1
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTINGS
Background of the Study
In the worlds today, building rice retailing business is fascinating. This
kind of business is also earning profit and this profit earning money. Likewise,
this business is dealing with customers want and often become a problem.
We have this thing called loyalty. If there is a customer loyalty it means that
customer satisfaction is present. And if the said terms are applied, it signifies
that your business is working well.
Customer satisfaction is a critical but not sufficient antecedent of
customer loyalty(Dolnicar, Coltman, and Sharma 2015; Kumar, Pozza, and
Ganesh 2013; Taplin 2013). Customer’s satisfaction provides countless
advantages for the company; in fact higher levels ofCustomer’s satisfaction
lead to more loyalty. The satisfied customers will more likely talk about
theirexperiences to others as well. This point has had special importance
particularly in eastern cultures thatthe social life has been formed in a way
that social communication with other community members ismore. Customer’s
satisfaction is regarded as a key factor in forming customers’ immediate
purchasingtendency. The importance of this point is to the extent that
customer’s satisfaction is the most importantfactor in the models of quality
such as European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM).One of the
2
most important structures related to the customer’s satisfaction is commitment
(Ouyang,2010);
Also in the Philippines there are many who manage small businesses
like rice retailing. The common problem of the business that found is the
management of liability. Having many debts is one factor that can affect to the
stability of a business (J.C. 2001).
In Panabo City as per interview of LeidylenRogon a rice retailer of Myffi
store. According to her, they even have a medium of customers who care
loyal to them. However, they have also encountered problems about dealing
with customers wants. And bad feedback coming from the is cannot be
avoided. In connection as a rice retailer ensuring the quality of rice that you
sell leads to customers loyalty.
Statement of the Problem
The objective of this study is to determine the significant effect of customers
satisfaction among Rice Retailers in PanaboCity. Precisely, to look up answer
to the following questions.
1. What is the level of the Customers Satisfaction in Panabo City in terms of:
1.1 Reliability
1.2 Tangibility
1.3 Responsiveness
1.4 Assurance
3
2. What is the level of Rice Retailers among Rice Retailers in Panabo City?
3. Is there any significant effect when it comes to Customers satisfaction
among Rice Retailers in Panabo City?
Hypotheses
The null hypothesis was tested at 0.05 level of significance which states
that there is significant relationship between customer satisfactionamong rice
retailers in Panabo City.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
This study is anchored on the theory of Sulieman (2011) found that
reliability, tangibility, responsiveness and assurance have significant and
positive relationship with customer satisfaction. Meanwhile empathy was
found to have a significant and negative effect on customer satisfaction.
In other words while considering levels of performance in setting
customer, service objectives, service companies need to take into account the
important of customer satisfaction variables such as reliability,
responsiveness, assurance, and tangibility.
Shown in figure 1 the main variable, which is the customer satisfaction and
rice retailers which refers to the business in which they see the good quality of
their products.
4
Significance of the Study
This study is significant for the reason that it would provide information
and can be beneficial to the following beneficiaries:
Owners. The result of the research will enlighten their mind on how
service qualities influence the customer’s loyalty of rice retailers. This will also
serve as a guide to their business in terms of their decision-making.
Researchers. The result of this study may enhance our knowledge to
rice retailers and customers satisfaction of rice retailers.
5
MAIN VARIABLE
CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
Reliability
Tangibility
Responsiveness
Assurance
Figure [Link] paradigm showing the variables of the study.
6
Definition of Terms
For improved understanding of the study, the following words are
defined conceptually and operationally:
Customer Satisfaction. Customer’s satisfaction refers to the ratio that
customer is satisfied with and happy of his/her online purchase experience.
The companies are eagerly seeking value in direct evaluation and tracking
customers’ satisfaction as an important strategic success indicator.
Customer’s satisfaction is considered as an important factor in the success of
every organization and its continuation at the market position. Generally, it is
argued that if the customers are satisfied with the specific products and
services they are using, hence it is likely that they repeat repurchasing and
they might tend to develop the path. Norouzi and Nahavandi. (2016).
Rice Retailer. Retailer awareness is conceptualized as a “consumer’s
ability torecognize or recall that the retailer is a member of certain retailer
category” (Pappu and Quester, 2006, p. 320).Retailer perceived quality is
conceptualized as the “perceptionof the quality of the retailer as well as the
(perception of) quality ofproducts (goods or services) offered by retailers”
(PappuandQuester, 2006, p. 320).Retailing has changed dramatically in the
last two decadesdue to the advent of the online channel and ongoing
digitalization. In specific retail markets, the online channel has becomevery
dominant and can be considered a disruptive development (Christensen and
Raynor 2003).
7
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW RELATED LITERATURE
This section includes the various concepts, theories, ideas from
different authors and reading materials that will provide a relevant framework
of the study.
Customer Satisfaction
As cited, by Hasemark and Albinsson (2004) cited in Singh (2006:1)
“satisfaction is an overall attitude towards a product provider or an emotional
reaction to the difference between what customers expect and what they
actually receive regarding the fulfillment of a need”.Kotler (2000); Hoyer
&MacInnis (2001) also define satisfaction as a person’s feelings of pleasure,
excitement, delight or disappointment which results from comparing a
products perceived performance to his or her expectations. Satisfaction
means the contentment one feels when one has fulfilled a desire, need or
expectation. Furthermore, Customer satisfaction can be a measure of how
happy customers are with the services and products of a supermarket.
Keeping customers happy is of tremendous benefit to companies. Satisfied
customers are more likely to stay loyal, consume more and are more likely to
recommend their friends to the business.
Moreover, Ciavolino & Dahlgaard (2007) suggest that “customer
satisfaction can be defined as the overall evaluation of the service
performances or utilization.”Customer satisfaction can also be measured
using some questions like, considering all your experience of company X, how
satisfied are you in general on a scale from completely satisfied to
dissatisfied? Another question could be to what degree did company X fulfill
8
your expectations? On a scale of much less than expected to much more than
expected?
In addition, Hoyer &MacInnis (2001)satisfaction can be associated with
feelings of acceptance, relief, excitement and delight. Furthermore, Zairi
(2000) says that many studies have viewed the impact of customer
satisfaction on repeat purchase, loyalty and retention and they have all
echoed concern that customers who are satisfied are most likely to share their
experiences with other people with regards to about five to six people.
Additionally, this research is supported by La Barbera&Mazarsky
(1983) who also imply that satisfaction influences repurchase intentions
whereas dissatisfaction is seen as a primary reason for customer defection or
discontinuation of purchase.
As mentioned, by Hoyer & MacInnis (2001) also say that dissatisfied
customers can choose to discontinue purchasing the goods or services and
engage in negative word of mouth.
Since a lot of research has been performed in the field of customer
satisfaction, many definitions have been formulated as to what Customer
satisfaction entails. However, for the purpose of this paper while defining
satisfaction, we refer to the customer’s satisfaction with the stores which they
visit often, with respect to ICA Supermarket Atterdags, ICA Nära and Coop
Forum supermarkets/ hypermarket.
Moreover, Janiszewski and Osselaer (2000)Over the past decade, a
new set of models has been developed to explain how people learn,
remember, and react to stimuli. From these authors we can learn that LMS
learning rule occurs when “the activation of a set of sensory cues is passed
9
on directly to a layer of output units, which in turn map onto a response. After
each response, feedback is received regarding the experienced outcome (e.g.
what really happened) for that set of cues. The system then adjusts the
connection weights between the sensory cues and the output units so that the
discrepancy between expected outcome and experienced outcome for each
set of sensory cues is reduced.” Applying this to our setting means that a
change in customer satisfaction will over time be reflected in perceived
relative attractiveness. Whereas an increase will reinforce the relationship, a
reduction may create switching [Link] addition Johnson et al.
(2001).Customer satisfaction is operationalized in accordance with the
national customer satisfaction [Link] means continuous
improvement. Continuous improvement is the only way that keeps
thecustomer satisfied and loyal. Norouzi and Nahavandi.(2016).
As mentioned by Oliver (1981) introduced the expectancy-
disconfirmation model for studies of customer satisfaction in the retail and
service industry. Expectancy-disconfirmation theory posits that customers
form their satisfactionwith a target product or service as a result of subjective
(or direct) comparisons between their expectations and perceptions.
Customers are directly asked to provide their perceptions or evaluations of the
comparisons, using a ‘‘worse than/better than expected’’ scale. The resulting
perceptions are conceptualized as a psychological construct called
‘‘subjective disconfirmation’’. The expectancy-disconfirmation model asserts
that customer satisfaction is a direct function of subjective disconfirmation.
That is, the size and direction of disconfirmation determine, in part, the level of
satisfaction.
10
Furthermore (Churchill and Surprenant, 1982).When ‘‘confirmation’’
occurs, customers are believed to remain neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.
Both expectations and perceptions also have been found to influence
customer satisfaction and subjective disconfirmation under various
circumstances.
As cited by Horstmann (1998)customer satisfaction with the service
experience will lead to higher level of customer loyalty. States that there is a
strong and positive relationship between customer satisfactions. A satisfied
customer is six times more likely to repurchase a product and share his
experience with five or six other people (Grönroos, 2000; Zairi, 2000); further
unsatisfied customer can banish more business from the organization than
ten highly satisfied customers do (Mohsan, 2011). With higher customer
satisfaction the level of loyalty increases. Tee et al. (2012) found a significant
positive relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty.
In addition Fornell et al. (1996).Customer satisfaction is the central
mediator in the model and is measured as a latent variable with questions
asking the consumer’s overall cumulative satisfaction with their experience
the confirmation or disconfirmation (either positive or negative) of prior
expectations produced by the experience, and a comparison of the
experience to an imagined ideal product/service offering.
Moreover Daniel (2001: P:22) Customer satisfaction was defined by
many researchers and scholars sees that satisfaction is the impression of
reward received by the customer after making the sacrifice of purchasing a
product.
11
As stated by Zeithaml&Bitner (2003), satisfaction is the customer's
evaluation of a product or service in terms of whether the product or service
meet customer's needs and expectations. A customer will be satisfied if the
product or service will meet his or her expectations
Reliability.
As cited by Seung [Link] (2013) in the characteristics the reliability is
represented as a time-based quality concept and the most important quality
characteristics in terms of customer satisfaction. The reliability corresponds
directly to the service outcome and is mentioned as the most important
dimensions of assessing customer satisfaction. The value of services
depends on satisfaction reliability that is identified by satisfaction derived from
the relationships between customer needs and service [Link] reliability
can considered as mode and effects that can be occurred at each step of the
service process. Reliability the ability to perform the promised service
dependably and accurately.
Sulieman (2011) found that reliability, tangibility, responsiveness and
assurance have significant and positive relationship with customer
satisfaction. Reliability the ability to deliver the promised service.
Fitzsimonns (2006) stated that in dimensions of customer satisfaction
in reliability represents the ability of perform dependably and accurately. It
also means satisfaction carry out on time, in the same way and without any
error every time. Tandard at all time, how the organization handle customer
satisfaction problems performing the right services for the first time.
12
Iberahimet. Al (2015) reliability refers to the ability to deliver expected
standard at all time, now the organization handle customer satisfaction
problem performing right services for the right time. It is concern with the
ability of a service provides service on time according to the satisfactions of
customers.
(Parasuraman et al., 1988) Reliability the service provider’s ability to
provide accurate and dependable services.
Tangibility.
Moreover, a study in rice retailers in India (Khan &Tabassum, 2012)
has showed that factors such as the environment (tangibility) was the most
important factor for customer's satisfaction.
Nankervis (1995) the physical evidence of front office staff is including
a personality and appearance of personnel, tools, and equipment used to
provide the service.
(Parasuraman et al., 1988) Tangibles the physical surroundings
represented by objects (for example, interior design) and subjects (for
example, the appearance of employees).Reliability the service provider’s
ability to provide accurate and dependable services. Tangibility the
appearance of physical artefacts and staff members connected with the
service (accommodation, equipment, staff uniforms, and so on).
As cited by Smith and Ennew (2001) nevertheless, there are studies
that a different opinion on the importance of tangibility dimension in customer
satisfaction. Outlined an interesting aspect in his research towards the SQ in
higher education. He highlighted that there is difficult aspect in the choice of
13
satisfaction perception of customer between the affective indignation and the
technical functionality.
Na, (2010) Tangibles The ambience and general appearance of the
physical facilities, rooms, restaurants, equipment, personnel, and
communication materials.
Also Mahiah et al. (2006) suggest that tangibility, assurance, and
responsiveness can increase customer satisfaction towards services rendered
by Human Resource Department.
Responsiveness.
Fianagan(2009) stated that responsiveness is giving customers what
they want, when they want, a price that matches their expectation. Customers
are prepared to pay more for a product or service delivered. Whatever
business, responsiveness is like umbrella covering all organizational activities.
This is so critical since it highlights your brand in positive light. Every message
from customer every query and every communiqués that comes from the
customer would ‘speak’ about they feel about the company, it is imperative for
a company therefore to ensure that notices the feeling and attitude of
customer and respond to them appropriately. Responsiveness a sincere
willingness to assist guests and provide timely service.
Moreover, the result of Ravichandran et al (2010) indicates
responsiveness is the only significant dimension of service quality that affects
the satisfaction of customers positively.
(Parasuraman et al., 1988) Responsiveness the readiness of staff
members to help in a pleasant and effective way. Responsiveness a firm’s
14
willingness to assist its customers by providing fast and efficient service
performances.
Responsiveness was found to be the most important determining factor
in explaining spa customers' positive emotions in China, followed by reliability,
empathy and tangibility (Lo, Wu, & Tsai, 2015).
Assurance.
Furthermore Mahiah et al. (2006) suggest that assurance, can increase
customer satisfaction towards services rendered by human resource
department.
Moreover Hasan et al. (2008) for quality assurance an institution must
train its staff members in a way that may create a sense of facilitation by
means of coordination, cooperation, compassion. In other words while
considering levels of performance in setting customer, service objectives,
service companies need to take into account the important of customer
satisfaction variables such as reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and
tangibility. Assurance knowledge and courtesy of all employees and their
ability to inspire trust and confidence in hotel guests.
(Parasuraman et al., 1988). Assurance diverse features that provide
confidence to customers (such as the firm’s specific service knowledge, polite
and trustworthy behavior of employees).
Wilson (2006) explained that assurance of customer satisfaction
verifies that any customer offering, regardless if it is new or achieved is
produced and offered with the highest standards.
15
Alexander (2006) stated that assurance of customer satisfaction
demands degree of detail in order to be fully implemented at every step
planning could include investigation into quality of rice used in manufacturing.
Assurance was the fourth factor also (feel secure from danger or risk)
and contributed to rice retailers customers’ satisfaction at the percentage of
6.01%. Assurance is related to knowledge and courtesy of employees and
their ability to convey trust and confidence (Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry,
1988).
.
16
CHAPTER 3
METHOD
This chapter presents the research design, the research subject, the
research instrument, the research problem and the statistical treatment of
data.
Research Design
The method that is applied in this study is the descriptive correlation
method. This procedure determines the relationships among two or more
variables and seeks to examine the level of which one or more relationships
of some type exist.
Frankel (2003) and cited by Delos Reyes, [Link] (2010) this method
determines relationship among two or more variables and seek to investigate
the extent which one or more relationship type or exist. It is descriptive for a
reason that the data were presented in qualitative description in rice retailers.
It is also correlation method research because the main variable, rice retailers
and customers satisfaction.
Research Subject
This study focuses on the rice retailers and customer satisfaction in Panabo
City. Specifically, this is addressed to the customers who are buying at the
rice retailers. There is total of 10 respondents who answer the questionnaires.
The researchers used quota sampling technique.
17
Table 1
Distribution of Respondents
Retail stores Number of Respondents
Rice retailing, Panabo 10
Total 10
Research Instrument
The researchers used survey and utilized questionnaire as the data gathering
instrument on customers satisfaction among rice retailers in Panabo City.
The questionnaire is designed to solicit feedbacks on customer
satisfaction. It was presented to the adviser and panel members for the
corrections and suggestions. One set of questionnaire were utilized in data
gathering.
The following scales used for the main variable.
18
Scale Descriptive Interpretation
4.21-5 Very high This means that the level
of satisfaction of
customers is very
satisfactory .
3.21-4.20 High This means that the level
of satisfaction of
customer is satisfactory.
2.61-3.40 moderate This means that the level
of satisfaction of
customers is fair
1.81-1.80 Low This means that the level
of satisfaction of
customers is
unsatisfactory.
1.00-1.49 Poor This means that the level
of satisfaction of
customers is very
unsatisfactory.
Research Process
The researchers used the following steps in gathering of data.
Permission to conduct [Link] of permission signed by the research
teacher and was sent to the head of rice retailing store.
19
Construction of [Link] researchers constructed one set of
questionnaire to elicit the data needed for the study.
Administrative of [Link] researchers administered the
questionnaire personally to the respondent.
Collation of Responses and scoring of [Link] researchers tallied the
responses statistically processed and interpreted.
Statistical Treatment of the data
Weighted mean. This was used to determine the level of customers
satisfaction in terms of reliability, tangibility, responsiveness and assurance.
Mean. This was used to determine the level of customer satisfaction.
REFERENCE
Tee (2012). The Effects of Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction on Re-
patronage Intentions of Hotel Existing Customers, Int. J. Manage. Administr.
Sci. 1(8).
Sulieman (2011) Banking Service Quality Provided by Commercial Banks
and Customer Satisfaction , American Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN
1450- 223X Issue 27(2011), pp. 68-83
20
Hoyer, R.W., & Hoyer, B.B.Y. (2001). What is quality? Quality Progress,
34(7), 53-62.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A
multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.
Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
Khan, P.I., &Tabassum, A. (2012). Service quality and customer satisfaction
of the beauty-care service industry in Dhaka: a study of high-end women's
parlors. The Journal of Business in Developing Nations, 12, 32-58
Lo, A., Wu, C., & Tsai, H. (2015). The impact of service quality on positive
consumption emotions in resort and hotel Spa experiences. Journal of
Hospitality Marketing and Management, 24(2), 155-179.
Zeithaml, V.A., &Bitner, M. (2003). Service Marketing: Integrating customer
focus across the firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Horstmann R (1998). Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty : an empirical
assessment in the service industry. J. Appl. Manage. Entrepreneurship. 4: 39
-54.
Mohsan F (2011). Impact of Customer Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty and
Intentions to Switch: Evidence 2 008 J. Bus. Admin. Manage. Sci. Res. from
Banking Sector of Pakistan, Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(16)
Zairi M (2000). Managing Customer Dissatisfaction Through Effective
Complaint Management Systems. The TQM Magazine, 12(5): 331-335.
Fornell, C, Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J. & Bryant , B.E (1996)
The American Customer Satisfaction Index nature, purpose, and findings,
Journal of Marketing, 60, pp. 7-18.
Oliver, R.L (1980) A Cognitive of the antecedents of satisfaction decisions,
Journal of Marketing Research, 17, pp. 460-469
Cronbach, Lee J. and Paul E. Meehl (1955), “Construct Validity in
Psychological Tests,” Psychological Bulletin, 52 (4), 281-302.
Wilson,(2006),”Quality assurance ‘Retrieved May 25, 2008 from
[Link]
Alexander (2006), “Quality service, Retrieved September 03, 2009 from
[Link]
Gronroos, C. (2000) Service management and marketing-managing the
moments of truth in service competition (Massachusetts, Maxwell Macmillan)