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to
evaluate Athletes as a member of a Classification Panel.
Classifier Certification: The processes by which IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must assess
that a Classifier has met the specific Classifier Competencies required to obtain and
maintain certification or licensure.
Classifier Competencies: The qualifications and abilities that IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing deems necessary for a Classifier to be competent to conduct Athlete
Evaluation for sport(s) governed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
Classifier Code of Conduct: The behavioural and ethical standards for Classifiers
specified by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing.
Code: The Athlete Classification Code 2015 together with the International
Standards for: Athlete Evaluation; Eligible Impairments; Protests and Appeals;
Classifier Personnel and Training; and Classification Data Protection.
Competition: A series of individual events conducted together under one ruling
body.
Compliance: The implementation of rules, regulations, policies and processes that
adhere to the text, spirit and intent of the Code as defined by the IPC. Where terms
such as (but not limited to) 'comply', 'conform' and 'in accordance' are used in the
Code they shall have the same meaning as 'Compliance.'
Continuing Education: The delivery of higher knowledge and practical skills
specified by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to preserve and/or advance knowledge and
skills as a Classifier in the sport(s) under its governance.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 38
Diagnostic Information: Medical records and/or any other documentation that
enables IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to assess the existence or otherwise of an Eligible
Impairment or Underlying Health Condition
Eligible Impairment: An Impairment designated as being a prerequisite for
competing in IWAS Wheelchair Fencing, as detailed in these Classification Rules.
Eligibility Assessment Committee: An ad hoc body formed to assess the existence
or otherwise of an Eligible Impairment.
Entry Criteria: Standards set by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing relating to the expertise or
experience levels of persons who wish to be Classifiers. This may be, for example,
former Athletes or coaches, sports scientists, physical educators and medical
professionals, all of whom have the qualifications and abilities relevant to conduct
all, or specific parts of, Athlete Evaluation.
Entry-level Education: the basic knowledge and practical skills specified by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing to begin as a Classifier in the sport(s) under its governance.
Evaluation Session: the session an Athlete is required to attend for a Classification
Panel to assess that Athlete’s compliance with the Minimum Impairment Criteria for
a sport; and allocation of a Sport Class and Sport Class Status depending on the
extent to which that Athlete is able to execute the specific tasks and activities
fundamental to that sport. An Evaluation Session may include Observation in
Competition.
Event: A single race, match, game or singular sport contest.
First Appearance: The first time an Athlete competes in an Event during a
Competition in a particular Sport Class.
Fixed Review Date: A date set by a Classification Panel prior to which an Athlete
designated with a Sport Class Status Review with a Fixed Review Date will not be
required to attend an Evaluation Session save pursuant to a Medical Review
Request and/or Protest.
Head of Classification: A person appointed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to direct,
administer, co-ordinate and implement Classification matters for IWAS Wheelchair
Fencing.
Health Condition: A pathology, acute or chronic disease, disorder, injury or trauma.
Impairment: A Physical, Vision or Intellectual Impairment.
Intellectual Impairment: A limitation in intellectual functioning and adaptive
behaviour as expressed in conceptual, social and practical adaptive skills that
originates before the age of eighteen (18).
Intentional Misrepresentation: A deliberate attempt (either by fact or omission) to
mislead an International Sport Federation or National Body as to the existence or
extent of skills and/or abilities relevant to a IWAS Wheelchair Fencing and/or the
degree or nature of Eligible Impairment during Athlete Evaluation and/or at any
other point after the allocation of a Sport Class.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 39
International Competitions: A Competition where the IPC, an International Sport
Federation or a Major Competition Organisation is the governing body for the
Competition and/or appoints the technical officials for the Competition.
International Sport Federation: A sport federation recognised by the IPC as the sole
world-wide representative of a sport for Athletes with an Impairment that has been
granted the status as a IWAS Wheelchair Fencing by the IPC. The IPC and the
International Organisations of Sports for the Disabled act as an International Sport
Federation for certain sports.
International Standards: A document complementing the Code and providing
additional technical and operational requirements for Classification.
IPC: International Paralympic Committee.
Maintaining Certification: The advanced training, education and practice
necessary for continued competency as a Classifier.
Major Competition Organiser: An organisation that functions as the ruling body for
an International Competition.
Medical Diagnostics Form: a form that a National Body or National Paralympic
Committee must submit in order for an Athlete to undergo Athlete Evaluation,
identifying the Athlete’s Health Condition if so required.
Medical Review: The process by which IWAS Wheelchair Fencing identifies if a
change in the nature or degree of an Athlete’s Impairment means that some or all
of the components of Athlete Evaluation are required to be undertaken in order to
ensure that any Sport Class allocated to that Athlete is correct.
Medical Review Request: A request made by a National Body or National
Paralympic Committee for Medical Review, made on behalf of an Athlete.
Models of Best Practice: An ad hoc guidance document prepared by the IPC to
assist in the implementation of the Code and International Standards.
National Body: Refers to the national member of an International Sport Federation.
National Laws: The national data protection and privacy laws, regulations and
policies applicable to a Classification Organisation.
National Paralympic Committees: The national member of the IPC who is the sole
representative of Athletes with an Impairment in that country or territory. These are
the national members of the IPC.
National Protest: A Protest made by a National Body or a National Paralympic
Committee in respect of an Athlete under its jurisdiction.
Non-Competition Venue: Any place or location (outside of a Competition)
designated by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing as being a place or location where Athlete
Evaluation is made available to Athletes in order that they may be allocated a Sport
Class and designated with a Sport Class Status.
Observation in Competition: The observation of an Athlete in a Competition by a
Classification Panel so that the Classification Panel can complete its determination

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 40
as to the extent to which an Eligible Impairment affects that Athlete’s ability to
execute the specific tasks and activities fundamental to the sport.
Paralympic Games: Umbrella term for both Paralympic Games and Paralympic
Winter Games.
Permanent: The term Permanent as used in the Code and Standards describes an
Impairment that is unlikely to be resolved meaning the principle effects are lifelong.
Personal Information: Any information that refers to, or relates directly to, an Athlete.
Physical Impairment: An Impairment that affects an Athlete’s biomechanical
execution of sporting activities, comprising Ataxia, Athetosis, Hypertonia, Impaired
Muscle Power, Impaired Passive Range of Movement, Limb Deficiency, Leg Length
Difference and Short Stature.
Process/Processing: The collection, recording, storage, use or disclosure of Personal
Information and/or sensitive Personal Information.
Protested Athlete: An Athlete whose Sport Class is being challenged.
Protested Decision: The Sport Class decision being challenged.
Protest Documents: The information provided in the Protest Form together with the
Protest Fee.
Protest Fee: The fee prescribed by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing, payable by the
National Body or National Paralympic Committee when submitting a Protest.
Protest Form: The form on which a National Protest must be submitted.
Protest: The procedure by which a reasoned objection to an Athlete’s Sport Class is
submitted and subsequently resolved.
Protest Panel: A Classification Panel appointed by the Chief Classifier to conduct an
Evaluation Session as a result of a Protest
Re-certification: The process by which IWAS Wheelchair Fencing must assess that a
Classifier has maintained specific Classifier Competencies.
Recognised Competition: A Competition that is sanctioned or approved by IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing.
Research Purposes: Research into matters pertaining to the development of sports
within the Paralympic Movement, including the impact of Impairment on the
fundamental activities in each specific sport and the impact of assistive technology
on such activities.
Signatories: Any organisation that accepts the Code and commits to implement it
and the International Standards by way of its Classification Rules.
Sport Class: A category for Competition defined by IWAS Wheelchair Fencing by
reference to the extent to which an Athlete can perform the specific tasks and
activities required by a sport.
Sport Class Status: A designation applied to a Sport Class to indicate the extent to
which an Athlete may be required to undertake Athlete Evaluation and/or be
subject to a Protest.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 41
Tracking Code Observation Assessment (OA): a designation given to an Athlete
that replaces the Athlete’s Sport Class Status until Observation in Competition has
been completed.
Underlying Health Condition: A Health Condition that may lead to an Eligible
Impairment.
Vision Impairment: An Impairment of the eye structure, optical nerves or optical
pathways, or visual cortex of the central brain that adversely affects an Athlete’s
vision.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 42
Appendix One
Wheelchair Fencing Sport Classes for Athletes with Physical Impairment

This appendix is intended to outline the process by which an athlete will be classified and
allocated to which ever wheelchair Fencing Sport Class they are eligible.
This appendix is divided into three sections:
1. Eligible Impairment Types
2. Minimum Impairment Criteria
3. Methods of assessment
4. Sports Classes

1.Eligible and Non-Eligible Impairment Types for the sport of Wheelchair Fencing
1.1 Eligible Impairment Types

Eligible Impairment Examples of Health conditions *Relevant ICF

Impairment
code
Impaired Muscle Power
Athletes with Impaired Muscle Examples of an Underlying Health B730
Power have a Health Condition that can lead to Impaired
Condition that either reduces Muscle Power include spinal cord
or eliminates their ability to injury (complete or incomplete,
voluntarily contract their tetra-or paraplegia or paraparesis),
muscles in order to move or to muscular dystrophy, post-polio
generate force syndrome and spina bifida.
Limb Deficiency
Athletes with Limb Deficiency Examples of an Underlying Health S740
have total or partial absence Condition that can lead to Limb
S750
of bones or joints as a Deficiency include: traumatic
consequence of trauma. amputation, illness (for example
amputation due to bone cancer) or
congenital limb deficiency (for
example dysmelia).
Hypertonia
Athletes with hypertonia have Examples of an Underlying Health B735
an increase in muscle tension Condition that can lead to
and a reduced ability of a Hypertonia include cerebral palsy,
muscle to stretch caused by traumatic brain injury and stroke.
damage to the central
nervous system.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 43
 Ataxia
Athletes with Ataxia have Examples of an Underlying Health B760
uncoordinated movements Condition that can lead to Ataxia
caused by damage to the include: cerebral palsy, traumatic
central nervous system. brain injury, stroke and multiple
sclerosis.
Athetosis
Athletes with Athetosis have Examples of an Underlying Health B7650
continual slow involuntary Condition that can lead to Athetosis
movements. include cerebral palsy, traumatic
brain injury and stroke.
Impaired Passive Range of Examples of an Underlying Health
Movement Condition that can lead to Impaired
B7100-7102
Passive Range of Movement include
Athletes with Impaired Passive
athrogryposis and contracture
Range of Movement have a
resulting from chronic joint
restriction or a lack of passive
immobilisation or trauma affecting a
movement in one or more
joint.
joints.

*For further information on ICF codes, including how to obtain a copy of the ICF, visit the
website at http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.

1.2 Non-Eligible Impairments

The following Impairment types are examples of non-eligible Impairments for the sport
of Wheelchair Fencing:
 Mental functions (v140-189), including impairments of psychomotor control (b1470),
quality of psychomotor functions (b1471), visuospatial perception (b1565), higher-
level cognitive functions required for organization and planning movement (b1641);
mental functions required for sequencing and coordinating complex, purposeful
movements (b176)
 Hearing functions (b230-249)
 Pain (b280-0289)
 Joint instability (b715), including unstable shoulder joint and joint dislocation
 Muscle endurance functions (b740)
 Motor reflex functions (b750)
 involuntary movement reaction functions (b755)
 Tics and mannerism (b7652)
 Stereotypes and motor perseveration (b7653)
 Cardiovascular functions (b410-429)
 Respiratory functions (b440-449)
 Functions related to metabolism and the endocrine system (b540-559)
 Short Stature (s730.343, s750.343, s760.349)
 Visual impairment (b201)
(ICF Codes)

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 44
1.3 Athletes, who are affected by an Eligible Impairment in combination with any of the
non-eligible impairments listed in Article 1.2 of this Appendix, will be assessed against
the extent of Activity Limitation resulting from the Eligible Impairment only.

1.4 The Eligible Impairment is identified by means of the Medical Diagnostics Form and
attached medical documentation that must be made available to the Classification
Panel before Athlete Evaluation begins

2. Minimum Impairment Criteria

In order to be eligible to compete in Wheelchair Fencing, the Athlete's Eligible
Impairment as defined in Article 1.1 of this Appendix must meet one of the Minimum
Impairment Criteria described below. The minimum Impairment criteria (MIC) must be
demonstrated by the athlete either prior to or as part of the Athlete Assessment.

2.1 Limb Deficiency (s720-750)

Amputation through the ankle (Syme’s amputation), or
Dysmelia resulting in the absence of a full ankle joint.

2.2 Impaired Muscle Power (b730)

Decrease in muscle strength of at least 20 points in one lower limb, or
A decrease of at least 25 points in both lower limbs cross ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion,
inversion and eversion, knee flexion and extension, hip flexion and extension and hip
adduction and abduction.
(max. 100 points in both lower limbs)

2.3 Impaired passive range of movement (b7100-7102)

Complete ankylosis in one ankle joint, or
Impaired range of movement that results in a functional deficit in the lower limbs
comparable to the loss of muscle strength described in 2.2.
Decrease in the ROM of at least 20 points in one lower limb or
At least 25 points in both lower limbs cross ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion, inversion and
eversion, knee flexion and extension, hip flexion and extension and hip adduction and
abduction.
(max. 100 points in both lower limbs)

2.4 Hypertonia
Hypertonia is defined as increased muscle tone which is caused by central nervous system
impairment and which can result in increased rigidity in muscle and increased resistance to
passive lengthening of the muscle.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 45
For athletes affected by spasticity, dystonia or rigidity the modified Ashworth Scale can be
used, or points are awarded for each controlled action from the Range of Motion
Dysfunction Score Chart.
Athletes with Hypertonia must demonstrate grade 1 or 1+ on the Modified Ashworth Scale
or 4 points on the ROM dysfunction Score, and must show a functional deficit in the lower
limbs restricting joint movement.

2.5 Ataxia
Ataxia is a term for a group of disorders that affect co-ordination, balance and speech.
Eligible Ataxias must result from motor nervous system dysfunction. Ataxia symptoms may
develop as the result of trauma, a stoke, multiple sclerosis, a brain tumour, nutritional
deficiencies or other problems that damage the brain or nervous system.
For athletes affected by ataxia, where balance, walking and coordination are affected,
the ataxic movement must be clearly evident to the classification panel during the
assessment. Tests that may be useful for determining this include but are not limited to:
 Finger to nose test (athlete touches classifiers finger held in front of them to own
nose.)
 Alternate hand fist clenching (athletes arm outstretched in front)
 Roll of forearms around each other (arms in 90-degree elbow flexion and in
rotation)
 Sitting, hands touching shoulder from knee.
 Heel shin test (draw the heel of one leg along the length of the opposite shin)
 Have a look at the walk and gait of the athlete.
Alternating movements of the pair of muscles/joints should be performed at a steady
pace, and at an increasing pace. Fast movements should be used if the impairment of
coordination is not obvious on moderate movements.

2.6 Athetosis
Athetosis is a symptom characterised by unwanted posturing and slow, involuntary,
convoluted writhing movements of the fingers, hands, feet and in some cases arms, legs
and neck. It is caused by damage to the motor control of centres of the brain. When
evaluating an athlete, classifiers must satisfy itself that athetosis is clearly evident and at
least one of the following should be observed:
 involuntary movement of the toes or lower extremities despite the athlete trying to
remain still.
 Involuntary movement of the upper extremities that affects balance and walking.
 Inability to hold the body still – swaying of the body.
 Characteristic athetoid posturing of the limbs and/or trunk.
The athlete will not be eligible if the athetoid movements of the face are the sole
impairment.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 46
3. Methods of Assessment
Wheelchair Fencing Classification is based upon a combination of physical and technical
assessment. Muscle power, range of motion and co-ordination will all be assessed including
the trunk stability and muscle power in the fencing arm.
The following methods of assessment will be used during the Athlete technical and physical
assessment.
3.1 Manual Muscle testing is conducted following Kendall, F.P., McCreary, E.K., Provance,
P.G., McIntyre Rodgers, M., & Romani, W.A. (2005). Muscles: Testing and function with
posture and pain. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
3.2 The neurological and functional assessment of athletes with loss of muscle power will
be conducted in accordance with the ASIA Classification and will be taken into
consideration when provided by a medical practitioner. (Maynard (1997):
International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord
Injury).
3.3 Coordination-related impairments are evaluated by means of the Modified Ashworth
Scale as defined in Bohannon, R. and Smith, M. (1987). "lnterrater reliability of a
modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity." Physical Therapy 67(2): 206.
For range of motion dysfunction; co-ordination is the principal parameter to evaluate
cerebral palsy and other neurological conditions. For athletes affected by spasticity,
dystonia or athetosis, points are awarded for each controlled action. This is used in
conjunction with the Modified Ashworth Scale, when appropriate.
3.4 Limitations in active and passive range of movement are assessed from anatomical
reference points as identified in Berryman Reese, N., & Bandy, W.D. (2002). Joint Range
of Motion and Muscle Length Testing. W.B. Saunders Company.
The range of motion in the case of injury being of orthopaedic origin, and may have
problems of ankylosis of latent pathology in a reduction of range of movement, the
point score (from 0 to 5)
3.5 Loss of limb is assessed by means of measurement of the anatomical reference points
as identified in Berryman Reese, N., & Bandy, W.D. (2002). Joint Range of Motion and
Muscle Length Testing. W.B. Saunders Company.
3.6 Muscle power and range of movement are assessed over the functional range for the
sport of Wheelchair Fencing as described in Table 1 below.
The muscle power will be assessed according to the point score based upon the
Daniels and Worthingham (D & W) scale published in 2002.
3.7 The assessment of trunk stability for the purpose of identifying the level of balance and
recovery is performed using the bench test and wheelchair functional tests in Table 2
below.
3.8 The Classifiers may ask the Athlete to undergo a Technical Assessment. During the
Technical Assessment the Athlete will be asked to perform or simulate one or more
functional fencing moves, which includes but is not limited to: en guarde positioning,
lunge, recovery and backward lean. Such assessment should typically take place
during official training and may be confirmed by the observation in competition.

3.1 Assessments Regarding the use of Adaptive Equipment:

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 47
3.1.1 Besides allocating a Sport Class, the Classification Panel must also determine if, and
to what extent, the Athlete may use any adaptive equipment in competition.
3.1.2 The Athlete may only use adaptive equipment, i.e. strapping or individualised
weapon handles for grip in those with impaired hand/arm function, if permitted by the
Classification Panel and indicated on the Classification card. In case the Athlete
would like to use further adaptive equipment, and the Athlete has a Sport Class Status
Confirmed or Review with Fixed Review Date, he or she shall request for a re-
assessment pursuant to the Medical Review procedures defined in these Rules.

3.2 Assessment of the Muscle Power in the Fencing Arm

3.2.1 Besides identifying the Sport Class, the Classification Panel will also assess muscle
power in the fencing arm for athletes in Sport Class 1 for the purpose of identifying if
the Athlete may use an adapted weapon grip or strapping to hold the weapon in
place.

3.2.2 The assessment of muscle power in the fencing arm includes:

 Assessment of Pronation/supination in the forearm
 Assessment of wrist flexion/extension
 Assessment of finger flexion
 Assessment of thumb and finger opposition

3.3 Observation in Competition

If a Classification Panel requires an athlete to complete observation in competition
this will take place during the first appearance, unless this is part of a Review.
All members of the Classification panel will observe the athlete, during any part of
the competition or competitive fencing. This is to confirm when necessary, the
activities demonstrated during the physical and technical assessment involving the
Wheelchair fencing tests, co-ordination, range of motion and demonstrated muscle
strength.
During competitive fencing the classifiers will observe the repeated sports specific
activities such as luging and recovery, at varying speeds and direction. Fine
coordination skills with the weapon and reactions including range of motion used will
be observed.
3.3.1 Observation Assessment
Athletes will be observed during competitive fencing and may also be observed during
training. The Athletes will be observed by the classification Panel during the preliminary
rounds of the competition and will have sport specific and functional activities assessed.
Classifiers will observe the activities of the lunge, recovery, range of motion of the trunk,
accuracy and coordination. They will observe speeds, direction, duration and reaction
times in order to evaluate the functionality of the athlete. The Assessment will be marked
on a separate Observation Card and each item scored from 0-3. This will be compared to
the bench test and functional assessments made during the physical assessment. The final
classification status will be given depending on the results of these two assessments.
The final results of the assessments will be recorded on the Athlete's Classification Card.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 48
 3.4

Table 1 Wheelchair Fencing Bench Tests - Upper and Lower Limbs

JOINT MOVEMENT FULL R.O.M Muscle Test ROM Dysfunction

Right Left Right Left

Upper Limbs

Flexion 170

Extension 40

Abduction 180
Shoulder
Adduction 40

Ext. rotation 70

Int. rotation 70

Flexion 150

Extension 10
FENCING Elbow
Pronation 90
ARM
Supination 90

Flexion 50

Extension 60
Wrist
Ulnar flexion 40

Radial flexion 30

Flexion 90
Fingers
Adduction

Shoulder Adduction 40
NON
FENCING Elbow Flexion 150
ARM
Fingers Flexion 90

Lower Limbs

Flexion 90

Extension 10
Hip
Abduction 40

Adduction 30

Extension 5
LOWER LIMB Knee
Flexion 90

Ankle Plantar Flexion 50

Dorsiflexion 30

Eversion/Pronation 30

Inversion/supination 50

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 49
3.5
Table 2
Wheelchair Fencing Bench Tests Trunk and Functional Tests

Flexion upper
Flexion lower
BENCH TEST Extension upper
(0-5) Extension lower
Lateral flexion
TOTAL OF 25
1.Upper Extension
TRUNK
2. Side balance
WHEELCHAIR
3. Lumber extension
FUNCTIONAL TEST
4. Side balance with weapon
(0-3)
5. 45° rotated extension
6. Hold 45° inclination
TOTAL OF 18
TOTAL TRUNK OF 43

3.6 Point Scoring for Wheelchair Fencing Bench Tests

Muscle power:
0 point: zero- none of the available ROM gravity eliminated and there is no palpable or
observable muscle contraction.
1 point: trace – none of the available ROM gravity eliminated and there is a palpable or
observable flicker of muscle contraction
2 points: poor – the full available ROM gravity eliminated
3 points: fair – the full available ROM against gravity
4 points: good- the full available ROM against moderate resistance
5 points: normal – the full available ROM against gravity against maximal resistance.

Range of Motion Dysfunction

Co-ordination is the principal parameter to evaluate cerebral palsy and other neurological
conditions.
For athletes affected by spasticity, dystonia or athetosis, points are awarded for each
controlled action as follows:
1 point: non-functional movement, motory co-ordination is minimal or non-existent. (or
Modified Ashworth score = 4)
2 points: sequence of movement can only happen very slowly and with difficulty. If effected
with rapid repetition, it will not exceed 25% of the normal range of movement. (or
modified Ashworth Score = 3)
3 points: as above, up to 50% of full range of movement. (or Modified Ashworth Score = 2)
4 points: slight un co-ordination of movements and / or not more than 75% of normal range
of movement. (or Modified Ashworth Scale = 1or 1+)
5 points: normal motory co-ordination. (or modified Ashworth Scale = 0)
Used in conjunction with the Modified Ashworth Scale, below, when appropriate.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 50
 Modified Ashworth Scale – for Spasticity
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) measures resistance during passive soft tissue
stretching. MAS is performed in the supine position. The MAS is performed while
moving the limb at “the speed of gravity”; this is defined as the same speed at which
a non-spastic limb would drop naturally.
Scoring
0 = Normal tone, no increase in tone
1 = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or minimal
resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is
moved in flexion or extension.
1+ = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal
resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected
part(s) easily moved
3 = Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
4 = Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

The range of motion in the case of injury being of orthopaedic origin, and may have
problems of ankylosis of latent pathology in a reduction of range of movement, the
point score (from 0 to 5) is expressed as follows;
0 point: no range of movement
1 points: minimal range of movement
2 points: 1/4 of normal range of movement
3 points: 1/2 of normal range of movement
4 points: 3/4 of normal range of movement
5 points: normal range of movement

3.7 Point Score for Wheelchair Functional Tests

Functional tests, to be performed in the wheelchair, consist of an evaluation of the
extension and lateral inclination ability of the chest in different positions, with or without
the use of a weapon. The tested movements repeat specific technical moves, e.g.
lunge, i.e. a sudden and improvised lateral inclination of the trunk with the weapon in
the hand, with simultaneous extension of the elbow, or as many fast return movements
of the chest into its original position (or inclination from the opposite side) as for a "point
of measurement" (in order to avoid hits by the opponent). A point score as follows is
attributed during the tests:
0 Point: no function, movement cannot be put into effect
1 Point: very weak execution, minimum movement; the fencer can begin but not
complete the movements.
2 Points: weak execution, fair movement; can complete the movement with difficulty.
3 Points: normal execution.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 51
Wheelchair Function Tests
Test N° 1: Upper Extension

Consists of an evaluation of the extension of dorsal

musculature: the subject, seated in the wheelchair, from
a forward position of the trunk, tries to return to an upright
position, contracting the dorsal muscles and maintaining
the upper limbs retroflexed.

Test N° 2: Side Balance

Is an evaluation of lateral balance with abducted upper

limbs: the athlete has to move his own centre of gravity
laterally to the right and left to the point where he would
lose balance, thereby the lateral muscle function of the
trunk and of the oblique abdominal can be evaluated as
well as the lumbar muscle.

Test N° 3: Lumbar Extension

(Similar to test no 1) Evaluates the extension of the trunk,

but more specifically the lumbar muscles. The exercise is
executed with the hands on the back of the neck, thus
excluding both the inertial component of upper limb
movement (violently retroflexive in test no 1) and the aid
of the upper dorsal muscles of the trunk.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 52
Test N° 4: Side Balance with Weapon

Similar to test no 2, but presents more difficulties, since it

must be executed holding the weapon, the weight of which
significantly reduces the possibility of lateral inclination of
the trunk without losing balance.
The execution of tests No 2 and 4 will be performed firstly
with the limb on the opposite side (on the side towards
which the athlete does not move), not holding either the
wheelchair, nor the hand rim, nor the arm rest in order not
to discredit the validity of the exercise.
And secondly with the opposing limb holding onto the
wheelchair, arm rest or rim.
The athlete will be requested to hit a target during this test.

Test N° 5: 45degree Rotated Extension

Evaluates a trunk movement directed half the way

between test 1 / 3 and 2 / 4 ; the exercise is executed
holding; firstly without holding onto the chair, arm rest or
rim, and
Secondly with the opposing limb holding the wheelchair,
arm rest or rim. Fencers of class 2 normally cannot lean
forward in this direction without helping themselves
pushing the fencing arm against their leg.

Test N°6: 45 Degree Hold

Similar to test no 1; evaluates the extension of the trunk,

lumbar and dorsal muscles, the exercise is executed
holding the position leaning forward at 45°

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 53
4. Sport Class and the Designation of Sport Class Status
Athletes, who are eligible to compete and have the minimum Impairment criteria are
allocated a Sports Class. The Sport Class is allocated following the full athlete assessment
taking into consideration the point scores for the range of movement, muscle
power/strength and coordination testing, and the Wheelchair Function tests, and by
confirmation by athlete observation during fencing in competition and training.
Athletes, who meet the Minimum Disability Criteria defined in Article 2 of this Appendix, will
be allocated one of the below four Sport Classes:
Athletes, who are eligible to compete, are classified into the following Sport Classes.
4.1 Class 1A
Athletes with no sitting balance who have a handicapped playing arm. No efficient elbow
extension against gravity and no residual function of the hand which makes it necessary to
fix the weapon with a bandage. Such a class is comparable to the old ISMGF 1A, or
tetraplegics with spinal lesions level C5/C6.
Functional Test Score:
Test 1 and 2 combined total = less than 2 points
Test3, 4, 5 and 6 combined total = maximum 1 point
Trunk and lower limb bench tests = 0
No efficient elbow extension ROM = 1or 2
Finger and wrist Muscle strength = 0
Confirmation of Class is made by Observational Assessment during the competition and
training.

4.2 Class 1B
Athletes without sitting balance and affected fencing arm. Functional elbow extension but
no functional finger flexion. The weapon has to be fixed with a bandage. Comparable to
complete tetraplegics level C7/C8 or higher incomplete lesion.
Functional Test Score:
Test 1 and 2 combined total = less than 4
Test 3, 4, 5 and 6 combined total = maximum of 4 points
Trunk and lower limb Bench Tests = 0
Fencing arm extension and Muscle strength = 4 to 5
Finger functional flexion = 0
Weapon has to be fixed to the hand.
Confirmation of Class is made by Observational Assessment during the competition and
training.

4.3 Class 2
Athletes with fair sitting balance and normal fencing arm. e.g. paraplegic type T1 - T9 or
incomplete tetraplegics with minimally affected fencing arm and good sitting balance.
Functional Test Scores:

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 54
Test 1 and 2 total = not more than 4 points
Test 3, 4, 5 and 5 combined total = maximum of 6 points
Trunk and lower limb Bench tests = below 3, not against gravity
Fencing Arm ROM = 4 or 5
Fencing arm muscle strength = minimum 4 or 5
Modified Ashworth Scale = 1+ /2 or above for the fencing arm. (for neurological conditions)
Confirmation of Class is made by Observational Assessment during the competition and
training.

4.4 Class 3
Athletes with good Sitting balance, without support of legs and normal fencing arm, e.g.
paraplegics from T10 to L2
Functional Test Scores:
Test 1 = 3
Test 2 = 3 (or a minimum of 5 points for test 1 and 2 combined.)
Test 3, 4 and 5, total = a minimum of 6 points
Test 6 = 3
Bench Tests:
Muscle power tests = 4 or 5
Fencing arm Muscle strength =4 to 5
Fencing arm ROM = 5
Lower limb muscle strength test to show a reduction of a maximum 20 points.
Trunk bench test, against gravity = 4 or 5
Subjects with double above the knee amputation with short stumps, or incomplete lesions
above T10 or comparable disabilities can be included in this class, provided that the legs
can help in maintaining the sitting balance.
Confirmation of Class is made by Observational Assessment during the competition and
training.

4.5 Class 4
Athletes with good sitting balance with the support of lower limbs and normal fencing arm,
e.g. with lesion below L4 or comparable disability.
Functional tests scores:
Test 1 = 3 point
Test 2 = 3, point
Teat 3, 4 and 5 having a minimum of 8 points. (Test 4 and 5 must be holding a weapon)
Bench test scores:
Trunk = 5

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 55
Hip Adduction = 4 or 5
Plantar Flexion = 4 or 5
Fencing arm scores = 5
Modified Ashworth Scale = 0
All coordination Test scores = 5
Confirmation of Class is made by Observational Assessment during the competition and
training.

CATEGORIES
Currently at official IWF competitions, the Sport Classes are combined into the following
three categories for each event:

 Category A: Sport Classes 3 and 4.

 Category B: Sport Class 2
 Category C: Sport Classes 1A and 1B

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 56
Appendix TWO
1 Non-Eligible Impairment Types for all Athletes
Examples of Non-Eligible Impairments include, but are not limited to the following:
 Pain;
 Hearing impairment;
 Low muscle tone;
 Hypermobility of joints;
 Joint instability, such as unstable shoulder joint, recurrent dislocation of a joint;
 Impaired muscle endurance;
 Impaired motor reflex functions;
 Impaired cardiovascular functions;
 Impaired respiratory functions;
 Impairment metabolic functions; and
 Tics and mannerisms, stereotypes and motor perseveration.

2 Health Conditions that are not Underlying Health

Conditions for all Athletes
A number of Health Conditions do not lead to an Eligible Impairment and are not
Underlying Health Conditions. An Athlete who has a Health Condition (including,
but not limited to, one of the Health Conditions listed in the above, but who does
not have an Underlying Health Condition will not be eligible to compete in IWAS
Wheelchair Fencing.
Health Conditions that primarily cause pain; primarily cause fatigue; primarily cause
joint hypermobility or hypotonia; or are primarily psychological or psychosomatic in
nature do not lead to an Eligible Impairment.
Examples of Health Conditions that primarily cause pain include myofacial pain-
dysfunction syndrome, fibromyalgia or complex regional pain syndrome.
An example of a Health Condition that primarily causes fatigue is chronic fatigue
syndrome.
An example of a Health Condition that primarily causes hypermobility or hypotonia
is Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Examples of Health Conditions that are primarily psychological or psychosomatic in
nature include conversion disorders or post-traumatic stress disorder.

IWF Rules for competition. Book 4 – Classification Rules. Version: February 2018 57