0% found this document useful (0 votes)
309 views3 pages

Coblaw 2

1. A valid contract requires a meeting of the minds between parties where one party binds themselves to give, do or not do something for the other party. It is generally based on mutual consent. 2. Some examples of invalid contracts included a "one-night stand" contract sold due to insolvency, contracts involving illegal acts like falsifying documents or requiring sexual acts, and contracts for gambling losses or involving subjects outside of commerce. 3. Valid contracts require offer and acceptance, lawful object and consideration, capacity of the parties, and real consent not obtained through mistake, fraud, violence or other vices. Written contracts are not required but provide more evidence of an agreement.

Uploaded by

Eana Ranillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
309 views3 pages

Coblaw 2

1. A valid contract requires a meeting of the minds between parties where one party binds themselves to give, do or not do something for the other party. It is generally based on mutual consent. 2. Some examples of invalid contracts included a "one-night stand" contract sold due to insolvency, contracts involving illegal acts like falsifying documents or requiring sexual acts, and contracts for gambling losses or involving subjects outside of commerce. 3. Valid contracts require offer and acceptance, lawful object and consideration, capacity of the parties, and real consent not obtained through mistake, fraud, violence or other vices. Written contracts are not required but provide more evidence of an agreement.

Uploaded by

Eana Ranillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Contract Law Scenarios: Provides a series of hypothetical scenarios related to contract law, each requiring an evaluation of the contract's status as valid, void, or otherwise.

1.

A contract, as a source of obligation, is a meeting of minds between persons whereby one


binds himself to the other to give, to do, or not to do. It is generally consensual in nature.
TRUE
2. LUCIFER, due to his insolvency, sold for P1M to AMENADIEL a “one-night stand”
with his wife CHLOE with the desperate consent of the latter. The object of contract is
valid in view of the consent given by CHLOE. FALSE
3. A valid contract is formed when AMENADIEL offered to give LINDA Php 15,000 in
exchange for her professional psychiatric services, and she accepted as long as she also
receives AMENADIEL’s necklace. FALSE
4. AMENADIEL offered to sell his determinate car to LINDA for P5.69M, which was
accepted by her on the condition that they will be self-service laundry business partners.
This counter-offer of LINDA was accepted by AMENADIEL. The contract was
perfected when LINDA accepted the offer of AMENADIEL. FALSE
5. LUCIFER challenged MICHAEL that if the latter can take a picture of the underwear of
LINDA while walking up the Miguel Building stairs and show it to him, he will give him
a prize of P50K. The contract is valid until apprehended and somebody questions their
agreement. FALSE
6. All contracts are agreements but not all agreements are contracts. TRUE
7. LINDA and MICHAEL entered into a contract of sale involving a determinate car of
LUCIFER for P5.69M, the ownership documents of which were falsified by LINDA.
Among their stipulations, they agreed that LINDA shall sexually gratify MICHAEL so as
not to squeal about the falsification. Said stipulation is valid in view of the principle of
autonomy of contracts. FALSE
8. In intimidation, as a vice of consent, there is moral persuasion without fear created in the
mind of a party. FALSE
9. MICHAEL sold to LUCIFER his determinate house and lot for P10M, which he paid
immediately. When they reduced the contract in writing, they forgot to state the P10M
consideration. The written contract remains to be valid despite the lack of indicated
cause. TRUE
10. A contract of sale involving the South China Sea for US$10T to LUCIFER is voidable
for having an object that is outside the commerce of man. FALSE
11. "Shopee" messaged LINDA that a 15% discount shall be given to her if she will buy at
least 5 pieces of UV disinfecting boxes on or before September 9, 2020. The day after,
said boxes were delivered to LINDA on "cash on delivery" mode of payment with 15%
discount. LINDA cannot refuse to pay because their contract is already perfected when
the boxes were delivered to her. FALSE
12. Stipulation pour autrui requires consent on the part of the third person beneficiary,
without which it cannot be valid. TRUE
13. AMENADIEL employed undue influence on CHLOE, as her pastor, to enter into a
contract of sale with him involving his determinate car, but the latter gently declined. The
contract is voidable. FALSE
14. When consent to a contract is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence
or fraud, the contract is not void. TRUE
15. CHLOE is indebted to LINDA for P10M. When CHLOE died insolvent leaving nothing
to her heirs, LINDA is not legally allowed to collect from CHLOE's daughter, TRIXIE,
the indebtedness. TRUE
16. AMENADIEL appointed LUCIFER to sell his determinate car for P5M. The contract
entered into by them is preparatory in nature. TRUE
17. AMENADIEL employed violence to get the consent of CHLOE to enter into a contract
of sale with him involving his determinate car. The contract is voidable. TRUE
18. LINDA, a deaf-mute, entered into a contract of sale involving her determinate cellphöne
to 21-year old AMENADIEL for P5K. The contract of sale was reduced in writing
through the help of LUCIFER, a sign language interpreter. The sale is valid. TRUE
19. DAN obliges self to give CHLOE P10,000 per month through TRIXIE until he finishes
college. CHLOE agrees and communicated the same to TRIXIE but before DAN learns
about it, he decided to revoke the same for an act of ingratitude committed by CHLOE
against him. There is an enforceable stipulation pour autrui against DAN. FALSE
20. Autonomy of contracts connotes the binding effect of parties' stipulations unto
themselves, provided they áte not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public policy or
public order. FALSE
21. MICHAEL and LUCIFER entered into a written contract of sale involving all the
former's properties for P10M in order to defraud and avoid paying his creditor
AMENADIEL. Said contract of sale is absolutely simulated. TRUEe
22. A contract of loan is a principal contract but a contract of mortgage supporting it is
merely an accessory contract. TRUE
23. LUCIFER emailed LINDA advising her that he is selling his "top of the line" determinate
car for P5.69M. LINDA believed said assurance. After the sale, LINDA found another
car which is "much better" that what she bought. The sale contract is voidable. FALSE
24. AMENADIEL, at the point of a gun, compelled CHLOE to marry him. Pending their
annulment case, AMENADIEL subsequently married LINDA. AMENADIEL is not
criminally liable for bigamy because his first contract of marriage was void. FALSE
25. Mutuality of contracts connotes that the parties are both equally bound by the contract
they enter into. TRUE
26. An accessory contract is always dependent on a principal contract, while a principal
contract cannot be made to depend on an accessory contract. TRUE
27. A valid contract is formed when MICHAEL, after removing CHLOE's thumb, got her
Porsche Carrera car with plate number ABC 123 in exchange for Php 20M from
MICHAEL's bank account. FALSE
28. LINDA, 16 years of age, entered into a contract of sale involving her determinate
cellphone to 21-year old AMENADIEL for P5K. The sale is voidable. TRUE
29. MICHAEL and LUCIFER played poker at the Casino Filipino. They lost P5M in one
night. They legally filed a case against Casino Filipino in order to compel the latter to
return their money because gambling cannot be a valid subject matter of a contract.
FALSE
30. A contract needs to be written in order to be valid. FALSE
31. Purchase of a determinate car for P1M by an insolvent in order to escape payment of his
unpaid creditor. What is the status of the contract? Recissible
32. Verbal sale of a specific "Guess" jeans for P2,000.00 to an insane who wore it at a party.
What is the status of the contract? Voidable
33. Sale of a particular property by the defendant in a pending court case without the
knowledge of the parties and of the court. What is the status of the contract? Recissible
34. Notarized sale of the entire Pacific Ocean for US$300T. What is the status of the
contract? Void
35. Written sale of a determinate puppy for P25K without a certificate of pedigree. What is
the status of the contract? Valid
36. Notarized sale of a determinate condominium unit for P5M, but failed to indicate the
amount in the contract. What is the status of the contract? Void
37. Notarized sale of a determinate property by an insolvent in order to defraud his creditors.
What is the status of the contract? Recissible
38. Verbal sale of a share of stock worth P500.00. What is the status of the contract?
Unenforceable
39. Contract of marriage between JAMIE and CLAIRE who misrepresented himself to be a
man, but in reality a homosexual, and cannot perform the marital roles of a husband.
What is the status of the contract? Voidable
40. Deaf-mute's verbal sale of his determinate second hand pair of shoes for P450 to an
18-year old boy through sign language. What is the status of the contract? Valid
41. Sale of a determinate laptop which the seller misrepresented to be brand-new. What is the
status of the contract? Rescissible
42. Notarized sale of a determinate building and land made by a verbally-appointed agent to
a real estate broker. What is the status of the contract? Unenforceable
43. Written sale of a determinate laptop for P45K to a minor. What is the status of the
contract? Voidable
44. Partially paid verbal sale of a specific refrigerator for P25,000.00. What is the status of
the contract? Valid
45. CLAIRE verbally sold and delivered a specific computer owned by JAMIE to her friend,
BRIANNA, for P15,000.00. What is the status of the contract? Valid
46. Verbal contract of rent of a determinate condominium unit for 1 year at P10K monthly.
What is the status of the contract? Valid
47. Verbal sale of 3 grams of shabu to a minor. What is the status of the contract? Void
48. Verbal sale of specific wrist watch for P450.00 to be performed 15 months therefrom.
What is the status of the contract? Unenforceable
49. Sale of a determinate car worth P7M by a guardian for P2.5M. What is the status of the
contract? Rescissible
50. Written dation in payment in the amount of P10,000.00. What is the status of the
contract? Valid

You might also like