RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONCRETE CHIPPING AND REPAIR
PIC I 7007/7015
RISK ASSESSMENT
SECTION 1-GAC Date: January 15, 2021
Validity: Three year from the date of approval or till completion of the specified activity.
Facility / Job Location :
Department: Specify Activity to be assessed :- Assessment team member Signature
Mr. Aamir Khan (safety
1
Concrete chipping and repair of access officer)
Mechanical TR1 Lift station manhole. Mr. Charles Doria
2 (Safety Manager)
Engr. Mhd. Fangary (Project
3 Manager)
Table – b: Risk Bands / Risk Levels
Score Range (RPN) Risk Level
1–4 1 Low
5–9 2 Medium
10 – 19 3 High
20 – 25 4 Critical
Table – d: Environmental Impact Scale
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONCRETE CHIPPING AND REPAIR
PIC I 7007/7015
RISK ASSESSMENT
Table – a: Risk Heat Map Table Score Description Environment
Likelihood Risk Bands Environmental catastrophe
Critical 5 Severe Long-term environmental damage (require >5 years to recover)
5 Expected Medium (5) High (10) High (15) Critical (20)
(25) Revoke of EPO
Critical
4 Highly likely Low (4) Medium (8) High (12) High (16) · Significant environmental damage
(20)
3 Likely Low (3) Medium (6) Medium (9) High (12) High (15) · Medium-term environmental damage (require >1-5 years to recover)
4 Material · RCER Class III violations
Medium
2 Slight Low (2) Low (4) Medium (6) High (10)
(8) · Continuous environmental violations with frequent notifications
Medium from the regulator
1 Not likely Low (1) Low (2) Low (3) Low (4)
(5) · Marginal environmental damage without lasting effect
Minor Moderate Important 3 Material 4 Severe 5
1 2 3 Important · RCER Class II violations
Impact
· Limited scale violation - can be corrected in <24 hours
Table – c: Mitigation strategies of the Risk Level Table · Short-term environmental damage (require <1 year to recover)
Score Risk Level Typical Mitigation Strategies · RCER Class I violations
2 Moderate
Range · Frequent environmental violations (require >24 hours but <1 year to
1–4 Low (1) Accept and continually monitor the risk. correct)
· Negligible environmental damage - contained within the premises;
5–9 Reduce/transfer the risk to acceptable level based on some 1 Minor
RCER Class 0 violations
Medium (2) logical analysis (preferably cost-benefit analysis). Otherwise
accept and continually monitor the risk.
10 – 19 Reduce/transfer/avoid the risk to acceptable level – priority Table – f: Property Damage Impact Scale
High (3) action/decision required.
Score Description Financial – Site (SAR)
20 – 25 Reduce/transfer/avoid the risk to acceptable level – high 5 Severe >40 million
Critical (4)
priority or immediate action/decision required. 4 Material >4 million to 40 million
Table – e: OHS Impact Scale
Score Description Health & Safety
5 Severe · One or more fatality of employee, contractor staff or 3 Important >400,000 to 4 million
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONCRETE CHIPPING AND REPAIR
PIC I 7007/7015
RISK ASSESSMENT
public 2 Moderate >100,000 to 400,000
· Permanent total disability of one or more employees, 1 Minor 40,000 to 100,000
4 Material contractor staff or public Table- g: Likelihood of consequence
Score Description
· Lost time injury
5 Expected
3 Important · In-patient medical care required for employee,
4 Highly Likely
contractor staff or public
3 Likely
· Minor injury or illness with reversible health effect
2 Moderate 2 Less Likely
· Restricted work case 1 Remote
· Slight injury or health effect
1 Minor · Out-patient medical treatment to employee, contractor
staff or public
Calculation of Initial & Residual Risk:
The Initial and Residual risks shall be calculated as per the rating criteria detailed in tables d, e, f & g above to decide on at Risk Priority Number (RPN)
from the table b.
RPN is calculated as ‘RPN=Impact X Likelihood’.
Use table ‘a’, the 5x5 Risk Heat Map to identify the rate for the Impact and likelihood.
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONCRETE CHIPPING AND REPAIR
PIC I 7007/7015
RISK ASSESSMENT
Sr. # JOB STEPS POTENTIAL HAZARD SEVERITY / EXISTING CONTROL Initial Risk Additional Control Measures Residual risk
(What can cause CONSEQUENCES MEASURES (Risk (Risk Level)
harm?) (What can go wrong Level)
to who?)
01 Concrete • Slips, Trips, Falls & Minor to Signage and • All portable chipping
chipping of access Abrasions Serious/ fatal barricades are gun are regularly
manhole • Crushing & Pinching Injuries to installed. PPE are maintained to help
• Cutting, Stabbing workers and by available for minimize the risk of
& Puncturing standers. workers. exposures to these
Environmental: hazards.
• Noise • All portable power tool
Is it likely that the maintenance is
normal operation of documented.
this plant will produce • Engineering controls (or
excessive noise levels? physical changes) such
• Dust, Fumes & as mandatory machinery
Vapors guarding or any
Is it likely there will be protective safety screens
3 1
airborne dust & enclosures are in
particles, toxic fumes place in all workspaces
or volatile vapours & all in good working
produced & therefore condition.
be present in the
workspace? •
Vibration Is the
normal operation of
this plant likely to
create severe or
excess mechanical
vibration that could be
transferable to the
operator?
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONCRETE CHIPPING AND REPAIR
PIC I 7007/7015
RISK ASSESSMENT
02 Concrete repair • Crushing & Minor to • Gloves are given • Safe operating procedures
and concrete Pinching Serious/ fatal to workers (SOP’s) are available and
pouring • Cutting, Stabbing Injuries to • Shifting of clearly displayed.
& Puncturing workers and by workers while • Warning “Danger” tags (or
• Ergonomics & standers. concrete chipping similar) are affixed to all 1
Manual Handling is monitored. jackhammers under repair or
maintenance preventing
3
workers from using the
equipment.
03 Treatment • Crushing & Minor to PPE are available Safe operating procedures
application Pinching Serious/ fatal for workers. (SOP’s) are available and
• Cutting, Stabbing Injuries to clearly displayed. Warning
& Puncturing workers and by “Danger” tags (or similar)
Ergonomics & standers. 2 are affixed to all 1
Manual Handling jackhammers under repair or
maintenance preventing
workers from using the
equipment.
04 Curring Exposure to Minor to PPE are available MSDS should be followed in
chemicals Serious/ fatal for workers. handling chemicals.
Injuries to
2 1
workers and by
standers.
