Developing HR Strategy: May 2010 Issue 32
Developing HR Strategy: May 2010 Issue 32
HR Strategy
May 2010
Issue 32
Editorial Editorial
Policy Advisory Board
The aim of this journal is to publish Chris Brewster
cutting-edge articles on human Professor of International Human
resources to inform best practice, Resources, Henley Management College
policy and theory in the field.
Duncan Brown
Its brief is interpreted widely and covers Director, Reward Services,
issues relating to people resourcing, Institute for Employment Studies
learning and development, employment
Jean-Marie Hiltrop
relations, rewards and benefits and
Visiting Professor at the Copenhagen
human resources strategy, as well as
Business School, specialising in International
some global and comparative issues.
Human Resource Management and Change
Editorial policy is to commission
Andrew Mayo
research-led pieces, case studies and
President of the HR Society; Director of
debates on policy from experts in
Mayo Learning International; Professor of
the field. The Editor also welcomes
Human Capital Management, Middlesex
unsolicited articles from human
University
resources and employment researchers,
practitioners and consultants. Please send Sonia McKay
a 200-word synopsis and we will send Professor of European Socio-Legal Studies,
you a copy of our Notes for Contributors. Working Lives Research Institute, London
Metropolitan University
Our aim is to encourage discussion
between you and the authors or between Brian Willey
you and your fellow subscribers. Visiting Fellow, Kingston University and
Chartered Fellow of the CIPD
We are always looking for ways to
improve our service to you and to ensure Chief Editor
that we cater for all your information Linda Holbeche
requirements. It is your views that will Director, The Holbeche Partnership
have the most influence on the future Editor
development of our products. So if you Gillian Fraser
could spare a few moments, let us know
what you think and whether you have any
suggestions for articles or features that
you would like to see in future issues.
Please e-mail your comments and
suggestions to me at:
[Link]@[Link]
Published by Wolters Kluwer (UK) Limited, 145 London Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT2 6SR. Tel: 020 8247 1175, Fax: 020 8547 2637
Website: [Link]. E-mail: info@[Link].
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer (UK) Limited All rights reserved. UP/DHRS-MI10032 ISSN 1745-9966
Content Director: Michèle Wheaton. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publishers. Although great care has been taken in the compilation and preparation of Croner’s Human Resources and
Employment Review to ensure accuracy, the publishers cannot in any circumstances accept responsibility for errors or omissions or advice given in this publication. Subscribers should be aware that
only Acts of Parliament and Statutory Instruments have the force of law and that only the courts can authoritatively interpret the law. Crown copyright material reproduced with the permission of
the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Design: Wolters Kluwer (UK) Limited
Printed by: Hobbs the Printers, Southampton S040 3WX
Editorial
It has been interesting, if sad, to note how much the relevant in today’s fast changing context. The authors outline
economic crisis and its causes have called into question the components of effective descriptions and specifications.
the nature of professionalism, together with the role and
Performance management systems and creating training
reputation of professionals and professional bodies. As
and development processes are other “basics” which HR
Professor Colin Coulson-Thomas points out, companies
must get right if they are to enable improved individual,
that fail invariably employ professionals. The banks that
team and organisational effectiveness. Target-setting is the
were bailed out during the banking crisis were advised by
focus of the article by Cranfield’s Professor Mike Bourne and
professionals and audited by professionals. Have these people
Dr Monica Franco-Santos. They report on their two-year
shown the foresight and competence one might reasonably
study of performance target-setting practices where they
expect from highly-paid experts? Colin argues that we need
found that poor target-setting is surprisingly common in UK
a new definition of professionalism that is “fit” for the 21st
organisations despite the fact that it results in wasted effort,
century and that if professional bodies do not take a lead in
motivation and resource. The authors provide some practical
creating this, it is likely that other networks will.
and straightforward suggestions as to how target-setting can
What does this mean for the HR profession in particular? For be improved.
example, take the role played by reward systems in triggering
So, getting the basics right is the bedrock of professionalism.
the economic crisis. Why did some HR professionals stand by
Well-designed and implemented, these processes are the
while huge sums were paid out in bonuses and commissions
building blocks of organisational flexibility and effectiveness
for bringing into organisations what would prove to be time
and should act as a springboard to high performance.
bombs? Is HR a mere pawn in the corporate game or could
HR exercise much stronger influence on business conduct If you have views about any of the topics featured, or
and leadership practice? Of course HR strategists must be examples of good practice or key learning points from your
the shapers and leaders of better practice. But if HR is to organisation, we would be pleased to hear from you.
win the licence to challenge and lead, the HR basics must be Contact Gillian Fraser at [Link]@[Link] or me at
right. [Link]@[Link]
Developing HR Strategy
Contents
Late last year, the BBC decided to publish online the pay Governance reforms in financial services following the
and expenses details of its top 100 or so managers. After Walker Review and in line with the FSA’s new pay code will
all the previous furore over MP’s expenses, some HR and also increase the amounts of reward information that the
PR directors might look aghast at such a move, seemingly banks will have to publish.
an open invitation for press and public criticism. Yet, were
the BBC being foolhardy or forward-thinking? Internally: minimum understanding
But the communications issue is not just an external
Externally: minimum communications one. Reward and HR directors in one recent survey rated
Three fundamental principles have driven reward policy poor reward communications as a greater risk even than
and practice in UK employers over the last 20 years: over-leveraged incentive plans of the type that operate in
market-driven, performance-related and individualised investment banking and contributed to the generation of
rewards, all of which have relied on as high a degree of the financial crisis.
individual confidentiality as possible. The underlying,
The research review completed for our forthcoming book
generally unspoken approach to pay communication has
on reward effectiveness is pretty depressing for people like
been: don’t do it.
me, who make a living by designing new reward schemes
In more than half of UK employers, employees are strongly for clients. It shows that no type of pay, bonus or benefits
encouraged not to discuss details of pay and reward with plan is universally successful or unsuccessful. Rather, if
colleagues, which in some cases, primarily in banking, is people understand, trust and believe that a new scheme is
contractually enforced. And beyond the required executive going to work, then it is very likely that it will work: a self-
remuneration reporting and in recruitment advertising, fulfilling prophecy. What matter are process and practice,
outside of the public sector, reward details are almost not plan and policy.
never made available externally.
So how are employer practices reflecting the critical role
In 2009, these principles and a policy of no pay of process and communications at the moment? The
communications were brought into serious question. CIPD’s 2009 survey of reward management in more than
The banking crisis and general criticism of the unfairness 500 UK organisations paints a depressing, if accurate,
of prevailing pay and bonus practices, widespread pay picture. The drive for HR to get into the boardroom is
freezes, zero bonus payments and pension scheme apparent, with over 80% discussing reward policies with
closures and reforms have all shaken the edifice of reward directors. But fewer than half bothered to consult line
secrecy. In a recent survey by PwC, only half of the 700 managers about reward changes, and more involved
workers polled accepted that cuts had to be made because outside consultants than talked in advance to employees.
of the tough times. According to partner Jon Terry:
The CIPD survey highlights a particular pattern in
“Pay and promotion freezes, changes to pension schemes, employee reward communications. They get masses when
cuts in recruitment and slashed training budgets, they join an employer, at the very time when they are
combined with poor communications, have eroded the getting loads of information about everything else, such
bonds of trust between employers and their employees.” as learning where the toilets are and how not to lock
(Financial Times, 9.10.09). themselves out of the building.
But then information rapidly declines to a trickle — the feel your own pay is fair if you know very little about
monthly pay slip essentially. Oh, and quite a lot again those processes and how and what other people in your
when you leave. organisation are rewarded?
So it’s like “crash” language courses: very intensive for The arguments have expanded into wider social criticism.
a short period, yet a few weeks later, you can hardly As the Labour MP George Mudie asked a bank chief
remember what language it was. The result? According executive during the Treasury Select Committee Inquiry
to the CIPD, pay and reward is a bigger cause of into the banking crisis last year, “for all that we need
dissatisfaction at work at the moment than job security, incentives, why does the cleaner get 9% and the chief
and only 10% of employees feel fully informed. executive 150%? If there was some morality in it, we
would not operate in this way”.
The one glimmer of hope in the CIPD data? Twenty three
per cent of employers were providing or considering Value
total rewards statements for employees. IES recently
The second issue is that of value. Increasing numbers
investigated the state of reward communications further,
of employers are adopting total reward and flexible
carrying out a survey among IES research members and
benefits approaches in an effort to secure greater
discussing the subject at a network meeting, including
employee engagement from a workforce with diverse
employers such as Shell, the BBC, Cabinet Office, Civil
needs, but without increasing their rewards costs. The
Aviation Authority and Eversheds LLP. Communicating the
cost pressures of the last 12 months if anything appear
total value of the reward package to employees was rated
to have intensified the trend — why provide an expensive
as the most significant current challenge, and the numbers
fixed pension benefit to a younger employee who does not
using these sorts of statement seems likely to continue to
value it and would rather choose to invest the cost of that
increase.
in an alternative benefit?
But our research also confirms that the HR community
Yet as the recent Employee Benefits survey showed,
is now belatedly waking up to the fact that a zero
the greatest barriers to flexible benefits approaches are
communication reward policy is no longer viable in
no longer primarily tax issues or administration, they
our increasingly technology- and knowledge-driven,
are to do with employee understanding. Do employees
information-rich society.
understand enough about their packages to make the right
“Total reward is all about communications”; “it’s all in the choices? In too many organisations the answer is negative,
communications”, “you simply can’t over-communicate”. holding out the potential for employee misunderstanding
These quotes drawn from HR and reward directors in this and de-motivation, and employers paying to administer
reward research highlight this realisation: that you can not flexible schemes which few employees can take advantage
motivate and engage employees if they do not understand of.
or agree with how you reward them.
Reward communications: opening up
Fairness
At last, the proverbial penny seems to be dropping on
Two issues seem to be at work here. First is the issue of
reward communications. Internally, our research has
fairness, which in thinking on staff motivation and reward
found that the volume of web- and intranet-based
has been subservient to the concepts of the market
communications on pay and total reward statements are
and performance for too long. Towers Perrin found that
all increasing, although just placing reward policy manuals
employees are typically far more concerned with pay
on the intranet as some employers have done does not
fairness and pay relative to others than with absolute
necessarily improve staff understanding or appreciation
levels of pay and, in North America, the Compensation
of their rewards. One employer we know has recently
Roundtable found that perceptions of pay fairness were
reverted to printed total reward statements which they
25 times a more powerful determinant of employee
send to employees’ homes, after finding that few actually
commitment than satisfaction with pay levels compared
looked at the online versions.
to other employers.
Nor does using the web to by-pass line managers with
Yet with pay differentials and pay secrecy growing over
reward information seem like a smart move. Almost two-
recent decades, it is hardly surprising that only around
thirds of the organisations we surveyed rated their line
a third of employees in the UK feel that their pay is fair,
managers’ skills in reward communications as poor and
and a CIPD survey identified pay as the biggest barrier
needing to be improved.
to increasing levels of employee engagement. How
can you believe in and trust a pay setting process and Thankfully we are finding more and more examples
of excellent employee communications in our work. years, engagement levels increased significantly and the
KPMG selected and trained more than 300 Performance firm has won The Sunday Times Best Big Company to Work
Management Leaders in their business to lead on reward For award for two of the last three years.
management and communications and the results And externally, forward-thinking employers such as
have been impressive. Staff perceptions of reward and McDonalds are openly and positively communicating
recognition increased by 23% over the following two their total reward packages to address common
misconceptions about working in the services sector, and The research referred to will be published later this year in a
successfully supporting their recruitment drive and growing new book, Evidence-based Reward Management by Michael
employment brand and reputation. Eighty per cent of their Armstrong, Duncan Brown and Peter Reilly.
staff feel they are recognised and respected for their work,
and 84% are committed to their organisation. Not bad for a
McJob indeed. Points to ponder
These organisations are not alone. According to the Hay • What help do your line managers need to be able
Group’s research, Fortune magazine’s Most Admired to communicate well about reward?
Companies do a better job than the rest of us at • Do you know what key segments of your
communicating their reward programmes. workforce value in terms of rewards?
The key suggestions made at our research network meeting • What information do employees need to help
to improve your reward communications were as follows. them understand enough about their packages to
make the right choices when it comes to flexible
Listen and engage with managers and staff, do not
benefits?
assume; many large employers seem to be regularly
surveying and polling employee opinions and it is
important to cover their views on rewards as part of this
process. Duncan Brown is Director of Reward Services at
the Institute for Employment Studies, a leading
Leverage your leaders and train your line managers;
independent think tank and research body on
leaders have to be seen to be practicing what they
employment and HR issues. He has more than 20
preach on reward and they have a major influence on
years’ experience in reward consulting with firms
employee behaviour, while line managers are the key
including PricewaterhouseCoopers and Towers
conduit for reward policies and have to understand and
Perrin. He also spent five years as Assistant
be confident with reward issues.
Director General at the Chartered Institute of
Closely analyse your audiences and segment your media
Personnel and Development.
and messages to suit; look at reward issues from their
perspective, rather than your own more specialist one. His clients have included major private sector
companies such as BP and Pfizer, government
Be open and honest and always use face-to-face
departments such as the Cabinet Office, local
methods as a key component in the communications of
authorities and not-for-profit organisations
any reward change exercise.
such as the RNLI, ACCA and the United Nations.
“Don’t use the manual to sell the car”; in other words
Duncan is a leading commentator on HR issues,
make sure people understand the rationale for what you
who has published numerous reports, articles
are doing, as well as the detailed mechanics; there needs
and books. He recently completed a new book on
to be an emotional engagement with reward issues, not
reward effectiveness.
just an intellectual one.
Duncan has appeared on BBC TV breakfast
“You can’t over-communicate”.
and evening news, as well as Radio 4’s Today
That was how one of our network meeting participants programme . He advises and sits on a number
summed up the current progress but there is a requirement of remuneration committees including at
to go much further on reward communications. Most of English Heritage, the ACCA and Christian Aid.
us have employee surveys already, and with more regular He has participated on government taskforces
and targeted reward communications for employees, and concerned with pensions and human capital
a lot more line manager involvement and training, we reporting. Human Resources magazine voted him
can all progress towards building perceptions of the sorts at number five in its listing of the most influential
of rewarding and engaging workplaces that we aspire to practitioners in UK HR in 2008.
create. And if we extend this openness externally, we can
Duncan has an MA from
more clearly illustrate the benefits of working for our
Cambridge University,
organisation, to potential recruits and to society more
an MBA from the London
widely.
Business School and is a
“Communications is the real work of leadership” according Chartered Fellow of the
to Harvard professor Nitin Nohria. It is also the real work of CIPD.
reward and HR professionals.
Job descriptions and person specifications are the Well-written job descriptions provide clarity to the job-
building blocks of organisations. It is argued here that, in holder regarding the following.
striving for efficiency and cost reduction, HR functions
Purpose. The reason that people are employed is
have neglected the basis on which high performance
to produce output, with the underlying goal being
is established, namely; by creating the dynamic link
to create economic value. The purpose is a high
between jobs and people.
level statement of why the job exists and its link to
what really matters to the organisation; be that cost
The job description reduction, improvement in quality/service or the
When jobs have clearly defined accountabilities; when development of new approaches.
Responsibility. Unless employees know clearly what D elegated decision rights. Job-holders need to know
they are responsible for producing from their work the “elbow-room” that they have to work within. They
the organisation cannot achieve its goals. The key need to know the decisions that they can make and
responsibility areas (KRAs) are the broad areas of the those that need to be referred to others.
organisation for which the job-holder has responsibility.
Accountability. This is a more specific term than Job descriptions and performance
responsibility and relates to outputs. Put simply, management systems
accountability is what you can be held to account for. A job description sets out the boundaries of the job
It is what you own. Put brutally, it is what you can be and is an essential element in the annual performance
fired for not doing. A factory manager is responsible management system. Performance management needs to
for the production of product from within the factory start with the boundaries and accountabilities being clear.
but is likely to be accountable for the cost, quality From this it is possible to complete the job specification
and timeliness of delivery. In high performance by setting targets and specifying the resource allocation.
organisations, accountabilities are not shared but others
Objectivity and transparency is paramount in any
can help in the achievement of these.
performance management system. Systems that are
Resources. This describes the resources that the
transparent and meaningful include the following:
job-holder is responsible for or uses to achieve his or
her aims. Resources can include assets, people and P erformance measures. Measurements that provide
information as well as equipment and tools. indicators that you are on track and building and
P roblems encountered. This describes the type of driving value for the organisation. Performance
problems and the critical incidents that are faced. measures provide clarity and objectivity and promote
As jobs increase in size and scope, the problems that teamwork.
have to be dealt with move from being predictable and T argets. Targets set clear goals and give employees
concrete to new and abstract. direction. Targets are powerful communication tools,
S cope for innovation and change. This describes informing the whole organisation of the expectations
the requirement for initiating, creating change and of levels of performance to achieve success. Targets
innovating. While some freedom to initiate change can also be used as an employee motivation tool in a
may exist within all jobs, not all job-holders have the job. However, it is important to define what type of
discretion to make significant changes, to innovate target is being set. These range from big audacious
or to ensure that creative ideas are implemented. goals, through stretch targets to highly achievable
As jobs increase in size and scope, there is greater incremental improvement targets.
opportunity to identify breakthrough innovations and Constraints and resources. While the job description
developments. sets out the broad resources available to the job-
I nternal interaction. This describes the requirement holder, the actual budget or headcount or database
for interacting internally with others across the total information can change over time. A performance cycle
organisation and the degree to which it is necessary to should start by defining the inputs and resources that
influence others in order to deliver on accountabilities. need to be utilised to provide a return.
In many jobs individuals tend to interact with others
to deliver outputs that are localised. As jobs increase Job descriptions and person
in size and scope there is a greater requirement to specifications
collaborate, influence and build relationships within The job description provides clarity as to the outputs of
an extensive network to deliver outputs that are the job. When these are clear, it is possible to specify the
international or even global. inputs needed and the personal requirements including
E xternal interaction. This describes the requirement the necessary skills and knowledge.
for interacting externally with others. This includes
A person specification is the matching side of the job
consumers, customers, suppliers and significant
specification. When these tools work in harmony they
external organisations, and other stakeholder groups.
provide the basis for:
In many jobs there are clearly defined external contacts
and clear remits such as suppliers and customers. At the o rganisational development and design solutions
higher levels, jobs have to influence national, regional a ssessment, selection, and hiring processes/systems
or international organisations or authorities whose s uccession plans/programmes
policies may have a significant impact on business p erformance evaluation
results. t raining and development systems.
However, when job descriptions are bland or written “team-player”. These generic metaphors can cause
for the sole purpose of job evaluation, the person misalignment between the job and the person with
specifications can be neglected or default to broad or negative and expensive results for the organisation.
unspecific personal traits or requirements.
areas your organisation needs to address in order to be 3. Success map: A success map is a very simple visual
perceived as successful. tool. It links the objectives together, so that higher level
2. Strategic objectives clarification/selection: Once objectives are represented as being delivered through
the stakeholders’ expectations are identified, the the attainment of lower level objectives. Expressing
next step is to express these expectations as strategic the goals in this way will provide you with a powerful
objectives. Strategic objectives are clear statements of communication tool explaining what is to be achieved
what the organisation needs to achieve. They must be and why. By developing a success map you will be
few in number and they should address the different able to explain the goals to the whole organisation,
stakeholders’ “requirements” (such as: what do our as well as being able to show where each part of the
customers, and investors, or employees require?). organisation contributes to achieving these goals.
4. Objectives prioritisation: Not everything can be
achieved at once, so you will need to prioritise. Most
companies we investigated tried to achieve too much. It
is much better to prioritise and deliver fewer objectives
than fail to deliver on too wide a range of goals. The
focus will help employees too, as they will be very clear
about what is important in the coming period.
5. Operationalisation: This means designing the
appropriate performance measures. How you define
the measure will drive behaviour. You therefore have
to define the measures so that they i) reflect the goals
the organisation needs to achieve and ii) encourage the
right behaviour from those responsible for delivering
the goals.
6. Data collection: This step is often overlooked. You
will need to collect timely and accurate information
as a basis for setting your targets. Information is never
perfect, but it does have to be consistent and reliable
enough to be fit for purpose.
7. Data analysis: This is fundamental to the process. First,
you will have to forecast drawing on your knowledge
of the past (through data collection and analysis)
and your knowledge of the future to project what is
going to happen. Second, you will have to analyse the
capability of your processes. Are the processes capable
of delivering the forecast? Most companies forecast,
but fewer reassess their capabilities; a common reason
for targets not being delivered.
8. Set targets: Based on the previous seven steps, it is at
this point you set the target. Judgment is required and
you will need to assess the risk of getting the target
wrong. This is also where most of the organisations we
studied stopped, but this is not the end of the process.
9. Action plan design: An action plan is required covering
all the projects and changes to the organisation that
are needed to ensure the target is reached. This may
include training and development, new processes, new
IT systems, new products or ways of working with your
customers. Your targets are based on the activities you
have made in this plan so it is important to schedule
their delivery. You are also assuming that the plan is
delivered, so failing to implement the plan has a direct
impact on achieving the targets.
Position Department
Company
Address
Town Postcode
Telephone Fax
Number of employees
Your annual subscription will begin when we send you the next published edition
and will continue for six issues. Price £204.95*
Payment Options:
I enclose a cheque for £ made payable to Wolters Kluwer (UK) Ltd
If your card billing address is different from the one given, please send it on a separate sheet.
*Delete as necessary.
Signature 7 Date / /
This document is not valid unless signed.
Request more
details now!
It's easy.
[Link]/plus
020 8247 1632
Wolters Kluwer (UK) Ltd. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
for general insurance business.
[Link]