City Rail Link

In association with:
Demolition Works - Karangahape Station Construction Zone
Erosion and Sediment Control Management Plan

Document Ref:
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Revision: 3

11 April 2019

INTERNAL WORKING DOCUMENT

COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE
 Document control record
Document prepared by:
Aurecon New Zealand Limited
Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road
Newmarket Auckland 1023
PO Box 9762
Newmarket Auckland 1149
New Zealand

T +64 9 520 6019

F +64 9 524 7815
E [email protected]
W aurecongroup.com

A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of:

a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard
copy version.
b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.

Document control

Report title Demolition Works - Karangahape Station Construction Zone Erosion and Sediment Control
Management Plan

Document ID CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT- Project number 251926

0134

Client City Rail Link Limited Client contact Richard Jenkins r

Rev Date Revision details/status Prepared Author Verifier Approver

by
0 5 February Draft for internal review Kun Ma Kun Ma Tiaan Nel Anna
2019 Lindgren
1 7 February Draft for Client review Kun Ma Kun Ma Tiaan Nel Anna
2019 Lindgren
2 19 March Draft Final for Client review David David Tiaan Nel Anna
2019 Delagarza Delagarza Lindgren
3 11 April 2019 Final Draft David David Tiaan Nel Anna
Delagarza Delagarza Lindgren

Current revision 3

Approval

Author signature Approver signature

Name Kun Ma Name Anna Lindgren

Title Civil Engineer Title Associate

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

 Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 City Rail Link 1
1.2 Advance Works Project 1
1.3 Purpose 2
1.4 Scope 3
1.5 Report Structure 3

2 Project Description 4
2.1 General 4
2.2 Site Location Catchment 5

3 Erosion and Sediment Control 7

3.1 Design Philosophy 7
3.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Principles 7
3.2 Sediment Yield 7
3.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures 8
3.4 Design of erosion and sediment control devices 9
3.5 Specific erosion and sediment control devices 11
3.6 Monitoring 12

4 Conclusion 14

Appendices
Appendix A
ECSP Drawings

Appendix B
Glossary of Terminology & Abbreviations

Appendix C
ISCA Requirements

Figures
Figure 1 The proposed demolition at Mercury Lane 1
Figure 2 CRL Outline Plan Contents 2
Figure 3 Project Area 4
Figure 4 Project Area Upstream Catchment
Figure 5 The project site overland flow paths and flood prone area 6

Tables
Table 1: Sediment Yield 8
Table 2: Silt fence design criteria reproduced from GD05 (F1.3) 10
Table 3: Super Silt Fence Design Criteria reproduced from GD05 (F1.4) 10
Table 4: Stabilised construction entrance design specifications as per GD05 E2.6 11

i
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 1 Introduction
1.1 City Rail Link
The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4km
underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line
(NAL) near Mt Eden Station. CRL Enabling Works commenced in December 2015 and the
procurement of the main works contract (C3 Alliance) is being progressed with contract award likely in
the first quarter of 2019. To allow works to commence as soon as possible upon award of the C3
Alliance, City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) are obtaining the necessary authorisations for demolition of
buildings in the Karangahape Station Active Construction Zone (ACZ) and Construction Support Area
(CSA) between Mercury Lane and East Street.

1.2 Advance Works Project

It is proposed to demolish the buildings and structures required for the Karangahape Station ACZ and
CSA located at the future station entrance area between Mercury Lane and East Street, generally
bordered to the north by properties at 14 East Street and 9 Mercury Lane and to the south by Canada
Street (“the Project”), as identified in Figure 1 below. The Project is being undertaken in accordance
with the CRL Designation 2500-4, confirmed in November 2015 and the Aotea Station to North
Auckland Line (A2N) suite of resource consents approved in November 2016. The conditions of these
authorisations require the preparation of an Outline Plan (OP), Delivery Works Plans (DWP) and
Management Plans (MP). This Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) is prepared in accordance
with the CRL Designation and resource consent conditions and identified in the hierarchy of
documentation illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 1 The proposed demolition at Mercury Lane

1
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 Figure 2 CRL Outline Plan Contents

Buildings and structures to be demolished entirely in this Project are at located at the following
addresses:

▪ 9A, 9B, & 9C Mercury Lane

▪ 11-13 Mercury Lane

▪ 17-21 East Street

▪ 23-31 Mercury Lane

▪ 38 East Street

▪ 20-24 East Street

Structures to be partially demolished are:

▪ 18, 16 D and 16 E East Street

CRLL plan to commence the process of vacating the properties in the third quarter of 2019. This will
be done to ensure that all properties are vacant in reasonable time ahead of the planned
disconnection of services and so that comprehensive asbestos and contamination studies can be
undertaken.
Demolition will be undertaken in a sequential manner the order of which is to be confirmed by the C3
Alliance. All buildings and structures will be removed to ground level, with the retention of some
existing foundations where necessary for site stability. A soft strip (wall linings etc) of salvageable
materials and recycling of concrete and reinforcing steel will be carried out where possible. All
demolition material will be removed from the project area and disposed of at approved facilities.
The Project area will be fenced, with lockable gates, to prevent unauthorised entry. Where
appropriate, solid plywood fencing will be used, with appropriate signage prohibiting unauthorised
entry and identifying hazards.

1.3 Purpose
This ESCP has been developed by Aurecon New Zealand Limited (Aurecon) to describe the proposed
erosion and sediment control methods and practices to be implemented to minimise the effects of
demolition activities of the project and the potential consequential effects on the receiving
environment. It outlines the control measures which should be implemented within the project area by
the contractor to manage erosion and sediment. This report shall be read in conjunction with the
Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), Contaminated Soils Management Plan and
ESCP drawings (Appendix A).

2
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 The purpose of this ESCP is to provide a high-level management strategy for the erosion and
sediment generated from the demolition of the buildings and structures located at the future station
entrance area between Mercury Lane and East Street, generally bordered to the north by the
properties at 14 East Street and 9 Mercury Lane and to the south by Canada Street. The ESCP is
designed to fulfil compliance requirements of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) and
provisions of the AUP regarding the mitigation and management of soil erosion and sediment yield
related effects of the Project. It outlines the control measures to be implemented within the Project
area by the contractor to manage erosion and sediment.
It is expected that updates to the ESCP will be required once a preferred contractor has been selected
and a site-specific demolition methodology has been developed by the contractor. Requirements
associated with making any amendments to this ESCP (if required) are detailed in the CEMP
submitted as part of the Outline Plan for the Project.

1.4 Scope
This ESCP provides a summary of the proposed erosion and sediment control measures relevant to
the demolition of buildings in the Karangahape Station ACZ and CSA. This ESCP relates to all
temporary works required for the following:
 Demolition of buildings and structures (including foundations where appropriate);
 Removal of utilities;
 Site runoff management.
The implementation and monitoring of controls discussed within this ESCP are in accordance with
Auckland Council Guideline Document 2016/005 (GD05) “Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for
Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region.”
This ESCP supports the RMA authorisation1 for certification by Auckland Council and has been
prepared based on the “Demolition Methodology for Properties for Construction Support Area for
Karangahape Station (Mercury Lane and East Street Entrance)”.
This plan has been developed based on the currently available demolition methodology, it is expected
this will be updated following the confirmation of the preferred contractor and the development of a
site/building specific demolition plan. Updates and changes to the ESCP should be re-submitted for
Auckland Council certification.

1.5 Report Structure

The structure of the ESCP is designed to provide a logical and practical framework for the
management of erosion and sediment control measures as it relates to the Project. The ESCP has the
following key sections:

▪ Section 2 provides the Project general description, a description of the Project area and the
required demolition related works;

▪ Section 3 provides a detailed description of the erosion and sediment control measures proposed
for the Project area;
All drawings referenced throughout the report are attached in Appendix A of this report.

1 CRL Designation 2500-4 and R/LUC/2016/1890.

3
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 2 Project Description
2.1 General
The Project works involve the demolition of buildings and structures (including foundations where
appropriate) including the removal of utilities within the Project area and capping of three waters
services at the site boundaries. The Project area is located between Mercury Lane and East Street,
generally bordered to the north by properties at 14 East Street and 9 Mercury Lane and to the south
by Canada Street as shown in Figure 3 below.

Figure 3 Project Area

The Project area is approximately 6,100m2 and comprises the following addresses as shown in Figure
3 above:

▪ 9A, 9B, & 9C Mercury Lane

▪ 11-13 Mercury Lane

▪ 17-21 East Street

▪ 23-31 Mercury Lane

▪ 38 East Street

▪ 20-24 East Street

Structures to be partially demolished are:

▪ 18, 16 D and 16 E East Street

4
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 The demolition work for the Project is expected to last approximately 8 to 12 weeks and programmed
to commence late 2019.
The properties at the northern end of the demolition area are likely to be the first that are available for
both preconstruction activities and demolition, and therefore the demolition programme will commence
in this area and progress southward towards Canada Street. As demolition commences on these
properties, it is expected that the Mercury Plaza site will be vacated and become available (23-31
Mercury Lane and 38 East St), and therefore preconstruction activities and the demolition itself can be
advanced at the southern section of the site.

2.2 Site Location Catchment

Demolition Area

Mercury Lane

Canada Street Overland flow path

Catchment Boundary

Figure 4 Project Area Upstream Catchment

The topography of the catchment surrounding the project area is hilly with an approximate area of 10.4
ha. Figure 4 shows overland flow paths and flood plains for a 1 in 100 year rainfall event with the
project area highlighted in yellow. Overland flow around the site travels south down Mercury Lane and
East Street, then in a westerly direction where it collects in the flood prone areas shown on Figure 4
above.

2.2.1 Site description

This area is bordered by Mercury Lane to the east, East Street to the west and Canada Street to the
south, with the northern boundary generally adjoining 14 East Street and 9 Mercury Lane as shown on
Figure 4. It is approximately 6,100m2 and is occupied by several existing buildings and hardstand
areas.
The site will be delineated by solid timber hoardings and have an entrance gate to prevent
unauthorised entrance.

2.2.2 Site levels and grade

The general topography of the site is sloping south towards Canada Street. The ground elevation at
the northern boundary of the Project is RL 63m and falls to RL 52m at the low point on the southern
project boundary towards Canada Street. The distance from the northern to the southern project
boundary is approximately 120m, equating to an average grade across the site of approximately 1:11,
or 9%.

5
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 2.2.3 Site overland flow paths and flood plains
Auckland Council GIS shows that a flood prone area is located at the southern boundary of the project
area. The site is generally bounded on the east, west and south by overland flow paths that are
coincident with the streets around the project area. A further flood prone area and floodplain are
located to the southwest of the project area. Flood prone areas and overland flow paths are shown in
Figure 5 to follow.

Figure 5 The project site overland flow paths and flood prone area

6
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 3 Erosion and Sediment
Control
3.1 Design Philosophy
The construction environment of the Project related works is a highly developed urban area,
predominantly formed of hard impervious paved areas and buildings. To construct the Project, the
proposed works will require the demolition of the existing buildings in the Project area previously
described. The proposed controls will ensure sediment generated on site will largely be contained
within the site boundaries, resulting in minimal effect on the surrounding built environment.

3.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Principles

Erosion and sediment control measures will be established to minimise the extent of soil erosion and
sediment yield from the Project area during construction. Erosion and sediment control measures will
be implemented and monitored in accordance with Auckland Council’s “Erosion and sediment control
guide for land disturbing activities” in the Auckland Region, known as GD05. The GD05 is an update
of Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 (TP90) “Erosion and sediment control guidelines for land
disturbing activities” in the Auckland Region and supersedes that guideline.
All erosion and sediment control measures shall be fully established within the Project before any
physical works can commence in the area. Removal of devices and reinstatement of the surrounding
ground upon completion of the works shall form part of the civil component of the project and shall be
managed by the contractor.

3.1.1 Existing Stormwater Infrastructure

The project area including the upstream surrounding catchments is serviced by a reticulated
stormwater network.
Proposed controls to protect this system during the works include:

▪ Protecting the stormwater inlets - Using filter cloths/silt socks across inlets in accordance with
GD05 guidelines;

▪ Sediment dispersion control - Stabilised entrance and exits with vehicle wash-down facilities is to
be provided;

▪ Treating groundwater – Encountering groundwater onsite is not expected however, if required,

groundwater will be pumped to a settlement tank prior to discharge to the existing stormwater
network, minor dewatering will be discharged to stabilised surfaces and will be treated via
downstream inlet catchpit protection measures; and

▪ Isolation of demolition areas – All demolition areas will be isolated from the surrounding
environment to ensure clean water is diverted away from construction areas and that all
construction related run off from the Project area is collected and treated prior to discharge.

3.2 Sediment Yield

Table 1 shows the sediment yield with and without erosion and sediment control measures. The
calculation of the sediment yield is based on the Universal Sediment Loss Equation (USLE).
Demolition is generally deemed to include foundations and the removal and disposal of all demolished
material and disturbed ground. For the purposes of establishing the sediment yield, it is assumed that
the existing building foundations and hardfill are to be removed and the underlying soil exposed.
Based on geological borings from the site, the surface material is described as fill, which is generally
1-2 metres thick, with a maximum depth of 4 metres. The fill is generally described as pavements with

7
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 granular sub-grades, however weathered East Coast Bays Formation (ECBF) and lenses of silt are
also described. Based on this information, it is assumed the soil type consists of a mix of sand, silt,
and clay. This was used to determine the soil erodibility factor K of 0.26. This factor is likely to be
significantly conservative, as the demolition is likely to leave the existing hardfill beneath the buildings
in place, as well as keeping the site level / terraced to the existing building platforms.
The demolition works is assumed to take 8-12 weeks. Refer to the demolition methodology for
updated information on the demolition works. A 75% sediment control efficiency is assumed with
sediment controls in place.

Table 1: Sediment Yield

Time Sediment Yield Sediment Yield

Area Area (ha) (weeks) without ESC with ESC
The Project Area 0.61 8-12 3.53 0.88

3.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

3.3.1 General
The main sources of erosion for the site will be splash and sheet erosion in rainfall events. To
minimise the generation and discharge of sediment the following key principals will be applied in
accordance with GD05:

▪ Employing sediment retention devices where practical;

▪ Rapidly stabilise exposed areas; and

▪ Minimise the areas of disturbance (both duration of works and physical area).
By exposing only those areas that are required to be exposed for active demolition/earthworking at
any one time, the duration of exposure and risk of erosion/sediment discharge can also be minimised.
The control methods used will ensure:

▪ Stabilisation and cover of exposed areas as soon as practically possible;

▪ Installation of perimeter controls to protect the receiving environment from the demolition/earthworks;
and

▪ Capture and treatment of sediment laden water generated by the site works.

3.3.2 Proposed Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

Sediment loading is anticipated to be low as demolition/construction works will be undertaken using
the following controls to minimise erosion potential and reduce sediment loads to the receiving
stormwater network prior to discharge from the Project area (refer to drawings in Appendix A)

▪ Isolation of Project area – The work site shall include perimeter hoardings and temporary fencing
to ensure separation of the work site from the public;

▪ Diverting road runoff – Ensure hot-mix bund is installed adjacent to the proposed works. As
shown on drawings in Appendix A, the hot mix bund is positioned below site hoarding to prevent
clean/dirty water infiltrating through the base of the hoardings and divert water to the nearest
catchpit;

▪ Stormwater inlet protection – The existing network at the Project area is a fully reticulated pipe
network common to a developed urban environment. All catchpits within and in the vicinity of the
works site are to be protected using geofabric filter cloth across inlets in accordance with GD05
section F1.6. A silt sock is also to be placed completely around the inlet in accordance with GD05
section F1.5 as an added measure to act as a small sediment trap upstream of the catchpit. No
discharge of surface or groundwater to wastewater systems is proposed;

▪ Managing surface water – Surface site runoff within the Project area shall generally be collected at
silt fences ensuring treatment of sediment. Where flows are excessive, or ponding occurs pumping

8
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 to a settlement tank or similar measure, shall be put in place to ensure flows are collected and
treated prior to discharge from site. Overland flows surrounding the site are not expected to enter
the site at any point but expected to follow the roadside kerb and channel along East Street and
Mercury Lane. The only location where overland flow may breakthrough into the site would be from
the flood prone area located at the southern boundary of the site towards Canada Street. This area
is protected by a silt fence within site hoardings. However should the proposed silt fence be
deemed insufficient, or if there is need to accommodate a break in the hoardings, a super silt fence
should be utilised. Should this occur the area should also be protected with geotextile fabric or
similar, and the use of sandbags to provide additional separation should be considered.

▪ Dewatering – Ponding water or groundwaters are to be pumped to the settlement tank or similar for
storage and treatment. Water treated through sediment settling is decanted from the settlement
tank and discharged to the existing stormwater network or onto a stabilised flat area for sheet flow
dispersion to a nearby catchpit;

▪ Treatment of surface water – Surface site runoff within the Project area shall fall to an existing
catchpit or proposed catchpit with inlet protection;

▪ Water Quality – Batch dosing of any collected stormwater may be required subject to water quality
testing conducted on the final discharge as indicated on the plans. A testing regime shall be
established at the discharge point of all treatment facilities to ensure minimum water quality
standards are met. Water quality testing requirements are outlined within the Water Quality
Assessment submitted as part of the A2N resource consent. Note that if the testing determines that
the flocculent treatment is required at the site, then a Flocculent Treatment Plan is required to be
prepared and submitted to Auckland Council for certification prior to proceeding further with the
construction works. See Appendix C for ISCA requirements.

▪ Open excavations – Excavated material shall be loaded straight onto trucks, where possible. Refer
Section 3.5 for details if spoil/fill or demolition debris is to be stored on site temporarily. Extensive
open excavations are not expected for the Project works. Should excavations and potholing be
required they shall be covered in situations of high rainfall risk;

▪ Temporary and permanent site access - Access routes are expected to be impervious stabilised
areas however if bare earth is exposed, stabilised entry/exit points shall be provided with basic
vehicle wash-down facilities to prevent transport of sediment off site;

▪ Dust control – Dust production on site is expected to occur from demolition of existing buildings,
material stockpiles if applicable and excavated ground areas. The Contractor is required to manage
dust as required through damping exposed areas utilising water carts and/or sprinklers.
Construction of stabilised entrances and pathways are provided to limit dust generation. Regular
monitoring of dust emissions and minimising areas of exposed soils to wind through construction
staging is proposed;

▪ Loading trucks – Vehicles such as loading trucks are expected to travel solely along the stabilised
access routes and are not expected to be accessing the exposed areas. However, if vehicles
access the exposed areas, then a wash-down area and facility is to be provided to ensure vehicles
are not carrying loose sediment; and

▪ Wet weather – During an unforeseen rainfall event that limits carrying out the work, the work shall
be stopped, and the erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked to ensure they are
operating correctly and upgraded or modified where necessary. Any open exposed areas should be
suitably covered in anticipation of a rainfall event;
Specific control measures for each the demolition area are detailed in the following sections and
drawings in Appendix A.

3.4 Design of erosion and sediment control devices

Drawings detailing control measures are included in Appendix A of this report. As a summary, the
following control devices listed below are proposed across the sites. Details of each specific area are
provided in consecutive sections.

▪ Asphalt bunds (section E2.1 of GD05);

9
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 ▪ Super silt fences (section F1.4 of GD05);

▪ Silt fences (section F1.3 of GD05);

▪ Silt socks/filter cloth (section F1.5 of GD05);

▪ Geotextile and Erosion control blankets (section E3.5 of GD05);

▪ Settlement tanks (section G1.0 of GD05);

▪ Catchpit inlet protection (section F1.6 of GD05); and

▪ Stabilised construction access (section E2.6 of GD05).

Silt fences
Silt fences will be provided along the site perimeter in areas where runoff could leave the site (refer to
Appendix A). Ground surface slopes where silt fences have been proposed are expected to be just
greater than 2% grade in some areas. Length and spacings are to be in accordance with the design
criteria as shown in Table 2 as specified GD05 F1.3.

Table 2: Silt fence design criteria reproduced from GD05 (F1.3)

Ground surface slope Slope length (m) (maximum) Spacing of returns (m)
steepness %
Flatter than 2% Unlimited N/A
2 – 10% 40 60
10 – 20% 30 50
20 – 33% 20 40
33 – 50% 15 30
> 50% 6 20

Super silt fences

Super silt fences are not expected to be required but should be utilised if the suggested silt fence
proposed at the southern boundary of the site towards Canada Street is deemed insufficient, if there is
a break in the hoarding required, or in the unlikely scenario that overland flow breaks through at this
point. If a super silt fence is utilised length and spacings are to be in accordance with the design
criteria as shown in Table 3 as specified GD05 F1.3.

Table 3: Super Silt Fence Design Criteria reproduced from GD05 (F1.4)

Ground surface slope Slope length (m) Spacing of returns Super silt fence length
steepness % (maximum) (m) (m) (maximum)
0 – 10% Unlimited 60 Unlimited
10 – 20% 60 50 450
20 – 33% 30 40 300
33 – 50% 30 30 150
> 50% 15 20 75

Catchpit Inlet Protection

Geofabrics are to be placed underneath catchpit grates that are immediately adjacent or within the works
site in general accordance to GD05 section F1.6. In addition, a silt sock (refer to GD05 section F1.5) will
be placed around inlets or catchpits. The silt sock will completely ‘ring fence’ the catchpit to enable
treatment of runoff prior to entering the network.

10
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 Settlement Tank
It is expected that only very minor earthworks will be required for this Project. An area for placement of
a settlement tank and pump has been allowed for on the plans in accordance with GD05 G1.0 should
this be required. This should be used as required for dewatering of open excavations, potholing and
groundwater. A minimum of 100 mm water clarity is required as per GD05 for pumping directly offsite.

Interim Stabilisation
During active demolition, slope and soil stabilisation procedures will be used to prevent erosion on
exposed steep slopes. The stabilisation measures will consist of surface roughening and contour
drains which are intended to prevent rill erosion on exposed steep surfaces. Refer to Section 3.5 for a
discussion of the interim slope protection measures.

Long term Stabilisation

Following the completion of demolition works, slope and soil stabilisation procedures will be used to
prevent erosion on the steep slopes. Exposed slopes are to be protected by temporary geotextile cover,
erosion control blanket, or hydro-mulching in accordance with GD05. Refer to Section 3.5 for a
discussion of the locations requiring slope protection.

Stabilised construction vehicle entranceways and wheel wash

Stabilised construction entrances (refer to Appendix A for plan and details) will be constructed as per
GD05 E2.6 requirements. Aggregate used to construct the stabilised site entrance is to be in
accordance with the specification in Table 4 as per GD05 E2.6. Stabilised entrances are to drain back
onto the site or an asphalt speed hump is to be provided to prevent runoff leaving the site from the site
entrance. In addition, a wheel wash facility is to be provided within the entranceway.

Table 4: Stabilised construction entrance design specifications as per GD05 E2.6

Design parameter Specification

Aggregate Size 50-150 mm washed aggregate
Minimum thickness 150mm
Minimum length 10 m
Minimum width 4m

3.5 Specific erosion and sediment control devices

▪ Hoardings around the site perimeter will prevent dirty water leaving the site. Clean water will be
conveyed by the existing street kerb and gutter systems, following existing OLFPs around the site.
Hoardings will also prevent overland flow paths from entering the site. There is a significant OLFP
and associated flood prone area along Canada Road on the south side of the site. As a means of
further protection against sediment seepage through the hoardings during potential inundation
events, a silt fence is proposed to be placed inside the hoarding in this location.

▪ The exposed ground surface of the Project area shall be stabilised as each area is disturbed.
Disturbed ground will be immediately stabilised using surface roughening. Depending on the
demolition methodology and interim site grading, different interim stabilisation methodologies may
be used. If the site remains terraced by the existing building platforms, interim surface roughening
will be used on all exposed areas. However, if the site is uniformly graded to drain to the south
contour drains will be used to prevent rill erosion from occurring through the exposed areas. The
ECSP plans assume that the site has been uniformly graded and show the appropriate erosion
control measures.

▪ Depending on the time between the completion of demolition works and the beginning of
construction on the site, long term stabilisation measures may be required. Long term stabilisation
is used to control ongoing erosion from rain events as well as for dust management. In general, if
the site is to be left undisturbed for more than two weeks, long term stabilisation will be established.
Long term stabilisation may include geotextile mats, erosion control blanket, or hydro-mulching. As
with the interim stabilisation measures, the magnitude of the interim measures will be dependent on
the final grading following demolition. If the building platforms are retained and the site remains

11
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 terraced, the steep slopes between the terraces will require significant stabilisation, whilst flat
platforms may be left roughened, with appropriate dust control employed. Conversely, if the entire
site is graded to the south, the entire site will require slope stabilisation measures including
geotextile mats, erosion control blanket, or hydro-mulching.

▪ Indicative site access is required by GD05; two access points have been assumed to be via
Mercury Lane. Where possible existing pavement is to be retained or suitable hardfill placed to
provide a stabilised site entrance and exit in accordance with GD05 E2.6.

▪ There are several existing catchpits within the project area. These catchpits will collect all flow from
the project area. The proposed dirty water diversions flow to the southern catchpit, however, if the
existing pavement is retained, asphalt bunding may be required to divert flow from the eastern dirty
water diversion away from the proposed site access.

▪ Inlet protection with filter cloths and silt socks will also be installed for all existing catchpits.

▪ Ponding water within the site will be pumped to the indicative location of the settlement tanks if
deemed to be required by the Contractor. This has been positioned to allow discharge of clean
water to the existing stormwater water network in Canada Street via gravity.

▪ A silt fence will be installed inside the proposed hoarding along the southern site boundary adjacent
to Canada Street. This silt fence is intended to prevent sediment-laden water from flowing through
the hoarding in the event of high flow inundation from the OLFP on Canada Street or its associated
flood prone area.

3.5.1 Site Spoil, Fill Material and Demolition Debris

Storage of excavated spoil, engineering fill, drainage materials or demolition debris will be limited at
the worksite for the Project. Material from demolition is to be loaded directly into waiting trucks and
disposed offsite as early as possible. However, if any debris is to be stockpiled temporarily it shall be
stored on the up-slope side of any trenches if possible or in a stabilised area such as the area
available for the contractor which is away from the overland flow paths or exposed areas. Stockpiles
shall be suitably compacted and covered by geotextile fabric to minimise sediment runoff and dust
migration at the end of each day or when rain is forecast. Silt fences or other sediment control
measures in accordance to GD05 shall be provided around the spoil storage area to prevent transport
of sediment.

3.5.2 Reinstatement and Rehabilitation

On completion of the demolition works, the contractor will be required to:

▪ Ensure all excavations are backfilled and formed with approved material;

▪ Reinstate any utilities which were suspended or protected during construction;

▪ Erosion and sediment controls within the site, including silt socks and silt fences shall remain
following demolition until such time as the site has been fully stabilised, or the construction phase
erosion control measures are in place. The inlet protection measures outside the site boundary will
be removed following the completion of active demolition work.
All reinstatement and rehabilitation works shall ensure that any sediment within these controls will be
disposed of appropriately and care taken to ensure it does not discharge into the stormwater network
or become susceptible to dispersion by overland flow paths.

3.6 Monitoring
As part of implementing the ESCP, the contractor will provide ongoing site monitoring to ensure that
all proposed erosion and sediment control measures are installed correctly and continue to operate
effectively and in the manner that was intended for the full duration of the works.
All controls shall be inspected as a minimum weekly and following any heavy rain events to ensure
devices continue to operate effectively.

12
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 The following is an indicative outline of the inspection and maintenance regime proposed to ensure
the erosion and sediment controls for the Project are maintained appropriately during construction:

▪ The Contractor shall inspect all control measures at the end of week/work period as a minimum and
after every rainfall and periods of prolonged rainfall;

▪ All measures will be maintained in good working order;

▪ Stabilised areas including entrances are to be maintained.

▪ The Contractor shall monitor dust emissions on a daily basis, at a minimum. In windy dry conditions,
dust emissions are to be monitored continuously. Water shall be reapplied as required to retain a
moist ground in dry conditions.

▪ The Project Engineer will be advised by the Contractor of any maintenance or remedial works
undertaken, or any changes required to the ESCP to accommodate changes in conditions or work
programme;

▪ Any change in the work programme requiring a significant change in the ESCP shall be approved
by the Project Engineer and Auckland Council prior to installation;

▪ The Contractor shall maintain records on site of erosion inspections and will make available any
reports at the request of the Project Engineer.
A maintenance and inspections regime shall be established in consultation with the relevant Auckland
Council representative and may require more regular inspections subject to the risk profile associated
with each measure. ESC construction quality checklists for each measure are also available in
Appendix C of the Auckland Council GD05 which may be used on site for guidance.

13
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
 4 Conclusion
The Karangahape Station ACZ and CSA demolition work will require specific erosion and sediment
control measures to be implemented to mitigate the environmental effects of the construction works.
This ESCP provides a framework for identifying and implementing erosion and sediment controls
during the demolition works. A design philosophy and number of design principles have been provided
along with specific control methodologies for the works.
It is the contractor’s responsibility to further develop or modify the ESCP measures based on the final
demolition methodology. Requirements associated with making any amendments to this ESCP shall
be defined in the CEMP which will be submitted as part of the Project outline plan. All controls shall be
fully established before any physical works are undertaken and monitored in accordance with the
Auckland Council GD05
Based on the proposed sediment and erosion controls detailed in this report, the effects of the
demolition work can be managed in accordance with the CRL designation and resource consent
conditions, statutory regulations and best management practices.

14
CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0134
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Project 251926 | 11 April 2019 | Revision 3
Appendices
Appendix A
ECSP Drawings

Document Description
CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1191-A City Rail Link Karangahape Road- Demolition Works Erosion
and Sediment Control General Notes
CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1192-A City Rail Link Karangahape Road- Demolition Works Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan Mercury Lane and East Street
CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1193-A City Rail Link Karangahape Road- Demolition Works Erosion
and Sediment Control General Details
 GENERAL NOTES LEVEL AND SETOUT NOTES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
1. SURVEY INFORMATION DOES NOT INCLUDE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY OR IN SITU 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
1. ALL WORKS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROJECT DRAWINGS AND BOUNDARY MARKING UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED. WHERE CADASTRAL BOUNDARIES ARE
SPECIFICATIONS AND CURRENT AUCKLAND COUNCIL AND AUCKLAND TRANSPORT 2. SITE LAYOUT IS INDICATIVE ONLY, AND IS TO BE CONFIRMED AT DETAILED DESIGN STAGE.
SHOWN, THEY HAVE BEEN SOURCED FROM LANDONLINE XML DATA AND ARE SUBJECT TO
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS SURVEY. WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROJECT DRAWINGS AND 3. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO SITE AND BUILDING SPECIFIC DEMOLITION METHODOLOGY.
AND COUNCIL STANDARDS SHALL BE RAISED WITH THE ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION, SPECIFICATIONS AND CURRENT AUCKLAND COUNCIL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. BACKGROUND SURVEY INFORMATION (EXISTING CONTOURS) AND AERIAL PHOTO HAVE
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND COUNCIL STANDARDS SHALL BE BEEN EXTRACTED FROM AUCKLAND COUNCIL GEOMAPS.
2. THE EXACT EXTENT OF WORKS SHALL BE CONFIRMED ON SITE BY THE ENGINEER DURING RAISED WITH THE ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SURVEY
CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION. COORDINATES USED ARE IN TERMS OF MT EDEN GD 2000 COORDINATE. 5. ANY STOCKPILE OF MATERIAL ONSITE SHOULD BE COVERED TO MINIMISE LOSSES AND NOT
BE LOCATED IN OVERLAND FLOW PATHS OR SITE LOW POINTS.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL LEVELS ARE METRES RELATIVE TO THE DATUM. 2. LEVEL INFORMATION IS IN TERMS OF AKL (MSL) 1946 DATUM.
6. ALL RUBBISH, VEGETATION, DEBRIS ETC SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE
4. DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATION. ALL 3. THE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM LASER DEMOLITION/EARTHWORKS AREA AND DISPOSED OFF SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
DISCREPANCIES AND VARIATIONS SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE ENGINEER FOR DECISION SCAN SURVEYS UNDERTAKEN BETWEEN 2012 AND 2015 FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC COMMENCEMENT OF SITE CLEARANCE.
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. REALM LANDSCAPING DESIGN ON THE CITY RAIL LINK PROJECT. ALL DETAIL IS SUBJECT TO
VERIFICATION ON SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A MOBILE SETTLEMENT TANK FOR DEWATERING OR
5. DIMENSIONS SHALL NOT BE OBTAINED BY SCALING FROM THE DRAWINGS. SIMILAR DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE TO GD05
4. SURVEY INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLEMENTED BY INFORMATION FROM AUCKLAND SECTION G1.0. THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF THE TANKS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE
6. ALL WORK SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN SAFELY AND IN A MANNER MEETING ALL OBLIGATIONS COUNCIL GIS RECORDS. THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION CANNOT BE CONFIRMED
UNDER THE HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK ACT 2015. ENGINEER.
AND THE LOCATION AND LEVEL OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND SERVICES WITHIN THE
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR SPECIALIST EQUIPMENT AS NECESSARY AND SAFE EXTENT OF WORKS SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO 8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO ANY
ENVIRONS FOR ANY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER OR HIS/HER CONSTRUCTION. OTHER WORK COMMENCING ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND
REPRESENTATIVES ON SITE. ATTEND A PRELIMINARY SEDIMENT CONTROL MEETING ON SITE WITH THE ENGINEER AND A
REPRESENTATIVE FROM AUCKLAND COUNCIL.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SITE AND BUILDING SPECIFIC DEMOLITION PLAN.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE COUNCIL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE
9. RAIL ALIGNMENTS AND CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DURING THE DEMOLITION/CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND AT THE SITE ENTRANCE TO
RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS (RIC). CONTROL ALL DUST, SILT, MUD AND SEDIMENT GENERATED BY THE WORKS AS TO NOT
10. THE CONSTRUCTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE AND/OR ENTER AUCKLAND COUNCIL STORMWATER SYSTEM.
OF WORK. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION 10. FURTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AS THE PROJECT
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. ADVANCES. THESE WILL BE INSTALLED AS AND WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THE SITE HAS EFFECTIVE
SILT DETENTION FACILITIES OPERATING AT ALL TIMES.
EXISTING SERVICES 11. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
1. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND SERVICES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE AUCKLAND COUNCIL GD05.
APPROXIMATE ONLY AND BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY NETWORK UTILITY 12. ALL EXISTING CATCHPITS LOCATED WITHIN THE SITE AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE
OPERATORS (NUO) AND KIWIRAIL. SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED.
NO LIABILITY IS ACCEPTED FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE PLOTTED
SERVICES. OTHER UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD SERVICES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT 13. EXISTING STORMWATER NETWORK SOURCED FROM AUCKLAND COUNCIL GEOMAPS.
SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 14. SILT FENCES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM 3m CLEARANCE FROM OPERATING RAIL TRACK
2. PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK INVOLVING EXCAVATION OR PENETRATIONS (PILING, CENTRELINES, IF THIS CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, THE ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE ALLOWED
DRILLING ETC) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SERVICES USING CLEARANCE.
NUO DATA AND HAVE ALL SERVICES MARKED OUT ACCURATELY ON SITE USING NUO ON 15. EXISTING SERVICES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM UTILITY COMPANIES RECORD MAPS AND
SITE LOCATION SERVICES PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE. ARE INDICATIVE ONLY. THE DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN AS A COMPLETE AND
3. PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION OR PENETRATION WORK IN ANY ACCURATE RECORD OF THE SERVICES WITHIN THE AREA OF WORKS. ALL LOCATIONS ARE
PART OF A LEGAL ROAD OR OTHER PUBLIC AREA THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND TO BE CONFIRMED ON SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH THE RELEVANT SERVICE
UPLIFT CORRIDOR ACCESS PERMITS AND MEET ALL ASSOCIATED REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITY REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.
NUO. 16. ALL THREE WATERS LATERALS SERVICING DEMOLISHED BUILDINGS TO BE CAPPED AT THE
pw:\\designshare.au.aurecon.info:PW_PROD_AU\Documents\Projects\23xxxx\239933 - City Rail Link CDE\01-WIP\Drawings\CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1191.dwg

4. PRIOR TO COMMENCING PIPE, CABLE OR DUCT LAYING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR BOUNDARY.
SHALL POTHOLE ALL POTENTIAL SERVICE CONFLICTS AND ANY UNLEVELLED MAINS AT 17. ALL EXPOSED GROUND SURFACES SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABLISED IMMEDIATELY UPON
CONNECTION POINTS AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER, TO ALLOW HIM/HER TO ACCURATELY DISTURBANCE. TEMPORARY STABILISATION SHALL CONSIST OF SURFACE ROUGHENING
LOCATE AND LEVEL THE SERVICES EXPOSED AND IF NECESSARY UNDERTAKE DESIGN AND CONTOUR DRAINS LONG TERM. STABILISATION CONSISTING OF GEOTEXTILE,
MODIFICATIONS TO THE ALIGNMENT OR LONGSECTION OF THE NEW WORK. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR HYDROMULCHING SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 2
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND UPLIFT ALL UTILITY PERMITS/CONSENTS, AND WEEKS FOLLOWING DISTURBANCE.
SATISFY ANY NUO REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO UNDERTAKING ANY EXCAVATION OR UTILITY 18. THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT
INSTALLATION WORK. CONTROL REPORT FOR THE MT EDEN CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AREA & ACTIVE
6. ALL STATUTORY AUTHORITIES SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION, CONSTRUCTION ZONE.
EXCAVATION OR EARTHWORKS TAKING PLACE IN PUBLIC PLACES AND RELEVANT
NETWORK UTILITY OPERATORS NOTIFIED WHEN WORKING IN PROXIMITY TO THEIR
SERVICES.
7. WHEN WORKS WILL AFFECT ROAD ACCESS OR ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES, THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL BE GIVEN AT LEAST 5 DAYS’ NOTICE OF THE NATURE AND
DURATION OF ANY IMPACTS AND ALL EMERGENCY SERVICES SHALL BE NOTIFIED.
8. ANY EXCAVATION NEAR ANY EXISTING UTILITY CABLE OR PRESSURE SERVICE (EG GAS,
WATER OR SEWER RISING MAIN) SHALL BE ADVISED TO THE RELEVANT NUO AT LEAST TWO
DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK AND WHERE REQUIRED SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN
WITH OVERSIGHT BY A NUO REPRESENTATIVE.
Auckland
22/02/2019 2:51:28 PM

ORIGINAL DRAWING IN COLOUR CLIENT REV DATE REVISION DETAILS APPROVED SCALE SIZE
PRELIMINARY PROJECT
CITY RAIL LINK
A 22.02.19 PRELIMINARY ISSUE A.LINDGREN NOT TO SCALE A1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN
H.ARSHAD
APPROVED
. DATE
KARANGAHAPE ROAD - DEMOLATION WORKS
DESIGNED
TITLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
D.DELAGARZA GENERAL NOTES
CHECKED PROJECT ZONE DISCIPLINE ELEMENT TYPE SHEET REVISION
DOCUMENT
T.NEL A.LINDGREN CRL KRD UTI 000 DRG 1191 A
0 20mm 40 60 80 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
ORIGINAL SIZE
 SW
5 60
.8
60.6 60.6
NOTE:

SW
12 SW
11-13 60.4
60.4
2 1. REFER TO DRAWING CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1191 FOR ALL NOTES.
.6
60
2. REFER TO UTILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ALL SERVICES.

SW
SW
60.2

3. ALL THREE WATERS LATERALS SERVICING DEMOLISHED BUILDINGS TO BE

SW

SW
60
.2
.4
60
CAPPED AT THE BOUNDARY.
SW SW
225Ø SW 4. ALL EXPOSED GROUND SURFACES SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABLISED

SW

60.0
SW SW
60.0

SW

SW
SW IMMEDIATELY UPON DISTURBANCE. TEMPORARY STABILISATION SHALL

.2

SW
60
SW SW
7 SW SW SW CONSIST OF SURFACE ROUGHENING AND CONTOUR DRAINS LONG TERM.

59.8
59.8
SW

60.2
SW STABILISATION CONSISTING OF GEOTEXTILE, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET

59.4
14

SW

59.6
450Ø SW
OR HYDROMULCHING SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 2 WEEKS

SW
59.6

SW
FOLLOWING DISTURBANCE.

59.4
60.2
5. WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL BY FILTER CLOTH AND SILT SOCKS IS

SW

59.4

59.2
60.0
STABILIZED CP 6 DEEMED INSUFFICIENT BY THE CONTRACTOR, SETTLEMENT TANKS ARE

SW
SW
59.2 59.0
VEHICLE 59
.8
SW SW TO BE PROVIDED. THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF THE TANKS ARE TO BE

SW
SW 4REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER.
SW ENTRANCE 59.0
58.8

6. DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EROSION AND

SW
SW
58.6
CP 5

58.8
SW SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FOR THE KARANGAHAPE STATION

SW
16 58.4

SW
.6
58.6
SW 59
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AREAS.
EET
58.2
58.4

SW
.2

STR
SW 58
7. ALL CATCHPITS FOUND ON SITE ARE TO BE PROTECTED WITH FILTER

SW
S
ATO
58.0
SW CLOTHS AND SILT SOCKS.
SW GAL 58.2 58

SW
.0 58

59.4
.2

SW
SW
SW

SHAFT
57.8

58.0
57

VOID
.8
SW

59.2
INDICATIVE VEHICLE

58.8
SW

59.0
WASHDOWN AREA SW CROSS STREET

SW
SW
57.6 SW SW SW

58.8
SW SW

SW
SW

58.6
18 SW SW SW

58.4
SW SW

58.2
58
.0 SW SW SW

SW
58.0 57.4 SW SW SW
57.6 SW

SW
SW
57.8 57.4 57.8

SW
57.8
57.2

57.6

57.4
57 .6
.2 57

.8
57
57.0
CP 4

57.4
SW

SW
57.0
56.8

SW
CONTRACTOR TO

57.2
17 19 56.8
56
.6 56.6

SW CONFIRM EXISTING 57
.0
TEMPORARY STABILISATION:
EAS

15

SW
56.8 56.4

CATCHPIT LOCATION SURFACE ROUGHENING AND1

T ST

56.6 56.4
56.2
CONTOUR DRAINS ON ALL
SW

56.4
REE

DISTURBED GROUND.

SW
56.2
56.2 56.0
T

56.0
56.0
SW

55.8
LONG TERM STABILISATION:

SW
55.8

20 GEOTEXTILE, EROSION CONTROL

450Ø
55.8 55.6
55.6

BLANKET OR HYDRO MULCHING

SW

55.4
55.4 55.6

SW
58.0

SW
58.0

.0
57.8
.8

58 55.4
57

57.8 55
.6

55.2
55
.4
57.6

.6
SW

55
55.2
57.8

SW
57.4

55.0
57.6
55.4
57.2 55.0
SW

57.4

21

.8
.2

SW
57.0

54
55
57.2

54.8
56.8

.0
SW

55
57.0

56.6

SW
54.8
54.6
56.8

54.6
SW
56.6

SW
56.4

54.6
56.2 54.4
54.4
56.4

23

54.2
SW

56.0

56.2
THE CONTRACTOR TO ADVISE IF

SW
54.4
55.8

56.0
55.6
THEY NEED SECOND SITE ACCESS
SW

54.2
24 FOR THE DEMOLITION WORK. THE SW SW
55.8 SW

54.2
54.0
55.4
SW

SW

MER
LOCATION OF THE ACCESS TO BE
pw:\\designshare.au.aurecon.info:PW_PROD_AU\Documents\Projects\23xxxx\239933 - City Rail Link CDE\01-WIP\Drawings\CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1192.dwg

55.6 55.2 54.2

SW
AGREED WITH ENGINEER AND
SW

.0

CUR
54
SW
375Ø

25-27 55.4 55.0

53.8 THE ESC MEASURES ARE BE THE

SW
SW

Y LA
SW 23-31
55.2
54.8 54
SAME AS THE PROPOSED ACCESS SW
SW

.0

54.0
ON THE NORTHERN END. SW

NE
54.6
55.0

53.8

SW
54.8 SW
SW

53.8
54.4 53.6

54
.6 CP 7 38
SW

53.6
54.2
SW
54.4
INDICATIVE LOCATION OF 53.6

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND

SW
54.0
SW
SW SEDIMENT TANK IF REQUIRED 53.6
SW 54.2
53.4
SW 32
16 54.8 53.8
53.4
SW EXISTING

53.4
SW

SW
SW EXISTING OVERLAND FLOW PATH

53
.4
SW
.6
53

54.0

53.2
4 53.6 53.2
SW
.6

EXISTING STORMWATER

53
54

SW

.4
SW 53.8
SW

53
.0
SW

53.4
SW

52.8
SW .4 DESIGNATION BOUNDARY
ET
54
52.4

TRE SW
52.4

52.4
52
53.2 .6

H S SW EXISTING CATCH PIT

53.8

SW
.2
54 52
.4

SW
6A UT 54
SW

O 53.6
53.6

.0

S 54
53
.2
EXISTING MANHOLE
53.4

.2
SW 53.0
53.4

55
52.8

SW INDICATIVE EXISTING CONTOURS (0.2m INTERVAL)

SW
.4
53

SW
52.8
SW

SW EXISTING CP
53.2

52.4
52.6 53.8 PROPOSED
SW 52.6

.2
52.2 53.6
52.6

53
53.2 52.6

SW
DEMOLITION BOUNDARY

SW
SW

SW
SW

52.2 53.0
53.0

53.6

SW

900Ø
52.4
SITE BARRIER WITH HOARDING ON
450ØSW

.0
54
SW

53.2
53.0
ASPHALT BUND

SW
SW

52
52.0
52.2
SW

.8
53.6

SW 53.0
54.2
DIRTY WATER DIVERSION

52.6
SW

53.0
SW CONTOUR DRAIN

SW

53.8
CP 2

54
SW
SW
.8

.0
SW
52

52.0 SW
SILT FENCE

53.4
52.4

54.4
17
51.8

S54.6W
INDICATIVE VEHICLE SW
52.0

51.8

53.8
SITE ACCESS

SW

SW

54.8
52.2
SW
WASHDOWN AREASW
SW

52.4
.6

51.8
52

52
FLOOD PRONE AREA

55.0
.8

52.8
SW PROPOSED CATCH PIT
29 CP 1

55.2
Auckland

SW
51.6

55.4
51.8
CP 3 SW SW

SW
51.6 55.6

SW
SW
SW
54
.4
FILTER CLOTH & SILT SOCK INLET
55.8

55.2
SW

52 53 56.0

54.0
53
.6 .2 56.2

.6
SW SW SW

56.4
53.8
52.0
PROTECTION

56.6
57.0
SW

56.8
52.2
52.0

52.4 57
.2
51.8

55.8
.4
53.0 57
SW

57.6
54.2
STABILISED VEHICLE ENTRANCE

57.8
SW

SW

58.0
SW

.4
SW

53
22/02/2019 2:51:40 PM

SW

SW
PROPOSED DIRECTION OFSWDEMOLITION
52.2

SW
INDICATIVE QUALITY

54.0
52.0

57.8
(INDICATIVE)
SW

55.0
TEST LOCATION SW S

SW
CANADA STREET W

54.6
SW

52.6

57.6
SW
52.4

DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE SW

54.8
52.8 SW
.2

900Ø SW
52

53.2
FLOOD PRONE AREA

57.4
SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW
SW SW

55.4

57.2
56.2
55.6
SW
52.4

SW
ORIGINAL DRAWING IN COLOUR CLIENT REV DATE REVISION DETAILS APPROVED SCALE SIZE
PRELIMINARY PROJECT
CITY RAIL LINK
A 22.02.19 PRELIMINARY ISSUE A.LINDGREN 1:250 A1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2.5 0 5 10m
DRAWN
SCALE 1:250 H.ARSHAD
APPROVED
. DATE
KARANGAHAPE ROAD - DEMOLATION WORKS
DESIGNED
TITLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
D.DELAGARZA MERCURY LANE AND EAST STREET
CHECKED PROJECT ZONE DISCIPLINE ELEMENT TYPE SHEET REVISION
DOCUMENT
T.NEL A.LINDGREN CRL KRD UTI 000 DRG 1192 A
0 20mm 40 60 80 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
ORIGINAL SIZE
 SITE BOUNDARY

SITE HOARDING AND ASPHALT BUND

AGGREGATE COMPACTED
300mm FLOW
SILT SOCK EARTH BUND
RUNOFF WATER COURSE
EXISTING SURFACE
GEOTEXTILE
N2 1O
1O

300
N2
SEDIMENT

300
N2
BUILD UP
CESSPIT GRATE CLEAN WATER DIVERSION 1O
(EXISTING OLFP) DIRTY WATER DIVERSION
CROSS SECTION
CONTOUR DRAIN (WHERE INDICATED)
(REFER TO GD05 PART E SECTION 2.3) TYPICAL SITE BOUNDARY ARRANGEMENT
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOTE:
1. LINER OR SANDBAG CHECKS TO BE USED
SILT SOCK AS NEEDED TO PREVENT ERISION IN
STEEP DIRTY WATER DIVERSIONS.

CATCHPIT PROTECTION DETAIL

(REFER TO GD05 SECTION F1.6)
NOT TO SCALE

STANDARD DETAILS FOR FABRIC JOIN

10m MIN.
3m MIN.
3m MIN.

CARRIAGEWAY
4m MIN.
pw:\\designshare.au.aurecon.info:PW_PROD_AU\Documents\Projects\23xxxx\239933 - City Rail Link CDE\01-WIP\Drawings\CRL-KRD-UTI-000-DRG-1193.dwg

3m MIN.

AGGREGATE
(50-150mm WASHED)

CARRIAGE WAY
150mm THICKNESS OR
1.5 x AGGREGATE SIZE

GEOTEXTILE
Auckland

STABILISED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT FENCE WITH RETURNS AND SUPPORT WIRE

(REFER TO GD05 PART E SECTION 2.6)

NOT TO SCALE SILT FENCE DETAIL SUPER SILT FENCE
22/02/2019 2:51:47 PM

(REFER TO GD05 PART F SECTION 1.3) (REFER TO GD05 PART F SECTION 1.4)
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE

ORIGINAL DRAWING IN COLOUR CLIENT REV DATE REVISION DETAILS APPROVED SCALE SIZE
PRELIMINARY PROJECT
CITY RAIL LINK
A 22.02.19 PRELIMINARY ISSUE A.LINDGREN AS SHOWN A1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
250 0 500 1000mm
DRAWN
SCALE 1:25 H.ARSHAD
APPROVED
. DATE
KARANGAHAPE ROAD - DEMOLATION WORKS
DESIGNED
TITLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
D.DELAGARZA GENERAL DETAILS
CHECKED PROJECT ZONE DISCIPLINE ELEMENT TYPE SHEET REVISION
DOCUMENT
T.NEL A.LINDGREN CRL KRD UTI 000 DRG 1193 A
0 20mm 40 60 80 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
ORIGINAL SIZE
Appendix B
Glossary of Terminology &
Abbreviations
The following terminology has been used throughout this City Rail Link Erosion and Sediment Control
Management Plan and are listed below for reference.

Term Description
Groundwater Water located underground in pore spaces within the soil mass
Hoarding Temporary fencing/barriers enclosing a construction site
the Project Works related to City Rail Link (CRL)
Spoil Excavated material

The following abbreviations have been used throughout this City Rail Link Erosion and Sediment
Control Management Plan and are listed below for reference.

Abbreviation Description

AEE Assessment of Environmental Effects

CRL City Rail Link project

CRLL City Rail Link Limited
CSMP Contaminated Site Management Plan
ESCP Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
GD05 Auckland Council Guideline Document for Erosion and Sediment Control
(2016)

PROJECT AREA Works Area

RMA Resource Management Act 1991

USLE Universal Sediment Loss Equation
Appendix C
ISCA Requirements
CRLL is seeking ISCA (infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia) IS (infrastructure
Sustainability) Rating for the whole project lifecycle where the requirements as per ISCA CRL IS
Technical Manual – Mahi Rauora Aratohu - Version 1.2 are essential to achieve the Project’s
sustainability goal (Reference to CRLL minimum requirements - Appendices 10, 23 and 24 of the
contract documents). This Appendix includes IS requirements that are necessary to achieve a target
level 3 of Dis-1 ISCA credits (CRLL Mandatory requirement as per Appendix 10 – Sustainability
Minimum Requirements of the contract documents). The below Table to be reviewed, amended (as
and if needed) and confirmed to meet the target level that is required. The relevant required
evidence(s) to achieve the target to be provided at appropriate timing.

ISCA Category Target Level Construction Requirements How we Aim to achieve this
Dis-1 3
Wai Ora (Receiving Water Quality)
Benchmark Section 3 of the Erosion and
Measures to minimise adverse Sediment Control
impacts to receiving wai Management Plan.
environmental values during
construction and operation have Modelling is not covered in
been identified and implemented. this Management Plan. The
These measures demonstrate an need for modelling or
awareness of the values of wai otherwise for the related
ora and its Mauri, and opportunity demolition works to be
for mana whenua feedback has reviewed once the project
been provided and where goes forward and to be
practicable incorporated into addressed accordingly prior
these measures. to work progress.

AND
Monitoring of wai discharges and
receiving wai is undertaken at
appropriate intervals and at times
of discharge during construction

AND
Monitoring and modelling of wai
discharges and receiving wai
demonstrates no adverse impact
on receiving wai environmental
values.
This page has been intentionally left blank.
Auckland Office
Level 4, Aurecon House
139 Carlton Gore Road
Auckland 1023
New Zealand
T +64 9 520 6019
F +64 524 7815