example of these following assessment techniques:

Observation; Performance; Project; Written Test; Oral Test; Assignment; and Portfolio
1. Observation

Low Level
Implementatio Moderate High Level
criteria n Implementation Implementation
1. during reading,
list questions on
paper for later
review with group
members; seeks
questions form the
text-reflecting on
what he or she does
not understand. 1 2 3 4 5
2. leads group
discussion by
sharing and seeking
group discussion of
questions, drawing
form others and
seeking answers to
questions trough
collaboration. 1 2 3 4 5
3. shares questons
with group in a
manner that
promotes natural
converstation. 1 2 3 4 5
4. Explicit Focus on
Positive
Interdependence
Learns the material
and ensures that all
group members
learn the assigned
material. 1 2 3 4 5
5. Extensive Group
Member Interaction 1 2 3 4 5
6. Clear Focus on 1 2 3 4 5
Individual Work to
Contribute to the
Achievement of the
Whole Group
Student is
accountable for
his/her portion of
the group work.
He/she contributes
his/her fair share.
7. Established use
of Interpersonal
and Small-group
Skills Enacts a
Win/Win attitude
encouraging others
to complete their
tasks to achieve the
overall goal.
Problem solving
and cooperative
attitudes are
critical. 1 2 3 4 5
Synthesis score for
role (items 1-3):
Synthesis score for
cooperative
behaviors (items 4-
7):
Synthesis score for
overall role
performance (items
1-7):

2. assessment Performance

Levels of performance
Category Criteria
0 1 2 4
2.1 Learning
task for
Cognitive cognitive
activization depth
2.2 Classroom
discourse
Classroom 5.1 Lesson
management
and clarity of
instruction design
5.2 Teaching
techniques
6.1
Curriculum
Student 1.1 Learning
support goals
1.2
Metacognitive
skills
5.3
Differentiatio
n,
personalizatio
n
6.2 Feedback
3. assessment Project

no item Grading & Rating Criteria Scores Shares Scores Gained

Clear theme and good
1 Design
structure. 10
Fluent English, no reading
the paper. 10
Normal speed: not too fast,
English not too slow 10
2
Proficiency
Good voice, clarity and
variety. 5
Good pronunciation. 5
Natural and appropriate
gestures with good facial
expression. 5
Enough eye contact with the
3 Manner audience. 10
Enthusiastic, high mood,
attractive, impressive. 15
Proper or professional dress. 5
4 Time Limit Within 4.5 to 5 minutes. 10
5 PPT Well-designed PPT with 5
visible text.
 200-300 words, using bullet
points. 5
No more than 18 slides. 5
Total Scores 100
4. assessment Written Test

Componen
ts of Weighting
Writing Score Level Indicators
Present the information well chosen details
4 Excellent across the paragraph
Content Present the information with details in
3 Good parts of the paragraph 3
(C)
2 Fair Present the information with some details
1 Poor Present no clear information
4 Excellent Good in vocabulary choice
Error in vocabulary choice are few and do
3 Good not interfere with understanding
Vocabular Error in vocabulary choice are and 2,5
y (V) sometimes they interfere with
2 Fair understanding
Many error in vocabulary choice that
1 Poor severally interfere with understanding
4 Excellent Good in grammar
Error in grammar choice are few and do
3 Good not interfere with understanding
Grammar Error in grammar choice are and
sometimes they interfere with 2,5
(G)
2 Fair understanding
Many error in grammar choice that
severally interfere
1 Poor with understanding
Mechanics Good in spelling, punctuation and 2
(M) 4 Excellent capitalization
Error in spelling, punctuation and
3 Good capitalization are few
Error in spelling, punctuation and
capitalization, and sometimes interfere
2 Fair with understanding
1 Poor Error in spelling, punctuation and
capitalization and severely interfere with
 understanding
5. assessment Oral Test

Student's
name:
Course/level:
Weak Fair Good Very good Excellen
Use of
conversation
strategies
(gestures, eye
contact, voice
volume, etc) 2 4 6 8 10
Presentation'
s organization 2 4 6 8 10
Grammar
accuracy 2 4 6 8 10
Use of the
required
vocabulary 2 4 6 8 10
Fluency 2 4 6 8 10
6. assessment Assignment

Sample 1 (n = Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4

Question 46) (n = 26) (n = 33) (n = 25)
To what extent
did the book
review help you
find ways to
apply some of
the social
psychological
concepts and/or
theories that you
learned about in 3.79** 3.96** 4.33** 3.64**
this course? (1.04) (1.08) (.65) (.82)
How much did 3.36* 3.77** 4.15** 3.44*(.88)
the book review (1.13) (.99) (.76)
assignment help
you to closely
examine the
relevance of the
course material
to events beyond
your own
particular
experience?
How much did
your having a
choice in what
book to read add
value to the
assignment for 4.33** 3.96** 4.23**
you? (1.12) (1.0) 4.64**(.55) (91)
How much did
this assignment
encourage you to
think critically
about the course 3.49** 3.88** 4.03** 3.69**
material? (1.11) (91) (.77) (.62)
To what extent
did your book
review
assignment
make a
significant
contribution to
your learning in 3.19** 3.19 3.79** 3.21
this course? (1.09) (.98) (.60) (.96)
7. Portfolio Assessment
Score If the student…..
4 Includes a piece of work for each item on the checklist that clearly meets
the criteria suggested,
3 Includes a piece of work for each item on the checklist, writes a short
paragraph about each item, is somewhat reflective of how his or her
thinking has changed
2 Includes a piece of work for each item, writes something about each
piece
1 Includes a piece of work for most items, writers little about thepieces of
work
0 Does not complete the task ,or gives information that has nothing to do
with the work chosen