0% found this document useful (0 votes)
515 views30 pages

Case Study: Milwaukee Art Museum: ARCH 631: Structural Systems Prof. Anne Nichols Aaron M. Vorwerk

The document discusses the Milwaukee Art Museum expansion project designed by architect Santiago Calatrava. It provides background on the museum and Calatrava. It then details Calatrava's design for the Quadracci Pavilion expansion, including structural features and analysis of the building.

Uploaded by

Farah Abu-Squir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
515 views30 pages

Case Study: Milwaukee Art Museum: ARCH 631: Structural Systems Prof. Anne Nichols Aaron M. Vorwerk

The document discusses the Milwaukee Art Museum expansion project designed by architect Santiago Calatrava. It provides background on the museum and Calatrava. It then details Calatrava's design for the Quadracci Pavilion expansion, including structural features and analysis of the building.

Uploaded by

Farah Abu-Squir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Case Study:

Milwaukee Art Museum

ARCH 631: Structural Systems


Prof. Anne Nichols
Aaron M. Vorwerk
Contents

The Milwaukee Art Museum

The Architect

The Quadracci Pavilion

Design Concept

Building Layout

Structural Features

Summary
The Milwaukee Art Museum
• Began with Layton Art Gallery (1888) and Milwaukee Art Institute (1918)
• Joined to form Milwaukee Art Center in 1957 and moved into new Eero
Saarinen-designed building on Milwaukee waterfront
The Milwaukee Art Museum
• Museum collection continued to expand throughout the 1980s and ’90s
• Attendance increased dramatically, approaching 200,000 annual visitors
• Both factors prompted consideration of an expansion
• Looking for a strong architectural statement, museum officials turned to
architect and engineer Santiago Calatrava in 1994
• Calatrava’s design was unveiled in March 1996, receiving an
enthusiastic response from the community
• The Quadracci Pavilion was completed in October 2001, becoming the
first building constructed by Calatrava in the United States
The Milwaukee Art Museum
The Architect

• Santiago Calatrava was born in Valencia, Spain in 1951


• He earned a degree in architecture from Escuela Tecnica Superior de
Arquitectura in Valencia
• He then pursued studies in the field of civil engineering, completing a
Ph.D. from the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland in
1979
The Architect
• Calatrava began entering design competitions to gain recognition
• His first winning design was the Stadelhofen Railway Station (Zurich,
1983)
• As he gained commissions, he opened a second office (Paris) in 1989,
and then a third (Valencia) in 1991
• The Milwaukee Art Museum expansion became his first major project
built in the United States in 2001
• Calatrava earned Time Magazine’s “Best of 2001” award and the
International Illumination Design Award of Merit for his work on the MAM
expansion
• He is currently working on three major projects in the United States, as
well as many commissions overseas
The Quadracci Pavilion
Design Concept
• The City of Milwaukee was looking for a “strong architectural statement
in an exciting yet functional building” that would “set an architectural
standard for the next millennium”
• Architect Santiago Calatrava’s response was to design a “glowing
‘lantern’ on the downtown lakefront, radiating light in all directions”
• The design features a large pavilion containing a glass-enclosed
reception hall with a transparent, boat-like prow facing the lake, as well as
a huge, operable wing-like Brise-Soleil sunscreen
Building Layout
Building Layout
Building Layout
Building Layout
Building Layout
Main Level Floor Plan
Structural Features: Finite Element Model
• The complexity of the Quadracci Pavilion required that the mat
foundation slab, pavilion, A-frames, ring beams, and Burke Brise-Soleil be
designed through a detailed finite element model analysis
Structural Features: Building Section
• A quick study of a partial building section reveals the clever arrangement
of pinned concrete arch elements which transfers structural loads to the
foundation wall and center beam
Structural Features: Pavilion
• The mildly-reinforced concrete pavilion supports the back stay beam and
east pier of the pedestrian bridge, as well as the A-frames and building
spine that in turn support the moveable Burke Brise-Soleil
Structural Features: Pavilion
• The cable-stayed bridge pylon and the Quadracci Pavilion’s building
spine are aligned on the same axis and are inclined 48.36 degrees toward
the Pavilion
Structural Features: Burke Brise-Soleil
• The signature element of the Calatrava addition is composed of two
large operable wings, each made up of 36 interconnected fins, spanning
almost 220 feet
Structural Features: Burke Brise-Soleil
• 11 pairs of actuators operate simultaneously to open or close the wings
in unison by turning two rotating spines up to 90 degrees
Structural Features: Pedestrian Bridge
• A cable-stayed pedestrian
bridge featuring a steeply-raked
pylon and ‘boomerang’
abutment spans 230 feet
across a major thoroughfare,
connecting Milwaukee’s
downtown with the waterfront
• The 192-foot-long pylon
supports the 10 major spans of
the bridge through 9 locked-coil
cables and 18 back stay cables
Structural Features: Multiframe 2D® Analysis
• To study the cross-section of the MAM expansion more closely, a
simplified finite element model was constructed using Multiframe 2D;
arches and non-uniform elements were approximated by multiple straight
segments
Structural Features: Multiframe 2D® Analysis
• In addition to the self-weight of the members, dead and live loads on the
roof and floors were approximated by uniform distributed loads; member
sizes were then optimized using the finite element analysis software
Structural Features: Multiframe 2D® Analysis
• Member reactions indicate that the majority of building loads are
transferred through the C1 element to its double-pinned connection with
the center foundation beam
Structural Features: Multiframe 2D® Analysis
• In the simplified model, significant shearing forces are experienced by
the C1 element between the gallery columns and foundation arches, while
loads remain mostly axial through other elements
Structural Features: Multiframe 2D® Analysis
• As might be expected, the largest moments are obtained within the C1
elements in the simplified model; in the actual design, moments are
minimized through the use of arches, and tension forces are controlled
where necessary by post-tensioned steel reinforcement
Structural Features: Multiframe 2D® Analysis
• Through the reduction of internal moments, deflections of the structural
elements are also minimized
Summary
• The recently-completed Quadracci Pavilion, an expansion of the
Milwaukee Art Museum, has achieved praise both as an architectural icon
and a structural marvel
• Floor plans, elevations, and isometric drawings of the pavilion and
attached galleries were provided for reference
• Simplified diagrams explaining the load transfer through a typical gallery
section were discussed; the building was shown to have achieved an
elegant design solution in its balancing of structural forces
• Results from a two-dimensional computer-based structural analysis of
the building’s cross-section were presented for comparison
• Calatrava’s vision of “a glowing ‘lantern’ on the downtown lakefront,
radiating light in all directions” has been fulfilled with a magnificent
structural expression of concrete, steel, and glass

You might also like