0% found this document useful (0 votes)
181 views45 pages

Montgomery County CR Zone Amendments

The document discusses proposed amendments to Montgomery County's commercial/residential zones. It provides background on the proposed changes and outlines 10 key points about the CR zones. The changes are intended to better reflect neighborhood character and scale, provide more flexibility to respond to market conditions, and increase public engagement in the development process. Examples are given comparing existing and proposed zoning in Kensington, highlighting benefits like more public review, integrated uses, and design requirements under the new CR zones.

Uploaded by

Planning Docs
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
181 views45 pages

Montgomery County CR Zone Amendments

The document discusses proposed amendments to Montgomery County's commercial/residential zones. It provides background on the proposed changes and outlines 10 key points about the CR zones. The changes are intended to better reflect neighborhood character and scale, provide more flexibility to respond to market conditions, and increase public engagement in the development process. Examples are given comparing existing and proposed zoning in Kensington, highlighting benefits like more public review, integrated uses, and design requirements under the new CR zones.

Uploaded by

Planning Docs
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

cr zone amendments

neighborhood | scale | transition | economics

montgomery county planning dept Title national here marylandgoes capital park & planning

june 13, 2011 corrections and citations requested by committee noted in red & underlined 1

presentation
background overview of the changes 10 points about CR application of the zones

background

proposed zta

council passed the cr zone a year ago work on wheaton | takoma | kensington master plans lead to discussions on fine graining the zone better reflect neighborhood character & scale proposed zta reflects the board thinking

planning board discussions

focus on neighborhood transition | scale | public role zoning reflects the scale | intensity of different neighborhoods much better results for the public & their role in future site plans

overview

proposed zta
flexibility to respond to local | current market conditions added neighborhood protections appropriate requirements for small | low density lots

proposed zta - many advantages over the current commercial zones site plan requirement - increased public engagement (vs c1 & c2) added certainty - density | height (vs cbd, tmx, etc) better transitions - commercial uses | density | height near residential setbacks from adjacent residential currently not required

3 pending master plans use the CR subgroups wheaton | takoma - langley | kensington
currently exploring in ongoing master plans long branch | east county science | chevy chase lake | burtonsville will also be studied in upcoming master plans white flint II | glenmont | montgomery village

proposed cr zone subgroups (59-C-15.11(a))


CRN CRT CR neighborhood town metro - new - new - general amendments

10

continues the CR approach (59-C-15.11(b)) regulates - use | maximum density | maximum height CRN 1.0 C 0.5 R 1.0 H 40

CRT 2.0 C 1.0 R 1.5 H 65 CR 4.0 C 1.0 R 3.5 H 150 sectional map amendment applies zones & establishes certainty (59-C-15.11(c))

11

CRN - neighborhood transition between residential areas & the commercial center uses focus on neighborhood services site plan review now required at low thresholds limited uses | higher parking | no blt required restricted density | height range - possibly below the maximum

12

CRT - town center


mixed-use town centers | edges housing | commercial diversity to achieve CR zone objectives design and review oversight to ensure public review limited uses | medium parking requirements | no blt requirement sketch plan option over 1.0 far to enhance public realm moderate density & height range

13

CR - metro
current CR zone now metro focused | urban edges changes to the current zone points system lower standard method for more discussions on benefits payment into the amenity fund current sketch plans may at site plan choose the amenity fund

14

density range of the CR groups (59-C-15.121(a))

crn
0.5 to 1.5 far
full build-out of r-60 house = 0.875 far

crt
0.5 to 4.0 far

cr
0.5 to 8.0 far

0.5 far

15

height range of the CR groups (59-C-15.121(a))

crn
40 to 65 feet
max height of r-60 house = 35 (average along slope)

crt
40 to 150 feet

cr
40 to 300 feet
max height of r-200 house = 50 (average along slope)

40

16

10 points about CR

17

point 1 - zones will be used to rezone neighborhoods (see pending master plan zoning recommendations)
no - apply to commercial areas may be small changes by master plan recommendation ex - small R-60 lots currently used for commercial parking

18

point 2 - proposal allows 65 in all crn; 150 in all crt


height is determined by mapped zone approved by council (59-C15.13) available range allows for flexibility in planning (59-C-15.11(c), 15.121) application of height is determined through public process pending master plans recommend heights at 45 maximum (see pending master plan maps)

19

point 3 - parking requirement is too low


in line with dot | mncppc parking study for mixed use areas (see parking study*) requirements at or greater than industry standards some maximum limits have been removed (59-C-15.631) input of town council | residents higher transit access reflected in parking standards for CRN, CRT, and CR zones (59-C-15.631)

*[Link] 20

point 4 - no noticing of applications


CR sketch plan process requires noticing presubmittal sketch plans - posting on site site plans - posting on site (see development review manual*) mailing to adjacent property owners | civic groups hearing posted on web documents available on line ([Link]/development/finder) more noticing is required under the CR subgroups (59-C-15.41(c), 15.634)

*[Link] 21

point 5 - no public participation in review


all sketch plan & site plans require pre-submittal meetings (see development review manual, op cit) testimony is heard on all sketch | site plan applications more public review in kensington | takoma | wheaton * site plan will apply to more lots with lower thresholds (59-C15.41(c), 15.634) 10,000sf or more limited use 10 units or more >40 height drive-through service window

no hearing required for most c-1, c-2, and standard method cbd-zoned projects 22

point 6 - zone supersedes master plans


zones are implemented through the master plan (59-C-15.13) sketch | site plans must conform to master plan (59-C-15.43(c)(2), 15.61) most current commercial zones do not require master plan conformity (c-1, c-2, cbd standard method)

23

point 7 - no amenities will be required


standard method projects have requirements street orientation (59-C-15.633) parking to the side or rear (59-C-15.633) open space on appropriate lots (59-C-15.73) site plans require master plan conformance (59-C-15.61) sketch plans require public benefits at specified thresholds (59-C15.41(b)) flexibility to raise funding for larger public facilities through amenity fund (59-C-15.851(c))

24

point 8 - development is by right in CRN | CRT zones


building permits may be issued if the use is permitted not more than 10 units not more than 10,000sf no drive-through service not more than 40 high (59-C-15.41(c)) by right development must meet development stds | requirements (59-C-15.6, 15.7) other development requires site plan | sketch plan full public noticing and review (see development review manual, op cit)

25

point 9 - zoning rewrite project will nullify work on cr zones


proposed CR sub groups are consistent with current rewrite work use | density | height limits list of public benefits current rewrite drafting is pending on the zta before the Council there may be modifications through the rewrite public process

26

point 10 - sketch plan elements can only be changed by applicant and planning board is stripped of authority (proposed 59-C-15.43(d))
changes may come from applicant | staff | planning board | public planning board would arbitrate through public review - any changes clearer planning bd. authority than under current law

27

application

28

f d b

f
on the ground: density & height in kensington

f
e d e b d f g a c d e e h
category max far max height

a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h.

crt crt crt crt crn crn crt crt

2.5 h 75 2.0 h 60 2.0 h 50 1.5 h 60 1.5 h 45 1.0 h 45 2.5 h 60 1.5 h 45

h
29

on the ground: public review in kensington existing site plan is required only on o-m, c-o, & c-t zoned properties; no public review of most commercial projects
no existing public review process

proposed site plan will be required on almost all crn & crt zoned properties replacing all o-m, c-o, c-t, c-1, & c-2 zoned properties

30

example - kensington
c2 zone crn zone

31

kensington c2 zone crn zone

32

Kensington - results

less surface parking lower height incentives for green building, etc. more public review - site plan requirement pedestrian-friendly streets open space or other amenities

33

example - kensington

amenity requirements: above 1 far

34

example kensington
permitted density - 2.5 base density - 0.5 far

35

example - kensington
transit proximity (59-C-15.852; lower in crt than cr marc vs. metro (59-C-15.631))

36

example - kensington
affordable housing (59-C-15.854(a))

37

example - kensington
unit mix (59-C-15.854(e); 1, 2, 3+ bdrm req.)

38

example - kensington
structured and/or public parking (59-C-855(b), 15.853(d))

39

example - kensington
energy efficiency (59-C-15.856(b))

40

example - kensington
green roof (59-C-15.856(f))

41

kensington - result

site plan review integrated mix of uses - lower vmt civic-oriented standards & design requirements

42

white flint - as built

successful transition of the whole foods not possible in all the subgroups

43

wrapup

44

conclusion

planning bd. supports the recommended zta it is the sound evolution of the CR family of zones results of hours of public discussion will create more opportunity for public review work on master plans highlights the flexibility accommodate neighborhood character better identify appropriate transitions

45

Common questions

Powered by AI

The proposed CR zoning encourages sustainable urban development by incorporating several environmentally friendly features and incentives. For example, the zones support green building practices and offer incentives for sustainable design elements like green roofs and energy efficiency . Furthermore, the requirement for open space on appropriate lots and pedestrian-friendly street design standards fosters a more sustainable and livable urban environment . These measures aim to reduce environmental impact and promote long-term sustainability in urban growth.

The CR zoning addresses affordable housing by integrating requirements and incentives for a mix of housing types, including affordable units, into its planning framework. For example, in Kensington, CR zones necessitate a mix of unit types to include affordable options, and they emphasize proximity to public transit, which can reduce living costs associated with transportation . This approach helps to ensure that a range of affordable housing options are available within new developments, addressing housing concerns in urban planning .

The CR zone approach is designed to integrate with and potentially supersede existing master plans. While zones are implemented through the master plan and must conform to it, the CR zone offers greater flexibility to modify various zoning aspects, such as use, density, and height limits, to better accommodate neighborhood character and current market conditions . By offering this flexibility, the CR zone can adapt more readily to new developments, ensuring that planning goals remain aligned with community needs even as they evolve .

The amenity fund plays a critical role in the context of CR zones by providing flexibility for funding larger public facilities. Developers may opt to contribute to the amenity fund instead of providing specific on-site benefits, becoming part of the planning discussions at the site plan stage . This system allows for pooling resources to develop substantial communal amenities and supports a more strategic distribution of public benefit projects throughout the community .

The proposed CR zones maintain neighborhood character and scale by implementing zoning regulations that reflect the scale and intensity of different neighborhoods, facilitating better transitions between residential and commercial areas . The CRN zones specifically provide a transition between residential areas and commercial centers by focusing on neighborhood services and setting limits on site plan reviews and the types of uses allowed, with restricted density and height ranges . These elements help in retaining the neighborhood's unique identity amidst new developments.

The proposed CRN, CRT, and CR zones differ in their maximum height regulations as follows: CRN zones range from 40 to 65 feet, CRT zones from 40 to 150 feet, and CR zones from 40 to 300 feet . This range allows for flexibility in planning and application of height is determined through a public process .

'By right' development in the CRN and CRT zones is subject to specific limitations: it must not exceed 10 units or 10,000 square feet, cannot have drive-through services, and must not exceed 40 feet in height . These developments must meet standard development requirements and do not require additional site or sketch plan reviews unless exceeding these thresholds .

The new CR zones offer several advantages over current commercial zones. Firstly, they increase public engagement by requiring site plan review at lower thresholds compared to C1 and C2 zones . Secondly, they provide greater certainty regarding density and height compared to CBD and TMX zones, offering better transitions in terms of commercial use, density, and height near residential areas . Moreover, the new CR zones introduce neighborhood protections and are designed to be more flexible in responding to local and current market conditions, making them more suitable for small and low-density lots .

The new planning approach under the CR zones encourages public participation by requiring more comprehensive public review and engagement. All sketch and site plans necessitate pre-submittal meetings where testimony is heard, particularly in areas like Kensington, Takoma, and Wheaton . Additionally, notifications are required for applications, involving posting on sites and online, as well as mailing to adjacent property owners and civic groups . This participatory requirement ensures that public voices are considered in the planning process.

The new CR zoning approach handles transitions between different land uses by better reflecting neighborhood character through zoning that matches the intensity and scale of different neighborhoods . It enables better transitions in terms of commercial uses, density, and height near residential areas, providing appropriate setbacks and eliminating the requirement for such transitions in some current zones . This transition mechanism ensures that developments are harmoniously integrated within existing urban fabrics without abrupt changes in land use intensity.

You might also like