We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Is Marxism Still Relevant Today?
Eight possible ways in which some aspects of Marxist Theory and
concepts might still be relevant today... Relevant to A2 Sociology Theory
and Methods (details to follow)
1. A class based analysis of global society is still relevant if you look at
things globally.
2. Exploitation still lies at the heart of the Capitalist system if you look
at the practices of many Transnational Corporations.
3. If you look at the recent bank bail outs it appears that those with
economic power still have disproportionate influence over the
superstructure.
4. If you look at how individualised we have become it appears that
many people are still under ideological control ~ but we don’t realise
it. ~
5. Work is still Alienating for many people: +
6. Economic crises are still inherent to the capitalist system and that in
recent years these crises have become“more severe and more
frequent.
7. Capitalist exploitation is so bad in some parts of the world that there
is vehement resistance to it.
8. In Britain there are tens of thousands of people who call themselves
Communists and who sympathise with Marxism and the wider anti-
capitalist movement. Left Wing criticisms and the anti-capitalist
movement is still very much alive today.RY AND METHODS
Economic determinism Critics have accused Marx of
economic determinism = of arguing that economic.
factors determine and shape human behaviour
and the structure of society It is possible to select
passages from Marx's 40 years of writing that appear
{o support this criticism. At certain times, Marx has
claimed that:
> The superstructure is ‘determined! by the
infrastructure
Economic forces beyond human control shape
» History is directed by economic forces which follow
ron laws
> Conflicts of interest between the ruling and subject,
Classes will inevitably lead to revolution, to the
downfall of capitalism and the establishment
of communism,
However, as the next section indicates, the above
criticisms may well go too far.
Although Marx gave priority to economic factors, he did
not see them as the only cause of social change. He did
describe the economic infrastructure as the ‘ultimate
determinant element in history. Yet he added:
Ifsomebody
abstract and senseless phrase. The economic
situation is the basis, but the va
upon the course of the historical struggle and
ate in determining
Marx consistently argued that ‘man makes his own
history: Human behaviour is not simply determined.
by forces beyond human control, In Maras words,
History is nothing but the activity of men in pursuit of
their ends’ Because people make society, only people
can change society
10
Globalisation and multinational corporations The
US economist John Cassidy (1997) claimed that Marx.
would reappear as The next big thinker. Writing
with Engels in 1848, Marx predicted that capitalism
Would spread throughout the world as capitalists
sought to find new markets to maintain profitability
Cassidy believes that Marx correctly identified the
‘dynamic behind the present process of globalisation
He also praises Marx for recognising that even in the
highly productive world of advanced capi
workers would still be extremely poor, This is certainly
true, particularly in less developed countries where
epitalists often employ workers on extremely low
wages.
Cassidy also agrees with Mary’ view that as
2pitalism developed, more and more wealth
‘and power would be concentrated in the hands
of capitalists. The growth of giant multinational
corporations with a bigger turnover than the gross
domestic product of many nation-states provides
support for Marx's view.
Capitalism, crises and growing inequality Marx savy
pitalism as an unstable system moving from crisis
to crisis in its drive to accumulate more and more
pital and ever greater profits. The British Marxist
‘geographerisociologist David Harvey (2010) sees the
recurring financial crises, for example the crises of the
early 1970s and 2007/08, as providing support for
Marx's view.
Marx predicted that in capitalist society income and
wealth would be increasingly concentrated in fewer
and fewer hands. Again, Harvey finds support for
Marx’ view. He notes that, ‘in the United States,
for example, household incomes since the 1970
have generally stagnated in the midst of an immense
‘accumulation of wealth by capitalist class interests!
(Harvey, 2010)
For Harvey, Marx remains relevant and offers possible
solutions to today’s inequalities of cenitalist society, Like
Marx, David Harvey believes ‘We need revolu
politics to replace capitalisry with a fair and just society!
STRUCTURAL THEORIES
In 2011, over 20 000 people occupied! WallStreet, the financial district of New York, protesting against wh they
‘Savy as corporate greed and corruption, and social inequality
‘The Occupy Movement stated that The one thing we have in common is that we are the 99% that will no
longer tolerate the greed and c
ruption of the 1%! (Gautney, 2011). Estimates indicate that the top 1 per
‘cent own around 40 per cent of the nation’s wealth and receive about 25 per cent of the income. The protest
was partly about the financial crisis of 2007/08, the effects of
The posters
NEED NOT GREED
TAX THE FILTHY RICH
OVERTHROW CAPITALISM,
WE ARE THE 99%
hich were stil being felt by millions of people.
ied by the protesters on Wall Street give some idea of their concerns. Typical statements read:
GET $ § OUT OF POLITICS
IT'S A CLASS WAR
PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS
WALL STREET WHERE CRIME PAYS
How might a Marxist explain the Occupy Wall Street Movement?
}-Marxis|
Neo*Marxism or ‘new Marxism’ refers to follo
of Karl Marx who have taken his theories in new
directions. This section looks at two neo-Marxists,
the Italian, Antonio Gramsci (1891-1957) and the
Frenchman, Louis Althusser (1918-1990).
Gramsci (1971) main development of Marxist theory
is his concept of hegemony ~ the means by which the
ruling dass maintains its dominance and control over
the subject class. Hegemony has certain similarities
to Manes view of ruling class ideology and false class
sof political and moral beliefs
and values which justify and maintain ruling cass power.
Hegemony broadcasts the idea that the interests of the
ruling class are those of society as a witole. It provides
ways of seeing and thinking which tend to be taken
for granted, which appear normal and reasonable, but
which distort reality and present a false consciousness,
consciousness, It consi
"1