0% found this document useful (0 votes)
367 views13 pages

Economic Analysis of Business Decisions

This document contains a group assignment submitted by students for their Business Economics course. It includes their responses to multiple questions from Chapters 1 and 2 of the textbook. The questions cover topics like calculating net benefits, present value, and using net present value analysis to evaluate investment decisions for new products under different levels of advertising intensity. The students provide calculations and explanations for their answers to each question.

Uploaded by

effer scente
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
367 views13 pages

Economic Analysis of Business Decisions

This document contains a group assignment submitted by students for their Business Economics course. It includes their responses to multiple questions from Chapters 1 and 2 of the textbook. The questions cover topics like calculating net benefits, present value, and using net present value analysis to evaluate investment decisions for new products under different levels of advertising intensity. The students provide calculations and explanations for their answers to each question.

Uploaded by

effer scente
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ZCMAF6012 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS

SEMESTER II 2020/2021 ACADEMIC SESSION

GROUP ASSIGNMENT 1
Chapter 1 & 2

Submitted to:

Prof. Dr. Othman Yong

Prepared by:

MATRIC NO.
ZP05342 ZP05303
ZP05399 ZP05385
ZP05441 ZP05346
ZP05359 ZP05446
ZP05333

UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA


ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

CHAPTER 1
Question 3

Suppose that the total benefit and total cost from a continuous activity are, respectively, given by
the following equations: B(Q) = 100 + 36Q – 4Q2 and CQ = 80 + 12Q.

MB(Q) = 36 -8Q and MC(Q) = 12]


a. Write out the equation for the net benefits.

Net benefits = Total benefits – Total cost

N(Q) = B(Q) – C(Q)

N(Q) = 100+36 –4Q2–80–12Q

N(Q) = -4Q2+24Q+20

b. What are the net benefits when Q = 1? Q = 5?

N (Q) = -4Q2+24Q+20

i. When Q=1
N(Q) = -4(1)2+24(1) +20
N(Q) =40

ii. When Q=5


N(Q) = -4(5)2+24(5) +20
N(Q) = -100+120+20
N(Q) =40

c. Write out the equation for the marginal net benefits.

Marginal net benefits, MNB(Q) = MB(Q) – MC(Q)

MNB(Q) = 36 -8Q -12


ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

MNB(Q) = -8Q + 24

d. What are the marginal net benefits when Q = 1? Q = 5?

Given, MNB(Q) = -8Q+24

i. When Q=1
MNB(Q) =-8(1) +24
MNB(Q) =16

ii. When Q=5


MNB(Q) = -8(5) +24
MNB(Q) = -40+24
MNB(Q) = -16

e. What level of Q maximizes net benefits?

At the maximum value of the net benefit, the difference between the marginal benefit and the
marginal cost is zero, indicating that the net benefit is maximized at the point where the marginal
net benefit is equal to zero.

MNB(Q) = -8Q+24

-8Q+24=0

8Q=24

Q= 24
8
Q=3 units

f. At the value of Q that maximizes net benefits, what is the value of marginal net benefits?

N (Q) = -4Q2+24Q+20

= -4(3)2+24(3) +20
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

= -36+72+20

=56

Question 10

An owner can lease her building for $120,000 per year for three years. The explicit cost of
maintaining the building is $40,000, and the implicit cost is $55,000. All revenues are received,
and costs borne, at the end of each year. If the interest rate is 5 percent, determine the present value
of the stream of:

a. Accounting profits. b. Economic profits.

a) Accounting Profit

Accounting Profit = Total Revenue – Explicit Cost

= $ 120,000 - $ 40,000

= $ 80,000
𝐹𝑉
Present Value, PV =
(1+𝑖)𝑛

80,000 80,000 80,000


=
(1+0.05)1
+ (1+0.05)2 +
(1+0.05)3

= $ 217,859. 84

b) Economic Profit

Economic Profit = Total Revenue – (Explicit cost + Implicit Cost)

= $ 120,000 – ($ 40,000 + $ 55,000)

= $ 25,000
25,000 25,000 25,000
Present Value, PV =
(1+0.05)1
+ (1+0.05)2 +
(1+0.05)3

= $ 68,081.20
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

Question 12

You are in the market for a new refrigerator for your company’s lounge, and you have narrowed
the search down to two models. The energy-efficient model sells for $1,700 and will save you $45
in electricity costs at the end of each of the next five years. The standard model has features similar
to the energy-efficient models but provides no future saving in electricity costs. It is priced at only
$1,500. Assuming your opportunity cost of funds is 6 percent, which refrigerator should you
purchase?

The net present value is:

$45 $45 $45 $45 $45


NPV= + + + + − $200
1.06 (1.06)2 (1.06)3 (1.06)4 (1.06)5

= $189.56 − $200

= − $10.44

The refrigerator that should be chosen is the standard model because it will save us $10.44 in terms
of the present value.

Question 15

Approximately 14 million Americans are addicted to drugs and alcohol. The federal government
estimates that these addicts cost the U.S. economy $300 billion in medical expenses and lost
productivity. Despite the enormous potential market, many biotech companies have shied away
from funding research and development (R&D) initiatives to find cure for drug and alcohol
addiction. Your firm – Drug Abuse Sciences (DAS) – is a notable exception. It has spent $200
million to date working on a cure, but is now at a crossroads. It can either abandon its program or
invest another $60 million today.

Unfortunately, the firm’s opportunity cost of funds is 5 percent, and it will take another five years
before final approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is achieved and the product
is actually sold. Expected (year-end) profits from selling the drug are presented in the
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

accompanying table. Should DAS continue with its plan to bring the drug to market, or should it
abandon the project? Explain.

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9

$0 $0 $0 $0 $12M $13.4M $17.2M $20.7M $20.7M

By the given situation, Drug Abuse Sciences (DAS) firm should not invest further because the
net present value of the income stream generated did not achieve the current cost of the project.
The explanation by using equation is as follows;

𝑓𝑣1 𝑓𝑣2 𝑓𝑣3 𝑓𝑣9


𝑁𝑃𝑣 = 1
+ 2
+ 3
+⋯ − 𝐶0
(1 + ⅈ) (1 + ⅈ) (1 + ⅈ) (1 + ⅈ)9

= 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 12m + 13.4m + 17.2m + 20.7m + 22.45m

1.05 1.102 1.157 1.2155 1.2762 1.340 1.407 1.477 1.551

= USD 60,108,613.11 – USD 200,000,000

= USD - 139, 891,386.89

Question 16

As a marketing manager for one of the world’s largest automakers, you are responsible for the
advertising campaign for a new energy-efficient sports utility vehicle. Your support team has
prepared the accompanying table, which summarizes the (year-end) profitability, estimated
number of vehicles sold, and average estimated selling price for alternative levels of advertising.

The accounting department projects that the best alternative use for the funds used in the
advertising campaign is an investment returning 9 percent. In light of the staggering cost of
advertising (which accounts for the lower projected profits in years 1 and 2 for the high and
moderate advertising intensities), the team leader recommends a low advertising intensity in order
to maximize the value of the firm. Do you agree? Explain.
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

Profitability by Advertising Intensity

Profits (in millions) Units Sold (in thousands) Average Selling Price

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Advertising Intensity

High $20 $80 $300 10 60 120 $35,000 $36,500 $38,000

Moderate 40 80 135 5 12.5 25 35,800 36,100 36,300

Low 75 110 118 4 6 7.2 35,900 36,250 36,000

Answer:

There is a situation whereby the team leader recommends low level of advertising intensity in
order to maximize the value of the firm. However, the 3-years profit projection shows that low
advertising intensity level may result into low profit in the final year, in comparison to the
projected profit for the final year with high level of advertising intensity which may doubled the
profit from low intensity advertising budget.

Furthermore, the table also suggests that low advertising intensity will undermine the number of
units sold on the 3rd year tremendously in comparison with the sale of units that may be resulted
from high intensity level of advertising which multiplied almost 17 times more than the former
option.

Therefore, it is quite an evident that moderate and low intensive advertisement campaign may
results in higher profits in the initial years, but if the company invest on high intensity level of
advertisement, therefore the profit is projected much higher in 3rd year.

Given from the projection that the investment will be returning at 9%, therefore, to choose the best
resort to maximise the value of the company, the present value analysis (PV) can further detail as
follows:
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

Yearly profit
Hard Moderate Low
PV

Profit PV Profit PV Profit PV


($ mil) ($ mil) ($ mil) ($ mil) ($ mil) ($ mil)
Intensity level of
advertisement

Year 1 20 18 40 37 75 69

Year 2 80 68 80 68 110 93

Year 3 300 232 135 104 118 91

TOTAL
318 209 252
($ mil)

Based from this analysis, the recommendation by team leader to opt for low intensity
advertisement will only put the company at the middle value between the highest ($318 mil.) and
lowest ($209 mil.), then it will not drive up the company to achieve at the desired value. Therefore,
then the best way to maximize the value of the firm is to reconsider the recommendation from the
team leader and then it is preferably for the firm to use hard intensity ads/campaign since it prevails
to mark the highest PV among other two methods of advertisement.
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

CHAPTER 2
Question 1

The X-Corporation produces a good (called X) that is a normal good. Its competitor, Y-Corp.,
makes a substitute good that it markets under the name Y. Good Y is an inferior good.

a. How will the demand for good X change if consumer incomes decrease?

If consumer income increases, demand for good X will increase where the definition of a normal
good is when consumer incomes increase, demand for a normal good will increase as well. The
demand curve will be shift to the right.

b. How will the demand for good Y change if consumer incomes increase?

Since Y is an inferior good, a decrease in income will lead to an increase in the demand for good
Y. Thus, the demand curve will be shift to the right.

c. How will the demand for good X change if the price for good Y increases?

If the goods X and Y are substitutes, a decrease in the price of good Y will lead to a decrease in
the demand for good X. Thus, the demand curve for X will shift to the left.

d. Is good Y a lower-quality product than good X? Explain.

No. The term inferior good does not mean inferior quality but it simply means that the income and
consumption are inversely related.

Question 4

The demand for good X is given by Qxd = 6,000 – 0.5Px – Py + 9Pz + 0.2M.

Research shows that the prices of related goods are given by Py = $6,500 and Pz =$100, while the
average income of individuals consuming this product is M = $70,000.
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

a. Indicate whether goods Y and Z are substitutes or complements for good X.

i. Goods Y are complements for X as the price of Goods Y are decreased.

ii. Goods Z are substitutes for X as the price of Goods Z are increased.

b. Is X an inferior or a normal good?

X is a normal good as the increase of income will cause consumer to buy less of of good X.

c. How many units of good X will be purchased when Px = $5,230?

Qxd = 6,000 – 0.5Px – Py + 9Pz + 0.2M

= 6,000 – 0.5(5,230) – 6,500 + 9(100) + 0.2(70,000)

= 6,000 – 2,615 – 6,500 + 900 + 14,000

= 11,785 units

d. Determine the demand function and inverse demand function for good X.

Qxd = 6,000 – 0.5Px – Py + 9Pz + 0.2M

= 14,400 – 0.5Px

=Px = 28,800 - 1 Qxd


0.5

Question 5

The demand curve for product X is given by Qxd = 300 – 2Px.

a. Find the inverse demand curve.

Qxd = 300 – 2Px


ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

2Px = 300 – Qxd

Px = 300 – Qxd
2
Px = 150 – Qxd
2

b. How much consumer surplus do consumers receive when Px = $45?

Px = 45

45 = 150 – Qxd
2
Qx = (150 – 45) x 2
d

Qxd = 210

Consumer Surplus = 0.5 x Qxd x (Pmax – Px)

Consumer Surplus = 0.5 x 210 x (150 – 45)

Consumer Surplus = 11,025

c. How much consumer surplus do consumers receive when Px = $30?

Px = $30

30 = 150 – Qxd
2
Qxd = (150 – 30) x 2

Qxd = 240

Consumer Surplus: 0.5 x 240 x (150 – 30)

Consumer Surplus: 14,400

d. In general, what happens to the level of consumer surplus as the price of a good falls?

In general, consumer surplus always increases as the price of a good falls because of the increase
in gap between the maximum price consumers are willing to pay (Pmax) and the price of the good
(Px).
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

Question 6

Suppose demand and supply are given by Qd = 60 – P and Qs = P – 20.

a. What are the equilibrium quantity and price in this market?

Price: Qd = Qs
Qd = 60 - P = Qs = P- 20
60 - P = P - 20
P = 60-20
=40

That’s mean,
Qd= 60 - 40 = 40-20
P- Equilibruim = 60 - 40
= $20

b. Determine the quantity demanded, the quantity supplied, and the magnitude of the
surplus if a price floor of $50 is imposed in this market.

Quantity Demanded = Qd = 60 – 50
= 10
Quantity supplied = Qs= 50 – 20
= 30
Magnitude of surplus = Qs –Qd = 30-10
= 20

c. Determine the quantity demanded, the quantity supplied, and the magnitude of the
shortage if a price ceiling of $32 is imposed in this market. Also determine the full economic
price paid by consumers.

Quantuity demanded = Qd = 60-32


= 28
ZCMA6012 BUSINESS ECONOMICS

Quantity supplied= Qs = 32 – 20
=12
Magnitude of surplus= Qd – Qs = 28 - 12
= 16

Question 9

The supply curve for product X is given by Qxs = - 520 + 20Px.

a. Find the inverse supply curve.

Given, Qxs = – 520 + 20Px

Qxs + 520 = 20Px.

Px = Qxs + 26
20

b. How much surplus do producers receive when Qx = 400? When Qx = 1,200?

i. When Qx = 400

Px = 400 + 26
20
= 46

ii. When Qx = 1,200

Px = 1,200 + 26
20
= 86

Common questions

Powered by AI

Opportunity cost plays a critical role as it represents the forgone benefits from allocating resources to an alternative option. In investment decisions, like evaluating the continuation of a R&D project or advertising campaign, opportunity costs are the returns from the next best alternative. They must be considered alongside projected future cash flows. If the present value of projected cash flows, discounted for risk and time, does not exceed the total cost and the opportunity cost, continuing the project may not be economically justified, as shown with Drug Abuse Sciences (DAS) and the advertising intensity example .

Marginal net benefits determine the optimal production quantity by equating marginal benefits with marginal costs. The net benefit is maximized at the quantity where marginal net benefits are zero. This occurs when the additional benefit from producing one more unit no longer exceeds its additional cost, thus maximizing the difference between total benefits and total costs. This balance achieves the firm's highest potential profit or payoff .

A price ceiling below the equilibrium price creates a shortage in the market. Consumers demand more of the good due to the lower price, but suppliers are less willing or able to supply enough to meet this increased demand. This results in an excess demand over supply, quantified by the difference between quantity demanded (consumers want more at the lower price) and quantity supplied (suppliers offer less due to the decreased incentives).

A change in the price of a substitute good inversely affects the demand for the primary good. If the substitute's price increases, consumers shift their preference to the primary good, increasing its demand, shifting the demand curve to the right. Conversely, a decrease in the substitute's price may diminish demand for the primary good as consumers find the substitute more attractive, shifting the demand curve to the left .

Supply curve shifts reflect changes in quantity supplied at different price levels, revealing producers' adaptability to price changes. When prices rise, the supply curve shifts right, showing increased quantity supplied due to higher potential earnings. Conversely, a leftward shift with falling prices indicates producers are less inclined to supply. These shifts indicate producers' response to maximize profits based on the price mechanism, affecting market equilibrium, potential shortages, or surpluses, thus impacting market dynamics and resource allocation .

Consumer surplus increases as the price of a good decreases, which signifies that consumers are able to derive more benefits for less cost relative to their maximum willingness to pay. This increase in consumer surplus reflects consumer behavior where a lower price extends the quantity of goods consumers are willing to purchase, making the gap between what they're willing to pay (their maximum utility) and what they actually pay larger, thus increasing surplus .

The demand curve for good Y, an inferior good, shifts due to changes in consumer income because such goods are purchased more as consumers' incomes decrease. With higher incomes, consumers tend to purchase normal goods instead, leaving inferior goods with reduced demand. Therefore, for inferior goods, an increase in consumer income causes the demand curve to shift left, indicating reduced demand, while a decrease in income shifts it right, indicating increased demand .

A firm's decision to invest in advertising rather than direct production cost improvements can be rational when advertising results in a sufficiently higher increase in sales and profitability over time, exceeding the benefits from reducing production costs. This decision often employs present value analysis to forecast long-term financial returns from increased sales due to higher advertising intensity, as seen in comparing advertising intensities for vehicle sales. The goal is to create brand awareness and market expansion leading to increased demand and price leverage, potentially offering greater returns than production efficiencies .

The economic principle influencing the decision is the net present value (NPV) approach. For the energy-efficient refrigerator, the future savings are calculated with present value by applying a 6% discount rate and compared to additional costs over the standard model. Since the NPV was found to be negative at -$10.44, indicating a net loss, the standard model with a lower upfront cost and no future savings was recommended, as it results in a lower cost in present value terms .

The present value of accounting profits is calculated by subtracting explicit costs from total revenue and then discounting the profits received each year at the given interest rate. In the example, with an interest rate of 5%, accounting profits are determined as $80,000 per year and discounted to present values, resulting in a present value of $217,859.84. Economic profits, however, account for both explicit and implicit costs subtracted from total revenue, resulting in different yearly profits of $25,000, with a present value of $68,081.20 .

You might also like