Kingsbury 1997
Kingsbury 1997
To cite this article: Steven J. Kingsbury, Michael T. Lambert & William Hendrickse (1997) A Two-
Factor Model of Aggression, Psychiatry, 60:3, 224-232, DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1997.11024800
Article views: 7
Download by: [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] Date: 08 August 2017, At: 07:41
~~-~--------~----~-- ~------~--~---------~~---------~--~----------~------~-~----------,
research and theory are reviewed, focusing on two important behavioral mod-
els of aggressive behavior, hostile aggression and instrumental aggression. The
concepts of reinforcement, anticipated rewards, specific and nonspecific stimu-
lus-driven aggression, intermediary emotional states in aroused persons, and
the aggression stimulus threshold are developed into a bimodal model applica-
ble to the clinical management of violence. The model provides a broad frame-
work for categorizing, understanding, and addressing aggressive behavior in
clinical settings.
Violence is a major public health con- tors attempting to cover all instances of
cern in our country and is particularly rel- violence (Crain 1979a, Crain 1979b; Dubin
evant in the specialty of psychiatry, 1981; Eichelman 1988; Monopolis and
where understanding the causes of vio- Lion 1985; O'Shanick 1984; Rada 1981;
lence and the management of aggressive Slaby 1994). These approaches are valu-
behavior is critical. Although violence able, but they minimize organizing princi-
may not be more common in psychiatric ples and may create overly broad formulas
atients than the general population, ag- for developing interventions. These dis-
gresslOn IS a pro em m many psyc la rIc cusslons al 0 a ess e un er ymg 1-
settings where the risk of patient-on-staff mensions of different types of violent be-
assault is well documented (Hatti et al. haviors.
1982; Madden et al. 1976; Thackrey and We present a two-factor model of ag-
Bobbit 1990). gression developed from psychological
Practical suggestions for the pharmaco- theory and research. The model can help
logical and psychosocial management of clinicians categorize and understand the
violence and aggression exist, but there is determinants and potential management
surprisingly little discussion in the psy- strategies employed to control aggressive
chiatric literature of principles or theory. behaviors. Mental health clinicians, edu-
Strategies are categorized by diagnosis or cators, and researchers contending with
by listing multiple possible etiological fac- the problem of aggression need a frame-
Steven J. Kingsbury, MD, PhD. is a staff psychiatrist/psychologist at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medi-
cal Center and Assistant Professor in the Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology at the University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. TX.
Michael T. Lambert, MD. is Medical Director of the Mental Health Service at the Dallas Veterans Af-
fairs Medical Center and Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. TX.
William Hendrickse, MD. is a staff psychiatrist at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Assis-
tant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at
Dallas. TX.
Address correspondence to: Steven J. Kingsbury. M.D .• Ph.D .• Dallas VAMC. U6A. 4500 South Lan-
caster Ave .• Dallas. TX 75216.
work for discussion. This paradigm com- son ai, social, and biological components
pliments existing biological, psychologi- of aggression. Freud conceptualized ag-
cal, and sociological research of violence, gression and libido as the basic drive
without minimizing the importance of states (Freud 1920/1959, Stepansky 1977).
specific diagnoses or other psychiatric for- Hull emphasized operationalizing concepts
mulations that explain or intervene in ag- and systematic research of the compo-
gression. nents of aggressive drive (Dollard et al.
1939), leading to revisions of the drive for-
mulation (Berkowitz 1969) that stimu-
DEFINITIONS AND BACKGROUND lated the development of alternative mod-
els not based on drive theory (Bandura
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
Most modern definitions of aggression 1973; Baron 1977; Buss 1961; Tedeschi et
contain several elements. First, aggres- al. 1974). The two behavioral psychology
sion is conceptualized as overtly destruc- paradigms we will develop into our bi-
tive behavior. Therefore, a thought or modal model evolved from the work of so-
dream with aggressive content would not cial psychologists.
be considered aggression. Second, the Models appeared from other traditions,
goal, intent, or purpose of the behavior is such as the ethological (Lorenz 1969), the
to cause injury or harm to another living sociological (Toch 1969), and the biologi-
being (Baron 1977; Berkowitz 1962; Dol- cal (Moyer 1981; Volavka 1995). Several
lard et al. 1939). Behavior that acciden- extensive reviews of aggression theory
tally causes harm is not considered ag- are available (Baron and Richardson 1994;
gression. Similarly, assertive behavior, Buss 1961; Felson and Tedeschi 1993;
such as presenting one's position, is not Huesmann 1994). Unfortunately, cross-
categorized as aggression (Bandura 1973). fertilization of thought between schools
Some definitions stipulate that aggres- has been sporadic, and each of the models
sion must be behavior that is not socially has developed its own classification
sanctioned, whereas other definitions in- system.
clude destruction of property, if the intent Although aggression models have been
is to affect the owner (Bandura 1973; Zill- applied to many problems, such as the ef- ;
-,----
I mann 1979). Using these defiiiitlo"ns, exe- fects of television violence (Geen 1976; ~"
I cuting a convicted murderer would not be Feshbach and Singer 1971), and racial '
aggression, but destroying a rival's impor- violence (Donnerstein and Donnerstein
tant papers would be. 1976), there has been little direct applica-
We use the definition of aggression as tion to clinical problems in psychiatry. We
"behavior directed toward the goal of har- start with an overview and synthesis of
ming or injuring another living being who concepts that we will develop into a prac-
is motivated to avoid such treatment" tical two-factor model intended for use in
(Baron 1977, p. 7). The term aggression is the clinical consideration of aggression.
commonly used in psychology studies,
whereas the term violence is frequently
used in the psychiatric literature. We will Two AGGRESSION MODELS FROM
use the terms synonomously here. Trau- SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
matization and victimization, which refer
to the sequellae of aggression, and sui- Aggression is typically discussed in two
cidal and self-destructive behaviors will forms, instrumental aggression and hos-
not be discussed in this article. tile aggression (Aronson 1992). These two
Aggression research and related theo- types of aggression are often studied in
retical work have evolved from an initial pure form (Baron and Richardson 1994),
focus on aggression as an innate drive but most discussions acknowledge that
state to more behaviorally oriented learn- many displays of aggression have ele-
ing models that recognize reinforcers and ments of both types. Any discussion of ag-
cues, as well as the contextual, interper- gression needs to account for both forms
as well as the interaction of the two forms jects, and Park et al. (1972) found that so-
of aggression. Zillmann (1979) described cial reinforcement of verbal aggression
instrumental aggression as incentive- subsequently generalized to greater phys-
motivated behavior and hostile aggres- ical aggression in the form of shocks ad-
sion as annoyance-motivated behavior. ministered. Social reinforcement of aggres-
sion occurs in mob and gang situations,
but it can also be operational in the milieu
Instrumental Aggression
of some psychiatric treatment settings.
Instrumental aggression is best under- A deficit in the ability to experience or
stood by the principles of operant con- anticipate remorse or the aversive out-
ditioning, where the probability of ag- comes that come as a consequence of
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
inflicting pain may be positively reinforc- ior. The attack some battered women
ing (Bandura 1973; Eron 1994). Moyer make on abusive mates after years of en-
(1983) postulated aggression-modulating trapment (the "burning bed syndrome")
brain neural systems that fire in the pres- (Megargee 1966) exemplifies this, but for
ence of certain stimuli, resulting in hostile some individuals :relatively low levels of
feelings and aggressive behavior. Exam- stimulation may result in frustration and
ples of hostile aggression include un- aggression depending on how it is inter-
planned crimes of passion (such as assault preted (Zillmann 1988).
after an insult) and aggression in manic, Provocative insults or personal attacks
stimulant-intoxicated, or other psychotic act as powerful interpersonal cues that in-
patients, especially after perceived slights crease the chance of hostile aggression
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
ior, all violence involves elements of in- euphoria associated with patients being
strumental aggression, hostile aggres- medicated with benzodiazepines ordered
sion, or some combination of both. This "pm for agitation." The aggressive out-
provides a framework for thinking about bursts stop when the medication is changed
the determinants of violence, allowing the to a less pleasurable (rewarding) agent or is
task of understanding causes and inter- given in regularly scheduled doses (remov-
ventions to be rational and systematic. ing the contingent relationship of the be-
In psychiatric situations that may even- havior and the reinfocement).
tuate in aggression, the clinician should Persons with personality disorders of-
determine how violent behavior previous- ten fail to consider the negative effects of
ly led to some expected or real reinforce- aggression, focusing instead on the antici-
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
ment. This is true whether the patient is pated rewards of instrumental aggressive
intoxicated, paranoid, antisocial, or af- behavior. An important component of sup-
fected by other transitory or enduring portive psychotherapy with such individ-
states. The clinician must also attend to uals is helping the patient to anticipate
factors that increase the patient's general the full range of consequences of behav-
arousal level, leading to the patient's ex- iors, hopefully to more appropriate choices.
periencing the situation as provoking or
frustrating, and be sensitive to cues that
might precipitate violent behavior. Clinical Vignette: Management of
Attention to the same two factors are Instrumental Aggression
necessary when treating aggressive indi- Mr. B is a 43-year-old white male with
viduals. Interventions may be grouped chronic, treatment refractory paranoid
into those interventions that decrease the schizophrenia and a long history of ag-
associated rewards for acting aggres- gressive and intimidating behavior. Hav-
sively and those that decrease the pa- ing spent years in and out of inpatient
tient's level of arousal, anger, and frustra- facilities, he was entered into an intensive
tion. As mentioned above, this does not case management program designed to
replace the need to systematically diag- both aid his transition back into the com-
nose the determin~ts of aggre~sion. How- munity and minimize hospitalization. He
ever, by keeping in mind these factors, the tenuou8ryaaapted to community livmg~~-·---~
clinician is able to group causes of vio- and frequently tried to return to the hospi-
lence as to whether reinfocement, arousal! tal. He found the inpatient unit to be ex-
anger, or both are operative. Further dis- tremely rewarding because of the attention
cussion will illustrate the value of this or- from nursing staff, food, and the social con-
ganizational schema. tact from staff and other patients.
During a visit with his social worker
case manager, Mr. B requested hospital-
Clinical Implications of ization. When the social worker tried to
Instrumental Aggression explore his reasons, he deliberately ap-
Managing instrumental aggression de- proached her and struck her in the face
pends on understanding the reinforcers and ribs. As she ran out of the room to get
that have been associated with aggressive help, Mr. B calmly remained behind in the
behavior, including consequences the per- examining room. When help came, Mr. B
petrator expects from the hostile act. Re- quietly held out his arms to receive an in-
moving reinforcement and changing the jection and willingly walked with multiple
expectation of rewards decrease the ex- escorts to an inpatient seclusion room. He
pression of instrumental aggression. did not require restraints and had no ag-
In clinical settings, instrumental fac- gressive episodes during this hospitaliza-
tors can play an important role in aggres- tion. He was calm throughout the episode,
sive behavior. For example, on inpatient and his admitting urine toxicology screen
units we see aggression reinforced by the was negative for any drugs of abuse.
The social worker was unhurt but dis- crease arousal and the application of in-
turbed by what she perceived as her in- terventions that reduce arousal or which
ability to have predicted the attack. She raise the threshold of responding aggres-
stated that Mr. B had not seemed upset, sively to arousing stimuli. As mentioned
angry, or unusually animated. He seemed above, a number of acute and chronic psy-
to attack calmly and then stop, which she chiatric conditions are marked by ex-
felt was unlike her experience in emer- treme stimulation. Alcohol withdrawal,
gency settings. Later, the patient stated stimulant intoxication, mania, psychosis,
that he had not felt angry at the social and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
worker. are frequently accompanied by arousal de-
This incident is usefully conceptualized rived from the illness itself. Some individ-
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
KINGSBURY ET AL.
sive agents that may affect the stimulus large right adrenal medulla tumor, a pheo-
threshold. The antiaggressive effect is not chromocytoma, was found and soon re-
immediate, as seen in medications that are sected.
decreasing stimulation acutely, but ap- The crescendo of arousal episodes and
pears gradually over a period of days or aggressive behavior dramatically ceased
weeks. after the surgery. The arousal from the
Psychosocial interventions such as ag- epinephrine released by the tumor had
gression management training, behavior clearly been facilitating aggression when
modification, and supportive psychother- coupled with the stimulation provided by
apy can be conceptualized as attempts to the intrusive component of the PTSD. The
raise the threshold at which stimulation patient's vulnerability to arousal"based
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
I
AGGRESSION
well as for teaching about the causes and 1987). This model could improve commu-
the management of violence in the clinical nication between disciplines when dis-
setting. cussing the pragmatic application of ag-
In their training, the various mental gression theory to clinical situations,
health disciplines emphasize different providing clinicians, educators, and ad-
conceptual models regarding a number of ministrators a framework from which to
issues, including violence, and tend to discuss causes of violence and interven-
speak separate languages (Kingsbury tions to manage aggressive behaviors.
REFERENCES
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017
ARONSON, E. The Social Animal, 6th ed. New York: Geen and E. C. O'Neal, eds., Perspectives on Ag-
W. H. Freeman, 1992. gression (pp. 133-168). Academic Press, 1976.
BANDURA, A. Aggression: A Social Learning Analy- DONNERSTEIN, E., and WILSON, D. W. The effects
sis. Prentice-Hall, 1973. of noise and perceived control upon ongoing and
BANDURA, A. Social Learning Theory. Prentice- subsequent aggressive behavior. Journal of Per-
Hall, 1977. sonality and Social Psychology (1976) 34:774-81.
BARON. R. A. Human Aggression. Plenum, 1977. DOOB, A. N., and KIRSHENBAUM, H. M. The effects
BARON, R. A., and BELL, P. A. Aggression and heat: on arousal of frustration and aggressive films.
Mediating effects of prior provocation and expo- Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology
sure to an aggressive model. Journal ofPersonality (1973) 9:57-64.
and Social Psychology (1975) 31:825-32. DUBIN, W. R. Evaluating and managing the violent
BARON, R. A., and RICHARDSON, D. R. Human Ag- patient. Annals of Emergency Medicine (1981) 10:
gression, 2nd ed. Plenum, 1994. 481-4.
BERKOWITZ, L. Aggression: A Social Psychological EICHELMAN, B. Towards a rational pharmacother-
Analysis. McGraw-Hill, 1962. apy for aggressive and violent behavior. Hospital
BERKOWITZ, L. The frustration-aggression hypothe- and Community Psychiatry (1988) 39:31-8.
sis revisited. In L. Berkowitz, ed., Roots of ERON, L. D. Theories of aggression: From drives
Aggression: A Re-examination of the Frustra- to cognitions. In L. R. Huesmann, ed., Aggres-
tion-Aggression Hypothesis (pp. 1-28). Atherton, sive Behavior: Current Perspectives (pp. 3-11).
1969. Plenum, 1994.
BERKOWITZ, L. Frustrations, appraisals, and aver- FELSON, R. B., and TEDESCHI, J. T., [Link]
sively stimulated aggression. Aggressive Behav- and Violence: Social Interactionist Perspectives.~__~_~,~
--~io-rnmm' 14:3-1C American Psychological Association, 1993.
BERKOWITZ, L. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: FESHBACH, S. Nationalism, patriotism, and aggres-
Examination and reformulation. Psychological sion: A clarification of functional differences. In L.
Bulletin (1989) 106:59-73. R. Huesmamm, ed., Aggressive Behavior: Current
BERKOWITZ, L. Is something missing? Some ob- Perspectives (pp. 275-291). Plenum, 1994.
servations prompted by the cognitive-neoas- FESHBACH, S., and SINGER, R. D. Television and
sociasionist view of anger and aggression. In L. R. Aggression. Jossey-Bass, 1971.
Huesmann, ed., Aggressive Behavior: Current Per- FREUD, S. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Bantam,
spectives (pp. 35-37). Plenum, 1994. 1920/1959.
BERKOWITZ, L., and LEPAGE, A. Weapons as ag- GEEN, R. G. Observing violence in the mass media:
gression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality Implications of basic research. In R. G. Geen and
and Social Psychology (1967) 7:202-207. E. C. O'Neal, eds., Perspectives on Aggression (pp.
Buss, A. H. The Psychology of Aggression. Wiley, 193-234). Academic Press, 1976.
1961. GEEN, R. G., and BERKOWITZ, L. Name-mediated
CRAIN, P. M. Clinical approaches to assaultive be- cue properties. Journal of Personality (1966) 34:
havior I: Evaluation. Psychiatric Journal of the 456-465.
University of Ottawa (1979a) 4:224-8. GEEN, R. G., and McCOWN, E. J. Effects of noise
CRAIN, P. M. Clinical approaches to assaultive be- and attack on aggression and physiologi-
havior II: A psychodynamic framework. Psychiat- cal arousal. Motivation and Emotion (1984) 8:
ric Journal of the University of Ottawa (l979b) 4: 231-41.
229-32. GEEN, R. G., and STONNER, D. Effect of aggressive-
DOLLARD, J., DOOB, L., MILLER, N., MOWRER, O. ness habit strength on behavior in the presence of
H., and SEARS, R.R. Frustration and Aggression. aggression-related stimuli. Journal of Personality
Yale University Press, 1939. and Social Psychology (1971) 17:149-153.
DONNERSTEIN, E., and DONNERSTEIN, M. Research GUERRA, N. G., NUCCI, L., and HUESMANN, L. R.
in the control of interracial aggression. In R. G. Moral cognition and childhood aggression. In L.
KINGSBURY ET AL.
R. Huesmann, ed., Aggressive Behavior: Current American Journal of Emergency Medicine (1984,
Perspectives (pp. 13-33'. Plenum, 1994. 2:164-70.
HARE, R. D. Psychopathy: Theory and Research. PARKE, R. D., EWALL, W., and SLABY, R. G. Hostile
Wiley, 1970. and helpful verbalizations as regulators of nonver-
HATTI, S., DUBIN, W. R., and WEISS, K. J. A study bal aggression. Journal of Personality and Social
of circumstances surrounding patient assaults on Psychology (1972, 23:243-248.
psychiatrists. Hospital and Community Psychia- RADA, R. T. The violent patient: Rapid assess-
try (1982, 33:660-l. ment and management. Psychosomatics (1981, 22:
HOLLAND, J. G., and SKINNER, B. F. The Analysis 101-9.
of Behavior. McGraw-Hill, 1961. REYNOLDS, G. S. A Primer of Operant Conditioning.
HUESMANN, L. R., ed. Aggressive Behavior: Current Scott, Foresman, 1968.
Perspectives. Plenum, 1994. SKINNER, B. F. Contingencies of Reinforcement: A
KINGSBURY, S. J. Cognitive differences between Theoretical Analysis. Appleton Century Crofts,
clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. Ameri- 1969.
Downloaded by [Bibliothèque de l' Université Paris Descartes] at 07:41 08 August 2017