Peter Turner v4 Billetspdf
Peter Turner v4 Billetspdf
Introduction
Welcome to this month‖s instalment in which we will be taking a peek (mind the
pun) into Billet work. Billet work has long been the secret of many psychic
reader/ mediums in order to gain information there is no way they should
possibly know.
The notion of switching/ peeking billets long pre-dates ―mentalism‖ and similar
techniques shared in this document have been used in the past by several
people (I will not name) to gain cult like status.
I have (up until this point) for the most point kept my thoughts upon billets
and the psychology of all things surrounding billets behind closed doors. It‖s
been something I have not really discussed, not because I don‖t use or utilise
billets but because it‖s something I have kept for myself.
I was taken aback by how incredible billet work can be after reading ―Peek
Performances‖ and ―Peek Encores‖ by Richard Busch (two articles on the subject I
highly recommend) and have been obsessed ever since.
When you read this document the ideas are incredibly simple, so simple that
they are very easy to overlook as relevant because of how straightforward
they are in terms of mechanics. As I mentioned earlier, these types of
techniques have helped people gain cult like status and therefore it would be
a foolish mistake to make to dismiss any of the information you read in this
document as not worth your time. I completely mean that in the least
egotistical sense possible.
Peter Turner
The Psychology of peeking
The most important aspect of billet work is the psychology behind the
motivation for peeking; the participants mind set, the justification (if any)
and placement of the billet within a routine.
Let‖s start with the participants mind set, there should never be a suspicion in
your participant‖s mind that anything is happening outside of what you are
telling them is happening and that boils down to the participant‖s
believability in you.
I have heard comments batted around when giving advice on peeks to people who
are unfamiliar with peeking that range from – “If you can get away with it”
to “they will never catch you doing it” -
These comments not only place you (the performer) into the wrong mind set but
they also make what you are doing a game in which you are expecting to be
caught at some point and therefore your actions will never be natural or
subtle.
Which sounds counter intuitive, but if the participant believes in your ability
and they feel that you really are reading them, then why would they even
suspect that you would peek at the billet?
In the participants mind there should never even be an inclination that you
could peek, they should just see what you are doing as a facilitation to reach
the conclusion. If you can make the billet seem as irrelevant and non-
important as possible then that‖s the way your participant will feel about the
billet also.
There are a few subtle ways to control the participants thinking in order to
make them believe the billet is irrelevant.
One is to never refer to the billet as a billet, card or piece of paper. This is
only tiny and you may think it makes no difference but it really, really does.
The reason you should never refer to the billet as a billet or paper or piece
of card is once you name something you give it an importance. Once you label
the billet (Whether you call it a card or piece of paper) it becomes something
that the participant will remember as it is an integral part of the routine
you are performing.
So what should you call billets in performance?
I always refer to billets as ―this‖ or ―that‖ - “Take this and write…” “I want
you to take hold of ―that‖ and write”, it makes the billet meaningless as it
doesn‖t have a name and is seemingly unimportant to you and therefore it will
become unimportant to them. This is a very small change, but an accumulative
of small changes amount to a big difference. I think I remember saying in an
older piece of work that two small changes amount to a regular sized change,
you will notice in this document how many subtleties are used in combination
to have a drastic effect on the outcome of your routines.
Another way to make the billet seem irrelevant is to guess things that are not
on the billet and make the participant feel that you know the entirety of
their thoughts and not just what they wrote on the billet.
Things that surround what they have written on the billet are just as
important as the information they wrote.
Let‖s look at an example of things we can get for free that stem from/
surround what the participant has written inside the billet.
For the purpose making this easy to envision let‖s imagine we are going to ask
the participant to write something on a billet –
Performer: “I would like you to take this and write something that means
something to you. Make it something that no one would be able to instantly
guess this could be the name of a person, a pet, a number, the name of a
place… anything that stands out as being important but remember nothing that
is instantly guessable”.
Take note here, without doing anything we have opened up the opportunity to
get a hit on the category the participant decided to select.
For the purpose of this document let‖s imagine that the participant has written
―Spain‖ on the inside of the billet. We will peek this information (using one of
the peeks outlined later) and will instantly know it is a place that the
participant is thinking of BUT this is not going to be the first thing that we
reveal.
Let‖s look at how much information I would be able to reveal from this simple/
singular piece of information, first I will outline the script so you can see
how it is going to play out in full and then after that I will break down
each section and outline exactly what is going on in my head and then the
participants.
Performer: “Right now I have no idea what it is you are thinking of, your
thoughts are so vast and deep and there are so many things that you could
have been thinking of. I will just tell you what I am receiving and you can
translate it for me should I need you to help me. This is about your mind
communicating with mine.
The first thing that I am feeling is that that there are a lot of positive
memories connected to this thought. Therefore I really don‖t think it could be
a number as normally thoughts connected to a number to me feel cold and this
has a really warm beautiful feeling connected to it.
I don‖t know if you will understand what I mean by this, oddly I‖m feeling
this is something that you could touch but in my head its saying you don‖t
touch this or you can‖t touch this and what that usually represents is a person
that is no longer with us, or a place…
Participant: “Yes”.
Performer: “You are doing amazingly, just keep telling me in your mind what
you want me to pick up on. Instantly I am seeing a photograph with you and
another person in the photo, you have your arm around this person. Have you
got this photo on display at home?”
Participant: “Yes!!”
Performer: “Imagine the journey and landing in the new country, imagine
seeing the place you are thinking of written as you walk into the airport
after landing. See those large white letters with the name printed upon it.
Are you doing that?”
Participant: “I am”.
This is where you would reveal the place in whatever manner that you desire.
Breakdown
Let‖s take an in-depth look at what is going on here.
Performer: “Right now I have no idea what it is you are thinking of, your
thoughts are so vast and deep and there are so many things that you could
have been thinking of. I will just tell you what I am receiving and you can
translate it for me should I need it. The first thing that I am feeling is
that that there are a lot of positive memories connected to this thought.
Therefore I really don‖t think it could be a number as normally thoughts
connected to a number to me feel cold and this has a really warm beautiful
feeling connected to it.
[Straight out of the gate, I am reminding them implicitly that they could be
thinking of absolutely anything. I also tell them that they might need to help
me at points as I am not going to understand everything I am seeing – Why
would I ever mention this if I wasn‖t seeing anything?
You have to remember that the participant does not know that you know what
category their thought belongs to and therefore why not point out what it is
not to get a free hit?
You can fit this type of thinking into any type of performance, if you know
the participant is thinking of a playing card for example (this is just an
easily imaginable example) – Let‖s say you know it is a heart they are
thinking of you could say –
Performer: “Ok, I am feeling that you changed your mind a couple of times… I
can tell straight away that you dismissed the spade subconsciously and
therefore I 100% know it is not that”.
- That is a hit.
- That is a hit.
Again a hit, you can see the point I am making, I have used what it is not to
get a hit right at the start for free. It is very easy to overlook this type of
way to reveal as we are too quick to try get to the definitive outcome.
This type of scripting all adds to making it seem to the audience you are all
knowing. It couldn‖t be simpler, take a look at the way that I revealed the
information as that is also something that is very important.
I pointed out that the thought FELT warm and normally numbers FEEL cold to
me. This is implicit that you are feeling their thoughts, it helps make the
participant feel what you are doing is real. You will notice all the time I am
trying to elicit that response from the participants, I want to take them on a
journey where they see me whittle in on their thought while letting them know
how I am feeling/ thinking.
“I don‖t know if you will understand what I mean by this, oddly I‖m feeling
this is something that you could touch but in my head its saying you don‖t
touch this or you can‖t touch this and what that usually represents is a person
that is no longer with us or a place.
[Notice how I don‖t jump straight into saying this is a place, the JOURNEY is
the key factor here, I know I keep saying that but it really is important. I
want the participant to feel that I am translating their thoughts and feelings
bit by bit and it is not instantaneous for me (this is implicit that some
thoughts are more difficult that others). I start by saying it could be one of
two things - This itself is a minor hit and then I hone in on what category
I believe the participant‖s thought pertains to, more importantly WHY I believe
it pertains to that category and I take the hit from that.]
Participant: “Yes”.
Performer: “You are doing amazingly, just keep telling me in your mind what
you want me to pick up on…
Instantly I am seeing a photograph with you and another person in the photo,
you have your arm around this person. Have you got this photo on display at
home?”
Participant: “Yes!!”
[This is where I employ something that other mentalists shy away from or
dismiss – Like I have said a lot of times in the past, this is the way that I
do things and it is merely an opinion and there is no right or wrong.
You will notice that I tell the participant that they are doing amazingly…
For doing nothing, the reason I do this is it suggests that they are doing
SOMETHING. I am not doing this to be condescending or patronising towards the
participant. I want my participant to feel that they are sending information
for me to receive, by telling them they are doing amazingly and proving I am
receiving their thoughts and relaying the information to them not only
creates a great rapport with the participant BUT it helps them believe in my
ability and they will be more inclined to be excited and forthcoming with
information.
You will notice I start to use a very typical psychic reader‖s technique; I talk
about an object that they have at home that relates to the participants
thought.
I use a photograph; notice how I imply that the details of the photo are vague
and that I cannot see the person they are with inside the photo. Think about
every holiday or trip you have been on, did you take a photograph with
someone? Of course you did. We usually store these photos on our mobile phones,
females are more inclined to print these off and have them hanging in
frames.]
Performer: “Let me describe what I am seeing, (this is where I would close my
eyes) in the photo you are wearing light coloured clothing, I can‖t see much of
the background in the photograph but the clothing leads me to believe this
place is warm as you are not wrapped up. As soon as I said warm, I instantly
got a really vibrant positive feeling from you, in the picture you are in
front or close to water as I am feeling a cool breeze but only subtle not
harsh.
[During this part of the process I close my eyes, I have made a conscious
effort up until this point not to close my eyes so when I do and start to
portray what I can see it really helps sell that I can actually see things
when I block out visual things out around me.
I have in the past (not so much recently as I haven‖t thought about it for a
while) pointed out why I have closed my eyes. It‖s nice sometimes to paint a
picture in the participants mind of a process that doesn't exist, by simply
saying “I am going to close my eyes in a moment, I am not doing this to be
rude or ignorant, I am doing this so I can block out everything around me
that could potentially act as a distraction and just envision what it is you
are sending to me to be able to deliver a clearer translation.”
This is a simple script but from a presentational view point can add so much.
I also know that the people in the photo are going to be wearing light
coloured clothing and not wrapped up as it is a warm country. There is a high
probability that there is going to be water close to where the participant is.
Notice how I said, “you are either in front of or close to water” this again is
suggestive that you can see things that there is no way you should be able to
see/ know and further takes the participant away from the billet.
I also use the principle I mentioned earlier taking a hit from something that
most would consider irrelevant and overlook. I point out that this is a place I
do not recognise and get a hit from saying it is not in England, this from
your perspective (as performer) knowing the information seems ridiculous but
again remember the participant doesn‖t know that you know the information. So
to them this is a hit and one more piece of information that you can use to
your advantage… I know I am repeating myself here but really take your time
to think about the information that you overlook and can use for free.
There is a valid reason I change the pace and ask this as a closed question -
if the participant says that they didn‖t fly out of whatever airport you call
out, you simply counter with,
“For fullness of vision and just to help me share your memory, where did you
get on the plane?”
It will seem like a question to help you build your vision, NOT like you were
trying to make a deduction; it will never seem like a miss.
If they confirm that they did fly out of the airport you called out, you have
opened yourself up for another hit for free.
All you need to do is know the airport closest to where you are, again not
earth shattering in terms of methodology but all of these small details come
together to aid in creating something beautiful in the long run.]
Performer: “Imagine the journey and landing in the new country, imagine
seeing the place you are thinking of written as you walk into the airport
after landing. See those large white letters spelling out the place.”
[This is the section where I am simply asking them to imagine the writing of
the place, there is a really, really important key point here that is very
important not to overlook and something I consider a mistake that is very easy
to make.
I have myself been suspect of making this mistake in the past. We have taken
the participant so far away from the billet that it would be a crying shame to
bring their attention back to the billet at this point.
If I said to the participant “Imagine the place that you wrote down for me” or
“Imagine this place you wrote down written largely in the air” the
participant‖s thoughts will instantly go back to the piece of card that they
have written on. I really don‖t want this.
It‖s very strange saying this being that this is a pdf about billets, but the
least important thing about a routine in which utilizes a billet peek is the
billet. The idea is to try and take the participants focus away from the billet
all together.
Another little subtlety I have shared here is guessing the wall that is behind
the letters. I know for a fact the wall is not going to be white as I asked
them to imagine large white letters upon the wall, when have you ever seen
white letters on a white wall? It just doesn‖t factor into our heads.
Had the country been Ireland I might have gone for the guess of a green
background but for the most part people will think of blue.
You can see clearly that the utilisation of the billet in this routine and the
information upon it really only play a small part. This really opens up so
many options in terms of direction you can take a routine in and this is the
area I feel should be practiced the most. Learning what hits you can get for
free in the heat of the moment.
One question that will be going through a few readers minds is, that‖s all well
and good but how did you get the information they have wrote down?
The performer then discards the rest of the stack into his pocket and looks at
the participant for a few seconds, without any fishing whatsoever the
performer is able to divine the participant‖s thoughts.
Breakdown
I really like this peek; it‖s probably one of my favourites in terms of
quickness and ease and is totally reliable. Before we take a look at the
breakdown of the peek let‖s first take a look at (and go off on a little
tangent) a question that has caused controversy for the longest of time – Can
playing cards be used in mentalism?
The answer to that question is whatever you make it (as mentalism is a purely
subjective art form) BUT if you answer ―no‖ they shouldn‖t be used, don‖t dismiss
learning card slights. You might be thinking to yourself - how does learning
slights benefit me in anyway shape or form as a mentalist?
Let‖s take a look at a couple of examples of playing card slights and how they
fit hand in hand with billet work.
The first is the top change, this age old classic serves as a good example of
why slights can be so benefitting in any billet routine. I am going to explain
what the top change is, as I know that a lot of people reading this will have
shied away from these types of slights and therefore might not be aware of
what it is.
The top change is pretty much exactly what it sounds like; the top playing
card of the pack held in your left hand is going to be exchanged for a
playing card you are holding in your right hand (without the participant
seeing).
Let‖s imagine you are holding the deck of cards in your left hand (or right if
it is more comfortable for you) holding the, as though you would deal them
around a table when playing a game of cards (this is known as ―dealers grip‖
or ―dealers position‖). For practice purposes hold a playing in your right hand
(or left if you are holding the deck in the right), hold the card just like you
would if you were to deal the card onto the table (holding the long side of
the card) instead of the top side.
Move your hands together and then move the single card towards the deck (like
you are returning it onto the top of the deck), under the cover of this card
thumb over the card on the top of the deck. You are essentially moving the
card on the top of the deck over underneath the card you are returning to the
top of the deck.
Push the single card you were holding on its own onto the top of the deck
whilst thumbing the top card from the pack into the hand the single card came
from. Essentially you are changing the top card on the deck for the single
one in your hand (that‖s probably the easiest way to describe it).
This is done on the offbeat while asking a participant a question, usually the
question asked while performing a top change is - “Are you right or left
handed?” – This type of question is a pet peeve of mine, it‖s a typical question
that makes absolutely no sense in the context of the routine you are
performing.
Another question like this (that I hate even more) is when using a nail writer,
it‖s really strange how we are all conditioned to all ask the exact same
question during the context of a nail writing routine - “Why did you go for
that number?” or “Why did you go for that?”
This question is typically asked during the moment of writing the information
with the nail writer, It‖s one of them questions that really gets to me – If
just because of my ocd.
I love looking at the tiny moments in mentalism that get overlooked and
pulling them to pieces and rebuilding them. This is one of them questions I
have taken apart and rebuilt… The aforementioned nail writing question for
me makes no sense and this is why -
At the moment you are going to nail write asking a question directs attention
towards you, all eyes are on you and therefore even logically when you think
about it this doesn‖t make any sense.
I hate these type of awkward moments, no matter how much you practice it isn‖t
ever going to feel smooth in performance and for me stands out like a sore
thumb (no matter who you are); this is because it lacks thought, construction
and choreography. It‖s even worse when it is being recorded and played back as
the focus is on you.
Here is a simple fix, let‖s pretend we have got to the point of using the nail
writer, the context of the routine in which we will imagine is that the
participant is going to guess a two digit number you are thinking of
(Spectator as mind reader or you influencing them).
You have handed the participant the pencil and you are being very open
handed and you are holding the billet in your right hand at head height,
Participant: “23”.
Performer: “The really interesting thing is just how unique a thought is, IF I
had of asked anyone else in this room they would have gone for a completely
different number, to press my point what number would you have gone for?”
Everyone‖s attention for a few seconds goes to that random member of the
group.
Random: “17”
As he says seventeen write in the digit your participant said (In this case it
was 23), pass the billet into your left hand (numbers still facing away from
the audience) and hold the billet at the tips of your first and middle finger
above your head – This will make it seem totally out of the way and is
implicit that you cannot tamper in anyway with it.
Performer: “If I had of chosen anyone else their answers would have been
totally different and the outcome would have been entirely different”.
Bring the billet down and hand it to the participant face down.
It‖s a very simple change that makes a massive difference, the attention is
deflected away from you, not directed towards you and you have actively
involved more members of the audience and seemingly made the effect a little
bit more impossible by pointing out how different the outcome could have been
if you had of chosen anyone else right before the moment of the reveal.
The left hand is the hand that is handing the billet to the participant is
clean and extended above the body meaning you can cleanly ditch the nail
writer from your right hand without having to give it a second thought as all
of the focus is on the left hand and the billet. Note*** If your left hand is
your dominant hand then you would use opposite hands to the ones depicted
above, this is described for the right handed performer.
All in all you can see how it makes the presentation much nicer and makes the
performance simpler for the performer leaving you more time to clean up
because of the choreography.
Back to the top change, it is the same asking a question that is directive
towards your hands for me makes no sense whatsoever – If there is a pen on
the table ask them to take the pen and uncap it, then sign the back of the
card.
The participant‖s attention is away for a few seconds and it is in this moment
the change should be made, it should be gentle and elegant and not look like
anything has happened at all.
I know I am still talking about the top change being used with playing cards
but replace the playing cards with a stack of billets and you can still
perform the same move, they are roughly the same size and handle more or less
the same (they are just less slippery).
Imagine from this point if the participant takes the stack of billets signs
what they believe is their billet and then caps the pen and places the billet
they believe to be theirs face down on the table. They have left their actual
billet on the top of the stack for you to access in your own leisure.
In shore what has just happened is - You pick the participants billet up
keeping it facedown, start to place the billet on the top of the stack, this is
the moment where you would ask the participant to pick up the pen and uncap
it.
You execute a ―Top change‖, dropping the ―dummy billet‖ (A dummy billet is a
billet with nothing on, one you have switched in place of the participant‖s
billet) onto the top of the stack and hand the participant the full stack
asking them to sign the back of their card.
Things are interesting when you look at them from the participant‖s
perspective.
You have picked the card up from the table, they have picked up the pen, you
place that card on the top of the stack and then hand them the stack asking
them to sign their card.
That split second is all it takes to change their reality, which I think is a
totally crazy thing in itself. Something as simple as this can change someone‖s
entire reality!?!?
What‖s even crazier is that this is all because we have utilised a playing card
slight. Take a look at these types of slights, honestly this is where the gold
resides. Look at simple playing card changes, palms and switches I promise you,
you won‖t regret it.
Let‖s get back to the peek I was meant to explain before I got off on a
tangent.
This peek is another peek that uses an old playing card technique, and as I
said earlier it is a favourite of mine for its sheer simplicity and ease of
use.
For brevity of explanation lets imagine you have become acquainted with the
participant and you are at the point of asking them to write something down.
Take a stack of business cards; hold them in your left hand in dealer‖s
position/ grip (described earlier) and make a break underneath the top two
cards with your pinkie. There is no rush while doing this do this while you
are talking to the participant.
Place the cards behind your back and ask the participant to write/draw on the
card.
When the participant has finished flip over the two top cards as one (like
turning over a double lift) while saying,
Point to where you want the participant to sign, remember this is still all
going on behind your back.
[There is a subtle dual reality going on at this point because the audience
never see you flip the cards, so they assume you are just asking the
participant to sign the card. There are further layers of deception in a
moment.]
The participant believes that they are signing the back of their card in
reality their card is the second card down they are signing the back of a
dummy.
After they have signed the back of the dummy billet, pick it up and fold it in
half. Extend the folded billet to the participant,
Performer: “I want you to take this and fold it and then keep it held tight in
your hand”.
[This is again another subtle layer of dual reality as the audience believe
that the participant has picked up the billet and folded the billet themselves.
The way the audience perceive what has just occurred is that the participant
has written on the billet, signed it and folded it themselves.
I have had a couple of people express concern that the participant will open
the billet and see that it is blank. Why would they ever do that if they
believe it is their billet?
If you give the participant clear instruction to fold it and hold it tight
they will do exactly what you ask them to do. It is all about audience
management. The participant is now holding a dummy billet and you are holding
the stack with their card on the top.]
In reality, all you are doing is taking the participants card from the back of
the stack and moving it to the face and when you bring the cards back from
around your back you will know the information that the participant is
thinking of by looking at the card on the face.
The one issue I had with this peek initially was the clean-up, the participant
is still holding the dummy and if you guess the information verbally there is
always the chance that they could open the billet.
Here are a couple of ways to tie up the peek so you end the routine cleanly.
The first way is to guess what the participant is thinking and take the folded
billet back and pocket it – Which is not very appealing and not recommended.
The second way - the way I always do this now is, whilst the stack is still
behind my back, the participant has taken the folded dummy, I flip over the
top card (the participants card) so it is face up on the top of the stack. When
I bring the cards out from around my back, I keep the stack facing me the
entire time and pocket the cards.
In the motion of looking at my pocket to guide the stack in, that‖s where I get
my peek.
After ―reading the participant‖ I reach into my pocket pulling one card out,
ensuring that this isn‖t the participant‖s card and write whatever the
participants thought is (the information I peeked).
I then fold the card into quarters (the same as the dummy billet the
participant is holding) I hand them my billet proclaiming I have committed
and extend my hand to take the billet they have signed (the dummy).
I open the dummy billet keeping it towards me (as I know it is blank) I then
rotate the billet, like I have opened the billet upside down – I do this because
it is an implicit action, why would I rotate the billet if there was nothing
on it?
I then call out whatever information I know the participant is thinking of,
like I have just read it off of the dummy billet. I then tear up the billet
into pieces, and pocket the pieces, ask them to open what I committed to.
Of course it matches!
This means that you don‖t need to hold the break you can hand the stack to the
participant have them write whatever he/ she wants and then they place the
stack back into your hands and you can cleanly flip the two cards over and
have them sign the back.
It‖s the openness of the flipping of the cards and the fact that you can let
them hold the cards when writing that makes the difference.
It‖s only a small difference, but as I have said a multitude of times its the
smallest differences that make the biggest changes in the long run.
Credit
Astronomical – Tony Corinda
Envelope peek
A large manila envelope is placed on the table and verified opaque, a smaller
envelope is removed from inside the envelope on the table and that is also
verified opaque.
The participant is asked if they know the contents of the smaller envelope to
which they reply they don‖t, the envelope is emptied to show a business card
which is also verified opaque.
The participant writes or draws something on the business card and places it
face down on the table while the performer looks away.
The card is then sealed in the smaller envelope; the smaller envelope is sealed
in the larger envelope and is handed to the participant.
Breakdown
This is a peek that is great for a one person Q+A, pre-show work and the
additional clean up I have added ensures that everything is examinable now in
the end.
Firstly I will explain how the peek works and then I will get into the
mechanics/ choreography.
The secret to this peek is hidden in the smaller envelope, the smaller envelope
is a ―coin envelope‖ or ―penny envelope‖ to prepare this envelope place a billet
inside the coin envelope and lay it onto a table address side up.
Fold the flap of the envelope back on itself, underneath the flap is where you
are going to make a slit. The flap is the key to making the envelopes
―examinable‖. Make the slit wide enough to slide a business card in and out.
Slide this card into the envelope; remember which side you orientated the
writing as this is going to be essential later on. Then fold the flap so it is
covering the slit and then place this penny envelope inside the larger
envelope.
Performance
We will go from the point that the performer is acquainted with the people he
is performing for.
Performer: “You are going to act as the eyes of the group, firstly, by looking
at this envelope (the performer hands the envelope to the participant) can you
tell me what is inside?”
Performer: “Finally, can you tell me what is written on the reverse side of
this piece of card?”
Participant: “No”.
Performer: “I think we have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that each
article displayed is entirely opaque, what I am about to show you is going to
be demonstrated under strict test conditions”.
The performer turns over the card to display the word Hello.
Performer: “I would like you to take this and write a piece of information you
don‖t think I could just instantly guess and then place it writing side down
back onto the table when you have finished”.
The participant writes some information on the business card and places it
face down on the table.
When the participant has written the information and placed the billet face
down on the table reach down and slide the billet into the envelope but
instead of letting it ride down the inside of the envelope let it go through
the slit and proceed to push the card – To the participant it will look like
you are sliding the card inside the envelope they have just verified.
Close the flap on the envelope so it looks like you are sealing the billet
inside the penny envelope.
Just so you can see what this is going to look like from both perspectives
here are two photos. The first is from the participants perspective the second
is from the participants.
This penny envelope would then be sealed inside the larger envelope, I usually
wait until I am guiding the penny envelope into the larger envelope to get my
peek, this is because the peek is naturally in my line of vision at this point
and I am not oddly looking for the peek at the wrong moment causing a
suspicion in the participant‖s mind.
This should be the same for any peek, waiting until there is a logical moment
to look at the billet. Don‖t rush this, wait till the billet is in a natural
position to peek it. Don‖t ever force the direction you look in and don‖t be
scared to get close to the information written on the billet, hitting by
association – This will be taken as a hit and at the same time, why would you
purposefully not hit if you had seen the information?
For example if the participant wrote the word ―France‖ and you picked up on
the Eiffel tower this would be associated and never be classed as a miss.
Anyway back to the peak.
After placing the penny envelope in the larger envelope seal it. You are now
free to reveal the information in any way you choose.
To clean up so everything is examinable, keep your eye on the way you place
the penny envelope into the larger envelope. Remember the side the slit is at.
When you are ready to confirm to the audience that your thoughts were correct,
tip the large envelope so that the smaller one inside falls to the bottom and
then tear the large envelope open ensuring that you are tearing the coin/
penny envelope simultaneously along (or as close to) the slit as possible.
In short when you tear the large envelope, you will tear the coin envelope
also and therefore all the pieces can be displayed as the slit envelope will be
destroyed.
The Pac-man peek
This is by far the simplest of all of the peeks that will be outlined in this
document.
Start by folding the billet in half BUT don‖t fold it down the middle of the
billet place the crease about 10mm from the center. Fold where I have placed
the dotted lines.
This is a view of the billet on its edge, notice how there is a bubble.
You will notice that if you hold the billet between your first and middle
finger it remains closed.
The participant is going to write on the top half of the billet, the bottom
half you are going to fill out (as described later). The bottom half I placed
an ex (this is from the participant‖s perspective).
If you close the billet (after the participant has wrote their information) -
Then turn the billet towards yourself holding the billet loosely you will
notice that the billet opens giving you a window of opportunity to peek.
It is done simply on an offbeat, if you are worried about the peek you could
always ask the participant to hold their hand out, lift their hand with your
left hand so it is above your hands and then apply the billet peek underneath
their raised hand while going to place the billet into their hand.
I never really worry about such things remember the participant is never
expecting you to look and so the move will totally go unnoticed.
I will write in block capitals the word ―Hello‖, this ensure the participant can
clearly see where/ how I want them to write and at the same time ensure they
cannot write in the bottom half of the billet.
This is a simple yet elegant way to kill two birds with one stone, if you find
that you have a peek you already use where you need to restrict your
participant, this is the perfect justification for restricting the participant
in a natural and simple way.
The lotus leaf peek
Why this was named the lotus leaf I do not know as it doesn‖t resemble a lotus
leaf at all. This is a peek that I haven‖t used for a very long time, but it
works and like all peeks there is a right time to use it and a wrong time (it‖s
situational)
The motivation for this peek is very juvenile in thinking but that‖s why this
works so perfectly and will totally be overlooked by the participant.
The context of the routine that I fit this peek into is the thing that makes
the peek fly under the radar, there is no real skill required in getting the
information and the area of the billet that you get a peek of is of a good
proportion.
This peek is not for everyone for those who try this; you will love it as it
is simple and totally effective. For those who do not, you might get some
inspiration out of it in some sense.
Effect
The performer proposes to take the participant back in time to their school
days, days where the participant was young wild and free. The performer asks
the participant to write down the name of their first kiss and pass it under
the table to one of their friends sat at the table, just like they would when
they were passing on notes in secret in the classroom.
After the participant hands the note to a friend of theirs the friend is asked
to open it and keep the content of the note to themselves.
The performer starts to describe the participants feelings at the time of the
first kiss, he starts to describe what the participants date at the time looked
like and finishes by revealing the first and last name of the participants
date!
Breakdown
The method for this is ultra-simple; the presentation (listed after the peek) is
where the subtleties really come into play.
Essentially you have just folded the billet in half. After you have folded the
billet in half, it‖s time to fold the both edges back on themselves. To get this
to make sense imagine the billet in two halves pretend each half of the billet
is a different entity. Take the first half and fold the billet in half again
(back on itself) then do the same to the other side. This is very difficult to
describe in words hopefully looking at the next photo you will understand.
What you have now is a billet that almost resembles the letter ―T‖
The participant is going to write on the inside of the letter T, when the
billet is closed it looks like this.
If you fold the billet inside out from the front it will look the exact same
from the participant‖s perspective as it did when folded (details on how to
fold inside out after the next two photos). This next photo is the billet folded
inside out, you can see how much it looks the same as the folded billet.
But from the performers perspective this is what he sees, note** you would be
holding the billet vertical vertical so you can see the participants
information they would be seeing the folded front. This photo is literally to
show you the size of the peek area.
As you can see you get a nice large peek of what the participant has wrote. To
fold the billet inside out, let the flaps fold flat – This would be done one
handed in performance.
Play with folding and unfolding the billet - If you place your thumb inside
the billet (where the participant‖s writing is – inside the letter ―T‖) and let it
roll naturally around your thumb, you will notice the billet turns inside out
and you have essentially enabled yourself to access the peek. If you put your
thumb back into the participants writing and push the billet will close itself
again.
In performance the actions are going to completely be justified and will fit
into the context of the routine as you will be using a table to hide the peek.
This can be done in the open but requires more work.
Let‖s take a look at how this type of peek fits into performance.
Performance
Performer: “One thing that I find interesting is memories, we all try to find
ways to share our memories with our friends, and we take photos of everything
from food to footwear just to be able to let people look into our world at
almost any time of the day.
Performer: “What if I told you that there is a way to access those memories,
it‖s a little unconventional but I promise you the results are incredible. Which
of you would be happy to try this out?”
One member of the group nominates himself to share a memory with the group.
I want you to take this (the performer hands the participant the billet); we
are going to pretend we are in a school classroom. I want you to write the
name of your first kiss on there. Remember at school when we used to take
notes and place them under the table and pass them around?”
[This is where you will get the peek, as you say “Remember at school when we
used to take notes and place them under the table”. You are going to place the
billet under the table and then open it up (rotate it as described in the peek
photographs) bring the billet back out facing the participant, to them it will
look the exact same as when you placed it under the table but you are peeking
at the information while they still think they are seeing the same side of the
billet.
Don‖t make it overly obvious you are looking at the information; remember the
rule of placing the billet into a natural line of sight when looking at the
information. When you place the billet under the table make a conscious effort
to look into the eyes of the group, this will be implicit you are not looking
at the billet in anyway.]
Performer: “I want you to hand this to anyone under the table, whoever
receives it I want you to open it up and take a look at the information, this
means there are two people that know the information and me and the rest of
the group are in the dark”.
The participant hands the note to someone underneath the table, that person
opens the billet and reads the information on the inside and folds it back up.
Performer: “The first thing I am feeling is that in this memory you are about
12/ 13 and this memory took place outside right?”
[This is a very simple verbal swerve, guessing the age of the participant is
the riskier guess out of the two statements, based on probability there is a
massively higher chance of the kiss being outside than inside (I determine this
data based on the amount of times I have performed ―first kiss routines‖). By
placing the age statement first and then continuing to talk without asking for
confirmation for the age and then finishing by asking if the memory took
place outside (which will give you a yes, trust me) the participants ―yes‖ from
the audience‖s perspective will confirm both of the statements!
I call this principle the ―Confirmation principle‖ I have gone into detail in
my other literature on how to use this principle in much greater ways. You can
use this in many other ways, I urge you to experiment with it and see how
many different ways you can come across uses for it. ]
[Let them answer yes or no, we are hoping for a yes here as it gives us some
leniency when we try to guess the description of the first kiss. If you get a
no, then move straight onto to the next section of scripting and skip trying
to guess the description, being honest I will always take the bolder option and
go for the guess, I am not afraid of missing.
If you ask the participant not to say anything out loud and just listen, then
give them a description and ask them to focus on the name without asking for
confirmation of the description you can then nail the name and have the
audience assume your description was right based on the participant‖s reaction
toward you guessing the name. I have in the readings document outlined how
this technique can be used in depth.
This is a simple way to get around having to guess the description but in all
honesty you can‖t go far wrong.
This is how I deal with the description (if the participant has admitted that
they are torn between two names – Which you will find is the case most of the
time.)
Performer: “You‖re not thinking of the dark haired female right now are you?”
[Lead with a closed question while smiling, this enables you to be able to use
another verbal swerve – If the person says yes they are thinking of the dark
haired female this is great, you respond with “I thought so” if the participant
says ―no‖ you then quickly counter with “ah so you‖re thinking of the female
with the hard (or soft depending on the name) first letter of the name”.
IF you got a yes for the dark haired line, follow up by saying –
[Again we are using the ―Confirmation principle‖ they will confirm the soft/
hard sounding letter and the audience will perceive the rest to be accurate
also. I outlined in the Portugal notes the exact way to be able to reveal
someone‖s hobby as a child, this would fit perfectly here.)
The participants memory will be vague anyway, dependant on the age of the
participant it will have been a while since they even gave this memory a
thought and when put under pressure they don‖t want to appear to have
forgotten, a lot of the time they will let you fill in the blanks for them to
save them looking stupid.
Don‖t rush in and reveal the name instantly, it would be a wasted piece of
information.
Think about your own experience with your first kiss; think about how you
felt at the time, if you describe the way that you felt at the time of your
first kiss, the likeliness is that your feelings will match the participants.
Take your time to really paint a picture of the scene, and then proceed by
addressing the participant,
Performer: “I want you to close your eyes for me; I want you to imagine all
the thoughts that were running through your head at the time this memory took
place. Slowly open your eyes and look towards me”.
This is where you decide how you want to proceed, if you are going for the
tada style performance, write the name down on a billet and slide it forward
facedown. Ask the participant what the name is and let them turn around the
piece of card to reveal your thoughts were correct.
If you want to come across as a reader or more esoteric performer then simply
reveal the name verbally. This has a more real feel to it, choosing who you
are as a character is the deciding factor in how you choose to reveal the
information.
Additional ideas
The performance of this type of piece is great, even just for the versatility.
If there are a few audience members on the table there is an interesting thing
you can do from a performance point of view. After you have gained the
information via a peek, you can get everyone on the table involved in trying
to read the participant.
Instead of you deducing if the memory was outside or inside, put it to a vote
for the audience members at the table –
Performer: “I want you all to use your feelings to share this memory, take
your time to feel whether you think this memory took place indoors or
outdoors. How many of you feel this memory took place indoors by show of
hands?”
Ask the participant after the voting process to say if the memory took place
indoors or outdoors.
Do this for the colour of the first kisses hair - light or dark.
Anything you can think of that is a binary opposite that pertains to the first
kiss that you can get the participants to vote on do as it gets everyone
involved. This keeps the members of the audience interested in what is going
on and at the same time it alleviates you from any misses that could occur
during the guessing of the memory.
The readings document should have all the information you need on reading a
participant to add to this type of routine.
Another additional thought for the ―Lotus leaf peek‖ that adds an extra fooling
layer is to get the participants to make a simple drawing on each of the flaps
on the billet like a shape or something that they will recognise.
So when you fold it inwards on itself the drawings will still be on the
outside of the flaps – This just adds a further convincer when executing the
peek that the billet is still closed.
Contributions
The next section of this document is dedicated to looking at several peeks
shared by good friends of mine from within the mystery arts. Each one of them
has a very different way to do things; I feel this can only be a good thing
for you the reader as it gives you a versatility of different thoughts to
process and pick and choose from to fit your style.
This peek of a business card/blank card is very handy when you have 2 cards
as one and you want to secretly see the content of one of them I use this peek
in the context of one of my Drawing Duplications called “Only 2 DD”, but you
can use it whenever you see it fit. This technique is called that way due the
hand position that I take when I do the secret move. I use various motivations
to do it, just create your own coherent one with your effect.
(Photo 1)
(Photo 2)
(The participant in this case is named Pablo… yes… very cool coincidence).
(Photo 3)
Now you need to simply lift your top card secretly and peek the information.
In the action of putting the hands together like a prayer, you will bend the
top card.
(Photo 4 and 5) The angles are very good using this move.
(Photo 4)
Participant`s POV
(Photo 5)
(Photo 7)
You can use this with or without the square on the bottom, it´s your choice. I
prefer to do it in that way because it allows me to keep the information
restricted in one area.
If you want to learn a routine with this technique, you can search for my
“Only 2 DD” piece.
PETER‖S NOTES***
This is a very simple, but very effective peek when we read these peeks on
paper they almost seem too easy to work in the real world or bold but in
reality they do work and are simple. The moment you worry about peeking or
create an awkward action is the moment the participant will feel/ know
something is wrong.
Another thing I want to mention about this peek is you will notice the
participants card is face up whilst the rest of the stack is facedown. There
are a couple of ways to achieve this and both are again brought over from the
playing card world.
One is the half pass and the other is the flop switch or flop turnover.
The flop switch is the easier of the two moves; the participant places his card
face down on the top of the stack of billets. On an offbeat as you go to place
the cards onto the table turn your wrist over flipping the entire stack.
And ignore the cards for a few seconds, while you start to deduce the
participant‖s thoughts, without even looking at the card (this will be described
later). It‖s a simple case of picking the cards up off of the table and
applying the peek.
In this scenario you can as an additionally subtlety use the flop switch and
ask them to sign the back of the card that‖s on top of the stack (they will
assume this is their card) – With this type of peek signing the card has its
advantages and disadvantages.
One advantage is that when you go to apply the peek the participant thinks
they are seeing their signature, you cover the cards and then remove your
hands (applying the prayer peek) and they still see their signature because the
move has lasted just a few seconds in their mind literally nothing has
happened.
The disadvantage is that you are left with a dummy billet with a signature on
it and therefore have to add a phase to clean the routine up at the end. You
can use the same ending as the ending in ―Peek a boo‖ to clean this up, but
again it is adding an additional phase.
The half pass variation would essentially be where you ask the participant to
place their card on the table and you place the stack on top of the
participant‖s card. When you go back to the stack of cards, you essentially
under the cover of putting your hand over the top of the stack to apply the
prayer peek under the cover of your hand that is going onto the top of the
stack flip over the card on the bottom of the stack (the participants card) so
it is face up.
Then after you have flipped the card, don‖t keep your hands on the top of the
stack move your hands off of the stack again and address the participant.
The reason for not applying the prayer peek after the flip is that you would
need your hands over the cards for an extended period of time, it‖s better to
break the peeking process down into two stages and seemingly only have your
hands over the card for just a few seconds.
Let the participant write his thought and let him place it in the middle of
the stack. Now you will casually "casually bring it to the bottom of the stack
(using your favourite method)
Now your actions and script will cover your secret peek. If you are following
the actions, the card with the written information is on the bottom. Now take
one blank card from the top and say:
“Make your mind completely blank (showing the card) and just imagine and
believe that your thoughts will become mine”
As you do all these, just place the card on bottom, so it will cover the bottom
card.
In that way you will have the blank card as the bottom card and the next card
will be the card that you need to peek. Take your time, don‖t rush the peek and
whenever you see it proper, just move the blank card slightly, so the “written
card” can be visible for a moment.
After that you just need to take your single blank card, do a cut/pass and
leave the participant´s card in the middle.
An additional tip for this - While you have the blank card at the bottom, you
can grab your card and the participant´s card for a moment. In that way you
can flash the “second card from the bottom” (actually the third from the
bottom), in that way you can indirectly prove that the participant´s card isn‖t
near your eyes.
Bullet peek – Morgan Strebler
I've played with many peeks over the years. I think with any peek there needs
to be a justification to write information down. I've seen many performers ask
people to write down there best friends name, birth date, or star sign, This is
all information that the participant would never forget. Framing, here is
important how many people have forgotten a playing card minutes after
selection? I like to have them think of two random things such as an animal
and then to give the animal a crazy name. Now you have a justification to
have them write it down so they don't forget the information.
The peek that I'm going to teach you has severed me well over the years. It's a
full peek with no boxes drawn on the card.
You fold the card in half with the side facing you about a quarter of an inch
lower than the top of the card.
At this point you have the peek and it‖s so clean and calculated it ALWAYS
goes over their head.
By folding the card the way you did it gives you a smooth fluid motion to
open and shut the card and get the peek. You left thumb is on the outer right
corner
You right thumb is on the inside corner of the card next to the left thumb.
Now in one movement pull down with the right thumb simultaneously pushing up
with the left thumb sandwiching the completely unfolded card between the
palms of your hand.
The point when you get the peak is so bold they never see it coming. I have
the card between my two palms and I say "I want you to sandwich it between
you hand so there is no way can peek at it" Its at that moment that I open
my hands and get a clean FULL peak.
At that point come up with your right palm shutting the card in half while
using the left thumb to finish folding it. This VERY quick and natural in
movement in motion. The audience member then follows your instructions, and
you reveal the information.
This is the only peek that I've used in 20 years. I hope you get the mileage
out of it that I have
Enjoy!
The Block Peek – Dee Christopher
For more information on this peek, check out Dee‖s incredible penguin lecture
here - penguinmagic.com/p/6131
Introduction
Let me introduce you to one of my recently favoured techniques for gaining
information; I use several different techniques in close up performances. This
gimmick in particular can be brought into play with your block of blank
cards, straight from your pocket, or left behind if you wish to use another
technique before or after you use this one.
The block peek combines a simple gimmick and a direct technique to discover
hidden information, written on a business card, or a blank card. All you need
to put this together is a stack of blank (or business) cards, a couple of rubber
bands and either some double-sided tape, or some glue. This gimmick will take
you approximately one minute to construct and will last you many
performances; not that replacing
it is a difficult or expensive thing to do. The peeks are very easy to do, but
this method does offer the option of peeking several pieces of information
once you become a little more dexterous with it.
I carry a stack of blank cards around in my inside jacket pocket, secured with
a rubber band as my business cards are double sided. I chose aesthetics over
application when working on my business cards, but if you have a space on
your business cards in which a participant can write a thought, youʼll just
have to make a gimmick from your business card, not unlike the gimmick I
present in the explanation. The only thing you need to remember is that the
visible band needs to be on the side your participant usually writes on.
While that sentence is complete gibberish to you right now, it will all make
sense once youʼve obtained the full method. If you have laminated or thicker
stock business cards, you gimmick will rarely need to be replaced, but Iʼd
recommend keeping some extra rubber bands and tape in your gig bag, just to be
safe.
The Gimmick
The gimmick is extremely simple to construct; the devil, as always, is in this
simplicity. Itʼs logical, justified and nothing is out of place. The gimmick Itʼs
self is based off a card magic concept that I discovered several years ago,but
never had a use for. A close friend of mine released an ebook using this
method to create an illusion in which a selected card visually penetrates a
strip of duct tape thatʼs been wrapped around the box from the start. While the
ebook describing this close up effect is no longer available and remains
underground once more, some other beautiful pieces by the author are available
here:
http://danielmadison.co.uk/Anthology.html
Basic card magic knowledge will be required for the handling of this gimmick,
but all will be explained. If you are more talented in card technique, youʼll
probably be able to design some of your own handlings for this, I will detail
some alternate ideas involving more complicated moves later on.
The Block Peek gimmick comprises of one rubber band and two blank cards.
There is also
some double-sided tape involved. The rubber band is wrapped length ways
around one of the cards, this will cause the card to bevel. As we need it to
remain flat, another card (or two cards if necessary) is taped or glued to one
side of the card, sandwiching the rubber band in between. This is your
gimmick. If you hold your gimmick in a standard ʻdealerʼs gripʼ position,
(photos are on the next page) with the rubber band side up, you will notice
that it looks like the band is wrapped around the cards. By holding your
gimmick with the reverse side up, it looks like there is no band at all. The
only discrepancy is when you look at the short side of the card head on, you
can see a small bit of the band going in between the two cards. This is
remedied by holding your first finger on top of that discrepancy. It wonʼt be
noticeable when the gimmick is added to a stack of blank cards, but working in
situations where angles are constantly changing (i.e. nightclubs or mix and
mingle corporate events) has taught me to cover every possible angle and
discrepancy, where possible. Have a look at the following images to solidify
the information youʼve just read.
The dealer‖s grip
The Handling
The basic handling is very easy to do; I will first explain the mechanics,
then I will discuss the logic and justifications, as well as the benefits of
using this gimmick over just a regular stack of cards. I wonʼt discuss my
routines with this gimmick in this manuscript, as this is what I use for casual
performances, meaning that I donʼt have specific routines written and scripts
in place.
You will begin by placing your gimmick on the bottom of your stack of black
cards. The rubber band side will be facing up, so that the band contacts the
card above it; this means that whichever way the gimmick is orientated, a
blank side is visible. Wrap a normal rubber band around the whole stack,
including the gimmick, lengthways. This ensures that when you take the stack
out of your pocket, the audience is forced to understand that this is the
normal state for a stack of cards to be in when in your position. Some people
will choose to wrap a rubber band twice around the width of a stack of cards,
ala ʻOut To Lunchʼ whereas you prefer to wrap your cards lengthways. I
initially made the gimmick by wrapping the band twice across the width, but it
wasnʼt long before the pressure caused the band to rip through the card itʼs
mounted on, thus destroying the deception.
You will hold the deck in ʻdealerʼs gripʼ and remove the rubber band, placing
it on the table, or back in your pocket. You remove the top card (Iʼll explain
why as I discuss the subtleties and logic later) and hand it to the participant.
Now remove your pen and hand that to them as you explain what you would like
them to write – If theyʼre thinking of an image, have them draw it, if theyʼre
thinking of a name, they will write it on the card to commit to their thought
so that there is evidence to come back to later.
As they are writing their thought, you should perform a ʻhalf passʼ on the
gimmick. If you are not familiar with this technique, itʼs described in several
magic books, but I favour Aaron
Fisherʼs ʻGravity Half Passʼ from his book ʻThe Paper Engine.ʼ
Follow the pictures to get used to that motion. Itʼs very easy to do and
everyoneʼs attention is on the card being written on at this point, so you need
not worry about anyone catching the move. The reason this move is employed is
simply to expose the rubber band portion of the gimmick. You should still use
your finger to cover, the gimmickʼs rubber band is sat against your palm with
the packet still in dealerʼs grip at this point.
Following this move, simply wait for the participant to finish their writing
or drawing and take back the pen. You donʼt want to see the thought, so ask
them to hold it face down. You will then lift all the other cards off the
gimmick and ask them to place their card there, right back in the middle of
the stack. We are aware that this is, of course, not the middle of the stack;
your participant will not question this as itʼs standard practice and perfectly
logical as a motion.
The card with the thought written upon it is now sat at the bottom of the
stack of normal cards, directly above the gimmick. You will now take the
normal rubber band from where ever you stashed it previously and you will
apparently wrap it around the whole stack.
In reality, you will wrap the band around the entire block of normal cards,
including the card with the thought upon it, but excluding the gimmick. To
ensure this action is as smooth as possible, just riffle the back of the stack
of cards to allow the gimmick to ʻpopʼ off the stack, and place your little
finger in the gap causing a break. You just need to slide the rubber band into
this gap, rather than around the whole stack. Be sure to wrap the band just
once and lengthways, so that it matches the visual your gimmick presents
perfectly. Now, thanks to the gimmick, as long as your finger and thumb cover
either short side of the stack where the break between the two rubber bands is,
you can show the stack from all angles and it looks perfectly normal.
Iʼve named this ʻThe Fall Peekʼ because of the action, the gimmick falls away
from the stack as you rotate the whole block to show either side. This peek is
done directly after the band is wrapped around the stack – Itʼs almost part of
the same motion. It is in fact not so dissimilar to ʻthe drop conceptʼ which has
also been explored by Madison.
Wrap the band around the stack of normal cards, above the gimmick, as
discussed before. Ensure that the band is in the correct position so that it
matches the gimmick in its position on the stack.
Now, you must grip the whole packet from above in a ʻbiddle gripʼ, which is
simply the same grip I mention on the picture page discussing the half pass.
Grip the packet with the fingertips of the right hand (reverse if you are more
comfortable dealing cards left handed) and lift the packet up, rotating your
wrist to show the audience the band of your gimmick. You should of course
ensure that the fingers cover the gap in the band. The action will look as if
youʼre just showing the packet from either side to demonstrate its opacity as
completely solid and not transparent in any way. This is a very casual move, I
simply say;
“Now the stack is secured and you cannot see through it from any angle.”
Once youʼve shown the audience the band of the gimmick, you will reverse the
action, but continue rotating to show the rubber band thatʼs wrapped around the
stack from the top.
As you rotate, you will allow the gimmick to fall into your waiting left palm,
which holds it in a gamblerʼs cop style grip.
The peek is made at this point, and then you simply place the stack back on top
of the gimmick and you can begin your reading. The pictures on the next
couple of pages will demonstrate the action from the front, and in an ʻover
the shoulderʼ style view.
(Spectatorʼs View)
(Performerʼs View)
The Clip Peek
This is a peek that I never really use, but it is useful to know in case you
need your left hand for something at the time you wish to peek. Itʼs more
angle-sensitive than ʻthe fall peekʼ so should only be performed one-on-one.
Iʼm including it here for completeness. The motion for this is essentially an
application of the ʻCardini changeʼ in card magic, but from the other axis. You
will grip the stack in the ʻbiddle gripʼ once more and the action will appear
the same, but without the left hand. As you rotate the packet from parallel
with the floor to perpendicular, at the same point you would do the peek
normally, you will increase pressure with your pinky on the top right corner
of the rubber band side of the gimmick. As you rotate the packet perpendicular
to the floor, you will allow the pinky to slide/peel the gimmick from the
stack, clipping it in place. This is a slightly knacky motion to get the hang
of, but Iʼm sure the slight of hand lovers will enjoy practicing it.
Multiple Peeks
I mentioned earlier the idea of peeking multiple pieces of information from
the stack. Again, referencing card magic as there can be a lot of cross over
between working with decks of cards and stacks of blank/business cards, I
started with playing around with using the gimmick as a cover card for
ʻClipshiftʼ variations. By all means, test out that theory, the texture of
untreated blank cards makes this difficult to do, but itʼs definitely possible
as long as you have shade and you set up the stack in the way I discuss in the
following paragraphs. If you would like to look into the ʻClipshiftʼ, you can
find out more information at
http://www.DanAndDave.com
Setting up the cards for multiple peeks is much the same as for ʻthe fall peekʼ
in that you will wrap the band around the stack, excluding the gimmick. The
difference here is that you will also exclude the cards with thoughts written
on them.
You will hand one card to each of two participants. They will write whatever
thought you have asked them to and you will break the stack and have them
replaced, one after another in the middle of the block. You should start with
the rightmost participant during this replacement process. (Iʼll explain why in
a moment.) Of course, these cards will go directly above the gimmick as before.
Now, before picking up the rubber band to wrap the stack; you will riffle the
back of the cards, but rather than just letting the gimmick ʻpopʼ off the stack
to get your break, you will ʻpopʼ the gimmick plus the two cards with thoughts
written on them so that you can wrap only the normal, blank cards. The cards
with thoughts on them are loose, just like the gimmick is, however, this will
be invisible to the audience as long as your finger and thumb cover the break
in the band as discussed before.
To peek the multiple pieces of information, you should do the standard ʻfall
peekʼ but you will view the first piece of information and direct your
scripted sentence to the person that is stood rightmost out of the two (or more)
people that wrote thoughts. You will ask them to verify that they cannot see
through the card, before turning to the left and asking the next person that
wrote a thought if they can see through the card, or verify that itʼs solid. As
you turn, you will repeat ʻthe fall peekʼ motion, dropping the first card with
the information on it on to the gimmick to reveal the second card. This can be
repeated as many times as necessary, but I wouldnʼt recommend doing the whole
room in one go as it will become a little suspicious; two or three is fine.
The beauty here is that you can do this to each person that wrote a thought,
and each time you are peeking the personʼs thought that you are directing your
question to. This allows you to easily anchor the image or word to that person,
so that you donʼt get muddled up during the reading. Rather than having to
reveal all the thoughts at once, you can show your skill of understanding
which thought is coming from who, or read their minds one by one. This is a
vast advantage that allows you to look much more credible.
Removing The Band
There is one important thing that I havenʼt touched upon yet; how to show the
original card the spectator wrote upon and how to reset. This is very easy and
only uses motions that youʼve already learnt. You will pinch the normal rubber
band with your right fingertips from the top of the stack and drag it to the
right, thus pulling it off the block. Place the band back on the table and if
youʼve written a reveal, draw attention to that, if youʼve already said your
reveal in your wording, you can make eye contact with someone, drawing the
attention away from the stack so that you can perform another ʻhalf passʼ so
that the gimmickʼs band is now touching the ink on the thought-card. You can
then say something along the lines of; “You wrote a thought down on one of
these cards as a commitment at the start of this process.” As you say “one of
these cards” you should push off a few cards with your left thumb into your
right hand demonstrating your words. Replace these cards on the bottom, instead
of the top of the block, directly below the gimmick.
Now you will turn the whole stack over in your hands and thumb through the
cards until you reach the one with ink upon it. It is directly below your
gimmick, but your gimmick just appears to be another normal card. Remove the
thought-card and cut your gimmick to the bottom. Youʼre now ready to go again.
Both of these can be bought from your favourite magic dealer and are
wonderful solutions with similar methods, but different aesthetics. This is the
closest to perfect solution that Iʼve found for doing this with a rubber band
wrapped stack. Other notable methods that Iʼve come across include ʻThe PAC
Stackʼ by Paul Carnazzo, which is an amazing solution for drawing
duplications, but it takes a lot more arts and crafts and something a little
extra that makes writing a little difficult to read, especially if itʼs messy
handwriting thatʼs difficult to read as it is! You can find Paulʼs work here:
http://www.MentalVoyage.com
When you wrap a stack of cards in a rubber band, they feel like a unit and
itʼs casually suggested that there is no way to access the thought without
unwrapping the stack. Itʼs a very powerful suggestion that isnʼt in place when
the cards are loose; especially if the audience knows that you are dexterous
with playing cards. This is the reason I always just hand the first card on
the pile to a participant, I never mix the blank card, refer to them as a deck
or a pack and I use untreated cards, so they donʼt flow and spread beautifully
like playing cards do.
Now, itʼs time for you to put together your own ʻBlock Peekʼ gimmick and start
practicing the motions. Itʼs a lovely thing to use and Iʼm sure youʼll have
much success with it!
To find out more about Dee Christopherʼs other publications; visit the
following websites:
http://www.DeeChristopher.com
http://www.angelsXdevils.com
To justify or not justify? - That is the question!
This is one question I cannot answer for YOU. Each one of us has our own way
to do things. I can however list a series of different options for you to take
into account when using billets in any routine.
If you are using a billet in the middle of a routine and the billet
contextually fits in the context/ premise of the routine a justification will
only draw attention to the billet.
If you hand someone a billet at the start of a routine and ask them to write
something down (without the premise of the routine surrounding the billet I.E.
Sneak Thief) I feel there should be a logical reason for the billet- A
justification for why they are writing something and place the focus on the
surrounding factors of the billet (as outlined in the first part of this
document.)
If the billet is wrote on at the back end of a routine (this is a rarity) 90%
of the presentation has already existed and therefore there really is no need
to have anything justified as the billet is merely acting as a tool to show a
match.
First let‖s take a look at where a billet naturally fits into the context of a
routine and therefore needs no justification.
If you are utilising a billet at the very start of a routine and the focal
point during the routine is geared around the billet (or billets) then trying
to justify the billet brings the wrong attention to it.
A great example of this is ―Sneak thief‖, the billets are on display throughout
the entire routine and therefore there is no need to try and create a
justification for the billets being in play as the routine is self-explanatory.
One routine I really like is Seven Keys to the baldpate, I remember reading
this effect and loving the concept. One thing I didn‖t like was having to
carry the lock and keys, here is my take on that concept – This is outlined to
give you an idea of ways to use billets in which they don‖t need a
justification.
Seven Keys to the Baldpate (modernized)
Effect
The performer sits with a participant (we will call her Mary).
After becoming acquainted, the performer asks Mary to remove her mobile phone.
He takes the mobile from Mary and realises it has a password locking it.
The performer looks at Mary and asks if she would be happy for him to try
divining the code. Of course, she doesn‖t mind.
The performer removes five of his business cards and asks Mary to write her
phone code upon one, to write four fake codes on the remaining cards and to
mix them up until even she doesn‖t know where her actual code is.
The performer closes his eyes (he could even be blindfolded). He asks Mary to
lift up the cards to his forehead one at a time, with the numbers facing her,
and to lightly hold the card a couple of centimetres from your forehead
(never making contact).
The performer‖s eyes are closed the entire time during this process.
The performer says No to the first card and asks Mary to place the card to
one side, discarding it; the next is also a No that is also placed to one side.
On the next card the performer is a little hesitant, claiming a “maybe,” and
the card is placed face down onto the table in front of the performer. The
next is a No, the next a Maybe (which is placed face down in front of the
performer) and the final card a No.
The performer now opens his eyes. He tells Mary he is about to flip the cards,
but she is not to give anything away. The cards are flipped and the performer
holds his hands over each of the cards for a few seconds, finally picking up
Mary‖s phone and unlocking it!
The cards can be left with the participant and examined completely!
Breakdown
This effect is best suited as an opener to a routine that is going to use the
participant‖s mobile telephone (like Isabella‖s Star 2–Shameless plug!). That way
there is a beautiful following point from this effect as it segues seamlessly
straight into another effect.
Firstly, you will have realised that I reduced the number from seven to five.
This was purely to keep the presentation entertaining. Now you must be
thinking:
“How can you locate the card if it has no markings?”
The honest truth is that the cards are marked, just not visually!
To mark the card, simply take a business card and spray it with a perfume or
aftershave spray. Just lightly spray the card and then let it dry out.
That‖s right; the cards are marked via the smell!! Therefore, you will know
exactly which card it is even with your eyes closed.
Whenever the prepared card is run past your nose, as long as you are
breathing through your nose when the card is brought up to your forehead, you
will be able to smell the perfume.
The method couldn‖t be simpler. Since you are going to be asking the
participant to place the cards up to your forehead, you will know exactly when
to breathe. This technique is ultra-reliable.
'Prepared' the Ace of Hearts. I used a classic force on Myke (which I know he
spotted). I asked him to mix up the cards and asked him to quickly go through
the entire deck (placing each card to my forehead).
I got down to two, and without even turning over the cards, I located the Ace
of Hearts (I am sure he didn‖t know how that was done!).
Full Performance
(I am going to assume that you are already acquainted with the participant.)
Performer: “I want you to think about this for a few seconds. If you could
read minds, what would you want to read from someone‖s mind?”
Performer: “Everything you are thinking of right now I have probably tried
at some point. I certainly do know when someone is lying to me.”
(The last statement is said off the cuff. Women that are in relationships most
of the time think: “I wish I could know when my partner is lying.” Never make
a huge point when using the throwaway line; let them decide if you really did
read that that is what they were thinking. A lot of the time they will vocally
let you know that that is what they were thinking. Say the line enough so
that even if they weren‖t thinking that, the line will never seem out of
place.)
Performer: “Have you got a mobile phone that I could borrow for a couple of
moments?”
The participant pulls the phone out of her pocket and one of two things is
going to happen:
If she hands it to you straight away, then proceed into this routine. If, on
the other hand, you notice that she is going to unlock it, stop her.
Performer: “Has it got a lock on it? That‖s not a problem. Do you mind if I try
to divine the code?”
It really is daunting when you think about it. Sorry, another tangent down.)
Hold out your hand for the phone. Even if the participant had any
reservations about handing it to you, you are already halfway there, so it
psychologically seems easier for her to hand you it.
Place it to your left. Ensure you know where it is, because the last thing you
want to do is knock it off of the table when you close your eyes.
Remove a stack of business cards from your pocket (the prepared card is on the
face of the stack is therefore the one they will write on first).
Performer: “I want you to write down your actual phone code on that piece of
card, whilst I look away. When you are done, place it face down onto the
table.”
(Make sure you say the word “actual.” It prevents them from writing down a
fake code. I have had this happen before, and when it comes to the revelation,
it is not pretty. Changing one word can make such a difference in the way the
participant acts.)
Performer: “Now I want you to write a fake four-digit code onto each of the
other cards.”
Again give them a few seconds to do this, and turn around when they have done
it. This process, on paper, may seem lengthy, but in performance, trust me, it
is over very quickly.
Performer: “Pick up the cards up and mix them until you are satisfied that
even you don‖t know the order of the cards.”
(This is where things get really easy. Obviously all you have to do is ask the
participant to place the card in front of your forehead and start to breathe
in slowly through your nose. You want to make sure that when the card with
the smell comes up to your forehead, you act hesitantly and point with your
right hand where to place it in front of you. This is essential. Because you
have your eyes closed, you need to know exactly where the card is being
placed. The second card should be placed to your left, so direct the participant
with the left hand.
If you haven‖t noticed the smell by the fourth card, place the fourth card to
your left and the fifth card to your right.)
Open your eyes. Obviously you know where the card is, so the rest of this is
about taking your time and really making it seem like you are divining the
card.
Address Mary:
Performer: “Mary, I am going to flip over these cards. It is essential that you
don‖t give anything away at this point.”
Flip over the cards and start to hold your hands over both the cards in turn,
and then pick up the mobile telephone and hold it toward yourself. The last
thing you want at this point is Mary seeing the first number you type in,
because she will react prematurely and that‖s it, effect over. You want her to
react to the moment the phone opens.
Credits
George M. Cohan - Seven Keys to Baldpate (1913)
You can see reading this routine that the billet is naturally part of the
routine and therefore it is the focal point of the audience‖s attention. There
are a few reasons why the method is so well hidden, one is that there are
several billets and therefore the one with specific and relevant information
gets hidden amongst the rest making it seem hidden (even though it is in plain
sight).
Another thing is that the billets have been painted red – The attention has
totally been drawn to the billets, making the audience feel like there is
nothing to hide as you've shown them everything there is to see. (Note the
billets are not physically painted red, it's an expression for drawing
attention to something and I'm not sure the expression exists outside the U.K.)
I have never really sat and thought about this sort of thing, it is something
that I have sort of done subconsciously - justification is something that is
totally situation dependant (for me) which sort of counters (somewhat) what I
said earlier.
If it needs a justification I‖ve just sort of done it and known when I need to
do it. Take your time to look at your routines, when creating a billet routine
does the billet need a justification? If it stands out as not being normal to
the situation I would recommend it.
Performer: "Right now I'm not really picking anything up from you as a
person, we have only just met and therefore the connection our minds share is
just foundational at best.
With your permission I would like to try and deepen that connection, thoughts
are very private things and I don't want to impose without your permission".
[Notice one thing here, I asked for permission. This is something so tiny but it
is implicit that I am going to be climbing into their mind. I have never see
anyone ask this question a thought is a very, very private thing. All the
things that your friends/ family tell you in confidence are stored there.
Every secret you have ever kept is stored there. I think sometimes it is such a
beautiful thing to ask someone if you can climb inside their mind.
This is also a great little subtlety because the audience‖s focal point is aimed
on this and not the billet. The billet should be the least important part of
the routine (in terms of audience attention).
Performer: “I can tell from the off that you are the sort of person that is
the go to person in times of a crises. I also know you are the sort of person
that is good natured, so good natured that you would never want anyone to look
stupid in any situation. I know that your friends know that also, therefore
even if I guessed what you were thinking of, the likeliness is that your
friends will think you were just agreeing with me to make me not look stupid.
I want you to take this, write (whatever you want them to write) this will act
as a tool of confirmation later on IF I manage to pick up on your thoughts”.
Look at the simple yet elegant nature of this, you in the nicest sense started
to read the participant before you introduced the billet and the only reason
you are introducing the billet is because it is merely to act to confirm what
you are saying to the participant‖s friends. Not to the participant because the
participant is going to know if you got it right or not.
You would use a different script to the one outlined above, this is to be used
when you have someone who is butting heads with you and the response you
know they are going to give when you introduce the billet is one of refusing
to use the billet and or questioning your motives for using the billet.
Performer: “One thing I think we all know for sure is that no matter how
many thoughts I guess of yours you will come up with the most convoluted
explanations as to how I arrived at them thoughts. That‖s not a bad thing I
feel with you, you are the sort of person that questions everything and wants
an explanation why.
I also feel that because of your thought process even if I guessed what it is
you were thinking of the likeliness is you wouldn‖t admit to it. So I am going
to give you this, I want you to take it and write (whatever you want them to
write) upon it.
This just means that A) you cannot change your mind at any point and B) That
will act as insurance IF I get your thought”.
- Again simple but elegant.
The aim is to work with participants not to rub up the wrong way and create
bad rapport. This is to be used very sparingly when you do get the occasional
idiot that refuses to quit.
Another little subtlety is making a guess about what the participant has wrote
before ever implementing a peek, just so it feels to the participant like you
don‖t need to handle the billet as you have already started to pick up on their
thoughts.
This is where you will start to guess before they make the drawing/ write the
word. I mentioned above that this type of routine is one that is not utilised
very often and the billet is not implemented until the last moment of
performance.
Performer: “I feel with you that you changed your mind between a couple of
drawings before settling on the one that you are thinking of now, right?”
This will hit a lot of the time as people tend to think before they act, it
really doesn‖t matter if the participant says “no I haven‖t” - it just makes
your job slightly harder as you don‖t have the second/ third drawing to wash
away the misses in a moment but guessing is still very possible.
Like I said most of the time people will admit to the fact that they did
change their mind a few times. The probability of them doing this can be
heightened by simply implementing this line before asking them to think of a
drawing,
Performer: “Feel free to change your mind a few times, you don‖t have to if
you don‖t want but I want to ensure the thing you are thinking of is entirely
a free choice”.
This will make them think a little bit about the choice they are going to make.
I would usually then start to prod at what it is they are thinking of, whilst
trying my best to make out as though I genuinely am picking up on the
participant‖s thoughts.
Performer: “Ok the thing I am feeling at the moment is that you went for
something that is fairly abstract instead on intricate and detailed, to me it
feels like this thing is something that is composed of a few simple shapes. If
this is not the image you are thinking of right now, it might have been one
of the ones you are still focusing on that you changed your mind from. I am
correct so far right?”
The participant will likely be inclined to say yes that you have picked up on
specific elements; this is where you can add another line.
Performer: “The drawing you are thinking of is not something that would be
found outside is it?”
Performer: “Take this and draw the drawing you are thinking of so it is at
the forefront of your mind as other thoughts are getting in the way. I need
to make sure that one thought is singled out from every other thought”.
After the participant has made the drawing you will get your peek, don‖t
reveal the information straight from here. You need to implement some of the
procedure first outlined in this document.
During this type of routine you can always hand someone else at the table the
billet and apply your peek here, the justification for showing someone else
the billet it is so that two minds are thinking of the information heightening
the probability of you being able to make an educated deductions.
If you really wanted you could after getting the information use a one ahead
in order to be able to get one of the drawings that the participant changed
their mind from meaning you are opening up two hits for the price of one.
A few simple sentences that are implicit towards the fact that you can read
the participant without the need for the billet is all it takes to convince
them of your abilities and the heat completely goes from the billet. This sort
of thinking transcends into many other areas of mentalism.
Let your props/ tools/ principles work for you not the other way around… In
other words, don‖t put the entire emphasis on those things; put the emphasis on
you and your participant.
I really think time should be taken to find out WHEN a billet should be used.
It should be used in conjunction with prop-less material. I don‖t think the two
could or should exist without the other.
If you consistently use billet peeks for everything you do it is only going to
be a matter of time before a participant or your audience wonder why you
always have to resort to having them write something down.
There is an interesting story that presses this point but I will save that for
another time.
I don‖t want to spend too much time on this point and the opinions I am
expressing are purely my own, remember there is no harm in experimenting.
Using plain blank card stock in close up performance, in stage this is fine as
you can be a lot more lenient with props (I don‖t know whether billets should
be classed as props or not, or who decides this stuff but I‖m sure you
understand me). In close up scenarios I think taking a totally blank card out
of your pocket or your wallet screams irregularity.
Go around collecting company business cards from companies that people will
recognise or if there is a particular gsm/ finish you like to use from a
company that provide your billets have businesses printed onto the front of
the card stock leaving the reverse side blank.
I have over the years collected enough to last me some time, Vista print will
send you a few hundred cards for nothing but the postage price! Keep the
design on the face simple, taxi/ private hire companies are great as they are
cards you would naturally keep inside your wallet and no one would ever
suspect a thing.
If you are in the U.K these bad boys are things of beauty –
The trusty train ticket, innocent and instantly recognised wherever you go in
the U.K. This will sit in your wallet and no one would bat an eyelid if you
asked something to write on the back of this train ticket.
That is not why they are so beautiful though, the reason these are so amazing
is because of the back of the ticket…
Isn‖t that a thing of beauty?
I probably obsess over things I shouldn‖t but anybody who performs the Acidus
Novus or Busch‖s Billet will look at this and realise just why it is so
amazing!
For those who don‖t instantly realise a lot of the time you need to restrict
the participant to a specific part of a billet in order to facilitate the peek,
this train ticket does that without having to add any extra work or scripting
to the routine.
It is truly simple and elegant, ask friends and family to save these tickets
for you when they return from a journey and soon you will have a good
number for free.
If you are outside of England, this is the exact type of thing you are looking
for, as it is something to aid you in utilising billets that seems natural. I
personally never use 3x5 index cards as they are something that are so out of
place over here that they don‖t even fit naturally into everyday life and
trying to peek with them is for me like trying to play basketball with a
medicine ball…Just not happening.
If you want to use your own business cards in performance, think about the
back design, how does it coincide with the peek that you going to use?
If you are restricting the participant to the bottom of the card (in the peek
you are using) have a quote printed on the top half, there is nothing better
than a restriction that is natural like this.
There are pros and cons to leaving the participant with your business card –
It‖s a great thing to aid in promoting your business but a bad thing if you
are trying to get them to forget you had them write something down.
Anyway this brings us to the end of this month‖s document, it is 5.33am I have
not slept for the last few days and I am now realising I have a cold coming
on… What luck!
I want to thank you guys for taking the time out to read this document and I
really hope you get a lot of it. Thank you for following and being a part of
my story.
Key techniques involve wrapping the deck in a specific manner and performing moves like 'half pass' and 'the fall peek'. Using a rubber band around the normal cards but excluding the gimmick allows the performer to create a break for peeking. Maintaining a 'dealer’s grip' or 'biddle grip' to handle the stack and smoothly executing these covert yet casual actions enable the performer to glimpse at the concealed information without suspicion .
Setup and preparation are pivotal in multiple peek routines as they determine the ease and discreteness of information gathering within a performance. By pre-arranging cards and rubber bands to exclude gimmicks and align the visual appearance, the performer ensures that peeks remain undetected. Carefully breaking the card stack and strategically placing each billet or thought card, with attention to positioning and motion, allows smooth implementation of multiple peeks without raising suspicion. This meticulous groundwork enables flawless execution and seamless integration into the routine .
A gimmick is employed to facilitate covert peeking of information without raising suspicion, allowing the performer to gather secret knowledge while maintaining the appearance of authenticity. Gimmicks such as modified card stacks provide a structured approach that prevents detection while enabling performers to reveal intimate details as if through intuition. The gimmick, by matching the card stack's visual continuity and providing an undetectable method to access written thoughts, aids the performer in creating a seamless illusion of mind reading .
The mentalist script is crafted to preemptively address skepticism and guide participants towards believing in the performer's abilities. Scripts emphasize the control and foreknowledge of the participant's thoughts, often before the use of a billet. By making predictive statements about the participant’s internal decision-making processes, such as suggesting they changed their mind about drawings, the performer ensures engagement and plausibility. In skeptical scenarios, a different script is used to assert confidence and neutrality, portraying the billet as a mere confirmation tool rather than a necessity for the mental feat .
Incorporating props like billets in mentalism is balanced with prop-less techniques by using it only when necessary and when it complements the performer's skills, creating a convincing narrative. An over-reliance on such props diminishes the impact, as the audience may attribute the mentalist's success to those props. Instead, props should aid the performance without overshadowing the performer's apparent intuitive skills, ensuring that the prop enhances rather than defines the performance .
To manage resistant participants, a mentalist can adapt their approach by shifting the focus from predictive to observational, using scripts that acknowledge skepticism while reinforcing the role of the billet as a neutral confirmation tool. The performer can also rely on creating rapport, using engaging dialogue to invite cooperation, and subtly managing expectations by framing the experience as collaborative rather than confrontational. This helps in softening skepticism and ensuring the participant remains part of the act without undermining its credibility .
The performer can extract additional information by interpreting the thoughts surrounding what the participant has written on the billet. By guiding the participant to choose a meaningful category (e.g., a place such as 'Spain'), the performer can make educated guesses about the nature of the participant's thoughts based on psychological cues. For instance, emphasizing feelings associated with the thought (such as warmth suggesting it’s not a number) or interpreting the inability to 'touch' the thought as suggesting a place or a person no longer with us, allows the performer to reveal more about the participant's thoughts without direct revelation .
The 'fall peek' method ensures a smooth reveal by allowing the gimmick to fall discretely into the performer's palm while rotating the card stack, aligning with the preceding motion of showing transparency to the audience. This subtlety maintains the illusion of normalcy, as it happens in a casual, continuous movement. By covering exposed elements efficiently, this method supports a seamless transition from peeking to presentation, thus enhancing the fluidity and effect of the performance .
The proper timing and context for introducing a billet are crucial for maintaining the illusion of mind reading. It should appear a logical part of the routine rather than an obvious prop for obtaining information. The billet is introduced after the performer has already made some guesses or observations about the participant's thoughts, which diminishes the billet's perceived importance and shifts focus off the prop and onto the performer's 'abilities'. This strategic timing keeps the routine seamless and enhances credibility .
The mentalist's personal presentation and demeanor are crucial for establishing credibility and convincing audiences of their 'supernatural' abilities. By exuding confidence, maintaining a composed posture, and displaying a keen interest in participant responses, the mentalist builds rapport and trust. The illusion relies heavily on the performer's ability to carry themselves as a figure of authority and intrigue. A resonate voice, deliberate pacing in speech, and attentive gestures contribute to an atmosphere where rational disbelief is momentarily suspended, thus enhancing the efficacy of the mentalism act .