See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/335292399

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF FOUNDATION FOR G+5 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Article · June 2019

CITATIONS READS

0 2,899

5 authors, including:

Vedprakash Maralapalle
Anjuman-I-Islam's Kalsekar Technical Campus
7 PUBLICATIONS   7 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Experimental Investigation on skin friction of Pile View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Vedprakash Maralapalle on 06 October 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 [Link] (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF FOUNDATION FOR

G+5 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
1
Vedprakash Maralapalle, 2 Momin Muntazir, 3Akbani Abdul Aahad, 4Kazi Mubariz, 5Bagwan Sakib
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, AIKTC, Panvel, India,
2,3,4,5
UG Students, Department of Civil Engineering, AIKTC, Panvel, India

Abstract: This paper shows the analysis and design of Shallow Foundation for G+5 residential building. In the present study the
foundation is an important part of the structure. Isolated Footing is one of the most important types of Shallow foundations. In order to
design them, it's necessary to first acquire the plan of the particular building that is, a positioning of the particular rooms such they serve
their individual purpose and also suited to the requirements and comfort to the inhabitants. This paper shows the G+5 residential building
at Panvel, Maharahtra, India for which a foundation is be suggested and design for building. foundation analysis and design are explained
in this paper.
Index Terms – Foundation, structure, Load, design, analysis

I. INTRODUCTION:

The support for any structure is provided by underlying soil material and therefore, the stability of the structure depends on it. A foundation
is supposed to transmit the structural loading to the supporting soil in such a way that the soil is not overstressed and that serious
settlements of the structure are not caused. The type of foundation utilised is closely related to the properties of the supporting soil, since
the performance of the foundation is based on that of the soil in addition to its own. Thus, it is important to recognise that it is the soil-
foundation system that provides support for the structure; the components of this system should not be viewed separately. The foundation
is an element that is built and installed, while the soil is the natural earth material which exists at the site.

Since the stability of structure is dependent upon the soil foundation system, all forces that may acts on the structure during its
lifetime should be considered. In fact, it is the worst combination of these must be considered for design. Typically, foundation design
always includes the effect of that load plus the live loads on the structures. Other miscellaneous forces that may have to be considered
result from the action of wind, water, heat, ice, frost, earthquake and explosive blasts. This paper shows the G+5 residential building at
Panvel, India for which a foundation is be suggested and design foundation for the building, and land was found in Sandy soil as per soil
investigation report SBC for site is 300 kN/m2 and recommendation of shallow i.e. isolated footing is enough to counteract the building
load. So isolated footing foundation design is to be design for that structure and designed details and design approach explain in this
paper.

II. SITE DETAILS:

The construction site is at Panvel, India. we have designed the isolated footing for G + 5 residential building.
Using Etabs 2016 software complete G+ 5 building analyzed and designs are carried out and axial load coming to the column are taken
from Etabs software which is mention below in table 2.

IJRAR19K3940 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)[Link] 596

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 [Link] (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Table 1: structural detail of g+20 building

Item Slab Beam Column

Dimensions 150 mm 230x600mm 230x450mm

Grade of concrete M25 M30 M30

Steel Grade
Floor to Floor height Fe415 Fe500 Fe500

230 mm thick
Shear wall

Staircase slab 200mm

No. of Columns 29

fig 1 : layout of G+5 residential building.

IJRAR19K3940 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)[Link] 597

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 [Link] (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Fig 2 : centre line plan of beam & column. (used in etabs)

III. LOAD CALUCLATIONS:

Using Etabs 2016 above G+ 5 structures complete analysed and Design, As per I.S-465:2000 Norms. In Etabs all the beams are assigned
as 230x600mm with M30 grade of concrete & column assigned as 230x450mm with M30 grade of concrete and Fe500 steel grade &
slab assigned as 150mm thickness overall with M25 grade of concrete. In staircase 200mm overall thick slab provided. Appropriate or
maximum loading assigned to the structure as I.S-456:2000. From Etabs via load transfer mechanism take an Axial loads coming column
and Design respective foundation for the structure.

Table 2: axial loads on column using etabs

Column Axial Loads (kN) Column Axial Loads (kN)

C-1 1220 C-16 2095
C-2 1108 C-17 2259
C-3 1287 C-18 1587
C-4 1185 C-19 1584
C-5 1434 C-20 1576
C-6 2122 C-21 1748
C-7 1868 C-22 1592
C-8 927 C-23 1530
C-9 1275 C-24 1762
C-10 1177 C-25 1598
C-11 1206 C-26 1591
C-12 736 C-27 1584
C-13 2044 C-28 2248
C-14 1981 C-29 2342
C-15 1235

Above table or loads to make a combination of two or more load for which designed foundation for the structure. In some situation it is
possible to provide a uniform foundation i.e. providing a uniform footing sizes for all columns under one maximum load or either provides
two or more different sizes of footing by arranging the loads combinations. In our case provided two different size of isolated footing for
two different maximum loads from table 2.

IJRAR19K3940 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)[Link] 598

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 [Link] (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Table 3: load combination for foundation design.

Column No Axial Load Column No Axial Load

C-1, C-3, C-5, C-6, C-2
C-8, C-10, C-15, C- Total Numbers of C-4
22, C-25, C-26, C- Column= 20 C-7 Total Numbers of
27, C-28, C-29, C- Column = 9
C-12
9, C-11, C-14, C- Range: Design For
16, C-19, C-20, C- 500 TO 1500kN C-13 Maximum Load
23. C-17 =2500kN
Design For C-18
Maximum Load C-21
=1500kN C-24

IV. DESIGN OF ISOLATED FOOTING

The decision of isolated footing foundation has been taken on the basis of types of soil available. Since, the soil present at the site has
enough bearing capacity; the decision of isolated footing foundation has been taken. Since the load on the column is enough to counteract
SBC without excessive settlement, therefore the isolated footing are proposed. Designed methodology for isolated footing foundation is
explained as per IS456-2000.

a) Forces Details:
Axial Load = P1 = 1666.67kN
Column and Footing Details:
Length = (Larger Dimension of Column) = 450mm
Width = (Smaller Dimension of Column) = 230mm
1100
Area of Footing Required = = 2.37m
464

Round it off Sides of Footing = 2.4m

Provide Sides of Footing = 2.4x2.4m
Area of Footing Provided = 5.76m
Length = L = 2.4, Width = B = 2.4m, Depth = 0.55m
Cover to Main R/f = 50mm
Diameter of R/f in Footing = 12mm
Material Constant:
Concrete Grade = M25, R/f Grade = 415MPa
Load factor = 1.5
b) Design Forces:
Axial load = P = 1666.67kN
Self weight of footing = 166.67
Total vertical load =1833.33kN
Ultimate vertical load = 2500 kN
Pressure Calculation:
SBC = 464 kN/m2
2500
Upward soil pressure = = 260.42 kN/m2
2.4𝑥2.4

c) Reinforcement Calculation from BM Consideration:

Moment at Critical Section along Width:
1.085𝑥1.085
Mu = 260.4x
2

Mu = 153.28 kN.m
IJRAR19K3940 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)[Link] 599
© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 [Link] (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Ast = 874.90 mm2

Minimun Ast = 660mm2 (Astmin= 0.12%bD)
Providing 12mm @ 125mm c/c along width
Moment at Critical Section along Length :
0.975𝑥0.975
Mu = 260.4x
2

Mu = 123.78 kN.m
Ast = 703 mm2
Minimun Ast = 660mm2 (Astmin= 0.12%bD)
Providing 12mm @ 160mm c/c along length.
Check For One Way Shear Along Length:
Critical Section is at distanceof d ' from face of column
Shear force at critical section = 260.4 x 0.475
Vu = 123.70kN
123.70𝑥10^3
τv =
1000𝑥500
100𝑥𝐴𝑠 1000𝑥702.38
Pt% = = = 0.14
𝑏𝑥𝑑 1000𝑥500

τc =0.28N/mm2
τv less than τc hence footing is safe in one-way shear criteria.
Check For One Way Shear Along Width:
Critical Section is at distancedfrom face of column
Shear force at critical section (Vu) = 260.42 x 0.585 = 152.34kN
152.34𝑥10^3
τv = = 0.305 N/mm2
1000𝑥500
100𝑥𝐴𝑠 1000𝑥874.92
Pt% = = = 0.17
𝑏𝑥𝑑 1000𝑥500

τc =0.28N/mm2
τv less than τc hence footing is safe in one-way shear criteria.
Check For Two Way Shear:
Critical Section is at distance of’d/2' from face of column
Shear force at Critical Section = 260.42 x area of shaded portion
Vu = 260.42 x 5.0665
= 1319.40 kN
Critical Perimeter = 2 x 0.95 + 2 x 0.73 = 3.36m
1319.40𝑥10^3
τv = = 0.785 N/mm2
3360𝑥500

Allowable Shear stress = ksx τc ( CLAUSE 31.3.3 IS 456 : 2000 )

Where, ks= (0.5+β)
β= Short Side of Column =0.23 & Long Side of Column =0.45
0.23
β= = 0.51
0.45

ks = 0.5+0.51 = 1.01 but it should not be greater than 1

Therefore adopt ks = 1
Where,
τc = 0.25x√fck= 1.25 N/mm2
Comparing τv and ksx τc, hence footing is safe in two way shear criteria.

IJRAR19K3940 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)[Link] 600

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 [Link] (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Table 4: Detailed of isolated footing

Column Size of Size of footing Depth of footing Load on Dia of bar & Dia of bar &
column (meter) footing Spacing along Spacing along
(mm) length Width provided
provided
For all 29
column 550mm overall 12mm ϕ @
uniform size 230x450 2.4x2.4x0.55 depth of footing 2500 kN 12mmϕ @ 125mmc/c
of footing is 160mm c/c
provided

V. CONCLUSION:
In this study, analysis and design of Isolated footings were carried out. The conclusions drawn from this study can be summarized as
follows.
The soil is tested and it has been observed that, the site is with sandy soil. The bearing capacity of the soil has been found to be good and
the SBC is enough to resist it, hence isolated footing foundations has been proposed for the site. After analyzing the structure calculated
Size for the column is 230 x 450mm, Size of footing is 2.4 x 2.4 x 0.55m, Maximum load coming on footing is 2500kN and Maximum
diameter of bar for footing 12mmϕ @125 mm center to center.

REFRENCES:

[1] Arora, K.R (2003), Soil mechanics and foundation Engineering, standard publishers Distributors New Delhi.
[2] B.C. Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain. “Soil Mechanics and Foundations”
[3] P. C. Varghese “Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design”
[4] [Link] & [Link] “Illustrated Design of Reinforced Concrete”
[5] Subhash Chander “Geotechnical & Foundation Engineering”
[6] IS 2720 (Part V-1970), Indian standard method of test for soil.
[7] IS 2720: Part 2: 1973 method of test for soil: Part 2 Determination of water content.

IJRAR19K3940
View publication stats
International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)[Link] 601