100% found this document useful (3 votes)
1K views3 pages

Teacher Classroom Observation Rating Checklist

This document contains a teacher classroom observation rating checklist used to evaluate a teacher's performance. It assesses various aspects of classroom preparation and management, teaching and learning process, pupil assessment, and classroom interaction. The teacher is rated on a scale of 2 to 10 for different indicators within each aspect, and an overall rating is calculated based on the subtotals and weightings of each aspect.

Uploaded by

Jeffrey G. Palad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (3 votes)
1K views3 pages

Teacher Classroom Observation Rating Checklist

This document contains a teacher classroom observation rating checklist used to evaluate a teacher's performance. It assesses various aspects of classroom preparation and management, teaching and learning process, pupil assessment, and classroom interaction. The teacher is rated on a scale of 2 to 10 for different indicators within each aspect, and an overall rating is calculated based on the subtotals and weightings of each aspect.

Uploaded by

Jeffrey G. Palad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

M Form 3B-1

TEACHER CLASSROOM OBSERVATION RATING CHECKLIST


TEACHER: SCHOOL: DISTRICT: VILLABA NORTH START:
GRADE/YEAR: SUBJECT: DATE: FINISH:
OBJECTIVE: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________.

CLASSROOM PREPARTION MANAGEMENT


P US S VS O
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2 4 6 8 10 REMARKS/AGREEMENTS
1. Classroom was structured to enhance
learning (display board, seating 2 4 6 8 10
arrangement, light, ventilation, etc.
2. All necessary visual aids/instructional
materials were prepared ahead f time. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Boardwork was prepared before classes
Started. 2 4 6 8 10
4. Teacher was flexible in his/her time
management. 2 4 6 8 10
5. Maintained order and discipline in
Classroom. 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+ _____+ _____+ ______+______ = ____/5= ______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
The Teacher
1. Clearly formulated the objective of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
2. Attained the objective of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Showed proficiency in required language of
instruction. 2 4 6 8 10
4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured
The interest of the learners. 2 4 6 8 10
5. Used real life situations, concrete objects, print
and non-print materials in the 2 4 6 8 10
presentation/development of the lesson.
6. Considered interweaving of task/skill/process
And content. 2 4 6 8 10
7. Provided meaningful connections between and
among learning opportunities, prior knowledge,
relevant events and the learner’s lives and 2 4 6 8 10
experiences.
8. Employed/utilized integrative strategies
_______ Integration of values in the subject
taught.
_______ Integration of Science and Health
concepts in English as content. 2 4 6 8 10
_______ Integration of SK/HKS concepts in
Filipino as content.
_______ Integration of EPP,HKS and MSEP
integration across learning areas.
9. Provided varied activities to encourage
participation of everyone especially slow 2 6 8 10
learners. 4
10. Provided activities for interactive/group work/
cooperative learning. 2 4 6 8 10
11. Acted as facilitator during class discussion. 2 4 6 8 10
12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to
the objective of the lesson 2 4 6 8 10
13. Recognized pupil’s individual differences and
provided activities for
_____________remediation 2 4 6 8 10
_____________reinforcement
_____________enrichment
14. Asked questions that developed critical thinking
skills, e.g. open-ended questions. 2 4 6 8 10
15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson
 Used textbooks/materials 2 4 6 8 10
 Used textbooks/materials
Clearly/appropriately
 Used instructional materials creatively to
Get ideas across.
16. Showed over-all mastery of the subject matter
2 4 6 8 10
17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson
2 4 6 8 10
18. Asked/answered questions reflecting Higher
Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) 2 4 6 8 10
19. Were generally happy in class.
2 4 6 8 10
20. Were generally motivated to learn more.
2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+______+______+______+______= ______/20=______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total Points)
III. ASSESSMENT OF PUPILS
1. Learning was evaluated through seatwork
exercises/paper and pencil test. 2 4 6 8 10
2. Learning was evaluated through portfolio
Assessment. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Learner’s other needs were diagnosed after the
Lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
4. The lesson was assessed to determine if the
objective was attained within the allotted time. 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+______+______+______+______= ______/4 =______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total Points)
IV. CLASSROOM INTERACTION
RATE THE TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS AS A WHOLE IN TERMS OF INTERACTION
1. Pupil –Teacher Interaction
2 4 6 8 10
2. Pupil-Pupil Interaction
2 4 6 8 10
3. Pupil-Materilas Interaction
2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+______+______+______+______= ______/3 =______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total Points)
(b)
V. OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Rating Scale: SUMMARY OF RATING Weight Rating Points


(a) (b) (axb)

10 – Outstanding I. Classroom Prep./Mgt. 20% ______ ______


8 – Very Satisfactory II. Teaching-Learning Process 50% ______ ______
6 – Satisfactory III. Pupil Assessment 20% ______ ______
4 – Unsatisfactory/Below Average IV. Classroom Interaction 10% ______ ______

Over all Rating _________________


Key to Descriptive Rating

8.60 - 10.00 = O Observed by: RHODORA V. TUMAMAK


6.60 - 8.59 = VS (Signature Over Printed Name)
4.60 - 6.59 = S
2.60 - 4.59 = US Position: Head Teacher -I
2.59 and below = P
Date: _________________________________

Conforme:

Teacher Observed / Rated: _____________ ____________

(Signature Over Printed Name)


Date: _______________________________________________

You might also like