Theological Studies

66 (2005)

SOCIAL ETHICS
MARY ELSBERND, O.S.F.

[The survey addresses recent publications in five areas: (1) founda-

tional resources and approaches; (2) Catholic social thought; (3)
faith and public life; (4) reconciliation and social conflict; and (5)
environmental and economic ethics. Recurring issues include:
praxis-based approaches, the common good and human rights, re-
ligion's role in public life, restorative justice, as well as attention to
the marginalized.]

I N MY SEGMENT of this year's "Notes on Moral Theology," I examine

writings over the past four years in areas related to social ethics. Be-
sides the five areas just cited, other themes could legitimately be treated in
a contribution on social ethics. However, several related areas have re-
cently been reviewed during the past several years in "Notes on Moral
Theology" such as bioethics, 1 marriage and sexuality,2 Latin American
liberation theology including its distinctive ethics, 3 and African moral the-
ology.4

FOUNDATIONAL RESOURCES AND APPROACHES

The most crucial of foundational resources and approaches in social
ethics is voice: Whose voice is heard? Which perspective is published?
Which values are promoted? The racial, gender, and class hegemony be-
hind these and similar questions is specifically raised in three significant

MARY ELSBERND, O.S.F., received her S.T.D. and Ph.D. from the Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. She is currently professor of pastoral theology in
social ethics at the Institute of Pastoral Studies, Loyola University Chicago. Her
book, co-authored with Reimund Bieringer, When Love is Not Enough: A Theo-
Ethic of Justice (Liturgical Press, 2002), received an award from the Catholic Press
Association. She has published numerous articles and chapters in books both in the
U.S.A. and Belgium. She is currently researching the concept of interpreting the
signs of the times.
1
Maura Ryan, "Beyond a Western Bioethics," Theological Studies 65 (2004)
158-78.
2
See the March 2003 issue of Theological Studies for three related articles.
3
Dean Brackley and Thomas L. Schubeck, "Moral Theology in Latin America,"
Theological Studies 63 (2002) 123-60.
4
O'Neill, "African Moral Theology," Theological Studies 62 (2001) 122-39.
137
138 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

contributions: Mary Hobgood, Dismantling Privilege,5 Benezet Bujo,

Foundations of an African Ethic,6 and Larry Rasmussen, "Environmental
Racism and Environmental Justice." 7 Hobgood challenges people in over-
advantaged groups to recognize unearned privilege and to build coalitions
of resistance and solidarity across racial-ethnic lines. Rasmussen extends
this challenge to ethicists, namely the inclusion of all creation and all
human participants in the development and articulation of moral theory,
principles and power analysis. Bujo shifts the context again as he disputes
the universal claims of Western natural law ethics and discusses the foun-
dations and anthropology of an African ethic that "demand the acknowl-
edgment of their own identity in the ethical sphere." These challenges must
cast their shadows through all areas and approaches in social ethics. Hold-
ing this awareness in mind, my following section looks at case study ap-
proaches, interdisciplinary resources, and vision in recent social ethical
literature.

Case Study Approaches

Social ethics literature exemplifies multiple relationships between con-
text and ethics. Authors use a concrete context as a jumping off point for
development of a related idea or resolution. 8 Articles share the results of
theological reflection on a concrete social process or event. 9 Still others
apply church teaching or social ethical principles to concrete social issues.10

5
Mary Elizabeth Hobgood, Dismantling Privilege: An Ethics of Accountablity
(Cleveland: Pilgrim, 2000). Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz, "Burlando al Opresor: Mocking/
Tricking the Oppressor: Dreams and Hopes of Hispanas/Latinas and Mujeristas,"
Theological Studies 65 (2004) 340-63, at 348, includes the dismantling of imperial
discourse as part of the enterprise. Traci C. West, "Constructing Ethics: Reinhold
Niebuhr and Harlem Women Activists," Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
24 (2004) 29-50 demonstrates the richness of ethical understanding born from
interaction between Reinhold Niebuhr and Black Harlem women Communist
Party activists in the 1930s. See also, Wong Wai Ching, "Negotiating for a Postco-
lonial Identity: Theology of 'the Poor Woman' in Asia," Journal of Feminist Studies
in Religion 16.2 (2001) 5-23.
6
Benezet Bujo, Foundations of an African Ethic: Beyond The Universal Claims
of Western Morality (New York: Crossroad, 2001).
7
Larry Rasmussen, "Environmental Racism and Environmental Justice: Moral
Theory in the Making?" Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 24 (2004) 3-28.
8
Nigel Biggar uses Northern Ireland and South Africa as a context for his dis-
cussion of amnesty and retribution ("Peace and Justice: A Limited Reconciliation,"
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 [2002] 167-79).
9
See, for example, Stephen Lowe, "Is the Church Vital to the Process of Urban
Regeneration," Modern Believing 43.4 (2002) 24-31.
10
Joaquim Parron Maria, Moral Catechesis and Catholic Social Teaching: A
Latin American Approach (Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 2003).
 SOCIAL ETHICS 139

An increasing number of publications 11 use case study approaches, built

around a number of recurring components: (1) history or background; (2)
focus or question; (3) organizing framework which situates the concrete
situation in relationship to the thought of others; (4) theo-ethical and scrip-
tural resources; (5) identification of principles; (6) strategies and specific
norms. Two fine examples of the approach are Stephen Pope's study of
forgiveness, amnesty, and justice in postwar El Salvador, and Jean Zaru's
address of the Palestinian situation and the silence of institutional
churches. 12
The case study approach is not without difficulties. One difficulty is
allowing the case study situation to influence the general principles that
emerge from conversations with contemporary thought and the resources
of the tradition. The easy temptation to rely on principles from the tradi-
tion tends toward an application model instead of a case study approach. 13
Another difficulty is moving directly from a thorough analysis to strategies
and specific norms, i.e., bypassing conversation partners and an articulation
of guiding principles. 14 Finally this specific group of surveyed publications
repeatedly challenged churches as institutions to take leadership at the
level of strategies. Since the social sciences have demonstrated both the

11
Many of these components occur in the following: Stephen J. Pope, "The
Convergence of Forgiveness and Justice: Lessons from El Salvador," Theological
Studies 64 (2003) 812-35; Nairn Ateek, "Suicide Bombers: A Palestinian Christian
Perspective," Voices from the Third World: Violence and Global Politics 25 (2002)
121-62; Jean Zaru, "The Demands of Peace and Reconciliation," Feminist Theol-
ogy 11 (2002) 86-95; Anita Nesiah, "The Challenge of Christian Responsibility in
Times of War and Violence: The Case of Sri Lanka," Feminist Theology 11 (2002)
71-81. The following two books are collections of seven to eight individually treated
case studies: Michael K. Duffey, Sowing Justice, Reaping Peace: Case Studies of
Racial, Religious, and Ethnic Healing around the World (Franklin, Wise: Sheed and
Ward, 2001); and Artisans of Peace: Grassroots Peacemaking among Christian
Communities, ed. Mary Ann Cejka and Thomas Bamat (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis,
2003). The following books use the case study components: John W. de Gruchy,
Reconciliation: Restoring Justice (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002); Mary Elsbernd and
Reimund Bieringer, When Love Is Not Enough: A Theo-Ethic of Justice (College-
ville: Liturgical, 2002); Cheryl A. Kirk-Duggan, Refiner's Fire. A Religious Engage-
ment with Violence (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2001); Bujo, Foundations. See also, n.
112 below for environmental case studies books.
12
Zaru moves from intertwined discrimination passively supported by religious
institutions to truth-telling as a guiding principle.
13
Ateek identifies principles from the biblical tradition to guide the Palestinians
("Suicide" 136-46).
14
See Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace and Denis Lynn Daly Heyck,
Surviving Globalization in Three Latin American Communities (Orchard Park,
N.Y.: Broadview, 2002) both of which choose a genre that stresses social analysis.
140 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

potential of churches as intermediary institutions to develop social capital

and the limited direct impact of religious beliefs and teachings on the lives
of social activists,16 this challenge needs to be taken seriously, although not
overshadowing the practices of the people of God.

Interdisciplinary Resources
Social ethics increasingly incorporates resources from economic, envi-
ronment, political, and social sciences as well as other theological sciences,
most notably Scripture and spirituality.17 Janet Ruffing makes a significant
contribution 18 in reestablishing the link between mysticism and social eth-
ics through an excellent history of the relationship. Her research provides
two foundational insights for social ethical thinking. First, mystical expe-
rience provides a liberating and destabilizing alternative to the status quo
through possibilities available to the imagination. Second, biblical religious
experience is characterized by call and mission, hence social change and
spirituality cannot be separated.
Social ethicists turn to Scripture 19 in search of foundations for values and
themes. Curran has also evaluated scriptural use in Catholic social teach-
ings through his study of documents of Pope John Paul II. 20 Curran's
results invite a use of Scripture that encompasses the findings in critical

15
Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Com-
munity (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000) and Sidney Verba, Kay Scholzman,
and Henry F. Brady, Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, 1995).
16
Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace 25-21 \ Laurent Daloz Parks et al.,
Commonfire: Leading Lives of Commitment in a Complex World (Boston: Beacon,
1996).
17
Kirk-Duggan uses the music of the spirituals and the civil rights movement as
an integral dimension of her work {Refiner's Fire esp. 37-54 and 71-92).
18
See the introduction by Janet Ruffing, ed., Mysticism and Social Transforma-
tion (Syracuse: Syracuse University, 2001) 1-27. See also Dennis J. Billy and James
F. Keating, Conscience and Prayer: The Spirit of Catholic Moral Theology (Col-
legeville: Liturgical, 2001); Charles E. Bouchard, "The Good, the Bad and the Prof-
itable: Morality, Spirituality and Business," Listening: Journal of Religion and Cul-
ture 39 (2004) 407-30; Andre L. Delbecq, "Discernment: A Foundational Spiritual
Discipline for Social Justice and Business Ethics," Listening: Journal of Religion
and Culture 39 (2004) 420-30; Maria Riley, "Blessed Are They Who Hunger for
Justice. The Social Mission of the Church," New Theology Review 17.2 (2004) 5-15.
19
Lucas Thumma, "Human Person, Human Dignity and Human Society: Biblical
Foundations and Theological Perspectives in the Social Teaching of the Church,"
Indian Theological Studies 39 (2002) 219-56. See also Daniel Harrington and James
Keenan, Jesus and Virtue Ethics: Building Bridges between New Testament Studies
and Moral Theology (Lanham, Md.: Sheed and Ward, 2002) which addresses some
social ethical issues as well as foundational ethics.
20
Charles E Curran, "John Paul IPs Use of Scripture in His Moral Teaching,"
Horizons 31 (2004) 118-34.
 SOCIAL ETHICS 141

biblical scholarship, cross-cultural and cross-temporal hermeneutics, differ-

ences between general and specific moral principles, as well as distortion to
support contemporary positions and biases.
Credibility in social ethics increasingly requires competence and conver-
sation with political, environmental, social, biological, and economic sci-
entists. In this regard, it is especially encouraging to see structured con-
versations and conferences developed around these diverse conversation
partners and the resulting publications. For example, the John Templeton
Foundation sponsored a symposium entitled "Forgiveness and Reconcili-
ation: Religious Contributions to Conflict Resolution" 21 that brought to-
gether public policymakers and theologians. The Von Hiigel Institute
(Cambridge) and the Centre for Catholic Social Thought (Katholieke Uni-
versiteit Leuven) have organized and published the proceedings 22 of a
series of expert seminars on Catholic social thought which brought to-
gether economists, and Catholic social thinkers. The Center for Mission
Research and Study at Maryknoll 23 brought together theological consult-
ants and peace practitioners over three years for rigorous quantitative and
qualitative research on grassroots peace practices.
Some examples of interdisciplinary works can also be mentioned. Albino
Barrera 24 presents an ethical and historical assessment of economic issues
in Catholic social teachings that challenges both the economic understand-
ings in the documents and the ethical practices of economists.
Vision
A renewed interest in imagination coupled with teleological approaches
may account for an inclusion of vision in social ethics. Vision, or alterna-
tively, Utopia,25 resurrection, 26 God's vision of community, 27 articulates an

21
Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Religion, Public Policy, and Conflict Transfor-
mation, ed. Raymond G. Helmick and Rodney L. Petersen (Philadelphia: Temple-
ton Foundation, 2001).
22
Catholic Social Thought: Twilight or Renaissance?, ed. Jonathan S. Boswell,
Frank P. McHugh, and Johan Verstraeten (Leuven: Peeters, 2000); Work as Key to
the Social Question: The Great Social and Economic Transformations and the Sub-
jective Dimension of Work, ed. Johan Verstraeten, Michael Naughton, and Simone
Beretta (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2002).
23
Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace 5-6.
24
Albino Barrera, Modern Catholic Social Documents and Political Economy
(Washington: Georgetown University, 2001). See also Rethinking the Purpose of
Business: Interdisciplinary Essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, ed. Michael
Naughton and S. A. Cartright (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University, 2002).
25
Isasi-Diaz, "Burlando" 349.
26
Ronald A. Mercier, "What Are We to Make of Sin? Alison's Challenge to
Moral Theology," Josephinum: Journal of Theology 10 (2003) 271-84, at 281.
27
Frank G. Kirkpatrick, The Ethics of Community, New Dimensions to Religious
Ethics (Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2001) 102.
142 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

awareness that a better or alternative world lies in wait on the horizon of

this world. Vision engages more than the intellectual dimension of the
human person in its reliance on dreams, longings, creativity, and imagina-
tion. The connection to social ethics is intuitive 28 to be sure, but an articu-
lation of this relationship has begun. M. Daniel Carroll R. 29 maintains that
the eschatological vision serves as a motivation and an invitation to live an
ethical life (God's will) in the present. De Gruchy turns to the already
in-breaking City of God in Jesus as the source of creative action that
embodies and realizes the not-yet eschatological vision.30 Elsbernd and
Bieringer 31 maintain that human longings, outrage at injustice, practices
and insights around what-could-be provide norms for action in the present.
How these norms emerge is less clear.
Isasi-Diaz provides the most developed effort to articulate the move-
ment from Utopia to social ethical norms. Utopia is "a spatiotemporal
reality that we create in order to have the freedom to envision our pre-
ferred future." 32 This Utopia is a space for a "community of struggle" in an
oppressive U.S. social order. She then develops four dimensions of the
community of struggle in the Utopia space, namely desire, hope, feasibility,
and pleasure. 33 The interaction of these dimensions provides the universal
ethical principle: promotion of life and fullness of human life-liberation.34
In her study of the Human Development reports, O'Connor begins with
their facts and figures, the graphs and indices that measure or indicate
human flourishing. She then moves to moral vision35 that provides atti-
tudes, beliefs and motivations for action on behalf of human flourishing.
This approach looks to historical practices for a vision of what-could-be.

28
Michael Amaladoss, "Solidarity and Struggle," Vidyajyoti 66 (2002) 653-64, at
655 notes but does not develop that "[s]uch a vision also suggests plans of action
that take into account not only present possibilities, but also future dreams." See
also de Gruchy, Reconciliation 209-10.
29
M. Daniel Carroll R., "The Power of the Future in the Present: Eschatology
and Ethics in O'Donovan and Beyond," in A Royal Priesthood? The Use of the
Bible Ethically and Historically: A Dialogue with Oliver O'Donovan, ed. Craig
Bartholomew (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002) 116-43, at 131 and 138; Neville
Richardson, "How Can Theology Contribute to the Quest for Peace in South
Africa? A Challenge for Christian Social Ethics," Journal of Theology for Southern
Africa no. I l l (2001) 41-56 adds character formation.
30
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 210-11.
31
Elsbernd and Bieringer, When Love 154-59.
32 33
Isasi-Diaz, "Burlando" 349. Ibid. 350-57.
34
Ibid. 358-61.
35
June O'Connor, "Making a Case for the Common Good in a Global Economy:
The UN Human Development Reports," Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2002)
157-73, at 170-71 holds up "an ethical vision that places priority on the common
good, the good of the whole,... the hopes and aspirations, desires and capabilities
of all, and especially now . . . of the poor."
 SOCIAL ETHICS 143

The renewed interest in vision requires more thought, especially in articu-

lating the movement from vision to principled action, or vision will remain
a motivation and a dream.

CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHINGS

Catholic social teachings, their history and recurring themes especially
human rights, common good, solidarity, and justice continue to occupy a
place in social ethics. In addition, the connection between theory and prac-
tice is receiving some attention.

Historical Perspectives
Charles Curran's life-long work in social ethics36 has brought about a
historical, theological, and ethical evaluation of the methodologies, anthro-
pological foundations, some themes (political order, social order, human
rights, religious freedom, law), as well as weaknesses and proposals for
future directions. Curran accents the social anthropology that challenges
individualism, the common good, preferential option for the poor, social
order, and the foundations in reason. An unwarranted optimism about
human nature, inattention to the realities of sin, suspicion of social conflict,
and stress on continuity that restricts acknowledgement of error or change
in teachings are evaluated as areas for attention in future directions. Cur-
ran rightfully calls for the use of a historically conscious and dialogical
methodology37 in future development of Catholic social teachings.38 Part
III of the Curran Festschrift3,9 provides a complementary assessment of
Curran's work in social ethics as well as future directions.
Thomas Massero and Thomas Shannon40 supply the historical context
for statements of the bishops of the United States in their collection of
articles from the various time periods on same theme as the official state-

36
Charles E Curran, Catholic Social Teaching, 1891—Present: A Historical,
Theological, and Ethical Analysis, Moral Traditions Series (Washington: George-
town University, 2002).
37
Margaret Pfeil, "Doctrinal Implications of Magisterial Use of the Language of
Social Sin," Louvain Studies 27 (2002) 132-52 correctly illustrates that social sin
already shows such historically constituted shifts in meaning.
38
For additional critiques, see Catholic Social Thought, ed. Boswell, McHugh,
and Verstraeten, especially the articles by Alois Joh. Buch, Jean-Yves Calvez,
Chantel Delsol, and Staf Hellenmans.
39
A Call to Fidelity: On the Moral Theology of Charles E. Curran, ed. James J.
Walter, Timothy E. O'Connell, and Thomas A. Shannon (Washington: George-
town University, 2002).
40
American Catholic Social Teaching, ed. Thomas J. Massaro and Thomas A.
Shannon (Collegeville: Liturgical, 2002). The relevant documents of the USCCB
are here available on CD-ROM.
144 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

ments. Joe Holland 41 offers an analysis of the economic and political phi-
losophy as a hermeneutic for the papal thought from the period extending
from 1740 through 1958. The historical developments that occurred
throughout Europe in the early era of Catholic social teaching are reflected
through ten newly translated articles of the Belgian Catholic church histo-
rian Roger Aubert. 42

Human Rights

Michael Ignatieff s comments in 2001 on the pragmatic political founda-

tions of human rights initiated a new round of thinking about the founda-
tions of human rights. 43 Jean Porter concludes that the concept of natural
rights cannot be detached from its cultural and religious roots. 44 Its original
Scholastic context depended on a distinction between natural law and so-
cial conventions that facilitated the development of international law and
natural rights as prior to and a basis for critique of civil laws. Thus, human
rights stem from a "theologically specific expression of that (human) na-
ture," that is, human rights are rooted in theological anthropology. John
Haughey constructs his anthropological argument for the universality and
responsibility of human rights on Lonergan's understanding of the struc-
tures of human consciousness, namely self-transcendence through conver-
sion of the intellect (my truth), moral values (my satisfaction), and love
(me first).45 Russell Hittinger finds the foundation of rights in munus
regale, that is, the gift and vocation of humanness that precedes political
order. 46 In contrast to an anthropological foundation, Sumner Twiss revis-

41
Joe Holland, Modern Catholic Social Teaching: The Popes Confront the In-
dustrial Age 1740-1958 (New York: Paulist, 2003).
42
Roger Aubert, Catholic Social Teaching: An Historical Perspective, ed. and
trans. David A. Boileau, Marquette Studies in Theology 46 (Milwaukee: Marquette
University, 2003) which also includes a preface by Charles Curran. For other Eu-
ropean assessments, see also Boswell, McHugh, and Verstraeten, Catholic Social
Thought.
43
Michael Ignatieff, "Attack on Human Rights," Foreign Affairs 70.6 (2001)
210-16; Michael Ignatieff, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton: Prince-
ton University, 2001).
44
Jean Porter, "The Paradoxical Status of Human Rights," Listening: Journal of
Religion and Culture 37 (2004) 373-84, at 382.
45
John C. Haughey, "Responsibility for Human Rights: Contributions from Ber-
nard Lonergan," Theological Studies 63 (2002) 764-83.
46
Russell Hittinger, "Social Roles and Ruling Virtues in Catholic Social Doc-
trine," Annates theologici 16 (2002) 295-318, at 310. John Paul II delineates the
munera of God's royal children as self-mastery, dominion over the natural world,
and service to the social world. These munera are prior to social and civil systems.
 SOCIAL ETHICS 145

its Jacques Maritain's nuanced pragmatism, namely a kind of collective

intuitive reason "that has been shaped and tutored by history, social ex-
perience, and tradition." 47 Such anthropological and pragmatic founda-
tions are discussed for their potential toward a universal ethic. 48
Both Twiss and Mark Engler discuss the contributions of the two-thirds
world to the understanding of human rights. In his state-of-the-question
article Twiss convincingly demonstrates the impact of "globalization from
below" to the (a) content of human rights, (group rights), (b) consensus
around abusers and guaranteers of rights (state, transnational corporations,
social movements), and (c) justification for rights. 49 Twiss also provides a
helpful description of group rights in contrast to civil political or socio-
economic rights. 50 In Engler's 51 terminology, the perspective of the con-
cern for the poor rightfully asserts that human rights cannot be used to
justify the status quo and that active engagement with the poor must ac-
company intellectual analysis. Group rights and the perspective of the poor
have clear potential for transforming the practice and understanding of
human rights.

Common Good, Solidarity, and Justice

Some significant publications in the areas of common good, solidarity,
and justice can be mentioned. From classic Roman Catholic tradition (so-

47
Sumner B. Twiss, "History, Human Rights and Globalization," Journal of
Religious Ethics 32 (2004) 39-70, at 64-65 where he develops this position more
fully from Maritain.
48
See the works of Cahill, Porter, Ilesamni, Twiss, and McKeever.
49
Twiss, "Human Rights" 56-63 discusses four justifications: (1) pragmatic, (2)
moral intuitionism, (3) overlapping consensus, and (4) cross-cultural dialogue.
50
Twiss used the term collective-developmental rights to describe: (a) self-
determination of whole peoples to political status and to economic, social and
cultural development; and (b) special rights and protections for ethnic and religious
minorities to enjoyment of their cultures, languages and religions (ibid. 41-50). In
contrast, Kieran Cronin holds that group rights refer to collective goods (land,
language, and religious belonging), and cultural rights ("Defining 'Group Rights',"
Irish Theological Quarterly 69 [2004] 99-115, at 115). This approach appears to miss
the historical connection with access to development and globalization-from-under.
Perhaps the same could be said of James V. Spickard, "Human Rights through a
Religious Lens: A Programmatic Argument," Social Compass 49 (2002) 227-38, at
227 namely "group rights reflect an antisystemic localization that fills the cultural
void left by structural globalization" and can be "based in the distributed decision-
making required of an information-age economy."
51
Mark Engler, "Toward the 'Rights of the Poor': Human Rights in Liberation
Theology," Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2000) 339-65, at 354-61. For two other
international perspectives on human rights, see Liberato C. Bautista, "Asia-Pacific
Indigenous Peoples: Human Rights and Spiritualities," Church and Society 92
(2001) 59-78; and Clarence Dias, "The Challenge of Sustainable Development and
Human Rights," Church and Society 92 (2001) 45-58.
146 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

cial anthropology, dignity, rights, solidarity, justice as participation, sacra-

mental worldview) Hollenbach 52 weaves a theoretical framework for the
common good, based on social goods, a public role of religion, and intel-
lectual solidarity which he uses to rethink urban poverty and globalization.
Taking a more expansive approach, Lisa Cahill 53 draws on intercultural
moral and policy consensus as well Aquinas's practical reason to reinter-
pret a concept of a global common good that could move toward a uni-
versal ethic. 54 June O'Connor's study 55 of the Human Development Re-
ports of the UN illustrates an instance of common good as a dimension of
a universal ethic. These reports participate in normative public discourse to
communicate values to a broad social arena. The common good concept is
embedded in the UN human development initiatives, without the language.
These contributions provide solid theoretical bases for the common good.
Issues of social conversion, indifference to privileges associated with race,
gender and class, and the predominantly Western social location of authors
who discuss common good present challenges for future development. 56
On the other hand, authors whose social location is not Western turn to
the concept of solidarity. 57 Hinga approaches solidarity as a practical
means to right injustices and build more just and humane community.
Amaladoss understands solidarity as a vision that "suggests plans of action
that take into not only present possibilities, but also future dreams."
As a term, justice recurs frequently in the literature, albeit often as a

52
David Hollenbach, The Common Good and Christian Ethics, New Studies in
Christian Ethics 22 (New York: Cambridge University, 2002).
53
Lisa Sowle Cahill, "Toward Global Ethics," Theological Studies 63 (2002)
324-44.
54
See Jean Porter, "The Search for a Global Ethic," Theological Studies 62
(2001) 105-21 which both reviews the literature of this discussion and concludes its
impossibility.
^5 O'Connor, "Making a Case" 157-73.
56
In addition to Hollenbach, Cahill, and O'Connor, see Thomas W. Ogletree,
"Corporate Capitalism and the Common Good: A Framework for Addressing the
Challenges of a Global Economy," Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2002) 79-106;
Ryan, "Beyond a Western Bioethics"; Andrew M. Yuengert, "The Right to Migrate
and the Universal Common Good," The Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 14
(2004) 43-64.
57
Amaladoss, "Solidarity"; Brackley and Schubeck, "Latin America" 144-51
discusses a number of Latin American authors and their contributions. See also:
Teresia M. Hinga, "African Feminist Theologies, the Global Village, and the Im-
perative of Solidarity across Borders: The Case of the Circle of Concerned African
Women Theologians," Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 18 (2002) 79-86; Jon
Sobrino, "The Universalization of Solidarity and Hope: The March for Peace,'
Butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo, 24 February—4 March 2001," in Glo-
balization and Its Victims, ed. Jon Sobrino and Felix Wilfred, Concilium 2001/5
(London: SCM, 2001) 115-21.
 SOCIAL ETHICS 147

comprehensive but undefined concept or as a summary term evoking the

vision that Catholic social teachings and practices seek to embody in this
world. This vision of justice has scriptural overtones, the establishment of
the reign of God 58 or fidelity to the demands of the covenant relationship. 59
Elsbernd and Bieringer 60 present a thorough analysis of justice in Scrip-
ture, the practices of activists, Catholic social teachings as well as selected
20th-century theologians and philosophers before they develop their own
understanding of justice as participation. As shall be noted later, the con-
cept restorative justice is being clarified and nuanced in ongoing discus-
sions of reconciliation and social conflict. Finally, environmental justice
expands the concept of justice as participation to include all creation.

Theory and Practice

Some deliberate attention has been given to the link between theory and
practice in Catholic social teachings. Judith Merkle 61 explores the link
between Catholic social practices and Catholic social teachings by exam-
ining movements, the encyclical tradition and vision as dimensions which
are woven together in changing versions and eras of social Catholicism.
Although Walter Burghardt's 62 structured his book beginning with theory,
before moving to specific issues, it is a memoir of his years of practice in
justice education, preaching the just word, publishing, and reading. Lastly,
the focus on practices, particularly in movements, seems poised to impact
methodological approaches in social ethics as a discipline.63

FAITH AND PUBLIC LIFE

An area of considerable and important interest among social ethicists is
the relationship between faith and public life.64 While the majority of
scholars agree that the church as the membership or as institution must be

58
Riley, "Blessed Are They" 11-12.
59
Walter J. Burghardt, Justice: A Global Adventure (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis,
2004).
60
Elsbernd and Bieringer, When Love, especially chapters 2-5.
61
Judith A. Merkle, From the Heart of the Church: The Catholic Social Tradition
(Collegeville: Liturgical, 2004).
62
Burghardt, Justice.
63
See for example Rasmussen, "Environmental Racism" as well as Herbert
Haslinger, "Was ist Caritaswissenschaft?" Theologie und Glaube 94 (2004) 145-64;
Maximiano Ngabirano, "National Justice: A Challenge to the Great Lakes Region
of Africa," African Ecclesiastical Review 43.4-5 (2001) 229-51 and June O'Connor,
"Making a Case" 170-71.
64
Theologische Quartalschrift 183, no. 2 (2003) devotes five articles and a sig-
nificant introduction to the historical phenomenon of civil religion in various Eu-
ropean contexts including France, Hungary, Germany Poland, Belgium, and Italy.
148 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

engaged in public life, the foundations and the resources for, as well as the
nature and the contributions of, such engagement show diverse interpre-
tations and understandings.
For the most part in exploring the foundations of socio-public engage-
ment, scholars seek an anthropological foundation and frequently a spe-
cifically theological and ontological anthropology. Their discussions readily
include related questions around universality and diversity. Gascoigne 65
finds human worth and sociality in the communio or solidarity of the
Trinity, which is the foundation for an ethic of dialogue, participation, and
discernment. Kirkpatrick's theological anthropology stresses the historical
engagement of a personal supreme divine Agent that reveals the divine
intention for an inclusive human community of flourishing.66 This divine
engagement points to the freedom of human persons to take up the divine
intention within a context of conformity to values and structures of reality,
albeit in a variety of ways that contribute to the flourishing of the universal
human community. Following Balthasar's anthropology, Javier Prades 67
finds an intrinsic link between the individual and the socio-public commu-
nities in the inherent relationality of God with the human person and thus
human persons with one another, including the socio-public communities.
In a more Christological turn, Nissen 68 grounds engagement in public dis-
course in the Incarnation, Passion, and Resurrection of Christ that affirms
worldly reality as a locus for Christian involvement. In another vein, David
Hollenbach 69 draws on the distinction between state and public society as
well as the differentiation (not separation) between religious and secular
spheres to conclude that the public sphere is the place for direct religious
influence. In fact, religious freedom by its very nature requires such active
engagement in the pursuit of truth and common values. The above review
points to a recurring effort to root socio-public engagement in theological
anthropology. It remains to be seen whether such foundations can in fact
bring about such engagement, especially since many of these theological
anthropologists rely more on philosophical approaches than the concrete
experience of Christians engaged in public discourse.
65
Robert Gascoigne, The Public Forum and Christian Ethics, New Studies in
Christian Ethics 19 (New York: Cambridge University, 2001).
66
Kirkpatrick, Ethics of Community. See also Frank G. Kirkpatrick, A Moral
Ontology for a Theistic Ethic: Gathering the Nations in Love and Justice, Heythrop
Studies in Contemporary Philosophy, Religion, and Theology (Burlington, Vt.:
Ashgate, 2003) 1-10.
67
Javier Prades, "The Tribe or the Global Village: Fundamental Reflections on
Multiculturalism," Communio 28 (2001) 348-76, at 367-69.
68
Ulrik Becker Nissen, "Reconciliation and Public Law: Christian Reflections
About the Sources of Public Law," Stadia theologica 58 (2004) 27-44, at 40.
69
David Hollenbach, The Global Face of Public Faith: Politics, Human Rights,
and Christian Ethics (Washington: Georgetown University, 2003) 118-20.
 SOCIAL ETHICS 149

The literature in this area of faith and public life has also explored
resources for engagement in the public life. William Cavanaugh's small
volume Theopolitical Imagination probes the eucharistic action as the en-
actment of alternative space and time which interrupts business as usual. 70
This body of Christ, this public body, has implications for politics, econom-
ics, and social life. Cortina 71 looks to the narrative of covenant as a symbol
of the history and tradition that must be transmitted to subsequent gen-
erations as an alternative that critiques this era's dominant neo-liberal
worldview. Social capital and skills development in religious communities
are another frequently mentioned resource for public involvement. 72 Dem-
onstrating theological reflection as a resource, Stephen Lowe 73 pondered a
concrete practice of public participation, namely a joint venture in urban
regeneration between churches, the political and economic players in
Manchester England. He pointed out that the Church, as a global institu-
tion without primary economic interests, can effectively serve in negotia-
tion and advocacy for those with less power. Catholic social teachings and
Catholic social thought also provide a resource and an ethical history of
engagement. 74
The authors generally agree that adherence to the cultural norms for
public discourse needs to characterize the participation of persons of faith
in public life.75 In his extensive and thoughtful work in this area, Hollen-
bach 76 names and describes two key norms, namely epistemological hu-
mility and intellectual solidarity. Kamergrauzis 77 adds that persons of faith

70
William T. Cavanaugh, Theopolitical Imagination (New York: T. & T. Clark,
2002) 4-7.
71
Adela Cortina, Covenant and Contract: Politics, Ethics, and Religion, trans.
Andrew Gray, Morality and the Meaning of Life 14 (Leuven: Peeters, 2003) in
chapter 1.
7
^ Hollenbach, Public Faith 176-83. Kirkpatrick, Ethics of Community 130.
73
Lowe, "Church Vital" 24-31.
74
Massaro and Shannon, ed. American Catholic xii.
75
Hollenbach, Public Faith 94-95; Nissen, "Reconciliation" 40. Drawing on his
relational anthropology, Prades understands public dialogue as "essential for my
existence, because he [sic] represents other concerns within the horizon of univer-
sality that constitutes us both" ("Tribe" 74-75). This approach tends to instrumen-
talization. See also William Johnson Everett, "Public Works: Bridging the Gap
between Theology and Public Ethics," in Theological Literacy for the Twenty-First
Century, ed. Rodney L. Petersen and Nancy M. Rourke (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
2002) 150-64. Everett finds common ground for public discourse in the concepts
covenant, assembly, household, and nature.
76
Hollenbach, Public Faith 44-50.
77
Normunds Kamergrauzis, The Persistence of Christian Realism: A Study of the
Social Ethics of Ronald H. Preston (Stockholm: Uppsala, 2001) 232-46 includes
distinctive moral practices, Christian particularity, values of solidarity, sin and hope
as his specifications of what he means by "one's own premises."
150 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

enter into public discourse on their own terms, but with the acute aware-
ness that the arena is beyond their own belief world. Although he has
developed what he calls an ethics of communication, Gascoigne describes
the nature of public engagement as witness to the gospel in serving the
world. 78
Given the centrality of theological anthropology, many of these authors
describe the contributions of persons of faith as a counterbalance or an
alternative to contemporary culture. Recurring examples of these faith-
based counterpoints include keeping alive an alternative vision,79 a social
anthropology 80 and specific values. 81 From a structural standpoint, Hollen-
bach persuasively argues that the very presence of religion as an interme-
diary institution in the public sphere both resists efforts to exclude the
religious voices as well as supports the freedom and rights of all persons
against domination by the state or economic sphere. 82 Kirkpatrick also
surveys what society brings to the faith communities in this engagement in
the public sphere. Although he does see the public sphere as a place for
persons of faith to exercise their moral character and implement God's
intended universal community, Kirkpatrick observes that socio-public and
political practices challenge churches to reexamine participation in hierar-
chical organization and promotion of racial justice.
A rather consistent sense emerges among these authors that the purpose
of taking part in public life is for social change and the transformation of
the dominant economic-political paradigm. Catholic and Christian social
ethics have an alternative vision characterized by justice, peace, solidarity,
participation and human rights. Work still needs to be done in two areas:
(1) the implementation of the vision and values into viable structures and
operating principles; (2) the role of churches as institutions in this trans-
formative process.

RECONCILIATION AND SOCIAL CONFLICT

Kenneth Himes's fine discussion of intervention and just war in the
March 2004 "Notes on Moral Theology," 83 including jus post bellum,

78
Gascoigne, Public Forum 184-86.
79
Hollenbach, Public Faith 165; Kirkpatrick, Ethics of Community 121.
80
Kirkpatrick, Ethics of Community 123; Cortina, Covenant and Contract 137.
81
Hollenbach, Public Faith 182; Kirkpatrick, Ethics of Community 123.
82
Hollenbach, Public Faith 142-44. See also Aquiline Tarimo who argues the
paradigm of Small Christian Communities in Africa could be used to strengthen
civil society ("The Local Church and Human Rights in AMECEA Countries,"
African Ecclesiastical Review 43.4-5 [2001] 154-73).
83
Kenneth R. Himes, "Intervention, Just War, and U.S. National Security,"
Theological Studies 65 (2004) 141-58.
 SOCIAL ETHICS 151

makes it unnecessary to address these issues again in the context of social

ethics. 84 An increasing number of authors, however, are thinking and writ-
ing about reconciliation in the context of social conflict, i.e., social recon-
ciliation. Five significant contributions to social ethical thinking have
emerged.
First, reflection on the reconciliation process after social conflict, war,
genocide, racial and class oppression illustrates 85 almost exclusively86 a
praxis-based approach. The South African Truth and Reconciliation Com-
mission process is a frequent beginning point. However, conflicts in
Rwanda, El Salvador, Guatemala, Sri Lanka, The Philippines, Northern
Ireland, Palestine, and Sudan are also discussed.
Second, reconciliation highlights a public and social process. The Truth
and Reconciliation Commission, the Recovery of Historical Memory Proj-
ect,87 and the UN Truth Commission Report in El Salvador illustrate the
public nature of social reconciliation. Third, reparation has shifted in
meaning from an individual effort to undo harm to structural and social
change such that harm cannot occur again. Reparation also recognizes that
the reconciliation process cannot really undo or repair 88 the victimization
and oppression experienced.

84
Recent resources in this area include the following. Thomas J. Massaro and
Thomas A. Shannon, Catholic Perspectives on Peace and War (Lanham, Md.: Row-
man & Littlefield, 2003) which contributes an assessment of individual U.S. bish-
ops' statements on war and contemporary ethical thinking based on the call of
Gaudium et spes for an evaluation of "war with an entirely new attitude." See also
Martin L Cook, "Just Peacemaking: Challenges of Humanitarian Intervention,"
Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 23 (2003) 241-53. See also 169-284 for a
fifth-year evaluation of the "just peacemaking theory" by scholars such as Glen
Stassen, Lisa Cahill, and Simeon Ilesanmi as well as a just peacemaking bibliogra-
phy. See also M. P. Joseph, "Religious Fundamentalism: A Political Strategy for
Global Governance?" Voices from the Third World: Violence and Global Politics 5
(2000) 151-61. See also Theologische Quartalschrift 182, no. 4 (2002) which presents
four articles on the experience of war as expressed by Catholics, soldiers, chaplains,
and subsequent generations.
85
Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace and Duffey, Sowing Justice, present
well researched case studies of Christian response to social conflict and unrest.
86
Norbert Campagna, "Reconciliation ou Justice?" Revue de theologie et de
philosophic 134 (2002) 353-68 rather draws on philosophy of law; Mercier, "What
Are We," draws on James Allison and Hans Urs von Balthasar. See also Fanie Du
Toit, "Authority and Engagement: The Conciliation of Strangers in South Africa,"
Journal of Theology for Southern Africa no. 106 (2000) 1-16 who identifies six basic
Christian beliefs which he finds applicable to "radical otherness" and interreligious
and cultural dialogue.
87
Kuldip Kaur, "Guatemala: The Challenge of Peacebuilding in Fragmented
Communities," in Artisans of Peace 35-66, at 52-53.
88
Donald W. Shriver, "The Long Road to Peace: Truth, Justice and Forgive-
ness," in Incredible Forgiveness: Christian Ethics between Fanaticism and Recon-
152 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

Fourth, in the context of social reconciliation, forgiveness is generally

recognized as the prerogative of persons who have been victimized and not
a third-party pronouncement. 89 Vindication of victims can contribute to
the possibility of forgiveness. Vindication acknowledges the dignity of vic-
tims, reparation of damages, and discovery of truth. 90 Shriver includes the
protection of victims from vengeance 91 and de Gruchy underscores the
importance of hearing the rage, not of passive oppressed objects, but of
real human persons 92 and of acknowledging (mutual) guilt and expressions
of remorse.
This location of forgiveness with the victim raises questions about po-
litical amnesty. In this regard Pope's fine delineation 93 of three models
describing the relationship between justice and forgiveness (including am-
nesty) is most helpful, especially his discussion in the Salvadoran context of
the shift from "amnesty for truth" to "pardon for truth." Some other
perspectives maintain that amnesty for victimizers is acceptable or neces-
sary, even though vindication of the victim is viewed as a primary goal of
the criminal justice system.94
Finally, an integral dimension of social reconciliation is restorative jus-
tice of which there are three dimensions, namely, truth-telling, remem-
brance, and building a new just society. The process of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission in South Africa focused international aware-
ness on public truth-telling as part of national healing after social conflict.95

ciliation, ed. Didier Pollefeyt (Leuven: Peeters, 2004) 133-43, at 139-41 articulates
this well. See Ralf K Wustenberg and Douglas S. Bax, "Reconciliation with a 'New'
Lustre: The South African Example as a Paradigm for Dealing with the Political
Past of the German Democratic Republic," Journal of Theology for Southern Af-
rica no. 113 (2002) 19-40 for a discussion of reparation in Germany and see Union
Seminary Quarterly Review 56 (2002) 85-183 for some significant conference papers
on "Costly Grace: Race and Reparations, Theological and Ethical Readings of
Communities," from the perspectives of African Americans, Asian Americans,
Latinas/os, and German Jews.
89
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 179; and Pope, "Convergence" 822. See also June
O'Connor, "Fostering Forgiveness in the Public Square: How Realistic a Goal,"
Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 22 (2002) 165-82.
90
Biggar maintains that the primary and crucial tasks of the criminal justice
systems are to make right what is wrong ("Peace" 169-70).
91
Shriver, "Long Road" 137-39.
92
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 164 and 176. See also Shriver, "Long Road" 141-43.
93
Pope, "Convergence" 817-26. Another position locates justice in the public,
legal realm, but forgiveness in interpersonal relationships. Disagreeing with this
view (since forgiveness is social) are both Biggar, "Peace" 167; and Frits De Lange,
"Room for Forgiveness? A Theological Perspective," in Incredible Forgiveness
107-21, at 118-20.
94
Campagna, "Reconciliation" 368; Biggar, "Peace" 169.
95
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 148-54; Shriver, "Long Road" 137.
 SOCIAL ETHICS 153

Truth-telling recognizes that not all truth is told, especially the truths of
inaction, indifference, or insensitivity.96 In practice, governments 97 have
not always initiated truth-telling processes. Social reconciliation and heal-
ing 98 have not always happened, particularly when truth-telling is not a
condition for political amnesty.
Attention has been given to the importance of memory 99 as well as
rituals of remembrance. Practices and celebrations of remembering per-
sons and events emerge out of a collective bonding in shared suffering,
grief, and mourning. Remembering connects survivors to victims and en-
kindles the passion and vision for a new social order. 100 The potential to
foster religious intolerance through rituals and symbols is also recognized.
Restorative justice (restitution, reparation) requires acceptance of re-
sponsibility, remorse, asking for and giving forgiveness in order that the
social and structural work of building a new just society may end social and
political injustices.101 Unjust structures need to be removed and just social,
political, and economic structures with specific attention to issues of land 102
and globalization need to be created and implemented. Social reconcilia-
tion can require the development of an infrastructure previously de-
stroyed 103 or de-legitimated. Just economic development and participation
in healing of relationships are integral to building up a reconciled commu-

96
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 154-64 discusses this and other obstacles.
97
In Guatemala, the Archdiocese launched the Recovery of Historical Memory
Project (Kaur, 43); in El Salvador the UN Truth Commission Report was de-
nounced by the President of El Salvador and initiated a policy of "forgive and
forget" punctuated by complete amnesty for all (Pope, "Convergence" 815).
98
Kaur notes that the ".. .social context [is] still marked by a denial of what
occurred. Military impunity remains prevalent. Many victims continue to blame
themselves for what happened. The violence . . . has spawned top-down power
structures and forced people to adjust somehow to new patterns of life rather than
to deal with what really occurred. .. .In this so-called post-conflict society, there is
little if any reconciliation" (Guatemala 64).
99
Pope, "Convergence" 817-26 speaks of social amnesia. See also De Lange,
"Room for Forgiveness" 118-20; and de Gruchy, Reconciliation 178. See Robert
Vosloo, "Reconciliation as the Embodiment of Memory and Hope," Journal of
Theology for Southern Africa no. 109 (2001) 25-40 who insists on reconciliation's
connection to past and future.
100
Janet Jacobs, "From the Profane to the Sacred: Ritual and Mourning at Sites
of Terror and Violence," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43.3 (2004)
311-16, at 315-16. See also Kaur, "Guatemala" 52 who describes reburial and
memorials.
101
Ateek, "Suicide" 121-62; Ambrose Moyo, "Reconciliation and Forgiveness in
an Unjust Society," Dialog: A Journal of Theology 41 (2002) 294-301.
102
Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace especially the chapters on Sudan, Sri
Lanka, The Phillippines, and Guatemala.
103
Bernard Noel Rutikanga, "Rwanda: Struggle for Healing at the Grassroots,"
in Artisans of Peace 132-65.
154 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

nity. Gathering together of persons who have been victimized into an

alternative community 104 may be a necessary step. The concept of a vi-
sion 105 to undergird and sustain social healing occurs frequently. Within
this context, restorative justice has emerged as a justice other than the
retributive or punitive justice of legal systems. It is integrally linked to
truth-telling and forgiveness. In addition, restorative justice includes atten-
tion to alternative structures and new relationship-building that transform
social conflict. As such it seeks a new way of being a people in a context
marked by a past of oppression and violence.
The role of religion and churches in restorative justice has received
attention, while recognizing that religious institutions and beliefs have ac-
tively or passively colluded in social violence. Institutional presence and
resources, 106 the mission of reconciliation, 107 a foundation in covenant 108
between God and humanity, values and beliefs, symbols 109 of transcen-
dence, as well as concern for human persons are recognized as potential
underpinnings for restorative justice. Institutional religion is called upon
actively to take up the cause of persons victimized by oppression and
injustice,110 to build up shattered communities, to become places of hos-
pitality and safety as well as to engage theological, ethical, and spiritual
resources for reflection on social conflicts.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ETHICS

Globalization 111 and interconnectedness characterize these fields of so-
cial ethics. Although environment and economic ethics each deserve a
104
Sathianathan Clarke, "Dalits Overcoming Violation and Violence," Ecumeni-
cal Review 54 (2002) 278-95 describes the theology and practice of Dalit Christian
communities as alternatives to conventional Hindu social order.
105
Ateek, "Suicide" 140; de Gruchy, Reconciliation 190-96.
106
Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace 17.
107
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 80-112; Moyo, "Reconciliation" 298.
108
de Gruchy, Reconciliation 44-76.
109
Cejka and Bamat, ed., Artisans of Peace 17; Jacobs, "From the Profane"
315-16.
110
Nesiah, "Challenge" 71-81; Zaru, "Demands" 86-95. See also Pope, "Con-
vergence" 834-35 who challenges churches to let go of the "forgive and forget"
stance in conflict contexts.
111
The following works treat globalization in a theo-ethical context: Pamela K.
Brubaker, Globalization at What Price? Economic Change and Daily Life (Cleve-
land: Pilgrim, 2001); Martin McKeever, "Afterthoughts on the Globalization De-
bate: Critical Observations on a Hyper-Modern Meta-narrative," Studia moralia 42
(2004) 205-23; Max L. Stackhouse and Peter J. Paris, ed., God and Globalization,
vol. 1: Religion and the Powers of the Common Life (Harrisburg, Penn. Trinity
Press International, 2000); Cynthia Moe-Lobeda, Healing a Broken World. Glo-
balization and God (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002); Stephen C. Rowntree, "The
Ethics of Trade Policy in Catholic Political Economy," Theological Studies 65
 SOCIAL ETHICS 155

more comprehensive review of current literature, the constraints of space

allow only a general overview that outlines approaches to the topic, theo-
logical resources and issues for further development.

Environmental Ethics
Approaches to environmental ethics locate themselves in one of three
broad frameworks, namely, case studies, interdisciplinary approaches, and
religious ethics. The case study method 112 typically presents a complex
situation and a commentary that provides historical roots, similar issues,
relevant theoretical frameworks, and current policies. Integral to this social
analysis must be an assessment of interlocking systems of domination. 113
Case studies invite the discernment of ethical principles to guide future
steps for transformative action. 114 As was noted earlier, case study ap-
proaches are stronger in analysis than in articulation of general principles
and strategies for action. A second framework seeks to address environ-
mental issues through a dialogue or dialectic between the sciences and
religion. 115 Authentic interdisciplinary work takes both partners seriously

(2004) 596-622. Simeon O. Ilesanmi describes globalization as "an emerging pref-

erence for certain institutional and policy practices that are creating and coercively
imposing pervasive but avoidable conditions of material deprivations on many
societies" ("Leave No Poor Behind: Globalization and the Imperative of Socio-
Economic and Development Rights from an African Perspective," Journal of Re-
ligious Ethics 32 [2004] 71-92, at 71). For two other international perspectives, see
Peter A. Sulyok, "Asia and the Pacific: The Impact and Sustainability of Global-
ization," Church and Society 92 (2001) 1-128; and Dias, "Sustainable Develop-
ment." Brubaker and Rowntree would delineate practices in areas of trade, foreign
direct investment and finance capital flow. Stackhouse and Rowntree give a rather
positive view of globalization; Brubaker, Ilesanmi, and Moe-Lobeda call for major
changes. McKeever takes the position that globalization is a meta-narrative that
reduces personal and national agency for needed change.
112
Boundaries: A Casebook in Environmental Ethics, ed. Christine E. Gudorf
and James E. Huchingson (Washington: Georgetown University, 2003); James B.
Martin-Schramm and Robert I. Stivers, Christian Environmental Ethics: A Case
Study Approach (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 2003); and J. Timmons Roberts and Nikki
Demetria Thanos, Trouble in Paradise: Globalization and Environmental Crises in
Latin America (New York: Routledge, 2003).
113
Rasmussen, "Environmental Racism" 4-16 where he describes the systemic
nature of injustice, the mis-presentation of the ecocrisis, and differences in ap-
proaches. See also Earth Habitat: Eco-Injustice and the Church's Response, ed.
Dieter Hessel and Larry Rasmussen (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2001) which raise simi-
lar issues.
114
Gudorf and Huchingson, ed., Boundaries 231; Roberts and Thanos, Trouble
in Paradise xiii-xv; Martin-Schramm and Stivers, Christian Environmental Ethics
47-63.
115
David Toolan, At Home in the Cosmos (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 2001); Celia
E. Deane-Drommond, The Ethics of Nature (Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2004).
156 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

in a mutual search for understanding and collaboration toward an adequate

ethical response. Finally, religious ethical frameworks focus on distinctive
elements that religion can bring to the discussion, e.g., ritual, sense of
sacramentality, stewardship, and covenant, 116 or on religious principles,
e.g., justice, solidarity, and participation. 117 Gudorf and Huchingson as well
as Martin-Schramm and Stivers provide helpful maps of this framework. 118
Several authors have gathered together Christian theological resources
in environmental ethics. Nothwehr 119 has edited a volume of Franciscan
thought drawn from Scripture, the writings of Francis of Assisi and Clare,
the theologies of Bonaventure and Duns Scotus, as well as contemporary
Franciscan environmental praxis. Edwards's edited volume 120 seeks to re-
trieve central theological doctrines as foundations for ethical response.
Deane-Drummond 121 explores Thomas Aquinas and the virtues of wis-
dom, justice, prudence, fortitude, and temperance that link ethical re-
sponse to human agency.
This brief survey concludes by noting several issues surfaced by authors
that require development. First, the context, content, and power dynamics
in environmental racism and urban environmental issues would benefit
from further work. Second, both Edwards's focus on central theological
doctrines and Rasmussen's turn to environmental justice movements argue
that environmental issues have the potential to transform ethics. Since
these convictions require foundational rethinking of method and meaning,
the envisioned transformation is awesome. Finally, a recurring question
probes the extent of the circle of ethical concern. Arguments for the in-
clusion of all creation or all sentient creation are challenged by the failure
to bring the same inclusion to those human persons discriminated and
oppressed by Western and White privilege.
Economic Ethics
Approaches to economic ethics find their starting point in economic
realities, in theoretical or in theological frameworks. The initial discussion
116
Gudorf and Huchingson, ed., Boundaries 17-23.
117
Martin-Schramm and Stivers, Christian Environmental Ethics 37-45.
118
Gudorf and Huchingson, ed., Boundaries 2-16; Martin-Schramm and Stivers,
Christian Environmental Ethics 1-23.
119
Franciscan Theology of the Environment: An Introductory Reader, ed. Dawn
M. Nothwehr (Quincy, 111.: Franciscan, 2002).
120
Earth Revealing/Earth Healing: Ecology and Christian Theology, ed. Denis
Edwards (Collegeville: Liturgical, 2001). See also, Jeanne M. Heffernan, "Catholic
Social Thought and Environmental Ethics in a Global Context," The Journal for
Peace and Justice Studies 14 (2004) 25-42.
121
Deane-Drommond, Ethics of Nature 9-22; Rasmussen, "Environmental Rac-
ism" 21: "Human agency far outstrips the way we even conceive moral responsi-
bility and accountability, much less exercise it" (italics original).
 SOCIAL ETHICS 157

of economic realities serves either to motivate engagement of the issue, 122

or to highlight the interconnected nature of global and local systems, 123 or
to discern some ethical direction in the well analyzed situation. 124 Privilege
at the expense of others' well-bring,125 collusion of traditional Christianity,
and promotion of consumerism 1 2 6 were recurring themes in socio-
economic analysis.
Feminist and liberation frameworks 127 were used quite widely, some-
times with social research. These frameworks could well provide a less
colluded lens to address neo-classical economic models. Theological frame-
works ranged from a "philosophically informed theological" framework 128
in conjunction with comparative analysis to feminist-liberationist reinter-
pretation. 129 Specific economic topics discussed within these frameworks
included: finance capital, gender issues, socially responsible investment,
work, and consumerism, as well as poverty in Latin America and Africa.
The economic ethical discussions found some themes and values in the
Christian theo-ethical tradition that provided norms for assessment of
what-ought-to-be as well as for development of more just economic sys-
tems. Recurring emphases included agency (agency-in-relationship), basic
human needs, sustainability, distributive justice (wealth, power, privilege,
knowledge, and welfare), human rights (socio-economic and develop-
ment), as well as solidarity with and inclusion of the perspective of persons
who are poor. In addition, central Christian beliefs about God, Jesus
Christ, and the Spirit 130 were reinterpreted as foundations for alternative
economic systems.
Personal and collective (nations and churches) agency appears to be a
key issue requiring further thought and development. Perhaps agency

122
Brubaker, Globalization 7-8; Moe-Lobeda, Healing xiii-xiv.
123
Heyck, Surviving Globalization; Brubaker, Globalization 10; Gloria H. Al-
brecht, Hitting Home: Feminist Ethics, Woman's Work, and the Betrayal of "Family
Values" (New York: Continuum, 2002) 8-9.
124
Albrecht, Hitting Home 148-64 draws three principles from her well substan-
tiated data, namely full-equality, inclusion of 'feminine' values in the marketplace,
and valuing families. See also Ilesanmi, "Leave No Poor" 81-85.
125
Ilesanmi, "Leave No Poor" 72-73; Albrecht, Hitting Home 29.
126
Sallie McFague, Life Abundant: Rethinking Theology and Economy for a
Planet in Peril (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2001) 129-31.
127
Ann-Cathrin Jarl, In Justice: Women and Global Economics (Minneapolis:
Fortress, 2003). See also Moe-Lobeda, Healing 5-6; Albrecht, Hitting Home 8-9.
128
Stackhouse and Paris, ed., God and Globalization 1.3. See also Rowntree,
"Ethics" 597-600.
129
McFague, Life Abundant 133-202. See also Julie A. Nelson, "Breaking the
Dynamic of Control. A Feminist Approach to Economic Ethics," Journal of Femi-
nist Studies in Religion 19 (2003) 27-45.
130
McFague, Life Abundant 133-202 and Moe-Lobeda, Healing 73-99.
158 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES

needs to break from Western and individualistic moorings before it can

address globally contextualized economic issues. How do intermediary
agencies in the so-called Two Thirds World understand their agency?
Could that knowledge provide some guidance in reclaiming agency in the
face of mega-economic institutions? Further work along these lines might
well respond to recurring challenges leveled at the silences of religious
congregations in the face of epidemic suffering. The question of motivation
to engage in economic transformation is related. Ilesanmi 132 discusses in-
direct self-defense and solidarity in the global village as two paradigms of
motivational rationale. What roles do non-rational incentives play in ethi-
cal models, practices, or faith formation for engagement in economic trans-
formation?
Environmental and economic ethics are intertwined in ethical theory and
practice, for they are all socially located in interlocking systems. Adequate
ethical responses, characterized by a social analysis of power and privilege
as well as by interdisciplinary praxis, contribute to social transformation.
The development of ethical approaches and dynamic principled action for
social change, grounded in the lived wisdom of liberation movements of the
disenfranchised and those in solidarity with them remains a crucial task for
the future.

131
Bujo, Foundations.
132
Ilesanmi, "Leave No Poor" 86-89 does not discuss the other two motivations
of Richard B. Miller, "Humanitarian Intervention, Altruism, and the Limits of
Casuistry," Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2000) 3-35, namely principled commu-
nitarianism and compassion/concern. Brubaker, Globalization 64 discusses a lack of
critical vision as self-protection for inaction. See also Johann-Baptist Metz, "Com-
passion, zu einem Weltprogramm des Christentums im Zeitalter des Pluralismus der
Religionen und Kulturen," in Compassion: Weltprogramm des Christentums: Soziale
Verantwortung Lernen, ed. Johann-Baptist Metz, Luther Kuld, and Adolf Weisbrod
(Freiburg: Herder, 2000) 9-18, at 16-17.