0% found this document useful (0 votes)
644 views3 pages

Department of Education: Region I Schools Division Office of Pangasinan Ii Sison District

The document summarizes a research proposal submitted by Florence B. Cabuag in response to a call for division research proposals. The proposal is titled "School Leaders’ Strategies in Maximizing Stakeholders’ Social Support System in LDM Management in the New Normal: Basis for Leadership Guide". It was reviewed using an action research evaluation tool and was recommended for approval by the School District Research Committee. The evaluation found that the proposal adequately addressed criteria such as having a clear research topic and questions, proposed intervention strategies aligned with modular distance learning, and plans for implementation, data collection and analysis, dissemination and utilization of results.

Uploaded by

Stephanie Payumo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
644 views3 pages

Department of Education: Region I Schools Division Office of Pangasinan Ii Sison District

The document summarizes a research proposal submitted by Florence B. Cabuag in response to a call for division research proposals. The proposal is titled "School Leaders’ Strategies in Maximizing Stakeholders’ Social Support System in LDM Management in the New Normal: Basis for Leadership Guide". It was reviewed using an action research evaluation tool and was recommended for approval by the School District Research Committee. The evaluation found that the proposal adequately addressed criteria such as having a clear research topic and questions, proposed intervention strategies aligned with modular distance learning, and plans for implementation, data collection and analysis, dissemination and utilization of results.

Uploaded by

Stephanie Payumo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Introduction Letter and Research Proposal Information
  • Action Research Evaluation Tool

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION I
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF PANGASINAN II
SISON DISTRICT
Sison, Pangasinan

January 14, 2020

DANILO C. SISON,PhD.
Schools Division Superintendent
Pangasinan Division II
Canarvacanan, Binalonan, Pangasinan

Sir:

In response to Division Memorandum No. 001 s 2021 re: Call for Division Research Proposals
SY 2020-2021, the undersigned respectfully endorsed the following research proposals.

Research Title Name of Proponent Position Title


SCHOOL LEADERS’ FLORENCE B. CABUAG OIC-ASST.
STRATEGIES IN MAXIMIZING PRINCIPAL II (SHS)
STAKEHOLDERS’ SOCIAL
SUPPORT SYSTEM IN LDM
MANAGEMENT IN THE NEW
NORMAL: BASIS FOR
LEADERSHIP GUIDE

Thank you very much.

VERY TRULY YOURS,

ELIZA O ROSINO,PhD.
PSDS
Name: FLORENCE B. CABUAG :
SchooL: AMAGBAGAN INTEGRATED SCHOOL
" Congressional District: FIFTH
Learning Area:

ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION TOOL

Criteria Yes No Remarks


1. Research Title
The title clearly states the topic of the study.
2. Rationale of the Studv
a. The research proposal presents a general description of
the topic
b. The proposal has a comprehensive discussion of school
situater.
c. The proposal discussed the main issue of the study.

d. The arguments presented are supported by relevant


data
3. Research Questions
a. Main and specific questions are present.
b. Main question reflects the research topic and is in
consonance with the research title.
c. Main question is written as a declarative sentence
d.The specific questions include the pre and post
assessments of the intervention

e. Specific questions are written as interrogative sentences


f. Specific questions are not answerable by yes or no.
4. Proposed Innovation Interventions and Strategy
a. An updated/new innovation. intervention or strategy is
presented.
b. The proposed innovation, intervention or strategy is
aligned to Modular Distance Learning
c. The proposed innovation. intervention or strategy is
supported by detailed discussion of the activities to be
done within the specified quarter.
d. The innovation, intervention or strategy will be
implemented for at least 12 weeks
5. Methodology
5.1. Participants
a. The number of participants is specified
b. The inclusion criteria for the selection of the participants
is discussed thoroughly
5.2. Data Gathering Methods
a. The main instrument/s to be used is/are specified
b. The mechanism to validate the instrument is present.
c. The instrument to be used in the study is attached as
annex
5.3.Data Analysis Plan
a. The statistical tools that shall be used to process and
analyze data per specific problem are indicated.
b. The tools are defined with their corresponding formula
5.4. Action Research Work Plan and Timelines
a. The timeline presented is within 6 months period
b . T h e activities to be conducted are clearly stated
5.5. Cost Estimate
a. The estimated cost to be incurred is specified
b. The items constituting the cost are identified
5.6. Plans for Dissemination and Utilization
a. There i s a detailed discussion on how to disseminate
the output of the study.
b. There is a detailed discussion on how to utilize the
output of the study.
5.7. References
a. APA style was used
b. The entries are alphabetically arranged
c. The 2nd line onwards of each entry were indented to the
right.

Recommendation of the School District Research Committee:

Checker:
WINNIE B. PANEDA, PhD.
Approved: Principal IV

ELIZA O. ROSINO, PhD.


Public School District Supervisor

You might also like