Assignment 3 Question 1
Co = 2,500,000 t = 0
CF = 600,000, t=1,2,3,4,5,6
S = 350,000, t=6
R = 15%
1A) Payback period
Period Cash Flow Remaining
0 -2,500,000 -2,500,000
1 600,000 -1,900,000
2 600,000 -1,300,000
3 600,000 -700,000
4 600,000 -100,000
5 600,000 500,00
6 600,000 + 350,000 = 950,000 1,450,000
Payback occurs somewhere during Year 4.
Payback period = 4 + (100,000 / 600,000) * 12
Payback period = 4 + (0.16666667 * 12)
Payback period = 4 years, 2 months.
1B) Discounted Payback Period
Period Cash Flow Calculation PV (Cash Flow) Remaining
0 -2,500,000 - -2,500,000 -2,500,000
1 600,000 /(1.15) 521,739.1304 -1,978,260.87
2 600,000 /(1.15^2) 453,686.2004 -1,524,574.669
3 600,000 /(1.15^3) 394,509.4395 -1,130,064.930
4 600,000 /(1.15^4) 343,051.9474 -787,012.9826
5 600,000 /(1.15^5) 298,306.0412 -488,706.9411
6 950,000 /(1.15^6) 410,711.2161 -77,995.425
Since there is still -$77,995.43 remaining at the end of the life, there is no discount payback period.
1C) If Choo Choo’s cutoff period is five years, they would purchase the printer based on the payback
period but they would not purchase it based on the discounted payback period.
1D) Net Present Value
NPV = PV(inflows) + PV(outflows)
Inflows
CF= 600,000, t=1,2,3,4,5,6
S = 350,000, t=6
Outflows
Co= 2,500,000
PV(inflows)
PV(CF) = 600,000 [1 – (1 / (1 + r)^N)] / N
PV(CF) = 600,000 [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^6)] / 0.15
PV(CF) = 2,270,689.616
PV(S) = 350,000 (1 + r)^N
PV(S) = 350,000 (1.15)^6
PV(S) = 151,314.6586
NPV= 2,270,689.616 + 151,314.6586 – 2,500,000
NPV = -77,995.72543
The NPV is -$77,995.73. It is negative, so the purchase of the printer should be rejected.
1E) Profitability Index
PI = PV(inflows) / PV(outflows)
PI = (2,270,689.616 + 151,314.6586) / 2,500,000
PI = 0.97
The profitability index is 0.97. Since it is less than 1, the printer should not be purchased.
1F) Internal Rate of Return
Use financial calculator
CF0= -2500000
CF1= 600000
CF2= 600000
CF3= 600000
CF4= 600000
CF5= 600000
CF6= 950000
COMP IRR = 13.89863770= 13.90%
1G) Check if IRR is where NPV = 0
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows) = 0
0 = {600,000[1-(1/(1+0.138986377)^6)]/0.135986377} + [350,000/(1+0.135986377)^6] – 2,500,000
0 = 2,339,691.384 + 160,308.6166 - -2,500,000
0=0
Yes, at IRR = 13.90%, the NPV = 0. Based on this criterion, the printer should not be purchased
because the IRR is less than the required rate of return (r = 15%)
1H) I would recommend that Choo Choo not purchase the printer
Assignment 3 Question 2
Capital rationing is when a firm has positive NPV projects but no means of financing them. There are two
types of capital rationing: soft and hard.
Soft Capital Rationing: self-imposed budgeting in which it is determined internally how much
money each department will get in a period (such as an annual departmental budget).
Hard Capital Rationing: “market imposed” rationing, meaning that no external forces in the
market are willing to assist with financing the positive NPV projects.
Capital rationing can affect the goal of maximizing shareholder equity because it tends to encourage
managers to take on projects that provide short term funds instead of focusing on the long term
benefits of rejected projects.
Assignment 3 Question 3
3A) Internal Rate of Return
INVESTMENT A
CF0= -100
CF1= 10
CF2= 30
CF3= 50
CF4= 70
COMP IRR = 16.62108753
INVESTMENT B
CF0= -1000
CF1= 50
CF2= 40
CF3= 30
CF4= 20
COMP IRR = 17.80474606
Investments A’s IRR is 16.62% and Investment B’s is 17.80%
3B) See Excel file
3C) See Excel file
3D) Conclusions at 17%
INVESTMENT A @ 17%
IRR = 16.62%
Reject – IRR is less than required rate
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = (10 / (1.17)) + (30 / (1.17^2)) + (50 / (1.17^3)) + (70 / (1.17^4)) – 100
NPV = 8.547008547 + 21.91540653 + 31.21852782 + 37.35550338 – 100
NPV = -0.963553723
Reject – NPV is less than 0
INVESTMENT B @ 17%
IRR = 17.80%
Accept – IRR is greater than the required rate of return
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = (50 / (1.17)) + (40/(1.17^2)) + (30 / (1.17^3)) + (20/(1.17^4)) – 100
NPV = 1.3597024
Accept – NPV is greater than 0
Yes, r=17% would lead us to the conclusion that we should reject Investment A and accept Investment
B
3E) Conclusion at r=10%
INVESTMENT A @ 10%
IRR = 16.62%
Accept – IRR is greater than the required rate
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = (10 / (1.1)) + (30 / (1.1^2)) + (50 / (1.1^3)) + (70 / (1.1^4)) – 100
NPV = 9.09090909 + 24.79338843 + 37.56574005 + 47.81094188 – 100
NPV = 19.2609795
Accept – NPV is greater than 0
INVESTMENT B @ 10%
IRR = 17.80%
Accept – IRR is greater than the required rate
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = (50 / (1.1)) + (40/(1.1^2)) + (30 / (1.1^3)) + (20/(1.1^4)) – 100
NPV = 14.712109
Accept – NPV is greater than 0
Yes, r=10% would lead us to conclude that both investments are acceptable
3F) Crossover Rate
Difference of Cash Flows
Period CFA – CFB Difference
0 -100 – (-100) 0
1 10 – 50 -40
2 30 – 40 -10
3 50 – 30 20
4 70 – 20 50
Use Financial Calculator
CF0 = 0
CF1 = -40
CF2 = -10
CF3 = 20
CF4 = 50
COMP IRR = 14.34049115%
The crossover rate is 14.34%
Assignment 3 Question 4
ATOCF using 4 approaches
Proforma Statement:
Sales 2,000,000
Variable Costs 1,500,000
Fixed Costs 150,000
Depreciation 190,000
EBIT 160,000
Interest 0
Taxable Income 160,000
Taxes 56,000
Net Income 104,000
NORMAL APPROACH
OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – Tax
OCF = 160,000 + 190,000 – 56,000
OCF = 294,000
BOTTOM UP APPROACH
OCF = Net Income + Depreciation
OCF = 104,000 + 190,000
OCF = 294,000
TOP DOWN APPROACH
OCF = Sales – Costs – Taxes
OCF = 2,000,000 – 1,500,000 – 56,000
OCF = 294,000
TAX SHIELD APPROACH
OCF = [(Sales – Costs) * (1-T)] + Depreciation Tax Shield
OCF = [(2,000,000 – 1,500,000) * (1 – 0.35)] + (190,000 * 0.35)
OCF = 294,000
Assignment 3 Question 5
Project A Project B
Co = 1,500, t= 0 Co = 5,000, t=0
CF = 800, t=1,2,3 CF= 1,500, t=1,2,3,4,5
R= 10%
5A) NPV of Projects
PROJECT A NPV
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = 800 [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.1)^3)] / 0.1 – 1,500
NPV = 1989.180154 – 1,500
NPV = 489.481593
NPV = 489.48
PROJECT B NPV
NPV = 1,500 [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.1)^5)] / 0.1 – 5,000
NPV = 5,686.180154 – 5,000
NPV = 686.180154
NPV = 686.18
5B) We should not use the NPV criteria in this case because the different life spans would result in an
inaccurate decision. Instead, we should use the Equivalent Annual Costs (in this case, Equivalent Annual
Benefit because they are both positive). Alternatively, we could use the Matching Life Multiples Method,
which is much more cumbersome.
5C) Equivalent Annual Benefit method
PVAF(A) = [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.1)^3)] / 0.1 = 2.486851991
PVAF(B) = [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.1)^5)] / 0.1 = 3.790786769
EAB(A) = NPV(A) / PVAF(A)
EAB(A) = 489.481593 / 2.486851991
EAB(A) = 196.8277946
EAB(B) = NPV(B) / PVAF(B)
EAB(B) = 686.180154 / 3.790786769
EAB(B) = 181.0125960
We should choose Project A because it has a higher EAB.
5D) Real Rate
(1+nom) = (1+real)(1+inflation)
(1+0.1) = (1+real)(1+0.03)
(1+0.1) / (1+0.03) = 1 + real
1.1 / 1.03 = 1 + real
(1.1 / 1.03) – 1 = real
0.067961165 = real
The real rate of return is 6.80%
5E) Real Cash Flows
REAL CASH FLOWS A
Period Cash Flow Calculation Real
0 -1,500 - -1,500
1 800 / 1.03 776.70
2 800 / 1.03^2 754.08
3 800 / 1.03^3 732.11
REAL CASH FLOWS B
Period Cash Flow Calculation Real
0 -5,000 - -5,000
1 1,500 / 1.03 1,456.31
2 1,500 / 1.03^2 1,413.89
3 1,500 / 1.03^3 1,372.71
4 1,500 / 1.03^4 1,332.73
5 1,500 / 1.03^4 1,293.91
5F) NPV, Real Cash Flows
REAL NPV PROJECT A
PV(CF1) = 776.6990291 / (1.067961165) = 727.2727273
PV(CF2) = 754.0767273 / (1.067961165^2) = 661.1570248
PV(CF3) = 732.1133275 / (1.067961165^3) = 601.0518408
PV(inflows) 1,989.481593
Minus PV(outflows) - 1,500. 000000
Real NPV(A) = 489.481593
REAL NPV PROJECT B
PV(CF1) = 1456.310680 / (1.067961165) = 1,363.636363
PV(CF2) = 1413.893864 / (1.067961165^2) = 1,239.669422
PV(CF3) = 1372.712489 / (1.067961165^3) = 1,126.972201
PV(CF4) = 1332.730572 / (1.067961165^4) = 1,024.520183
PV(CF5) = 1293.913177 / (1.067961165^5) = 931.3819851
PV(inflows) 5,686.180154
Minus PV(outflows) -5,000.000000
Real NPV(B) = 686.180154
Both Real NPVs are the same as the nominal NPVs.
5G) Real EAB
PVAF(A) = [ 1 – (1 / (1 + 0.067961165)^3)] / 0.067961165 = 2.634122465
PVAF(B) = [ 1 – (1 / (1 + 0.067961165)^5)] / 0.067961165 = 4.122678118
EAB(A) = NPV(A) / PVAF(A)
EAB(A) = 489.481593 / 2.634122465
EAB(A) = 185.8234002
EAB(B) = NPV(B) / PVAF(B)
EAB(B) = 686.180154 / 4.122678118
EAB(B) = 166.4403901
Choose Project A because it has a higher real EAB.
Assignment 3 Question 6
Replacement
Co (old) = 1,000,000, t=-2
S(old) = 300,000, t = 0
S(old) = 50,000, t=5
Co(new) – 1,500,000, t=0
S(new) = 300,000, t=5
Co = Co(new) – S(old @ t=0)
Co= 1,500,000 – 300,000
Co = 1,200,000
S = S(new) – S(old @ t=5)
S= 300,000 – 50,000
S = 250,000
CCa = 30%, r = 15%
PV(INFLOWS)
PV(CCATS) = [(Cdt / (r + d)) * ((1 + 0.5r) / (1 + r))] – [(Sdt / (r + d)) / (1 + r)^N]
PV(CCATS) = [((1,200,000)(0.3)(0.2)) / (0.15 + 0.3) / (1 + 0.5(0.15)) / (1.15)] – [((250,000)(0.3)(0.2)) / (0.15
+ 0.3) / (1.15^5)]
PV(CCATS) = [(72,500 / 0.45) * (1.075/1.15)] – [(15,000 / 0.45)) / (1.15^5)]
PV(CCATS) = 160,000 * 0.934782609 – (33,333.33333 / (1.15^5))
PV(CCATS) = 149,565.2174 – 16,572.55784
PV)CCATS) = 132,992.6596
PV(S) = 250,000 / (1.15^5)
PV(S) = 124,294.1838
OUTFLOWS
Co = 500,000
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = 132,992.6596 + 124,294.1838 – 500,000
NPV = 257,286.8434 – 500,000
NPV = -242,713.1566
No, the computers should not be replaced, because the NPV is - $242,713.16.
Assignment 3 Question 7
7A) Cash Breakeven
Qcash = FC / (P – v)
Qcash = 150,000 / (200 – 150)
Qcash = 3,000 units
(assuming tax shields cannot be applied)
7B) Accounting Breakeven
Qacc = (FC + D) / (P – v)
Qacc = (150,000 + 190,000) / (200 -150)
Qacc = 340,000 / 50
Qacc = 6,800 units
7C) Financial Breakeven
PVAF = [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^5)] / 0.15
PVAF = 3.352155098
PV(OCF) = OCF * PVAF
PV(OCF) = OCF * 3.352155098
At NPV = 0,
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
0 = (OCF * 3.352155098) – 950,000
950,000 = OCF * 3.352133098
OCF = 283,399.7748
Qfin = (FC+ [OCF – (T*D)) / (1 – T))) / (P – v)
Qfin = [150,000 + (283,399.7748 + (0.35 * 190,000)) / (1 – 0.35)] / (250 – 50)
Qfin = [150,000 = (283,399.7748 + 66,500) / 0.65] / 50
Qfin = [(150,000 + 416,399.7748) / 0.65] / 50
Qfin = (566,399.7748 / 0.65) / 50
Qfin = 871,384.2689 / 50
Qfin = 17,427.68538
Qfin = 17,428 units
7D) Degree of Operating Leverage
CASH DOL
DOL = 1 + (150,000 / 0)
DOL = infinity
ACCOUNTING DOL
OCF = [[(P – v) Q – FC] * (1 – T)] + DT
OCF = [[(200 – 50) 6,800 – 150,000] * (1 – 0.35)] + (190,000 * 0.35)
OCF =[[(50) 6,800 – 150,000] * 0.65] + 66,500
OCF = [(340,000 – 150,000) * 0.65] + 66,500
OCF = (190,000 * 0.65) + 66,500
OCF = 123,500 + 66,500
OCF = 247,000
DOL = 1 + (FC / OCF)
DOL = 1 + (150,000 / 247,000)
DOL = 1 + 0.607287449
DOL = 1.607287449
DOL = 1.61
FINANCIAL DOL
DOL = 1 + (FC / OCF)
DOL = 1 + (150,000 / 283,399.7748)
DOL = 1 + 0.529287647
DOL = 1.529387647
DOL = 1.53
Assignment 3 Question 8
Co = 680,000 Q = 100
Dep = 680,000 / 4 = 170,000 FC = 150,000
V = 14,000 S=0
P = 19,000 R = 15%
N=4 T = 35%
8Ai) NPV
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
INFLOWS
ATOCF = [[(P – v)Q – FC] * (1-T) – DT]
ATOCF = [(19,000 – 14,000) 100 – 150,000] * (1-0.35) + (170,000 * 0.35)
ATOCF = [5,000(100) – 150,000] * 0.62 + 59,500
ATOCF = (500,000 – 150,000) * 0.62 + 59,500
ATOCF = (350,000 * 0.62) + 59,500
ATOCF = 227,500 + 59,500
ATOCF = 287,000, t=1,2,3,4
PV(INFLOWS)
PV(ATOCF) = 287,500 [ 1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^4)] / 0.15
PV(ATOCF) = 819,378.7901
OUTFLOWS
Co = 680,000, t=0
NPV = 819,378.7901 – 680,000
NPV = 139,378.7901
The NPV is $139,378.79.
8Aii) Profitability Index
PI = P(inflows) / PV(outflows)
PI = 819,378.7901 / 680,000
PI = 1.204968809
The profitability index is 1.20
8Aiii) Payback Period
Period Cash Flow Remaining
0 -680,000 680,000
1 287,000 -393,000
2 287,000 -106,000
3 287,000 181,000
4 287,000 468,000
Payback = 2 years + (106,000/287,000) * 12 = 2 years + 0.369337979 * 12 = 2 years, 4.43 months
The payback period is 2 years and 4 months.
8Aiv) Discounted Payback
Period Cash Flow Calculation Discounted Remaining
0 -680,000 - - -680,000
1 287,000 /1.15 249,565.2174 -430,434.7826
2 287,000 /(1.15^2) 217,013.2325 -213,421.5501
3 287,000 /(1.15^3) 188,707.1587 -24,714.3914
4 287,000 /(1.15^4) 164,093.1815 139,378.7901
Discounted payback = 3 + (24714/164073.1815)*12 = 3 years 1.8 months
The discounted payback period is 3 years and 2 months
8Av) IRR
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
0 = [287,000 [1 – (1 / (1 + IRR)^4)] / IRR] – 6680,000
680,000 = 287,000 [1 – (1 / (1 + IRR)^4)] / IRR
Use Financial Calculator
PV = 680,000
PMT = -287,000
N=4
COMP I/Y = 24.81642528
The IRR is 24.82%
8Avi) AAR
Net Income = [(P – v)Q – FC – Dep] * (1-T)
NI = [(19,000 – 14,000) 100 – 150,000 – 170,000] * (1-0.35)
NI = [5,000 (100) – 320,000] * 0.65
NI = (500,000 – 320,000) * 0.65
NI = 180,000 * 0.65
NI = 117,000
Average Book Value = 680,000 – 0 / 2 = 340,000
AAR = NI / Ave BV
AAR = 117,000 / 340,000
AAR = 0.344117647
The AAR is 34.41%
8B)
Co = 680,000 Q = 110 or 90
Dep = 680,000 / 4 = 170,000 FC = 150,000
V = 14,000 S=0
P = 19,000 R = 15%
N=4 T = 35%
8Bi) Sensitivity of NPV
NPV @ =10% Q (Q = 110)
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
INFLOWS
ATOCF = [[(P – v)Q – FC] * (1-T) – DT]
ATOCF = [(19,000 – 14,000) 110 – 150,000] * (1-0.35) + (170,000 * 0.35)
ATOCF = [5,000(110) – 150,000] * 0.62 + 59,500
ATOCF = (550,000 – 150,000) * 0.62 + 59,500
ATOCF = (400,000 * 0.62) + 59,500
ATOCF = 260,000 + 59,500
ATOCF = 319,500, t=1,2,3,4
PV(INFLOWS)
PV(ATOCF) = 319,500 [ 1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^4)] / 0.15
PV(ATOCF) = 912,165.5869
OUTFLOWS
Co = 680,000, t=0
NPV = 912,165.5869 – 680,000
NPV = 232,165.5869
% CHANGE IN NPV
% change = new NPV / old NPV
% change = 232,165.5869 / 139,378.7901
% change = 1.665716762
NPV @ -10%Q (Q = 90)
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
INFLOWS
ATOCF = [[(P – v)Q – FC] * (1-T) – DT]
ATOCF = [(19,000 – 14,000) 90 – 150,000] * (1-0.35) + (170,000 * 0.35)
ATOCF = [5,000(90) – 150,000] * 0.62 + 59,500
ATOCF = (450,000 – 150,000) * 0.62 + 59,500
ATOCF = (300,000 * 0.62) + 59,500
ATOCF = 195,000 + 59,500
ATOCF = 254,500, t=1,2,3,4
PV(INFLOWS)
PV(ATOCF) = 254,500 [ 1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^4)] / 0.15
PV(ATOCF) = 726,591.9933
OUTFLOWS
Co = 680,000, t=0
NPV = 726,591.9933 – 680,000
NPV = 46,591.9931
% CHANGE IN NPV
% change = 46,591.9931 / 139,378.7901
% change = 0.3342883238
A 10% change in demand would result in a 33% change in NPV in either direction.
8Bii) Sensitivity of PI
PI @ + 10% Q (Q = 110)
PI = PV(inflows) / PV(outflows)
PI = 912,165.5869 / 680,000
PI = 1.341419981
% CHANGE IN PI
% change = new PI / old PI
% change = 1.341419981 / 1.204968809
% change = 1.113240418
PI @ - 10%Q (Q = 90)
PI = PV(inflows) / PV(outflows)
PI = 726,591.9933 / 680,000
PI = 1.068517637
% CHANGE IN PI
% change = new PI / old PI
% change = 1.068517637
% change = 0.886759582
A 10% change of demand in either direction would result in a 11% rise or 11% drop in PI.
8Biii) Sensitivity of Payback Period
PAYBACK @ +10% Q
Period Cash Flow Remaining
0 -680,000 680,000
1 319,500 -360,500
2 319,500 -41,000
3 319,500 278,000
4 319,500 598,000
Payback = 2 year + (41,000/319,500) * 12 = 2 years + (0.128325509) * 12 = 2 years + 1.5 months
% CHANGE IN PAYBACK PERIOD
% change = new payback / old payback
% change = 2.128325509 / 2.369337979
% change = 0.898278560
PAYBACK @ -10% Q
Period Cash Flow Remaining
0 -680,000 680,000
1 254,500 -425,500
2 254,500 -171,000
3 254,500 83,500
4 254,500 338,000
Payback = 2 years + (171,000 / 254,500) * 12 = 2 years + (0.671905697) * 12 = 2 years + 8 months
% CHANGE IN PAYBACK PERIOD
% change = new payback / old payback
% change = 2.671905687 / 2.369337979
% change = 1.127701375
A 10% change in demand in either direction would result in the payback period being ~ 12% shorter or
longer.
8Biv) Sensitivity of Discounted Payback Period
Discounted Payback Period @ + 10% Q
Period Cash Flow Calculation Discounted Remaining
0 -680,000 - - -680,000
1 319,500 /1.15 277,826.0870 -402,173.930
2 319,500 /(1.15^2) 241,587.9017 -160,586.0113
3 319,500 /(1.15^3) 210,076.4363 49,490.425
4 319,500 /(1.15^4) 182,675.1620 232,165.5870
Discounted payback = 2 years + (160586/210076.4363) * 12 = 2 years + 0.764417058 * 12 = 2 years + 9.2
months
% CHANGE IN DISCOUNTED PERIOD
% change = new discounted / old discounted
% change = 2.764417058 / 3.150611934
% change = 0.877422265
DISCOUNTED PAYBACK PERIOD @ - 10%
Period Cash Flow Calculation Discounted Remaining
0 -680,000 - - -680,000
1 254,500 /1.15 221,304.3478 -458,695.6522
2 254,500 /(1.15^2) 192,438.5633 -266,257.0889
3 254,500 /(1.15^3) 167,337.8812 -98,919.20770
4 254,500 /(1.15^4) 145,511.2010 46,591.9933
Discounted payback = 3 years + (98919.20770 / 145511.2010) * 12 = 3 years (0.679804764* 12) = 3
years + 8.2 months
% CHANGE IN DISCOUNTED PAYBACK PERIOD
% change = new discounted / old discounted
% change = 3.679804764 / 3.150611934
% change = 1.167965094
Bv) Sensitivity of IRR
IRR @ + 10% Q
680,000 = 319,500 [1 – (1 / (1 + IRR)^4)] / IRR
PV = 680,000
PMT= -319,500
N=4
COMP I/Y = 31.06043996%
CHANGE IN IRR
% change = new IRR – old IRR
% change = 31.06043996 – 24.81642528
% change = 6.244014677
IRR @ -10% Q
680,000 = 254,500 [1 – (1 / (1 + IRR)^4)] / IRR
PV = 680,000
PMT= -254,500
N=4
COMP I/Y = 18.34903579%
CHANGE IN IRR
% change = new IRR – old IRR
% change = 18.34903579 – 24.81642528
% change = 6.244014677
A 10% change in demand in either direction would result in a ~6% increase or ~6% decrease in IRR.
8Bvi) Sensitivity of AAR
AAR @ + 10% Q
Net Income = [(P – v)Q – FC – Dep] * (1-T)
NI = [(19,000 – 14,000) 110 – 150,000 – 170,000] * (1-0.35)
NI = [5,000 (110) – 320,000] * 0.65
NI = (500,000 – 320,000) * 0.65
NI = 230,000 * 0.65
NI = 149,500
Average Book Value = 680,000 – 0 / 2 = 340,000
AAR = NI / Ave BV
AAR = 149,500 / 340,000
AAR = 0.439705882 = 43.9705882%
% CHANGE IN AAR
% change = new AAR – old AAR
% change = 43.9705882 – 34.4117647
% change = 9.558811730
AAR @ -10% Q
Net Income = [(P – v)Q – FC – Dep] * (1-T)
NI = [(19,000 – 14,000) 100 – 150,000 – 170,000] * (1-0.35)
NI = [5,000 (90) – 320,000] * 0.65
NI = (450,000 – 320,000) * 0.65
NI = 130,000 * 0.65
NI = 84,500
Average Book Value = 680,000 – 0 / 2 = 340,000
AAR = NI / Ave BV
AAR = 84,500 / 340,000
AAR = 0.248529412 = 24.8529412%
% CHANGE IN AAR
% change = new AAR – old AAR
% change = 24.8529412 – 34.41177647
% change = -9.558835294
An increase or decrease of 10% demand would result in an AAR change of 9.55% in either direction.
Assignment 3 Question 9
Q = 35,000 V = 200
N=5 CCA = 20%
Co = 1,500,000 S = 500,000
FC = 300,000 P = 250
Addition to NWC = 450,000 R = 15%
NWC recovery = 450,00 T = 38%
9A) Base NPV
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
INFLOWS
NWC rec = 450,000, t=5
CAA tax shield = use CCA formula
S = 500,000, t = 5
ATOCF w/o CCA = [(P – v) Q – FC] * (1 – T)
ATOCF w/o CCA = [(250 – 200) 35,000 – 300,000] * (1 – 0.38)
ATOCF w/o CCA = [(50) 35,000 – 300,000] * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = (1,750,000 – 300,000) * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = 1,450,000 * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = 899,000, t=1,2,3,4,5
PV(INFLOWS)
PV(ATOCF w/o CCA) = ATOCF w/o CCA * PVAF
PV(ATOCF w/c CCA) = 899,000 [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^5)] / 0.15
PV(ATOCF w/o CCA) = 3,013,587.433
PV(CCATS) = [(Cdt / (r + d)) * ((1 + 0.5r) / (1 + r))] – [(Sdt / (r + d)) / (1 + r)^N]
PV(CCATS) = [((1,500,000)(0.2)(0.38)) / (0.15 + 0.2)) * ((1 + (0.5 * 0.15)) / (1 + 0.15)) – [((500,000)(0.2)
(0,38)) / (0.15 + 0.2)) / (1 + 0.15)^5]
PV(CCATS) = [(114,000 / 0.35) * (1.075 / 1.15)] – [(38,000 / 0.35) / (1.15^5)]
PV(CCATS) = 325,714.2857 * 0.934782609 – (108,571.4286 / (1.15^5))
PV(CCATS) = 304,472.0498 – 53,979.18840
PV(CCATS) = 250,492.8614
PV(S) = 500,000 / (1 + 0.15)^5
PV(S) = 248,588.3676
PV(NWC rec) = 450,000 / (1 + 0.15) ^5
PV(NWC rec) = 223,729.5309
OUTFLOWS
Co = 1,500,000, t=0
Addition to NWC = 450,000, t=0
NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
NPV = 3,013,587.433 + 250,492.8614 + 248,588.3676 + 223,729.5309 – 1,500,000 – 450,000
NPV = 1,786,398.193
The base NPV is $1,786,398.13.
9B) Best and Worst Case Scenarios
BEST CASE : )
Q = 35,000 V = 200
N=5 CCA = 20%
Co = 1,500,000 * 0.85 = 1,275,000 S = 500,000 * 1.15 = 575,000
FC = 300,000 P = 250* 1.1 = 275
Addition to NWC = 450,000 * 0.95 = 427,500 R = 15%
NWC recovery = 450,00 *0.95 = 427,500 T = 38%
INFLOWS
CCATS = use CCATS formula
S = 575,000, t = 5
NWC rec = 427,500, t=5
ATOCF w/o CCA= [(P - v)Q – FC] * (1 – T)
ATOCF w/o CCA = [(275 – 200) 35,000 – 300,000) * (1 – 0.38)
ATOCF w/o CCA = [75 (35,000) – 300,000] * 0.62
ATOCF w/c CCA = (2,625,000 – 300,000) * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = 2,325,000 * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = 1,441,500, t=1,2,3,4,5
PV(INFLOWS)
PC(CCATS) = [(Cdt / (r + d)) * ((1 + 0.5r) / (1 + r))] – [(Sdt / (r + d)) / (1 + r)^N]
PV(CCATS) = [((1,275,000)(0.2)(0.38)) / (0.15 + 0.2)) * ((1 + (0.5 * 0.15)) / (1 + 0.15)) – [((575,000)(0.2)
(0,38)) / (0.15 + 0.2)) / (1 + 0.15)^5]
PV(CCATS) = [(96,900 / 0.35) * (1.075 / 1.15)] – [(43,700 / 0.35) / (1.15^5)]
PV(CCATS) = 276,857.1429 * 0.934782609 – (124,857.1429 / (1.15^5))
PV(CCATS) = 258,801.2424 – 62,076.06666
PV(CCATS) = 196,725.1757
PV(ATOCF w/o CCA) = 1,441,500 [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^5)] / 0.15
PV(ATOCF w/o CCA) = 4,832,131.574
PV(NWCrec) = 427,500 / (1.15^5)
PV(NWCrec) = 212,543.0543
PV(S) = 575,000 / (1.15^5)
PV(S) = 285,876.6228
OUTFLOWS
Co = 1,275,000, t=0
NWC = 427,500, t=0
Best Case NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
Best Case NPV = 196,725.1757 + 4,832,131.574 + 212,543.0543 + 285,876.6228 – 1,275,000 – 427,500
Best Case NPV = 5,527,276.427 – 1,702,500
Best Case NPV = 3,825,276.427
WORST CASE : (
Q = 35,000 V = 200
N=5 CCA = 20%
Co = 1,500,000 * 1.15 = 1,725,000 S = 500,000 * 0.85 = 425,000
FC = 300,000 P = 250* 0.95 = 225
Addition to NWC = 450,000 * 1.05 = 472,500 R = 15%
NWC recovery = 450,00 * 1.05 = 472,500 T = 38%
INFLOWS
CCATS = use CCATS formula
S = 525,000, t = 5
NWC rec = 472,500, t=5
ATOCF w/o CCA= [(P - v)Q – FC] * (1 – T)
ATOCF w/o CCA = [(225 – 200) 35,000 – 300,000) * (1 – 0.38)
ATOCF w/o CCA = [25 (35,000) – 300,000] * 0.62
ATOCF w/c CCA = (875,000 – 300,000) * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = 575,000 * 0.62
ATOCF w/o CCA = 356,500, t=1,2,3,4,5
PV(INFLOWS)
PC(CCATS) = [(Cdt / (r + d)) * ((1 + 0.5r) / (1 + r))] – [(Sdt / (r + d)) / (1 + r)^N]
PV(CCATS) = [((1,725,000)(0.2)(0.38)) / (0.15 + 0.2)) * ((1 + (0.5 * 0.15)) / (1 + 0.15)) – [((425,000)(0.2)
(0,38)) / (0.15 + 0.2)) / (1 + 0.15)^5]
PV(CCATS) = [(425,000 / 0.35) * (1.075 / 1.15)] – [(32,300 / 0.35) / (1.15^5)]
PV(CCATS) = 374,571.4286 * 0.934782609 – (92,285.7142 / (1.15^5))
PV(CCATS) = 350,142.8573 – 45,882.31014
PV(CCATS) = 304,260.5472
PV(ATOCF w/o CCA) = 356,500 [1 – (1 / (1 + 0.15)^5)] / 0.15
PV(ATOCF w/o CCA) = 1,195,043.292
PV(NWCrec) = 472,500 / (1.15^5)
PV(NWCrec) = 234,916.0074
PV(S) = 425,000 / (1.15^5)
PV(S) = 211,300.1125
OUTFLOWS
Co = 1,725,000, t=0
NWC = 472,500, t=0
Worst Case NPV = PV(inflows) – PV(outflows)
Worst Case NPV = 304,260.5472 + 1,195,043.292 + 234,916.0074 + 211,300.1125 – 1,725,000 – 472,500
Worst Case NPV = 1,945,519.9959 – 2,197,500
Worst Case NPV = -251,980.0409
The Best Case Scenario NPV is $3,825,276.43, and the Worst Case Scenario NPV is -$251,980. 04.