Scribd
Upload
85 views4 pages

Responden Umur dan Pola Makan

The document analyzes characteristics of respondents and their children based on survey results. It finds that: 1. Most respondents were between ages 1-2 and the children were evenly split between boys and girls. 2. Over half the children were between ages 3-5. 3. Most children had good eating patterns but over half had poor nutritional status. 4. There is a significant relationship between children's eating patterns and nutritional status, with most children who had poor eating patterns also having poor nutritional status.

Uploaded by

Ifan Taufan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
85 views4 pages

Responden Umur dan Pola Makan

The document analyzes characteristics of respondents and their children based on survey results. It finds that: 1. Most respondents were between ages 1-2 and the children were evenly split between boys and girls. 2. Over half the children were between ages 3-5. 3. Most children had good eating patterns but over half had poor nutritional status. 4. There is a significant relationship between children's eating patterns and nutritional status, with most children who had poor eating patterns also having poor nutritional status.

Uploaded by

Ifan Taufan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Lampiran 5

Hasil Analisis SPSS 20

1. Karakteristik Responden

Umur Ortu
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
1,00 29 41,4 41,4 41,4
2,00 37 52,9 52,9 94,3
Valid 3,00 4 5,7 5,7 100,0
Total 70 100,0 100,0

JK Balita
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
L 35 50,0 50,0 50,0
Valid P 35 50,0 50,0 100,0
Total 70 100,0 100,0
Umur Balita
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
15,00 2 2,9 2,9 2,9
16,00 1 1,4 1,4 4,3
17,00 2 2,9 2,9 7,1
18,00 3 4,3 4,3 11,4
19,00 2 2,9 2,9 14,3
20,00 3 4,3 4,3 18,6
22,00 4 5,7 5,7 24,3
25,00 1 1,4 1,4 25,7
26,00 3 4,3 4,3 30,0
28,00 1 1,4 1,4 31,4
30,00 1 1,4 1,4 32,9
32,00 2 2,9 2,9 35,7
33,00 1 1,4 1,4 37,1
34,00 1 1,4 1,4 38,6
35,00 6 8,6 8,6 47,1
36,00 3 4,3 4,3 51,4
Valid 37,00 2 2,9 2,9 54,3
38,00 2 2,9 2,9 57,1
40,00 1 1,4 1,4 58,6
41,00 1 1,4 1,4 60,0
42,00 3 4,3 4,3 64,3
43,00 5 7,1 7,1 71,4
44,00 3 4,3 4,3 75,7
45,00 2 2,9 2,9 78,6
47,00 1 1,4 1,4 80,0
48,00 4 5,7 5,7 85,7
49,00 2 2,9 2,9 88,6
50,00 1 1,4 1,4 90,0
51,00 1 1,4 1,4 91,4
52,00 1 1,4 1,4 92,9
54,00 3 4,3 4,3 97,1
58,00 2 2,9 2,9 100,0
Total 70 100,0 100,0
2. Univariat

Pola Makan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Baik 44 62,9 62,9 62,9
Valid Kurang 26 37,1 37,1 100,0
Total 70 100,0 100,0

Status Gizi
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Baik 34 48,6 48,6 48,6
Valid Kurang 36 51,4 51,4 100,0
Total 70 100,0 100,0
3. Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pola Makan * Status Gizi 70 100,0% 0 0,0% 70 100,0%

Pola Makan * Status Gizi Crosstabulation


Status Gizi Total
Baik Kurang
Count 32 12 44
Expected Count 21,4 22,6 44,0
Baik % within Pola Makan 72,7% 27,3% 100,0%
% within Status Gizi 94,1% 33,3% 62,9%
% of Total 45,7% 17,1% 62,9%
Pola Makan
Count 2 24 26
Expected Count 12,6 13,4 26,0
Kurang % within Pola Makan 7,7% 92,3% 100,0%
% within Status Gizi 5,9% 66,7% 37,1%
% of Total 2,9% 34,3% 37,1%
Count 34 36 70
Expected Count 34,0 36,0 70,0
Total % within Pola Makan 48,6% 51,4% 100,0%
% within Status Gizi 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 48,6% 51,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 27,672a 1 ,000
Continuity Correction b
25,129 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 31,318 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association 27,276 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 70
A. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,63.
B. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Phi ,629 ,000
Nominal by Nominal Cramer's V ,629 ,000
Contingency Coefficient ,532 ,000
N of Valid Cases 70
A. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
B. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

You might also like