Demand, Supply and Manufacturing Planning and Control
Demand, Supply and Manufacturing Planning and Control
Cross-Functional
Applications
OM in the Organization Chart
Finance Operations / Supply Marketing
Chain
Director
• Locational--transportation
• Exchange--retailing
• Storage--warehousing
• Physiological--health care
• Informational--telecommunications
What is a Service and What is a Good?
• “If you drop it on your foot, it won’t hurt
you.” (Good or service?)
Quality
Operations
Flexibility Speed
Management
Master production
scheduling Front End
Material and
capacity plans
Manufacturing
Increase Production Capacity
Strategy
Decisions on Processes
and Infrastructure Build New Factory
Competitive Dimensions
• Cost or Price
– Make the Product or Deliver the Service Cheap
• Quality
– Make a Great Product or Deliver a Great Service
• Delivery Speed
– Make the Product or Deliver the Service Quickly
• Delivery Reliability
– Deliver It When Promised
• Coping with Changes in Demand
– Change Its Volume
• Flexibility and New Product Introduction Speed
– Change It
• Other Product-Specific Criteria
– Support It
Dealing with Trade-offs
For example, if we reduce costs by reducing product quality
inspections, we might reduce product quality.
Cost
For example, if we improve
customer service problem
solving by cross-training Flexibility Delivery
personnel to deal with a
wider-range of problems, Quality
they may become less
efficient at dealing with
commonly occurring
problems.
Order Qualifiers and Winners
Defined
Outputs
Inputs
Total Factor Productivity
or
= Goods and services produced
All resources used
Partial Factor Productivity
• Output .
Labor + Capital + Energy
or
• Output .
Labor + Capital + Materials
Example of Productivity Measurement
Manufacturing Process
Selection and Design
&
Process Capability
Definition of Process
Characteristics of Process
Strategic Process Decisions
Decision on Process Structures
Different kinds of Processes
• Conversion (ex. Iron to steel)
• Process Analysis
• Process Flowcharting
• Types of Processes
• Process Variation
• Process Capability
Process Analysis Terms
• Process: Is any part of an organization that takes
inputs and transforms them into outputs
• Cycle Time: Is the average successive time between
completions of successive units
• Utilization: Is the ratio of the time that a resource is
actually activated relative to the time that it is
available for use
Process Flowcharting Defined
Single-stage Process
Stage 1
Multi-stage Process
Stage 1 Stage 2
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics
Process Performance Metrics (Cont..)
• Throughput rate = 1 .
Cycle time
Cycle Time Example
Assignable variation
Example: A poorly trained
is caused by factors
employee that creates
that can be clearly variation in finished
identified and product output.
possibly managed
Incremental Incremental
Cost of Cost of
Variability Variability
Zero Zero
• Process limits
• Specification limits
• Dynamic in Nature
• Consider Uncertainty
• Rely on Information contained in Past Data
• Applied to various time horizons
– short term
– medium term forecasts
– long term forecasts
Steps in the Forecasting Process
• Determine the Use of the Forecast
• Select the Items to be Forecasted
• Determine a Suitable Time Horizon
• Select an appropriate Set of Forecasting Models
• Gather Relevant Data
• Conduct the Analysis
• Validate the Model - Assess its Accuracy
• Make the Forecast
• Implement the Results
Independent Demand:
What a firm can do to manage it?
• Long-range forecast
– > 2 years
• New product planning
Design Qualitative
of system Methods
Characteristics of Long Term Forecasts
• Aggregate units
Time
Types of Forecasts
• Qualitative (Judgmental)
• Quantitative
– Time Series Analysis
– Causal Relationships
– Simulation
JUDGMENT METHODS (QUALITATIVE)
• Judgment methods rely on the opinions of experts, or on
the judgment and experience of people in the best
position to know.
• Much of market research is qualitative.
– Surveys of customer preferences and intentions to buy
Seasonal Cyclical
Rules for Time-Series Forecasting
Week
A longer averaging period soothes the fluctuations.
Simple Moving Average Problem (1)
750
700 Note how the 3-
650 Week is smoother
600 than the Demand,
550
500 and 6-Week is even
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 smoother
Week
Simple Moving Average Problem (2) Data
(20*0.1)+(23*0.2)+(21*0.3)+(24*0.4)=22.5
Weighted Moving Average Formula
Ft = w 1 A t -1 + w 2 A t - 2 + w 3 A t -3 + ...+ w n A t - n
n
wt = weight given to time period “t”
occurrence (weights must add to one)
w
i=1
i =1
Weighted Moving Average Problem (1) Data
Question: Given the weekly demand and weights, what is the forecast for the 4th
period or Week 4?
Note that the weights place more emphasis on the most recent data,
that is time period “t-1”
Weighted Moving Average Problem (1) Solution
F4 = 0.5(720)+0.3(678)+0.2(650)=693.4
Weighted Moving Average Problem (2) Data
F5 = (0.1)(755)+(0.2)(680)+(0.7)(655)= 672
Other Time Series Methods
• EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING is a complex form of weighted moving
averages. It is good for trends and cyclical data.
– It is the most frequently used formal forecasting method because of its
simplicity and the small amount of data needed to support it.
• Double and Triple Exponential Smoothing are used for highly fluctuating
data.
• BOX JENKINS
• This is probably the most complex but often the most accurate of the
time-series methods for all data patterns.
• If you really want to know: It is named after the statisticians George Box and Gwilym
Jenkins. It applies autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to find
the best fit of a time series to past values of this time series, in order to make
forecasts.
Exponential Smoothing Model
850
800
Demand
De m and
750
700 0.1
650
600 0.6
550
500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Week
Exponential Smoothing Problem (2) Data
F1=820+(0.5)(820-820)=820 F3=820+(0.5)(775-820)=797.75
Sales Demand
1994
170
SI Adjusted
Forecast
150
Overall
Average
130
110
90
70
50
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Evaluating Forecast Accuracy
A
t=1
t - Ft
1 standard deviation 1.25 MAD
MAD =
n
40
n
Note that by itself, the
A
t=1
t - Ft
40 MAD only lets us know
MAD = = = 10 the mean error in a set of
n 4 forecasts
Evaluating Forecast Accuracy
Mean Absolute Deviation - MAD
MSE = 4.71
RMSE = 2.17
Tracking Signal Formula
600.00
500.00
400.00
Volum e
Actual
300.00
Forecast
200.00
100.00
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
Tim e
Key to Winters method
• Winters is an exponential smoothing method
Independent Demand:
Finished Goods
A Dependent Demand:
Raw Materials,
Component parts,
B(4) C(2) Sub-assemblies, etc.
Make-to-Stock (MTS)
Short Finished Goods
Components/Subassemblies
Lead Time
a = y - bx
xy - n(y)(x)
b= 2 2
x - n(x )
Simple Linear Regression Problem Data
Week Sales
1 150
2 157
3 162
4 166
5 177
Answer: First, using the linear regression formulas, we can
compute “a” and “b”
b=
xy - n( y)(x) 2499 - 5(162.4)(3) 63
= = 6.3
x - n(x )
2 2
55 5(9 ) 10
155 Forecast
150
145
140
135
1 2 3 4 5
Period
Statistical Assumptions of Multiple
Linear Regression
• The Error Term (the residual i) is Normally
Distributed
• There is no Serial Correlation Among Error Terms
• Magnitude of the Error Term is Independent of the
Size of Any of the Independent Variables - Xi
• Assumptions Can be Tested Through Analyses of the
Residuals - i
Major Statistical Problems of Multiple
Linear Regression
• Multicolinarity
• Use of Time-Lagged Independent Variables
• Both of These Problems Result in Models with
Potentially Valid Predictions, but the Reliability of
the Coefficients is Questionable
Finding The Right Technique
1. Select a variety of forecasting techniques
2. Use historic data with each technique to forecast demand for the
most recent known demand period.
3. See which forecasting technique gives you the most accurate
forecast.
4. Use that technique to forecast the unknown period of demand.
5. Repeat this selection process each time you need to forecast
demand. Use the latest demand data.
This process is called FOCUS FORECASTING.
Forecasting As a Process
The forecast process itself, typically done on a monthly basis,
consists of structured steps. They often are facilitated by
someone who might be called a demand manager, forecast
analyst, or demand/supply planner.
Finalize Review by
Revise
and Operating
Communicate Committee forecasts
6 5 4
Some Principles For The Forecasting Process
Answer: c. 0 to 1
Question Bowl
Answer: e. 0
Question Bowl
Answer: b. 75 (Y=25+5(10)=75)
Question Bowl
Inventory Control
TOPICS TO BE
DISCUSSED
• Inventory System Defined
• Inventory Costs
• Single-Period Inventory Model
• Multi-Period Inventory Models: Basic Fixed-Order
Quantity Models
• Multi-Period Inventory Models: Basic Fixed-Time
Period Model
• Independent vs. Dependent Demand
• Miscellaneous Systems and Issues
Inventory System Defined
• Inventory is the stock of any item or resource used in an
organization and can include: raw materials, finished
products, component parts, supplies, and work-in-
process
• An inventory system is the set of policies and controls
that monitor levels of inventory and determines what
levels should be maintained, when stock should be
replenished, and how large orders should be
• Inventory management system strikes a balance
between inventory investment and customer service
Purposes of Inventory
1. To maintain independence of operations
– Speculation: Changing Costs Over Time
– Costs of Maintaining Control System
2. To meet variation in product demand (i.e. Demand Uncertainty) by
smoothing to account for seasonality and/or Bottlenecks
3. To allow flexibility in production scheduling
4. To provide a safeguard for variation in raw material delivery time
(i.e. uncertainty in delivery lead-times)
5. To take advantage of economic purchase-order size or Economies
of Scale
Characteristics of Inventory Systems
• Demand
– May Be Known or Uncertain
– May be Changing or Unchanging in Time
• Lead Times - time that elapses from placement of
order until it’s arrival. Can assume known or
unknown.
• Review Time. Is system reviewed periodically or is
system state known at all times?
Characteristics of Inventory Systems
• Treatment of Excess Demand.
• Backorder all excess demand
• Lose all excess demand
• Backorder some and lose some
• Inventory who’s quality changes over time
• perishability
• obsolescence
Types of Inventory (WRT Operational Stage)
Raw material
Purchased but not processed
Work-in-process
Undergone some change but not completed
A function of cycle time for a product
Maintenance/repair/operating (MRO)
Necessary to keep machinery and
processes productive
Finished goods
Completed product awaiting shipment
Types of Inventories (WRT Order Stage)
• Pipeline
– Inventories in transit
• Speculative
– Goods purchased in anticipation of price increases
• Regular/Cyclical/Seasonal
– Inventories held to meet normal operating needs
• Safety
– Extra stocks held in anticipation of demand and lead time
uncertainties
• Obsolete/Dead Stock
– Inventories that are of little or no value due to being out of date,
spoiled, damaged, etc.
Nature of Demand
• Perpetual demand
– Continues well into the foreseeable future
• Seasonal demand
– Varies with regular peaks and valleys throughout the year
• Lumpy demand Accurately forecasting
– Highly variable (3 Mean) demand is singly the
• Regular demand most important factor
– Not highly variable (3 < Mean) in good inventory
management
• Terminating demand
– Demand goes to 0 in foreseeable future
• Derived demand
– Demand is determined from the demand of another item of which it
is a part
Inventory Costs
• Holding (or carrying) costs
– the costs of holding or “carrying” inventory over time
(i.e. costs for storage, handling, insurance, etc.)
• Setup (or production change) costs
– cost to prepare a machine or process for
manufacturing an order (i.e. cost for arranging
specific equipment setups, etc.)
• Ordering costs
– the costs of placing an order and receiving goods.
• Shortage costs
– Costs of canceling an order, etc.
Relevant Inventory Costs
• Holding Costs - Costs proportional to the
quantity of inventory held.
• Includes:
1. Physical Cost of Space (3%)
2. Taxes and Insurance (2 %)
3. Breakage Spoilage and Deterioration (1%)
4. Opportunity Cost of alternative investment. (18%)
Here these holding issues total: 24%
• Therefore, in inventory systems, the holding cost
would be taken as:
– h .24*Cost of product
Holding Costs
Cost (and range)
as a Percent of
Category Inventory Value
Housing costs (building rent or 6% (3 - 10%)
depreciation, operating costs, taxes,
insurance)
Material handling costs (equipment lease or 3% (1 - 3.5%)
depreciation, power, operating cost)
Labor cost 3% (3 - 5%)
Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, 11% (6 - 24%)
and insurance on inventory)
Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3% (2 - 5%)
Overall carrying cost 26%
Holding Costs
Cost (and range)
as a Percent of
Category Inventory Value
Housing costs (building rent or 6% (3 - 10%)
depreciation, operating costs, taxes,
insurance)
Material handling costs (equipment lease or 3% (1 - 3.5%)
depreciation, power, operating cost)
Labor cost 3% (3 - 5%)
Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, 11% (6 - 24%)
and insurance on inventory)
Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3% (2 - 5%)
Overall carrying cost 26%
Relevant Costs (continued)
• Ordering Cost (or Production Cost).
Includes both fixed and variable components
slope = c
Cs
Service level =
Cs + Co
Single Period Example
Average demand = = 120 papers/day
Standard deviation = = 15 papers
Cs = cost of shortage = $1.25 - $.70 = $.55
Co = cost of overage = $.70 - $.30 = $.40
Cs
Service level =
Cs + Co
Service
.55 level
= 57.8%
.55 + .40
.55
= = .578 = 120
.95 Optimal stocking level
Single Period Example
Q4
Q2
On-hand inventory
Q1 P
Q3
Time
A Fixed Interval Inventory Reorder System
A Fixed Order Quantity Inventory
Reorder System
Fixed-Period (P) Example
3 jackets are back ordered No jackets are in stock
It is time to place an order Target value = 50
Number
of units
on hand Q Q Q
R
2. Your start using L L
them up over time. 3. When you reach down to a
Time level of inventory of R, you place
R = Reorder point your next Q sized order.
Q = Economic order quantity
L = Lead time
Inventory Usage Over Time
quantity = Q on hand
(maximum
Q
inventory
level) 2
Minimum
inventory
0
Time
Independent vs. Dependent Demand
Dependent Demand
(Derived demand
items for
component parts,
E(1 subassemblies,
) raw materials, etc)
Component parts
Inventory Models for Independent
Demand
Minimum
total cost
Annual cost
Holding cost
D
= (S)
Q D
Annual setup cost = S
Q
D
Annual setup cost = S
The EOQ Model Q
Q
Annual holding cost = H
2
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Order quantity
= (Holding cost per unit per year)
2
Q
= (H)
2
D
Annual setup cost = S
The EOQ Model Annual holding cost =
Q
Q
H
2
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
D Q
S = H
Q 2
Solving for Q*
2DS = Q2H
Q2 = 2DS/H
Q* = 2DS/H
An EOQ Example
Determine optimal number of needles to order
D = 1,000 units
S = $10 per order
H = $.50 per unit per year
2DS
Q* =
H
2(1,000)(10)
Q* = = 40,000 = 200 units
0.50
An EOQ Example
Determine optimal number of needles to order
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order
H = $.50 per unit per year
Expected Demand D
number of = N = =
orders Order quantity Q*
1,000
N= = 5 orders per year
200
An EOQ Example
Determine optimal number of needles to order
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year
H = $.50 per unit per year
Number of working
Expected days per year
time between = T =
orders N
250
T= = 50 days between orders
5
An EOQ Example
Determine optimal number of needles to order
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year
H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days
D Q
TC = S + H
Q 2
1,500 200
TC = ($10) + ($.50) = $75 + $50 = $125
200 2
D Q
TC = S + H
Q 2 Only 2% less
1,500 244.9 than the total
TC = ($10) + ($.50) cost of $125
244.9 2
when the
TC = $61.24 + $61.24 = $122.48 order quantity
was 200
Basic Fixed-Order Quantity (EOQ) TC=Total annual
cost
Model Formula D =Demand
Total Annual Annual Annual C =Cost per unit
Annual = Purchase + Ordering + Holding Q =Order quantity
Cost Cost Cost Cost S =Cost of placing
an order or setup
cost
R =Reorder point
L =Lead time
H=Annual holding
Q 2
Reorder Point Curve
Q*
Inventory level (units)
Slope = units/day = d
ROP
(units)
Time (days)
Lead time = L
Reorder Points
EOQ answers the “how much” question
The reorder point (ROP) tells “when” to
order
Demand Lead time for a
ROP = per day new order in days
=dxL
D
d = Number of working days in a year
Deriving the EOQ
Using calculus, we take the first derivative of the total
cost function with respect to Q, and set the derivative
(slope) equal to zero, solving for the optimized (cost
minimized) value of Qopt
= 8,000/250 = 32 units
ROP = d x L
= 32 units per day x 3 days = 96 units
EOQ Example (1) Problem Data
Given the information below, what are the EOQ and reorder point?
_
R eorder point, R = d L = 2.74units / day (7days) = 19.18 or 20 u n its
_
R = d L = 27.397 units / day (10 days) = 273.97 or 274 u n its
Place an order for 366 units. When in the course of using the
inventory you are left with only 274 units, place the next order of 366
units.
ABC Analysis
Divides inventory into three classes
based on annual dollar volume
Class A - high annual dollar volume
Class B - medium annual dollar
volume
Class C - low annual dollar volume
Used to establish policies that focus
on the few critical parts and not the
many trivial ones
ABC Classification System
• Items kept in inventory are not of equal
importance in terms of:
– dollars invested 60
% of
– profit potential $ Value 30 A
– sales or usage volume
0 B
% of 30 C
– stock-out penalties Use 60
So, identify inventory items based on percentage of total dollar value, where
“A” items are roughly top 15 %, “B” items as next 35 %, and the lower 50%
are the “C” items
ABC Analysis
Percent of Percent of
Item Number of Annual Annual Annual
Stock Items Volume Unit Dollar Dollar
Number Stocked (units) x Cost = Volume Volume Class
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Count Number of
Number Number
Classification Frequency Counts
of Items of Counts
per Year per Day
Count Number of
Number Number
Classification Frequency Counts
of Items of Counts
per Year per Day
A 2000 12
24,000 96
B 3000 4
12,000 48
C 5000 2
10,000 40
Total Count
Workdays per Year
46,000
250
Counts per Day 184
Count Frequency Methods - Continued
• Zone Method
– used with:
– fixed location system
– work-in-process counts
– in-transit inventory counts
• Location Audit
– verifies location of goods
Cycle Counting - When to Count
• Counts items when errors are likely to have occurred
– when an order is placed
• detects errors when stock is low
– when an order is received
• stock is at its lowest
– when inventory reaches zero
– when an error occurs
• inventory shows negative or there is no stock when
there should be
Cycle Counting Example
5,000 items in inventory, 500 A items, 1,750 B items, 2,750 C
items
Policy is to count A items every month (20 working days), B
items every quarter (60 days), and C items every six months
(120 days)
• Limited access
– locked
– to ensure transactions are completed
• A well trained workforce
– to ensure transactions are completed
– familiar with handling the goods
Technology Applications
• Bar Codes
– paper labels which show a product code
• RF Tags
– Radio Frequency
– do not need to ‘see’ the item
• Reduce recording errors
• Improve transaction speed
Thank You
Session 5
Materials Requirements
Planning
Topics to be Discussed
• Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
• MRP Logic and Product Structure Trees- Develop a
product structure
• Time Fences- MRP Example- Build a gross
requirements plan and a net requirements plan
• Lot Sizing- Determine lot sizes for lot-for-lot, EOQ,
and POQ
• MRP II (Next Class)
• Describe closed-loop MRP(Next Class)
• Describe ERP(Next Class)
Material Requirements Planning
MRP by
BOM Master period report
production schedule
MRP by
date report
Lead times
(Item master file) Planned order
report
Inventory data
Purchase advice
Material
requirement
planning
programs
(computer and Exception reports
Purchasing data software)
Order early or late
or not needed
Aggregate Forecasts
Firm orders
product of demand
from known
plan from random
customers
customers
Aggregate Plan
(Product Groups)
MPS
(Specific End Items)
Bill of Materials (BOM) File
A Complete Product Description
• Materials
• Parts
• Components
• Production sequence
• Modular BOM
– Subassemblies
• Super BOM
– Fractional options
Bills of Material (Product Structure Tree)
1 B(2) C(3)
Question:
How many D’s we need in order
to produce 50 A’s?
B(2) C(1)
• Phantom BOMs
– Describe subassemblies that exist only temporarily
– Are part of another assembly and never go into
inventory
• Low-Level Coding
– Item is coded at the lowest level at which it occurs
– BOMs are processed one level at a time
Time Fences
• Frozen
– No schedule changes allowed within this window
• Moderately Firm
– Specific changes allowed within product groups as
long as parts are available
• Flexible
– Significant variation allowed as long as overall
capacity requirements remain at the same levels
Safety Stock
▶ BOMs, inventory records, purchase and
production quantities may not be perfect
▶ Consideration of safety stock may be prudent
▶ Should be minimized and ultimately
eliminated
▶ Typically built into projected on-hand
inventory
MRP Management
▶ MRP dynamics
▶ Facilitates re-planning when changes occur
▶ System nervousness can result from too
many changes
▶ Time fences put limits on re-planning
▶ Pegging links each item to its parent allowing
effective analysis of changes
MRP Management
▶ MRP limitations
▶ MRP does not do detailed scheduling–it plans
▶ Works best in product-focused, repetitive
environments
▶ Requires fixed lead time and infinite size time
buckets
MRP Outputs
There are two outputs and a variety of messages/reports:
• Output 1 is the "Recommended Production Schedule"
which lays out a detailed schedule of the required
minimum start and completion dates, with quantities, for
each step of the Routing and Bill Of Material required to
satisfy the demand from the Master Production Schedule
(MPS).
• Output 2 is the "Recommended Purchasing Schedule".
This lays out both the dates that the purchased items
should be received into the facility AND the dates that the
Purchase Orders, or Blanket Order Release should occur to
match the production schedules.
Primary MRP Reports
• Action Notices:
– Indicate items that need a production planner’s
attention
– Are created when a planned order needs to be
released, due dates need to be adjusted, or when
there is insufficient lead time for normal
replenishment
– Often require planners to rush or expedite orders
MRP Action Notices
• Action Bucket:
– Is the current period where we take actions such as
releasing, rescheduling, or canceling orders
– A positive quantity in current period’s planned order
row means that an order must be released
Benefits of MRP
The MRP is a framework for providing useful information
for decision makers. The key to realizing the benefits from
any MRP system is the ability of the inventory planner to
use the information well. The specific benefits of MRP
include the following:
• Increased customer service and satisfaction
• Improved utilization of facilities and personnel
• Better inventory planning and scheduling
• Faster response to market changes and shifts
• Reduced inventory levels without reduced customer
service
Benefits of MRP
The MRP is also a very powerful tool since it takes
into consideration changes in certain
assumptions especially under uncertain
conditions, especially when the inputs to the
MRP system change because of the following
realities in the production area:
• Delays in scheduled receipts
• Changes in planned order sizes because of
capacity constraints
• Changes in gross requirements which dictate
changes in lot sizes at sub-component levels
Benefits of MRP
• Gross Requirements
• Scheduled receipts
• Net requirements
Day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A Required 50
Order Placement 50
LT = 1 day
Next, we need to start scheduling the components that make up
“A”. In the case of component “B” we need 4 B’s for each A.
Since we need 50 A’s, that means 200 B’s. And again, we back
the schedule up for the necessary 2 days of lead time.
Day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A R e q u ire d 50
O rd e r P la c e m e n t 50
B R e q u ire d 20 200
O rd e r P la c e m e n t 20 200
LT = 2
Spares
A
4x50=200
B(4) C(2)
Part D: Day 6
B(4) C(2) 40 + 15 spares
1 B(2) C(3)
B(2) C(1)
Question:
When do we start
producing/ordering each part?
(15)
(10) (15)
D(3) E(3) D(1)
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Delivery
date for
final
5 days product
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Start
assembly
for 50 units
of A
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Start
assembly
for 100
units of B
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Start
assembly
for 50 units
of C
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Order 300
units of D
for B’s
process
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Order 50
units of D
for C’s
assembly
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Let’s assume that we need 50 units of A…
Order 50
units of E
for C’s
assembly
Parts-Products
A
B
C
D
E
Session 6
Capacity Planning
Sales & Operations Planning
Key concept of JIT/ ERP
381
MRP Evolution
MRP Schedule Materials
ERP
TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED
▶ Closed-Loop MRP
▶ DRP
▶ MRP II
▶ ERP
▶ Sales and Operations Planning
▶ Capacity Planning, Break Even Analysis,
NPV
▶ JIT, KANBAN
Closed-Loop MRP System
Aggregate Plan
OK?
NO Priority Management Capacity Management
384
Closed Loop MRP
Production Planning
Master Production Scheduling
Material Requirements Planning
Capacity Requirements Planning
No
Realistic? Feedback
Feedback
Yes
Execute:
Capacity Plans
Material Plans
385
Distribution Resource Planning (DRP)
Using dependent demand techniques
through the supply chain
► Expected demand or sales forecasts become
gross requirements
► All other levels are computed
► DRP pulls inventory through the system
► Small and frequent replenishments
386
MRP II
▶ Requirement data can be
enriched by other resources
▶ Generally called MRP II or
Manufacturing Resource Planning
▶ Outputs can include scrap,
packaging waste, effluent,
carbon emissions
▶ Data used by purchasing, production
scheduling, capacity planning, inventory,
warehouse management
387
Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II)
• Goal: Plan and monitor all resources of a
manufacturing firm (closed loop):
– manufacturing
– marketing
– finance
– engineering
• Simulate the manufacturing system
388
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
▶ An extension of the MRP system to tie in
customers and suppliers
1. Allows automation and integration of many
business processes
2. Shares common data bases and business
practices
3. Produces information in real time
▶ Coordinates business from supplier
evaluation to customer invoicing
389
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
▶ ERP modules include
▶ Basic MRP
▶ Finance
▶ Human resources
▶ Supply chain management (SCM)
▶ Customer relationship management (CRM)
▶ Sustainability
390
Enterprise Resource Planning
391
Integration of ERP
392
Typical ERP System
393
ERP Modules-4 Categories
395
Evolution of ERP
396
Integrating ERP and E-Commerce
398
The Cost of ERP Systems
Microsoft US
Infor US SSA
Baan
401
ERP and MRP
402
ERP and MRP
Customer Relationship Management
403
ERP and MRP
Master
Production
Schedule
Inventory Bills of
Management Material
MRP
Work
Orders
Purchasing Routings
and and
Lead Times Lead Times
Table 13.6
404
ERP and MRP
Supply-Chain Management
Vendor Communication
(schedules, EDI, advanced shipping notice,
e-commerce, etc.)
405
Finance/
ERP and MRP
Accounting
Accounts
Receivable
General
Ledger
Accounts
Payable
Payroll
Table 13.6
406
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
409
Reasons to Implement ERP
410
ERP Drawbacks
• Cost
– $250M+ for a Fortune 100 company
• Transition pain
– Implementation resources
– Training
– Resistance to change
411
Resource Planning Across the
Organization
414
Sales and Operations Planning
415
Traditional conflicts between sales and operations
groups must be resolved to reach consensus
417
The Planning Process
Long-range plans (over one year)
Capacity decisions critical to long range plans
Issues:
Research and Development
New product plans
Capital investments
Facility location/expansion
Top
executives Intermediate-range plans (3 to 18 months)
Issues:
Sales and operations planning
Production planning and budgeting
Operations Setting employment, inventory,
managers with subcontracting levels
sales and Analyzing operating plans
operations Short-range plans (up to 3 months)
planning team Scheduling techniques
Issues:
Job assignments
Operations Ordering
managers, Job scheduling
supervisors, Dispatching
foremen Overtime
Part-time help
Responsibility Planning tasks and time horizons
418
Sales and Operations Planning
▶ Coordination of demand forecasts with
functional areas and the supply chain
▶ Typically done by cross-functional teams
▶ Determine which plans are feasible
▶ Limitations must be reflected
▶ Provides warning when resources do not
match expectations
▶ Output is an aggregate plan
419
Sales and Operations Planning
▶ Decisions must be tied to strategic
planning and integrated with all areas of
the firm over all planning horizons
▶ S&OP is aimed at
1. The coordination and integration of the
internal and external resources necessary
for a successful aggregate plan
2. Communication of the plan to those charged
with its execution
420
Sales and Operations Planning
▶ Requires
▶ A logical overall unit for measuring sales and
output
▶ A forecast of demand for an intermediate
planning period in these aggregate terms
▶ A method for determining relevant costs
▶ A model that combines forecasts and costs so
that scheduling decisions can be made for the
planning period
421
Aggregate Planning
422
Demand planning
• Demand management system is the information technology
component of the sales and operations planning (S&OP)
process
• Demand management develops the forecasts used by other
supply chain processes to anticipate sales levels
– Demand management processes must integrate
• Historical forecasts
• Promotional plans
• Pricing changes
• New product introductions
• Forecasts are then used to determine production and
inventory requirements
• Must maintain forecast data consistency across multiple
products and warehouse facilities
423
Production planning
• Production planning uses requirements from demand
management to develop a realistic manufacturing plan
– Must integrate with manufacturing resources and constraints
424
Logistics planning
• Logistics planning integrates overall movement
demand, vehicle availability, and relevant movement
cost into a decision support system that seeks to
minimize overall freight expense
– Analysis suggests ways freight can be shifted among
carriers or consolidated to lower expenses
• Overcomes these problems resulting from individual
perspectives
– Limited economies of scale
– Limited information sharing
– Excessive transportation expense
425
Making S&OP work in an organization
requires senior leadership involvement
426
427
• CAPACITY PLANNING
• BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS
– Single-Product Case
– Multiproduct Case
428
Capacity strategy
Timing of change
Magnitude of change
Capacity Dynamics
Overall Type of Location
level of capacity of
capacity capacity
429
Capacity Planning Process
Develop Quantitative
Forecast
Alternative Factors
Demand
Plans (e.g., Cost)
430
Definition and Measures of Capacity
Capacity: The “throughput,” or number of units a facility can
hold, receive, store, or produce in a period of time.
Effective Capacity a firm can expect to receive given its product
capacity: mix, methods of scheduling, maintenance, and
standards of quality.
Utilization: Actual output as a percent of design capacity. Measure
of planned or actual capacity usage of a facility, work
center, or machine
Actual output as a percent of effective capacity. Measure of
Efficiency:
how well a facility or machine is performing when used.
431
Implications of Capacity Changes
Changes in:
• Sales
• Cash flow
• Quality
• Supply chain
• Human resources
• Maintenance
432
Special Requirements for Making Good
Capacity Decisions
• Forecast demand accurately
• Understanding the technology and capacity
increments
• Finding the optimal operating level (volume)
• Build for change
433
Strategies for Matching Capacity to Demand
1. Making staffing changes (increasing or decreasing
the number of employees)
2. Adjusting equipment and processes – which might
include purchasing additional machinery or selling
or leasing out existing equipment
3. Improving methods to increase throughput;
and/or
4. Redesigning the product to facilitate more
throughput
434
Capacity Bottlenecks
To
Inputs 1 2 3
customers
200/hr 50/hr 200/hr
Figure 8.2
Capacity Bottlenecks
To
Inputs 1 2 3
customers
200/hr 200/hr 200/hr
Figure 8.2
Theory of Constraints
hospital
(dollars per
patient)
hospital hospital
(dollars per
patient)
hospital hospital
(dollars per
patient)
Economies
of scale
l
patient)
Economies
of scale
l
patient)
Economies Diseconomie
of scale s of scale
443
Break-Even Analysis
444
Breakeven Chart
Variable cost
Volume (units/period)
445
Net Present Value
F = future value
P = present value
r = interest rate
N = number of years
F
P
(i 1) N
446
NPV in a More Convenient Form
Present value of $1.00
Year 5% 6% 7% 8%
F
1 0.952 0.943 0.935 0.857 P
(r 1)
N
2 0.907 0.890 0.873 0.857
447
Managing Existing Capacity
448
Just-in-time
449
Just-in-time
450
Examples Of Waste
451
Some Elements Of JIT
452
Kaizen
• Continuous improvement
• Requires total employment involvement
• The essence of JIT is the willingness of workers to
• spot quality problems,
• halt production when necessary,
• generate ideas for improvement,
• analyze problems, and
• perform different functions
454
Pull Production System
455
A Single-Card Kanban System
456
A Two-Card System
1. When the number of tickets on the withdrawal kanban
reaches a predetermined level, a worker takes these
tickets to the store location.
457
A Two-Card System (Cont.)
4. When a specified number of production ordering
kanbans have accumulated, work center 1 proceeds
with production.
458
Types Of Kanbans
• Kanban Square
– marked area designed to hold items
• Signal Kanban
– triangular kanban used to signal production at
the previous workstation
• Material Kanban
– used to order material in advance of a process
• Supplier Kanban
– rotates between the factory and supplier
459
Small-Lot Production
460
Benefits Of JIT
Step Objective
Identify Identify the current constraint (the single part of the process that
limits the rate at which the goal is achieved).
Exploit Make quick improvements to the throughput of the constraint using
existing resources (i.e. make the most of what you have).
Subordina Review all other activities in the process to ensure that they are
te aligned with and truly support the needs of the constraint.
Elevate If the constraint still exists (i.e. it has not moved), consider what
further actions can be taken to eliminate it from being the
constraint. Normally, actions are continued at this step until the
constraint has been “broken” (until it has moved somewhere else).
In some cases, capital investment may be required.
Repeat The Five Focusing Steps are a continuous improvement cycle.
Therefore, once a constraint is resolved the next constraint should
immediately be addressed. This step is a reminder to never become
complacent – aggressively improve the current constraint…and then
immediately move on to the next constraint.
The Thinking Processes
The Theory of Constraints includes a sophisticated problem
solving methodology called the Thinking Processes. The Thinking
Processes are optimized for complex systems with many
interdependencies (e.g. manufacturing lines). They are designed
as scientific “cause and effect” tools, which strive to first identify
the root causes of undesirable effects (referred to as UDEs), and
then remove the UDEs without creating new ones.
Future Documents the Diagram that shows the future state, which reflects the results
Reality Tree future state. of injecting changes into the system that are designed to
eliminate UDEs.
Strategy and Provides an Diagram that shows an implementation plan for achieving the
Tactics Tree action plan for future state. Creates a logical structure that organizes
improvement. knowledge and derives tactics from strategy. Note: this tool is
intended to replace the formerly used Prerequisite Tree in the
Thinking Processes.
Throughput Accounting
• Throughput Accounting is an alternative accounting methodology that
attempts to eliminate harmful distortions introduced from traditional
accounting practices – distortions that promote behaviors contrary to the
goal of increasing profit in the long term.
• Inventory that may or may not ever be sold (e.g. due to obsolescence) and
that incurs cost as it sits in storage. The Theory of Constraints, on the
other hand, considers inventory to be a liability – inventory ties up cash
that could be used more productively elsewhere.
The strongest emphasis (by far) is on increasing Throughput. In essence, TOC is saying
to focus less on cutting expenses (Investment and Operating Expenses) and focus
more on building sales (Throughput).
Drum-Buffer-Rope
Drum-Buffer-Rope – A method from the Theory of Constraints for synchronizing production to
the constraint while minimizing inventory and work-in-process. The “Drum” is the constraint. The
“Buffer” is the inventory needed to maintain production. The “Rope” is a signal from the
constraint when a specific amount of inventory has been consumed.
(DBR) is a method of synchronizing production to the constraint while minimizing inventory and
work-in-process.
The “Drum” is the constraint. The speed at which the constraint runs sets the “beat” for the
process and determines total throughput.
The “Buffer” is the level of inventory needed to maintain consistent production. It ensures that
brief interruptions and fluctuations in non-constraints do not affect the constraint. Buffers
represent time; the amount of time (usually measured in hours) that work-in-process should
arrive in advance of being used to ensure steady operation of the protected resource. The more
variation there is in the process the larger the buffers need to be. An alternative to large buffer
inventories is sprint capacity (intentional overcapacity) at non-constraints. Typically, there are two
buffers:
The “Rope” is a signal generated by the constraint indicating that some amount of inventory has
been consumed. This in turn triggers an identically sized release of inventory into the process.
The role of the rope is to maintain throughput without creating an accumulation of excess
inventory.
Drum-Buffer-Rope
• Metaphoric example to understand the flow of a supply chain. A concept of increasing throughput
by adjusting buffers by a rope and controlling speed by a drum.
• Like members of a mountaineering team who climb a mountain on the rope, a drum and rope are
used for an analogy of management tools when soldiers march or boy scouts hike.
• This troop analogy was first applied to a production line by Ford Motor Co., Ltd. who connected
production processes of an automobile assembly line by conveyer belts. Then, Mr. Taiichi Ohno of
Toyota Motor Corporation introduced a rope called "KANBAN". Both of the concepts brought an
innovation in company management and had a great impact on economic growth.
• As in an example of boy scouts hiking, those who are bottlenecks are positioned at the beginning
and a rope is used for subordinating (synchronizing) the speed of followers with that of the
bottleneck persons. This enables preventing the march (work-in-process inventory) from
expanding. In other words, to eliminate work-in-process inventory is to reduce costs. Also, in
preventing the front ones of the bottleneck group who determine the marching speed of the entire
team from slowing down, a rope plays an important role as a buffer to absorb the changes in the
marching speed of the front ones of the bottleneck group. A drum plays a role of conveying the
information about the speed of the slowest bottleneck persons to everyone in the group and
cheering up the bottleneck persons to raise their speed up.
• When the rope is stretched out to the limit, it is necessary to impose a constraint on those who tied
to the rope so that they will not be able to raise the speed any further. In some cases, work needs
to suspend when the buffer reaches the limit. Similarly, the team may sometimes need to stop. If
the drum is beaten at the speed of the first person of the team, an interval with the following
persons will get wider and wider. In that case, the inventory level will increase and throughput will
decrease. If the drum is beaten at the speed of the last person of the team, i.e. the team marches
at the speed of the inventory, the inventory level will decrease and throughput will increase as the
speed of demand increases. The pull-type system means to beat a drum at the speed of the last
person, which corresponds to as demand-driven pull type supply chain management.
Drum-Buffer-Rope
Drum-Buffer-Rope
THE NATURE OF CONSTRAINTS
What are Constraints?
Constraints are anything that prevents the organization from making progress towards its goal. In
manufacturing processes, constraints are often referred to as bottlenecks. Interestingly,
constraints can take many forms other than equipment. There are differing opinions on how to
best categorize constraints; a common approach is shown in the following table.
Constraint Description
Physical Typically equipment, but can also be other tangible items, such as material
shortages, lack of people, or lack of space.
Policy Required or recommended ways of working. May be informal (e.g.
described to new employees as “how things are done here”). Examples
include company procedures (e.g. how lot sizes are calculated, bonus plans,
overtime policy), union contracts (e.g. a contract that prohibits cross-
training), or government regulations (e.g. mandated breaks).
Paradigm Deeply engrained beliefs or habits. For example, the belief that “we must
always keep our equipment running to lower the manufacturing cost per
piece”. A close relative of the policy constraint.
Market Occurs when production capacity exceeds sales (the external marketplace is
constraining throughput). If there is an effective ongoing application of the
Theory of Constraints, eventually the constraint is likely to move to the
marketplace.
THE NATURE OF CONSTRAINTS
• There are also differing opinions on whether a system can have
more than one constraint. The conventional wisdom is that most
systems have one constraint, and occasionally a system may have
two or three constraints.
• In manufacturing plants where a mix of products is produced, it is
possible for each product to take a unique manufacturing path and
the constraint may “move” depending on the path taken. This
environment can be modeled as multiple systems – one for each
unique manufacturing path.
SIMPLIFIED ROADMAP
An excellent way to deepen your understanding of the Theory of
Constraints is to walk through a simple implementation example.
In this example, the Five Focusing Steps are used to identify and
eliminate an equipment constraint (i.e. bottleneck) in the
manufacturing process.
Step One – Identify the Constraint
In this step, the manufacturing process is reviewed to identify the constraint.
A simple but often effective technique is to literally walk through the
manufacturing process looking for indications of the constraint.
Item Description
WIP Look for large accumulations of work-in-process on the plant floor.
Inventory often accumulates immediately before the constraint.
Expedite Look for areas where process expeditors are frequently involved. Special
attention and handholding are often needed at the constraint to ensure that
critical orders are completed on time.
Cycle Review equipment performance data to determine which equipment has the
Time longest average cycle time. Adjust out time where the equipment is not
operating due to external factors, such as being starved by an upstream
process or blocked by a downstream process. Although such time affects
throughput, the time loss is usually not caused or controlled by the
starved/blocked equipment.
Demand Ask operators where they think equipment is not keeping up with demand.
Pay close attention to these areas, but also look for other supporting
indicators.
The deliverable for this step is the identification of the single piece
of equipment that is constraining process throughput.
Step Two – Exploit the Constraint
In this step, the objective is to make the most of what you have – maximize throughput of the constraint using
currently available resources. The line between exploiting the constraint (this step) and elevating the constraint
(the fourth step) is not always clear. This step focuses on quick wins and rapid relief; leaving more complex and
substantive changes for later.
Item Description
Buffer Create a suitably sized inventory buffer immediately in front of the constraint
to ensure that it can keep operating even if an upstream process stops.
Quality Check quality immediately before the constraint so only known good parts
are processed by the constraint.
Continuou Ensure that the constraint is continuously scheduled for operation (e.g.
s operate the constraint during breaks, approve overtime, schedule fewer
Operation changeovers, cross-train employees to ensure there are always skilled
employees available for operating the constraint).
Maintenan Move routine maintenance activities outside of constraint production time
ce (e.g. during changeovers).
Offload Offload some constraint work to other machines. Even if they are less
(Internal) efficient, the improved system throughput is likely to improve overall
profitability.
Offload Offload some work to other companies. This should be a last resort if other
(External) techniques are not sufficient to relieve the constraint.
The deliverable for this step is improved utilization of the constraint, which in turn will
result in improved throughput for the process. If the actions taken in this step “break” the
constraint (i.e. the constraint moves) jump ahead to Step Five. Otherwise, continue to
Step Three.
Step Three – Subordinate and Synchronize to the Constraint
In this step, the focus is on non-constraint equipment. The primary objective is to support the needs of the
constraint (i.e. subordinate to the constraint). Efficiency of non-constraint equipment is a secondary
concern as long as constraint operation is not adversely impacted.
By definition, all non-constraint equipment has some degree of excess capacity. This excess capacity is a
virtue, as it enables smoother operation of the constraint. The manufacturing process is purposely
unbalanced:
Item Description
Upstream Upstream equipment has excess capacity that ensures that the constraint buffer is
continuously filled (but not overfilled) so that the constraint is never “starved” by the
upstream process.
Downstream Downstream equipment has excess capacity that ensures that material from the
constraint is continually processed so the constraint is never “blocked” by the
downstream process.
Step Three – Subordinate and Synchronize to the Constraint
tem Description
DBR Implement DBR (Drum-Buffer-Rope) on the constraint as a way of
synchronizing the manufacturing process to the needs of the constraint.
Priority Subordinate maintenance to the constraint by ensuring that the constraint
is always the highest priority for maintenance calls.
Sprint Add sprint capacity to non-constraint equipment to ensure that
interruptions to their operation (e.g. breakdowns or material changes) can
quickly be offset by faster operation and additional output.
The deliverable for this step is fewer instances of constraint operation being stopped by
upstream or downstream equipment, which in turn results in improved throughput for
the process. If the actions taken in this step “break” the constraint (i.e. the constraint
moves) jump ahead to Step Five. Otherwise, continue to Step Four.
Step Four – Elevate Performance of the Constraint
In this step, more substantive changes are implemented to “break” the constraint. These changes
may necessitate a significant investment of time and/or money (e.g. adding equipment or hiring
more staff). The key is to ensure that all such investments are evaluated for effectiveness
(preferably using Throughput
Item Accounting metrics).
Description
Performance Data Use performance data (e.g. Overall Equipment Effectiveness metrics
plus downtime analytics) to identify the largest sources of lost
productive time at the constraint.
Top Losses Target the largest sources of lost productive time, one-by-one, with
cross-functional teams.
Reviews Implement ongoing plant floor reviews within shifts (a technique
called Short Interval Control) to identify tactical actions that will
improve constraint performance.
Setup Reduction Implement a setup reduction program to reduce the amount of
productive time lost to changeovers.
Updates/Upgrades Evaluate the constraint for potential design updates and/or
component upgrades.
Equipment Purchase additional equipment to supplement the constraint (a last
resort).
Item Description
Constraint Broken If the constraint has been broken (the normal case),
recognize that there is a new constraint. Finding and
eliminating the new constraint is the new priority
(restart at Step One).
Constraint Not Broken If the constraint has not been broken, recognize that
more work is required, and a fresh look needs to be
taken, including verifying that the constraint has been
correctly identified (restart at Step One).
This step also includes a caution…beware of inertia. Remain vigilant and ensure
that improvement is ongoing and continuous. The Five Focusing Steps are kind of
like “Whac-A-Mole”…pound one constraint down and then move right on to the
next!
INTEGRATING WITH LEAN
Contrasting Theory of Constraints and Lean Manufacturing
The Theory of Constraints and Lean Manufacturing are both systematic
methods for improving manufacturing effectiveness. However, they have
very different approaches:
• The Theory of Constraints focuses on identifying and removing
constraints that limit throughput. Therefore, successful application
tends to increase manufacturing capacity.
• Lean Manufacturing focuses on eliminating waste from the
manufacturing process. Therefore, successful application tends to
reduce manufacturing costs.
Both methodologies have a strong customer focus and are capable of
transforming companies to be faster, stronger, and more agile.
Nonetheless, there are significant differences, as highlighted in the
following table.
INTEGRATING WITH LEAN
Both methodologies have a strong customer focus and are capable of
transforming companies to be faster, stronger, and more agile. Nonetheless,
there are significant differences, as highlighted in the following table.
What? Theory of Constraints Lean Manufacturing
Objective Increase throughput. Eliminate waste.
Focus Singular focus on the constraint (until it is no Broad focus on the elimination of
longer the constraint). waste from the manufacturing
process.
Result Increased manufacturing capacity. Reduced manufacturing cost.
Inventory Maintain sufficient inventory to maximize Eliminate virtually all inventory.
throughput at the constraint.
Line Create imbalance to maximize throughput at Create balance to eliminate waste
Balancing the constraint. (excess capacity).
Pacing Constraint sets the pace (Drum-Buffer-Rope). Customer sets the pace (Takt
Time).
From the perspective of the Theory of Constraints, it is more practical and less expensive to
maintain a degree of excess capacity for non-constraints (i.e. an intentionally unbalanced line)
than to try to eliminate all sources of variation (which is necessary to efficiently operate a
balanced line). Eliminating variation is still desirable in TOC; it is simply given less attention
than improving throughput.
Combining Theory of Constraints and Lean Manufacturing
One of the most powerful aspects of the Theory of Constraints is its laser-like
focus on improving the constraint. While Lean Manufacturing can be focused,
more typically it is implemented as a broad-spectrum tool.
In the real world, there is always a need to compromise, since all companies
have finite resources. Not every aspect of every process is truly worth
optimizing, and not all waste is truly worth eliminating. In this light, the
Theory of Constraints can serve as a highly effective mechanism for
prioritizing improvement projects, while Lean Manufacturing can provide a
rich toolbox of improvement techniques. The result – manufacturing
effectiveness is significantly increased by eliminating waste from the parts of
the system that are the largest constraints on opportunity and profitability.
While Lean Manufacturing tools and techniques are primarily applied to the
constraint, they can also be applied to equipment that is subordinated to the
constraint (e.g. to equipment that starves or blocks the constraint; to post-
constraint equipment that causes quality losses).
Visual Visual FactoryDisplays constraint production metrics in real time – a powerful motivator.
Factory •Reduces reaction time to stoppages by instantly alerting operators to intervene.
/ Andon •Empowers operators to call immediate attention to problems at the constraint.
•Increases focus by using visuals to reinforce the importance of the constraint.
is a strategy for conveying information through easily seen plant floor visuals. Andons are visual
displays that indicate production status and enable operators to bring immediate attention to
problems – so they can be instantly addressed.
Applying Lean Tools to “Exploit the Constraint”
Kaizen •KaizenProvides a proven mechanism for generating ideas on how to exploit the
constraint.
•Identifies “quick win” opportunities for improving throughput of the
constraint.
•Engages operators to work as a team and to think critically about their work.
provides a framework for employees to work in small groups that suggest and
implement incremental improvements for the manufacturing process. It
combines the collective talents of a company to create an engine for continuous
improvement.
Applying Lean Tools to “Subordinate to the Constraint”
Lean Manufacturing techniques for regulating flow (Kanban) and synchronizing automated lines
(Line Control) can be applied towards subordinating and synchronizing to the constraint.
Lean
Tool Description
Kanban Kanban
• Offers simple visual techniques for controlling the flow of materials.
• Synchronizes material usage at the constraint with material usage in the
upstream process by controlling when new materials are released into the
process.
is a method for regulating the flow of materials, which provides for automatic
replenishment through signal cards that indicate when more materials are
needed.
Line Line Control
Control • Provides an effective alternative to traditional Drum-Buffer-Rope for
FMCG lines.
• Optimizes constraint and non-constraint running speeds to maximize
throughput and reduce the frequency of minor stops.
• Reduces startup delays on the constraint by synchronizing equipment
startup.
is a sophisticated technique used with synchronous automated lines, such as
FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) lines, which slaves non-constraint
equipment to the constraint in such a way as to increase overall system
throughput.
Applying Lean Tools to “Elevate the Constraint”
Lean Manufacturing techniques for proactively maintaining equipment (TPM), dramatically reducing
changeover times (SMED), building defect detection and prevention into production processes (Poka-
Yoke), and partially automating equipment (Jidoka) all have direct application when elevating the
constraint. TPM and SMED can also be viewed as exploitation techniques (maximizing throughput using
currently available resources); however, they are fairly complex and are likely to benefit from working
with outside experts.
Lean
Tool Description
TPM TPM (Total Productive Maintenance)Reduces the frequency of constraint breakdowns and
minor stops.
• Provides operators with a stronger feeling of “ownership” for their equipment.
• Enables most maintenance to be planned and scheduled for non-production time.
• Targets quality issues by finding and removing the root causes of defects.
offers a holistic approach to maintenance that focuses on proactive and preventative
maintenance to maximize the operational time of the constraint (increasing up time,
reducing cycle times, and eliminating defects).
SME SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Dies)
D • Increases usable production time at the constraint.
• Enables smaller lot sizes, resulting in improved responsiveness to customer demand.
• Enables smoother startups, since a simplified and standardized changeover process
improves quality and consistency.
is a method for dramatically reducing changeover time at the constraint. As many steps as
possible are converted to external (performed while the process is running) and remaining
steps are streamlined (e.g. bolts and manual adjustments are eliminated).
Applying Lean Tools to “Elevate the Constraint”